Duchess Kate repeated a Jenny Packham gown for the Place2Be reception

The Duchess Of Cambridge Hosts Gala Dinner For The 25th Anniversary Of Place2Be

Last night, the Duchess of Cambridge hosted her first-ever solo reception at Buckingham Palace. I’m pretty sure she’s hosted stuff at BP before, but it’s never been a reception with the palace photographer and stuff. This reception was for the 25th anniversary of Place2Be, one of the Kate’s longest-standing patronages. Kate even made a speech.

As for fashion, she repeated a Jenny Packham gown which I had no memory of – she wore this for the first time in Mumbai, in 2016, during the Cambridges’ Indian tour. Kate had the Packham customized/bespoke with a matching shawl, and she did not wear the shawl last night. She paired the Packham gown with Jimmy Choo silver-sparkle heels and Erdem crystal earrings (thanks to WhatKateWore for these IDs). Honestly, go back and look how she styled it (with the shawl) in India: it’s a much better look there. Without the shawl, this looks like a gown I’m pretty sure a FLOTUS wore to one of her husband’s inaugurations. It’s extremely safe, which isn’t a bad thing, but still… a snooze. Props to her for doing so many repeats though, I guess. Maybe she blew through this month’s dress budget on the Irish struggle-tour.

As for the speech, here’s an excerpt of the written speech where Kate talks about her kids, plus Kensington Palace’s video.

The Duchess Of Cambridge Hosts Gala Dinner For The 25th Anniversary Of Place2Be

The Duchess Of Cambridge Hosts Gala Dinner For The 25th Anniversary Of Place2Be

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

118 Responses to “Duchess Kate repeated a Jenny Packham gown for the Place2Be reception”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Erinn says:

    I kind of like this gown. It’s kind of over the top, but I guess it suits the whole royal kind of vibe. Mostly, I just really like that shade of blue – it looks good on her. Honestly, I think all 4 (W,K,M,H) look really good in blue shades. I think it would have looked nicer with her hair partially or fully pulled back, though.

  2. Scal says:

    Hilary Clinton 1993 inaugural realness 🙄

    Good color and head styling but the rest is soo dated.

  3. bonobochick says:

    The kids’ faces…

    • Maria says:

      Lmao, compare their faces with the faces of the kids at the Robert Clack Upper School with Meghan.

      • Snazzy says:

        That’s what I thought too!! I’ll bet the kids were all thinking “Why can’t Meghan come?” lolol.

      • Ali says:

        Yikes.

        Those poor children probably thought they would be meeting the other duchess.

      • Mac says:

        Being at your own school and being at Buckingham Palace aren’t the same thing. I think they all look nervous.

      • Maria says:

        It’s not like when she visits the schools they’re that much more elated.

    • Gingerbee says:

      Yup Bonobochick. I noticed the children’s Expression were very subdue.

    • TeamAwesome says:

      If my mom knew I was headed to the palace she would put a new spin on putting the fear of God in me re: behavior. That might explain some of it. Also, kids that age aren’t easy to impress, regardless.

    • Lauren II says:

      Hilarious…her own kids have the same expression. Frumpy boredom

    • Lauren II says:

      Hilarious…her own kids have the same expression. Cold, frumpy boringness.

  4. L84Tea says:

    The color of the dress is pretty, but Kate bores me to tears.

  5. Wifaaa says:

    That’s beautiful with the shawl.

    At my daughter’s school lately, there’s been a definite focus lately on emotional and mental health and well-being, along with staff specifically there for that purpose, and I fully support it. That kind of thing didn’t happen in the 80s and 90s, and I hope more focus like this happens as the years go on.

  6. Becks1 says:

    It did look better in Mumbai – maybe the hair being pulled up with the earrings helped to modernize it? But here it looks like she raided Camilla’s closet. Or Hillary Clinton’s like @Scal said above. It looks very dated – and before people come at me with “that’s whats in style!” No, its not. “Dated” is never in style. Vintage, throwback, trend repeats, etc – those things are different from “dated.” This is dated.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      Cathy does not look “fresh”.

      IMHO, the only person who can re-wear her clothes and look “fresh” is Anne because she has such a complete vintage wardrobe from 50+ years of buying that she can just pull the truly vintage pieces that are currently re-trending.

    • Erinn says:

      I agree re: dated vs throwback. It looks kind of like the prom gowns that some of the girls I graduated with wore in ’08.

      She really needs to add some much more clean cut, classic pieces to her wardrobe. Repeats are great and all, but when they are too specific of a style/trend it really shows how disjointed it looks as a repeat. That’s something that I do really admire with Meghan’s choices even if I don’t LOVE all of them. She has a lot of things that can be mixed and redone in a fresh way that makes it feel special.

      • Becks1 says:

        Yes! at the start of her marriage, Kate should have invested in a few high quality, classic evening/cocktail gowns, that she could have reworn throughout the years, adding different jewelry, shoes, clutches etc to change up the look. I’m not saying she should never buy a new gown, obviously, but some of her re-wears just don’t work because that gown wasn’t that amazing to begin with. She invests a lot of money in her coatdresses, she should make the same investment in quality evening/cocktail gowns and separates for daytime (I said that about her Ireland tour – when she relies so heavily on dresses, and not skirts/trousers/blouses/sweaters, its harder to mix things up down the line.)

        (I know she buys nice designer dresses, so I don’t mean quality in that way.)

      • Erinn says:

        YES. And really – even with dresses, if they’re classic enough you can accessorize them super differently, like you said. Heck, she added a shawl to this one in India, and it looked a lot nicer, I think. Or even if she had made a couple of the custom dresses as skirts and tops that LOOK like a cohesive dress but were able to be used as separates as well – that could have worked in her favor too.

  7. Elle says:

    this just screams “mother of the bride”

    • ShazBot says:

      YES! That’s the first thing I thought when I saw it. Her hair/make-up looks great, but the dress just screams Mother of the Bride.

    • Amy Too says:

      I’m very confused at the dress code. The kids are in polo shirts. The other women look more casual, too, like conservative cocktail party, but there’s a guy in a tux, and then Kate is wearing a full on sparkly evening gown.

  8. Lucy2 says:

    I like the gown, but it is sort of mother of the bride —ish. But the color is pretty.

  9. Vava says:

    I like the dress without the shawl, and the color is good on her. Hair and makeup are good, too. She’ll get a permanent hunchback if she doesn’t work on her posture.

    • Vava says:

      editing to add: Kate is not pretty, her inner mean-girl showed yesterday and every time I see her face from now on, I intend to remember that.

      • Olenna says:

        I feel the same way, Vava. All I see is a mean, petty woman lacking in grace and good manners.

  10. Crowned Huntress says:

    How is it that its taken her NINE years to host her first solo engagement?
    Pretty color dress, it feels very prom/dance performance like.
    The BRF screwed the pooch when they pushed H&M out. Everyone else doesn’t have to the range.

    • Oh and look —- Kate is capable of being polite and smiling at a public function. It’s only with certain family that we get the frozen bitch face and blanking behavior.

  11. Qzie says:

    Her coldness to Meghan and Harry? She’s cancelled.

    Yes, yes, I know she is following the rules of the firm, but didn’t she and Harry at one time it appeared have a true friendship? She knew what Meghan is up against and participated (we don’t know how much–but her passivity in the face of blatant racism is participation) against the smears against her.

    Her jealously (the shabby turquoise outfit which I didn’t want to think was about Meghan, but it just had to be, omg) about being upstaged is so real and so palpable, although I’m sure Meghan’s intelligence and beauty are enough to make anyone feel upstaged. But FFS, why not have the maturity to embrace what you have (beautiful children and a horrid husband who has power and money and, remember, you wanted him!) and try to be a leader of what love and humanity looks like in this family of vipers. I used to feel sorry for her at times, but now? Not. She’s clearly withering away, she’s beyond thin.

    • Vava says:

      Totally agree. Kate is CANCELLED once and for all. She showed us who she is and now we must believe her.

      • Gingerbee says:

        Very much so. I was giving her the benefit of the doubt, because she has to deal with Willileaks, but not anymore. She showed her true colors yesterday, and it is not lost on the Commonwealth.

    • Fleur says:

      I haven’t looked at her quite the same since she shared that smirk with Camilla toward the African American Reverend during Meghan and Harry’s wedding.

  12. Digital Unicorn says:

    2 events in one day – poor sausage must need a month long vacation to recover.

    The difference in how the children reacted to her v’s Meghan is very telling – she’s not comfortable and neither are they. Partly due to the location and that she’s all formally dressed up.

  13. Toniko says:

    The Dynasty Linda Evans realness. Poor thing, she will never look stylish no matter what she wears, she just doesn’t have IT.

  14. Hirut says:

    I am not body shaming her at all, I would just like to know how someone still young and so thin has rounded shoulders. No one who even exercises even lightly or just stretches has rounded shoulders which is a sign of bad posture with weak muscles.

    • Rachel says:

      Muscles need adequate fuel to grow & strengthen – it’s not just a matter of doing the right exercises. Osteoporosis may be in her future.

  15. Oatmeal says:

    The gown is lovely and formal

    My issue is, how is Meghan older than Kate but Kate looks 10 years older and slightly haggard to boot?

    I realize she in her mid thirties now without the benefit of melanin but she still should not look a rough 45.

    But I like this look of hers better han anything she wore in Ireland, that’s for sure. I like the hair too.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      A sweat suit from Target would look better than anything she wore on the Shamrock Tour!

      • L84Tea says:

        That Ireland tour was hands down her worst set of clothes EVER. And I didn’t think anything could top the India tour a few years ago. But those green getups were sooooo bad.

    • Belli says:

      Tanning and smoking. I don’t know whether she and William still smoke, but they definitely used to.

    • Tangie says:

      You already answered your own question. Melanin. It is the fountain of youth!

    • Olenna says:

      Meghan is only about 6 months older and, as others have said, the other duchess is now wearing the face (and pretty soon, the neck) she deserves.

  16. Ali says:

    You can really see she doesn’t connect with older kids.

    Perhaps she will get better once her kids grow up.

    Hence why her focus is on early years.

  17. Originaltessa says:

    I don’t like this dress at all. Her hair is pretty, but her hair never matches her clothing, and that bothers me about her. The dress looks like an off the rack mother of the bride dress.

  18. AnnaKist says:

    With all the repeats (a good thing!), she’ll be making a name for herself as The Frugal Duchess. The colour really suits her.

    • bonobochick says:

      Two repeats after blowing £25,000 on a 3 day struggle tour isn’t exactly frugal.

      • Belli says:

        And the £26,000 doesn’t include the pink vintage Oscar de la Renta, which will be another few thousand.

      • Becks1 says:

        Or the McQueen green coat, that she first wore in January, so basically new.

    • Dee says:

      The so-called “Frugal Duchess” usually buys herself expensive jewelry and accessories when she repeats a gown. Hardly frugal.

  19. Awkward symphony says:

    Omg I agree🤭the kids didnt seem excited to be there! I felt the dress was too extravagant for this. I mean look at the other ladies wearing casual dresses. I’ll commend her for hosting the charity after failing her other patronages I hope they’ll make more effort to avoid the closure of another one

    • Lady D says:

      Not that I enjoy anything about helping out Kate, but the last few times she’s been with children, most of the comments stated that she should have dressed like a princess for them, which I agreed with. I thought she was finally listening?

      • MsIam says:

        I haven’t seen any comments like that. Kate seems to get the most compliments when she is dressed down and interacting with kids. Like someone else down below said, here Kate looks like she’s dressed to go somewhere else afterwards. It’s ridiculously over the top for the occasion.

  20. Seraphina says:

    She looks like she should be wearing a sports outfit and be on the field. No glamour to what could be a beautiful look with a decent jazzed dress.

  21. Belli says:

    I can’t believe she’s 9 years in and only now hosting her first solo engagement.

    I mean, I can because of her track record, but it’s ridiculous.

    I love the colour of her gown, but the style is dated on her. It also seems a bit too formal for the event, but that could just be the photos I’ve seen. Maybe other people were dressed just as formally.

    Petty yikes moment, I’m not sure the slow motion smile KP have used to start their video has quite the effect they were going for… 😬

    • Becks1 says:

      I think she hosted an event at Clarence House shortly after she was married (where we could see the wiglet?) and I think that was by herself, but yeah….if she has hosted any other solo events I cant think of them. And all her BP events have involved someone else – Sophie, etc.

  22. penguin says:

    Dress was styled much better in India. I think it worked nicely with the shawl. Its nice for the kids that she dressed up for them

    The problem here is the hair, which ages her 10 years. When you compare the updo from earlier in the day this blow out is very matronly.

    • Amy Too says:

      Why is it nice for the kids that she dressed up for them? I don’t get that comment. They still don’t look excited to see her. And they’re all in polo shirts and stuff which would make me feel very underdressed if I was meeting someone who was wearing a formal gown. She looks like she’s stopping by the nursery to say goodbye to her kids and their gaggle of governesses before she heads out to some grand opening gala for the opera. She doesn’t look like she’s there to stay and interact with them. She looks like she’s passing through.

  23. James says:

    She looks gorgeous

  24. Beth says:

    I don’t like the dress or her hair here but I think some of the comments towards her to be overly harsh. We can speculate but don’t know what’s gone on. I felt desperately sad for all of them yesterday no one looked happy and it must be crushing to know it will be played out on a world stage. Meghan was trying admirably hard to try and pretend everything was alright and props to her for doing that but it was clear it isn’t. I thought she looked beautiful though.

  25. Blue says:

    The kids look cowed. Her dress has an inaugural vibe a la Hilary Clinton. She couldn’t wear a simple day dress and omg look at her holding on to her clutch for dear life. I hope BP offered some decent appetizers.

  26. bonobochick says:

    Kate’s gown is a beautiful color but it does come off as incredibly matronly.

    I need to see more pics of the event but it also seems like the gown is… excessive. Like, folks seem not quite as dressed up for this event as Kate is.

  27. Dee says:

    That’s a Nancy Reagan gown if I ever saw one.

  28. lizzieb says:

    Yikes. Dress is too formal. Kate likes to look like a Disney princess. It falls flat with older kids who aren’t impressed with Cinderella cosplay. Same with the over eager grin. Does she only have two expressions? Earlier in the day she was wearing a face like thunder and now we have the fake looking so happy to be here look.

  29. NYCGirl says:

    The dress doesn’t fit the occasion. Kate look like a 50 year old woman going to the Mountbatten Festival (Meghan’s red dress event) vs hosting children dressed in school uniforms at KP. I’m not sure who is advising Kate but it’s obvious she is grasping for attention…it’s starting to look very desperate and sad. She should stop trying to copy/compete with Meghan…they’re not in the same league. She should stick to her Turnip Toff looks

    • lizzieb says:

      Hey easy on the age thing lol. Many over 50 have great style. Not me, but then again I never did.

    • windyriver says:

      Yes, that’s my take too – this dress is to compete with Meghan’s red dress from the Mountbatten event. It’s completely inappropriate here with children dressed in polo shirts but she wants us to see how good she looks in similar jewel tones and long dresses. She must not be able to help herself from being competitive even if she’s going about it completely the wrong way. Meghan makes an impact with what she wears not just because of how she looks, but because of the depth of character that shows in the things she does.

      These people and their advisors (mama Carole?) are beyond stupid.

  30. Flying fish says:

    I was never a fan or impressed by Kate but based on her conduct yesterday, she disgust me. Harry always seemed rather attentive and caring towards her and this is how she repays him.
    No amount of gowns or tiaras is going to get rid of Kate’s mean girl ugliness.

  31. MellyMel says:

    She really is in the wrong decade. Girl would have THRIVED in the 80s and early 90s!

  32. Flying fish says:

    Why is it that whenever she gives a speech she is always aided by subtitles!

    • RoyalBlue says:

      So the hearing impaired can understand.

      • Amy Too says:

        Seriously? They don’t do it for anyone else or for the reporters or the rest of the television program that features a Kate speech, they just subtitle Kate.

      • Flying fish says:

        No, shit Sherlock, the individual who introduced Kate wasn’t subtitled.

  33. Watson says:

    She looks nice but she isn’t interesting. I miss Megs!!!

  34. heygingersnaps says:

    The children’s faces! Children cannot lie.
    Also, what a shame that her other patronage The Art Room had to close due to a lack of funds.
    I think after years and years of no to poor result, one can say she doesn’t really care about her patronages, they are only there for them to give her good PR.
    No wonder that charity (whose name escapes me) preferred Ed Sheeran to her.

  35. Mich says:

    What a weird thing to wear to a reception for children who are all dressed casually. Was that the only thing in her closet that matched the kid’s purple shirts?

  36. Jen says:

    I like the dress. It’s a little aging, but so are most of her looks and this is better than most. I would have liked it better with her hair pulled back like the first time she wore it.

  37. Valiantly Varnished says:

    I fell asleep looking at these photos.

  38. aquarius64 says:

    Camilla called; she wants her gown back. And Camilla wore it better.

  39. Leftie says:

    Terrible dress on Kate. Old fashioned, a real old lady dress. I notice Kate always seems to cover her arms. I wonder why? Clearly she does lots of sports, her arms must look pretty good. She looks tired as well. It must have been a hard day for her no matter what motives are ascribed to her. And she’s got three young children , whom she does look after. But she looks pooped.

  40. Guest with Cat says:

    I think the dress is absolutely stunning, but apparently by the comments here, that may be due to my age and the fact I have no taste. I just know I like blue and I like shiney things. My great niece loves Elsa from “Frozen” so I know she’s going to go nuts for this dress if she sees it, because it looks a little like something Elsa wears in Frozen 2.

    So anyway, I love the dress. If I were suddenly to find myself switched Freaky Friday style with Kate, after everyone leaves, I’d spin around the palace singing songs from Frozen and fling ice cubes at William (if he’s even around) and any courtiers I come across. If I were Kate for the day, I’d be such a handful. I’d call a press conference and let loose on Piers Morgan for starters. Lol.

    • LindaS says:

      I agree. I love the dress and Kate looks good but probably because I am older and have no taste. I don’t think you have to be in up to the minute styles to look great. Just wear what fits you properly and what you like. The royal family is not a fashion show.

    • Nic919 says:

      I don’t mind the dress but it seems too formal for the occasion.

  41. bitchy architect says:

    was this photo taken in 1982?

  42. Kates manic grin is scaring the kids.

  43. RoyalBlue says:

    The look on those kids faces shows no enthusiasm. Clearly disappointed the wrong duchess came.

  44. Cosmo says:

    Those kids look like they would be happier to see the other duchess. Too bad Kate is not a nice person. Her and Meghan could have done so much for kids if they worked together. Jealousy is a horrible thing.

  45. anon says:

    I have to say it:

    The Duchess of Cambridge needs to eat a GD sandwich. That girl is waaaay too thin.

    • HK9 says:

      Kathy Keen is busy mean girling her inlaws, and feigning concern for the commonwealth….she doesn’t have time to eat.

  46. KBeth says:

    The dress is fine, just rather matronly. She is so bland.

  47. Amelie says:

    I really loved this the first time she wore it but the shawl really did make a difference and her hair was up and she was wearing great earrings. The effect is muted with her hair down. I really think she pulled this out at the last minute when she saw all the great outfits Meghan put together for her farewell tour. She also looks way fancier than the other guests so it’s kind of a weird choice for her to wear it.

  48. yinyang says:

    THis looks like a prom dress with sleeves, kind of blah, but things usually do the second time you wear them. Her hair and her make up is getting better, I noticed her eyeliner used to be done very heavyhanded, her eyes are naturally very dark and slightly close together so the eye liner all around made them look more so, now her eye makeup is more towards the outer eye, it’s getting better she must be paying attention to the experts that work for her.

  49. Florence says:

    Oh I like the dress, mostly because of the colour.

    Shame about the woman inside it.

  50. Boo says:

    That speech is just so anodyne- buzz word after buzz word so that it becomes meaningless. I quite like Kate but she’s the epitome of bland (and that’s why she’s a ‘successful’ royal wife I guess)

  51. Feebee says:

    Unfortunately she has to play it safe but at the same time I think that’s her personality too.

  52. Liz version 700 says:

    Hummmmm another blue dress. Just missing the raindrops… I wonder if she is still trolling Meghan? If so it isn’t working.

  53. Jessica says:

    she has an amazing head of hair. Unfortunately, the style reminds me of that “Like you just stepped out of a salon!” ad from the 90s.

    https://youtu.be/C-VZ2fBzGnk

  54. Nikki* says:

    She looks quite lovely here.