As of today, Friday, I’m up to 2015 in Prince Harry’s Spare. He’s already introduced a lot of nicknames for various British media figures and paparazzi, and from what I can tell, he loathed Piers Morgan and every single person in the Murdoch empire (especially Rebekah Brooks) for decades before he even met Meghan. I do wonder why Harry uses nicknames for so many media figures AND several of the senior staffers in the Windsor industrial complex. Is he trying to avoid being sued, or does he not want to give certain people the satisfaction of being named? I don’t know. But in case you were wondering about the Bee, Wasp and Fly, here’s an explainer:
Bee, Wasp and Fly, in Harry’s telling, are central to the operation — and to his jaundiced view of palace culture. They are at the apex of a sprawling hierarchy that he claims undermined him and his wife. It includes communications secretaries, ladies-in-waiting and a passel of junior aides who jockey on behalf of their royal bosses, sometimes to the detriment of other family members.
“I’d spent my life dealing with courtiers, scores of them,” Harry wrote. “But now I dealt mostly with just three, all middle-aged white men who’d managed to consolidate power through a series of bold Machiavellian maneuvers.”
Two people with ties to Buckingham Palace identified the courtiers as Edward Young, who served as private secretary to the queen; Clive Alderton, the private secretary to Charles; and Simon Case, who was private secretary to William and is now the government’s Cabinet Secretary, the highest post in the British civil service. The two people insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.
Over the years, my belief has grown that Simon Case was one of several Tory political operatives placed in Kensington Palace to groom William for his kingship. Not just his kingship, though – “King William” will be a right-wing stooge, a useful idiot for the ultra-conservative political and media establishment in Britain. Meanwhile, Edward Young was moved into Buckingham Palace after a massive power struggle in 2017, around the time that Prince Philip retired from public life. Young was and is “Charles’s man.” In many ways, Meghan and Harry were legitimately set up to fail in real time, in 2018-2019, but in other ways, the intra-palace dysfunction pre-2018 meant that no matter what, Harry was going to be exiled, betrayed, used as a pawn and worse.
The way Harry talks about the three insectival figures is some of the harshest but elegantly-composed ridicule in the entire book. The Bee (probably Young) is identified as the prime mover in the Megxit deal, steering everything to the eventual denouement with the tireless energy of a honey bee seeking its pollen: “The Bee was oval-faced and fuzzy and tended to glide around with great equanimity and poise, as if he was a boon to all living things.”
The Fly, likely Case, had “spent much of his career adjacent to and, indeed drawn to, s***. The offal of government and media and wormy entrails, he loved it, grew fat on it, rubbed his hands in glee over it”. Of course, Case eventually went on to become Boris Johnson’s cabinet secretary, with more its fair share of political dirt to dine upon, and also became embroiled in the stinky old Partygate fiasco (which, if his sobriquet of The Fly is accurate, would also have been greatly to his taste). At any rate, miraculously still in post, Case has proved tricky to swat.
The Wasp, likely Alderton, Harry found the trickiest: “Because he seemed so weedy, so self-effacing, you might be tempted to push back, insist on your point, and that was when he’d put you on his list. A short time later, without warning, he’d give you such a stab with his outsized stinger that you’d cry in confusion. ‘Where the f*** did that come from?’”
As I said, I haven’t finished the book yet, but given what we knew at the time and given what we know now, I feel like the Bee, Wasp and Fly are nowhere near as competent and all-powerful as Harry imagines. I understand why he feels that way, and God knows, the courtier system needs to be exposed, examined and dismantled. But what I’m saying is: these dudes are terrible at their jobs. They always were. This was always an utter clownshow.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.
They can be incompetent and still be in a position to use passive aggressive methods to inflict pain and cause damage. Anyone who has been in a workplace or office or, really, any group dynamic, knows and recognizes the type
Well said. Both things are true – they ARE incompetent and they are also very powerful and very influential and were capable of inflicting a great deal of damage.
Was coming here to say exactly this.
This particular clownshow will always thrive (in incompetency) because of this.
A-men. The number of powerful incompetent people (most often white males) in the workplace is rampant.
Exactly; they don’t have to be competent to be cruel.
Exactly. Incompetent people can cause devastation if given the confidence and power by their higher-ups. You see it everywhere.
They should be easy to spot, just look for the brown splodges on their collective noses. Mind you let’s sit back and watch, because can you imagine what’s going on now! Can’t you just see the three of them “well I’m the Bee because I work Sooo hard”. No, I’m the Bee because I know everything about everyone “,L. No I’m the Bee, because Charles loves me best. 😂🐝😂
I just finished reading the book, l cried many times, Harry and Meghan l feel for you, l love you guys!
Now I have the urge to go get a can of Raid.
You made me laugh out loud. I imagined the 3 constipated Grey men shrieking “RAID” and going POOF!
I cackled. It was great. And a good decision. I imagine he did it first and foremost for legal reasons but also because then these people cannot really complain in public? The Bee would have to out himself, for example. And Harry could go “Whaaaat I didn’t say it’s you!” They would look they desperately wanted to be talked about which is probably not something you do in fact want in that line of work.
I would also add that these people are two-faced liars who would happily drag Harry into court and perjure themselves to make him look bad. As you say for them to refute anything he’s said they would first have to “out themselves”. CHECK and MATE! 😆 😆 😆
The descriptions matching their nicknames are hilarious. PH and Moehringer deserve high praise.
I looked each of them up and the nicknames are perfection!
When is Philippa Gregory writing the fictionalized version of all this?
Thank you, @Kaiser. I have been waiting for these people to be exposed. I loved Harry’s description in the book of them, especially The Bee. Who is an arse, as the Brits would say. That he only had option five printed up for the Summit and then LIED to Harry’s face about it, makes his exposure even more sweet.
But but the printer wasn’t working. Except it was. Lying liars.
Yes, thank you. I always wondered how many there were and what position they held. Were they around causing Diana grief?
If Harry was an actual employee he’d likely have a case for constructive dismissal. The Sandringham Summit was effectively a meeting to set up a contractual agreement, but he had no representation and with his PTSD and emotions running high wasn’t really able to effectively represent himself. The outcome had been decided before the meeting started, with only the paperwork pertaining to that printed out. An employment lawyer or union rep would have been “STOP RIGHT THERE.” The whole thing was a set up. I bet they are absolutely kicking themselves they didn’t have him sign an NDA while he was there.
Bonkers that Harry needed a lawyer to deal with his own family. But then, this family definitely is bonkers.
Case is definitely the Fly. He is also on the Epstein flight list.
They can be incompetent failures at the long view, while still being exceedingly cunning and strategic at winning the short-term for their principles (and their own aspirations).
I think the overall problem, the reason why Harry never fit in, never “got it” is that, like his mother, be believes in things being good and right and fair. In love.
These people don’t. None of them.
It’s ONLY about power, strategies to gain it, gamesmanship to ensure it, the snakes and ladders of it.
For the Royals, it’s about compartmentalizing emotions, when you can’t smother and bury them, so you can fall in line and accept your place in the system. While letting your feelings bleed out passive aggressively to each other, aggressive aggressively to underlings, and honestly only to your teddy bear(s).
For the courtiers, they have no emotional stake, so can more viciously and cleanly carry out the power games – making their principle look good so they gain more power/influence with the principle which makes *them* look good, which gives them more power/influence with media and the wider world.
No one cared about how Harry and Meghan could modernize the monarchy or whatever. They counted on the public being easily manipulated (Harry mentions this in Spare), the same public that emotionally whipsawed between gobbling up Diana-the-crazy-bitch stories after the divorce (poor Charles, narrow escape) and sobbing with gusto after her death (poor Charles, single dad).
So they assumed the public would be all aboard with supporting the monarchy with the BM steering the opinion, putting H&M back in place.
They still think it’s possible. They’re even making inroads with US press, like that recent gross NYTimes article.
I was shocked at how many of my older (non white) relatives in the US had a negative view of H&M over Xmas. The spin that this is airing dirty laundry, FAMILY laundry (not institutional, never that), works. Older boomers flinch at their bad parenting being called out publicly, the facade of a happy family being exposed.
So no, I think the courtiers had their agendas and weren’t stupid.
It only looks incompetent and stupid when you take the 30,000 miles in the air view and see that the agendas are stupid, the monarchy is pointless and the status quo *should* be wrecked.
They weren’t hired to do that.
They may have even seen h&M’s potential to do that, why they wanted to crush their spark. You have two supernovas who threaten the hierarchy… So drastic measures taken to control the situation. I mean, cutting off financial support and security… That was like putting on a shock collar, right? “NOW HEEL!”
It didn’t work, but they’re still trying. The courtiers/institutional long view here is that the stars will burn out, the monarchy will ploddingly endure.
Obv I hope they’re wrong. But that NYTimes article… Man. The knives are out even here.
I don’t think Harry even cares anymore. I think he’s knows its a brick wall. He just doesn’t want it to fall on him, his wife and kids. That’s why he still talks about being open and willing to “help” his dad (from a distance) and that the ball is in their court. That’s why their spokesperson is talking about how they are looking forward and not back. I think Harry knows that he can’t win with those folks, they’ve been playing the game for too long. Best thing to do is exit all in one piece.
Harry said that he doesn’t care much about negativity towards him for speaking up. He wants truth and justice. He wants to break cycles. He wouldn’t go so hard at the British media if he cared about negative articles cause as he said Charles told him it can be a suicide mission. He knows the cost but to him it’s a mission worth taking the punches for.
I also noticed the NYT took a turn after they were accused of being anti monarchy from a chunk of the right wing British folk during the jubby/funeral.
They do still have articles that are scathing of the monarchy and supportive of Harry and Meghan but there has been an increase in “the other side.” Usually these articles are from a British person too..funny enough.
Anyways as H&Ms status has elevated to new levels these last few years I didn’t expect them to be loved by everyone. Especially as the topics they highlight aren’t fluffy…but serious issues I figured they would get some pushback. It’s just what happens with big name stars/activists but despite some of the fabricated hate from some sections of media..they still are succeeding and thriving. They’ve made enough money to be fully independent and not ever have to worry about security, lili/Archie’s future..etc.. I love that for them!!!
So well said, Lurker!
When did Knauf come onboard? Or was he explicitly named in the book? I had to take a break after finishing part one. It’s heavy. I’ll be back at this weekend though.
I agree Young is one of them. As for giving them too much power, I disagree. I’ve known some people that are completely incompetent in their actual jobs, but by God they can manipulate people and things into exactly what they want. If they had an actual work ethic, they could have been the next Madoff. Instead, they got their kicks moving people around like chess pawns.
Jason is mentioned as “Jason” around the time of Meghan first being slandered in the media.
I would love to read a business school case on this. So much bad leadership everywhere.
The Bee (Edward Young) was clearly the one who stonewalled Harry’s visit with TQ when she had said her whole week was free. Suddenly she couldn’t see him because her diary became mysteriously filled. When Harry spoke to her on the phone about it he said she sounded stilted, not herself, and he asked her if someone was in the room with her — *crickets*. So you know he was there making up all sorts of fake issues she needed to attend to immediately. I’m thrilled that those 3 bastards have been exposed. FAFO boys, FAFO.
Some powerful people are incompetent. See President Trump
I must admit to confusion…
I’ve long assumed that the queen and her family had the power and the courtiers (poorly) served them as advisors, etc but this book has me rethinking this.
1. The queen was not permitted to see Harry when he flew back from Canada in spite of having an apparently open calendar.
2. The courtiers determined the outcome of Harry’s exit and the conditions, and the queen sat quietly and let them steamroll the process.
So, what’s going on here? Does the royal family have any agency or are they merely puppets? Did the queen cede her power because she was so young and naive and never corrected that with time or did she never have it? If she never did, then these awful people are indeed trapped.
Someone please enlighten me. I just don’t get it!
I have similar questions. I just cannot give QE2 a pass. At one point re “beardgate” Harry tells Bill she’s the queen so if she says I can wear a beard, I’m wearing a beard. Apparently she has agency in that. But then she doesn’t speak up and say hell yeah, I’m going to see my grandson whether you like it or not? I don’t think Harry is able to see, and hold accountable dear granny’s passivity and her role and what happened. I can only conclude that it is too painful for him.
Thank you! I think this topic deserves some investigation.
I think QE 2 was lied to regularly, as in” Harry called to cancel”, and she would have no idea he was at the gate. My brother, the gatekeeper, did this to me often. She may be more of a victim than we think now that we know the power of those around her.
Then that is awful and she was a puppet! At her advanced age, to be so maliciously manipulated—that’s shameful. Harry had so many reasons to escape.