This is Julianne Moore on the red carpet for the 13th Annual Hollywood Film Festival Awards Gala Ceremony in Beverly Hills last night. She was being recognized for her supporting work in Tom Ford’s A Single Man, for which many think she’ll be nominated for yet another Oscar. Now, here’s the thing: I f-cking love Julianne Moore. She’s amazing. She’s one of the most talented actresses out there, and I think very highly of her beauty. But Julianne is not Cate Blanchett. Julianne is not a style icon. She’s a beautiful woman who gets it wrong on the red carpet often enough that I think to myself “Why doesn‘t my girl get a better stylist?”. Last night was one of those times. I don’t know who designed this puff-sleeved, peach-pink monstrosity, but I hope they’re pleased with themselves. This junk is so ugly, I really feel for poor Julianne. What was she thinking? “Tonight, I want to look like a budget bridesmaid!”?
In happier news, Julianne is out there promoting her work in both Chloe and A Single Man. So we have a new interview! Yeah! It’s this piece from Indie Wire called “10 Things You Want to Know About Julianne Moore”. Unfortunately, I only wanted to know about six of these things, so here are the highlights (full article is here):
Her character in “A Single Man” was inspired by Tom Ford’s grandmother.
“He had a very glamorous grandmother,” Moore said of Ford. “She lived in Santa Fe. When I went for my first costume fitting, he was very specific about the dress. He pulled out quite a few options, but when he whipped out this one dress, and I put it on, he was like, “That’s the dress.” And the dress had come from a vintage store in Santa Fe, where his grandmother lived. So he got very emotional and said he could not believe the dress I was going to wear was from there. But, yeah, she had the hair and the makeup and the jewelry, and was it fun… So that’s where a lot of that came from.”She does not believe there is a downside to awards attention.
“Noooo,” she yelped when moderator Briony Hanson asked if getting awards attention had a downside. “Are you kidding? It helps you get another job! Bring it on! You’re like, ‘thank you.’ It’s great.”Though she did see a downside to getting nominated twice in one year (as she did in 2002 for “Far From Heaven” and “The Hours”).
“Obviously it’s nothing to sneeze at,” she said of the double nomination. “But in that same way that every film is your baby… you like each one to have its moment. So when you have two at the same time, it’s like having twins. It probably would be nicer to be able to focus on one or the other but, you know, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth, as they say.”She’s not afraid of aging.
“I’ve been asked about aging in Hollywood since I started,” Moore said. “I think because I started making movies when I was 30 or 31. So the first question out of everybody’s mouth is ‘what does it feel like to be an older actress working in Hollywood.’ And I keep getting it. And my answer to it always has been that you can’t be anywhere except where you are. I’m 48. I’m going to be 48 until I’m not anymore and then I’ll be 49. And if I spend all my time at 48 wishing that I was 35, I’m not going to experience 48. And I’m not going to play parts I played at 31 either. It’s not going to happen. So I feel like as far as aging is concerned for anybody in their life, at any point… you have to go, ‘this is where I am today, and appreciate it.’ Because none of it lasts very long.”Moore cautions a previous statement she’d made where she said that she makes some films “to pay her mortgage.”
“That sounds like a horrific statement,” Moore said when Hanson quoted her. “Because I’ve also been really pleased and happy doing the more commercial work that I’ve done. I’ve worked with people like Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott and Ivan Reitman. Directors that are really talented and interesting but just happen to be making great big movies. So it’s nothing to sneeze at, but you also have to, as an actor, work within the range of films that are out there. It’s like, if you ate tomatoes every day, you’re like ‘okay, enough tomatoes. I can’t stand it anymore.’ So I think it’s that way with anything we do in our lives. You want to have some variety, and some different experiences.”But she admits that they do pay the mortgage, and allow her to make smaller films.
“There’s this misnomer about actors that whatever we do we get paid for,” she said. “I made a movie this summer with Lisa Cholodenko [‘The Kids Are Alright’]. And it actually cost me money. Because you have to uproot your whole family. So some movies allow you to have a career and a regular job. And some movies you just do because you want to do them, but you’re not getting paid. It’s all part of a whole thing. And I’ve been super, super fortunate that I’ve had varied opportunities.”
[From Indie Wire]
I’m actually looking forward A Single Man. It looks really interesting, and the cast is superb. The film is adapted from Christopher Isherwood’s 1964 book of the same name. According to the reviews (which are stellar), the film is a day-in-the life story, following and narrated by George (Colin Firth), a British university lecturer in L.A. whose male partner has died. George has decided to kill himself, but is constantly reminded of how much life there is beyond his grief. Julianne, in a glamorous turn, plays George’s best friend. Maybe Julianne will finally get the Oscar!
Trailer for “A Single Man”:
Images thanks to WENN.com and BauerGriffinOnline.
Its a bridesmaid dress that has been altered- you know- because the bride said “Oh you can totally wear this after the wedding!”
Ugh. usually I agree with you CB, but this time I think you got it wrong on her talent. I think she is overrated as an actress. She is definitely no Cate Blanchett. She’s not even a Diane Lane… sorry.
On a different person, I would say this could be stylin’. Especially if you replace the shoes and get rid of that tacky plastic-pink belt. Also, maybe the sheer panel right above the bodice. I dunno, I see potential!
I do hope this ends up on Go Fug Yourself =)
I’m a big fan of hers, too – and I think she looks just fine. Sure – she could have done better, but we all have our days where we wish we’d done (or worn) something different.
I’ll start with the positives – she seems like such a nice, down-to-earth person. This interview just makes me want to hang out with her! What a refreshing & classy lady.
Now, I’m sorry Julianne but the pink textured fabric of the dress is unfortunate looking with your lovely freckled skin.
A beautiful woman, but this is the wrong color and wrong style for her.
She desperately needs a bra. And the color is all wrong for her complexion. And the sleeves are awful. But I think she’s beautiful.
That is an ugly dress IMO, but I do love Julianne. I have liked her in a lot of films. My favorites are the Big Lebowski and Boogie Nights.
she looks quite peachy, if i may say so myself.
She kicks ass in Boogie Nights & Lebowski, but my faves are Magnolia, The End of the Affair, Cookie’s Fortune (that’s a really underrated film, I think) and Hannibal. I f-cking love her in Hannibal!
Yes Kaiser, I totally warmed to her playing Clarice Starling, when I thought that I wouldn’t (having been a major fan of Foster’s portrayal of the character, to the point of naming my car Clarice!). I will have to check out Magnolia, as I have yet to see it, and Cookie’s Fortune. Thanks for the ideas!
Maybe her colors were “blush and bashful”
You know, I think it’s nice when stars admit that they get paid for their work. Sure, some roles are going to pay for their mortgage. Better that kind of statement than Natalie Portman’s excessively privileged “actors who work for the money are whores” kind of statement. Really, Natalie? So you always work for free? Your Star Wars movies were the acting equivalent of pro bono?
I’d rather hear an actor say what Julianne Moore says here: that this is her job, and she’s lucky to be able to fit roles that don’t pay (or that cost her money) into her budget.
Julianne Moore is so beautiful. Absolutely stunning in the movie trailer. I won’t hold the peach mistake against her. Let’s all do her a kindness and not look at it anymore.
It’s not pink, its orange and given her red hair and alabaster complexion, it’s entirely appropriate.
By the way, that’s silk organza she’s wearing and I think she looks stunning. She just needs to improve her posture.
I hope I look that great when I am her age.. Oh wait…I AM her age 🙂
not her best look!
Dreadful outfit. The transparently-pasty bare legs are also a nice touch. I’m w/Juice in LA, incredibly overrated. And I hated– HATED her as Clarice Starling. What a let-down after Jodie Foster.
Naked legs at her age??? Gah!
The color of the dress is perfect on her. What is wrong is the style and fabric IMO. And why are her teeth always so gray looking?
Too much knee lipo.
Wow. She’s really thick in the waist. The dress and the shoes are really ugly.
She is definitely showing her age. Time for her to become a character sctress.
I love this woman with every fibre of my being. The dress, not so much.