Times: The Sussexes’ ‘misguided’ trip to Jamaica blindsided the palace!

Would you believe that the Windsors and British press are all still talking about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s surprise appearance in Jamaica? Once the shock wore off, the Windsors and their media cohorts have spent much of the past week throwing a very loud tantrum. It was “insensitive,” you see, for Harry and Meghan to go to Jamaica while Charles’s prostate is enlarged and Kate is recovering from abdominal surgery. No, it wasn’t just insensitive – it was a diplomatic snafu, a slap in the face of the crown, because the Sussexes warmly greeted the Jamaican prime minister, the same man who fired William and Kate on camera in 2022, during W&K’s absolutely disastrous Caribbean Flop Tour. Please keep Will and Kate’s colonialist disaster tour in mind while reading these highlights from the Times of London – apparently, the palace is quite upset that Harry and Meghan would bungle diplomatic relations so badly. Harry and Meghan, who were greeted warmly and behaved impeccably, all without creating an international sh-tstorm of racist imagery wherever they went (unlike you-know-who).

The Sussexes flew on a private jet to Jamaica! It is understood that the Sussexes were flown to the island by private jet courtesy of Paramount Pictures, the production company behind the new biopic Bob Marley: One Love. The pair made a surprise appearance on the red carpet of the film’s world premiere.

The Jamaica trip blindsided the palace!! However, the fact that Meghan and Harry were in Jamaica at all came as something of a surprise at the Palace. With two senior members of the royal family recovering in The London Clinic, the Sussexes’ photocall with the prime minister of Jamaica was “not what you would call ideal”, according to one well-placed source.

William & Kate’s flop tour: It didn’t help that [the Sussexes] were happy to pose with Andrew Holness, who hosted the Prince and Princess of Wales in 2022. During an official visit to the Caribbean, William and Kate had a meeting with Holness. In an awkward moment, before his guests were even invited to sit down, the prime minister told them in no uncertain terms — and with the television cameras rolling — that his country was “moving on”. William pressed his lips together and nodded. The excruciating meeting with Holness aside, the trip attracted more criticism. During a trip to Trench Town, the former home of Bob Marley, the Waleses were seen shaking hands with locals through a wire fence. There was another colonial-era flashback when they travelled in an open-topped Land Rover during a ceremonial military parade.

The Sussexes’ trip was misguided!! The timing of the Sussexes’ high-profile visit as the guests of Brian Robbins, the chief executive of Paramount, was “not especially welcome back in London” according to one well-placed source, while another said that it was “misguided”. A source close to the King suggested that Harry may well have accepted the invitation because he is oblivious to the political or familial sensitivities of being pictured with the Jamaican prime minister. Those close to Prince William pointed out that he was “concerned with other matters”, not least his wife’s health after her surgery, which will require months of recuperation.

Jamaicans love Harry & Meghan: A well-informed source said: “Harry is beloved by the Jamaicans so they could have been a great asset to the Commonwealth if they had stayed in their royal roles.”

Fascinating and very telling lie: The late Queen saw the connection they had with the “family of nations” of which she was so fond. She awarded the Sussexes Commonwealth roles, with Harry and Meghan becoming the president and vice-president of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust respectively. When it became clear that the Sussexes were not happy with their royal life in the UK, a plan was nearing completion for the couple to be stationed elsewhere in the Commonwealth. Ultimately, the offers were not sufficient to keep Harry and Meghan in the fold as working members of the royal family. They had hoped for something in between, to have the freedom to pursue their own projects while still representing Queen and country. But the late Queen decided that a “half-in, half-out” approach was not an option.

Freedom from raised eyebrows: Harry and Meghan stepped down from their official Commonwealth roles and the couple’s Netflix documentary series later described the group of countries as “Empire 2.0”. Now they are free to do as they choose, even if it raises eyebrows at the palace.

The Sussexes stayed in Jamaica after the premiere: And there may well be more to come. On Thursday night, locals on the island said that after a stop in Kingston the Sussexes moved to a luxury resort in the north of the island. However, bigger moves are expected in the US as the duchess is said to harbour political ambitions.

No coming back to the UK!! Back in the UK, there seems to be no way back for Harry and Meghan. Invitations to see the Waleses will not be forthcoming any time soon. Harry has also quietly been shelved as a counsellor of state — members of the royal family who can stand in for the King. When increasing the number of people who can carry out head of state duties to include the Duke of Edinburgh and Princess Royal, the royal household also gave a written undertaking that non-working members would not be called on. Many in the Palace believe that relations between Harry and his brother William are irreparably damaged. “Given everything that has gone on, it’s hard to see how Harry could ever come back into the fold,” a well-placed source said.

[From The Times]

A few things: “When it became clear that the Sussexes were not happy with their royal life in the UK, a plan was nearing completion for the couple to be stationed elsewhere in the Commonwealth. Ultimately, the offers were not sufficient to keep Harry and Meghan in the fold” – Harry genuinely thought he would be offered that kind of “half-in” solution, where they could live abroad (in a Commonwealth country) and still work for the crown. That was rejected by WILLIAM. And Edward Young. They continue to make it sound like Harry & Meghan just decided one day that they hated living in the UK.

As for this: The trip was “misguided” and “a source close to the King suggested that Harry may well have accepted the invitation because he is oblivious to the political or familial sensitivities of being pictured with the Jamaican prime minister.” Instead of embracing the power of the Sussexes’ grace, charm and soft diplomacy, they’re pretending that Harry and Meghan did something wrong or “misguided” by simply going to a premiere and being gracious towards local government officials. It’s not like they wandered around in neo-colonialist cosplay or greeted children through a chainlink fence, you know. Talk about misguided! Talk about oblivious!

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

53 Responses to “Times: The Sussexes’ ‘misguided’ trip to Jamaica blindsided the palace!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kay says:

    Sounds like a lot of sour grapes from the British media . They hated the fact that Harry and Meghan were warmly welcomed unlike the extremely popular William and Kate. Why shouldn’t they go as they were invited, as the members of the Royals have shunned Harry he was free to do so. Harry and Meghan have got to network to earn their keep. Don’t forget they have to earn their money they are not paid for by the British taxpayer. They also don’t have vast amount of private estates that are making a fortune.

  2. Jay says:

    Blindsided? That’s an oldie but a goodie. No doubt they are shocked at the amount of meaningful work and travel that H and M are able to accomplish!

    And recounting every Cambridge failure on the Caribbean disastour is an interesting choice…

  3. Amy T says:

    *Venimus, vidimus, vicimus.

    *They came, they saw, they conquered.

  4. equality says:

    How stupid. Like H&M, or even the royals themselves, are going to snub the leader of a commonwealth country because the country wants to become a republic. That’s not how diplomacy works and William, the diplomat, should be aware of that.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Exactly.

    • Dawning says:

      So let me get this straight: Cowmilla can host and be friendly with someone who wants to parade Meghan naked in the streets so people can throw excrement at her.
      Peggington can award people who testified against Meghan and smear her. But Harry should not be civil to the Jamaican PM. A PM who is simply advocating for his country’s desire to shrug off an oppressive colonial past.
      Talk about entitlement of these crusty old Brits.

    • Debbie says:

      Exactly @Equality: and to suggest that Harry was “unaware of the political and familial sensitivities” of meeting or being photographed with the Jamaican PM, don’t make me laugh, BM. We all saw or heard about William and Kate) and the Windsors) getting fired in public so no such luck that it was missed by Harry, I’ll bet. And, yes, the Sussexes went to Jamaica anyway, and why not?

    • Pomski says:

      William the Conqueror
      Richard the Lionheart
      William the Unfazed Father/Sexiest Bald Dude

  5. Zut Alors says:

    The BM keep saying the Sussexes have gone Hollywood and deride them for it. So why are they mad at them for attending a movie premiere including a red carpet appearance? Isn’t that a Hollywood thing to do? Pick a struggle you lot and stick to it.

  6. My god he was invited to a movie premiere not some government function but even then he is now a private citizen and can do what he darn well pleases. He has no beef with Jamaica and took pictures with people who came to the premiere and one of those people is the Prime Minister. Let’s talk about what’s going on on salt isle and not about private citizens the Sussexes.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    They are, in fact, free to do as they choose even if it raises eyebrows at the palace. Everything they do seems to raise eyebrows at the palace even when what they do is totally irrelevant to anything or anyone at the palace. This movie premiere is a case in point. And they still act as though H&M are just dying to be invited back into the fold because they keep telling us that will never happen. We know. And we and they don’t care.

  8. Meghan says:

    The Palace- you can’t come back!
    H&M- okay
    The Palace- I mean it! You can NEVER come back!!!!
    H&M- okay, got it.
    The Palace- we are never ever getting back together!

  9. Carmen says:

    “Harry is beloved by the Jamaicans so they could have been a great asset to the Commonwealth if they had stayed in their royal roles.” Who are they kidding? Jamaica and the Commonwealth are going splitsville, and once Jamaica is free of the royals, they will love Harry and Meghan for themselves, not as representatives of a toxic, obsolete monarchy.

    • equality says:

      They are hoping to lose the monarchy, but Jamaica will likely still be a member of the commonwealth of nations. That is really what the UK is afraid of losing control over. It supposedly benefits all the members, but with how covid shots were distributed, the UK has shown that isn’t entirely true. The UK wants to still have influence over business and trade in the commonwealth and are afraid of losing that.

  10. Lilpeppa40 says:

    I’ve just never understood where the idea comes from that Meghan harbors political ambitions. I used to follow her sporadically in her suits days and I’ve never once heard her say anything about that and even now when I pay somewhat closer attention, never heard a word. They really love to stir up hate in all quarters toward this woman.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    We’re seeing the press re-write history in real-time. Furthermore the Palace is behaving like Harry and Meghan are working royals. They’re free to go anywhere and anyone they want and they don’t need permission from the Palace. If the Palace wanted to maintain control over Harry and Meghan they should’ve accepted the half in proposal.

    • JudyB says:

      Right! If the palace wants to control them, it needs to recognize that they are “working” for the palace, and thus they should be paying them large fees.

      How long do you think it will take the palace staff and the rota to understand that H&M are free individuals that are NOT under their control??? I suspect that because of the low intelligence levels of these groups, the answer will be “forever.”

  12. Miranda says:

    Gosh, it’s almost like Harry and Meghan are private citizens who don’t have to inform the palace of their comings and goings, or even give a f–k about what the palace thinks anymore…

  13. Ginger says:

    The palace are always blindsided, bracing themselves and shaking their heads when it comes to Harry and Meghan. It’s clear H&M are going to continue living their lives and the palace can continue being outraged. Usually when you have a new job you don’t tell your old job what you are doing. Cry harder BP,KP.

  14. Laura D says:

    I don’t know! This seems more like an attack on William than H&M. It can’t be a coincidence that every article about the première mentions the Disaster Tour? This article is supposed to be slating H&M but, goes on to tell us how much they are loved by the Jamaicans. The article then reminds the reader (in great detail) how embarrassing and ineffectual William was when he visited the country.

    It’s also worth noting that senior sources were saying the première was not ideal and sounded disappointed that the palace couldn’t milk some of the positive coverage from the visit. Then finishes the article by implying that the Wales are responsible for the animosity between H&M and the rest of the family. IMHO this article was BP distancing itself from not being able to brief the RR about the visit and laying the blame firmly at the doors of KP.

    • JudyB says:

      What William SHOULD have done when the prime minister gave him this news, would have been to step forward with his hand extended and congratulated him, then gone on to give a brief speech about how the UK was ready to support them in becoming an independent nations, etc. etc. THAT is what a good diplomat will have done, and that action would have completely changed the tone of the meeting and resulted in a positive conclusion to the visit!! Instead, he just stood there like a dope, looking irritated and unhappy.

  15. Interested Gawker says:

    They are incensed that the movie premiere happened because it was a sensation that blunted KP’s latest attempts to smear Harry. They had no idea that it would happen and the fact that they are still whining over it when the rest of the world has moved on just proves William and his minions were rubbing their hands with glee over the lurid attempt to injure Harry’s professional relationships and now irritated because H&M ‘won’ the media cycle first.

    • roooth says:

      They went to all that trouble to make that Sandhurst gift store book, had a forward written that they claimed Willy wrote, included Willy as one of Sandhurst’s top graduates, excluded Harry – and then made a big deal out of how humiliated Harry would be by this – and just when they were salivating at the mere thought of embarrassing Harry, Harry & Meghan show up in Jamaica, and suddenly their gift book snub was seen for what it was – a small and insignificant failed attempt to hurt Harry. They looked like idiots. That’s why Jamaica pissed them off so much – they can’t touch Harry with their bullshit.

  16. Tessa says:

    Where is William by the way. Didn’t William have that misguided train tour of the UK during the pandemic. He would not listen and went on it anyway he and keen did not wear masks
    The outrage by the media over harry a d Meghan is a deflection from kate and her mysterious whereabouts.

  17. Eurydice says:

    Lol, I love how they think Harry is a political lightweight, but at the same time Meghan is going to run for office. And I think the palace was more blindsided by having two senior royals in the hospital and another planning to sit on his ass for the next 5 months.

  18. Tina says:

    These articles make me laugh. Such nonsense. I’m really excited for this next era for Harry and Meghan. There’s clearly stuff happening behind the scenes and they are connected to alot of powerful and interesting people. Manifesting good things for these two. The monarchy and the media really thought they would destroy them and now have to face the consequences of that.

  19. Izzy says:

    At this point, they should just stop using “blindsided” because of course the palace will be blindsided. Harry and Meghan have no communication with the palace about their daily lives and activities, which is the way they like it. Not being in the loop is not the same thing as being blindsided.

    • Proud Mary says:

      IKR? You are blindsided by something if you had the right to know and was not told. How can they use the same word pre- and post-sussexit?

  20. Cessily says:

    Meghan is an American citizen traveling with a United States passport and last I knew America has no issues seeing one of its citizens attending a movie Premiere and being gracious to the leaders of the country hosting the event. I hope Jamaican media and public figures continue to follow this and point out all this disinformation and dishonesty. Would love to see a mass exodus of the Caribbean from the Commonwealth.

  21. Just Jade says:

    Who knew going to a movie premiere could blindside everyone in that island. They so angry and hurt to see Harry & Meghan pictures on social media just like everyone else. The BM is mad that they lost their cash register and the palace is angry that they are finally being exposed without Harry & Meghan and it doesn’t look like things will get better. Oh happy day!

  22. MsIam says:

    The palaces eyebrows have been raised so much, they must be in the middle of their heads by now. Everything the Sussexes do, from going to sports events to a concert to a d@mn farmers market elicits this same stupid, hysterical response. Go get a life Unroyals! Stop trying to suck the life out of Harry and Meghan. And yes, I know things seem to be falling apart for the Lying Liars Who Lie, but that’s not the Sussexes fault.

  23. BayTampaBay says:

    “When it became clear that the Sussexes were not happy with their royal life in the UK, a plan was nearing completion for the couple to be stationed elsewhere in the Commonwealth.”

    Robert Lacey in his book “Battle of Brothers” clearly states that both Canada and South Africa said “NO!” to this idea when it was floated to them by the UK Foreign Office. This idea never came to fruition and this option was never offered to the Sussexes.

    Robert Lacy also states that it was the idea of QEII for the Sussexes to be stationed elsewhere in the Commonwealth.

  24. Over it says:

    Bitter, Bitter, Bitter and salty. Stay mad
    One love Jamaica.
    I want to build Mr. Holness a statue in honor of his savageness. It would say don’t sit , we’re moving on . 😃😃😃

  25. tamsin says:

    It’s not a good look to be blind-sided so often. It makes them look clueless.

  26. Mary Pester says:

    Dear rota and inside rats, please go fk yourselves. Where Harry and Megan go, when Harry and Megan go and when Harry and Megan go have fk all to do with any of you. You had your chance and blew it. But please do tell us what the kings thoughts are when he put the pictures of Willie and wonkys visit to Jamaica next to Harry and Megan’s visit to Jamaica??? Half in half out Charlie!? Sure looks good now doesn’t it! And do go thank your incandescent son for stuffing it all up.

  27. MikeB says:

    It doesn’t appear to have sunk in yet to the Times and those sources in the UK, H&M did not need to obtain their approval to go to Jamaica, they went as private citizens. The fact that the Jamaican prime minister was there was a coincidence. Another case of the RF and BM making a mountain out of a molehill.

  28. L4Frimaire says:

    The way this trip is still resonating and shook them up. They should be relieved they were a guest of the Paramount president rather than the Prime Minister of Jamaica. This trip reminded the UK of the Sussexes soft power, otherwise why be so upset about them attending a movie premiere?

  29. Bonsai Mountain says:

    Actually, if Harry decided to go to Jamaica because he saw how WIlliam and Kate insulted the country, a country Harry had much affection for, its shows great emotional sensitivity and excellent diplomacy skills on his part. Bravo!

  30. QuiteContrary says:

    Hey, The Times, you buried the lede: “They are free to do as they choose.”

    Of course, the Sussexes executing a foreign visit flawlessly is inconvenient for the palace. W&K look terrible in contrast.

  31. Mel says:

    What part of we “self-supporting, non-working ADULT royals” do they not understand? They don’t have to clear or report or ask permission to do anything. The salty, bitter tears…. shame…

  32. ohwell says:

    Harry and Meghan went to a movie premiere with some friends.

    That is it.

  33. kelleybelle says:

    Of course it did! Because they didn’t know about it beforehand and made no money on it. Ha.

  34. Elsa says:

    Here’s the deal. They don’t have to tell the UK what they are doing. They aren’t royals. Remember? As private citizens, they go where they want to go and meet with whomever they wish.

  35. Saucy&Sassy says:

    “A source close to the King suggested that Harry may well have accepted the invitation because he is oblivious to the political or familial sensitivities of being pictured with the Jamaican prime minister.”

    This is undoubtedly one reason why Jamaica wants total autonomy. They don’t want the Monarch or UK government to have anything to do with the Country. When you can’t have a movie premiere without the UK brf/bm losing their minds, it’s past time to cut that cord.

  36. AC says:

    All this tantrum because HM were invited by the CEO of Paramount studios and were embraced in Jamaica, in which WK were not.
    IMO I think they know they have totally lost their narratives around the world. In other words, People outside the UK aren’t believing their BS.
    It’s also interesting the US tabloids are now printing their own narratives . I’ve seen US tabs headlines this week on SM regarding Ks eating disorders to C favoring H over W now…😊
    I also saw on Twitter someone posted a photo which shows Netflix displaying a footnote on Suits – which read costarring MM before she married PH. If that was true, that was hilarious.
    I sometimes wonder if the BM has started to psst other people off lolZ..

  37. Lily says:

    I’m not surprised London and Montecito aren’t coordinating schedules and something like the Jamaican premiere happened. I would’ve just let the unfortunate timing roll off of my back if I were London. That’s the media for you. They cannot pass up a manufactured outrage opportunity for ratings.

    As for the fence photos, the optics are terrible but reality is the soccer field was fenced. Onlookers were there to see the royals and the Jamaican soccer star. The royals and the soccer star went over to shake hands and say hello to the fans. This photos is an example of how you can closely crop a photo to promote a narrative about colonialism. I don’t think anyone in that photo meant any harm or meant to imply that the participants were making a comment on oppression. I think it was a lot more innocent.

  38. BeanieBean says:

    So basically, they shouldn’t ever go to any place where William & Kate had previously made asses of themselves, is that correct?