It’s fascinating to watch as the royal/media machinery continues to churn out an entirely rewritten and reimagined narrative about Queen (Consort) Camilla ahead of her coronation. For all of the coronation-planning shambles, there is one constant thing: the palace is spending a lot of time and money emphasizing “Queen Camilla, crowned alongside her husband” and “Camilla’s victory lap, at long last.” It’s coming across as very smug, and I would assume it’s turning off more people than it’s winning over. It just shows you (again) Charles and Camilla’s inability to read the room, and their decades-long failure to understand that their support is a mile wide and an inch deep. People Magazine has now gotten into the business of embiggening Camilla, and they’re running some exclusives from Camilla biographers and Ingrid Seward. Some highlights:
How Harry & William feel about seeing Camilla crowned: “They are likely feeling a little wobbly about it,” royal author Ingrid Seward tells PEOPLE exclusively in this week’s issue. “I think a lot of people will feel the same.” Palace sources always insisted that Prince William, 41, and Prince Harry, 38, who grew up with the knowledge of their father’s affair with Camilla, were welcoming to their stepmother. A family friend says “there wasn’t any animosity,” and Prince Harry voiced support for Camilla in 2005, saying that he and William “love her to bits” and that she was “not the wicked stepmother.”
Harry’s complaints of Camilla leaking sh-t about him: “He was justified in his complaint that he and William were used in the early days to legitimize the partnership of Charles and [Camilla],” royal biographer and A Greater Love author Christopher Wilson tells PEOPLE. “Over time, she’s learned to roll with the punches. Harry’s feelings have been well-known to her over many years. Her reaction to Harry’s comments would be limited to a sad shake of the head.”
Camilla is “prepared”: “She has done a lot to show she is prepared for it and has a right to be in the modern world,” biographer Sally Bedell Smith tells PEOPLE. “And there has never been any doubt that Charles wants her there as Queen.” Seward adds, “William is quite calm about it. But it will stick in Harry’s throat a bit.”
Camilla’s “who me?” moment: “Considering that for most of her life she’d never contemplated the idea of becoming Queen, she’s doing incredibly well,” Wilson tells PEOPLE. “It’s a hell of a challenge being permanently in the spotlight at this age, but she’s tough and can take it.”
Steely Camilla: “She is quite steely,” a source close to the royal household tells PEOPLE in this week’s issue. “She went through a lot to be by his side.”
Teamwork: “They work well as a team. It’s impressive,” Wilson tells PEOPLE of Charles and Camilla. “Her presence reassures him. Despite all the trappings of majesty, it’s cold and lonely at the top, and it’s easy to see the comfort she provides him.”
“William is quite calm about it. But it will stick in Harry’s throat a bit.” I have my doubts, obviously. Weeks ago, when Camilla’s “victory lap” coronation plans started getting a lot of attention, some sources indicated that William wasn’t pleased that the Chubbly was turning into such a heavily Parker-Bowles event. The optics of Charles making a point of not including all of his grandchildren but Camilla including all of her grandchildren… it’s bad, y’all. A lot of people over 40 will be thinking about Diana and what could have been, which is basically the story of Camilla’s life. But yes, she was quite “steely” in the way she got everything she wanted, regardless of how many bodies she walked over.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.
-
- HRH Duchess of Cornwall hosting a reception for the British Equestrian teams from 2020 Tokyo Olympic & Paralympic Games.,Image: 660835221, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Steve Reigate / Avalon
-
- LONDON, ENGLAND – NOVEMBER 22: Camilla, Queen Consort during the State Banquet at Buckingham Palace on November 22, 2022 in London, England. This is the first state visit hosted by the UK with King Charles III as monarch, and the first state visit here by a South African leader since 2010.,Image: 739545057, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR 48 HOURS- Fee Payable Upon reproduction – For queries contact Avalon sales@Avalon.red London +44 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles +1 310 822 0419 Berlin +49 30 76 212 251 Madrid +34 91 533 42 89, Model Release: no, Credit line: Avalon.red / Avalon
-
- LONDON, ENGLAND – NOVEMBER 22: (L-R) King Charles III and Camilla, Queen Consort during the State Banquet at Buckingham Palace on November 22, 2022 in London, England. This is the first state visit hosted by the UK with King Charles III as monarch, and the first state visit here by a South African leader since 2010.,Image: 739545375, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR 48 HOURS- Fee Payable Upon reproduction – For queries contact Avalon sales@Avalon.red London +44 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles +1 310 822 0419 Berlin +49 30 76 212 251 Madrid +34 91 533 42 89, Model Release: no, Credit line: Avalon.red / Avalon
-
- Britain’s Queen Camilla reacts as she and King Charles visit Colchester Castle in Colchester, Britain, March 7, 2023. REUTERS/Chris,Image: 761001097, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: CHRIS RADBURN / Avalon
-
- King Charles III and Camilla The Queen Consort attend a Commonwealth Day Service at Westminster Abbey, London, England, UK on Monday 13 March, 2023.,Image: 762484395, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Justin Ng / Avalon
-
- Berlin, GERMANY – King Charles III and Queen Consort Camilla, with Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Elke Büdenbender during Welcome at the State Banquet at Bellevue Palace in Berlin, on the first state visit as King and Queen Consort to Germany. Pictured: Queen Consort Camilla BACKGRID USA 29 MARCH 2023 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
-
- Camilla Duchess of Cornwall at The Oldie Luncheon, in celebration of her 75th Birthday at National Liberal Club. Featuring: Camilla Duchess of Cornwall Where: London, England, United Kingdom When: 12 Jul 2022 Credit: Chris Jackson/PA Images/INSTARimages.com/Cover Images **North America Rights Only**
-
- King Charles III and Camilla Queen Consort attend a reception to thank the community of Aberdeenshire for their organisation and support following the death of Queen Elizabeth II at Station Square, the Victoria & Albert Halls, Ballater. Featuring: Camilla Queen Consort Where: Aberdeenshire, Scotland, United Kingdom When: 11 Oct 2022 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com/Cover Images **North America Rights Only**
-
- Diplomatic Corps Reception At Buckingham Palace Featuring: Camilla Queen Consort Where: London, England, United Kingdom When: 06 Dec 2022 Credit: Victoria Jones/PA Images/INSTARimages.com/Cover Images **North America Rights Only**
-
- Royals Attend Christmas Day Service At St Mary Magdalene Church In Sandringham Featuring: Camilla Queen Consort Where: Norfolk, England, United Kingdom When: 25 Dec 2022 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com/Cover Images **North America Rights Only**
-
- Commonwealth Day Service At Westminster Abbey Featuring: King Charles III, Camilla, Queen Consort, Prince William, Catherine, Princess of Wales, Prince Edward, Sophie Wessex Where: London, United Kingdom When: 13 Mar 2023 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
-
- Commonwealth Day Service At Westminster Abbey Featuring: King Charles III, Camilla, Queen Consort, Prince William, Catherine, Princess of Wales Where: London, United Kingdom When: 13 Mar 2023 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
I bet the one feeling the most “wobbly” on Boranation Day is Camilla herself.
For my part, I will just feel a bit ill. Not that I’ll be watching, but the thought of it is enough.
Hahahaha, Kaiser, your choice of pictures of this woman always tickles my funny bone. I wonder how she feels having been dragged through all she has been for the sake of this purported “prize”!!! As they said…it’s cold and lonely at the top! Couldn’t happen to a nicer person. I like to think that somewhere Diana is enjoying the schadenfreude! What do they say about sometimes getting what you want is the worst thing that could happen to you. KARMA.
Ha!! “Boranation” is classic – I LOL’d
Show, don’t tell — when the biographer says that Cami has “done a lot to show she is prepared for it” what exactly does she mean? Did she have any examples at all? She had an affair. She has no problem raiding the ill-gotten gain to wear some tacky baubles. What exactly else? She seems to do nothing whatsoever except booze with her creepy tabloid friends who have sick fantasies.
Bore-A-Nation FTW!
Ingrid Seward’s still trotting out that old and debunked talking point about Harry’s 2005 comments. We now know how he really feels about Camilla and when he made those comments he was just toeing the Palace line.
And last time I checked, minds and circumstances can change in 18 years.
According to Harry his mind never changed about Camilla. He always viewed her with suspicion and mistrust.
Of course he did. Both of them are highly suspicious. I’d want to Vommit
How did Chuckles the clown 🤡 turn into such a synchophant? I men being a slut is one thing but she can’t be all that good in bed to kick your children off to the curb ?
Right! We now know he said what he was told to say. Even from Spare, it sounds like he was okay-ish with her at the time, but did not want her to marry Charles (and neither did William!) and as the Camilla PR push went on (and continues to this day) at his expense, it really sounds like there is zero love lost there.
The description in Spare of Meghan meeting C&C and how she was able to chatter away with both of them and Harry just sat in awkward silence with Camilla…..yeah, zero love lost. and imagine the same is true for William.
Everybody gonna be wubbly at the chubbly
🫨😵💫🥴🤢🤮
@brassyrebel, thank you lovey, as I said to jaded, I’ve accepted that it’s terminal, but at least I’m at home, and I will continue to raise hell with the munster family and “the scrotum in a wig”, for as long as I can, and even on my bad days, I will content myself with enjoying the posts of all you celeb gang x
Here’s to many more years fighting the good fight, my friend! 🥂 Sending you love across the pond.😘
@Mary Pester — I and other CBers will be in your corner fighting against this appalling family and institution! Big hugs from Vancouver Island!
“A sad shake of the head” should be the motto of this family as well as the coronation. I was 13 when Diana died and I wasn’t what you would call a royal watcher at that age. I was busy with puberty. But it was such a massive deal and people just could not fathom what would happen if Chuck became King. Nobody cared because everyone assumed his mother would go on for decades, as she did. I very distinctly remember that. But if you told my 13 year old self what’s happening and how Camilla is in a position to just “sadly” shake her head, that kid would explode.
Wobbly as in “sea-sick”? Yeah, I imagine a lot of people will feel that.
I mean, like, nobody except for her toadies and cronies in the press, whom she hires and briefs, befriends, and probably beds when necessary, are happy about her being crowned queen consort. NO ONE alive in Diana’s day sees this positively, and their kids are learning just how sh*tty the whole thing is as well. Partly why kids don’t support the monarchy in the slightest and will do away with it once they inherit this dying Earth.
The people who feel “wobbly” about Cam being crowned should be feeling the exact same way about KC. Funny how it is acceptable for KC to need Cam’s support, but not for Meghan to be PH’s support. “She has done a lot to show she is prepared for it and has a right to be in the modern world.” Yeah, what exactly has she done?
I guess the “modern” part is being the side piece queen? Modern means her place is right beside the Horn Toad King.
@equality, no, not a BIT wobbly, but feeling asif we are in a row boat in the middle of a force 10!!
And STEELY, yep she is steely, she stole Diana’s husband, she stole the throne, she stole (abeted by the gutless git she married) the title of Queen, which was against our ACTUAL Queen’s wishes, and steely enough along with her brass neck, to hold up bloomin Tower Bridge.
Hoping everything went well yesterday, Mary Pester! So good to have you back. I just want to say, “scrotum in a wig” about the subject of this post in your honor.
“gutless git” LOL, Mary Pester!
Camilla’s control of Charles may very well be what rids the world of the British monarchy….one can hope.
It’s time it all became a museum exhibition.
I find it ironic that they claim Meghan has too much influence over Harry all while saying how much Camilla has with Charles
The entire article is nauseating.
No breakfast for me now.
Wobbly, teary and nauseous for me. Like Annel, I won’t view it, but will know there is a tragedy happening overseas.
The consort to-be and Charles first met in 1967, at Winston Churchill’s funeral. Charles is rumored to have lost his virginity to the then sexually seasoned 17 year-old Camilla. In other words, she was his first and his endgame.
However, the Queen and the aristocratic circles all being aware of the consort-to-be’s reputation, everything was done to deter Charles from marrying that nimble courtesan, and a brand new narrative of their purported encounter was spread by the media.
Consort Camilla is from now on the face and beacon of the British monarchy, which is auspicious 😁.
I don’t buy her being his first. They are trying to spend it that she was his one true love. Thats not true. He didn’t even want to marry her. She didn’t want to marry him. She married and had 2 kids with the man she wanted.
Charles was introduced to Camilla by lucia Santa Cruz. Lucia was.his first lover
I just searched her name. Charles had that same proud look that harry had in the picture with his first. Lol.
Y’all should go look at Kay burleys tweet about Camilla and how she became “beloved Queen.”
https://twitter.com/KayBurley/status/1646440214238228481?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
The ratio there was tremendous. Almost 3.5k comments disputing Kay’s claim that Camilla is beloved and only a few hundred likes
They are accusing Kay burley of joining in on the royal propaganda machine. Ha
Ultimately Camilla got what she wanted at the expense of many lives and nothing we can do about it sadly. It’s like Murdoch destroying lives while he’s still living a long, wealthy, privileged life. Ugh sometimes life isn’t fair.
Camilla and “beloved” belong in the dictionary of antonyms.
Your last paragraph, I could not agree more.
No wonder Kate and cams have such a hard time looking, acting and being human. You would too if you had so much steel in you.
Agree with Kaiser’s doubts about William being calm. I just don’t know about that. Perhaps, he’s resigned at this point. Idk?
It’s a slap in the face everyday that William has to be bothered with Camilla. He was old enough to know everything. If William was truly evil something would’ve happened to Camilla ages ago. That goes for the Spencer’s as well.
Charles Spencer and Diana took great joy in enacting revenge on their stepmother Raine after their father’s death. If Camilla out lives Charles I do think William will make her pay.
The only people happy about seeing Camila crowned are Camila, Charles, her family members getting perks and kick backs from being royal adjacent and the tabloids she leaks to.
Everyone else is somewhere between apathetic and ready to vomit.
Everyone,everywhere,all at once!
Maybe ms burley should remember the article that was written, where camzilla was described as “a face like a bulldog eating a pee-stained nettle! That’s how she was and IS viewed by most of the people and the princess Royal (Anne) is very, very angry at her being given the title Queen!
I feel wobbly about Charles being crowned also.
Yep! I mean, I’m American. Who sits on the British throne doesn’t impact me. But for some reason there are Americans who still look up to or at least are fascinated by this family and system. The thought of them putting Chuck on a pedestal is just UGH.
I won’t be watching, but I will be thinking of Diana during the conanation. Also hoping Harry makes it home safe.
I don’t know about feeling wobbly, but I imagine I will feel waves of nausea & nostalgia for the days when Princess Diana was alive & well.
I think a huge (imo) point being overlooked in the stories of the coronation is that the Church of England was literally created to allow King Henry VIII to abandon his wife Catherine of Aragon and marry Ann Boleyn. The royal family and the Church of England then spent centuries after Henry VIII death to promote its legitimacy by preventing the royals from divorcing and remarrying in the Church of England. Centuries of propaganda for the CoE plus a huge deadly rift with Catholics to cement the validity of the CoE. With the coronation on May 6, the Archbishop will be anointing two people who were divorced and installing the King as the Head of the Church of England (like Henry VIII). How are members of the Church of England feeling about that?
Additionally, the king wants the coronation program to include all faiths, not just the Anglicans. Will there be readings or prayers from each faith – Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, etc. My experience at Anglican services is that they are monotonous. Including additional faiths in the program will add quite a bit of variety. How are members of the Church of England feeling about that? I recall seeing some people taken aback with the variety at Meghan’s wedding so I’m curious about how the program variety at the coronation will be received by them.
Were people taken aback by the variety upset at the disruption of a traditional Anglican service for actual religious reasons, or more for cultural and social ones? I’m not Anglican but I grew up in the Episcopal Church, which is the closest the US has to it. There are a lot of similarities. By the standards of American Protestant denominations , it’s not particularly dogmatic. No fire and brimstone but no jubilation, either. It is pretty staid and traditional in terms of the service, music, overall style, etc.
I think the people rolling their eyes at Harry and Meghan’s wedding were just being snobby about the display of emotion. They thought it was unseemly. They don’t give a fig about actually religious content.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11952937/Charles-odds-Church-England-role-faiths-play-Coronation.html
@mstj, this article appeared on DM Online a few days ago and then promptly disappeared. Apparently the church was taking issue with Charles’ wish for a diverse, faith-wise, Coronation. The Firm probably had it pulled from the front page but it will be interesting to see how this pans out.
Thanks Mary. Interesting. I wonder if the Church or the Palace called up the DM to have them pull it.
Diana won the media wars, despite her imperfections, exposed by her husband and his now wife.
What this new round of media blitz, it has become apparent that the criticisms leveled against the monarch and his wife by his former was spot on.
The ‘cat that got the cream’ approach that allows for a victory lap makes for discomfort among decent people who just want to mind their business.
His exclusion of his son to please all the people who want to use him, including his other son is appalling. If the right wing media was against the king, he would’ve been described as cruel and his wife as selfish and manipulative.
Diana was practically perfect compared to her ex and his second wife. Imo. She would have given harry and Meghan support and been their advocate.
“exposed by her husband and his now wife.” It is well documented the allegations against her but it did not stop the public sympathy. I just acknowledge that factor. it is not my personal opinion.
If “wobbly” is another way to say nauseous or sickened, I agree.
My husband and I were both divorced when we met. When I asked to get married in the local Anglican Church in a very tiny town in northern Canada, the English pastor would not do it. It had to be a civil ceremony and they would not perform it outside in nature either, because, something something, sinners, something something. My husband said the Cathedral of God is all of nature. We needed up being married in the forest by his best friend ( which you can legally do in small communities up North). But good to know the head of the church isn’t as sinful as I and can keep the pristine and oh so godly nature of the Anglicans intact. Phew!
Thanks for sharing. It’s why I think the coronation of Charles and Camilla should be generating more conversation from the perspective of the Church of England and what it purports to embody. However, the tabloids (propagandists) have focused on the family drama and the logistics instead.
My focus has also been on the various ways they have managed the propaganda spin for the event. The Sussex family distractions are beneficial to Charles and Camilla because literally the most important aspect of the coronation, what the Head of the Church of England should embody, is being overlooked (deliberately imo) in conversations.
After all, constitutionally Charles is already King and Head of state. The coronation is only needed for instate him as the religious leader, head of the Anglican Church – Church of England – and divine representative for God on earth.
Fascinating how highly two colluding individuals will be elevated for members of the church to revere. Royal propaganda is fascinating. It’s the reason why there has been a symbiotic relationship with the monarch (royal institution) and the media. The media is needed to maintain a mystique around the monarch as a divine individual and elevated institution (top of the pyramid). Charles and Camilla will need the propaganda machine to rewrite a lot of history for the monarchy to survive and pass to William.
This is such a great comment. It’s handy having a state religion: the religion serves the state, it’s never the other way around.
IIRC, the Parker-Bowleses married in the Roman Catholic church owing to his faith, not hers… and while they divorced it’s unknown if their (Catholic) marriage was annulled. Is the new Queen married to two men (at least in the eyes of that faith group)? I wonder how the Church of England will address this question, if it even is one?
I cannot fathom how it is that two such undeserving and basically immoral people will be worshipped as head of the Church of England. Fine examples of religious and moral pulchritude they are not. I don’t know if any propaganda machine is big or powerful enough to glow-up their tattered reputations. It’ll be a broken monarchy by the time William inherits it and he’ll drive what’s left of it into the ground.
@ Jaded: Funny how the Church of England owes its very existence to a divorce, isn’t it?
@kelleybelle — yup, the irony doesn’t escape me!
The Church of England was literally created for King Henry VIII to abandon his wife Catherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boleyn. The royal family and the Church of England then spent centuries after Henry VIII died to promote its legitimacy by disallowing the royals from divorcing and remarrying in the Church of England. Centuries of propaganda for the CoE plus a huge deadly rift with Catholics to cement the validity of the CoE. With the coronation on May 6, the Archbishop will be anointing two people who were divorced and installing the King as the Head of the Church of England (like Henry VIII).
How are members of the Church of England feeling about that? If they are fine with the coronation of Charles and Camilla then how does that align with not marrying divorcees as Louise highlighted. Will they lose members or will they allow divorcees to be married going forward and grow the membership? If they grow the membership Charles could be lauded for that accomplishment. As I said in my previous comment, there are some interesting conversations to be had regarding the Church of England and Charles’ coronation.
BTW Henry VIII married Anne Boleyn before his marriage to Catherine of Aragon was annulled, not annulled by the Catholic Church under which they were married, but annulled by his Archbishop of the newly created CoE. Considering that, was he really married to Anne? Was she an anointed Queen? Similar questions for Charles and Camilla’s marriage. As @Prairiegirl highlighted, Camilla was married in Catholic Church, was her marriage annulled by the Catholic Church? Interesting nuggets and questions about the religion of Anglican Church and marriages and coronations.
@Jaded the propaganda is working at the moment because it is creating a distraction from conversations about the Church of England and what Charles and Camilla’s coronation means for the Church of England. If the conversations on the morning shows veered in this direction then there will also be considerable talks about Princess Diana being wronged by both of them and the affair they had during Diana’s marriage. Charles and Camilla would not want their coronation to be overshadowed by memories of Diana’s suffering in her marriage.
The way the article openly admits that she threw Harry and William under the bus when she joined the family, then just tries to gloss over it with a “why aren’t they over it?” is wild
Wouldnt it be lovely if Diana could be present for the big day? I envision crowds of people wearing masks with Diana’s Visage complete with a tiara. A lá V is for Vendetta. I will just leave this here and back away slowly. Hopefully, the internet can make this happen.
I had a very similar thought, N. I imagined someone had gone around to parts of the crowd and handed out large pictures of Diana to hold up when they roll by. How about Not my Queen signs w Diana photo on otherside? Heehee, may 6 sounds like a good day to post a few of our favorite Diana pictures online… signs don’t have to just be in person anymore!
I 💯 remember the days of “lets skip Chuck and his horse-ho and make Wills king”. I’ll bet William remembers too, another reason he’s angry all the time. Camilla was big time persona non-grata , at least in the States. It’s extremely galling she’s going to get the crown she’s schemed for.
The Squad on Twitter has been promoting the idea of everyone changing their social media profile pictures to ones of Diana for the coronation. Beginning on Monday of coronation week, I plan to do exactly that. I have a zillion pictures of her, so I can rotate through them quite a bit.
When Queen Elizabeth upgraded Camilla’s rank from Princess Consort to Queen Consort, most people don’t realise the consequence of this huge and momentous move.
A Princess Consort cannot be crowned at the coronation but a Queen Consort can be crowned alongside the King and anionted with holy oil.
Elizabeth solid out her faith to help Andrew. I think that help killed her.
Wobbly indeed 🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢
Charles is going to go down as a very short length term and unpopular. Camilla and his cheating scandal was just so ..so, tackey! It caused problems that Harry and William suffer from, their anger, the impact on Diana who then tried her best with her sons while dealing with Charles, must have made Diana so unhappy and angry with that being absorbed by his sons. They are two vert selfish people.
Instead of him admitting he made a mistake he keeps doubling down on it. Like one if his friends said, he is stuck with Camilla because he publicly named her. Chuck has spent to much time on this. Someone shouldve told him to be single for awhile. Now his coronation is in shambles.
Camzilla will be the one feeling wobbly at the clowning because she’s had 3 or 4 G&Ts to steady her nerves.
I mean, everyone has to be thinking about Charles’ tampon comments at the Struggly, right? I will never get over the utter grossness of that conversation.
It is my hope that Diana’s soul has traveled to a place of peace, especially as peace was denied to her in life.
But it is my vengeful wish that Diana is able to traverse the divide and that the moment that Cams is crowned that it all begin to end for her.
Let them have their dragons.
Wobbly? Try incensed or disgusted. Can’t believe Harry is going to watch this insult to his mother.
I just realized that the bright-ish shade of blue Camilla wears so often is ‘royal blue’ (although it SHOULD be called ‘stewardess blue’).
I wonder if that’s why she wears it so much. She’s trying to send subliminal messages to the people of the UK and/or influence how they view her……..
Yes i agree Virgo;
i have been noticing the rottweiler hi-jacking the blue colors ever since she chose to wear the blue sapphire parure as the “first” time wearing any of THe Queens “evening” jewels/tiara set!!!
I now believe after seeing all the crazy bulldump they have pulled on people including Meghan and Harry.. that they are utilizing some sort of ‘psyops . IOW i think they are being counseled on this type of non verbal communications. different combinations of coincedences that then associate them with other people or good people with bad people..
like Why pick Archies birthday for the Coronoation when england already have 2 other bank holidays in May?
and why did Camilla choose the Blue parure since blue color and sapphire gems was hugely associated withPrincess Diana in peoples minds . not just her blue engagement ring (now Khates!) but that huge broach/ now necklace from the queen mother and all the saudi saphries parures/pieces they gave diana.
-and now some already assocated with kate.
the upper class twits seem to be using some sort of psychology always combining people ideas visuals.. (like always treating Harry as if he is like Andrew) . weird.
also i can’t forget that The Rottweiler wore a Stick Insect diamond broach the day after (or so) the queen died .worn to a church service?) weird
i don’t care if it was from her father.. it was inappropriate broach to wear to a function honoring the queen who died the day/s before –and NO one commented on it except to repatedly say Rotty’s father gave it to her. –OFCOURSe it was some sort of statement about they queen by camilla. how could it not be? the woman has a pants load of diamong broaches to choose from,.
I thought it was royal blue and she wore it to try to move the needle. I thought it was too show she is a blue blood. but the press said they wear it to show honesty and it matches her features. They convinced me but I think the first answer is right. Anyway, Camilla should’ve done more to erase her bad reputation. She needed to create a Camilla trust that mimic the prince’s trust.
Diana still has the last laugh. When Cowmilla dies her connection to the monarchy dies with her. She will never have a descendant that will inherit the throne
Diana’s DNA will flow through the BRF long after we are all gone because both her boys had at least one daughter, And as long as there is at least one direct female descendant she will be there through her DNA.
Cowmilla will always be the concubine who ruled a weak willed king, nothing more.
I like this comment. Camilla is sitting high and mighty now, but it ends with her. There’s a certain cosmic beauty to that thought .
@Edna x mode- Your comment is very interesting and I think you’re 100% correct!
I too have noticed the absolutely vulgar overuse of jewelry (particularly pieces associated w/the late Queen) and I think you’re absolutely correct that the aristos are SUPER into giving visual messages (ex- seating Harry next to Andrew, message is “these two are the same!!!”) as well as using visual cues to nudge people in certain directions and influence them (Camilla CONSTANTLY wearing “royal” blue, blue is also the color of loyalty, so Camilla is trying to send the message that she’s royal and loyal. And that rhymes! 😁)
And how rich is it that the royal women have been dripping in Saudi gems, after manufacturing that scandal about Meghan wearing the Saudi earrings??
I don’t think William is calm about it. I think he is biding his time. Once he gets the keys to the kingdom, I fully expect Queen Camilla to be kicked to the kerb.