Palace sources scoff at the ‘credibility’ issues of ‘The Crown’ & ‘Endgame’

The Telegraph’s royal editor Hannah Furness’s original headline was “Why this is the most important picture of the royal family since Queen Elizabeth died,” referencing the photo of King Charles, Camilla, William and Kate standing together at Tuesday evening’s Diplomatic Reception. That headline was changed to: “Is the Royal family’s message of unity enough to save the monarchy?” Which is better? I actually like the second version – it’s more open-ended, less of a bold statement “this photo is important” versus “is this photo that important?” Anyway, the point of this piece is: where do the left-behind Windsors go from here? The answer is “???”

The photo from the Diplomatic Reception: It could be, observers noted, the most important image since the death of Elizabeth II more than a year ago. Or, said a palace insider present at its taking: “It’s [just] a nice up-to-date picture of the four of them.” In other words, there were no frantic phone calls to assemble the 2023 royal “Fab Four” especially for the occasion. “This was them getting on with the job,” another shrugged. “There was no change to the schedules in reaction to anything. This was when the diplomatic reception was happening – it’s a key event in the royal calendar. What it shows is an unwavering commitment to duty and service and that is the plan today, next week and long into the future.”

The influential Sussexes: The influence of the Sussexes’ version of life in the Royal family persists, despite their pointed silence over the latest allegations which began in their own Oprah Winfrey interview and have never quite gone away. Endgame, with its portrayal of Prince William as an angry, jealous, power-hungry heir and the palace staff as omnipotent master manipulators of the media, tallies remarkably with Prince Harry’s autobiography, Spare, and the Sussexes interviews to date. The storylines on The Crown, broadcast on Netflix – which signed the Sussexes up for a multi-year, multimillion-dollar deal – have been influenced by Harry’s version of events.

The Crown also predicts the monarchy’s endgame: Perhaps most uncomfortable of all is the theory, pressed home in multiple scenes during the final episode, that without the late Queen, the monarchy cannot survive. The rest of them are “not remotely ready”, says Philip. The ghost of the young Queen, rather improbably, tells the elderly version of herself that the rest of her family always “make such a mess of it”. That doom-laden thesis has not yet come to pass.

The whole operation hinges on Charles & William’s ability to work together: The King has been warmly received by a public who have largely embraced him as his mother’s son. The Prince of Wales, still the more popular in the polls, is planning for a future reign that he knows will have to look different to the monarchs who have come before him. Their success rests on their ability to work together. “The King and Prince have massive areas of life in which they overlap and support each other,” said a palace source of their current working relationship. “They also have their distinctive interests. On their support for the monarchy and the institution, they are totally in agreement.” Another noted: “They are talking regularly about issues around their work and the institution.” On the challenges outside the royal households, aides are – or at least try to be – sanguine.

Palace aides bitching about The Crown & Omid Scobie: “Everyone stopped caring about The Crown long ago,” said one palace source. “It’s lost whatever qualities it once had. I think everyone has got the message it’s make believe. And Endgame is about as credible as The Crown. It is a vanishingly small minority of people that believe it, they’re not going to change their minds, but to everyone else it’s wholly unreliable.”

[From The Telegraph]

I never get tired of palace seething with a thin veneer of performative apathy. “Scobie isn’t credible, neither is The Crown,” meanwhile Charles was in emergency-mode for YEARS over a Netflix show and the monarchy had to hold emergency crisis talks over yet another racism outbreak documented by Omid Scobie. The real point of this, for me, was the acknowledgement that in the immediate future, the whole thing hinges on William not stabbing his father in the back. Hilarious. Of course, that’s well-documented in Endgame as well – the fact that Charles and William aren’t actually close at all and they’d both sell each other out for one sliver of temporary power, or even just one good 24-hour newscycle.

Also, with all of the talk about the importance of Tuesday night’s photo, I think people are forgetting the other “Nu Fab Four” photo where they were smiling like horses’ asses just days after QEII died.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Buckingham Palace and Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

54 Responses to “Palace sources scoff at the ‘credibility’ issues of ‘The Crown’ & ‘Endgame’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Loretta says:

    More than the Fab Four they look like four old mummies

    • Lady D says:

      I still say William was photoshopped into the new ‘fab four’ picture.

      • Jaded says:

        Totally photoshopped in Lady D, Kate may very well have been too. The lighting on her face is markedly different than the others. Just more performative fakery.

    • swaz says:

      Fab four or DRAB FOUR 🤣🤣🤣 I just scanned through the Telegraph’s article to find Meghan and Harry’s name because I knew it was going to be in there somewhere 🤣🤣🤣

  2. No one who tells the truth is credible in the royal cults opinion. Facts are a real pain in the 🫏 for them. The two older ones don’t look long for this world. They look very unhealthy. The other two don’t have a brain cell between them so don’t expect anything from them. Which leaves us with it is very true that once QEII died she kinda took the monarchy with her and what’s left is unusable and lifeless.

    • SueBarbri33 says:

      C&C really do look terrible.

    • antipodean says:

      Susan, the palace should hire you as an adviser! Your summation of their situation is masterful. When will they ever get it right, and how can they still be so bad at this? I bet ol’ Lizzie is spinning in her grave!

    • Cali says:

      Charles will definitely outlive Camilla. His family is famously long lived and he appears to have a healthy lifestyle.
      Camilla on the other hand is aging in dog years.
      I think it will be interesting when Camilla is gone or when she is no longer able to function as Charles’ mummy/nanny/soother. Charles likes to be cosseted by women. It wouldn’t surprise me if he installed a new mummy figure in his life. And I’m sure William would be enraged by that scenario.

  3. Brassy Rebel says:

    Most of the time, a photo is just a photo. Except for the Windsors. Every photo they pose for has profound meaning apparently. These people can’t organize a one car parade, but the future of the British monarchy depends on them. They really need a plan B.

    • KASalvy says:

      Yet they can’t even get a *photo* right. This one is photoshopped. Williams feet are behind charles, yet his shoulders are in front…

      • SarahCS says:

        Ooh yes, I hadn’t noticed that before.

      • SarahCS says:

        And in both pictures William’s torso is in front of everyone else. Isn’t there some protocol about not pushing in front of the king? Being in front of Kate is NOT a surprise.

  4. JanetDR says:

    So attending an event on your work calendar is something marvelous?! Unwavering commitment?! I believe that I am due a few sashes and post-it awards because I do that on a regular basis! Without fanfare! Evidently I’m working for the wrong firm 🤣🤣🤣

    • SarahCS says:

      I run my own business and therefore pay myself. My software has an option to put a message on the payslip so sometimes I give my self a ‘great work!’ for giggles. Clearly I should be working for the royals where this is the norm.

  5. LADY DIGBY says:

    Both father and son are in the KING business so they really should be shoring each other up but are they too dumb to realise that or can they simply not trust each other? Insecure, dog in the manger, spiteful, jealous and stupid will see them continue to leak, upstage and sabotage each other. CC and WK are like Sartre’s play VICIOUS CIRCLE trapped in the ante room to hell forever

  6. Eurydice says:

    I have to laugh at the photo showing their ” unwavering commitment to duty.” What duty is that? The duty to dress up in expensive clothes and stolen jewels to have their picture taken?

  7. sevenblue says:

    So, they are claiming, Peter Morgan who gave a glow-up to Charles & Camilla’s love affair and ruined the series by bootlicking the palace in the last 2 seasons is doing Harry’s work? Also, I love how they claim Omid is not a credible journalist, then don’t even see the need to elaborate which part of the book is incorrect. The “journalist” writing the article doesn’t even ask them to say clearly on what Omid is lying about. I guess, when Harry’s lawsuits proceed, we are gonna see who is lying.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      As far as they are concerned, the only credible journalists are the ones who take dictation from them.

  8. Becks1 says:

    So this is part of the issue, right?

    “This was when the diplomatic reception was happening – it’s a key event in the royal calendar. What it shows is an unwavering commitment to duty and service and that is the plan today.”

    The diplomatic reception – where they wear designer gowns, priceless jewels and fake orders, swan about a palace for a few hours and pretend to make nice with the people who are actually in public service – is the epitome of “an unwavering commitment to duty and service?”

    It may have been “duty” but its not service. What is considered “service” as changed significantly over the past few years, maybe decades, and the idea that Kate showing up in her tiara and diamond earrings is “service” is just laughable at this point. It makes it sound like they are lowering themselves to do these types of things in the name of “duty and service.” Can you imagine Jill Biden saying about a state dinner – “well I had to go in the name of duty and service.”

    the palace might have thought that picture showed unity but I thought it showed the last embers of a dying, out of touch institution.

    • Eurydice says:

      Lol, I posted a much less eloquent version at the same time as you did.

      I also have to laugh at the idea that the RF and staff are “scoffing.” Is that what they’ve been doing ever since Oprah? The OED needs to add another definition to that word. “The Royal Scoff – running around madly like Keystone Kops, bumping into walls, blindly flailing and panicking, savagely snapping, clawing and biting, in a state of constant confusion and contradiction. “

  9. Pinkosaurus says:

    Other than Kaiser who does God’s work plowing through this well of BS This o bring us these tidbits, I wonder how many readers even clicked on or read through this article to get the “Fake News! Nobody believes it!” message from the palace? I’m guessing very few because even with the new headline, this is dry and dull. Without M&H in the photo and header, I don’t they are getting much active consumption of their propaganda.

    • Jais says:

      Lol, okay this is kind of true. Propaganda has to be consumed but if these four are too boring to even read about and if even there pics are dull, then people will slowly consume less propaganda. Unless of course they sneak it in through their sussex-baiting articles, which actually that pretty much is the strategy now.

    • Michelle says:

      One of the highlights of the “Endgame” drop last week was The Telegraph quoting Kaiser. Proof that Kaiser lives rent free in the minds of the men in grey. I think we should acknowledge the royal enablers more often lol. Hello Buckingham Palace!

  10. SussexWatcher says:

    Their own stupidity will be their downfall. As Omid said, they can’t strategize themselves out of a paper bag!

    The best way to have responded to the Crown and Omid’s book would have been radio silence! Or some sort of “oh please, that drivel” comment and then radio silence. Instead they send their minions out to badmouth and threaten Omid and to announce more emergency crisis talks. All that does is keep their own stupid racist behavior in the press. They Streisand effected it into the stratosphere and have only themselves to blame.

    • Laura D says:

      @SussexWatcher – or do as Harry did on Stephen Colbert. Admit to watching it and having a laugh at what they’ve got wrong. Showing a sense of humour about the whole thing would have put the whole thing to bed. Instead all they’ve done is continually “complain and explain.”

    • Jojo says:

      They don’t much care if the racist stuff is in the press. Or affair allegations. Or clothes/hair/appearance comments. They view all these things as easily ignored, deniable, occupational hazards and topics to keep ‘the plebs’ entertained. These big gun distraction/deflection articles & royal stunts only really come out when their financial dealings or potential legal issues are excessively noticed/reported & widely commented on. Everything from the last week was to drown out & bury the intestacy story. The firm needed to stop people thinking/talking about the ethical stance re: this passive income generated year on year via dead people. What is being done with the money/assets, (ie being privately invested to make Charles even more free, unaccountable money) and why the RF Duchies are often benefiting from the misfortune of others.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    The fact that the Royal Family photo is not usually released prior to the Diplomatic Reception and that Chris Jackson was the one called to take the photo actually contradicts the denial in this piece that there were no frantic calls. Furthermore the photo is a carbon copy of the pre-funeral one. The Palace believes that releasing a photo of the four of them together is an adequate response to the fact that the family is racist. The Royal Family needs to bring their communications strategy into the 21st century.

  12. Belli says:

    Has anyone – the rota, anonymous royal sources, anyone – actually come out and said “This didn’t happen. No one in the family expressed concerns about the skin color of Harry and Meghan’s future children.”?

    • Becks1 says:

      No.

      They’ve said H&M misunderstood, they’ve had POC come out to say this happens in every family, they’ve said H&M were overly sensitive about this, they’ve said it was a joke, they’ve said they’re “very much not a racist family” – but to my knowledge they’ve never said “this conversation never happened.”

      • Trilogy says:

        I am American and white, so white that 23 and Me said you may be the whitest person we have ever seen.

        I am a grandmother of mixed race beautiful little girls. My son in law is mixed race the same as Duchess Meghan. I will be honest there was discussion when my daughter was pregnant as to the skin color, eye color and hair type of the girls (twins) before they were born. My son in law was the first to bring it up.

        The whole family was very excited for the addition of my son in law into our family and love and respect him tremendously. The twins are beautiful and look very much like Archie!

        That said, H&M DID NOT MISUNDERSTAND. It was completely acceptable to trash Meghan in THE FAMILY, the press and in every royal household. There is a difference between an excited I wonder if they will have green eyes or curly hair and the things that were obliviously said about Archie. Enough so that Meghan felt suicidal. I don’t think there is any coincidence that when she was pregnant the hate increased.

        The royal family as a whole are terrible people. Entitled, jealous, retched and incapable of familiar love.

    • SueBarbri33 says:

      Nope. Not once.

    • Amy Bee says:

      No

    • Laura D says:

      No!

    • SarahCS says:

      Of course not. They have briefed the rota to refer to it as a ‘comment’ rather than the actual ‘concerns’ that were raised to continue undermining everything H&M say.

  13. ales says:

    Are we living in 2023 or the 1800’s. It appears the BRF are totally incapable of speaking for themselves. The palace aides, the palace sources , the palace insiders, the royal experts all constantly live in a world of make believe. Whenever the reality is exposing brf bad behavior, they try to gaslight the entire planet. It is a joke, an unpopular king who demands that his long term mistress be honored and respected, her history and his cheating does not exist, then the racist, mean girl, grifter commoner who stalked and preyed upon W until he gave in, has her history rewritten. There was no yacht girl, no stalker who followed W to South America, she did not change universities and courses to force herself into his life. There are many photos of her trashy behavior and now her latest exhibitionism is being ignored. W tried to destroy his mothers memories and reputation,and instead made a fool of himself. The palace experts etc. cannot censor and delete all the photos and videos showing the brf in public. These brf paid fanatics/employees of the family seem to believe that if they constantly spew hate at Harry and Meghan no one will notice how out of touch and vile the brf actually are.

    • SueBarbri33 says:

      Right? It’s a strange thing to attempt all this gaslighting and re-writing of history, since these are six of the most famous people on the planet. William has been famously angry since his Wombat days, but suddenly he’s always been a perfect gentleman who has never raged at anybody? Kate chased William to St. Andrews, but by the time they’re finished with the story, they’ll have him chasing her. Unbelievable.

  14. Mslove says:

    Look, the drab four showing their racist unity.

  15. Cassie says:

    What on earth are they good for , I mean apart from showing the world they think they are superior beings to everyone else .

    It’s just so outdated it’s ridiculous and embarrassing , dressing up like that .
    What purpose does it serve ?
    They make me want to vomit .

  16. equality says:

    “On their support for the monarchy and the institution, they are totally in agreement.” Of course, they are. That’s where they get the big money and stolen jewels. Is this supposed to make them look good.

    • Mary Pester says:

      Looking at these pictures only confirms two things.
      One, they can’t stand each other
      Two willy can’t stand keen.
      Look very closely people at keens mouth( sorry I know it’s difficult) I’m sure she is a practising ventriloquist and is saying, “can I move now please)..
      And willy replies”, yes, australia has vacancies!
      But it’s true, they can’t stand each other, what father PHONES his son if he needs to talk to him, what son has to make an appointment to see his dad, they live close enough, and willy has his own super dooper helicopter. Willy wouldn’t be trying to undermine his father every other day, and screaming around throwing pillows on the others. They wouldn’t need all these palace flunkies lieing through their teeth to the press,, or the press just lieing for lieing sake.
      The monarchy is in its death throws, problem is it won’t lay down yet.
      And Kate, if that’s a revenge dress, revenge against what, barbie or sequins?

  17. aquarius64 says:

    I’m just getting bored with the BRF and their denials. The receipts are out there thanks to the internet. In the US the Windsors are a one day story if that; and Harry gets press because he lives here and married to Meghan, one of our own (American). Name Gate has damaged Kate and to an extent William. What US company wants to do business with them with the taint of racism on them?

  18. Draadje says:

    What this profoundly tone-deaf institution simply will not understand is that these questions about racist behavior, institutional racism, their wealth, their usefulness, etc., would still have surfaced even if Harry and Meghan never existed. Look around, House of Windsor! why do you think the Dutch are apologizing for slavery and rejecting income for the heir? Why do you think Denmark is redrawing the definitions of who gets money and titles? Same for Sweden. Spain’s monarchy is hanging perhaps not by one thread, but it’s not that stable.

    The Firm is always reacting a dollar short and a minute late and then whining why things are not back to normal. Their advisors and staff are useless if they can’t explain this to their bosses.

  19. QuiteContrary says:

    The fake medals, the sashes, the jewels … all of these just serve to remind people that the monarchy is a racist and outdated institution.

  20. Jaded says:

    Many of us here at CB were of the feeling that as soon as QEII fell off her perch, the whole monarchical house of cards would start to collapse, only I didn’t think it would start happening so quickly. KFC’s brief reign has been a shambles. The senior BaRF are being outed more and more by journos and tabloids that in the past were obsequious and fawning, even if it’s a bit of bread-crumbing and shade. It’s clear there’s a huge amount of back-stabbing and jostling for position going on, and the leaking/briefing/infighting between the palace courtiers is ridiculous. The BaRF is being seen bit by bit for what they really are — a bunch of spoiled, bumbling buffoons who can’t pull their heads out of their arses long enough to see their grift is being fully exposed.

  21. [insert_catchy_name] says:

    The photos coming out lately have all been really airbrushed. “Charm offensive” indeed…

  22. VilleRose says:

    Charles and William don’t work well together and this can be seen through the royal rota and the constant briefing war between Clarence House/Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace. William may want to be careful, someday he’ll be in the same position as Charles when George is an adult. All he’s teaching George is to trash his dad (William) and criticize him through the press.

  23. Mollie says:

    Kate’s shoulder pads kill me. Why?

  24. AC says:

    “It is a vanishingly small minority of people that believe it”
    Funny that DM were mocking the sales of Endgame in the UK too. Then just today it was announced it’s on the NYTs Bestseller list which only .5% of hardcovers make it to this list each year – and a list coming from largest market in the world. Omid literally got the last laugh.

  25. Saucy&Sassy says:

    The more the palace sources scoff at Endgame, the more I realize how very close to the truth it is. I guess I could thank them for clarifying that for me.