Lady Gaga wins dognapping reward case, doesn’t have to pay $500,000


In 2021 Lady Gaga was in Rome filming House of Gucci when her three French Bulldogs were dognapped — well, two of the three were taken. Miss Asia said “f— this” and ran away — and her dog walker Ryan Fischer was shot and in critical condition. Gaga put up a controversial “no questions asked” reward of $500k for the safe return of Koji and Gustave (that the LAPD was not happy about). Asia was recovered and the other Frenchies were returned. The woman who returned them, Jennifer McBride, ended up being arrested along with four other assailants. Not one to let a pesky little arrest get in the way of her payday, McBride sued Gaga to get the reward money. This week a judge ruled that no, Gaga does not have to pay McBride $500k for returning the dogs that she aided in stealing in the first place:

The case: Lady Gaga does not have to pay a $500,000 (£410,000) reward to a woman who returned her dogs after they were stolen in 2021, a US judge has ruled. Jennifer McBride previously sued the star for the “no questions asked” reward, plus $1.5m (£1.2m) in damages. But the judge said Ms McBride couldn’t claim the money because her role in returning the star’s dogs had led to a conviction of receiving stolen goods. She argues she was just making sure the two bulldogs were returned safely. Ms McBride’s lawyer said the singer and actress had committed a breach of contract and fraud by not paying up following their return. But in a ruling this week, Judge Holly J Fujie said Ms McBride was “not entitled to thereafter benefit from their wrongdoing by seeking to enforce the contract”.

The crime: In February 2021, Ryan Fischer was walking Lady Gaga’s three French bulldogs in Hollywood when he was shot in the chest in what the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office called “a cold-hearted violent act”. He survived, but had to have part of his lung removed. Last December, James Howard Jackson was sentenced to 21 years in prison for attempted murder. Jackson and his accomplices took two of the dogs, Koji and Gustave, following the shooting. A third, Miss Asia, ran away and was later found by police. The two stolen dogs were returned unharmed by Ms McBride two days later after Gaga offered the reward.

The charge: Ms McBride was arrested along with four others in April 2021, and was charged with being an accessory to attempted murder. In December, she struck a plea deal to have that charge dropped, and pleaded no contest to receiving stolen property, for which she was sentenced to two years probation. She denied having been involved in the theft, saying she only took possession of Lady Gaga’s pets “for the specific purpose of ensuring their protection and safely returning them”. That’s something the Grammy and Oscar-winner’s lawyers argued “makes no sense”. The judge has now upheld a previous ruling, saying Ms McBride cannot claim the reward because she “has unclean hands that prevent her from profiting from her actions”.

[From BBC News]

“But your honor… I still returned the dogs. Give me my reward!” Ok, even if McBride maintains privately that she had nothing to do with the dognapping, and even if that is the truth (unlikely) then she only took the plea deal to get out of the accessory to murder charge. Even with all that, in the eyes of the law McBride pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property. That is what this judge was legally bound to refer to when rendering a decision. I don’t think McBride thought this one through (nor do I think her lawyer did a good job advising her). That being said, it was never a good idea for Gaga to offer a “no questions asked” reward. Emotionally I understand how she made the decision and she is extra. Still, I expect someone of Gaga’s net worth to have an army of people on retainer to help her think things through.

But what’s important here is that Ryan Fischer survived (although holy crap I didn’t know he had to have part of a lung removed), all of the dogs were safely returned, and those involved in the crime have been held accountable. And people the world over learned that Miss Asia don’t play.

Photos via Instagram and credit: INFphoto.com and TS, PacificCoastNews/Avalon

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Lady Gaga wins dognapping reward case, doesn’t have to pay $500,000”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kaye says:

    In the pic where her hair is falling to the side, I thought that was Kim Kardashian.

  2. Juju says:

    I do think it was a good idea to include that phrase. I mean… without the reward and the inclusion of the phrase “no questions asked” she likely would never have gotten the dogs back. So I totally understand why she used it.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      I think it was incredibly smart. Regardless if the police like it or not- these are the things that get positive results.

      I’m sure she was talking to people who negotiate with terrorists. Like she didn’t just throw that out there. Gaga IS extra so she would have called the head of the FBI and said she needed to talk to everyone in charge of negotiating kidnappings.

  3. Bumblebee says:

    There was so much publicity about this that there was no way these robbers could sell these dogs. I remember at the time being so worried they were just going kill them. That’s probably why she offered the reward that way. Still can’t believe she got those dogs back.

  4. Jess says:

    I think she was fine to offer the reward since she actually has the money and it wouldn’t change her way of life. I don’t trust the LAPD and don’t think they are the best in terms of actually solving cases. The reward made it so that she got the dogs back promptly. She should give the $500k to the dog walker.

  5. lucy2 says:

    That was such a crazy situation. I still don’t know how the woman who helped steal them thought she was entitled to the reward! Very glad all the dogs were safe.
    Most importantly glad the dogwalker survived, I hope he is doing OK, and has everything he needs.

  6. Lau says:

    Bold of that lady to sue for the reward and it must have cost her a lot in lawyer expenses for nothing.

  7. BlueNailsBetty says:

    Yeeeeeah, nothing says “innocent” like making a plea deal to avoid being charged with accessory to murder.