A rare Disney hand-drawn, 2D animated feature grabbed the top spot this weekend at the box office, surpassing both “The Blind Side” and the Matt Damon film “Invictus.” But what is more surprising: that Disney can still open a film, even without a little help from the animation wizards at Pixar, or that the movie is actually getting very positive reviews? The film has been getting a lot of attention for the fact that it’s the first Disney film to feature an African-American female protagonist. It also is one of the few animated features to use old-school techniques instead of the more modern computer-generated graphics.
In what was neither a blast-off nor a crash, The Princess and the Frog marked Disney’s return to 2D animation with $25 million in its debut weekend in wide-release. Mid-December releases are notorious for insanely long legs. The last traditional 2D Disney cartoon to open in this slot, The Emperor’s New Groove (the funniest toon of the decade and Eartha Kitt’s finest hour) in 2000, made 9.1x its $9.3 million opening weekend ($89.3 million). So it’s tough to ascertain long-term prospects for this one. So let’s just concentrate on the opening we
ekend. First of all this movie is pretty terrific. It’s funny, emotional, scary, and genuinely romantic; so everyone who has kids or likes animation should really make a point to check it out before the end of the year. Second of all, the cold truth is that this opening was actually pretty weak. When you consider the publicity that this film received for its ‘groundbreaking’ African American characters and the buzz over the return to traditional 2D cell animation, I’m pretty sure Disney was hoping for at least a bigger opening than Bolt or Meet the Robinsons. Heck, it barely beats out the October 03 $19 million opening of Brother Bear when adjusted for inflation ($23 million at 2009 prices). And it certainly sold fewer tickets than the various $20-$22 million openings of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, Mulan, and Atlantis: The Lost Empire back when Disney was in an alleged post-Lion King ‘slump.’
Having said all of that, in terms of pure dollars, it still had the biggest 2D opening since Lilo and Stitch, which opened with $35 million back in June, 2002 ($43 million adjusted for inflation). Besides, this film was very much a ‘girl movie’, and there has always been a certain hesitancy for boys when it comes to seeing female-centric entertainment. Girls will flock to The Lion King or Tarzan, but guys have to be dragged to Mulan.
I won’t go so far as to say that women (and men) should flock to movies like this in order to convince the studios to make more, as that’s not my business. But I will say that Princess and the Frog is a worthwhile antidote to the discomforting gender politics in New Moon (down a reasonable 48%, new total – $267 million). And the $105 million budget is actually quite a bit less than the $175 million-ish budgets of the recent Pixar or Disney 3D works and/or the Dreamworks features. So it doesn’t have to do Pixar business to make a tidy profit.
And, as noted above, it’s a very good movie, so I imagine there’s a decent chance of real legs as it becomes the family movie of choice for the rest of the year. Yes, Alvin and the Chipmunks: the Squeakuel will open big on Christmas Day, but it won’t have the staying power of the first film as there will actually be demo competition this time. If you’re a parent, which film would you rather take your kids to? And Disney seems to be playing a long game with their prized animation library. No one should have expected Disney to hit Lion King numbers ($41m/$70m adjusted) the first time out anymore than they should have expected Michael Jordon to score 55 points in his first post-retirement comeback game.
The traditional 2D animated film started dying out right around the time that opening weekend numbers exploded (summer 2001), so there’s only so much fair comparison to be made between this 2009 film and the films from the lower opening but leggier 1990s. Point being, I sincerely hope that this frog’s legs are strong during the brutal one-two punch of Avatar and Sherlock Holmes over the holidays.
Even “Entertainment Weekly” film critic Lisa Schwarzbaum, who hates everything, gave the movie an “A.” As for the question, “Which movie would you rather bring your kids to: Princess and the Frog or Alvin and the Chipmunks? sequel?” I’m going with “none of the above,” and choosing the new Sherlock Holmes movie! One of the perks have having kids who are a little older is that I don’t have to sit through cartoons all the time.
One promotional image from ‘The Princess and the Frog’. Anika Noni Rose at the premiere of ‘The Princess and the Frog’ in California on October 15, 2009. Credit for all: WENN.
Yay! I have a strict no animated movies clause whenever I go to the movies. I’ll make an exception for this one. As a kid would wanted to be a cartoonist, I have a special space in my heart for real animated movies. I prefer 2D movies like the Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and the Little Mermaid over the CGI fare they crank out every few months.
It would be nice if I had a niece to take to this one. Doubt my nephew would be up for this one — that, and it’s doubtful he would sit through any 2 hour movie.
yeah i cant wait to see this, finally a black princess.
it was a good movie. less than 2 hours, only about 86 minutes. My sons were entertained by the variety of characters in the film and the overall good story. it wasn’t overly girlie or romantic.
This looks great, looks like it’s set in New Orleans too?
And the princess doesn’t seem like a dim-witted moron? (*cough cough, little mermaid)
Count me (and my two little girls) in.
I didn’t even know that this movie was opening this weekend. I haven’t seen one single promotion on TV.
I loved the Lion King and The Little Mermaid and I’ll definitely watch this movie.
Anika Noni Rose looks beautiful in those pics.
Ugh. I really want to love this movie, as I adore Disney animated features, but I just listened to the soundtrack, and it’s basically a love song to New Orleans. I want Disney music based around the characters and their silly love affair, not a city.
Saw it and it was great. I probably enjoyed it more than my 3-year-old nephew. A must see.
Kudos to Disney!!! I saw this wonderful movie over the weekend. They did a very fine job and it’s going to become one of their classics. The entire family will enjoy it!
Princess, shmincess. Not into Disney’s objectification of girls as princesses. There are lots of little girls whose parents don’t care to learn about the psycho-social dynamic of “every little girl being a princess,” when many little girls would rather be something else. I don’t think my sister and I played “princess” the way some girls do now: princess parties, princess dresses, princess bikes (by Huffy)–the list goes on.
I’ll probably go see this, since I’m a massive Disney princess fan. But I still don’t understand why, if they wanted a black princess so badly, they couldn’t have based it in Africa, India or any other place where they actually, you know, had royalty.
Love their old-school 2D artwork. I read somewhere that this would probably be their last cartoon drawn like this. Sad if that’s true, really sad!
Kelbees, they’ve got a few other 2D films planned for the future. They reopened the 2D department (which they’d shut down) so this isn’t they’ve last list.
Basically their last 2D films before this sucked and tanked at the box office meanwhile Pixar was hugely successful so they assumed noone wants to 2D anymore, overlooking the fact that pixar was making good STORIES while Home on the Range sucked.
It’s about time a hand-drawn cartoon movie came out again. As much as I like the CGI movies, I think it’s lame that those are the only “animated” movies coming out anymore. I’m so exciting to see this, even my boyfriend wants to!
Good to know, Ben!
We saw it over the weekend with my 4 year old daughter. I think it was a little long for her. She asked at one point if the movie was almost done. The colors were more muted then usual Disney movies I think and some parts were scary for her (the black shadows).
I LOVED this movie. I don’t want to give anything away, but I loved the message, the plot, the MUSIC, the 2D form, the fact that the main character was smart and knew the value of hard work.
I did find it interesting that her dad looked like very much African American, yet the prince, who was also African American, looked exactly like every Disney prince before (i.e. white) but had darker skin.
I’d recommend the movie for sure.
Correction: the prince was not African American as not from U.S. BUT he was black, but looked white to me.
@Hairball, I think the prince is supposed to be Brazilian.
from imdb.com:
What race/nationality is Prince Naveen?
Prince Naveen has purposely been made racially ambiguous, hailing from the fictional country of Maldonia, which has no known location. He is not meant to be black or white and can only be classified as ‘other’, since Maldonia does not exist. The fact that he has dark skin does not necessarily identify him as being African, as some would have the viewers believe. In fact, the Disney studios describe Naveen as being a dark-skinned Caucasian (for more information, see here). Dark-skinned Caucasians can be found all over Europe, the Middle East, North and South America, Asia, the Caribbean, etc. Even the fact that Naveen speaks English with an accent that sounds French, does not help to pinpoint his ethnicity, as French is spoken in many places other than France, e.g., Tahiti, Canada, Haiti, Vietnam, Algeria, Mali, Togo, Madagascar, and Senegal, just to name a few.
I was so looking forward to seeing this movie…..