The British government is really desperate to host the Invictus Games in 2027

Mid-February, a curious story popped up in the Times of London. Their sources claimed that Prince Harry planned to return to the UK for a visit in May, specifically to attend an Invictus Games ten-year anniversary service at St. Paul’s Cathedral. It was ten years ago that the inaugural Invictus Games were held in London, much to the dismay of Harry’s brother. Within that Times piece, “sources” dropped another interesting piece of news/gossip: the UK was making a big push to host another Invictus Games, this time in Birmingham in 2027. Johnny Mercer, the minister for veterans’ affairs and a veteran himself, is a big supporter of Invictus and Prince Harry. Mercer even attended the games in Dusseldorf last year, and I believe that Mercer is very much behind this push to bring the games back to the UK.

The Times piece also claimed that Harry was interested in Birmingham’s bid and likely to move in that direction when it came to announcing the location of the 2027 games later this year. Which I don’t believe – while Mercer’s intentions might be above-board, everyone else in Salt Island is setting a trap. They’re desperate to “force” Harry and Meghan to come back, even if it’s three years from now and just for a ten-day Invictus Games. Well, the British government is baiting the trap really well, and in their new budget, they’ve allocated £26 million in funding to a potential Birmingham games:

Again, while I buy that Mercer and many people in the British veterans/defense community have good intentions, this is still a trap. This is still the Tory government trying to lure the Sussexes into a position where they’ll be compromised or endangered. The Tories know their media handlers are desperate for all things Sussex, so this is their attempt to have Harry and Meghan served on a silver platter, plus three years of headlines about “the king bans Harry & Meghan from returning to Britain for Invictus” and “William claims sole ownership of Invictus!” All in all, I hope this heavy-handed bait is pushed aside and Harry and the Invictus team choose another country. Washington, DC has bid for the games too.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

108 Responses to “The British government is really desperate to host the Invictus Games in 2027”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Water Lilly says:

    Cue Admiral Ackbar: It’s a trap!

    • Mel says:

      Exactly! Please don’t fall for it Harry! I’m kind of angry they are even daring to try to make a bid for it after they ignored their own veterans participating last year. That lack of support from everyone in the UK when the royals are supposedly heads of the military just to spite Harry was atrocious.

    • I believe it’s a trap for some over there. I don’t believe Harry is really interested in bringing it there because he has no security . That’s the trap. Harry is a smart guy he won’t go there and bring Megan because it won’t be safe. It’s really weird how hard they are pushing. I hope another country wins their bid for Invictus.

    • seaflower says:

      My first thoughts too.

    • B says:

      Definitely a trap @water lily but much like when the Sussexes were working for the firm everyone has different motivations. The veteran and military communities love Harry and would want this in the UK. Certain sectors of government would love the tourism money this would bring in. BUT the press, courtiers, and senior members of the firm would do everything they could to sabotage the Invictus Games. They don’t care about larger issues likes the mental health of wounded veterans, the image of Brand Britain on the global stage, or the positive impact on the economy. They just want to hurt Harry and Meghan.

    • Caribbean says:

      MANY TRAPS, everywhere, all at once…
      Trap for Harry and Meghan
      Trap for Harry to leave Meghan for DAYS if she is not comfortable going.
      Trap so Meghan does not go, therefore, does not do speeches etc. as Levin(?) wants.
      Trap for more pictures and videos and stories (on their doorstep) to comment on and ‘analyze’
      Trap to legitimately interview people about Meghan and Harry
      Trap to say who snubbed Harry and Meghan
      Trap to make Harry and Meghan look bad, if England Invictus is not well prepared…Blame…
      Trap to insert the unRoyals into Invictus
      SO MANY TRAPS…Harry, GET OUT!

      • MelodyM says:

        And of course, not winning the bid is also a trap for Harry and Meghan. It will be all ‘Harry is so petty, he is punishing the british vets by not allowing IG to come to Britain because he’s angry at his family.’ Still, that’s easier to deal with than going there without the security that has been denied them.

  2. Immaculate Misconception says:

    I pray they stay the hell away from that godforsaken little place.

  3. equality says:

    If they have to decide now hopefully they nix DC on the off-chance there is a terrible president. On the other hand, either place might seriously irk some people so would be a potential win from that point of view. I would think that the UK would have to make some serious agreements regarding security and media to ever have a chance.

    • Christine says:

      S Korea has always been my dream choice, but damn. They could not be in a better position. Get ‘er done, SK!!!

      • Michael P Cowtan says:

        My vote, for what it is worth, is S Korea. They are really anxious to hold the games, and it would be great to see it in Asia. Lets make it truly worldwide

  4. Kittenmom says:

    Washington DC!! I might actually have a shot of going if this happens. I’m sure that depends on the outcome of this election tho….🫣

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I would not want to subject H&M to the 🍊🤡 for ten days. And we know he hates them so he would surely cause problems. On the other hand, if the 🍊🤡 is president in 2027, the Invictus Games will be the least of our problems.

    • The outcome of this election will be like the outcome of every single election held since a woman’s right to choose went back on the ballot.

      I am not sure if the republican party will ever be able to come back from the defeat they will be handed in Nov.

      Not that it bothers me…

      • JanetDR says:

        Exactly right! They will need to rebrand. No way is that orange 💩 gibbon getting in again.

      • McGee says:

        Gentle reminder:
        Trump got in in 2016 without a majority of the popular vote; and since that time nefarious changes have been out in place to increase obstacles against the Will of the People having their outcome. MAGA populates more state election positions, etc.

        It’s quite possible for him to win. Now is the time to work, reach out, strategize and donate.

      • Every single election where a woman’s right to chose has been on the ballot since the reversal of Roe vs. Wade has ended in not only the right to choose affirmed, but also all democratic seats held and some previously thought safe republican seats lost to democratic challengers.

        For every racist Magat there are 10 times more young people of child bearing age.

        This November will be the death of the republican party and I am here for it.

        The racist old white men got in bed with the misogynist evangelicals.

        This IS the FO part of FAFO

  5. Sarah says:

    I keep seeing random stories about Harry pressuring Meghan to come for the May thing. How it’s causing problems in their marriage. How they will come to “outshine” Kate, on and on. I hope the games go elsewhere.

    • Yup, Me says:

      What trash are you reading?

      • sarah says:

        Oh gosh I don’t even know. Random content that my Apple news feeds me as I doze off at night? I’ve definitely seen it in more than one tabloid. It’s like they’ve created this whole little story off of his vague comment that illness can bring families together. It’s definitely more fanfic than journalism.

      • Mairzy Doats says:

        A search for “Harry & Meghan” in the most common search engine news will yield a list of “Expert Says…” and “H&M warned…” ridiculous headlines. No need to click to read — the headlines are “informative” enough.

    • Caribbean says:

      Any visible person can outshine Kate right now.

  6. s808 says:

    I hope they lose 😁 My vote is still for South Korea. DC would be fine too.

    • Lady Esther says:

      Same. South Korea first choice, that would be awesome. Washington DC, also great, on American soil yay ! and the American response and press attention would be second to none. Anything but Salty Isle!

      • Laurac says:

        Not if Trump is president…

      • MinorityReport says:

        Even if Trump is president, republicans have built their platform around love of the military and veterans for 20+ years. Trump might talk a little, but wouldn’t risk alienating the “support our troops” crowd.

      • Jais says:

        Umm, trump literally called some of the troops losers and his base was still cool with it.

      • sarah says:

        @minorityreport if he gets in again, he isn’t going to leave until he’s carried out. He surely doesn’t care about alienating anybody. I think he would likely demand the games feature him in some way and when they refuse he ‘cancels’ it. Ugh now I have a stomachache

      • Jaded says:

        Trump has repeatedly ignored injured veterans, calling them losers and suckers, and has asked that wounded veterans be kept out of military parades. He said, about McCain upon his death…‘We’re not going to support that loser’s funeral,’ and he became furious, according to witnesses, when he saw flags lowered to half-staff. ‘What the f— are we doing that for? Guy was a f—ing loser,’ the president told aides.”

    • Lawrenceville says:

      Ha ha, ha, ha, ha, very, very funny. That imbecile Sunak and his Tory govt and minions sure have the chutzpah. Sunak and his govt made a conscious decision to publicly disrespect and humiliate the British vets last year when they went to Dusseldorf, not even a tweet to wish them well, because he wanted to please the BaRF. Then he leaked how he had persuaded the Bidens to not attend the IG in Dusseldorf nor give the Sussexes any rides from to the UK etc. queen’s funeral. And to add salt to injury, the Tory govt chose to have their vets stuffed into a bus…a friggin bus, for the trip to Dusseldorf on a bus. Vets with multiple amputations etc, severe body and emotional injuries, etc were all stuffed in a bus because Sunak and his minions cared zero. Now they want to host IGM? No sir thank you very much i hope they lose the bid spectacularly. I want SK to win. Go South Korea,

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Lawrenceville, iirc the UK didn’t do anything when sending their Vets off to NL either. The British Ambassador to NL made the effort to receive them. This isn’t just a one off, and for them to come out now and want the games there? There are only two reasons I can think of that that is the case. They want Harry (and Meghan) in the country to abuse–and probably without security, and they want the economic boost. So … where do the Vets come into that?

  7. ElleF says:

    Maybe the MOD is pulling Willy’s chain here, after being forced to delete their information that Kate would attend trooping?

    • Flower says:

      I think there is some friction between the MoD and William. It could be because they have historically shown Harry favour and William may feel uneasy with that.

      We’ve seen before how William has forced common friends to pick a side very publicly or risk being cut off.

      It could be that the MoD are trying to drive it home that they don’t care about Williams differences with his brother. William has no executive powers so he actually has to defer to them.

  8. Alexandria says:

    The royals of other host countries supported the events and interacted with HM. The British royals can’t even support them as family. This is a joke. UK establishment is a joke. UK media are clowns. And the attacks won’t cease. There will be more fake reports and stupid allegations about where the funding went to and snubs from the Windsors. Find your own Harry and IG!

    • HeatherC says:

      It’s not only that. The royals of other countries also publicly support their athletes. BRF couldn’t be bothered to do even a lukewarm tweet or IG post “good luck UK Invictus team” or see them off. They’ve decided with their whole chests to disrespect their veteran community because Harry can’t and won’t be called to heel.

      • Alexandria says:

        And technically a royal is their commander in chief but he and his heir can’t be arsed to remain professional and support UK army veterans. Of course they will give themselves fake medals anytime. Grifters.

  9. sevenblue says:

    I agree, this is mostly for tabloids’ benefit. They are losing money left and right. I am sure they are gonna demand full access to H&M if the games are held there. Also, they hosted before, why should they host again? I hope, they choose one that didn’t host the games before.

  10. aquarius64 says:

    The toxic UK media should be a disqualified for the UK to host IG. Charles as commander in chief didn’t support the vets in Düsseldorf. The Windsor family feud will front and center not the vets. BP and KP will be jockeying for position to take IG a way from Harry.

    • Shawna says:

      “The Windsor family feud will front and center not the vets. ” Good point. It would be a massive shame.

    • equality says:

      If it were in their country and they failed to support, how embarrassing would that be for them? They would be forced to grit their teeth and participate or expose themselves as not really caring.

    • Jais says:

      Hard agree. The vibe would be toxic with nasty media headlines and RF shunning. The event should be about celebrating the veterans and they’d be surrounded by toxicity. It should be an absolute no-go before even considering the security situation.

    • Becks1 says:

      Also, IG refuses to give press credentials to a lot of the tabloids, and I’m sure that and security are part of any deal for IG to pick a country.

      For most countries, the security isn’t an issue because of course you provide security for someone like Harry, and no country wants to be the country where something happened to Harry and Meghan because of the lack of security. See NYC’s response after the car chase in May.

      But the UK seems to feel differently……

      • Lady D says:

        Did they not make it clear to Harry that he was to give 30 days notice in order to arrange security for him when visiting the UK? That will never work for him during Invictus. He comes and goes non-stop during the games, and not always on a schedule. If I was him I would be loud and clear that security is why it can’t be in Britain. Thank you Edward Young. (I think that’s the slimeball’s name)

    • Christine says:

      It wasn’t just Dusseldorf, the left behind royals also gave zero acknowledgement to the athletes in The Hague.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Christine, I said as much above before I saw your comment. It has been clear to me that the Vets in the UK are NOT appreciated at all. Then to have the UK submit a bid? Riiiiiiiiight.

  11. Hanna says:

    Why oh why do they want to host. They refused to give Harry security mocked Harry and Meghan daily, so they can continue to mock them? They had to ride a bus 10hrs for the British vets to get to the IG before not even give them a plane rides. Give it to S KOREA please.

    • Flower says:

      It could be a deal between the two parties i.e. Harry offers them up Invictus to save the UK from embarrassment and in return H&M get security back on UK soil.

      Personally if I were Meghan, I would refuse to come and especially refuse to bring my children.

      • one of the marys says:

        I was thinking the same thing, would meghan even attend?

      • Kingston says:

        Fortunately, Meghan is one of one; the only one. So no one has to imagine if they were Meghan what they would do, if they really want to know what SHE would do. If anyone wants to know what Meghan would do, they need only look at what she and her husband have said and done:

        “We are a team, so whatever we have to tackle, we’ll always be together as a team’

        “Harry and I, we’re like salt and pepper. We always move together.”

        This couple doesnt make unilateral decisions. So there will be no: “refuse to bring HER children….”

        Perhaps the uk and its supporters would be best served if they focused on the viability of the Commonwealth Games and take their red eyes of Invictus.

  12. Jay says:

    There does seem to be a contingent of the Tory government that rightly wants to host Invictus, and all of the attention and investment that comes with it, despite the Windsors’ insistence that Harry and Meghan should never be allowed in the UK again. Seems like TOB’s conservative allies don’t back him completely, because if Invictus comes back to the UK, he will have to either schedule a foreign tour that summer or grit his teeth and go, trying to avoid events with his brother. But he’ll be shown up – badly.

    This is the same royal family that can’t even be bothered to publicly wish the British Invictus team well. It’s also the same government that has allowed RAVEC and the royals to use taxpayer-funded security to manipulate the Sussexes. That would be a deal breaker for me – if Harry and Meghan can’t safely attend the games, then this bid can go kick rocks.

    • Relam says:

      Maybe only Harry will attend. He has already set a precedent by attending events in the UK alone.

      • Feeshalori says:

        I don’t think that would happen with the IG, Meghan seems to be very much a part of it and the participants love to see her. I hope he chooses any location other than London or DC depending on our election outcome.

    • Rnot says:

      But the Tories are very unlikely to be running the government in 2027.

  13. Celine says:

    They wouldn’t go ahead if Harry didn’t give them his permission. Why do people forget that Harry wants to spend his time in the UK? Anyway, we are talking about an event that is three years away. No one knows what will happen at that time. Maybe Charles wouldn’t even be the king by then….

    • Christine says:

      How would that be better?

    • WiththeAmerican says:

      What gives you the idea that Harry wants to spend his time there? Curious because it seems like he’s always flying in for business and then fleeing asap.

      • Celine says:

        Have you read Spare or watched his interviews? He is literally fighting for security in the UK. He always says that the UK is his home and is central to the heritage of his children. He rarely travels there because he is literally homeless in the UK with no home or security. Let’s see what would happen if Harry got proper security and bought his own house in the UK.

      • WiththeAmerican says:

        Céline, i have done both. I understand why he’s fighting for his security, and that he sees UK as his home of origin, but given that his own wife and children aren’t safe there, he doesn’t seem like he wants to live there.

        Wanting the right for security to be established doesn’t equal wanting to live there or spend a lot of time there, imo. After all, even with security, the media drove his wife to unaliving thoughts.

        He said on his most recent interview that California feels like home now.

      • Not a Subject says:

        He had said repeatedly and wrote about it that he’d love to have a second home in the UK so his children can know their heritage and that the UK will always be his home. I mean, American here, and he likes our country, but he is a Prince of the UK – like a bald eagle or west point or something. He literally is of a heritage that symbolizes much of that country’s history. He’s not turning his back – just demanding respect.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        @WiththeAmerican, so you know, there are apparently posters who know more about what Harry said and meant, than most of us who have read & watched his interviews. A lot of us can actually reference exact passages from SPARE and share links to Harry’s actual words in interviews (the latest ABC special covered something being discussed).

        Yes, Harry has discussed wanting to be able to go back with his children and it’s part of their heritage. He’s been fighting to pay for his own security so they could visit. Safely. If someone could point out where he said he wants to spend his time(not just visit) and live there, please share. In the Michael Strahan interview he covered why it’s not possible. The recent ABC special covered/repeated it. At the time of SPARE’s release, the Sussexes did have a 2nd home. Frogmore Cottage. Then it was yanked away. The idea Harry is homeless in the UK is entertaining at best.

        He & Meghan have plenty of people that will welcome them into their homes on their large estates and consider the Sussexes family. And, they don’t have to worry about creepy courtiers lurking about. Personally don’t believe H has been staying in hotels during his dine and dash stops in the UK.

        Hope the IG are not held in the UK in 2027.

    • Lady D says:

      @Celine, An event the press will spend the next three years maligning and destroying, because they own both the govt. and the royal family?
      An event in the place the RF said he would never be guaranteed security other than on their say-so?
      Three years of nonstop vicious press on them, from every outlet in the country, barring one to ten papers? Three years of nonstop attacks on people who matter to the Sussex’s?
      This is not great for the Montecito royals. They still think Harry’s dim.

      • Polo says:

        I feel like people are get caught up in the family aspect and not realizing that this is also a non profit organization. The majority of where they go will depend in funding for the games as well as how the athletes will be taken care of.
        South Korea isn’t involved for 2027. It’s down to Washington or Birmingham. Whichever city provides the most resources for the games and athletes will most likely win but especially FINANCING!
        If the UK is providing 26 million and another country is only giving 10. If it makes sense theyll go with what’s the best option.
        I think most people hope they stay in the states to avoid the onslaught of hate the British media will surely provide.

      • sevenblue says:

        @Polo, I agree with you in terms of financing. However, some part of the Invictus is press: showing the importance of the games for the veterans. I am sure they are gonna get global press over there, but the main press will be the local one, who is gonna use every opportunity to find and analyze every little thing H&M do, then to turn it into a scandal. They are gonna have full freedom on their own country to be as vicious as possible. I can’t imagine the stress it will create on the organizers, volunteers.

  14. SarahCS says:

    The Tories are desperate for anything they can claim that’s not a burning pile of excrement ahead of the election that will take place this year (see also the latest under-funded tax cuts when councils are going bankrupt and stopping even essential services). Of course they will throw money at this.

    • Chrissie says:

      There’s an election at the end of the year in the UK and the Tories are expected to lose badly. The new government should hopefully be Labour, more like the Democrats politically. That may help. I think the key will be the Royals attitude and Harry’s security. If the Royals continue to fail to actively support the UK team, will not acknowledge Harry as Patron and Harry cannot get protection and secure accommodation when he is in the UK. Then I think it’s a no go.

    • ML says:

      Sigh, I’m divided on this because I believe that British veterans should be able to enjoy Invictus on home soil again. Just in case this needs to be said, some Brits genuinely love and support Harry (and even Meghan)! On the other hand, I don’t believe that the RF is cheerfully awaiting H&M or IG. They’re salty, jealous, and they’ve used the BM to make it a dangerous place for H&M.

  15. Cessily says:

    I hope they choose very wisely this is a disaster waiting to happen.

  16. cazzie says:

    We have a General Election happening way before then, and regardless of the way you vote in the Uk, it seems pretty certain that the Tories will NOT be the Government of the day in 2027! Even if it does happen, Id say the toxic media will be fully occupied in trying to keep just their rightwing owners in business without having time to worry about the Royals too. Besides, Harry as founding Patron has a huge amount of influence over who will host. He isnt just a figurehead, and I feel would like to let those countries who havent yet hosted have a fair crack at the whip. I’d be onboard for South Korea too though by the way!

  17. Mads says:

    Birmingham Council is effectively bankrupt and has just cut £300 million from its spending budget and raising council tax (property tax) by 21%. I can’t see how the city can afford the Invictus Games even with the £26 million allocated by the government for a bidding process. Personally, I hope it doesn’t come here, too much negativity with the press, Mr Incandescent et al.

    • AmB says:

      £26M for “bidding process” = £26M for consultants to make PowerPoints. Just sayin’.

  18. SussexWatcher says:

    Nope and no way. This is – as usual – clout chasing by using Harry and/or Meghan’s names. They just think this is still 2015 where they can bully Harry into doing what they want simply by reporting it publicly.

    Harry isn’t bringing his family back into that country when it isn’t safe. And the courts just said that they don’t care about the safety of Harry or his family. So I just can’t imagine Harry would then “reward” the UK by allowing the Games to be held there. And yes, I know he’s not the only one making the decision but would the IG board put the founder (and family) in an unsafe position? I seriously doubt it.

    The UK (parts of it) recognizes what they’ve lost by targeting the Sussexes the way they did and now the regrets have set in. FAFO.

  19. Maxine Branch says:

    As previously mentioned, this is an expensive trap. Hope Harry and the IG Committee see this for what it is. The IG are designed for veterans rehabilitation not for Windsor nonsense. Stay away Harry.

    • Jules57 says:

      I’m 10000% sure you’re way smarter than Harry who, according to so many here, is so clueless he’d absolutely fall into any basic trap. Thank God he has you. I’m sure he needs help crossing the road too.

  20. Just Jade says:

    How is that going to work if the founder and his family don’t have protection to attend the event. Are they trying to take IG from Prince Harry the same way they did his military patronage?

    • Christine says:

      Invictus was set up like Sentebale, it has never been a royal patronage. Harry created it. I know the derangers love to believe that some big hand in the sky can take Invictus and give it to William, but that’s completely false.

  21. Tara says:

    Well, trap – for sure. The end of their freedom and independence. Just as you said, Kaiser, it would be used against them from the moment they get a go.
    I also had a thought, if this is an attempt to limit the reach of Invictus? Like closing a circle? Dont do it Harry. Stay away

  22. Carmen says:

    Absolutely not. The U.K. doesn’t deserve the Games.

  23. olivia says:

    The British government should first spend money and effort into housing and feeding the homeless veterans of Britain that are dying on the streets instead. This is shameful.

  24. Debbie says:

    I also think this is a way to interject more politics and royal drama into the games and to use veterans as a backdrop. While I agree that the Minister of Defense may be sincere in his intentions, a “yes” for the UK in 2027 would just benefit the BM and the BRF, as a close second, by having them jockeying for headlines at the games and the Sussexes’ expense.

    • Christine says:

      This is going to be interesting to watch. It directly benefits the British media for Invictus to be held in the U.K., so if they are smart, they will cut all of the endless smears, and start reporting on Harry and Meghan fairly. That will cause their palace masters to yank their chains, because the only person who absolutely won’t want to see Invictus in the U.K. is their lazy heir.

      I believe the MoD is sincere, which makes me feel bad for them. I can’t really imagine having to endlessly suck up to bullies and toddlers.

  25. Chantal1 says:

    The absolute nerve!! Apparently that judge didn’t get the memo…

    The toxic BM and the toxic govt and BRF with their RAVEC bs should be automatic disqualifiers. It’s not just the Sussexes privacy and safety that should be of great concern but also that of IG organizers, sponsors and participants and their families. Not to mention the blatant disrespect, and the numerous and inevitable leaks and attempts to sabotage it and the Sussexes. I said in another post that if I were Harry, I’d make sure that the UK never won a bid to host the IGs. I really hate how the British vets/participants have repeatedly been mistreated and ignored by C-Rex and the RF, and the UK govt after working so hard.

  26. MinorityReport says:

    I know Harry will ultimately do what’s best for the Games because he’s pragmatic and cares about vets more than he cares about how things affect him personally. If it were me? Invictus wouldn’t be held on that island while I draw breath on this earth.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      This, 100%. I trust Harry to make the right choice for the vets of Invictus. He always puts them first — a concept that his family of origin will never understand.

  27. Amy Bee says:

    With no royal wedding or big event in the near future, this is definitely the Tory Government aiding the British press’ desperation for to have Harry and Meghan back in the UK

  28. Laura D says:

    As much as I would love the games to be held over here in the UK I agree with the reasons given by other posters as why Harry (and Meghan) should not touch this offer with a 10 foot barge poll. It’s also worth remembering there is complete radio silence on which country will be hosting the Commonwealth Games. I may be wrong but, hasn’t the deadline for bids passed? IMHO the BRF, RR and the government are using this bid for the Invictus Games to take away attention from their failed attempt at finding a country willing to host the Commonwealth Games.

    • Lady D says:

      There are no CW games this year? The queen has been gone for half a year and everything is crumbling. Couldn’t happen to a nicer RF.

      • Jaded says:

        QEII died in Sept. 2022 so she’s been gone a year and a half. However the f*ckups since she passed have been legendary and yes, it couldn’t happen to a nicer RF.

      • Lady D says:

        Thanks, Jaded. It doesn’t seem like it’s been that long already.

    • Rnot says:

      The 2026 Commonwealth Games are a complete shambles. They don’t have a host. Victoria Australia won the bid but then backed out citing budget increases (and paid $250 million to get out of the deal!) No one else has stepped forward to host. Initially the organizers were talking about delaying it until 2027, but now they’re talking about breaking it up into smaller individual sport championships. Alberta Canada was bidding for 2030 but they pulled out too. I think they’re done.

  29. Eurydice says:

    A lot of things can happen in the world in the next 3 years – there’s no point in guessing. The foundation should choose the venue that best suits the mission and the Games. I think it would be better to have the Games be more global and go somewhere other than Europe and North America.

  30. Tennyson says:

    The irony is that I just finished here in the UK a survey on YouGov about International & national games and competitions, asking us to rate their popularity etc.
    Anyway, a list of 20 questions about 59 organisations, and guess what? Invictus Games wasn’t amongst that list, meaning next the Gutter Press will be able to say they aren’t popular!

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Tennyson, that’s hilarious! So, the UK is bidding to have something but they don’t even want to know if it’s something people want to see? That makes perfect sense. NOT!

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      I love that you shared that info @Tennyson. Tells/substantiates a lot of things like the BM/BRF pay for these polls. If the UK doesn’t get the bid-the BM can bleat on how no one was interested. Once again, not a good look to not support veterans for the UK/BRF.

  31. Flower says:

    Starmer/ Labour will be AT LEASE two years into power by 2027, so the Tories will not get to shape the narrative. However Starmer is effectively Tory lite so the right leaning faction of the civil service (whom have also served in the Royal households) will have their knives out.

    That said I still think this is a trap and likely Chuckles conniving with certain actors to force Harry, Meghan and their children back onto UK soil to make him look good. I agree that they also want their association back with Invictus. That said I cannot see William getting his mitts on Invictus – the association with Harry is now just too strong and thankfully the branding has been on point about that from day 1. The risk is that veterans would reduce their participation because a huge part of the games is the comradery and community spirit – I do not see William being able to replicate that.

    William needs a win, but this is not it. He needs to find his angle with Earth Sh!t. Problem is, it’s hard to sell something you’re not really passionate about.

    I do however think that Harry would like to do something for UK veterans who clearly love and adore him. So it;s not outlandish for Harry to wish to return to the UK.

    The UK media must be beside themselves already carving up the stories between them.

  32. BlueNailsBetty says:

    I wish IG would come to Austin. The competitors would have a great time and be supported by the locals.

    Back to reality: I hope South Korea gets chosen.

  33. Kelsey says:

    DC has an IG bid?!?!?!

    OMG, as a VA resident, I would zoom three hours north so fast LOL. USA! USA! LET’S GOOOOOOOO!

  34. Kokiri says:

    True to form, Harry will choose what is best for the veterans & the games.
    If that means London, he will go.
    Meghan will go, as per usual, if only for a few days.
    The children will stay in the US, safe.

    • booboocita says:

      Yep. Harry would go (should the Birmingham bid be approved), and Meghan might go (I personally think she wouldn’t, and that the next time she goes to the UK would be Chucky Boy’s funeral, if even that), but no way this couple exposes those darling children to the disgusting rota rats.

  35. aquarius64 says:

    The IG Foundation selects the host city so it maybe a vote by committee. Harry may not have the final say, just an equal vote. Also by going to the UK any hiccups along the way would be blamed on Harry are the narrative would be IG should be under the control of the BRF.

  36. mary Pester says:

    A message to the UK government from a British veteran. Dear all, go fk yourselves. You don’t get to ignore invictus, shove amputee veterans on a bus, don’t bother to wish them luck, cut veterans help both mental and financial. You don’t get to break the veterans covenant and expect us to allow invictus to be soiled on your shores!!! How fking dare you. You could have stopped all the disgusting stories about harry and meghan, just like his father could. You could have sensured the daily Mirror for that disgusting front page today, but no, your quiet.
    So the cloak of respectfulness will never EVER sit on any UK governments shoulders while they behave in this way. The sounds of Invictus veterans supporting Harry, Megan, and each other, will never be shouted in any British arena, Harry is far more intelligent than any of you, you won’t trap him and his family, you won’t get to steel invictus and hand it to William who will destroy it within 6 months or minutes. So dream on wankers and tune your televisions into Washington or south Korea. It ain’t happening in the UK.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Mary Pester, I’ve paid attention to the lack of attention the brf and UK government have paid the Veterans during the last two IG. I’ve been completely horrified by their negligence to the people who have served their country. I do know that I’ve always had a soft sport for Military service members whether active or vet. I want you to know I’ve been rooting for the UK IG teams at the Games. I have no doubt that there are so many more besides me who are doing the same. We’ve haven’t forgotten any of you. Please believe that.

      • mary Pester says:

        @saucy&sassy, thank you Saucy, if you could see some of the conditions our SERVING troops have to live in you would be horrified, and veterans can’t even get a roof over their heads half the time!!!

  37. sid2 says:

    IG at Birmingham is a “No” for me. First of, let’s see if KC will still be alive 3 years on. Imagine, worst case scenario, Harry is committed to this plan and William is king. It’ll be nothing less than sabotage.

    • Libra says:

      Agree@sid2_ William will be the face of the U.K. and attempt a takeover of Invictus. He controls the press and will use them against Harry. William has always wanted Invictus as his own.

  38. phlyfiremama says:

    ONLY so they can tear Harry down. Don’t fall for it!!