Emma Thompson removes her name from the Roman Polanski petition

wenn2622654

A few weeks ago, I mentioned in an Emma Thompson post that she was one of the many entertainment people who signed the Roman Polanski petition. I didn’t want it to be true, this cruel, cruel cut. The thought of Emma faltering after so many years of being awesome was just too difficult for me to face. Now it looks like I can love my Emma once again – because she’s asking to have her name removed from the petition. According to Jezebel (linked from LaineyGossip), when Emma gave a scheduled speech at Exeter University a few nights ago, she was challenged (politely) by a student named Caitlin. Caitlin was heartbroken, like many of us, that Emma had signed the petition, so she organized another petition, a “take your name off that other petition, Ms. Thompson” petition. Caitlin got 410 signatures and numerous comments, all of which she brought to the meeting she had set with Emma. Here’s what happened next, according to Caitlin (via Jezebel):

Emma did not have much time between meetings, but she gave me all of the time that she had. I asked her why she had signed the petition, and she explained about how well she knows Polanski, how terrible his life has been, and how forgiving the survivor of the rape all those years ago now is.

She said she thought the intentions of the judge were unclear, as were the intentions of those who arrested him recently. She told me that a lot of her friends had rung her up asking her to sign the petition, so there had been a certain amount of pressure. She said that she had already been thinking a lot about the petition, as others had expressed their dismay at her signing it.

I handed her our petition and the comments. She read them both through thoroughly, and came back to me. She said, while she supported Polanski as a friend, a crime is a crime. I don’t know whether she had realised the extent of Polanski’s crime, but she is now fully aware. She will remove her name from the petition – in fact, she said she would call today and sort it out. Even though, she stressed, Polanski has had some truly terrible experiences in his lifetime, experiences that we couldn’t even imagine and which should not be taken out of the equation, she agreed that she could not put her name to a petition asking for his release.”

Assuming that she will be true to her word, her name will be removed in the very near future. Hopefully the press will pick up on it.

She left me with this, to pass on to everyone who has signed the petition/raised awareness of this issue: “Know that I will remove my name because of you, and all of the good work that you have been doing. I have read your petition. I have heard you. And I will listen.”

[From Jezebel]

While I totally applaud Emma for seeing the error of her ways, and changing her mind with thoughtful grace, I know I’m not really alone in thinking Emma’s reasons for initially signing the damn thing were a bit sketchy. Jezebel points that out too. They sum up celebrity reasoning as: “he’s suffered, he’s charming, the victim wants it dropped, judicial shenanigans, all the cool kids are signing — minus any thought of what he actually did to the victim in 1977, before fleeing the country.” While I think some of those reasons should be factored into what happens to Polanski once he comes back to America, they should not be a factor in people wanting his immediate release. Still, I’m going to give Emma credit – she listened to her critics, weighed her thoughts carefully, and changed her mind, acknowledging her error. That’s more than any other signer has done.

Here’s Emma with Carey Mulligan and Dominic Cooper at the Times BFI London Film Festival’s screening of “An Education” on October 20th. Images thanks to WENN.com .

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

44 Responses to “Emma Thompson removes her name from the Roman Polanski petition”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. barneslr says:

    That’s wonderful. I’m so glad she kept an open mind and was willing to admit her error. I’ve always liked her, but now I love her!

  2. Firestarter says:

    Good for her.

  3. lilred says:

    I like her too,however aren’t these things she should have thought about before signing that petition in the first place? Instead of signing because others asked her to.

    Tough bananas Polanski has had a rough life , prison is full of people singing that same tune.

    Suck it up buttercup!

  4. temeneos says:

    I agree, although I would say “toughen up princess”

    I mean really, he’s a sprite of a man, he will have to be in isolation

  5. TwinkleToes says:

    Only a dumbf**k would sign that petition. Total career suicide. What I don’t get is, all you have to know is that Polanski was 43 yrs. old at the time and the victim, 14. You just need to know those facts plus the anal sex and it’s a done deal. Done! He wasn’t 25, he was 43 years old. She doesn’t get a pass from me. I just think she is a sheep not a leader. I despise dumb followers with no conviction regarding morals. How old is she? Still bowing to peer pressure, at her age? She’s a poor man’s Streep, anyway.

  6. BitterBetty says:

    Better late then never, I guess. her initial reasoning made me cringe, though. I thought she was smarter then that.

  7. KateNonymous says:

    I’m glad she was open to more input and changed her mind. But exactly how hard has his life been?

  8. BitterBetty says:

    TwinkleToes: <3 <3 <3

  9. queenie says:

    So if I have some “truly terrible experiences” in my lifetime, that gives me a free pass to commit crimes against children?

  10. dirty martini says:

    OK she made a huge mistake. She is correcting her mistake.

    I havent falling back in love with her yet. But I do remember why I once loved her to begin with, and maybe if she really really works at healing the relationship, we can come back from this as strong as ever.

    But it will take time and commitment.

  11. Reina says:

    @KateNonymous: Well, his family was persecuted during WW2, forced to live in a Jewish ghetto (which he escaped at a young-ish age), and then his father died in a concentration camp.

    Past that, his wife was 8.5 months pregnant and brutally murdered by the Manson family at the Polanksi house while he was out of town.

    Not defending the guy at all because I think what he did is totally terrible, but answering a question.

  12. Lenore says:

    I think with the Polanski issue, a lot of people just don’t know the full case, the details – almost everyone I’ve spoken to was under the impression that it was a case of consensual underage sex, that a thirteen-year-old groupie happily went to bed with a big-name director in the sordid atmosphere of 1970s LA, when it was common for big star names to bed teenage scenesters after a night at Bingenheimer’s.

    When you actually sit down and explain to them that the girl said no, more than once, asked to go home and was ignored and raped – that it was plainly rape and would have been had Samantha Geimer been thirty rather than thirteen – they’re shocked. The facts just aren’t presented in those terms and I wonder if most of the signatories were aware of the real circumstances when they signed.

    I’m not one of the “hang Polanski” brigade but he must be held accountable by law, or the law is meaningless – and that’s a slap in the face of every woman and man who’s ever been raped.

  13. jay says:

    Might I ask a question of any legal eagles here? There is no doubt in my mind what he did was abhorrent to the extreme, and he had a deal relatively in place. Because of the fleeing the country thing I doubt it will be upheld, naturally. But what I want to know, as I am a legal neophyte, is will he be sentenced according to the laws at the time or the current ones? I ask because many times it seems like when a perpetrator is finally brought to justice, many times they are sentenced under old laws, based on the time the act was committed, and in many of those instances the sentence would be harsher now.

    Just wondering if he is likely to be let off relatively easily in comparison to now.

    I still think there is absolutely no justification for his acts, harsh life or not. Many people have suffered…doesn’t give them carte blanche to break the law.

    He just thinks he is above it all.

  14. Pole says:

    Oh, Emma – what a relief!

  15. Disco says:

    TwinkleToes–I wish it were career suicide for them to sign the petition, but we all know these people are going to continue to successfully make movies (and make millions of dollars doing it). It makes me sick….

  16. Tammy King says:

    I agree with Emma Thompson. While I think he is one of the great directors of our time, there is no exuse for the crime that he did. I do think the judge was shady in his dealings with the matter but that doesn’t change Polasnki commited this crime. He himself has never denied it. I know he has had some really horrible things happen to him such as being in a concentration camp when he was a child and having mother exterminated there in the gas showers. Also, the brutal murder of his wife, Sharon Tate and his unborn son by the Manson family. But that still change the fact that he committed a serious crime.
    Chris Rock really put it in perspective on the Jay Leno show last month. Here is the statement he made.

    Chris Rock says he doesn’t understand why fellow filmmakers are coming to the defense of Roman Polanski, saying of the charges against him, “It’s rape.”

    “People are defending Roman Polanski because he made some good movies? Are you kidding me?” Rock said on Thursday’s Jay Leno Show. “He made good movies 30 years ago, Jay! Even Johnnie Cochran didn’t have the nerve to go, ‘Well, did you see O.J. play against New England?'”

  17. danielle says:

    Good! I hope we get confirmation through the press that she has officially taken her name off.

  18. DDKH says:

    Well, it’s a very small but public victory for common sense and reason in this androgonystic and utero centric culture that created these victorian laws to begin with some 100+ years ago and keep attempting to impose them on the rest of the world through the UN and “any means possible”. Whatever it takes to hold men accountable for the decisions that females make. Why do you think he fled to France?

  19. Huma says:

    I’m glad she rectified it, but her standing will not recover with me.

    Same goes for Natalie Portman and all the disgusting people that signed the petition along with these two ladies.

  20. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “Whatever it takes to hold men accountable for the decisions that females make.”

    um…what female made the decision for Polanski to drug and rape the 13 year-old girl?

    or did I misinterpret your post?

  21. k says:

    jay– to answer your legal question, generally, yes, criminals are subject to the legal sanction in place at the time the crime was committed. So he’d be subject to the guidelines governing rape in 1978 if he was convicted of that crime. As he pled guilty only to the deviant sexual intercourse element, he’d be sentenced for that unless he withdraws his plea and goes to trial. He’ll also be sentenced (if convicted) for flight under 1978 laws, but the 30+ years of evading custody would be considered an aggravating factor.

    (Of course, I’m not a CA lawyer, so this is all generally speaking.)

  22. Samantha says:

    Natalie Portman signed it? 🙁 I don’t like her anymore.

  23. cuppycake says:

    I’m glad she’s removing it, but her logic is flawed.
    What? His life was tough so that makes it not his fault? Does that mean that everyone who had a hard life gets a free pass? No.
    That girl was barely even a teenager…anyone who wants to free someone like that is slime.

  24. lucy2 says:

    I’m glad she’s removing her name, I’m surprised she signed it to begin with. Everyone who signed it should have thought it through first, and they would have come to the same conclusion that she eventually did. He’s had a tough life, yes, he’s a great director, yes, he’s a personal friend, yes – but a CRIME is a CRIME. When you’re talking about a crime, especially one against a child, all that other stuff becomes irrelevant.

  25. Kim says:

    it is astonishing how actors and other industry people cannot separate a person’s work with a criminal act they have done. Then stating how the public doesn’t understand artists.

    I’m glad she took her head out of her ass and realized that the art or “a hard life” is not an excuse to get away with a horrible crime.

    I want to boycott those who signed the petition; however I can separate art and their personal stupidity.

  26. Ron says:

    Listen, I don’t care how talented you are or how hard your life has been, it’s no excuse for what you did and you must be held resposible. I wonder if all of the people who signed the petetion would feel the same way if it was their daughter or sister? I bet not.

  27. fizXgirl314 says:

    ddkk you must be nuts… because in victorian times women had NO rights and men were accountable for NOTHING… so you must have been reading about some victorian times when the world was “uterocentric” in some parallel universe…

    moron…

  28. DDKH says:

    I meant the petition and the publicity was the victory although no real change is expected here. Also, that was the charge that was made, that doesn’t make it so and it rarely is!…if you investigate the facts and know anything about this particular case or “the system” that I had the pleasure of working in for so many putrid years and/or had experienced this culture from a man’s standpoint for even a pico second you would get IT….IT….IT…with no explaination required!

  29. sg says:

    Just want to point out about his marriage to sharon tate: even she was significantly younger than him, and I remember reading that, he used to bring other women home and force sharon tate into things she wasn’t comfortable with, I don’t remember specifics, but people keep saying, “poor roman, his wife was brutally murdered” but he was kind of messed up and like this even before that…

  30. Film2TV says:

    You should read the Petition itself, it’s really condescending to wards us backwards US citizens, they actually list his arrest as a “case of morals”. Morals! Not rape of a 13 yr old, drugged up. Of course they try to plead that they are protesting that he was arrested at a film festival, that somehow freedom was undermined, but it’s all bull crap and window dressing. I wish someone would make up t shirts with the names on them and call them supporters of child rape. Then lets see how fast they get their names off that list.

  31. laura says:

    i love(d?) her but i find it so arrogant that “stars” even went this route – why wouldn’t their concern be to let the judicial process continue to run its course? he pled guilty and fled (therefore reasonably the courts find him GUILTY and a FUGITIVE), so regardless of what the victim wants, its a criminal judicial proceeding, not civil. stars elevate themselves by even thinking their opinions can influence law.

  32. boo says:

    So true Laura.

  33. GatsbyGal says:

    So she was talked into signing it in the first place, and then she was talked into taking her name off? Does this woman ever just stop and think for herself?

  34. Meh says:

    Here is an interesting article on the legal side of the Polanski case once he is returned to the US.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-30/polanskis-lost-alibi/full/

    Written by Marcia Clark, the former L.A. district attorney who prosecuted the O.J. Simpson murder case.

  35. Linda says:

    Who else signed it??

  36. sonola trip says:

    While I love Emma, love her, love her … I was very disappointed to read this:

    “Even though, she stressed, Polanski has had some truly terrible experiences in his lifetime, experiences that we couldn’t even imagine and which should not be taken out of the equation ….”

    So she’s removing her name from the petition but still insists his past life experience should not be removed from the equation? She’s still defending him, and what’s worse is she’s defending him on the basis of some very poor logic.

    This tells me that Thompson STILL doesn’t get it. Polanski’s tough life has nothing to do with his crime. Nothing. It’s difficult to see such an intelligent woman say something so ignorant. Polanski’s taste for minors is his sexual preference. It wasn’t created by WWII ghettos and his reputation with minors was well in place long before Tate was murdered. Years after his arrest and flight from justice Polanski boasted in interviews about his attraction to young girls and basically said all men want to have sex with female minors. If Emma is such a good friend of Polanski’s I assume she knows about this. How does Emma reconcile this kind of sick braggadocio with Polanski’s tough life?

    I’m glad Emma is taking her name off the petition but that she is doing so while still defending Polanski spoils it for me.

  37. ! says:

    I’m sorry, she isn’t going to get a round of applause from me for coming around to the conclusion she should have had in the first place. Even if the girl HAD been all over Polanski IT WOULD STILL BE WRONG.

  38. For Sooth? says:

    I would love to boycott every one of them but I don’t go to the movies anymore since I’m not seventeen or into being scared and I don’t buy them either. The best I can do is bypass them on tv or not rent their videos.

    Is there a published petition with all the names somewhere? I’d love to be made aware of the vermin I want to boycott. I rage inside to think that a lot of these folks have sisters or even daughters and STILL they put their signature down thinking that they are taking the high road.

  39. Mel says:

    Get more celebrities to rescind their signatures: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=167664386022&ref=mf

  40. fizXgirl314 says:

    ddkh no I think some explanation is definitely required as I don’t see men getting raped beaten and subjugated with even as REMOTE a frequency as women do… and quite frankly, all the atrocities of the world, wars, rapes, holocausts, were instigated by men… so I’m kind of finding it hard to feel sorry for our fellow penised creatures :/

  41. DDKH says:

    Well you are wrong Madam!

    And simply because YOU don’t see it in your clearly jaded perspective of things, doesn’t make it so!

    Tschuess!

    Kurt

  42. stacy says:

    I was disappointed in her reasoning for doing this, but i’m glad she did it. Maybe people will follow her example. That piece of shit Polanski does not deserve being released. Boo hoo, blame it on a rough life…what did that child do to him that warranted his actions? This topic has done pissed me off. So now what…every convicted sex offender can get a petition going? Our judicial system is so fucked.

  43. Robert says:

    I agree with Kate. How hard was his life exactly? I’m sure he wasn’t living in squalor and dinning on spam. Not even close I would say.

    But apparently to Emma it more than makes up for the rape of a child.

    It’s good she decided to take her name off. To that I say better late than never. But she gets no applaud from me. She pulled her name off cause of the fans request. Not because she believes he needs to be punished.

  44. Jag says:

    Here’s what I found. You can click on the second link for the entire list, it says: http://www.sacd.fr/Le-cinema-soutient-Roman-Polanski-Petition-for-Roman-Polanski.1340.0.html and then just the names: http://www.sacd.fr/Tous-les-signataires-de-la-petition-All-signing-parties.1341.0.html

    Thompson and Portman aren’t listed, so not sure if Portman pulled out as well, since it says it’s dated October 29.