Spectator: Duchess Meghan is ‘upset & overwhelmed’… by ‘South Park’

Just three weeks ago, the right-wing British publication The Spectator had a piece about how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were dreadfully unpopular in California, they were never invited anywhere, Oprah “snubbed” them and their American dream has come crashing down because of British push-polling revealing their historic unpopularity with Waitrose shoppers. You get the idea – talking points were issued and the British right-wing media jumped at the chance to create a story to sneer at the Sussexes. It also revealed that after all this time, no one in Britain understands American culture, American celebrity or how Americans view the Sussexes, in general. Speaking of, the Spectator is now convinced that Duchess Meghan is super-upset by… South Park. Last week, South Park devoted an episode to the Sussexes, just as they devoted an episode to William and Kate years ago.

Harry and Meghan have yet to publicly speak about last week’s episode of South Park, presumably because they don’t have the staff left to formulate a press release. But California sources claim that Meghan has spent the last few days “upset and overwhelmed” about how she was portrayed.

If you’ve read anything about Harry and Meghan over the last three years, you’d think the pair would be delighted with how South Park parodied them. The entire episode, titled “The Worldwide Privacy Tour,” gives them enough fodder to moan for a few more books… or Netflix documentaries… or Spotify podcasts. Meghan can cry about how she is a victim of misogyny and Harry can claim that this was all a narrative concocted by the big, bad press.

In fairness, South Park didn’t hold back. Meghan is described as a “sorority girl, actress, influencer, victim,” by a brand manager during the episode. Later on, Harry has an awakening, realizing that their obsession with branding has made them “turn ourselves into products.” He claims that there will be, “no more magazines and Netflix shows, we can just live a normal life.” However, when he leaves, Meghan decides to stay — so the prince exits alone.

Ironically, after the episode aired, rumors began circulating that Harry and Meghan were so frustrated with the show that they are now “taking it out on each other.” At least their spousal disagreements are taking place in a nine-bedroom-sixteen-bathroom mansion. No awkward passings in the hallway for them.

Sources claim that Meghan, “is annoyed by South Park but refuses to watch it all.” But for Meghan, this couldn’t have come at a worse time. The duchess is said to be “obsessed with her half-sister’s litigation.” Meghan’s half-sister Samantha Markle is suing her for defamation following their tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey. The duchess had previously filed a motion to stop depositions in the case from taking place, but it was dismissed by Florida judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell earlier this month.

Then there’s a coronation. Meghan and Harry are supposedly “weighing up” whether they will attend or not, but according to sources close to her the duchess “feels excluded,” from the whole thing. Probably better to leave it then.

Aside from all of this, the pair have been made aware that nosey journalists, ahem, have been “poking around Archewell and asking serious questions about what they actually contribute.” This comes after the couple released a report tooting their own horn.

[From The Spectator]

It’s like… the Spectator hires people to write histrionic fan-fic about what the Sussexes are doing and how miserable they are, and none of it has any connection to what’s really going on in Harry and Meghan’s lives, but the Spectator just publishes it anyway. It’s really embarrassing… for the British media. Even more so because other British outlets have now picked up this fan-fic and they’re using it to bash Meghan for it. A closed loop, an echo chamber of deranged storylines, all revealing their unhinged obsession with the Sussexes.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Archewell.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

145 Responses to “Spectator: Duchess Meghan is ‘upset & overwhelmed’… by ‘South Park’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Emily_C says:

    No she isn’t.

    I just got to the part of “Spare” where Harry says Britons do seem to be more gullible than most of the world, in that they believe their tabloid press. And well. Yeah. I’ve seen British people I had clocked as intelligent and savvy swallow the dumbest lies about Meghan and Harry whole. I know plenty don’t too, like those who comment here regularly, but it’s a problem.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I was just going to ask if the British (or the majority of them) actually believe this 🐂💩. They don’t have the staff left to formulate a press release? No one with two brain cells would believe that.

      As for their reaction to the SP episode, I’m sure they’re not nearly as upset about it as W&K are about theirs.

      • Rae S-L says:

        I’m British and I’m certainly am not gullible, including most of my friends. It is those who have an unhealthy obsession with the royal family who will swallow anything that is fed to them.

    • daro says:

      hmmm. Fox news, anyone. Even the Fox journalists, execs know how gullible a ton of americans are…

      • Emily_C says:

        Yes, but those are particular Americans. WAY too many of them, but — how do I put this. Intelligent people do not believe Fox News. Whereas, as I said, I’ve seen otherwise intelligent, left-leaning Brits buy into crap about Harry and Meghan, and other tabloid targets, without thinking twice. There is a difference.

      • BusyBea says:

        FOX news the organization owned by Murdoch that also owns the UK Sun and Times. Murdoch has been desperately trying to turn American News into tabloid news….just like it is in the UK

    • Snuffles says:

      Well, to be fair, the UK is the only country I know where tabloids are seen as equal to legitimate news outlets like BBC. They are given daily platforms on morning and nightly news. That would be like the US giving TMZ and the Enquirer daily segments on our morning and nightly news shows.

      The UK have been consuming a steady diet of crap their entire lives. They wouldn’t recognize responsible journalism if it smacked them in the face.

      ETA: At least with Fox News, Americans have the option of avoiding it all together.

      • RoyalBlue says:

        The crux of the matter is the fourth estate is tightly controlled and used as a tool by the wealthy to influence the masses and maintain the status quo. If people had their blinders off surely, they would oppose this crap.

      • kirk says:

        This storyline is beyond stupid. Harry & Meghan docuseries clocked 81.5M viewing hours for first 3 segments ( 27.1 avg per episode) compared to <2M SP viewers on average. Back in 2020 SP clocked highest 7-yr viewership for their pandemic episode – only by broadcasting across multiple Comedy Central sister channels (TVLand, MTV, VH1, Pop, Paramount, etc.) did they get above 4M.

      • BusyBea says:

        Murdoch echo chamber in USA: Fox News, TMZ, New York Post, Wall Street Journal etc. Murdoch is a threat to Democracy in the USA. Hope he pays billions for voter scandal.

      • SenseOfTheAbsurd says:

        UK has at least two formerly respectable broadsheets which have gradually been changed into unethical propaganda mills, the worst being the Daily Telegraph and The Times. Lots of people take them seriously because of former reputation, but they shouldn’t.

        Daily Telegraph coverage of the devastating New Zealand cyclone that caused incredible damage and a death toll of 11 (so far), was instructive. Whole towns underwater, bridges and roads washed out, devastation to farms and orchards, people drowning trapped in their roof cavities, and for days the only Daily Telegraph story about it was that it had changed Princess Anne’s itinerary. Guarantee that if Jacinda Ardern had still been PM, there would have been multiple stories about how the terrible tyrant had botched the response, but because there wasn’t that propaganda angle, they just completely ignored it for days. That’s not a real newspaper.

      • Sue E Generis says:

        The BBC has quoted tabs and lets those ‘reporters’ on their platform. I had always believed that the BBC was the paper of record. Now I know they’re just another propaganda arm of the RF. I don’t understand how they’re not embarrassed.

    • ABritGuest says:

      I’m British & find that people claim the tabloids are trash but they eat it up. Not helped by fact that tabloid narratives are pushed everywhere & therefore lead the agenda. Imagine Biden writing articles in the enquirer or CNN reading out headlines from US weekly or the star (?) daily & having their stories on national radio daily
      . That’s what we have in Britain so even if you avoid buying papers, clicking on tabloid websites- it seems to permeate the consciousness. US posters need to watch out as a few uk tabloids are moving into the US market & hiring for US offices 🙄

      The story is completely made up like most H&M stories have been since they cut off palace leakers. But it shows what Meghan said on Oprah that even when she was quiet& didn’t leave the house – it didn’t stop thousand of articles being written about her. The media have built a model around Meghan content & as much as they claim she should shut up, her being quiet doesn’t stop them discussing her. That’s why despite my reservation about retreading old ground with the docuseries -I now see it’s important they put their side out.

      The press want H&M to act on South Park or to be upset about it but why would they when South Park ep just repeated the same false misogynistic crap that the tabloids put out? I haven’t watched it but saw a clip that they even had the tabloid/royalist dream that Harry leaves Meghan. I mean I’m sure they’ve heard worse then that from Harry’s relatives let alone a satire show

      • kirk says:

        Oh I think we all know it’s not just limited to tabloids when you get picture of 2 middle-age dudes in a bathtub on the cover of Telegraph supposedly ‘proving’ that Prince Andrew couldn’t have sex with a trafficked teenager. Even Reuters is unable to completely avoid the taint when they pick up a vile Times headline here and there. Meghan said she read the Economist while she was over there, but some of us remember them photoshopping Barack Obama to look more beleaguered.

    • Caribbean says:

      I believe people have gotten it all twisted as to what it was about the Tabs they hated in the UK. Stories were being printed about them that were lies and they could not defend them, while the palace say they could not defend them.Yet, they defended Kate and Will which made it seems the stores about the Sussexes were true. Now, they have the freedom to answer or not, pay attention or not. On their term

    • laura says:

      in the same vein, we believe all the stuff from the tabloids about william and kate and use it to mock them. what’s the difference?

      • kirk says:

        Speak for yourself. My only interest in Willy & Kitty was after my Suits girl married into BRFCo thinking I should educate myself on odd family which I came to realize is just a business. Also realized there’s not much going on with W&K. After coming to these realizations, my interest in Harry’s birth family fell to zero.

      • Caribbean says:

        Stories about William and Kate are usually defended, when they think it is needed, by the palace. Stories on William and Kate are very mild ,and or down right kissing their ass. Also they use the Sussexes to distract from all the crap they do. While stories about the Sussexes (fed by the…) were not defended, were and still is, VILE and show the writers desire to destroy the Sussexes and more specifically, Meghan

    • Evan Quinn says:

      It’s confirmation bias. They decided H&M are evil, because they abandoned home and family, so they search for info that proves it.

  2. Becks1 says:

    This is an absolutely disgusting and deranged take on….well, everything relating to H&M. The dig about “not having staff” to issue a press release, journalists poking around Archewell, the mention of their bathrooms!!!

    The british press just seem to be so obsessed with H&M and its beyond disturbing. THEY LEFT. THEY’RE JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU. Talk about someone else. If you want to dig into a charitable organization with questionable practices, W&K’s foundation is RIGHT THERE. Earthshot is RIGHT THERE. The Prince’s Foundation is RIGHT THERE.

    • lanne says:

      I know–it’s so crazy and stalkerish. The British media are the crazy obsessed ex who won’t let go. It’s personal in an way that’s unprofessional. It’s nothing but Fox News over there–all of the media condones the lies that are told for the sake of ratings. This is a really dark chapter in the history of the royal family and the history of the British media. I just wonder how long this anti-Sussex campaign can be sustained. For 10 more years? 20? Will they still be whining about how “they can’t turn America against the Sussexes” 50 years from now? Will they be complaining that Harry and Meghan are taking attention away from the Wailes? Will they be claiming that Kate is the true geriatric beauty and not Meghan? Will they be counting wrinkles and comparing them? Will they be complaining that wrinkles are actually better because Kate has more of them?

    • Jais says:

      It’s the idea that releasing a report about archwell is just them tooting their own horn. It’s called transparency. 🙄

    • Jenn says:

      It was hilarious!!

    • BusyBea says:

      @Becks1: They don’t care about any of that stuff. They ONLY care about ONE thing: PUNISHING Harry….that’s it.

  3. C-Shell says:

    Welp. I’m a broken record, but “histrionic fan fiction” is a very diplomatic way to characterize this unadulterated horse shit. It’s like, I could barely finish reading it because I was so stunned by the sheer mendacity in every line. My god. It IS embarrassing for the British press and consumers thereof because it’s so obviously and gleefully misstating American culture, the legal process and the Sussexes’ accomplishments within it.

    • kirk says:

      I didn’t even bother reading it. Neither will Meghan, so they won’t succeed in getting a rise out of her. Sounds like Harry is learning to put himself on digital diet, so there’s room for hope there.

  4. Loretta says:

    Another bad fanfiction

  5. Brit says:

    They seem upset that Meghan hasn’t been outside and living/working in peace and they also seem pissed that no one in the American press is really talking about the South Park episode. This is wishful thinking at its finest. They want a reaction and I’m sure they’ve been asked for comment from all those tabloids and still no response. The problem is that the press have lost control of the Sussexes and keeping trying to get it back. They can’t use the kids, taxpayer excuse, polls etc. Literally no one cares about this South Park episode except them. It’s laughable. They know that Samantha Markle case will likely be dismissed as well. This seems like true desperation.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Exactly. The funny thing is last month the press didn’t know where she was and now we’re supposed to believe that they know what she thinks about South Park and Scammy’s lawsuit. This piece just screams desperation.

    • truthSF says:

      So true! To think they had control/first Dib of any Sussex content in the palm of their ✋️ and just….threw it all away in less than 2 years. All because of their cockiness, arrogance, and just an overall stupidity of putting all their eggs in the “abuse Meghan (& Harry) at all cost, and never give her room to breathe” basket!

      The Windsors promised the British media that they will have unlimited access to abuse the Sussexes in exchange for hiding the rest of the family’s skeletons, but the Sussexes rejected said abuse, and took their power back and bounced, all in a span of 18 months!

      • Jais says:

        You’re so right @truthSF, it must kill them to know they had first access and as you said, threw it away. All bc they could not stop bullying and demeaning her and really just thought she would take it.

      • Evan Quinn says:

        Speaking of which, the sudden flood of attacks in the media and on Twitter leads me to believe there’s something big and bad about to drop about the RF. It all feels like a diversion.

    • ThatsNotOkay says:

      FORBES magazine over here wrote an article about the episode and talked about how one-sided and stupid it was—a missed chance to point out the gullibility and obsessiveness of a particularly vitriolic and uneducated segment of the populous. And how it ended up unwittingly dredging up the 2011/12 South Park episode about Peggington, who tears off Kate’s arm and pegs himself in public!

  6. equality says:

    “Meghan can cry about how she is a victim of misogyny and Harry can claim that this was all a narrative concocted by the big, bad press.” She IS a victim of misogyny and the SP episode DID rely on the narrative concocted by the press and not what H&M have actually said. But, if H&M point out the simple truth, they are “crying”. What is the economic line where it is okay for somebody to fight back against abuse? Very poor with no house, a tiny house, middle class…?

    • Jais says:

      Right? She IS a victim of misogyny. Like what even is this? They really want Meghan to be upset and overwhelmed and crying. Like they want her to feel bad for existing. It’s some evil shit.

    • otaku fairy says:

      Exactly. Even if she was initially bothered by it to some degree, that wouldn’t be an unreasonable response considering what’s actually being made fun of: her not silently allowing abusive behaviors to destroy her, and her continuing to exist and work afterward. Misogynists never seem to realize that gleefully calling women out for that isn’t some kind of win, it just shows their childish, sadistic side.
      It wouldn’t be surprising if it didn’t bother her though. This show hasn’t been relevant since the Bush administration and is the work of two republican men who seem to be stuck at 16.

  7. Snuffles says:

    BM are toddlers screaming for attention. Or Eddie from AbFab throwing a tantrum

    https://youtu.be/RhMD2-CRj1o

    Makes you wonder how low their bank accounts are these days. They’re desperate for the Sussex’s to respond or show their faces.

    • Brit says:

      Yep. Harry and especially Meghan being quiet and living peacefully is making them antsy. Meghan is also being quiet disrupts their narratives and they need money. Poor babies 😂 all those royal podcasters want a sighting so bad because the others are so boring.

      • Mary Pester says:

        BRIT your so right, I AM a Brit and I’m so sick of their narrative about harry and meghan. They are obviously suffering withdrawal symptoms because they can’t see or get near Harry or Megan. I honestly think there are editors and reporters running around pulling their hair out because they don’t know what to write next. Knowing Harry and Megan they both probably laughed their assd off IF they did see it, and if they didn’t, they really don’t care because they know the media is after a reaction. How I would love to see just one reporter, British or American write an article asking how Kate and William reacted to the episode about them! Now as for sniffing around Archwell. Archwell have published their accounts, funny how the media didn’t comment very much then. But my biggest fear here, is that the media know the only way they can hurt Harry and Megan is to go after the things they support, like their Archwell foundation and invictus. They know that would destroy both of them to lose those. But equally important, it would destroy all of the good work Harry and Megan have done and still do. The British rags don’t care about anything unless it’s making them money. I’m so bloody ashamed of the British rags and the British side of the Royal family

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Mary Pester, I don’t think they can go after Archewell. Rupert Murdoch is getting an upclose and personal look at defamation in the US with the Dominion and Smartmatic lawsuits. I don’t think he wants another one. I don’t think that the credible media in the US would jump on that bandwagon, and there are thousands of local newspapers out there. H&M have been building their Archewell reputation. Harry wrote a book and exposed the bm. I see in this article that they haven’t really said anything negative about Archewell. It does show that the bm is going through garbage cans to find anything to talk about. They need to be careful about that, garbage in some states is considered private and they’ll get into hot water for that.

  8. Goldenkatz says:

    The spectator knows what every other British publication does— nothing sells like H and M stories. No one wants to read about Kate’s few charities or William shearing sheep. Also few want to read Spectator’s Tory stanning. But the Montecito pair? People will read right-wing half-baked dreck about that. Best reaction is to tune these pubs out and laugh at their desperate attempt at click bait. They’re no Oprah or Netflix or Spotify.

    • Hail says:

      The Spectator definitely knows this, that’s why Harry and Meghan are the only royals that appear on their header. Like the Forbes article said, South Park missed an opportunity to poke fun at the obsessive british media and their followers. Their reaction to this episode only proves their downright weird and violent obsession with the Sussexes. But when your creators are mostly old white men, then of course calling a 10 year veteran “dumb” and his double-majored Northwestern graduate wife “stupid” and “a bitch” is considered comedy. This type of global bullying is how people take their lives. I’m glad Meghan is in a better place and she protects her mental health by not reading all of this but Harry knows everything that’s written about them.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        I haven’t watched the whole episode. (the only SP episode I watched in it’s entirety was the Trapped in the Closet/Co$ ep) The other day I saw the clip of the lunchroom scene. That gave me pause to step back and look at the H&M ep in a different way. It kind of came down to the word parody.

        There are a lot of different definitions of parody. Some are similar. The majority of UK/Brit definitions seem to rely on parody being of a deliberate negative connotation. There are American definitions of parody being a deliberate intent to over exaggerate something/someone. Satire is often used to ridicule institutions that are ridiculing people. (Like the BM)

        IMO, SP was parodying H&M (American definition) and mocking the BM/derangers. Meghan & Harry haven’t been obsessing about their “brand”. Have they ever even used the word brand when talking about their work/themselves? A quick google search of “Meghan Harry brand”, lol, brings up multiple mentions of RR’s discussing it. Not H&M. The BM/derangers/bots have been the ones spewing the nonsense. Not H&M.

        I don’t know. Do know that after the Co$ ep. Scientology went after Parker & Stone. Co$ was digging into their literal garbage to find stuff out about them. Hmmm..sounds like the BM. The SP ep seemingly to be a repetition of BM/tabloids may very well have been a mimicry of the BM/tabloids.

        Meghan understands how SP works. She also has a good understanding of sarcasm. Pretty sure she’s not up in too many feelings about this SP ep. Meghan survived a malicious, evil smear campaign while pregnant. The SP ep is nothing. It is funny that it came out after Sasha whateverherlastnameis World Privacy Tour. The Invasion of Privacy Tour when no privacy was invaded except by herself and maybe the BM.

    • Princessk says:

      I don’t believe a word of it. The Spectator needs to publish its ‘sources’…more lies .
      South Park is vile and should be ignored.
      What the media leave out is the fact that the episode also makes fun of people who say they are fed up with H&M but can’t stop reading about them.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Kara Kennedy, not a close relative of American Kennedy’s (don’t even know if there is any relation), is Welsh and lives in London. Yep..love ‘California sources’.lol Her sources seem to be like that WanKy Welsh Wally creature.

        The lunchroom scene is definitely a mockery of the British Media/tabloids. Seriously. Who has been pissing and moaning about H&M every day for the last 6/7 years? Meghan & Harry go on silent mode for months just working privately and the BM cannot stop talking about them even when H&M are quiet. The British Media/tabloids are trying to spread a contagion that has no correlation to reality. WE’RE TIRED OF THEM BUT WE’LL STILL TALK ABOUT THEM EVERY F*CKING DAY!!!!

  9. Concern Fae says:

    Why do I have the feeling her reaction was “South Park is still on?”

    • daro says:

      Yes! :)))

    • Amy Bee says:

      Ditto. It was definitely my reaction.

      • B says:

        The woman who had to buy the couch for the royal cottage is phased at 20 seconds on SP?!?

        God I hope she left it there for the next person.

      • Eurydice says:

        @B – that was my first thought. Meghan survived years in that royal/tabloid hellhole – I think she can handle South Park.

      • thaisajs says:

        Right? My reaction, too. I thought it got canceled years ago. I don’t know what cable channel it would even be on anymore. Comedy Central? SP became irrelevant to the US national dialogue years ago.

    • Christina says:

      Because it rings true. She is too busy to care.

    • Princessk says:

      Exactly, I don’t believe a word of what is in the Spectator, jumping on the ‘making money out the Sussexes’ bandwagon.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    What did I just read? Is the biggest fanfic ever written about Harry and Meghan? It has to be up there with Camilla Tominey’s latest piece. And why are they expecting Harry and Meghan to put out a statement about South Park? The British press are so desperate to hear from Harry and Meghan. But last month they were begging Harry and Meghan to shut up.

  11. Maxine Branch says:

    You know you are on the right side of history and are doing amazingly well when an entire country obsesses over you. The Sussexes are living their best lives and dreams in California and the gutter outlets can not handle not being privy to their thoughts and moves. I love this for them and as Harry mentioned in Harry and Meghan, they are moving forth and Californian is home to him, his wife and children. The SP spoof is done and gone and as we all know those type of shows as well as late night shows only target folks that are the “now” and will generate the most views.

    • Brit says:

      Harry’s book and the documentary really destroyed the press regarding the Sussexes and their story. They’ll never admit though. Harry and Meghan leaving was truly the best thing in hindsight.

      • KP says:

        It destroyed the press narrative but when the British media parrots all the same talking points some people will still get caught up in the lies.
        It’s a double edged sword for Meghan especially. When she keeps quiet it leaves a massive vaccum where the British tabloids can make up any lie about her and it goes unchallenged. Sometime US press picks it up sometimes they don’t.
        Luckily most of this stays in the tabloids so it doesn’t reach a massive audience outside of the UK. But my god it’s literally all opinion taken as fact. Unbelievable
        Please flood the Meghan hashtag with some truth instead of repeating tabloid talking points.

      • Princessk says:

        Yes, and I notice one or two ‘journalists’ who are regular recipients of leaked info from the Palace have been rather quiet. Harry alluded to one in ‘Spare’ who it seems his father has in his pocket.

  12. Cessily says:

    Duchess Meghan has not uttered a single word to the public or press or been seen in public since December of last year! The British racist hate propaganda machine is working overtime on someone’s orders, Peggy and cowmilla are my guess.

  13. ShazBot says:

    God, I pity Brits. I’m sorry to those here, who are aware, but what a sad little life to lead. Spiralling down the economic toilet bowl and zombie marching along behind a right wing press that feeds such obvious and psychotic lies and just eating it all up. I’d say what a sad state it’s become, but maybe it was always like that?

  14. No I think they are projecting on the Sussexes what Peg and Can’t are feeling about the South Park episode about them being brought up again. More crap to cover Peg and Can’t not having any kind of love or chemistry for one another. Have to go after Harry and Meg and say they are angry at each other. Pure filth from the bm.

    • Snuffles says:

      This. 100% projection. The Cambridges are furious that their old episode was brought up again and #princeofpegging started trending.

  15. lanne says:

    Meghan talks. British media: HOW DARE SHE SPEAK?

    Meghan appears in public: British media: HOW DARE THAT ATTENTION SEEKER APPEAR IN PUBLIC?

    Meghan silent. British media: HOW DARE SHE REMAIN SILENT!

    Meghan stays home. British media: HOW DARE THAT ATTENTION SEEKER NOT SEEK ATTENTION!

    I wish the British people would start rejecting this nonsense. Because someone else will be a target next–another woman, likely a woman of color. Don’t British women care about misogyny? Do they just take this shit? (Yes, you can come back and ask if Americans just take gun violence–no, we don’t. But I’m fine as an American with it being called out. It should be called out and often!)

    • Mary Pester says:

      LANNE, I’M British and I bloody care, I’m so sick of it. I mentioned the other week that I have written letter after letter to the Daily Mirror and none were published, so I tried an experiment. Myself and( if I remember correctly) it was 9 or 10 of my friends, and family, ALL sent a letter to the Daily Mirror speaking out against the treatment of Harry and Megan on the same day
      NOT ONE was published, and even after another letter, this in the form of an official complaint, nothing was done and no reply. It seems they won’t give up and treat them as cash machines

  16. Jay says:

    I can’t tell if the BM actually think South Park is some powerful cultural barometer in America or if they are just pretending. SP hasn’t been relevant since the early 2000’s, and unlike the rest of his family, Harry is smart enough not to Streisand effect the whole thing by commenting.

    Honestly, compared to the unhinged nastiness of the British media, South Park is pretty mild. I’m much more troubled by Jeremy Clarkson publishing his sick revenge fantasies.

  17. RoyalBlue says:

    Sounds like that island is a propaganda state similar to North Korea, China and Russia.

    • Snuffles says:

      I know we joke but they are well on their way. When England finally loses the entire Commonwealth they will become a hermit kingdom just like North Korea with William as their dictator.

      • Emily_C says:

        Nah. More oligarchy, and certainly not as bad as North Korea. I also hope that the citizens can turn things around, though it’s going to take fighting their press as well as their government. But it’s not like the Brits are known for being a quiescent people, historically.

    • Mary Pester says:

      It is and it’s getting worse. They are even putting a bill through parliament trying to ban demonstrations and strikes!

  18. Noor says:

    The media is protected by law on free speech and free press and to what end.. to produce garbage .

  19. Jais says:

    Rumors that there’s tension between Meghan and Harry? Where are those rumors coming from? The fevered dreams of the rota? They’re making up some lies. Whew.

    • Athena says:

      Meghan and Harry were not standing next to each other at Ellen and Portia’s vow renewal therefore there must be trouble in paradise according to the the British press.

    • TheWigletOfWails says:

      They’ve brought this back to cover up for the douches of Cornwall? If there’s tension between Harry and Meghan then chuckles has ordered the wailses to divorce. They should go focus on KKKate desperately trying and failing to hold Peggy’s hand and him ignoring her when she almost fell walking up the steps.

  20. Gina says:

    SP would make an episode about everyone who brings in clicks. Simple as that. In other words, this episode is the proof of H&M popularity. Typical celebrity culture. American celebrity culture, not British. MO.

  21. C says:

    Harry and Meghan do not care.

  22. Rapunzel says:

    If anything, Meghan was “upset and overwhelmed” by how unfunny SP has become.

    And any argument with Harry over this was probably:

    M: “South Park really has gone downhill. I can’t believe these arevthe same people who wrote ‘Blame Canada'”

    H: “I always preferred ‘What Would Brian Boitano do?'”

    M: “What!? How could you!?”

  23. Colleen says:

    I’m so sure Harry and Meghan are that pressed about a show that has a piece of 💩 as it’s Christmas character.

    Must be mistaking them for Pegs and Waity again…..

  24. Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

    I’m going to be honest and admit that I love South Park. I loved it when it began (although when I see early episodes now, I’m like “I thought this was funny??”), then I went through a period where I lost interest in it, and I’d say about 3-4 years ago I sort of rediscovered it, and I think it’s better than ever. I absolutely acknowledge that it has been extremely problematic on occasion, the JLo episode was racist AF. The Mormon episode, on the other hand, was surprisingly open-minded. I also think it’s worth mentioning that the “worst”I character, the one with the most deplorable world view, is Cartman. Cartman and his bigoted views are almost always regarded by the other characters with the contempt that they deserve. think that the creators have matured and been focusing more on satirizing people’s CHOICES. In fact, I think South Park is better than ever, and WAY less problematic. I mean, the show has had 26 seasons(!!!) A show meant to make fun of people is going to have some problematic moments in 26 seasons. But those moments are fewer and farer between these days.
    Regarding the Harry & Meghan episode, I am an ardent supporter of them, yet I would have had NO problem with South Park making fun of them, If the episode HAD BEEN FUNNY. It was NOT, it was weak, very VERY weak. I would say the same thing about the Will & Kate episode only because in 2011, Wills sexual fetishes were hardly on the radar of the average viewer, and so the pegging Kate’s arm would have just seemed gratuitous.
    And I SERIOUSLY doubt that Meghan is stressing about friggin SOUTH PARK. Certain people just want the satisfaction of imagining that the episode actually DOES say something about her popularity in the US, and that she knows it, and is just boo-hooing non stop about it. When we know that the episode indicates exactly fuck-all about Americans opinion of her.

    • C says:

      “Certain people just want the satisfaction of imagining that the episode actually DOES say something about her popularity in the US”

      This is why they’re annoyed. It DOES say something about their popularity in the US – that they are public figures that people are interested in despite South Park characters crying they just don’t care, lol.
      It’s like what other people said in the other post. All it does is show their cultural presence if South Park decided they were notable enough to be commenting on.

      This is a show that had Cartman cook a teenager’s parents into a pot of chili, everyone knows what this show is about, lol. It’s not exactly the same as something like António Guterres going up on a podium at the UN and blasting them, which is how the papers and “news sources” about them suing are treating it.

      The reports about “suing” are the same ones that people went on about when Tom Bower’s book came out and so many other nonsensical things. Everyone was saying they’d sue then too. Of course they didn’t, and they won’t now.

      • Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

        oh you’re absolutely correct that the episode DOES say that Americans are interested in H&M, I was just saying that it doesn’t indicate anything about people’s OPINIONS of them, the fact that they were portrayed negatively.

        the fact is that South Park is a show that makes fun of people. certainly some deserve it more than others, but if a celebrity or a politician or a royal or whoever is portrayed on South Park, it WILL be a negative portrayal. that is a GIVEN. No one is portrayed on South Park in a way that is flattering, EVER. So the fact that H& M were portrayed in an unflattering way is par for the course with that show. it says nothing about the majority of American opinions.

      • C says:

        No I totally understood! It’s just funny.
        Seriously, like I said, people are always trying to say they’ll sue with every parody or negative story about them. They aren’t going to, it’s just clickbait.

        This episode wasn’t even really that bad…or funny. They’ve done better parodies of public figures, my favorite was the Crossing Over John Edwards one as “the biggest douche in the universe” with the Miss America song, LOL.

    • Hail says:

      This! They had the opportunity to take funny parts in Harry’s book and use it to their advantage like other American comedians but instead they got all of their jokes directly from the same tabloids that are known for lying and manipulating.

      • kirk says:

        SP “got all of their jokes directly from the same tabloids that are known for lying and manipulating.”
        Well yeah, takes less effort.

  25. Heather says:

    Why are they so obsessed with them?!? I mean, I know why ($$$$$), but geez. They left the UK 3 years ago. They’re like stalkers.

    • Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

      They’re obsessed with H&M because almost ALL of the remaining royals are boring as hell, and don’t sell magazines or get clicks. I’m getting bored just writing about them.

      What made the tabloids such juicy reading in the past, was the fact that they had ACCESS to a world closed off to 99.9999% of us. That and the fact that people used to be much more awed and impressed by royals, and the tabloids probably felt like the royals were sharing their lives with the readers. People want to read about H&M, but they know the tabloids have no access to them. I think more and more people are starting to view tabloid stories about H&M with some skepticism. Mostly young people, but who cares about the 90 year old royalists, anyway?

  26. Islandgirl says:

    They are desperate for a response ….or something from Harry and Meghan.
    Harry and Meghan please continue to ignore them.
    BRF also wants them to say or do something to take the focus away from the minor and major scandals.

  27. Nomore says:

    This will truly never stop…not until they find another “Diana and Meghan” if that ever comes along.
    So with that in mind anyone have ideas of how Meghan can counter this?
    They are just making up sht and it’s sent to print. No sources just vibes. How does she fight against this?
    Does she do kardashian style briefing or leave it alone?
    I realized after Oprah, Netflix and Spare that a lot of normal people have no idea what Meghan and Harry had been going through. So maybe not everyone believes or sees the fanfics but still..
    what can she do? or maybe the question is how should I respond? without an audience they wouldn’t be writing any of this.

    • Snuffles says:

      They should just continue to ignore it. Deprive them of oxygen until they die off or move onto another subject.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a fair number of tabloid writers will have to pivot because the Sussex money train has dried up for them and they need to seek new sources of income.

  28. susan says:

    so interesting how these people praise the “never complain, never explain” when it’s Charles, William, Andrew and Camilla, but they have such a problem when H&M choose not to respond.

    the tabloids are trying to goad them into engaging. Harry and Meghan are so much smarter than that.

    • Iolanthe says:

      Ignoring , not reacting and going about their lives is the best thing Harry and Meghan could do. Will looks like he is about to spontaneously combust and Kate is so desperate to keep up a front . The Waleses are pathetic .

  29. one of the marys says:

    “Harry and Meghan have yet to publicly speak about last week’s episode of South Park, presumably because they don’t have the staff left to formulate a press release.”

    Ugh this part. The constant drip drip drip of ‘have yet to reply… have yet to speak’ They told everyone they would no longer reply. That’s why they’re not replying!!

    • Rapunzel says:

      They accuse H&M of a hypocritical “worldwide privacy tour” but can’t stand them actually being private. They’re now insulting them for keeping their word.

    • LooseSeal says:

      This also shows how they’re accustomed to getting a press release for every little thing. Why would H&M issue a press release about this? Is it 1997? That’s not even good media relations strategy. That’s some Jason Knauff weak sauce.

  30. Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

    Also that sad sack Tom Bower was clearly TRYING very very hard, to get sued by H&M. The sheer number of verifiable LIES (is that an oxymoron?) in his book, lies that can be EASILY demonstrated to be so, by 30 second Google searches, were intended to provoke a law suit, a ridiculous plan concocted by him and his tabloid buddies, no doubt due to the fact that the tabloids are becoming increasingly desperate for fodder, ever since their access was effectively cut off, samurai style, by H&M. that is the only possible reason that I could see for the HUNDREDS of RIDICULOUS lies in that sad little man’s book.
    PS- do you think it caused him ACTUAL physical pain, to see Harry’s book sales eclipse his in approximately the first 0.3 SECONDS it was on sale? I like to think it did, ESP since he didn’t get the lawsuit he and the tabloids wanted, and all he’s left with is a joke of a book that will serve only to destroy any credibility he might have actually had at one point.

    • Tom Bower forgot that Meghan is way smarter than him. She knows his strategy and the only way to counter it is to ignore the old man. Now he ends up the laughingstock. Meghan is unbowed.

  31. JanetDR says:

    I was just happy to see the bathroom count has not lost it’s appeal 🤣🤣🤣

  32. honeychild says:

    Unfortunately, it appears a whole “hate Meghan” cottage industry has been created in the UK to “expose her” and protect the monarchy (aka racist, patriarchal status quo) and continue to make money off her back with pay per click views (saving royal reporter jobs). This will be an ongoing battle for them for years to come, at least until W&Ks kids grow up because Lord knows their parents do not have the charisma needed for their roles in this modern age. I hear the Dutch and Swedish royals are far more charismatic. Anyway, it’s so interesting that the UK media never really come as hard for Harry as they do Meghan, even though their whole situation was by his lead. Nope, all their ire is always for Meghan. In their eyes, Harry is the poor gullible doofus who got duped by the evil, Black seductress. The misogynoir of it all.

    • True says:

      This is where I struggle when Harry says he wants to help change the royals participation with the British media( paraphrasing) because Meghan always ends up getting the brunt of the abuse.
      Minus the Samantha lawsuit which I think will be thrown out Harry’s been in the headlines for the last few months. I feel like theyve left Meghan alone for the most part or the stuff they’ve tried has led to tons of pushback especially since the Jeremy Clarkson article.
      It was way worse around summer when every royal book imaginable came out.
      All this to say I hope Harry proceeds wisely on how he wants to tackle British media. I feel like his best strategy is earning enough money to buy one of this news orgs or befriending of these newspapers owners like the royals and government do.

  33. Meghan is definitely not upset by this fan fiction. Because she doesn’t care anymore what these tabloids say. She’s numbed and immune. And this is what the tabloids are boiling mad about. They cannot shake Meghan no matter what they throw at her to give them her attention. Meghan says FU all !

  34. freddy says:

    If Meghan has even watched “South Park”–EVER–let alone now as the mother two young children, I’ll eat a tiara….

    • Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

      I bet she probably HAS seen South Park. So what?? Who hasn’t??

      I doubt its preferred viewing for her kids, but I would bet the meager contents of my bank account that Meghan has absolutely seen South Park.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Um, I haven’t. Granted, I’m a nobody, but still.

      • CheChe says:

        Umm ,not everyone has seen South Park. It appeals to some and not to others. It isn’t a cultural touch point but a taste preference. I have a sizeable network of friends and acquaintances that have no taste for that type of humor. Best not to assume what Meghan enjoys watching because it ends up sounding like the BM echo chamber.

      • freddy says:

        @Annalise, Well, my point was that I doubt that with countless other things happening in her life—being glued to an animated show that uses insult instead of humor for relevancy, is probably not something M has the bandwidth for…let alone the energy to be pissed about how she’s being portrayed. I don’t know anyone over 40 who watches this show.

      • Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

        @beaniebean- I am TOTALLY confused by your comment- “Um, I haven’t [seen South Park]. Granted, I’m a nobody, but still.”

        huh???? If you actually HAVEN’T seen SP then technically I’m incorrect to say “Who hasn’t [seen SP]??” And that’s ok! There are MUCH worse things to be incorrect about! But Im confused by the injection of self loathing……

  35. QuiteContrary says:

    Meghan and Harry HAVE responded to the “South Park” episode — their silence is their response.

    The show doesn’t merit any other response.

  36. JCallas says:

    The Digger story fizzled out, so the right wing press’s new fixation is South Park. I’m sure they’re also the ones funding Scamantha’s ridiculous lawsuit.

  37. MsIam says:

    Next week South Park will be on to someone new. Meghan and Harry are not going to waste their time bothering about this blip. The trashloids are so used to the other royals jumping at every little thing that it is killing them the way the Sussexes ignore their existence.

  38. jj says:

    Omg guys Meghan’s so upset about a South Park show with 500k viewers (she got more views on tik tok and Twitter videos) at best and not about the Jeremy Clarkson article or political article that were way worse and dehumanizing to her. Omg!!
    It’s over for her now because South Park mocked her like they do every celebrity and royal. How will she ever move on.
    No one will ever work with her.
    “Tune in next week when we try and find something else to cancel Meghan with.”
    I feel like pretty soon we’ll be hearing about a big partnership or brand deal for Meghan I just feel it.

    • Kel says:

      It was supposed to be over for Meghan after the Oprah interview, then after the fake bullying review, then the daily mail court docs, then after Tina browns book, then valentine low book, then for sure Tom Bower’s book, then Netflix canceling the children’s division, then Spotify delays, then Meghan McCain and Megyn Kelly’s insults, then whoppie saying something about archetypes, then you gov polls, then Donald trump, etc etc you all get the point.
      As Michelle Williams sings..”when Jesus says yes no body can say no!!”

      Imagine year and years of negative headlines, false accusations, death threats and you are still succeeding. Phew! I wouldn’t wanna mess with Harry and Meghan because the ancestors are really watching their backs.
      Every hater eventually pays the price.

  39. TheWigletOfWails says:

    This is so embarrassing for that dumpster fire of a island. Two things here, first, a lot worse has been written and said about them, things that could potentially cause them and their family major harm and they ignored it. They only ever sue (AND WIN) when the law has been broken and nothing of the sort happened here. It’s might be tasteless and racist but that’s practically the British media coverage of them 24/7, 365 so they’re used to it. Two, how many times does this need to be reiterated? They are PRIVATE citizens, not government officials or political candidates. Popularity polls and approval ratings of them mean nothing here. They could be hated more than Hitler and it wouldn’t matter. All they need is the love of their family and friends and they’re good. Their business partners still support them, the checks are still clearing and Archewell is going from strength to strength. As someone once said to me, “you’re only a topic of conversation if you’re at the top”. Keep going H&M and please continue to starve them-keep working behind the scenes until the invictus games come around.

    • Merv says:

      I hadn’t caught it before because I refuse to click on the link to this article. But I found her on Twitter and she’s the same woman that wrote another horrible article smearing Meghan in Oct of last year. She mainly quoted tom bower and Perez Hilton. She also at that time said that Harry and Meghan were being blacklisted from Hollywood and how Hollywood is all Meghan craved. That no one was inviting them anywhere which we know is a lie! They used the Obama wedding as the main example. Wow!!

      And this was when Archytypes was out with Mariah, Serena and was No 1.
      This lady is a hater and has no sources.

      • TheWigletOfWails says:

        It’s always funny to me when they say Hollywood is what Meghan craved. Meghan was already in Hollywood (and successful) but she chose to date and marry someone from a family who has no influence there? Whose member previously tried to make it there and failed? Meghan could have dated or married any bigwig director or producer but she shunned that for invasion of privacy and non-stop media harassment? Yeah right.

  40. Aviv says:

    Public figures are targets for satire.

  41. Saucy&Sassy says:

    The Spectator would do better to report about what’s going on right under their nose. Why don’t they report the facts and add facts about how that came about. I bet that would sell papers. Is there anyone there who has enough integrity to do that? Or does the government (Tories) control them.

  42. SenseOfTheAbsurd says:

    LOL, they haven’t said a single word about South Park, and I doubt they’ve watched it, it’s been unwatchable for about 20 years. I haven’t watched it either, but from what I’ve heard, it could just as easily be interpreted as satirising the ridiculous lies and hysteria of the British media.

  43. Well Wisher says:

    It is a simple explanation for this utter nonsense, the Sussexes understand how sarire works, and can make a distinction between that and plain old pettiness snd spite.
    The later is a description of the Spectator and its 👉 winged comrades.

    Maybe the Sussexes did not care enough to watch the show nor comment .

  44. Trix says:

    this chick writes the cattiest, most snide content about them, with blatant and obvious lies throughout. she’s not even good at spewing bullshit and making up quotes.

  45. Robin Samuels says:

    I never watched South Park. The art of animation was created for entertainment. Then adults came along and used it to insult other adults, such as in shows like South Park and The Simpsons. Remember Gary Janetti and how he used Prince George on his Instagram account to make unkind remarks about Meghan and to promote the moon bump conspiracy? I was saddened to see certain people I respected following him and liking his post; Soledad O’Brien was one. He eventually got a contract with HBO, but that didn’t last long. I don’t know how long the South Park episode can entertain the British media, but I hope they’re prepared for the next episode, which will not be about Harry and Meghan. All this South Park chatter distracts from what’s happening behind the palace walls. They announced Camilla has Covid and not another word.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Robin Samuels, I never watched South Park or The Simpsons for the same reason as you. I know they were popular, but neither appealed to me.

      If they’re getting their information about how Meghan is feeling from a psychic? They need to get a better one. I doubt Meghan, if she knows about it, gives it a thought. If she does, it’s probably about the fact that SP thought they were ‘important’ enough to do some satire about them.

      I think the bm should be paying more attention to the fact that SP was twitting them. I haven’t seen it but from what I’ve read the satire is composed entirely of the bm madness.

    • C says:

      The Simpsons, back when it was worth watching, had missteps but was never ever like South Park.

  46. Tessa says:

    As if she would tell this to the daily fail

  47. Kathryn says:

    The British tabloids are bonkers, but very many American media outlets also go after them, not just right wing media, either. New York Times, etc

    • Julia says:

      New York Times do not go after them. On the rare occasion they are mentioned it is generally neutral. There have been a few negative opinion pieces but that’s the same for all famous cultural figures. American media doesn’t have a weird obsession with them like the British media does.

  48. South Park has lost its significance a long time ago. They need to do something about their irrelevance. Meghan and Harry are their answered prayer. Now the show is being talked and written about. Good or bad publicity is still publicity. That’s the power of Harry and Meghan that no other royal can match.

  49. Lizzbert says:

    Sure, Jan. 👀

  50. Annalise/Typical Virgo says:

    @Cheche- I never said that I thought Meghan ENJOYS watching South Park, or that she’s a fan. I said that I would bet she has SEEN it. which in NO WAY implies that I think she is a regular viewer. but do I think that, in the 26 YEARS it’s been on, that she might have caught a random episode, sometime, somewhere, YES! Maybe at a friend’s house, it was on, maybe in a bar it was on (back in the early aughts I used to bartend and every Wed night, we turned the TVs onto South Park), frankly, for someone in this country to have NEVER ONCE seen South Park, I think you would have to be ACTIVELY avoiding it this WHOLE time! Which is fine! That’s your right! But I think it is quite the stretch to assume that Meghan has been ACTIVELY avoiding South Park for the last 26 years. It’s been a part of pop culture for literal decades now and I do not think I’m being presumptuous by stating that I think Meghan is well aware of the show has seen at LEAST once episode.

  51. Barbara says:

    Salty Island is really sinking LOL

  52. HarryforLife says:

    Not sure why it didn’t post earlier (unless maybe it’s being deemed threadjacking and there’s a planned separate post – my bad then if so!) but there’s an article in People M. that a rep for them responded to this.

  53. aquarius64 says:

    The Sussexes put out a statement through their spokesperson they are not suing South Park. I wish they didn’t bother but I guess they don’t want the image of suing people willy nilly.

    • HarryforLife says:

      Agreed, would have made me so much happier for the “we’re above this” silence but at least they are clarifying “sources” don’t speak for them. I think the “privacy” thing may be a trigger point for them because it keeps getting distorted as something they asked for when all this garbage happened to them instead while trying to serve publicly.

      • Emily says:

        I’m glad they put the statement out because that story about suing was starting to get out of control. American outlets were picking it up and people were becoming outraged that they were going to sue South Park. At least they put the statement out through American outlets so the British press had to get their stories second hand.

  54. blunt talker says:

    I still have trouble understanding the term privacy as it relates to the Sussexes-I view privacy as follows-don’t intrude upon my property without their permission-don’t peek in my windows without our persmission-don’t take or publish pics of our children without our permission-if we step into the public eye we do understand being dissected by all forms of media with pics and commentary-just don’t invade our living space without our permission period. anyother celeb or well-known person feels the same.

  55. MikeB says:

    The Spectator used to be a serious publication, however its market share must be down if they have now sunk to the level of the tabloids. The article is full of the same nonsense as the tabloids, such as “California sources” (California is a big state, where exactly are these sources located?’. It repeats “rumours” about H&M “taking it out of each other”. It sinks into childishness as it talks about South Park “giving them enough fodder for books, documentaries and podcasts” in the future. It takes a knock at Archewell. The Spectator has realized that the only way to increase readership is to attack H&M, this is the second one within a couple of weeks.

  56. Lilley says:

    Of course that she’s upset. She’s already told us that she was suicidal because of negative press about her.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Hey @Lilley, if you could share the link to Meghan saying it was the negative press about her that made her have suicidal ideations that would be great. You know, instead of a smear campaign against her from within the palace walls.

  57. Mel says:

    waaaa….we want our privacy!!!
    Finally,,,getting what they deserve,,,
    lies and hateful plots,,,are always** exposed in the end… 😉