Scotland Yard is slow-walking their inquiry into Prince Charles’ honours scheme

I’m sure this story won’t get many comments, but I continue to be flabbergasted by how Prince Charles is totally getting away with everything. For decades, Charles has been raising millions of dollars for his various foundations and charities. Charles will take a check from anyone. He will ASK for a check from anyone, including Osama bin Laden’s family, Vladimir Putin’s oligarch friends and various oil-rich Middle Eastern “businessmen.” Charles even offers services for donations, like honours and promises of British citizenship. It’s been clear for the past year that Charles was going to hang this whole mess around Michael Fawcett’s neck. Fawcett is some creepy aide who worked his way up to being one of Charles’s main charity executives. Charles fired him when the reporting around all of this “fundraising” began last year. Only it doesn’t even seem like anyone has an appetite to even investigate Charles’s fall guy.

Scotland Yard has still not questioned the royal aide at the centre of a “cash for honours” scandal uncovered almost a year ago. Detectives have failed to interview Michael Fawcett, Prince Charles’s longest-serving aide, even though he is said to have contacted the Metropolitan Police to offer his “full co-operation”.

Fawcett, 59, was forced to quit last year as chief executive of the Prince’s Foundation, one of Charles’s flagship charities, following claims he helped to fix an honour for a Saudi tycoon who donated more than £1.5 million to royal causes. Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz, 52, was made an honorary CBE by the future king at a private ceremony at Buckingham Palace after pledging large sums to help restore royal residences in Scotland close to Charles.

Fawcett — the man whom the prince once said he could not live without — co-ordinated the application process and helped “upgrade” the proposed honour from a lesser OBE, according to leaked emails.

Scotland Yard’s Special Enquiry Team — the same unit that handled the much-criticised inquiry into Covid breaches during parties held at Downing Street — began examining the allegations soon after they appeared in The Sunday Times last September. In February, it launched a full investigation into potential offences committed under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. The development raised the prospect of Charles, 73, having to give evidence under police caution. However, nearly six months later, no arrests have been made and key players have not been interviewed.

The Met says it will not be giving “a running commentary” on the investigation and has refused to say how many officers are working on the case.

[From The Times]

This whole thing is in the process of being buried. Charles – or someone close to him – has been trying to get all of this sh-t out in a steady pace before his coronation, and they didn’t even need to bother with any of it. The bin Laden story was ignored. The suitcases-full-of-cash story was shrugged off. The investigation into the fact that Charles was blatantly selling access and honours is being blatantly slow-walked and eventually buried. By this time next year, Michael Fawcett will be back in some kind of CEO position with one of Charles’s foundations.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty, Avalon Red, Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “Scotland Yard is slow-walking their inquiry into Prince Charles’ honours scheme”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. HeatherC says:

    They’re walking this so slowly they appear to be walking it all back. No, they ARE walking it all back. There will be no repercussions for Charles, or any of them, for all the messiness bordering on illegality if not all out illegal. It will all be quickly forgotten the next time Kate presents a pie graph to show her brilliance or Meghan eats an avocado like the terrorist she is (JOKING AND SARCASM)

  2. Duchess of Hazard says:

    I guess they are waiting on Charles to be king so that he cannot be prosecuted

    • Mary says:

      Oooohhh… Good guess. I think you are probably right on this one. I am also wondering if things have soured between Prince Charles and Fawcett and whether or not Fawcett is the one leaking the info on these cash donations from dodgy sources.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    Scotland Yard exists to the protect the British establishment not the masses. So it’s no surprise that they’re slow walking this thing.

    • Christine says:

      This. I just don’t know what it will take for the British public to finally have enough.

  4. MsIam says:

    I guess they are too busy making sure Harry and his family never get security. That’s their real priority. Nothing to see anywhere else.

    • JB says:

      Exactly this. The Met’a priorities seem to come straight from the palace. How is this acceptable? It shows to those of us outside England/GB just how entrenched the monarchy is.

  5. Cessily says:

    They may have investigated if the Media and the Tories were not just as corrupt as the Royals. The empire days are over, I don’t see a very bright future for anyone on that isolated little isle that isn’t aristocratic.

    • MeganC says:

      If the BRF think they are ordained by god they shouldn’t act like a-holes. Maybe lead by example or whatever.

      • Eurydice says:

        When you’re ordained by god that automatically means everything you do is right.

  6. Sunday says:

    I’m sure Fawcett offered his “full cooperation” just like Andrew’s lawyers assured the FBI that he would fully cooperate before completely ghosting them.

    Kaiser is exactly right though, it’s absolutely bonkers that there isn’t a real public outcry or journalistic appetite for investigating the future head of state accepting money from a who’s who of shady businessmen and despots. I’m disappointed but not surprised that the UK media has halfheartedly reported each scandal with a shrug before immediately moving on as if it never happened, but I *am* surprised that so far there haven’t been any US political journalists reporting on any of it whatsoever. NYTimes, Washington Post, nada?

    My biggest question is WTAF are they using all this money for? They’re funded by taxpayers, security costs, housing costs, etc are all covered, they 100% get free clothing and other misc. freebies even though they deny it, Charles’ Duchy makes millions, and even if they had to spend their own money (the HORROR!), the royal family is sitting on wealth they’ve hoarded and hidden for HUNDREDS of years, so why exactly do they need all this dirty money? It’s so obviously money laundering, which makes it even crazier that it’s not being investigated.

    • UNCDANCER says:

      Grifters, every one. I am surprised that the citizenry seem to shrug this off.
      I would think the ongoing economic crisis would help draw some outrage around this. But as an American I know how hard it is to get people to care about the crimes being committed right in front of them.

  7. Mslove says:

    I’m flabbergasted too, Kaiser. This is why I read Celebitchy.

    It’s also heartbreaking to think of all the people who are hungry, sick, homeless and broke in the UK. While the monarchy sits on a pile of wealth that can’t even be estimated.

  8. Eurydice says:

    These things don’t happen in a vacuum. Charles can’t just accept bags of cash – what’s he going to do, hide them under his bed? The money has to go into the bank, the bank has to report large deposits and Charles’ foundation has to report the gift. Charles can’t just hand out honors and citizenships – those have to come from the government. And foreign dignitaries can’t just swan into the country and meet with the prince without someone in the government knowing about it. If Charles has gotten away with anything, it’s because the government has allowed it. So, how likely are they to investigate themselves?

    • Laura says:

      Really good point, E. I never thought of it that way, but you’re right. There’s no way all of these giant donations happened without multiple levels of other officials knowing about it.

      Ug. How depressing.

    • Christine says:

      Agreed, Laura, and I hadn’t thought of it that way either. It is deeply depressing.

  9. SarahCS says:

    The police not doing anything about a member of the BRF? I am shocked, shocked I tell you. I just hope there are some people out there paying attention and keeping notes for when we finally are ready to put a match to this corrupt institution.

    #abolishthemonarchy

  10. Tessa says:

    So that Bowers book was not “distraction” enough except for people pointing out the fake information in it. So what next? Oh the “outrage of Harry’s book” the other books coming out, and maybe pictures of the Cambridge children as distractions. This Charles matter does need serious investigation.

    • Laura D says:

      It does need serious investigation but, there’s already a precedence. TQ was not adverse to accepting jewellery and racehorses as gifts and no-one batted an eyelid. If anything the media (and to a certain extent the public) saw the generosity by these people as a way of measuring how important the monarchy are on a global stage.

      Publicising this money as a donations to Charles’ charity is unpalatable but, at the risk of repeating myself it’s something the RF has always done. I’ll wager that many British subjects really can’t see what all the fuss is about. They’ve become so used to seeing the RF receive generous gifts from overseas “admirers”; these donations are just more of the same.

      The Guardian tried to show how TQ and Charles have used their privilege to protect their assets and there was very little (if any) outrage in the mainstream media. Even when they lost their appeal to view Phillip’s will there were next to no protests from the tabloids. However, an argument over whether a bridesmaid should (or shouldn’t wear) tights is seen as threat to the constitutional monarchy! Go figure!

  11. Lizzie Bathory says:

    My guess is Fawcett “offered his cooperation” & it was mutually understood that he remained under Charles’s protection & would never be questioned. Charles & Fawcett have reportedly had a quite intimate relationship, in all senses of the word. I suspect Charles views any negativity towards Fawcett the same way he views negativity towards Camilla–he’s emotionally invested in both, so they are both reflections on Charles himself. Ergo, both must be protected at all costs.

  12. Jaded says:

    Someone should produce a Netflix or AppleTV or Hulu or whatever streaming series called “Filthy Rich Royals” and expose the whole stinking, grifting lot of them.

  13. Jasper says:

    The average person has to jump through so many hoops just to get a loan only to wind up selling their souls to the bank. Meanwhile we have Charles here literally being handed money from the sketchiest of characters with nary a background check done.
    I must say, on a very superficial note though, Fawcett has a lovely head of hair.

  14. Jane says:

    Who’s hurt by bags of money going to charities? That’s the bottom line, and the answer is, well, no one. Bad people should give money to charity. People struggling to pay rent and put food on the table don’t care about dusty honors scandals.

    • harpervalleypta says:

      What kind of charities are these? Are these food banks? Or are these shell companies for Prince Charles? Because the only charities I see mentioned in these stories are charities to maintain and run his own estates, which isn’t any kind of charity in my mind, just set up as one as a tax dodge.

  15. jferber says:

    To think these grifters not only have the nerve to bilk the entire United Kingdom (and still have the riches of colonized countries in past centuries), they EVEN have to get funded by criminal, enemy governments that are dictator-led and in an illegal/immoral war against the Ukraine? So how is this f—er doing his “share” for Ukraine? Taking Soviet money that will NOT be used for war, but for his own luxuries? He is a collaborator with Russia, in my opinion, if he reaps the money stolen from the Russian people. My God.

    • Christine says:

      This is exactly what I get hung up on. No Russian, in the history of Russia, has offered a suitcase of cash to the royal family of England out of the kindness of their heart, there is always a quid pro quo. Charles gives tacit approval for the war every time he takes one of these shady “donations to charity”.