Scobie: The Susan Hussey debacle proved that the palace hasn’t modernized

Almost a year ago exactly, the Susan Hussey debacle unfolded in real time. Queen Camilla hosted her first big palace event as consort, and the event was also an unveiling of her new “Queen’s companions,” aka ladies-in-waiting. One of the companions was Baroness Susan Hussey. Hussey used her authority and privilege to berate Ngozi Fulani, the CEO of Sistah Space. Fulani then had the “temerity” to speak out about Hussey’s racist treatment online and in several interviews. Omid Scobie included the whole drama in Endgame. Some highlights:

The palace’s claim that they apologized to Fulani immediately: Despite the statement’s claim to the contrary, Fulani didn’t receive any official correspondence until almost a week later. The Palace also failed to explain why Lady Susan was put in such a role in the first place. An octogenarian and trusted advisor to the Queen, Hussey might have had respect from the family members, but it was unwise to put her in a public-facing position at an event with such a diverse crowd at a time when they needed to show some proof of modernization. Like so many at Buckingham Palace, she is from another era, and the mealymouthed excuses that rationalize this kind of behavior—well-meaning folks from that generation don’t know any better, for example—do not cut it.

The Queen’s companions: Repurposing six of the late Queen’s ladies-in-waiting, a feature of court life dating back to the Middle Ages, instead of allowing the women (all born in the 1930s and ’40s) to gracefully retire set the Firm up for disaster. Ironically, just days earlier, the Palace had made a show of Camilla’s “modern” decision to not hire her own ladies-in-waiting, instead bringing on informal “Queen’s companions.”… And it was more evidence that, although Charles may have a vision for modernity, the reality is the institution is still entrenched in the past, often knowingly dragging arcane, extraneous traditions along with it.

William’s swift denouncement of his godmother: Despite the fact that Hussey is his godmother, Prince William was fast to denounce and remove himself from the ugly ordeal. Behind the scenes, William was “furious” and told his team that he needed to distance himself quickly. “There was just this feeling that it could have been easily avoided,” said a source in his circle. “[William] asked, ‘Why was she there in the first place?!’”

Charles was mad about William’s response: His father, said sources, didn’t share the same approach. “It was a rash . . . knee-jerk response,” a Buckingham Palace source remarked. “The feeling was they wanted to disassociate, instead of thinking as a team.”

[From Omid Scobie’s Endgame]

Like, in a narrow way, I’ll defend William in this situation – his immediate statement, just hours after the Hussey story broke, was actually what Buckingham Palace should have done. While BP was publicly lying (about apologizing to Fulani), William at least understood that Hussey’s behavior needed to be immediately condemned. The palace not only dithered in real time, they lied and refused to manage or problem-solve the disaster for two weeks. And after the palace basically blackmailed Fulani into doing a photo-op with Hussey, Hussey was then immediately allowed to return to the royal fold, all while Fulani had to step down from Sistah Space because she was still being racially abused.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, screencaps from Sky News, Fulani’s social media.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

18 Responses to “Scobie: The Susan Hussey debacle proved that the palace hasn’t modernized”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. I think Peg distanced himself because people were thinking he was the one to ask about Archie’s skin color. That’s the only reason. The whole institution is still living and breathing as colonizers and they don’t want that to change. Status quo. May karma bring the whole lot of them down.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Yeah, when you publicly declare, “We are very much not a racist family”, and then Susan Hussey says, “Hold my beer!”, you know you gotta do damage control.

    • Beach Dreams says:

      This fiasco also came just as he and Kate touched down in Boston, and the initial stories were referring to her as “Prince William’s godmother”. He only scrambled to denounce SH so quickly because of the bad timing for Earthflop, and the British media blatantly pointing out his connection to her. I think he would’ve remained silent otherwise.

    • Sunday says:

      100%, Pegs was instantly defensive because he knows full well how racist he is, and on top of it he was in the US at the time (I believe) and so undoubtedly thought “why are they doing this to ME” when he heard the story and made the statement solely to try and keep his (boring, ignored, pointless) trip on the rails. That’s it, 100% selfishly motivated.

    • Fawsia says:

      The only way he sent that statement he was in the US! He never thinks strategically about his first reaction is a knee-jerk reaction! It was not his call, he should let his dad deal with it!

  2. Eleonor says:

    Grab her Miranda Presley wig: “The monarchy is not modernized?
    Groundbreaking”

  3. Jais says:

    Ugh, forgot about how they lied about apologizing to Fulani. What incompetent racist fools. And liars. By now it should be clear that they lie all the time.

  4. Lady Digby says:

    It can’t modernized and should be abolished. Fed up with nuclear strength PR for RF blaring out their message that they do endless charity work and therefore a force for good and we peasants should feel grateful!

    • Lorelei says:

      ITA that it should definitely be abolished, but until then, I think they should STFU about “modernizing” it and lean into the fact that they’re not the least bit modern; they’re ALL about upholding tradition. That’s what many people love about the BRF— the pomp, the parades, the ridiculous costumes they dress up in. Like…stop trying to pretend you’re something that you’re simply not.

  5. HeatherC says:

    If I remember right, didn’t the Hussey Debacle coincide with some event William had going on? Was it around the time of the Boston trip? If so, the “swift condemnation” was all about optics, distance himself from it in the hopes that it wouldn’t overshadow his event.

    • sevenblue says:

      Yes, they were about to land in USA and all the headlines were suddenly about the racist old lady, who was also assigned to “help” Meghan, in the palace. He was probably worrying about his trip getting overshadowed.

  6. Macky says:

    What the hussey incident confirmed is no one wants to work for Camilla. Back in the day Hussey would simple throughly explain herself. If it didn’t go well she would leave court/be less visible for a few years. She could then comeback.

    They don’t really have anyone to replace her. You can’t tell me this is the type of court chuck wanted. He can’t kick Andrew or his cousins out. Although papa philip tried to kick them out before we all was born.

    Can’t tell anyone to take half a year off. That’s crazy.
    The royal family has practically been abandoned.
    I think a lot of the behind the scenes aristos left with Diane. They did it slowly but it’s visible now.

  7. Gigi says:

    Re: “The feeling was they wanted to disassociate, instead of thinking as a team.” I actually thought this at the time. I felt the response from KP was so swift and to me it signaled a desire to fit an individual narrative, to deliver a headline and was missing compassion for Ngozi Fulani and us people of color.

  8. Jaded says:

    Then there was a mysterious investigation into alleged *financial improprieties* at Sistah Space only a few weeks after Husseygate. Gee…I wonder who whispered in the ear of the investigators to take Fulani down?

  9. Mariam says:

    To this day I have no idea why Harry defended lady Hussey.

  10. J.ferber says:

    She has the best callous (palace?) bitch profile I’ve ever seen.

  11. JR McGraw says:

    Not-so-fun fact: Guess who BP assigned to help Diana “learn the ropes” when she first moved to the palace in 1981.

    That’s right: Susan Hussey.

    Diana couldn’t stand her, thought she was “obsessed” with Charles and rightly saw her as just a spy. Even after Diana ended up depressed, bulimic and suicidal under Susie’s tutelage, who did BP break out to “show Meghan the ropes” when SHE first got engaged 35 years later?

    LADY SUSAN HUSSEY.

    These fools never learn a gd thing. They don’t change, they don’t adapt, they don’t course-correct, they suck up taxpayer money while being bad at everything they do because none of them got their positions on merit. Their only mandate is preserving unearned wealth and power for #ThatFamily.