Emily Blunt and Ryan Gosling spent much of the past fortnight promoting The Fall Guy, a big-budget action-comedy. The production cost $130 million… and the film opened with $25 million domestically, and $36.9 million internationally. I find that respectable and the film will probably make a tidy profit, all told. But these days, studios expect to make up their costs on the opening weekend, so these numbers are not being well-received. I do wonder if it’s a promotional issue though – would you say that Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt really got out there and hustled like crazy for the film? I’m not sure. Anyway, here’s a leftover interview from Emily – she appeared on The Howard Stern Show last week, and she spoke about the difference between having chemistry on-screen versus off-screen.
Emily Blunt is getting candid about what happens when an actor doesn’t quite mesh with a castmate — especially filming romantic scenes. During an appearance on The Howard Stern Show on April 30, the British actress, 41, opened up about how she builds chemistry with her fellow actors for each of her movies. She revealed to host Howard Stern that on multiple occasions, “I’ve had chemistry with people I haven’t liked.”
When Stern, 70, came right out and asked her, “Who?” Blunt responded simply, “I’m not gonna tell you.”
“I have had chemistry with people who… I have not had a good time working with them,” she said, still refusing to reveal any names. “Sometimes it’s a strange thing. Sometimes you could have a rapport that’s really effortless, but it doesn’t translate onscreen. Chemistry is this strange thing. It’s an ethereal thing that you can’t really bottle up and buy or sell. It’s like there or it’s not. It’s just easier when you have a natural rapport with someone.”
Blunt also spoke about some tactics she uses to find chemistry with a costar when there isn’t much — such as attempting to find something she likes about her fellow actor in order to try and create a better rapport on camera.
“I’ve got to find something I love about everybody. I have to find something … Even if it’s one thing,” she told Stern. “It might be that they have a nice laugh or I like how they speak to people. They’re polite. I mean, it might be something random,” she continued. “But find something you love about that person or something you love about them as the character and then kind of lean into that.”
Despite her attempts to spark chemistry between her and her romantic counterpart’s characters, Blunt said that some moments on set have been downright gross.
“Have you wanted to throw up?” Stern asked Blunt about kissing a fellow actor on set, to which she replied: “Absolutely. Absolutely. I wouldn’t say it’s sort of extreme loathing, but I’ve definitely not enjoyed some of it,” she added.
I don’t even think of Emily as an actress known for being a romantic lead or known for having chemistry with her costars. She absolutely has chemistry with actors off-screen, out in the real world, but she’s right that it doesn’t always translate on-screen. Like, she and Cillian Murphy had nothing between them in Oppenheimer and that really took me out of the film for a moment – they seemed so poorly matched and SHE seemed so miscast. She’s absolutely right about actors having hot chemistry on screen when they don’t get along in real life too, that happens all the time.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
Like the last season of Downton, & they tried to make us buy Lady Mary falling hard for the car guy.
He was so bad, so cringe, zero chemistry. Especially after Matthew! Dan Stevens was so so good.
Anyway. I don’t care for her, if I ever really did. Also, while I wish she’d name names, I know why she doesn’t. But it makes for a flat story.
I would bet she wanted to throw up after kissing Benicio del Toro in the movie The Wolfman. I did not feel any chemistry between them when I watched the movie.
@Kokiri, you should watch Leap Year with Matthew Goode (the car Guy from Downton Abbey) and Amy Addams because he has way more chemistry with her than with Michelle Dockery. I don’t think she has much chemistry with any of the other guys they tried to pair her up with in DA after Matthew anyway.
Agreed, @Lau! Leap Year is such a fun rom com, and Goode was so much more compelling as a romantic lead.
@KOKIRI That’s not Matthew Goode’s fault. He is a very good actor & always has chemistry with his co-stars, male or female in films or TV programs. It’s Michelle & the writer’s fault. Lady Mary was not a likeable character & she didn’t grow emotionally with time passing. Matthew did good in Dowton.
My guess is Tom Cruise is one of those co-stars. They had pretty decent chemistry on-screen. But he’s a PITA to work with. Especially when it comes to his female co-stars
The more interviews with Emily I read, the more I think she’s a shitty person. I don’t know maybe she just doesn’t come across that well? I just remember that other interview where she was trashing living in New York.
I think she and John K have absolutely zero chemistry. Whenever I see them they look like strangers standing next to one another. By all accounts, they seem happy but I can’t see it.
(ETA: Obviously my opinion as a random commenter doesn’t matter and I hope they live happily ever after.)
She didn’t actually say she wanted to throw up, those words were put into her mouth by the interviewer in the form of a question.
I just hate this recipe for interviews where they give them an answer right in the question they’re asking. I see it with the tennis interviews all the time .. How elated are you to win? How relieved are you that you saved those match points? The interviewee ends up agreeing but they didn’t actually SAY relieved or happy or what have you.
Sorry drives me NUTS. It’s just so lazy.
Back to the original story, I never really think about them having to kiss and have sex scenes with people they can’t stand .. it’s kind of gross isn’t it?
But it’s the job. There’s definitely a line when there is harassment or bad behavior, but just not liking the person you are acting opposite is a you problem to deal with.
It’s funny I was just reading about The Fall Guy’s under performance at the box office and all I could think was Emily Blunt is not a guarantee of a good movie. She really should start just turning down movies if there are scenes in the movie that she doesn’t want to do. It can’t be just for the money at this point.
Didn’t she and the big pebble do a movie together? They acted like they liked each other but was it real?
Yeah, “throw up” was Howard Stern’s phrasing, but she did agree. It’s not quite the same as saying she wanted to throw up but she should have said, “Not throw up but I haven’t enjoyed some of it.”
She and Joseph Gordon-Levitt were a pretty odd on-screen couple. Can’t remember if she kissed Tom Hanks in Charlie Wilson’s War but that pairing was gross to watch.
I’d be grossed out if I had to kiss a whole bunch of men who weren’t my partners, even if they’re showbiz people and supposedly attractive.
I saw this last night and went in expecting to be entertained only to find it even better than I hoped. We found it delightfully ludicrous and tounge in cheek and we giggled throughout; so much fun. We also agreed we’d watch the final version of the film they’re making in this film if that was released.
Also, if you go stay for the credits as there’s an extra scene.