This is sort of a niche story, but it’s fascinating to me. For years, Scott Feinberg has been a very powerful entertainment journalist, primarily working for the Hollywood Reporter. He also gets gigs at film festivals, interviewing actors and directors for Q&A sessions, and he has a THR-affiliated podcast. Last year, Feinberg wrote a disgusting commentary piece comparing Letitia Wright’s anti-vaccine comments to actual abusers and rapists like Woody Allen, Roman Polanski, Brad Pitt, Casey Affleck and more. Letitia called him out and called out THR for publishing that extremely offensive hit-piece. Afterwards, Feinberg took a social media break (people were attacking him online) but he still works for THR and he’s still an “important” entertainment reporter and awards-season prognosticator. Which might explain why Feinberg thinks he should get to see film screenings before literally anyone else, and if his demands are not met, there will be consequences??
A well-respected awards columnist at The Hollywood Reporter is causing a stir in Hollywood media over an email he sent to studios and strategists last week, requesting priority access to the hottest movies coming this year. If the studios didn’t comply, there may be consequences, he suggested in the email. “As you plan the rollout of your film(s), I would like to respectfully ask that you not show films to any of my fellow awards pundits before you show them to me, even if that person represents himself or herself to you as (a) a potential reviewer of it, (b) needing to see the film in order to be part of decisions about covers, or (c) really anything else,” Scott Feinberg, THR’s executive editor of awards, wrote in the email reviewed by Vanity Fair.
“We feel that doing so is plainly unfair to THR, as it puts us at a competitive disadvantage, especially at film fests, where every second counts,” Feinberg wrote. “It is not unreasonable to ask you to insist that someone is either an awards pundit or a critic/cover editor, but not both, at least during awards season,” he added, expressing apparent frustration that critics and editors who also do awards punditry jump him—primarily an awards pundit—in line to get access to screenings. Feinberg, a longtime Hollywood columnist, is known for the “Feinberg Forecast,” in which he predicts various showbiz awards races, and for his interview-driven Awards Chatter podcast.
In the email, he went on to imply that there would be repercussions for studios that continued to widely distribute invitations to screenings, and that “moving forward, [THR] may take that into consideration during the booking of roundtables, podcasts, and other coverage,” he wrote, referring to the sought-after spots on the outlet’s celebrity-fueled discussion series. Sources who saw the email—which I’m told went out widely and has since circulated even further—found it either a faintly absurd attempt to get ahead of his competitors or an implied threat that they had to take seriously.
“As somebody who’s organizing and spearheading an Oscar campaign this year for a certain title, it just puts a really bad taste in my mouth,” says one senior publicist at a top studio, who notes that the decision to screen early “lives with me, and it lives with people who are working with filmmakers.” They added: “This culture of prescreening has just clearly gotten a little bit out of control if you have these kinds of emails going around, where people are demanding they see it before their competitors, who are actually their colleagues.”
Penske Media Corporation took over operations of THR in 2020, as it continued to expand its entertainment news footprint. The company also oversees Deadline, Variety, Rolling Stone, Billboard, and Indiewire. A spokesperson for PMC clarified in a statement that Feinberg “did not in any way mean to imply that he should see films before others, but just that all awards analysts should see them at the same time and not be given preferential treatment,” adding that the email was “inartfully worded” and that Feinberg plans to follow up with the studios and strategists to make that clear. “It was Scott’s understanding that there have been instances where other awards analysts have gotten early access to a film by also claiming to be a reviewer and were able to see films before others. Any suggestion of consequences for not providing early viewing access to Scott was not the intent,” the spokesperson said.
The email was “inartfully worded,” good thing Scott Feinberg isn’t being paid to, you know, write about movies and actors and art. Despite Penske Media’s sad attempt at ass-covering, it’s clear that Feinberg is a giant diaper baby who can’t handle other film critics and entertainment journalists seeing movies before him. You mean The Great Scott Feinberg might have to go to the second screening? You mean The Wrap and Entertainment Weekly got to see a movie before Scott Feinberg?! There will be consequences! He will bad-mouth your movie, refuse to put your actors in THR’s roundtable discussions, and kneecap your Oscar buzz! Jesus.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
-
- Host Scott Feinberg at the 38th Annual Santa Barbara International Film Festival at Arlington Theatre, Santa Barbara, California, USA, on 10 February 2023.,Image: 755301563, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: JERRY PEREZ / Avalon
-
- SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA – FEBRUARY 10: Honoree Cate Blanchett and Scott Feinberg pose with the Outstanding Performer of the Year Award during the 38th Annual Santa Barbara International Film Festival at the Arlington Theatre on February 10, 2023 in Santa Barbara, California.,Image: 771116337, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: LE / LE / Avalon
-
- SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA – FEBRUARY 10: Scott Feinberg speaks onstage at the Outstanding Performer of the Year Award Ceremony during the 38th Annual Santa Barbara International Film Festival at the Arlington Theatre on February 10, 2023 in Santa Barbara, California.,Image: 771116691, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: RS / RS / Avalon
What a despicable specimen of the typical privileged white male. How tone-deaf and entitled can one person be? Is it to do with his clearly visible Napoleon complex?
Fingers crossed that the only consequence of these mails is that he’s fired.
No ifs and buts.
This kind of behavior is inexcusable.
100% he was NOT asking for all media to get screenings at the same time lol. But nice walk back. This is the typical flail when someone realises we are living in an era where white male privilege gets checked instead of being blindly obeyed.
Okay, so as I’m understanding this, his ask seems partly reasonable, to the extent that he’s asking that all awards pundits get roughly the same access to the movies, and that an awards pundit can’t say “well I’m a critic too so I get priority over those who are just awards pundits.” So he doesn’t want any pundits jumping the line in front of him under the guise that they’re critics. (I did not know there was such a divide between the two, but apparently there is. I also did not realize that there was such competition over prescreenings but again…..apparently there is.)
however, he completely loses me here – “you not show films to any of my fellow awards pundits before you show them to me.” That’s clearly demanding that he gets priority to the movies BEFORE his fellow pundits. He doesnt say “all films should be available to all pundits at the same time,” he says “you can’t show movies to any pundits before you show them to me” and then goes on for the bit about “repercussions.”
So its clear he thinks HE should get priority over everyone else, and I’m sure he said exactly what he thought/meant in that email.
Yet another mediocre person who thinks they are important.
I’m gonna use a technical term in my review of Feinberg’s email:
Icky.
Here’s my attempt at punditry: He’s lost the plot.
(Maybe the studios will start sending me advance screening copies of movies I have no time to watch now….🤣🤣)
Welp, it would only take studio heads to deny Feinberg access to their films and complain to the THR to get him cancelled pretty quickly. Also, THR is ONE of many entertainment industry mags and can easily fold despite it’s history. THR and Feinberg can be replaced. Both should watch it. Feinberg’s ego needs to be checked — you review movies for a living, you don’t make and break box office or determine who gets awards (predictions don’t count). The audacity of this little, little, little, little man.
What an egomaniac!
His email reads like the semi-drunk ramblings of a man panicked about losing his relevance and maybe job. Wouldn’t surprise me if he flames out soon
I don’t really get the threat here. Studios probably benefit from his work but they don’t need him. He, however, does need them. All they have to do is to say, “Well OK, you get no access,” and then he’s out of a job.
Scott Feinberg is a racist twit. He blocked me on Twitter years ago when I called him on a thinly veiled racist tweet he had posted about a Black actor. Your assessment if him is accurate: He is in fact a giant diaper baby.
Living proof that on any level of an industry there will always be people who feel entitled and exert the power available to them. Even more astonishing that a journalist who sees himself as more deserving of special treatment is obviously not skillful enough to “artfully word” his emails.
That’s a disgusting move by Feinberg, and PMC’s statement is bluntly gaslighting, as if others can’t read.
The things arrogant people still put in writing lol.
Right?! And in an email at that, which can be forwarded to gazillions in the blink of an eye!
Penske Media = monopoly if they own that many industry outlets?
This db has to go if they want to hold on to any shred of credibility. Canceled!
The bigger issue here is that Penske Media owns basically EVERY trade paper/magazine for Film, TV and Music, as well as awards shows and production companies. The only trade they don’t seem to own it The Wrap. That is very concerning and clearly a monopoly. How was that allowed to happen?