Kevin Costner needs to ‘approve’ of items Christine Baumgartner removes from his home

Two weeks ago, the judge ordered Christine Baumgartner to vacate Kevin Costner’s Carpinteria mansion. The same mansion where she’s lived and raised their children for the past nineteen years. Last week, the same judge set a temporary child support number too – Costner will have to pay $129K a month to Christine in child support. The divorce bickering is far from over, and Christine still plans to contest the prenup. I thought this whole divorce would be slow-going and methodical, so I’ve been shocked by how quickly the judge in this case has taken Costner’s side. It’s bonkers to me that Christine apparently has to be out of the house by the end of this month. It’s even crazier that the judge ordered Christine to not remove any furniture or anything beyond her clothes & jewelry from the home, at least not without getting Costner’s permission first. YIKES.

Kevin Costner claims estranged wife Christine was calculating an exit plan in their marriage months before their separation. In a new court filing obtained by PEOPLE amid the ongoing divorce, Costner, 68, and his legal team write that Christine, 49, has allegedly “been taking cash advances” on “credit cards, issued not to her but to staff members” without his knowledge or consent. Additionally, Costner claims a car purchase Christine made prior to their separation could indicate she was thinking ahead to an eventual split.

“Months before separation, although the parties had always leased their automobiles, without [Costner’s] knowledge or consent, [Christine] bought an expensive vehicle for her personal use (probably because the [prenuptial agreement] allows her to take that vehicle with her),” the documents read. “Thus, it appears that [Christine] had been planning her exit long before she told [Costner] in April 2023.”

The filing also claims Christine “has shown a disturbing propensity in the last several months, both before and after separation, to take Respondent’s property without his knowledge or consent, especially since this case was filed.”

In her own response to Costner’s filing, Christine said Costner’s “request includes a myriad of false statements that are no doubt included to play to the press and ‘smear’ me in the media. I will not address each one.”

As she prepares to move out, the latest filings show Costner is concerned about what items from the home Christine will take with her, down to who gets what silverware, kitchen items and electronics. In documents filed by Kevin’s lawyers, the actor asked the court to “prevent [Christine] from removing [Kevin’s] separate property from his home, and to insure an orderly process for the removal of her separate property (if any).” He alleged that under the terms of the premarital agreement they signed before marrying in 2004 there is “no community property.”

Christine wrote in her response, “With the exception of my clothing, jewelry, toiletries and handbags, Kevin wants to have the final say as to whether I can remove my personal items from the house or my storage unit. For example, under Kevin’s proposed order, I could not remove my mother’s childhood dresser without first meeting and conferring, and then obtaining his approval. Nothing in Kevin’s proposed order precludes Kevin from simply withholding his consent or acting arbitrarily.”

The judge, however, granted Costner’s request for a motion that would block Christine, 49, from removing certain items from the home. “Christine shall be permitted to remove her toiletries, clothing, handbags and jewelry,” according to the Friday order. She is prohibited, however, from taking “any other items of property including, but not limited to, furniture, furnishings, appliances, and artwork.”

[From People]

Christine is getting hosed in this divorce and it’s shocking. I hope she was planning for this and getting some cash squirreled away – the way Costner is treating her now is so controlling and vindictive, it would not shock me at all if Christine was being financially abused throughout their marriage. How many times did he hold that prenup over her head during their marriage? How many times did he tell her that she would be left with nothing if she ever left? This man is worth tens of millions of dollars and he’s complaining that his wife bought a car which she will “get” in the divorce? She’s the mother of three of your children!! Jesus H.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

74 Responses to “Kevin Costner needs to ‘approve’ of items Christine Baumgartner removes from his home”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MrsBanjo says:

    Gawd he’s disgusting.

    • B says:

      Frankly, this is not a good look for his legal team either. Decimating the other parent of your still minor children should be something she counsels against.

    • Sugarhere says:

      Can someone enlighten me as to why they are divorcing at all?

      • H says:

        He’s a lying cheater who cheats? Plus, a horrible controlling person who won’t let her take silverware so their kids can eat off it?

      • paintergal says:

        She wanted him home more, he wanted to work all of the time.

      • Sugarhere says:

        @H, @Paintergal: Thank you, now we know 🤦‍♀️.

      • Jenn says:

        These proceedings make me believe that “financial abuse,” “controlling behavior,” and “paranoia” were the cause

  2. Ameerah M says:

    He’s a POS. Which I already knew but his behavior towards the mother of his three kids is just reaffirming that.

    • B says:

      Idk about the wanting him home more part.
      This is the kind of guy I would want away on business trips as much as possible.
      New project in New Zealand? Check.

  3. Oh_Hey says:

    This judge is giving me Judge Oderkirk (the BP/AJ judge vibes). I get ordering two divorcing parties not to mutually loot the place but what if Costner makes her leave behind stuff that she verifiably bought with her income? That order is rife for abuse and essentially ensures that his wife moves into an empty home with their minor kids.

    I hope she’s getting good legal advice and that this is fuel for some bigger fire.

    • hexcellent says:

      I don’t remember if I read it here or at ONTD, but somewhere I read a comment that this judge is pushing 90 (!) years old, and has a long-standing tendency to favor male spouses in divorce cases. She has a long road ahead of her.

    • Annie says:

      She never had her own income. He kept her for years while dating so she could travel with him. She was foolish never developing a career after college. No, not modeling. A solid career path. She seems so scared now of being poor.

  4. Another Putz. He is absolutely vindictive. How dare she leave ME! I’ll show her!!

    • Sarah says:

      C’mon. That is basically the throw pillow embroidery for every divorce, esp for the party being left. He’s being as vindictive as anyone would be in this sitch.

      • MrsBanjo says:

        Oh please. He’s absolutely not being the way “anyone” would be in a divorce. Stop that nonsense. He’s being vindictive and financially abusive and he has an ancient judge to back him up.

      • Jaded says:

        Not all people go through contentious divorces. When Mr. Jaded divorced he told his ex she could take whatever she wanted. Of course she took all the good stuff, but it didn’t matter, the marriage had been a dumpster fire for ages. Costner’s always been a mean, cheap, philandering a-hole.

      • McGee says:

        Yikes, Sarah.

  5. Concern Fae says:

    Is this something that will backfire somewhere in the appeals? Because it seems truly egregious. She truly has no share of the income earned during the marriage where she was a full time homemaker. It even looks as though her unsuccessful businesses are being held against her.

  6. Seraphina says:

    I have been keeping up with this story due to the absurd pettiness on Costner’s part (Kevin). He is petty and a disgusting man to treat the mother of his children this way and his wife of close to 20 years. Shame on him.

  7. bluhare says:

    Christine Baumgartner had a terrible lawyer who allowed her to sign a prenup that didn’t have provisions after x years of marriage, and didn’t give her any cash based on how many years they’ve been married, etc. If you’ll notice some celebrities get divorced prior to 10 years due to a sunset clause or something like that in their agreements. That’s on her and her lawyer at the time. She should be talking to him or her. I don’t know anything about prenups, but this one seems pretty tight and skewed to Costner.

    Costner, on the other hand, is being petty by enforcing it down to the last comma.

    • Lizzie Bathory says:

      She either picks bad lawyers or doesn’t listen if they tell her something she doesn’t want to hear. I wonder about the advice she got before filing. A guy like Costner was always going to enforce this prenup, especially once he was blindsided by her filing. I’m sort of surprised that she’s surprised.

      Were her lawyers unrealistic or did they warn her it would be an uphill battle & she just hoped the threat of bad publicity would get Kevin to give her more money?

      • Christa says:

        If she can’t get around the pre-nup, her best bet may be to make this as messy and ugly as she can and hope that he will cough up more money in exchange for her agreeing to some type of NDA.

    • Elizabeth Phillips says:

      Agreed. I don’t feel sorry for people who are stupid enough to sign awful prenups.

      • Whynot says:

        I don’t think that’s fair. If anything, it shows that she probably married him for love and not money. If Kevin cared about his children, he wouldn’t be so exceedingly selfish and stingy. This house to him is probably like $1000 is for most of us, and it was his children’s home. It’s a drop in the bucket for him financially, but the entire bucket for his wife and children.

      • McGee says:

        What if she did not have a legal advisor at the time the prenup was generated; or had representation suggested by a less-than-neutral party?

  8. HeyKay says:

    Kevin is damaging himself so FN much in his handling of this divorce.
    Idiot!
    I’ve said repeatedly….Shut up. Have the lawyers offer a lump sum, ($50M or so) pay every cost for the kids + Trust funds for each. She signs off on the 3 houses he bought before the prenup.
    Get it done as fast as possible.

    Every detail filed in court is public info.
    It all makes him look petty. She wants out. Pay up, finalize the divorce and move the F on.

    I can not believe that one of the lawyers can not get him to understand that he is burning down his reputation.
    Plus, he has the Horizon project coming and
    #1. Finalize the divorce so any profit is his alone.
    #2. The more of his messy private details that come out…he is losing his audience/profits.
    #3. How much FN money does a 68 y/o need?
    His current net worth is $250-$300M. Can not take it with you, Kevin.

    JMO, but he is not going to win anything by dragging it all out.
    Tell the lawyers write it up, get it done, he is only running up the cost of the lawyers on both sides.
    She has not worked/employed at a paying job in 20 years. He will pay for everything.
    I never thought he was this stupid. Stubborn, yes. Huge ego, yes. Control freak, oh yes.

    Btw, once Costner is divorced, the amount of women lining up to “console” him? Yup.
    Tom Brady and Kevin Costner, huge wealth, fame, tall, white men. They will still be considered a catch by plenty of people.

    • Eurydice says:

      Not sure what Tom Brady is doing in this conversation. His divorce was not contentious and he’s always been great about supporting his children.

  9. tealily says:

    What a stingy old as*hole he is.

  10. Meh says:

    The many details of this divorce indicate that, yes, Christine is being, and has been, financially abused by Kevin Costner. The fact that she put a car on an employee’s credit card, rather than had the money to spend on a car, or had her own car, makes it evident that she has been controlled completely — likely emotionally as well. I used to love his movies, but I will never again watch anything of his again. What a horrible, horrible man to not ensure that the mother of his children is taken care of, a woman who has devoted decades of her life to him. That is a man with no basic decency, a man who insists on total control. She will start over with an empty apartment so that Kevin can punish her for leaving. Kevin Costner is sickening.

    • NotTheOne says:

      There are so many red flags about this relationship. It sounds like he was going most of the year, for many, many years of the marriage, leaving her to take care of the kids/house/etc., without any real say in their lives. Almost like she was hired staff.

  11. girl_ninja says:

    He is truly nasty. What a horrible, petty and greedy man.

  12. Scout says:

    She agreed to a draconian financial agreement when they first married. But Costner is taking on far more damage by forcing her to comply with it when he has the funds to be more generous to the mother of three of his children.

  13. HeyKay says:

    Kevin has 3 grown kids from marriage #1., plus a grown son from his relationship with a Rooney of NFL fame, and now the 3 w/CB.

    I bet the 3 from first marriage have next to no involvement with any of the other kids.
    Seems the son w/Rooney has never had any involvement with any of the other kids.

    And the younger kids w/CB are also no involvement with any of the other kids.
    Which is all understandable, due to the huge age gaps of the CB kids.

    When Kevin passes, what a strange situation that will be at the services.
    The wealthy really are different from us.

    • Whynot says:

      Throw a bone to your partner of 20 years; the mother of your children. If he wasn’t such a greedy bastard and said, fine, even though it’s not in the prenup, you can keep the one home that you raised our children in, he would probably actually be getting good publicity for that right now, instead of this PR nightmare. People would still be shocked that the prenup is so stingy after 20 years of marriage to one of the wealthiest men in the world, but we would probably be singing his praises now if he let his wife and kids stay in the house they grew up in. It’s literally nothing to him financially, and his children, and the movie going public, wouldn’t be hating his vindictive ass right now.

      • Flower says:

        Also he could have EASILY allowed her to live in the house until the youngest reaches the age of majority or 21. That would have also given her 8 years to invest the lump sum and generate income for her future whilst she gets on her feet.

        It takes on average 5-8 years for single mothers to recover from the effects of a divorce.

        Imagine the stress the 13 year old is feeling right now.

        Also I seriously doubt KC was responsible for the final build and decoration of the house including supervising contractors. She should at least be paid for that enhancement to an asset which has appreciated value over the years.

  14. HeyKay says:

    CB made a mistake in not updating the finances in her favor after every child.
    Why on earth didn’t she have a brand new car paid for and in her name?
    Or maybe all the cars are leased?
    I don’t know.
    I was surprised to see that all 3 of those huge estates in Kevins name before their marriage apparently still have mortgages on them. In addition to the huge maintenance costs yearly.

    Rich folks handle money differently then working class folks.
    If I live long enough to pay off my mortgage on my house = happy days.

    I know I keep saying this but at 68, why is he wasting so much time and energy fighting every penny?
    Pay up and finalize the divorce.
    Most people as they reach his age want to simplify/downsize.

    Also CB should take out anything she had before the marriage that was hers, buy new everything else. Bad mojo in that house now, leave as much as you can. CB needs a totally new start.

    • MrsBanjo says:

      “Why on earth didn’t she have a brand new car paid for and in her name?”

      With what money? She stayed home and raised the kids. She didn’t have money to her name to do that. That’s why he’s able to pull this shit on her.

    • Josephine says:

      As to the car, it sounds like they always leased. It’s funny that she managed to buy a new car and he didn’t even notice until the scrutiny of the divorce.

      I completely get why she started to take some resources out of the joint household so that she would have something to fall back on when the ridiculous prenup came into play. But that never works because both sides demand audits these days. He has to prove that it was an attempt to take/hide money, though, and it’s really, really stupid that he’s even trying to do so. For the sake of the kids, give her money you will never, ever use in this lifetime and move on. It’s not about “losing” to her, it’s about doing what’s right by the kids. Men never get that.

    • Sandra says:

      Staff had more access to his money than she did, which is clearly by his design.

  15. k.tate says:

    she was and is being abused financially. they have been together 20 YEARS and she had to buy a car on the down low? she knew what she would be up against and she tried to set it up so that she and their kids wouldn’t starve or be homeless while the divorce was raging on and i am familiar with that mindset.

  16. Millennial says:

    She can’t even bring plates and silverware for her kids to eat on or beds for them to sleep in. Wild. And it’s not like he even lives at that house very much with his shooting schedule. Let’s be real, those kids will be living with her. Give them beds and plates, Kevin!!

  17. LaDeeDah says:

    I suspect the majority of Costner fans in 2023 are really just fans of Yellowstone. I also strongly expect that the large base of Yellowstone fans lean heavily to the right. Within that group, Costner is probably a hero for trying to destroy the woman who dared to leave him. All of his obscenely wealthy, senior citizen, white male fans are cheering him on and taking notes. It’s disgusting.

    • Whynot says:

      Sadly, this is so true. I think Kevin will lose a large amount of female fans but rich, white dudes are likely cheering him on.

  18. HeyKay says:

    I think the kids stuff and the kids themselves are going to using that house as their primary residence.
    Kevin has said the kids and all their stuff will stay in that house, same school, etc.

    I don’t know why CB doesn’t take her stuff, move into the nearest upscale hotel and tell the lawyers Nail it down and finalize it.

    No way Kevin going to control it. He just keeps digging in.
    We all know he will end up paying millions and millions, he is the only income in that family.

    • Flower says:

      “In a new court filing obtained by PEOPLE amid the ongoing divorce, Costner, 68, and his legal team write that Christine, 49, has allegedly “been taking cash advances” on “credit cards, issued not to her but to staff members” without his knowledge or consent. Additionally, Costner claims a car purchase Christine made prior to their separation could indicate she was thinking ahead to an eventual split.”

      ^^ This is what really irks him, that she eventually had the audacity to leave him.

      He created a situation where she was ENTIRELY financially dependent on him and she just had to put up or shut up.

      I think she realised that she had to make moves whilst he was busy with YellowStone. Men like this do not have an ‘off switch’, he will continue abusing her from afar for humiliating him.

      He will also just go out there and get a copy paste younger wife whom he can abuse. Men like this never learn so eventually she will have the last laugh.

  19. HeyKay says:

    Oh Kevin is going to lose a big portion of his fan base with these details coming out.
    Lots of those good old boys and gals who love Yellowstone are also huge believers that you do not treat the Mother of your children this way. No respect to Mom? Not a good man.
    A man pays his bills, treats women with respect, always looks out for their kids. Is still a very big way of life.

    And lots of us are also pissed that Yellowstone went to crap and will now end badly.
    S1-3 were good, beautiful scenery.

  20. Mel says:

    People, I’m sorry but she signed the pre-nup,she’s getting screwed but SHE SIGNED IT! Typically thinking like the second wife that somehow she is “special” and this person would always treat them as such. Well, the answer to that is ” no”, especially if spouse got burned in the first divorce. If he purchased a rocking chair before they got married and it’s in the house, no, she doesn’t get to take it with out clearing it with him first. It’s like if I decided to get divorced and then tried to pack up and move with my MIL’s dining set without a discussion or my husband tried to leave with my piano without one. This is a molehill that everyone wants to make into a mountain. Would you let your spouse just pack up your stuff without a discussion if they were leaving, no you would not.

    • ME says:

      Yeah she agreed to the terms of the pre-nup. Now she has to live by those terms. Also, I hate how people act like having 3 kids with him entitles her to anything. Was having those children a job? A job she should be compensated for? The children are the reward. She had kids because she wanted to have kids, not because she should be paid for popping them out. He should pay child support, which he is, because the children should be taken care of. Anything he owned before the marriage is his. Also, did she not work when they got married? She was almost 30. Did she not bring any money of her own into the marriage?

      • Kate says:

        Yes, having those three kids and being a full time care taker is a job. It is literally full time unpaid and unvalued labor. It was due to her unpaid and unvalued labor that he has was able to continue to have the career and build the wealth that he now has, so also yes, that entitles her to some of that wealth morally and ethically speaking. He would have been paying people to do everything she has done if she hadn’t sacrificed her own earning potential to be there. If he wants to treat her like his employee then he should owe her back pay for the last 20 years for handling literally everything having to do with the kids he is never home to see.

      • ME says:

        @ kate

        You think they didn’t have maids, nannies, and chefs? Of course they did. We need to stop acting like women should be paid for popping out kids. Those are HER kids too. It’s not just a man’s job to provide. Both parents should be there emotionally which he failed at it seems. He would have still worked if she had decided to have a career of her own. Lots of people do it. It’s not like all women who have kids stay at home. Look both men and women need to take this case as a learning experience. Don’t sign a pre-nup you’re not comfortable with. Also, don’t expect a tonne of money just because you popped out kids. Those kids are the reward. Kids shouldn’t have a price tag on them. He should pay child support, because those are his kids too. She needs to get a job and start providing financially for her kids too.

      • Jules says:

        Caregiving *is* a job, one which is more than full-time.

        Which is why, when you have kids, one or some of the following happens:
        a) one parent gives up a career/income – either temporarily or permanently – to stay home and care for kids
        b) another family member like a grandparent does the work (and you hope they do an ok job)
        c) you pay for a nanny or daycare
        d) you bring your kids to work with you
        e) you leave them with a friend or in a park (and run the risk of abuse, being accused of neglect, etc)

        The world runs on the unpaid, unseen labor of women. AND we are constantly told we should be grateful for it.

        I am ready and willing to go on a women’s strike, anytime.

    • Blithe says:

      Question though: If Christine has things that are her own family heirlooms, or gifts, or that she purchased prior to her marriage, she apparently still has to get her soon-to-be ex-husband’s approval. This also might be applied to things that the kids consider “theirs” but that don’t meet the carve-out for things that have been delineated as belonging to Christine. With a potentially abusive spouse (general comment, not specific to this situation and relationship) that is most definitely a “mountain”, and a mountain that can easily be cruelly and abusively manipulated by a controlling spouse — and parent.*

      * Yeah, ask me how I know this.

    • Spikey says:

      I agree. I cannot get over everyone thinking poor CB, she’s being left destitute. She is not. I might feel differently if Kevin was the one to file for divorce, but she filed AND she knew all about the prenup. It appears she got cash advances, purchased a new automobile, paid for a forensic audit all before she filed for divorce. She was planning her exit for a while. Why on earth would Kevin let her live in his house after filing for divorce? He bought the house after his first divorce so he would have his own house if he ever got married & divorced again. I went through a very contentious divorce & child custody fight; the money involved was miniscule but the same as far as emotions go, divorce sucks. I cannot fault him for wanting his house and for her not to take any of his stuff. She’s going to get plenty of $$, she needs to leave and set up her own house, buying her own furniture. The kids are going to live at both parents homes, why would he have her take all the kids furniture? The kids are going to need beds at both homes. I’m just not seeing Kevin as the bad guy here, he’s following the prenup they both signed.

    • Lol says:

      “Typically thinking like the second wife…”

      Wow. Your bitterness at being replaced is dripping from your comments.

      • Isa says:

        The thing is, I bet more than anything he didn’t want her working because that would cut into her availability with his shooting schedule. I’m not married to a man as a man as rich as him with multiple homes and he still doesn’t want me working hours that would cut into our time.

      • ama1977 says:

        I know this was yesterday’s post and nobody will probably see this, but OMG STOP saying she “popped out kids.” Labor and delivery is strenuous, difficult, and painful under the BEST circumstances and can be debilitating or deadly for women. You would probably say I “popped out” my two (easy, relatively short labors with few interventions) and it still took weeks to recover from the first “easy” birth (hello, perineal tearing!)

        Also, I am so with everyone noting that her unpaid labor helped him advance his career and should be recognized. Yes, I love my children and they are their own reward, but raising them is HARD. Even if you have people to help with the actual cleaning/cooking part and childcare help, the emotional labor is still off the charts. Unless she was completely hands-off in every realm (and nothing indicates that to be the case) she provided something of value to their family that deserves recognition. She shouldn’t just be “grateful” for the “reward” of having children and allow him to devalue the fact that she put her life on hold to care for their family so he could continue in his chosen profession.

  21. Whynot says:

    “HIS” house says it all. A marriage is a partnership. It should be their house; “THEIR” home that they built together over the years. She spent twenty years supporting him and caring for their children and this is the thanks she gets? Kevin is a cold-hearted snake. The kids are going to realize how shady, greedy and selfish he is, if they don’t already know.

    • SarahLee says:

      It is his house per the terms of their pre-nup. Sorry, but you can’t sign a bad agreement and then complain that you signed a bad agreement. She should have been very clear on what was coming. He did it to wife #1. Why should wife #2 think she was special? He’s enforcing their pre-nup, which he has every right to do. We would all do that. Doesn’t mean he can’t and won’t do more for the kids, but she’s gonna get what she’s gonna get based on that legal document.

      • Why not says:

        Yes, we all know the prenup was bad for her and she signed it. That’s not the point. After 20 years, Kevin should show more respect to the woman who raised his children. He is coming out of this looking like a vindictive, greedy, petty asshole. Giving her a bit more than the shitty deal he roped her into decades ago would create goodwill from his children and the public in general. The kids will know it’s a bum deal and how poorly he’s treated their mother. He can dig his heels in and he has the legal right. Morally, he is scum. That is my point. Blaming his soon to be ex wife for something she signed decades ago out of (presumably) love, is heartless.

      • Flower says:

        The prenup deal is MAJORLY insulting, because essentially she only earned $52k per year with no adjustment for inflation or the value she added to his life over the years.

        A true transactional narc (i.e. not a high fisted arsehole) who have at least offered $500k for every year.

    • Flower says:

      This was never a ‘marriage’ or ‘partnership’, he merely acquiesced to ‘marrying’ her when she issued an ultimatum after playing professional gf for a number of years.

      He was clearly always detached and continued to live as a single man in his head. Imagine what she and the kids have been subject to all these years understanding that Dad was never really committed to them.

      Men like this are Narcs who engage in contractual relationships until they no longer suit them. I am guessing that she eventually developed enough self worth to leave.

      So horrible.

      • pk says:

        Well starting a marriage off because of an “ultimatum” doesn’t seem like a good idea. The terms of the pre-nup should have been a huge red flag for her that this dude didn’t really want to get married and probably wasn’t going to take the marriage seriously.

  22. B says:

    Ending a marriage is hard, navigating a divorce is tricky and emotionally draining and she is also the primary caregiver for 3 young children. Christine also appears to have no money of her own. Is the judge really going to hold it against her that she thought through her divorce and is trying to make sure she has adequate funding, a home, and transportation after the divorce??

  23. Kokiri says:

    So do I need to say it again?

    I told you so. “She signed the prenup!”

    This woman is being abused in real time, right in front of us.

  24. Flower says:

    Horrible just horrible.

    Nearly 20 years of marriage and you’re treated like a tenant moving out. No wonder she’s divorcing him.

    I’ve seen instances like this where the second wife and her kids are treated horribly as if they were just co-tenants evicted, his children will despise him one day.

  25. Feebee says:

    The tone taken by Costner has definitely set the mood. The actions of the judge don’t bode well. It certainly lends credibility to any idea that she has been financially abused throughout the marriage and this is a continuation of it.

  26. Julie says:

    While i have sympathy for her and any woman in an acrimonious divorce, i dont think she’s a very astute person. She signed a terrible prenup thinking that divorce would never happen, that they were special, then spent the next 20 years earning zero money, this isn’t your typical housewife, doing the laundry, the cooking and the cleaning. She had 3 children and has done little else during that time. Of course it would be great if costner wasn’t such a tight fisted asshole but she knew this when she signed the terms of that prenup, he was showing her black on white what kind if man he was.

    • B says:

      If what you wrote was true, and she is not an astute woman, then this seems like a punishment that is out of proportion to the proverbial crime.

  27. LaurenAPMT says:

    I know someone who is good friends with Kevin Costner… I have disliked KC on a personal level since he told the person I know that “the pandemic was hard for him because he was having to spend so much time with his wife and kids”. Seriously s***bag, the pandemic was hard for you because you had to spend time with the family you created? I mean, millions of people died, but sure, you do you.

  28. MC says:

    Having been through a terrible, contentious divorce recently, I will say it’s standard practice for judges to order nothing other than personal items are removed when a spouse leaves (or is kicked out of) the home. Any items over a certain value have to be assessed or included under shared property. So if she’s being forced to leave, she’ll have to leave everything behind over a certain value that deems it part of “community property”.

    I’m heartbroken for her and he seems like such.an.ass****. Having been through it, I imagine his plan is to run her into the ground with legal fees until she breaks from the finances and emotional pressure. It’s disgusting, but a common power-driven tactic.

  29. bisynapticb says:

    Woman plans divorce. Shocking.

  30. Arizona says:

    I’m not gonna fall all over myself that she should be treated like gold because she had three kids. it’s a divorce, people. that doesn’t mean she should be given whatever she wants and allowed to stay in a home that he owned prior to her and allowed to take whatever she wants, and it’s straight up delusional to think so.

    he sounds like an ass, but I don’t think most of us would be kind if our spouse blind sided us with a divorce and had also taken a lot of money in advance to prepare for it, and then refused to move out of a home like they’d signed an agreement saying they would. and I’m still convinced that if we were talking about say, Jennifer Lawrence and her husband, we would feel differently. remember when Kelly Clarkson’s husband wouldn’t move out of their Montana ranch and wanted a bunch of money? the reaction sure was different (and that was before we found out he’d taken a bunch of money from her earnings).

    it’s just funny how different the reactions here are when it’s a man who’s the rich one. both of these people seem miserable and hellbent on making it difficult for their children. also everyone keeps being like “they have three young children!” uh, they’re 13-15 years old, those are teenagers, not young children. still kids! but young children makes it sound like they’re 3-5 lol.