Angelina Jolie dominates the tabloids with her “cruelty & spite”

img205

I don’t even know what to say. Angelina Jolie is on the cover of five tabloids this week, and every single one of them is negative. Angelina scored solo covers on Life & Style, OK!, and the National Enquirer, while she “shares” the covers of Us Weekly and Star Magazine with Jennifer Aniston. I’ll just break down some of the highlights from the cover blurbs: Angelina is a total fake, a cheater, she’s adopting without Brad, she’s been spreading nasty rumors about Jen, she and Jen both have “spiteful agendas” and are playing mind games with each other, and Angelina gives great bitchface (that’s just what I noticed from all of the bitchface covers).

I’ll start with one of the easier stories, from OK!. Apparently, OK thinks that Angelina is going to adopt a Syrian orphan girl, even though Brad isn’t ready for another kid. This has led to fights and according to OK, a “major rift” has formed between Brad and Angelina. Star Magazine reported this identical story (substituting the cute photo of a Syrian girl with an African girl) a few months ago.

Next up, Life & Style. They are claiming that they have new revelations that Angelina is a “total fake”, and that these revelations will “raise doubts about her saintly image”. Apparently, Angelina “manipulates” everything and everyone, because… no one ever thinks to make their own decisions about things? Here’s the L&S cover story:

Some big news broke for movie junkies on Nov. 4: Johnny Depp is in talks to join Angelina Jolie in the sexy spy thriller The Tourist. It will be the first time the duo have ever worked together. But the news was even more surprising because it completely contradicted a promise Angelina had made just weeks earlier. In an interview in the October issue of the British magazine Stylist, she said she intended to take a break from acting in part to focus on being a full-time mom to her six young children with Brad Pitt. “Maybe a film a year or every other year, and then I’ll phase things out.”

Instead, she signed on for The Tourist, and she’s also in talks to play a femme fatale in the fashion-dynasty drama Gucci. Of course, Angelina’s entitled to change her mind — but this marks the third time she’s publicly proclaimed her intent to take time off to care for her children. “Angelina has mastered the ability to play the greatest role of her life — that of a doting mother and partner who’d do anything for humanity,” a Hollywood insider tells Life & Style. “But the truth is more complex.”

Despite the image Angelina’s worked so hard to create, she’s also addicted to fame. In order to portray herself as a saintly figure, she claims to be above the Hollywood fray, not even bothering to have a publicist or read magazines. (“I never read what they write about us,” she says.) But a friend insists that’s nonsense. Instead of a publicist, she has a manager, Geyer Kosinski, whose reputation for protecting clients got him the nickname “Geyer the liar.” And a friend of the couple says they are interested in what magazines say about them. “How can you choose to be on W or Vogue if you’ve never been to a newsstand to look,” the friend says.

And like many celebrities, Angie’s also obsessed with staying young. But having work done goes against her image, so she’ll never admit it. “Angelina’s been in a lot,” a source at one of the top dermatologist’s offices in the U.S. tells Life & Style. “She’s very uptight about people not knowing that she has work done and keeps everything very discreet. It’s subtle stuff — fillers and laser treatments.”

[From Life & Style]

Eh. I might be more convinced if somehow the gerbils of doom were in on it. On to everyone’s favorite bitch fight, Jennifer Aniston vs. Angelina, which takes the Star and Us Weekly covers. Us Weekly’s story (“Angelina’s Cruel Lies”) looks like it’s about Angelina being the big, mean, goth, bitchfaced bad guy, and poor little pathetic Jennifer Aniston just cries herself to sleep every night because Angelina is so cruel. True story! Us Weekly also has Jon Voight on record saying he and Angelina have reconciled, sort of: “”We’re in touch, but not regularly. We love each other and that’s the most important thing.” A “friend“ says: “Angie made the initial contact. Brad [Pitt] has been supportive – a key factor in her reaching out.”

Meanwhile, Star attempts to make the story about Jennifer and Angelina trying to destroy each other in equal measure. Spoiler: this story does not involve gerbils either. I wish.

Dirty tricks! Catty insults! 2am phone calls! It’s been almost 5 years since Brad Pitt split from Jennifer Aniston and took up with his Mr. & Mrs. Smith costar Angelina Jolie, but the two women involved in Hollywood’s most famous love triangle can’t let their bitter rivalry go.

In the Nov. 23 issue of Star — on sale today! — we report that the longtime feud is going strong with both women playing mind games with one another. Jen loves digging at Angie by flaunting her relationship with Brad’s family while Angie relishes rubbing Jen’s nose in the fact that she has six beautiful children with Brad.

“Jen and Angie despise each other and take great pleasure in seeing each other squirm,” an insider tells Star.

Among the tricks Angie plays are finding from designers what dress Jennifer wants to wear on the red carpet — then going out to grab it for herself. Jen likes to make late night calls to Brad when he’s in France — conveniently “forgetting” the time difference so she will wake her nemesis in the early hours.

But Brad is not just an innocent bystanders in this war of the wills. An insider tells Star he’s “a terrible instigator” and even “eggs it on.”

[From Star Magazine]

And yes, people are still buying this sh-t. Finally, we have the Enquirer’s story about Angelina “collapsing” because she’s too thin. Brad is “scared” and he wants Angelina to go into counseling. It’s kind of a boring story, like the Enquirer wasn’t even trying.

Meanwhile, I’m kind of curious why Angelina got so many covers this week. She hasn’t given any interviews in a while, she’s not promoting anything, and there really isn’t any new information about her, truly. One theory I have for this media saturation is that both Ian Halperin and Andrew Morton (both of whom are about to release books on Angelina soon) are starting to “leak” to the tabloids, trying to get some early buzz for their books. We’ll see.

Magazine covers thanks to Cover Awards.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

103 Responses to “Angelina Jolie dominates the tabloids with her “cruelty & spite””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Sumodo says:

    It’s been a slow gossip-news week. So, they revive St. Angie is a Fake. BFD

  2. snowball says:

    Oy, my head hurts. Kudos to you for having waded through that cesspool to give us the highlights.

    I have maybe a teaspoon of love for St. Angie, but she’s on the cover of some tabloid every week with claims that either Brad is leaving her, Jen hates her and can’t move on, she’s either ill or is battling anorexia or she’s adopting ten more kids even though Brad says what they have is enough.

    Gah!

  3. LolaBella says:

    *Pops popcorn,gets comfortable and waits for the madness to begin*

  4. Alecto says:

    blah… who cares?

  5. Firestarter says:

    Ahhh, this should be fun today!

  6. Just a Poster says:

    *scoots seat next to Lola*

    Here take some of my M & M’s they are quite tasty with buttery salted popcorn =)

  7. Pont Neuf says:

    The so-called “revelations” on the cover of Life&Style aren’t exactly something new. Angelina has been criticized a million times for those things, so this isn’t anything new.

    If anything, I think that the triangle of Jolie, Pitt and Aniston still sells because most women feel threatened by Angelina and Jennifer Aniston hasn’t found anyone to replace Brad Pitt.

    Still, that wouldn’t make this story any less atrociously BORING. Find something new to publish already or stop printing the same soporific crap time and time again.

  8. Charity is Chic says:

    I believe there’s some truth to some of this.

    First, Angie has very obviously had some work done. Those photos of when she was sixteen that surfaced a few weeks ago show a larger nose and a bulb on the tip that is no longer there. And her face is now clearly got some botox and fillers in it. Much like Brad, whose pockmarks suddenly disappeared around 2004.

    And yes, Angie did say on numerous occasions that she plans on phasing out her acting career in a couple of years. That was five years ago.

    Both Brad and Angie claim not to read the things that are written about them but Brad commented on Jen’s ‘uncool’ comments so obviously they DO read stuff.

    Angie is obviously far from the saintly person she tries to portray. She and Brad cheated and then used their charity work to protect themselves. That much is pretty clear, unless you’re a wacked out Brangeloonie.

    And I believe Brad is NOT an innocent person in all of this. He does instigate and he does try to portray himself as better than he really is. Give one example of Brad being charitable BEFORE he and Angie were caught on the beach in Africa. Just ONE example.

  9. Cheyenne says:

    *Yawn*

  10. viper says:

    lazer really? Because I would lazer my hair off too if I had the money for it. As for the injections- ridiculous.

  11. alex says:

    LMAO. Come on do sane people actually believe these bs stories. Lainey have it right when see said this:

    And it’s time to hate on Angelina Jolie again. Three tabloid covers this week appeal to the MiniVan insecurity about the world’s sexiest woman. Life & Style is calling her a fraud, OK! reports that she’s cutting Brad out of the next adoption, and Us Weekly is profiling the “Brangelina” exposé, once again resurrecting the old Triangle – the vamp vs the victim, poor Jennifer Aniston is getting meangirled. These are the stories that resonate with women. Awesome.

  12. alex says:

    Charity for Chic, of course you believe these stories. I had no doubt you will grace us with your presence and let us know you believe it. You are so predictable especially when it comes to a thread about Angelina lol

  13. Charity is Chic says:

    Alex, sweetie aren’t you just as predictable defending your saint all the time? Yes, you are. Stop acting like you’re above the fray. You’re here. And you’re commenting. One of these days you’ll just have to accept the fact that you’re just like the rest of us. Not better than the rest of us.

  14. Firestarter says:

    Aniston has not found anyone to replace Brad Pitt? Please. Like she has to be actively looking to “replace” him? Jeez, the woman is living her life as she sees fit, like Jolie, is not bothering anyone, yet people have to still paint her as this tragic figure who screams at the ocean, pining away for the days of old with Pitt. Sadly, while she is well over him, the rest of the world obviously is not over the idea that she has moved on.

    Newsflash- Some women, myself included, choose to be single at certain periods in their life. One does not have to be crying over another lost love or have a personality defect in order to be single.

    I just don’t get it that people assume that to be a happy woman in this life that you have to have a husband and a house full of children. To me, personally, that is misery, to someone else it is heaven. The point is, Jennifer seems to be happy in her life, inspite of what her detractors want to think.

    Happiness does not come with a penis or in diapers. Happiness is within yourself. Period.

  15. angie fan. says:

    I pray for Angie to continue to be strong and for Brad to continue to support her. Her fans no that she is not fake but Aniston, not so sure.

  16. Essie says:

    I’m wondering also why Angelina is on all those covers all of a sudden. Then I remembered the two books coming out. Oh well!! Most of these stories are just rehashed lies from months/years ago. These ragmags just seem to recycle the same ole, same ole. It’s boring!!

    I don’t think I will ever understand why these rags continue to make Jennifer Aniston sound like a stupid, silly girl, pining away for her lost love. I seriously think all three people in this triangle moved on long ago. Only the tabloids haven’t and that’s because they know who their readers are!!! A Jen/Angie/Brad cover sales everytime and these tabloids are desperate for newsstand sales, especially since the Gosselins have faded.

  17. LolaBella says:

    *Lounging on the sofa with Just a Poster enjoying our M&Ms and popcorn*

    This is getting good!

  18. alex says:

    Oh Charity for Chic, you are funny…NOT. I am not defending anybody cause there is nothing to defend and I am sure that Angie can defend herself just fine and need no help doing so. And yep I am above the fray because I don’t sit on my butt believing everything the tabs say like it is the gospel truth or judging people I don’t know. There are some people that I don’t like but you won’t find me posting on their thread.

    People like you live for the tabs and their bs stories, kind of sad isn’t it.

    Anyhoo enough time on here for me, unlike you I have a real life and I am sure I will see you on another Angie or brad’s thread after all you can’t help yourself lol

    bye bye carry on the hate

  19. angelinafan1 says:

    Charity is Chic
    Of course you believe this is true. You rag on them every time there is an Angelina post.

    It’s so funny the plastic surgery rumor, because when I looked at her photos at 16, I thought it proved she didn’t have surgery. I was doubtful but that proved it. You can scream she had surgery from the hill tops but if you don’t have proof, your case is empty. Her face has changed and it can be blamed on weight gain, makeup, lighting, aging, pregnancy, photoshop,…a host of reasons. It’s not obvious to me, and unless a plastic surgeon or she herself steps forward, I ain’t buying it. The tabloids always say the stars have plastic surgery because they don’t want to believe that anyone can naturally be that beautiful.
    Just like they don’t want Brad and Angelina to be together so they say they are splitting up.
    Remember the scarlet johannson p.s. snafu? People say Kate Winslet had surgery. All this is catty bullshit.

    Brad commented on the uncool comments because the interviewer brought that up in the interview. Angelina never tried to portray herself as a saint, the media and her crazy fans did. She does what a human being in her position should do, and that is: give back.

  20. Tia C says:

    I’m with Cheyenne. And yes, Kaiser, this onslaught of Angie tab covers probably has to do with the upcoming book releases.

  21. Cheyenne says:

    I love the part about Brad being an instigator, “egging them on” and throwing fuel on the flames.

    I’m actually starting to feel sorry for Aniston. I don’t know if her fans realize it, but she comes off in these tabloid stories looking worse than Jolie. Crying herself to sleep every night after five years? GMAFB. Do they have any idea what a pathetic loser this makes her look like? Everybody in this melodrama moved on a long time ago.

  22. Charity is Chic says:

    Agreed Firestarter. Unfortunately some people still live in the 1950s and think a woman is only happy if she’s got a man and a zillion kids at home. How sad for them.

    And for some, I think the dream of six kids is a lot better than the reality. If Brad were all that happy he wouldn’t look the way he does. And don’t tell me it’s for a movie. He’s looked this way for months and does not appear to be on a film set, just drunk and high all the time.

  23. a says:

    hey we all get old, but does anybody else thing Angie and Brad are looking over the hill of late?

  24. filthycute says:

    LOL @ LolaBella 🙂

  25. snowball says:

    I agree, Cheyenne.

    I wonder sometimes if Aniston started seeing that douchebag Mayer so the tabs would have something to snark on her about that has nothing to do with Brad and Angelina.

  26. Charity is Chic says:

    Yes, Angelinafan Brad commented on what an interviewer asked him. And he seemed to know all about. Describing in detail about how she was railroaded into answering the question.

    Much like Aniston responds when an interviewer asks her questions. Except when she answers questions the nutcases jump all over her and call ehr a pathetic loser who won’t let go. I guess Brad gets to respond, but Aniston doesn’t.

    Nice double standard.

  27. Oh My says:

    I think the funniest thing I read about Saint Angie recently was that she’s getting back together with BillyBob. . .it was a week or so ago and I was laughing so hard I forgot where I read it.

    I do wonder if some of this is actually fueled by her allegedly non-existent publicity team to maintain her status and flood the market with weirdness so any real stuff is ignored. Case in point, today on MSNBC’s The Scoop is asking “Is Hollywood turning on Angelina Jolie?” and their examples of hollywood turning on her are Rosie O’Donnell and Megan Fox describing her scary and Kristen Stewart saying she wants to be an actress not a celebrity like Jolie.

  28. Mimi says:

    Oh boy people are REALLY that STUPID that actually believe in all that S.H.I.T.Y and WORSE BUY this mags!!! I’m really getting tired of all this fake histories is not even funny just repetitive and people are still blind about the mags manipulative ways.
    Can this mags live BRAD/JOLIE/JEN the f.u.c.k ALONE Jen was not suffering when after the divorce she’s hookup whit Vince and others along the years shes happy single good for her.
    Brad and Angie are happy being parents good for then. can this mags PLEASE go after ROBSTEN/TAYTAY or whatever is the new teen sensation how about the Miss Hypocrite California or better how about going after the Chris WOMAN BITTER and BEATER Brown this would be interesting.
    Just leave this 3 people alone and Alex ur right but COMMON SENSE for some people DON’T EXIST for what i see in some of the posts here.

  29. Bubulle says:

    Wow so all the tabloids are claiming that AJ is a fake lying bitch. Is it Jennifer Aniston’s birthday today ?

  30. teri says:

    I don’t support those trashy tabloids, they are getting desperate to stay in business. I know their are gulible people out there who believe this but not many. Angelina is a great woman and Brad loves her. Ian was also sure that Jen was a lesbian because someone told him that’s what Brad said.

  31. moo says:

    Must be a slow week for the Rag Mag’s…. I think I’ll save my money because we’ve all heard this shit before. I personally cannot WAIT for a split, but really don’t give a shit about that either. It’s all become so very, very BORING….

  32. lucy2 says:

    Good grief. I agree that the 3 people actually involved in this all moved on LONG ago, it’s the tabloids keeping it going because it sells.
    Sure, there are hints of truth in some of the nonsense (mostly regarding her saying she’s quitting acting and never doing it, and being controlling about her image) but it’s stuff that’s been said a million times before. Most of it is probably made up garbage just to try to keep things riled up so that people keep buying the magazines and following the story online for ad revenue too. Plus, I agree that some of it has to do with the books as well – leak a little story, get some interest going again, and then try to sell books.

  33. teri says:

    If Angelina is fake then I want to be just like her. I seriously don’t see anything fake about her. Her money isn’t fake she’s giving to others, her time isn’t fake she’s giving, her body wasn’t fake giving birth three times and her past certainly isn’t fake either. She’s been straight forward with everything, what exactly do you consider fake? I know she’s so perfect with Brad it must be fake right?

  34. Firestarter says:

    Bubulle: and when the same is done to Aniston, will it then be Jolie’s birthday or Maddox’s?

  35. karen says:

    Charity, you are the person who accused Brad of supporting the Burmese military regime/war/death by doing a commercial for Suzuki. And, you called all the fans “stupid.” Then, Kaiser corrected you, saying Brad never did a commercial for Suzuki. I think your bias against them is obvious. So, you believe what you want to believe. I think it’s all made up lies. All 3 should sue, imo.

  36. teri says:

    It would be so heart tugging to decide to quit acting on Angelinas half. If she does quit acting how does this woman still keep giving to the less fortunate. Money does run out and God knows there’s plenty needed around the world. She donated a huge sum to build the Angelinas boarder school for girls in Kenya, we are talking about 8 million dollars. Just think of the running and upkeep through out the years. If she actually stayed home some of these negative posters would complain about something else, right?

  37. Nebraska says:

    I think it is about time for AJ and JA to star in a spy thriller movie with some romantic comedy thrown in. Jen could play the Salt kind of character that Ang usually does, and Ang could play the Rachel character; Sam Mendez could direct!

  38. Firestarter says:

    She sponsors a boarding school in Kenya, it is not hers.

  39. jdao says:

    I’m pretty bored with this story. It’s the same stuff.

  40. boo says:

    Right on Firestarter. All that stuff about JA pining away for BP is getting sooooo old and just shows that some tabloids really lack imagination.

  41. crash2GO2 says:

    My goodness. Who’s cheerios did she piss in this time?

  42. Bek says:

    Ok Teri, I have to say it! If Brad supposedly left Jen because she’s a closeted lesbian, why is it that he would go running to one of the most well-known (and, sorry, well-experienced) bisexuals out there? That makes sense…

  43. Nonya says:

    I think Brad and Angelina or a waste of space. I can’t even watch their movies anymore. You can tell, with everything that has happened in this last 5 years that Angelina is a manipulative %$^&#. We all new this back then, nothing’s changed. I don’t believe Jen is sitting crying herself to sleep. Blah. She’s moved on. But Angie will always be a home wrecking whore who covers up her slutty ways with baby’s and trips to war torn countries *boring*. Wow, that sounded bitter, but I’m so over seeing these guys everywhere. Enough, can’t we get a permanent ban on these guys.

  44. Bek says:

    I really don’t get some of the comments on here. Who knows how much of the hoopla is really true about Jolie, but I find it really interesting that whenever there’s something negative about her in the press, people come out screaming about Jennifer Aniston’s horrible tanning, or movie sales! Or “she’s just sooo ugly and boring!” Let’s face it girls. I’ve got nothing against Jolie, but you’ve got to admit at some point that the reason people make up excuses to hate Jennifer is because she had the gall to be married to Angie’s current boyfriend. The nerve! If she wasn’t beautiful, if she wasn’t threatening, if she wasn’t successful in her own right, then nobody would need to yell from the rooftops how pathetic she is. Come on.

  45. Beth says:

    I can’t believe that people fall for this every single time. You would think that after five years people wouldn’t be so quick to believe the tabloids. They make up stories and take things out of context all of the time. The Stylist interview was cut and paste from the Changeling promotion. Angelina said that she was taking a year off after filming Changeling and Salt which she did/doing. And in a few years she would work less, a film a year until eventually fading out. She never said she’s giving up her career to be a full-time mother. The Tourist doesn’t have a full cast and director. It won’t be filming for at least several months. Although I’m sure if she’s on set at nine months people will say liar. The Gucci movie is still all talk. It isn’t even a fact that she’s considering it. Not to mention that there’s not script or cast. The Jennifer rivally drama is stupid. People should be embarrassed for believing it. Just because people don’t read tabloids doesn’t mean they can’t hear about rumors. They do have to go to stores that have magazines and papers with them on the covers, watch tv with commercials for ET or Extra talking about the rumors. Plus hearing it from friends and family.

  46. karen says:

    “Cruel Lies”–how ironic. That describes tabloids to a T. They are such trash, and the way they target these 3 is bordering on cruelty. I wonder why none of them are suing? Is it not worth the effort? Or, is any publicity good publicity when you are surrounded by much younger, desperate actors clawing for any kind of media attention, even the bad kind? Hmmm

  47. Charity is Chic says:

    Brangeloonies are always right. I’m sure it’s all a giant Aniston conspiracy. LOL.

    Going back to my original post it’s weird how I have yet to see one person post an example of charity work that Brad did BEFORE he got caught on the beach in Africa.

    Wonder why that is.

  48. Firestarter says:

    @Teri- WTF are you talking about, “Her body isn’t fake, giving birth 3 times”? I have not read once where anyone accused her of being a man or transgender. So what the heck are you talking about?

    I also love how you say Brad told someone that Jen is a lesbian! I mean now she is a closeted lesbian? And then you talk about how wrong it is to accuse Jolie of untrue attributes? Aren’t you in fact perpetuating rumors by even mentioning anything that is said on IanUndercover? I went to that site once after asking on here about who Ian was. I cannot believe anyone goes to that looney bin for any sort of info. The guy is a liar and everything he says is boaderline psycho stuff. So according to you, he is right when saying Aniston is gay but incorrect when he spews his venom about Jolie.

    This is what frustrates me on these threads- If the Star, IT and all the rags lie about Jolie, they are in fact lies, but when they talk about Aniston they all of a sudden gain credibility. I said it before, nothing in any of those rags is remotely true, other than the names of the people. That is where the truth ends. I do not believe a word that is said about anyone. The Enquirer may get something right out of every 100 tryies, but the rest are never right about anyone, let alone Pitt/Jolie and Aniston.

    People is probably the most accurate and even they are not immune to stretching the truth. Lets remember a very obvious concept” Misery sells papers and magazines. Happy news does not. Watch the evening news and what do you see? Nothing but the most negative stories out there, never a happy profile piece, but tons of city murder stats, bad politcal news and death destruction, everywhere. As much as we say we want to have happy stories, the majority of the world thrives and flocks to tragedy. People will stop and gawk at a grisley accident, but will not stop to help a dog from being hit on the road.

    Sad but true. Negativity sells andthat is the name of the game.

  49. teri says:

    Bek, …I didn’t make it up. A source known as NOBODY told Ian it was the truth. I simply don’t believe it, alot of what Ian spouts off isn’t accurate and far from it. You cannot take what this fool says as truth.

  50. irl500girl says:

    Ya’ know Star’s story is BS since it says Angie Jo steals JA’s dresses.
    Hardly!
    Angie Jo always wears the old lady bland potato sacks and JA always wears cute stylish dresses.

    The Enquirer is more believable since Angie Jo is looking alot like Skelator.
    She’s not looking fit or well – she’s looking sickly skinny.

  51. Bek says:

    “Did you know that Jen smokes?!?! She SMOKES!!!!”
    “her relationships are all fake. I know it. She’s never under fire for it, but I just know.”
    “she still misses Brad. Yep. Don’t ask me how I know it…oh wait. I read it in a tabloid, from which I pick and choose what to believe…”
    “brad hated her. he couldn’t wait to leave. that’s why he still says positive things about her to the press.”
    I mean, really people? It’s just as stupid as saying that you know for sure that Jolie is mean/manipulative. How can any of it be proved? At least it’s all very entertaining. I love how a dozen of you are claiming to be “bored” when really, you’re probably worried about defending your “side”. LOL. I, for one, am having a jolly time. Shout-out to lolabella! The media hailstorm and resulting fights are better than any movie done by any of the 3.

  52. Oh My says:

    ooooooooooooh I finally got the whole thing figured out. Pitt’s actually a beard, a dirty ugly beaded one but a beard nonetheless, for AngieJo & JennyA to be together (while e watches, natch). . . They are all probably laughing their arses off at all of this

  53. Zarah says:

    Amazing. The tabloids are OBSESSED with Angelina. And of course she HAS to be the big, bad! Such utter tripe. So ridiculous that this garbage is being churned out week in and week out and pathetic, miserable women are still buying it.

  54. why not?! says:

    I kinda believe it… It suits her PERFECTLY!

  55. Rosalee says:

    Wow, I walk away for a few hours and missed all the fireworks..darn, I love reading the comments that fire up the site whenever there is an Jolie/Pitt/Aniston posting. It’s like tossing a lit match onto a gas soaked mattress..a little seedy but nevertheless entertaining.

  56. pickelhaube says:

    NOOOO, not an atricle that will rile the Brangeloonies! WHY? Why do we keep doing this, we know how this always ends!

    BTW, I hate Angelina and her phony St. Angie BS, she is not fooling me, and I feel bad for the fools who fall for her fake-assed PR stunts. I just don’t see her appeal, nor do I understand how regular people who don’t even know her, have never met her, will defend her like she’s some saint. SHE DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOU AND SHE NEVER WILL. Defending her on the internet is like, the height of pathetic. Seriously…think about it.

  57. kim says:

    The Stylist magazine that the other tabs have been quoting is a cut and paste job . They took interviews she did pre twins in 2008 and compiled the answers. I recognize the quotes from July Vanity Fair and Entertainment Weekly.She doesn’t do interview unless she’s promoting also in the interview it’s not a Q and A format. British Cosmo did the same thing last year they printed quotes from 2004 as if they were new. I hope she continues her policy of not responding to these tabs. As for Jen these tabs paint her an a bad light also i.e. drunk dialing and sneaking around with Brad. Jen has moved on but the tabs never will. Now that Jon has found God and doing Yoga no more Gossilins on the tabs.Btw in Syria local law does not allow adoption of children by foreigners but the idiots at OK magazine didn’t check on that before reprinted a story from a British tab.

  58. Lem says:

    @ the sidelines: scootch over on the couch and let me know where the shot count is. I’m not up for reading the comments, but I’ll pass the bottle.

  59. Cheyenne says:

    Okay folks, can we all agree on the following:

    1. Aniston is not pining for Brad

    2. Aniston is not crying herself to sleep every night because bad ole Angie stole her man

    3. Angelina never talks about Aniston in any way, shape or form because simply doesn’t care about her one way or another

    4. Ditto for Brad

    5. Aniston is not texting Brad

    6. Brad is not texting Aniston

    7. The two are not meeting in secret

    8. Aniston is not calling her former in-laws

    9. Brad is not instigating trouble between Jolie and Aniston

    10. The tabloids are full of bullshit

    I think that about covers it.

  60. Goddess711 says:

    AJ’s a crazy beyatch – what’s new or unusual about that? We all know it. I’m waiting for her to have her mental breakdown. It’s coming.

  61. lolo says:

    Wow, people are obsessed with Angelina. Celebs, tabloids, drop her name and it instantly starts a firestorm. Lame.

  62. Firestarter says:

    Cheyenne- Excellent list! I think that does about cover it!

  63. Fire says:

    Wow, you guys. It’s so crazy how fired up everyone gets about stupid, made up shit that is printed to try to help keep the tabs/mags alive. I’m so over this whole triangle thing. I think you are spot on Cheyenne, especially point #10.

    Oh, and pass the M&Ms, Lola and Just a Poster. I need a chocolate fix after reading all of this.

    The poor little Madonna story from yesterday only got 9 comments and cutie Taylor Lautner only gets 8? Mention AJ or JA and the shit starts flyin! We’re up to 63!

  64. Laura says:

    @Cheyenne

    I’m with Firestarter! I’m glad you were fair.

    They have all moved on. Everyone else hasn’t

    And to Firestarter? You statement regarding why when IT, OK, Star, etc make up rumours about JA, it’s treated as fact while the opposite is true for the JPs? Well, we’re still waiting for the stans….er…fans of the JPs to explain…no response yet….

  65. Cheyenne says:

    Essie: I don’t think I will ever understand why these rags continue to make Jennifer Aniston sound like a stupid, silly girl, pining away for her lost love.
    *************************************************

    Because that, luv, is what sells the tabloids. Where do you think the tabloids will be the minute they stop publishing bullshit about the J-P-A triangle? Six feet under, is where.

    Now for whoever said Jolie broke her word that she was going to stop making movies (I’m too lazy to look upthread to check who said it): slow your roll. First off, she never said she was going to stop making movies. She said she was going to be making fewer movies, and so far that’s what she’s done. Salt wrapped sometime last spring. If she has signed on for The Tourist, that film is nowhere near getting started yet. It probably won’t start filming until sometime next spring so she will have taken a whole year off by then. And as for the movie she’s supposed to be making with Johnny Depp, that is pure Hollywood rumor and probably nothing to it. According to imdb.com the only movie she’s definitely doing beside The Tourist is Kung Fu Panda 2, which is another two years from now, and all she’ll be doing in that film is voice-over. It doesn’t sound like she’s neglecting her family for her career.

  66. TwinkleToes says:

    It would be great if it were the old days with actual stars. Stars that were beautiful like Liz Taylor, Grace Kelly and Audrey Hepburn. Not these people who still aren’t classic beauties even WITH all of their plastic surgery. Jolie is the big faced dirtbag from high school who is only popular because the hot football stud like Pitt chose her. Same, if not more for Aniston.

  67. lisa says:

    All these stories sound like they were taken from High school. I mean really. I don’t care if you like them or not. If anyone cares too.. look through the archives and you will see the EXACT same stories a year ago, two, three, four and five.. same old same old stuff. . and in Five years HOW many of these stories have been shown to be true.. I would love to know.. I mean their have been at least 1000 covers or sidebars.. How many have been shown to be true.. STAR mag had Angie 3 months pregnant while they were at Cannes.. How many Brad leaves or Angie leaves or Angie/Brad break up stories have there been.. Not to mention Brad/Jen together..yet we have NEVER seen them together since 2004. So I am going with lies, lies, lies. until I have proof of different.. and in 5 years.. I am still waiting for the proof.

  68. lisa says:

    OH.. Cheyenne

    Just want to say.. thank you for your post. If I had read all the comments before hand I could have saved myself a few sentences..

    I also applaud the posters for being fair. I realize some don’t like Angie/Brad or even Jen.. and I will be honest I have my fangirl celebs.. but I will say that I totally agree with your list.. and while I am not a fan of Jennifer.. I too think she had moved on and so have Brad/Angie. the only ones talking are the tabs and a few misguided fans..

    Finally a nice adult conversation and respect for different opinions. Maybe we are all growing up..

  69. Mimi says:

    @Cheyenne i agree with ur post at 5:26 and and will be known henceforth as the
    10 COMMANDMENTS hahaha again great comment

  70. TwinkleToes says:

    Cheyenne, I’m curious about what you look like. See if my theory is correct.

  71. TwinkleToes says:

    Pickel, let’s see who “they” are.

  72. Elle says:

    @Cheyenne. Can I also add that Jolie is not the devil as the tabloids make her out to be? And, that we don’t really know these people? And, that they are all really well off (compared to me, anyways), so we don’t need to feel sorry for them (except for the tabloid stuff)? Or, be hateful towards them, either? That’s just my opinion.
    I don’t get all the meangirl stuff.

  73. Essie says:

    Cheyenne, thanks!! I know the “triangle” sells magazines and most of these ragmags are going under fast (especially OK). I just think it’s sad that Jennifer is made to look so foolish. I’m not a fan, I love Angelina, but it’s pitiful how Jennifer looks so much worse than Angelina in these made up stories. The woman is probably perfectly happy and content with her life and doesn’t think about Brad or Angelina at all!!

    Anyway, I’ve had enough of this. I don’t believe any of these lies but they are fun to argue about!!

  74. Bete says:

    How is it possible for actors who collect children like stamps, to actually spend time with their adopted children when that is done by staff?
    That alone is indication enough of pseudo parenting and much of it is publicity related.

  75. irishserra says:

    I love how we praise her and build her up just to tear her down. Addicted to fame? Of course, thanks to each and every one of you.

    Kudos.

  76. birdie says:

    You know why the tabloids are still writing this shit? Because look how many comments this story has already gotten on CB… It’s guaranteed to be one of the week’s top stories even though there is absolutely nothing new to report. People love this shit!

    P.S. – The photo of Jen that US weekly used is quite mean! Her eyes look freakishly close together!

  77. Cheyenne says:

    moo: I personally cannot WAIT for a split, but really don’t give a shit about that either. It’s all become so very, very BORING….
    ***********************************************

    What, you got bored waiting for them to split? Can’t blame you for that. After waiting five years, I’d get bored, too.

    Well, cheer up. According to Ian Halperin, your wait may be over next year. He’s predicted that Brad and Angie will break up around Christmas 2010. So keep the champagne on ice.

    Of course, with Ian, you never know. He also predicted on his blog last year that they would break up this past June at Cannes when the Sudanese model Brad was supposed to have impregnated showed up at the festivities to confront him with the baby. You just can’t trust those Sudanese, can you? The ungrateful beeyotch never showed up, and the Jolie-Pitts trashed Ian’s timeline, so now he’s moved it back eighteen months. Tune in next December for the next exciting episode.

  78. thepickle says:

    These tabloids, all desperate BS. What will really happen is that Angie will have 10 more of Brad’s kids..then she will divorce him due to artistic differences, plus the whole Mr. and Mrs. Smith fantasy/big budget hollywood mirage will have worn off with the baby making pheromones after the last kid. He’ll wish he could go back to no kids/adults only/i loved you for you/you didn’t need to knock me up Jennifer, but she will have moved on, so then he’ll have some old man epiphany a la Mel Gibson, and take up with a 20 something year old newbie actress from Iceland with tiny lips who will feel grateful to him for the exposure. He’ll buy an expensive new car/nation, use lots of his money to pretend he is a real architect, build shopping malls in Iceland, declare he is truly fulfilled, run for president, and win, with his newbie girlfriend at his side. No one would have voted for Angie since she has those suspiciously large French lips. Meanwhile Angie will have taken up with a Cambodian capitalist, and opened a chain of orphanages. Adoption will be like McDonalds. You will be able to put it on your credit card. It will all work out since President Brad will declare Cambodia our #1 trading partner and appoint Maddox as diplomat. Angie will go for lip reduction so as to look more like our first lady, and wonder why she didn’t really do anything important with her life like make peace with her Father.

  79. linda says:

    I love the word soporific, cudos to pont neuf for using it!!!

  80. linda says:

    as for this crap, who cares??!!!

  81. Ursula says:

    There are two books coming out about Angie’s life and none of them good. Brangelina has now moved into that phase, where everything they do will be wrong. Tabloids like them when they would use them, but face it, positive stories about Brangelina don’t sell. Good luck for them, 2010 does not promise to be a good year for them.

    It will be hard for her to adopt from Syria. It is a muslim country and Brange are not religious. Also the adoption laws are not as crappy as those of the countries that Brange adopt from.

  82. Bambi says:

    Well, I guess the 80 + comments answer the question of why this woman is all over the tabloids.

    I don’t care one way or the other about Angelina, Brad or Jen. I do wish there were other people to see on magazine covers– activists, philanthropists, scientists– hell, even some different actors would be a welcome change!

    Is the demand really driving the supply in this case or are we just resigned to having these celebrities jammed down our throats?

  83. DiMi says:

    Oh. and BOTH of these women have had nose jobs. Look at Friends. Look at Jen now. Look at Gia and look at Angelina now. Angelina had better work than Jennifer, but they both did it. All three are insanely botoxed. These are actors, people. Why defend any of them? Why?

  84. Firestarter says:

    I have to say, who cares if either of these women has had nose jobs, face peels, head transplants, why does it matter? If you have the money and the best plastic surgeons at your disposal, why not improve upon what you have.

    The things I hate that women do to themselves are Botox and Lip fillers. They never look good and basically most actresses who have gone that route look terrible and would be better off with wrinkles. There is something unsettling about looking at a face that is smooth and shiney!

  85. Cheyenne says:

    @ Ursula: What is “crappy” about the adoption laws in Vietnam, Cambodia and Ethiopia? Do you have specifics or are you just spouting off?

    It is almost impossible for any non-Muslim to adopt a child from any Arab country. Syria does allow non-Muslims to adopt children placed in orphanages run by the Syrian Catholic Church, but in those cases, the adoptive couple must be Catholic. I don’t know if that disqualifies Angelina but it definitely rules out Brad. And in Jordan the adoptive applicants must not only be Muslim, they must also provide medical verification that they are infertile. That rules out both of them.

  86. Cheyenne says:

    TwinkleToes: Cheyenne, I’m curious about what you look like. See if my theory is correct.
    ********************************************

    What theory is that?

  87. ligeia says:

    i was wondering why on earth do tabloids still cover this junk, reading the comments above made it rather clear lol…

  88. kim says:

    So adopting 3 kids is collecting kids like stamps. So are Marie Osmond 5 adopted kids Sharon Stone(3) Lauren Holly(3), Mia Farrow(11) Rosie Oddonnel(4) kid collectors too. As an adoptive parent of 2 kids I find that description of adoption offensive. I hope Angie keeps doing what she has bein doing her 1. UN work to raise awareness to the plight of refugees.2 Being the highest paid and most powerful actress in Hollywood. 3 Taking care of her family and ignoring the negativity including the tabloids. Peace!

  89. Cheyenne says:

    kim: you know how the game is played by now. If Angelina does it, it’s bad. If anybody else does the same thing, it’s all good. Don’t sweat it.

  90. Bek says:

    @Cheyenne and Kim: It’s not like there weren’t hundreds of famous people adopting before Angelina. And there will be many after her. Same with leaving your spouse for another. It’s just that Brangie has sort of become the poster child of all these situations. I think there are things they could have done better that would have prevented that outcome. Less interviews/projects, more downtime. Hey, it’s worked for many big names before them. People argue a lot that they don’t have a choice how much they’re followed and harassed. But as we’ve all seen the last six months, they didn’t want to be photographed, and weren’t as often. On the upside, I think all the negativity has helped their careers (all three), so perhaps they do want to keep it going for that reason. After all, I’m sorry, but all three of them mention each other in interviews. Not always by name, but they drop details and dish on each other.

  91. Cheyenne says:

    Bek, if you have any examples of Angie mentioning Aniston in any interview, beside the one in Vogue in 2007 where she was specifically asked if she would ever consider a sit-down with Aniston and she responded “That would be her decision and I would welcome it”, please post it here. Other than that interview, she has never, to my knowledge, referred to Aniston either directly or indirectly.

  92. anon1000 says:

    I truly believe that the regular haters here can’t make a case for angie being weird, gothic, brother-kissing, blood vile wearing, bisexual an HATING her for her youthful mistakes. Many of these same haters did the SAME THING in their youth or witness their OWN CHILDREN’S experiences!!!(hell even FERGIE just gave an interview that she has been an avid lesbian in her past)
    The haters don’t have a leg to stand on other then being proven as HATERS of Angelina Jolie only. H.Y.P.O.C.R.I.T.E.S.

  93. Ursula says:

    Angelina used a child trafficking firm to adopt Maddox, in 2001, high on heroin and very mentally unstable, no agency would allow her to adopt a child. In Vietnam, she used her celebrity and we all know that anyone can pop into Ethiopia and walk away with a child.

    The reason why whatever Brangelina do gets a negative spin is because of the way they do it. As if it is all a grand show. One has to question their intention, is it for fame or is it genuine. Lets not forget that the way they got together was not the most ideal. The world hates a cheater, that will never change, even though Brange thought they had gotten away with it and were the next golden couple. Be it LeAnn and Cibriani or Sienna and Getty.

    Besides, Brangelina are compulsive liars, they say one thing and do another, they shout about the environment while flying around in private jets and taking hobby flights. They promise to take time off but work more than stars who have no children. They are just in your face with all stories about their rainbow family and cringe worthy interviews about their children from Africa, Asia an France. No one likes anyone who is in their face every day telling them about their perfect lives. No one likes anyone who shuts down a whole country to have their child. No one loves any one who pimps out their kids to tabloids for positive press.

    I hope that explains why there is a lot of Brange fatigue.

  94. lolo says:

    @ Ursula. Wtf? You don’t know Jolie to make all those accusations. A lot of people used the same adoption agency, and they didn’t bust that agency until much later. Seems like you buy every tabloid lie. Obsessed? I’m not even a fan but the level of seething nastiness in your comments is really beyond me.

  95. alex says:

    Oh don’t make attention to Ursula, the chick knows nothing about the JPs. She is just ranting a bunch of nonesense as always. I guess the medication she is on is not working.

  96. Cheyenne says:

    Um, Ursula… unless you have some real evidence to back up these sensational allegations you are making, I would strongly suggest that you STFU. And if you don’t want Jolie in your face every day, stop buying all those tabloids. Nobody is forcing you to read them.

    Your constant lies and slander about this woman are off the wall. You act like you’re trying to give Ian Halperin a run for his money.

  97. Bek says:

    Cheyenne: you really don’t think that Jen, Brad AND Angie aren’t prompted to speak about each other and their “ironic” situation? Yet they do. They don’t HAVE to, but they still do. Here’s a slew of random examples:

    Angie: “not all kids get to see a movie where their parents fell in love.”–Referencing an affair that supposedly didn’t happen for 4+ years.

    Jen: “all that stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work everyday? That was really uncool.”–snarky retaliation to above comments which happened several weeks prior to interview, as well as Vogue 2007.

    Brad: “Look man. Jen’s a sweetheart. She probably got dragged into saying that one.”–Brad back-tracking after both women have commented, insisting that there was nothing going on on the set of MAMS.

    Sorry, but you can’t give Jolie (or any of them) a pass on this one. They’ve all been rude to each other in the press. Jolie’s interview in Vogue 2007 wasn’t exactly nice, no matter how you spin it. It clearly rubbed the situation in Jen’s face. And Jen? Her ballsy comments last December were a long time coming, and she talks about her great marriage to Brad as well, which I’m sure burns Angie up. And Brad has said negative things about BOTH of them when he’s pissed, ie, the public comments in 2007 about how Angie sometimes “pisses him off”. They play it out. Anybody can see that they’re all either insecure, or loving the attention.

  98. Bek says:

    P.S.–just because they don’t always use each other’s names doesn’t mean they aren’t publicly bashing each other. On the part of both women, rubbing in the affair or talking about how you will always love your ex is really…not that sensitive or nice. Both Angie lovers and Jen lovers constantly try to spin it: “Jen has every right to say that. She was married to him”, or “Angie’s not being mean. She’s saying how she feels about Brad”. But, in reality, there’s probably a classier way to handle it. Both women seem catty and insecure to me. They wouldn’t act that way if they weren’t. And just to throw this out there, Angelina has had plenty of opportunities to “meet Jen”, and she’s backed out of them. Brad just goes back and forth, sometimes defending the women, sometimes narking them out. If I were Angie, I wouldn’t want to hear an interview of my current boyfriend calling his ex “a sweetheart”, or him talking about how my drinking pisses him off. And I’ll bet Jen didn’t love all the comments about how Brad felt their relationship came to a “dead end”. Sorry, but I feel bad for all three. They’ve acted like children.

  99. Cheyenne says:

    Bek, don’t you think it’s a bit paranoid to reference every remark Jolie makes to Aniston? I’ve heard people saying Jolie got pregnant with the twins to spite Aniston. How far do you want to take it and where does it stop? I would bet a dollar to a donut hole that Jolie doesn’t spare Aniston a thought in a thousand. Aniston simply doesn’t exist for her. As far as Pitt is concerned, he probably just wishes Aniston would disappear permanently. How much Aniston is still obsessed with Pitt and Jolie is open to question.

  100. Bek says:

    Cheyenne, clearly you’re not understanding me. I’m simply saying that I think all three have been rude to each other in the press. And sorry, but there have been others before them who were caught in similar “triangles” that kept quiet. I’m not a raving lunatic that tries to suggest that if Jolie cuts her hair, she must be doing it to hurt Aniston. It’s not hard to see what they HAVE done to each other. And excuse me for asking, but are you one of the raving defenders for Jolie? The ones that have a hard time defending her without quoting Jen’s movie sale numbers, or her tan or her supposed “fake” relationships? It’s quite frustrating to have a sensible conversation when one person is so one-sided about it all. From now on, I’ll just let you do what you do best. I really didn’t mean to get you all riled-up, but I’m definitely new to this site and I don’t always realize if I’m talking to a crazed fan or a rational person. My bad.

  101. Cheyenne says:

    Bek, I am just wondering where you saw Jolie being rude to Aniston in the press — or, for that matter, Pitt. I remember Aniston’s comment that what Angelina did was very uncool, but I don’t remember either Pitt or Jolie mentioning Aniston’s name. As for Jolie commenting that she and Pitt fell in love on the set of MAMS, I doubt very much that she had Aniston in mind when she said that. I think you and some other people may be falling for the tabloids’ claims that Jolie is insecure, she is jealous of Aniston, she is fearful that Brad may run back to her, etc. etc. I think Jolie is smart enough to realize that if Pitt was going to run back to his ex he would have done it along time ago. She may have a lot of insecurities, but I don’t think Aniston is one of them.

  102. Jackie says:

    Cheyenne, youe one sidedness mind boggles, am tempted to think you are on the Brangelina pay roll. But you don’t help their cause thinking Jen is evil and Brad and Angelina are saints. Angelina said she wanted to sit down and talk to Jen, she sneaked off with Brad to go to Africa and those pictures were not random, and that comment about how she could not wait to go to work, and lets not forget her famous ‘it is the movie where I fell in love’. Honestly, WHEN Brangelina split, I will have a glass of champagne. And so will many people.

    Bek,

    No need to apologise we are all entitled to our opnions.

  103. Miami Girl says:

    Yes, the Jolie/Pitts have not had a romantic relationship in a very long time. Brad never did fall out of love with Jen, and Jolie knows this. If you notice, Jolie claims she is not concerned about Jen. She says “he will never leave his children”. How about saying “he loves ME and will never leave ME”. She is well aware that Brad is with her for the kids & only for those kids. They actually can’t stand the sight of one another. They put on a great show for the cameras, but “hey” they are actors aren’t they? That is walk in the park for them. I truly believe that Brad is still, and always will be in love with Jen, but he has to be the responsible parent seeing as Jolie is not stable enough, and will not give her full attention to the kids she has. Maybe Jen never did get over Brad either. Can you blame the girl the way it all played out? It is Brad & Jen that lost the loves of their lives & it was Jolie that instigated the break up of that true love. She can have 20 kids with him, but he will never love her like he does Jen!

    “Oh yeah”, Jolie does have a movie and books being released soon. That is why she is telling everyone to put her on the covers. Good or bad she knows she needs the coverage. She cannot stand on her own merit anymore. No one likes her, no one cares about her movies, and no one cares about her wellbeing!