Sarah Jessica Parker & Matthew Broderick ‘have never spent this much time together’

Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick cover the latest issue of the Hollywood Reporter. Not only are they one of the most successful couples in entertainment, they’ve managed to be working actors in film, television and theater throughout their whole careers. And they’ve always been based in New York. They’ve been married for 25 years! They’re currently working together on stage in a revival of Neil Simon’s Plaza Suite. The Broadway run was supposed to start in (gulp) March 2020. Two years and two months later, they’re finally back. They both promptly got Covid soon after the production restarted, but both are fine now. Anyway, while I think SJP was a giant brat about Kim Cattrall, I actually enjoyed this piece a lot. It was a window into SJP and Matthew’s marriage. They’re very comfortable with each other and like-minded. I mean, it would be weird if it was the opposite, but still. Some highlights:

SJP on having to cancel when they caught Covid: “We’ve both been much, much, much sicker and performed. It’s anathema to what we’re taught as actors, which is that you perform literally with a 102.3 fever, you vomit in the wings, you come back. It’s very odd to basically not have any symptoms and not be allowed to return to work.

SJP on whether they worried about working together on stage: “Not consciously. I think we were more so thinking about the play, like, “How are we going to do this?” And I only thought about being concerned when people ask us, “Are you concerned that this is going to be harmful to your marriage?” And then I was worried. “Well, should we be?” We’ve never spent this much time together ever, even before we had kids. [The couple has three children: James, 19, and twin daughters, Tabitha and Marion, 12.] Even when we were just dating. But it’s a very different kind of time. It’s not like we’re spending more time together talking. We’re spending time together working in an alternate universe. We’re not ourselves. And we don’t always go out together after the show. And now our days are freed up again. So we still have our autonomy during the day. So it’s feeling more kind of like it used to. But it’s been great.

SJP on how they’ve learned how to talk about each other while still being private: “I think we’ve kind of figured out how we can talk about the work and also be coy about us. Because it seems fair and right: If I was a person interviewing us, and we were doing a play about marriages and relationships, it would be awfully difficult to not ask where it overlaps with our lives. I’ve always said one of the reasons we’ve had success is because we don’t talk about our marriage. I’m not flattering myself that anyone’s discussing my marriage, but we’re certainly not going to add to it by saying, “Well, this is why it works.” Next thing you know, there’ll be a very public divorce. So we just try to respect each other. I think I learned early on when I was talking too much. I was like, “I’m in love. When’s he going to marry me?” Oh my God, I’m so sorry about that. I’m still apologizing for that.

SJP on the credible accusations against Chris Noth: “I don’t even know if I’m ready to talk about it, but I don’t think … I wasn’t reacting as a producer. I should have worked on this because I’m just … it’s just …[THR: Have you spoken to him since then?] No.”

Broderick on whether New York has lost its mojo: “It feels like we’re not sure what it is yet. “Great city if they ever finished it.” That’s what they always say about it. This whole city’s always about to fall apart in some way. [9/11] was very different. Because it was like, “Come outside, come eat, come sit next to other people.” And this time it’s been like, “Don’t come out, don’t help. Don’t spend money.” It’s a little harder to figure out how to come back.

What Broderick misses about New York in the ‘90s: “The ’90s were a little less gentrified, I guess. It was still more neighborhoods. They all start to get a little the same.

[From THR]

The excerpts make it seem like SJP did most of the talking but that’s not really how it was, Matthew was chatty. I think SJP just talks a lot more in general, regardless of who is around. When she apologized to Matthew again for talking too much about him early on in their relationship, he stops her and says “don’t do that.” There really is a sweetness to their marriage. Hm. Anyway…re: New York in the ‘90s, the complaint at that time was that Manhattan had turned into corporate and too safe and gentrified. Back then, people would talk about how much fun the 1970s were. Now people are nostalgic for the less-gentrified ‘90s. Hm.

Cover & IG courtesy of THR.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

45 Responses to “Sarah Jessica Parker & Matthew Broderick ‘have never spent this much time together’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MissMarirose says:

    WTH? He looks like Bob Dole in that photo.

    • Orangeowl says:

      I don’t know when his looks changed so much. I keep trying to catch a glimpse of Ferris Bueller but I can’t anymore.

    • Chaine says:

      He looks like a wax figure of an FBI age-progressed drawing of his original self, you know, like when someone is in the ten most wanted from having slaughtered their family and absconded forty years ago.

  2. ThatsNotOkay says:

    My childhood has gotten old.

    • smcollins says:

      Lol right? I endlessly watched FBDO and Ladyhawke, I had such a crush on MB! And the video store never had their copy of Girls Just Want To Have Fun because my sister & I would just re-rent it over and over and over…..

      I gotta say I’m loving the nostalgia feel of today’s posts between this, Star Wars and the Top Gun premiere coverage. I’ll take that over endless Royal Family coverage any day!

      • Kitten says:

        Oh man, Ferris Beuller…one of my first crushes. Sigh. We are old, friends.

      • Liz Version 700 says:

        Omg yes Ladyhawke was one of my favorite movies. My crush was real. Now my crush looks like LBJ…..le’ sigh

      • Mrs Bowie says:

        @SMCollins same sista. I’m here for 90s nostalgia today. Pfft… the Royal gossip is getting a bit tedious. But give me some Tom Cruise snark and a side eye of SJP and my Friday is looking way better.

  3. emmi says:

    I think when people miss a certain decade of any city, it’s not so much the city they miss but that time in their lives. I relate to that with my first year abroad. It was 17 years ago and that city – and I go back frequently and will love it forever – was of course “better” back then because I was 21 and it was exciting. The city I currently live in has a red light district that’s currently undergoing gentrification. It’s not a tourist magnet like Amsterdam or Hamburg, it’s just the place to get drugs and find a certain kind of entertainment. I’m sure in 15 years people will miss the “grittiness” but right now? Nobody loves it.

    • Bettyrose says:

      Exactly! I spent my early twenties in Chicago and romanticize the hell out of Chicago in the 90s when it was much less gentrified. But I know it’s my youth I’m romanticizing.

    • Kitten says:

      Yes you’re right. It’s also just fear of change.
      And it’s not just cities, it’s towns as well.

      We recently bought a house 8 miles outside of the city. The town is currently revamping its depressing town center with new sidewalks, new light posts, new vegetation (trees and flowers) and a new plaza area with benches and trees (used to be a bizarre parking lot). They also built a new multi-use building where an old abandoned building used to be.

      The town center looks objectively much MUCH better–by any metric. But in the neighborhood forum, all you hear from the townies is how awful it looks and “omg what is happening to our quaint town” BS. It’s insane. Like, I understand the comfort that comes with things remaining unchanged but so much of people’s negative reactions are based on nostalgia from their childhoods.

      • Bettyrose says:

        @Kitten – Congratulations on the new house! 🎊

      • AMA1977 says:

        My husband grew up in a small/medium sized city in Texas that has steadfastly refused to embrace multiple opportunities to grow/expand/improve (they are coastal and have a ton of potential) and everyone he knows in our generation is just waiting for the last of the “old guard” to fade away so that the place can grow and keep up. It’s really sad when people gatekeep something they profess to love and refuse progress. He loves his hometown (I’m not as big a fan, lol!) and wants to see it flourish. Time marches on, and nothing stays the same.

      • Kitten says:

        Thank you, Bettyrose! <3

        "It’s really sad when people gatekeep something they profess to love and refuse progress."

        Exactly, AMA! My hometown used to have a candy shop, a couple packies (what we call liquor stores in MA), a pizza shop, a small toy store, a bank and a nightclub in the town center. Now most of those places have been replaced with 4-5 star restaurants, small upscale boutiques, and a fancy craft beer and wine shop. Do I miss the scrappy old town that I used to know? Sure. But it is OBJECTIVELY a nicer place now. And that's what people need to understand: as folks get priced out of cities and move to the exurbs and burbs, they're going to want the entertainment and amenities that they had in the city. People want quietness and a slower pace but not boredom.

        And what makes me the angriest is all these old folks who bought their home for 10K 50 years ago deriding the building of multi-unit properties to help assuage our housing crisis. Just insanely selfish: "I got mine so why should you get yours?"
        MADDENING.

    • Maxine du Camp says:

      Yes … and also no. There’s no doubt that as I grow older, I grow a bit more nostalgic (and the pandemic has amped that up 1000%) but I truly do miss when Soho was full of art galleries and artist lofts and not stores you’d find in high end malls. And while the “affordable” parts of NYC were perhaps a bit dodgy, at least there were a few outposts within Manhattan where “normies” could live. Or when every season there was a must see exhibit at MoMA, and since the remodel in the early 2000s, it was like they spent all their money on the revamp and the exhibition program suffered.

  4. NMB says:

    They look great in those pics. I don’t know if it’s airbrushing or if it’s just less severe makeup than we usually see on SJP during red carpets or what. Nice that their marriage is still working for them and they’re happy.

  5. Bookie says:

    I had tickets on Christmas for The Music Man and the cast got COVID. I had tickets for Plaza Suite, and they got COVID.

    I had tickets for Funny Girl, and Beanie Feldstein was great but she got bad reviews.

    Just sharing for no reason….

    • TIFFANY says:

      I would love to return to NYC to take in a Broadway show. But in there panoramic times, it really will be a crap shoot if the show happens when I’m there.

      • Jan90067 says:

        I waiting until I was IN NY to get show tickets for two different shows, and then it was same day/day before. Pretty good seats, too. But then, the show can still be cancelled that day, due to Covid. Sigh…

        It really is a crap shoot at this point.

    • LightPurple says:

      I saw Plaza Suite during the pre-CoVID but it is looming, pre-Broadway tryout here in Boston. The play itself is dated, and a bit long, but SJP shines throughout and the the third act is hilarious, slaptstick farce. SJP herself is a sight-gag in that act and she manages to carry it off brilliantly.

    • sunny says:

      Oh that is so disappointing! I had tickets for Company in late March 2020 but then Covid hit and my trip from Toronto to NYC was cancelled and I have not made it back.

      I’m so sorry you keep having this run of bad luck. I feel Music Man with Sutton and Hugh would be so good. Sutton is everything on stage!

      Are you looking forward to Funny Girl? I heard the reviews were weak. It is such a hard role. I think Beanie is a terrific actress but I don’t find her vocals powerful and the amount of tough numbers in that show is a lot.

  6. Moxylady says:

    Their marriage creeps me out.

    • Noki says:

      Why is that ? To me it seems so normal and opposites attract in this case. He seems very serious,dare i say dull and not showbizzy and she is all designer,chatty and showy.

      • Moxylady says:

        For those reasons. He treats her like garbage. (Well known) and she acts like he hangs the sun, is happy with the slightest attention etc. I mean even the pic. She’s holding onto his neck and gazing at him like he’s Superman. He’s a well established a-hole who again- treats her like garbage. Just …. Whatever.
        He came to a fund raiser she threw for H Clinton and she was like … so grateful. It was so sad.

    • lisa says:

      same, based on what I saw when I was a bartender in nyc I assumed it was an open marriage. which is their business. but selling it like something it isnt when you could just say nothing is weird to me.

    • Jessamine says:

      Literally the only thing I know about their marriage/MB’s post FBDO-era is that he had an affair with their nanny

      • Lola says:

        In the early 2000s MB was absolutely notorious for doing nothing but hanging out in bars frequented by NYU students and hitting on undergraduate girls non-stop in a sleazy and creepy way

      • Lady Keller says:

        I always thought he was in the closet. I thought that was the gossip. Apparently I was way off.

      • Lisa says:

        @lady keller – I worked mostly in gay bars so I mostly saw him hit on very young males, using his own name.

    • HatDay says:

      Thank you! These juicy comments are why I keep returning to CB! Clicked through when I saw this post because I knew there’d be some semi-insider gossip about the reality of this marriage in the comments section.

      I’ll just add he’d never have been able to afford their current lifestyle without her astronomical SATC pay cheques (of which Kim Cattrall and her charisma and comic timing should be awarded 75% (no, I’m not Kim)).

  7. TIFFANY says:

    The story they share repeatedly was that SJP talked their entire first date and she thought that Matthew was not interested in a second one because of it. He was just reserved and liked that about her.

    Jennifer Grey’s bio states that Madonna’s ‘Express Yourself’ was inspired by her breakup with Matthew.

    So maybe he knew he needed to change.

  8. Katherine says:

    She is hateful. Team Kim Cattrall forever. SJP ruined SATC for me.

  9. Lena says:

    They’re part of that group who kinda dated amongst each other but all made long lasting marriages so props to them:Sarah and Matthew, kyra Sedgwick and Kevin bacon, Tracey pollen and Michael j fox.

  10. TL says:

    I like them together. It seems very normal

  11. Julia K says:

    I have followed SJP since her Square Pegs days. She and MB seem like 2 pieces of a jigsaw puzzle that look like they should fit but no matter how you turn those pieces there is something not quite right. I think she tries too hard, him, not enough. All marriages are business deals, some more than others, so looks like they’re in it for the long haul and content.

  12. magster336 says:

    He’s starting to look more like his dad, James Broderick (minus James’ wavy hair).

  13. searchlight soul says:

    watch him in War Games. he really was like 12 yrs old or some sh*t.

  14. Twee says:

    When did SJP marry Angela Chase’s dad????

  15. FeministYeah says:

    Hey if I were Broderick, I wouldn’t want to spend time with “bestie” SJP.
    No gracias.
    No hablo inglés.
    #TeamKim4Life

  16. Elsa says:

    I saw them in the musical “How to Succeed in Business” back in the 90’s. They were fabulous!