Prince Harry issued a statement about the withdrawal from Afghanistan yesterday. He issued it jointly with the CEO of the Invictus Games, and it was through the Invictus platform. The statement focused on veteran supporting veterans at this time, because many veterans in the Invictus community served in Afghanistan. Well, it seems like Harry had more to say, and Meghan wanted to join him in making a joint statement. They just posted this on Archewell this morning:
“The world is exceptionally fragile right now.
As we all feel the many layers of pain due to the situation in Afghanistan, we are left speechless.
As we all watch the growing humanitarian disaster in Haiti, and the threat of it worsening after last weekend’s earthquake, we are left heartbroken.
And as we all witness the continuing global health crisis, exacerbated by new variants and constant misinformation, we are left scared.
When any person or community suffers, a piece of each of us does so with them, whether we realize it or not. And though we are not meant to live in a state of suffering, we, as a people, are being conditioned to accept it. It’s easy to find ourselves feeling powerless, but we can put our values into action — together.
To start, we encourage you to join us in supporting a number of organizations doing critical work. We also urge those in positions of global influence to rapidly advance the humanitarian dialogues that are expected to take place this fall at multilateral gatherings such as the U.N. General Assembly and the G20 Leaders’ Summit.
As an international community, it is the decisions we make now — to alleviate suffering among those we know and those we may never meet — that will prove our humanity.”
– The Duke and Duchess of Sussex
If you visit the Archewell site, you’ll see that they provided links to several charities and organizations to help with the multiple unfolding crises in Afghanistan, Haiti and with the global pandemic. They also provided links to mental health resources too. Combined with Harry’s statement yesterday with Invictus, I am really wondering if he’s experiencing some PTSD at the images coming out of Afghanistan, or if Harry has been on the phone with his veteran friends who are really struggling right now.
While I know Harry and Meghan are not doing this on purpose, their statement does draw attention to the fact that Buckingham Palace, Clarence House and Kensington Palace have not issued many statements on the three crises. BP did issue one message of condolence from the Queen to the president of Haiti. That’s it. The “future kings” haven’t bothered to say anything.
A message of condolence from Her Majesty The Queen to the Prime Minister of Haiti.https://t.co/F75vpyLElC
— The Royal Family (@RoyalFamily) August 16, 2021
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.
I love that they issued a statement and said, here is how you can help, listing resources and charities that people can either donate to or get involved with.
Yes listing those charities on their website was excellent.
Not to minimise Meg and Harry in any way, but this is the kind of thing that *should* be coming from either Charles or William. The crisis in Afghanistan is a massive event of global importance (incl. and especially for British forces who have fought and lost lives there) and they are the next kings of the UK. Like, this shouldn’t have to come from Archewell, it should be a top priority for the entire Royal family. But, very thankfully, H&M are there to step in for their completely useless relatives who are mute on these types of issues.
Unless of course it involves racism in soccer. Then big willy will definitely write a tweet.
@Beenie: I don’t think you are belittling Harry and Meghan. The Royal Family has the scope to be more involved in world events. The Queen is the Commander of the British Armed Forces. But I think they are unwilling to do more for fear of the media and accusations of being political and because they don’t care about anything or anybody except maintaining their power.
This is the kind of thing that should be coming from serious philanthropists, what the Sussexes are, and what the RF claim to be. It just makes the royals look like a bunch of lightweights playing at charity work, while H&M get down and dirty.
It absolutely should be coming from the queen, charles etc. People look to their leaders in time of crises. It says a lot that they are silent on so many of these events.
(It can also come from Harry and Meghan as well, but I’m surprised that neither Charles nor William has said anything.)
William saying nothing is par for the course but I am really surprised that Charles has not made any type of statement.
Heir Force 1 & 2 and Queen cannot be bothered while they are on break in scotland and they have more important things to think about .They are strategizing on Andrew’s case because monarchy is in danger.
The BRF and in particular Charles and William are saving their energy for issuing a statement denying Andrew’s guilt and vehemently proclaiming Andrew’s innocence. That’s all they care about because it affects the monarchy and blah blah blah.🙄🙄🙄
Was it Billy No Mates and/or UpChuck who previously put out statements while Harry, their flesh and blood was in Afghanistan and they did everything they could to let the Taliban know where he was. Who cares about anybody else in their minds while Harry sits there rent free. Remember, these two idiots respect power and control no matter how it looks to them. Idiots. They probably also respect the Taliban position on women. Birds of a feather as they say …
I hope Canada is next to go on the list of countries leaving Commonwealth. I can’t stand seeing these idiots on our currency.
It’s political that’s why they can’t get involved on this level
JT – ITA x a gazillion. If we continue to think of H & M as members of the RF (which honestly I do not), then yes it seems absurd for non working “minor” royals to be the one issuing the statements that should come from BP. But I consider H & M to be bonafide philanthropists akin to their neighbor Oprah, e.g. not born to be benevolent but wealthy through hard work and committed to global causes.
Many world “leaders” have said far less than H&M managed in their statement. What they said was relatable and calming. It was heartfelt and what I needed to hear. I know their links are safe and reliable. Right now, much of the focus on the news stations I’ve watched (CBC, CNN–not much time as it’s mid-summer harvest) is concern for former service men and women who may be triggered by the Taliban’s takeover and images capturing that. Women and girls living in that country are in very real danger–it’s difficult to know how to help in a tangible way but tuning out isn’t an option for me. Right now, B.C. is burning. There’s ash falling hundreds of kms from the wild fires in OK Valley. It hasn’t rained properly for months. Every day reveals more horrors from former residential schools that stripped aboriginal children of their culture and tore their souls, but you know, “it was all done in the name their god” and no, the churches involved aren’t truly cooperating and their very lacking apologies only make them feel better. So much is happening, I feel out of breath most days and it’s not from the heavy smoke hanging everywhere.
To be fair, the Queen would only ever comment on Commonwealth countries, isn’t that right?
@Aphra: No she has sent out statements to non-commonwealth countries before. She’s the Head of State of the UK, she just doesn’t have political power like other Heads of State.
@Amy she’s the Head of State for 16 countries in the Commonwealth.
@Mika: I know that. Soon to be 15 when Barbados gets rid of the Queen. My point was she is a Head State in the same vein as the US President except she has no political power and she’s unelected. She’s a ceremonial figurehead.
She sent out a comment about the recent Haitian earthquake. They try so hard to APPEAR apolitical…
If @Celebitchy team doesn’t mind I’d like to add this organization sent to me via friend who has worked in Haiti and has a lot of contacts there. It’s a credible organization. Might be of use to anyone who wants to help. Having been through this kind of experience I know how much help is needed and how long the recovery from this takes. Not to mention the PTSD afterwards. People still shake 8 months after and can be scared of the slightest shakes like car passing by or just some unexpected sound. https://www.haitianhealthfoundation.org/?fbclid=IwAR1vOTHjVJIlUBI0zMGHYD0K4pjcLWSPh89Vk5suPFlr9b9h5ZOUmgD14ccđ
Me too, just donated to Women for Afghan Women.
The BR establishment WILL NEVER be able to meet the bar set by the Duke and Duchess Sussex. And that my friends scares the living daylights out them.
I would love to know who helps to write their statements (and maybe they do not have assistance) – because the statements are eloquent and powerful. Their statement also touch upon all the horrors we are seeing and yes, it is a scary time globally. And this has mass impact on mental wellness.
My sincere kudos to the Sussexes. A job more than well done.
Agreed. But I don’t think the RF could do this even if they wanted to. People would be asking why don’t you support organizations in the UK, blah, blah, blah. All they can do is send out pallid condolences. As it turns out, Harry and Meghan can be of more service by leaving the RF than by staying in it.
YES! Ironic that they had to leave what they thought was a platform for a global voice and a catalyst for change (The BRF) and they actually can do more being on their own.
Agreed. Harry and Meghan have set the bar high in everything they do with a fraction of the resources the Keens have. The rest of the royals have a ridiculous amount of man power behind them and yet they wouldn’t even be able to organise a p*ss up in a brewery. Harry and Meghan always get it just right, they are able to modernise without cheapening themselves, as well as showing sincerity without being political.
^^ @Seraphina, I think the Sussexes write their own statements. Meghan is a good writer, despite some critics claiming she’s too wordy. Possibly, they have some editing help, but the thoughts, construction, and genuine expressions of concern are their own.
It has been quite wonderful to see Harry blossom into a better speaker, not to mention coming into his own as a leader and a stand-up man, with a bada$$, strong, beautiful woman by his side. Meghan is the wind beneath Harry’s wings. In turn, he gently treats her with care and respect, like the rare treasure that she is.
They are in such sync with their ideas and their caring hearts. It’s very inspiring and uplifting to witness their outstanding leadership, driven by true compassion, backed up by action.
I think that is notable that they released a page with this statement called the Archewell Commitment mentioning they are working with World Central Kitchen in Haiti and supporting the military community and vulnerable Afghanis on the ground. The initial statement is good but i appreciate that there seems to be actual work being done here and the links to mental health services is a great touch as well.
I saw some of Harry’s army friends tweeting about Afghanistan so I’m sure you’re right that he is having those conversations and that he or some of his friends might be struggling.
To quote James Brown, “Get on up, get into it, get involved!”
I think what they’ve said is great.
I do like that they’ve given links to places to help/donate. It shows they can “walk the walk” instead of just talk. I said this in the other post but I do think it’s a good idea that they stick to the focusing on the charity/mental health aspect instead of getting into the politics (especially with Afghanistan) of it.
I often think that’s the best way for high profile people to help – draw attention to established, functioning organizations that are doing the actual work, and say here are resources for you to help or get help.
As I said on the earlier post I have no doubts that Harry has been affected by the events in Afghanistan. And he has most likely spoken to his military friends about it. It should be noted that more than half of the executive team of the Invictus Foundation are veterans and some have served in Afghanistan. That Harry and Meghan has put out this statement is not a huge surprise but it’s an indication of the work they wanted to do as royals and were prevented from doing. Leaving was really the best decision they made as they have a voice and can be proactive and productive on their own.
There was a British soldier on the radio news this afternoon talking about how he feels about Afghanistan and he was eloquent while also sounding like he was struggling to process exactly what is happening and what all their efforts were for.
Powerful statement. I feel for the people in Afghanistan, Haiti and COVID sufferers. I will be donating to there linked charities.
While I appreciate what they’re doing here, it’s not lost on me that they begin a multi-paragraph statement with “…we are left speechless.”
Before anyone comes at me, please know that I’m not being snarky. I love what these two are doing, particularly the emphasis they put on “using your voice.” These are two people who were expected to sit by quietly as William grew more into his role, yet they have carved out a meaningful new role for themselves while reminding others that they can do the same.
So the words here have meaning. They are not “speechless.” They have something to say and they’re doing it. Good for them for doing it, and good for them for setting the example for others to do it. But the word implies powerlessness in a way that is contrary to the otherwise high standard they’ve shown in their communications.
My initial reaction was speechlessness, too. After that, I had plenty to say.
Not now Emily. Is this Emily Andrews btw?
Maybe its Emily Giffen, lol. She would probably have a similar take especially if it involved Meghan.
Maybe they were, though. Maybe, since Harry actually served in Afghanistan, he was watching this unfold and it affected him. Also, words and language aren’t static. A word can have an original meaning and have a common usage not as literal. It happens constantly. Perhaps it would be better to focus on the meat of the statement rather than find one line to complain about.
I think they are summing what is leaving them speechless. Everything, in total, that we are seeing unraveling and growing chaotically is pretty hard to digest.
I think it’s possible to be both. That when they i initially heard and saw the images they were rendered speechless and breathless. The words come in torrents. Between moments of shocked silence. That’s how it is with trauma. That’s how it is with tragedy.
That is a saying many use when emotions and or grief run so deep that talking about it steals not only your breath but your words.. at least that is how I have used it and that definition of the phrase fits how many feel.
*Not a judgement or criticism just a different take on a commonly used phrase
Yeah, this is what I took it to mean. And honestly, looking at the videos and photos of everything that’s happening in Afghanistan and Haiti, I can definitely say I was speechless.
@Simone: Speechless can be used as synonym for shocked. I didn’t think showing compassion for others meant that we had to go through an English lesson. It’s a figure of speech.
Do you now know what speechless means as a colloquial term or something….?
Edit.
@Emily No, saying one is ‘speechless’ is a normal reaction that everyone has when they see a terrifying event unfold in front of their eyes. But then you galvanize into action and try to help in any capacity and form which the Sussexes have done and are doing. Because in the end speeches do not matter, Action does!
But, Solid A to Emily for affording the trolls an opportunity to pile on any positive message and action by Harry and Meghan. Seriously, I am tired of all the closeted derangers coming out of the woodwork on positive Sussex reporting platforms like Celebitchy and providing the trolls with a new talking point to disparage and rant against H & M. Just do something positive yourself instead of playing the Devil’s Advocate and belittling these two all the time!
I find, imho, opinion that some of you are tearing apart words used in this most compassionate statement, a lot like trolling.
I personally saw nothing wrong with their use of words. I would also like to say, you all got the gist of the release, so what’s with the pettiness. Like I said, no disrespect, it is my personal opinion.
I can tell you that I was speechless when I saw the images of people falling from the plane in Afghanistan yesterday. You can still process that and speak on it…as they did.
That is exactly what I did as well. My jaw was slack for what felt like endless minutes while I watched CNN footage, and I think that is exactly what Meghan and Harry are describing.
Agree Amy Bee. What an odd thing to pick at. This statement was powerful and I am sure Harry is really going through it right now with everything going on in Afghanistan. An English lesson isn’t really needed right now.
I read it as they’re speechless about Afghanistan, then they’re heartbroken about Haiti and scared about the pandemic. Because that’s quite literally what they said. They said they were speechless about Afghanistan and then they moved on to another two topics. They didnt follow up with a bunch of talk specifically about what’s going on in Afghanistan or what they think should happen there or what they think didn’t happen correctly there. They’re speechless about that. They’re heartbroken about Haiti. They’re scared about covid. There is a lot of suffering right now. They would like to help alleviate some of that suffering around the world.
I agree with @Margaret and most everyone else’s response to this thread. It’s semantics. We are going through an insanely unprecedented time right now. I know I personally am having a lot of trouble finding the words to express the torrential emotions I’m feeling about everything that is happening. This is nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking, and it’s silly and perhaps an effort to control when there really isn’t a lot that is controllable right now.
Emily, I am left speechless by your focusing in on the choice of one word. But now that I no longer feel speechless, let me say that maybe Harry wanted to use the word “speechless” because that was his specific, personal reaction to the images coming in through the media. That being said, I’m off to donate.
Oh for crying out loud. It is a figure of speech. They are describing their initial reactions. They’re not literally speechless than they can’t say anything at all. It’s no different than using the words shocked, dumbfounded, horrified etc etc.
This is just being nitpicky. If you can’t say anything nice don’t bother resorting to criticising figures of speech
One of the dictionary definitions of the word speechless specifically includes the manner in which it was used here.
It was correct to use it the way they did here.
Literally everyone who says they are ‘speechless’ does so while speaking or writing. Hysterical overdramatization, keep us laughing Simone.
It’s only jarring if you are unfamiliar with figures of speech used in North America. Speechless is never literally used as being unable to speak but being unable to fully express emotions on a shocking event. I am pulling this from one of the dictionary definitions for the word speechless so maybe instead of criticizing the use of a word and being entirely wrong, people should take a seat when concern trolling and being absolutely incorrect on the proper use of the word speechless.
I like that the Sussexes can (and do!) do this. I imagine that the official royal offices are worried about overstepping their bounds re politics. So much of the unfolding disasters have so large a political component that BP et al are effectively gagged.
It’s great that M&H are able to help people help out.
Nah, they’ll happily play politics if it benefits their bottom line or allows them to hide their racist hiring practices. They’re not gagged. They’re just too focused on protecting their image now that people are actually talking about Paedo Andrew. Plus, they don’t actually give a shit about how any of these crises are affecting people.
William was just in Scotland meeting with that anti-independence fellow a few months ago, following in the footsteps of the queen who subtly campaigned against an independent Scotland at the last referendum. Charles also stops laws from being implemented that will negatively impact the royals. They are political when it suits them and nobody gives a damn about it. A future head of state expressing sympathy with those who are suffering wouldn’t have been a big deal to the UK press and if William had said something, they would have called him a global statesman.
@Oddsnends: Charles and William talk about the environment all the time. That’s a political issue.
The Sussexes should be the future monarch and queen consort of the UK.
Nah, they’re better off without that nonsense. Abolish the monarchy.
For real. It’s been very clear, to me at least, that a part of the fear of the Sussexes was the fact that they are actually more suited for the top job. Of course Harry was carrying the burden for years as the shadow king so to speak but Meg has what it takes to be a consort as well. I think the longer H&M would have stayed working royals the more the public would have picked up on it. Of course the Sussexes being more popular hurt some egos but I also think it made the Keens fearful of their positions, even though they can’t be removed. The Keens would have been king and queen in name only while H&M would have been the face. Harry already was called the “jewel of the crown” before Meg which the firm was fine with before but there was his partnership with Meg really shook them. Oh well, I’m happy that Harry and Meghan are living on their own terms now.
Elegant and effective statement, just like the Sussex’s. Crickets from the future kings. We all see who got the leadership gene in the Windsor family.
I would expect nothing less from the Sussex’s and Archewell. It was a well written statement with links to resources that people have been asking about when inquiring how to help. I am not a veteran and I am shell-shocked by the events and devastation happening.
+1
With all due respect, it would simply not be possible for the Queen, Prince Charles or the Cambridges to issue a statement like this – it is an overtly political position (for the right reasons, don’t get me wrong) and would the put the unelected head of state at odds with the position of the elected British government, who are currently pulling troops and evacuating citizens from Afghanistan. There have been hints and indiscreet mutterings over the years about the Royal Family’s position on various political issues including Brexit and Scottish independence, but nothing as clear as this statement from the Sussexes. A previous commenter said that this was an indication of the work they wanted to do as royals – this situation actually shows how impossible it was for them to remain within the narrow confines of the politically acceptable charity work the Royal Family can get involved in, and how much more freedom the Sussexes have in their new roles.
So the Queen cannot give some words of encouragement to her troops? She does when they “win” a war and makes statements in commemoration of D day and VE day.
Hadn’t thought about that but the royals are supposedly honorary members of certain branches. You would think they would offer support. I guess, they might if they can wear their unearned uniforms and medals and do it.
Not when the troops are currently being pulled out…
I think Hannah’s point is that the Sussexes are private citizens and don’t have to coordinate with others before making a statement. With the BRF, they have to coordinate with the Prime Minister and the elected government to make sure they are in agreement. Condolences to Haiti are obvious, what to say about Afghanistan is not. As for Covid – they make statements by their actions, getting vaccinated and I wish they’d be better about wearing masks.
For the Afghanistan thing maybe but the Queen issued a letter of sympathy to Haiti. Charles or Will could have followed that up with aid to Haiti. The royals are patrons of many charities, surely one of them is doing something.
Supporting veterans, hurricane survivors, and helping people in the middle of a pandemic are humanitarian issues. How is that political?
The veterans are coming from a campaign that the elected government is choosing to end. The Queen has offered condolences to Haiti, a natural disaster. She quite simply can’t comment on the epic political and humanitarian disaster that is the UK’s involvement in Afghanistan without covertly criticising the current UK government.
Harry’s statement yesterday through Invictus did not criticize the UK government. You can offer support without criticizing.
Bullshit. There is nothing political about an earthquake or a fatal epidemic. Harry’s statement yesterday has shown when you care, there is nothing political about showing concern for human suffering, whether from natural or militant forces. Because there is always a way to care, it’s only greedy, lazy cowards who hide behind the “too political” excuse.
🎯💯% 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Please. When Trump was first elected Charles spoke about dangers of populism and religious persecution which everyone said was in reference to Trump’s Muslim travel ban. Hes also spoken out on climate change in advance of G7 etc meetings & lobbied Trump directly on the issue. William claimed speaking to Chinese officials meant he helped china’s government change its policy on ivory trade. Anne has spoken on issues of Brexit to British farmers & the opportunities for the sector. Andrew did the same as a working royal.
The royals are very political & could easily issue a similar statement. Trust me Charles, William etc will speak out soon & we’ll be briefed that Charles has donated to the Red Cross or some similar org, William is doing calls to returning soldiers thanking them etc
Exactly. The royals are very much political when it suits and then claim to be very much NOT political when it suits them.
Hannah, how is it “political?” “Speechless by the scenes” is political?
I’m very tired of the excuses some people make for the BRF. It is not wrong to voice support to those who are suffering, in the world. They can get involved with praise for themselves, and claim they provide service though their charities, but can’t express compassion formally to those people who are hurting. I think they, the uk, still have troops in Afghanistan. So what can be wrong with a heartfelt few words of compassion.
I am reminded of the words of the sussexes, SERVICE IS UNIVERSAL.
I’m not making excuses for the BRF, but they did make a statement about Haiti (however bland) and the Queen did make a speech about Covid last year (April maybe?), although I wish they would set a better example about wearing masks. So, that leaves Afghanistan, which is an unfolding situation, and it wouldn’t surprise me if there weren’t some coordination going on with the government about what should be said and offered as help. I prefer the Sussex approach, but they have the advantage of being private citizens with a small, nimble and focused organization. The monarchy is the exact opposite of that.
Quite honestly, I fail to see how what they said is so political that it would make it impossible for them to be working royals. (I don’t want them to be working royals, they’re doing much better on their own, but this statement does not preclude them from being royals.)
“As we all feel the many layers of pain due to the situation in Afghanistan, we are left speechless.”
“the many layers of pain….” how is that political? that’s acknowledging that it is a complicated situation, its not black and white, and its not easy to know the right answer. The most political part about it I guess is urging international leaders to consider the humanitarian aspects of these crises during upcoming international gatherings – but if you can’t see “please, leaders, try to help people” without being political…then what the hell is the point of the royal family anyway?
This 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 @becks1 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
The most political part about it I guess is urging international leaders to consider the humanitarian aspects of these crises during upcoming international gatherings – but if you can’t see “please, leaders, try to help people” without being political…then what the hell is the point of the royal family anyway?
It’s truly sad that what is now considered “political”, is simply having basic empathy for your fellow humans.
Precisely, Becks. If the figurehead of the British Commonwealth can’t make a statement in support of the Commonwealth troops and veterans, what is the point of having the figurehead in the first place? They are just highlighting how utterly useless the royal family is, yet again.
I feel like it’s the 80s and 90s again, and people are bleating about Princess Diana for supporting AIDS patients and highlighting anti-landmine charities. The royal family hasn’t gotten better at covering their incompetence in the two decades since her death. I suppose it’s not all that shocking that Harry is again his mother’s son.
I’m not sure how being sad that people are dying in Afghanistan, being sad that people are suffering due to an earthquake, and being sad/scared about a deadly disease spreading is political though? They didn’t give an opinion on anything. Didn’t say that climate change caused the earthquake, didn’t say that troops should have remained in Afghanistan, or said that everyone should be vaccinated and that people who aren’t are killing us all. They expressed sadness and dismay at death and destruction. I don’t get how that’s political in any way. They suggested people support non-political charities to help people who are suffering.
@AmyToo ITA. They, and their supporters, use this as an excuse constantly and it drives me insane.
When Kate didn’t wear black to the BAFTAs that year along with all of the other women, her stans claimed she couldn’t because it was “too political.” So women not wanting to be sexually assaulted or harassed is “political?” Or wanting the person who did sexually assault or harass them to face consequences, political? Give me a break.
I think something similar was said around the time of the Black Lives Matter protests. So, people not wanting to be shot and killed by police officers for absolutely no reason except existing is “political?” It’s such bullsh!t.
They could absolutely say something about being sorry to see so much human suffering. No one expects them to come out with a statement condemning (or praising, for that matter) decisions made by the government for god’s sake. They just don’t care.
I highly doubt that Kate (and possibly William too) even knows there IS anything going on in Afghanistan.
Let’s face it. If any of the non-black members of the RF gave this exact statement. No one would bat and eye. It would be lauded as the next coming the of the great white hopes. Please stop making excuses for them. We all know if you are white then you are right. Period.
It’s amazing how the Windsors can decorate themselves with faux military gear, but remain silent to provide support for the troops they pretend to lead. Was George VI silent about troop support during WWII? I believe the answer is no.
The Queen is busy minding her son.
Yup. You have one leader babysitting the dangerous criminal and the other busy plotting to get rid of the criminal, to cover their own arses. Who’s got the time to care about traumatized military personel or the terrified citizens left behind when their popularity is taking a hit?
Well the US (Biden) has done such a great job. Its time the US realized not everyone is like them or thinks the way they do. Just look at what is happening in the US with the border crisis and now this!!
And they are all on a 2-3 month long vacation, relaxing from the hard work and fulfilled duty, with no free time to send a tweet.
I appreciate them so much, and I used two of the links and donated to Afghanistan and Haiti. Not much, but it did make me feel better to help out even a little. They’re so good at capturing the feeling of the moment and suggesting tangible ways to help other people.
Yesterday was very overwhelming emotionally and their statement encapsulates how so many of us are feeling right now. The helplessness that Haiti can’t catch a break, the frustration with those refusing to mask up and get vaccinated when others have no access to vaccines and Delta spreading, and the horror of watching our chaotic pullout of Afghanistan, even knowing that that war should have ended long ago.
I think it also raises awareness, to an extent — there are a lot of young people (and I know some adults, too, unfortunately) who just don’t follow the news/current events at all, but they *do* follow celebrities and people like the Sussexes, so I’m betting there are a lot of fans who learned about these issues today due to Harry and Meghan.
Thank you for noting he, or any person who survived PTSD may indeed be re-experiencing some PTSD symptoms as images ans news like this are certainly trauma reminders. To anyone experiencing this, you are loved, there is support for you, this is very common, and re-experiencing does NOT mean you are back to square one in your recovery, even though it can feel that way. Please reach out to professionals and trusted loved ones. You are worthy of a safe, unbiased, and helpful space to process your experiences. Here is a US website with different mental health resources. https://www.mentalhealth.gov/get-help/immediate-help
As for Meghan and Harry’s statement, these people are just trying to use what they have to make a positive impact on the world. Sean Smith, author of “Meghan Misunderstood” said something on Twitter about how Meghan was often hated in royal circles because every time she was in a room, she was the most intelligent person in it, which is disgusting. I think the fact she has a degree in International relations puts her in a perfect position to do this kind of work. Man, the BRF really let their Jealousy and ego override a major missed opportunity. And, furthermore, the media needs to stop calling humanitarian issues “political” issues and pretending the BRF not commenting on them is political neutrality and not privileged laziness.
Totally agree!
I love that! She was definitely the smartest in the room with the royals and it’s great that someone said it out loud. Tbh I think she’s smarter than all of them put together.
So glad to see the Sussexes jumping in to assist in any way and providing information so we can help too. Especially with Haiti because it looks like a tropical storm/hurricane is about to hit them too.
Could I possibly love these two anymore than I already do. Harry and Meghan are indeed compassion in action. The keenbridges could really benefit from that 40 by 40 .
I understand people taking issue with being “speechless” at the beginning of what is a “speech” but I find it rather literal and and stretch of “logic.” To me, they are describing their initial reactions and feelings. Those have not paralyzed them, however, and their response is to do whatever they can to alleviate human suffering which is what all three situations have in common. They are not issuing this statement as royals, but on behalf of themselves as humanitarians. It’s clear that Harry and Meghan have a “voice” to help mobilize people to help. Is that not what they both have stated they ever wanted to do, and have proven it by their actions towards all ongoing disasters, crises, and unjust situations?
Being rendered ‘speechless’ is a figurative expression of intense shock and disbelief, it does not mean you can’t speak, it is the same as being dumbfounded. Honestly, this nitpicking of a brilliant statement by The Sussexes, in the big scheme of things is embarassing; Comprehension! Comprehension my dears!
THIS. Especially as it’s a flipping written statement.
WERK. That’s all.
New headline on the Fail:
“Never fear, the Sussexes are here! Harry and Meghan wade into Afghanistan crisis with ‘word salad’ statement saying they’re ‘speechless’ (if only)”
What. The. Actual. Fuck.
OMG I thought you were kidding. If only.
Thought you were joking too…
Wow. I thought you were joking as well. If Kate and Will put a statement out that just says “Thoughts and prayers” they would be praised. The Daily Mail would hail it as the best statement ever. This is so pathetic.
the toxicity is breathtaking.
I’ve filled in the ‘batshit demented and disturbingly possessive statement from Angela Levin’ square on my bingo card.
Although, batshit demented statement from Angela Levin is a tautology, really.
Angela Levin is seriously warped in the head. If you want to read a kind of entertaining piece about Levin-it’s about her writing an actual authorized biography – Max Clifford-unlike her unauthorized book, based on talking to him for 2 seconds, about Harry. It’s an older DM article titled CRAIG BROWN: Clifford the creep and a tricky tango. The last sentence is..
“Unfortunately, she cannot make their shared book disappear. Instead, like a Victorian phantom, it will stick around to haunt her.”
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’ statement is very poignant and on point. If people have a problem with it-that is their own perception & perverse need. They must not make it towards the end where it states..
“To start, we encourage you to join us in supporting a number of organizations doing critical work.”
If anyone should recognize word salad it’s anyone writing for the daily fail.
That is disgusting. Literally criticizing them for wanting people to help and giving them a few resources in case they’re not sure where to start.
Needless to say if the Cambridges had issued the exact same statement, word for word, they’d be falling all over themselves with praise. Bill the statesman, Kate so caring, etc.
Luckily their BS won’t actually have an effect on it — people who like them are still going to donate — but criticizing any sort of help during multiple humanitarian crises is just…I don’t even know. Next-level cruel and ignorant.
VERY statemen like! Bravo to them for speaking on this despite the onslaught of trashy publications coming after them for this. You’d think the head of state or at least one of the keenbridges would release something but nope, I guess they too are on maternity leave!!!
The way the fail is acting you’d think they’re an jelouse ex who’s bitc**g about his hot successful ex partner. & calling it “word salad” as if they have pulitzer prize winner writers in their ranks😂I’m no longer triggered by their nasty articles. It’s so unhinged it’s now like watching a cheap train wreak comedy show🤣
Right! Next thing she’ll do is be amazed at how many likes or comments bots gave/made. Bots are Levin’s besties.
I thought word salad was when a person use a lot of words that at the end means absolutely nothing, like one of Kate’s speeches on early childhood development. The Sussexes are following up their words with action.
There’s no need to criticize everything that they do, it has become predictable and boring.
The statement struck the right tone, especially about Afghanistan which could be tricky to comment on without wading into politics.
I think this is the start of the ramped up deflection from PA lawsuit and the (alleged) Rape of a trafficked minor accusations he has avoided responding to. I think it will only get more toxic and viscous. Sadly this tactic seems to work on those with a limited attention span, which covers there readership.
Because the dm is nothing if not hypocritical, today they are slamming the Sussex for not including UK charities. They have swung from how dare they make a statement to they should have added more.
I’m sorry but here I have to disagree. Just look at ‘the west’s’ intervention in latin america and the middle east. I come from a country that saw american soldiers walking through it’s streets once, killing fellow countrymen in the name of “freedom”. I like Harry and Meghan and believe they come from a good place, but seeing this statement and some of the comments in this comments section makes me feel like something is not right. There should be more pressure in your governments to acknowledge the destabilization that has happened in many places (one of them Afghanistan) being carried out in the hands of soldiers such as Harry. I’m sorry but good intentions or charity donations wont do. I’m writing this not to attack anyone, but for you to hear how many feel outside the US or the UK
@Not Right, Harry and Meghan are choosing to take action from a place of true caring for others who are suffering. They are not responsible for trying to solve the complexity of ills and political conflicts that exist around the world.
As genuine, compassionate leaders, the Sussexes are deciding to give their time and money to help alleviate some of the suffering in the world caused by conflicts they have no direct control over. Plus, they are using their platform to encourage others who are able, to do what they can to make a compassionate difference. They are showing us that we don’t have to feel helpless in the face of human tragedies. We can bury our heads in the sand, or look on in fear or apathy, or choose to act compassionately, with the realization that human suffering affects all of us whenever and wherever it is occurring.
Yes, Harry is a soldier and a patriot who served his country with great bravery and skill. He followed orders to the best of his abilities. That’s what soldiers do. He supported his regiment and bonded deeply with the men he fought next to and served with. And then, when he was called home because his status as a high profile prince endangered his troop, Harry never abandoned those he served with. He found ways to continue supporting active duty soldiers as well as veterans.
Neither Harry nor Meghan are political in the sense of being militants or being motivated to take revolutionary stances. Of course, there are complex political issues involved, as you have addressed, but that’s not their area of expertise. They are humanitarians first and foremost. Every high profile person has to make a choice of what they can focus on that can be of the most benefit. Many choose to do nothing. At least, the Sussexes are leaders with caring hearts who have chosen to focus on charity, compassion, and diplomacy. They are benefiting important causes worldwide via the work of their foundation, in addition to their personal donations, and generous donations contributed by their followers and supporters around the world.
What you are talking about needs to start at the level of calling or writing to legislators, joining activist groups, and helping to fund the filming of political-minded documentaries that can tell stories involving collective and individual truths that are not covered by mainstream news outlets.
A. Levin, Daily Mail and all of the royal rats are puppets to William and Kate. Boring and disgustingly racist lot.