Nicholas Galitzine: ‘I identify as a straight man’ & feel guilt about taking gay roles

I’ve now seen Nicholas Galitzine in Red, White & Royal Blue and The Idea of You. I really like him! He’s incredibly talented. I was more into The Idea of You because it worked surprisingly well as a straight romance, and both Galitzine and Anne Hathaway were truly doing great work in it. People deride the idea of “actors having chemistry” or “portraying a genuine romance on-screen,” but it’s f–king hard and Anne and Nicholas did a great job. They were equal in that if one of them had struck a false note or given a wink to the camera, the whole thing would have fallen apart. So much hinged on Galitzine’s portrayal of a fictionalized Harry Styles and he really delivered a vulnerable and nuanced romantic co-lead. Anyway, Galitzine covered a recent issue of British GQ. It’s a traditional “meet this hot actor on the rise” profile, but considering I knew very little about him, I enjoyed it and learned some stuff about him.

He’s taken work he didn’t love just to further his career: “I’ve had to cut my teeth on a lot of projects, which… I find the result of them, admittedly, maybe not great. But for me, it was always, OK, this job won’t take me from point A to Z, but it is at least pushing me in the right direction?” He’s also quick to point out what people don’t realise about those easily derided teen films: “To create chemistry and charm on screen, oftentimes not necessarily having the most lively script to work with, is a skill in itself.”

Modern masculinity: He’s fascinated by men who are “trapped” by masculinity, because he felt the same for a long time. “I was a very scared young man. And I think a lot of men are really scared. I think they’re scared of their own mortality. I think they’re scared of being found out. There’s this notion in masculinity that you have to be in control and certain of everything.”

His insecurities: Galitzine lists his insecurities matter-of-factly: the way he used to be “disgusted in some ways” by his own face; his cheekbones, brows, sunken eyes, “rugby-player thighs” and “big arse”; how people comment online about the dark bags under his eyes, saying he needs to get some sleep.

On people conflating him with his characters: “I am Nick, and I’m not my role,” he says. But surely he’s had to deal with people conflating him with his characters? “I think I have. I identify as a straight man, but I have been a part of some incredible queer stories. I felt a sense of uncertainty sometimes about whether I’m taking up someone’s space, and perhaps guilt. At the same time, I see those characters as not solely their sexuality.”

The sex scenes in ‘The Idea of You’: “You don’t see any bare body parts, you don’t get thrusting. Hayes is kind of worshipping her. That aftercare scene was so sexy. Someone asked me once when I feel most loving, and not to be too crass, but it can sometimes be after sex, because that’s when you shed all your vulnerabilities.”

On the Puriteens wanting to see less on-screen sex: “I wonder if it’s the pornification of our generation. Or maybe the fact that due to the digital age, something so human as having sex feels like an affront.”

‘The Idea of You’ ends on a hopeful note: “It’s a very real-life ending. The implication is they get another shot at it, which just felt like the right ending, I think. Timing is everything for people. Sometimes waiting and re-approaching something later on works out, and sometimes it doesn’t. But for this unconventional love story, we wanted a hopeful message.”

[From British GQ]

“That due to the digital age, something so human as having sex feels like an affront.” There’s so much truth to that, although I think the Puriteen phenomenon is a lot more complicated than that and it has deeper roots than just “it’s a by-product of a digital age.” But I like the way he thinks and, I’ll be honest, I had no idea that this man identifies as straight. He’s been grabbing gay roles for a while and I’m surprised that this hasn’t been a bigger conversation, whether or not those roles should have gone to gay actors. I love what he says about masculinity too. He seems like a great guy, honestly.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, cover courtesy of British GQ.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Nicholas Galitzine: ‘I identify as a straight man’ & feel guilt about taking gay roles”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Elle says:

    I haven’t seen any of his movies, but he comes across in this interview as not only extremely well spoken, but also quite thoughtful. I will have to watch Red, White & Royal Blue and The Idea of You now!

    • ariel says:

      I enjoyed the Idea of You thoroughly. It was a perfect lazy saturday afternoon watch.
      A little romance, a little sexual chemistry, a good mom/daughter vibe, a little- yeah- how the media and society treat women is awful and crazy.

      After reading this i kind of want to watch the red white and royal blue. I bet its adorable too.

  2. Hypocrisy says:

    So I watched Red, White and Royal Blue with a group of gay men when I was visiting my friend, I had seen it before but they had not. Every single man there loved him, so I don’t think his audience cares especially since I know they all watched him with Ann Hathaway and thought he was just as hot. I guess I don’t think it should matter because I wouldn’t care if was gay playing the love interest with a female character.. he’s just a great romantic lead imo.

  3. Nubia says:

    I know some people hate this argument,but to me that is the whole POINT of acting,literally get out of your own character. And him and Anne were adorable in their movie.

    • H says:

      Exactly! I have also seen gay men play straight very convincingly. Let actors act. People can captivate us no matter their identity and I don’t need them to restrict themselves to only roles for their exact identity.

    • Kitten says:

      Yeah…I *mostly* agree. I mean, I definitely feel that actors should be able to play a character that has a different sexual orientation. 100%. Kevin Spacey has played many a straight man, for instance.
      But I still think we need more diversity in casting overall. If it’s a gay male character, it shouldn’t be all cishet men auditioning—which a lot of times it is. And conversely, If it’s a cishet character, gay folks should have equal opportunity to audition for that role.
      Because we DO need more opportunities for LGBTQ actors in general. So when it’s a gay character and the studio or director has only one cishet actor in mind, I have an issue with that.

  4. Mika says:

    I enjoyed both these movies! I think RW&RB could have been a little more energetic and faster paced but the two leads are great. The Idea of You was sweet and pretty hot. A great movie to watch while slowly making pasta sauce.

    (Also, yes, I’m commenting on this just to make sure we get more of these articles and less royal family ones. I know how to algorithm. Kind of.)

    • Emster says:

      Agree, RW&RB definitely had its moments, but would’ve benefited from a tighter edit.

      (And yes, to the last part of your comment too)

  5. Nikomikaelx says:

    Not every gayman is the same obviously , but just speaking for myself as a gayman; i dont think it matters whats your sexuality is when getting casting for a role.

    There so many problems with it, it would mean that people would have to out themselves for roles , we shoulnt care or have the right to know about actors private lifes, just cause they are in the business. Also sexuality is a spectrum , and people might think they are gay or bi or straight and realise later thats not the case. Then they would be getting canceled cause people would think they “lied” before . Just be thoughtful when taking roles as gay, and its fine. /Thoughtful as in, not making mockery of our sexuality etc)

    Also commenting on this so it get more fraction, like someone allready commented this site has been 90% royal news for a long time now (and i understand that you have to do posts about things that get comments so, hopefully people start commenting on other stuff too)

  6. Matilda says:

    In the end shouldn’t the role go to the best actor? I am sure gay actors would not want to be relegated to just playing gay roles. Look how many closeted gay actors throughout the decades have successfully played straight roles. An actor’s sexuality should not be the reason they get or don’t get a role, it should be their talent.

    • Kitten says:

      Right except those actors were in the closet because why? They felt like they had to be so they could get the role and that’s kinda the problem. Historically, “the best actor for the job” has implicitly meant the best straight person.
      And you can see from my comment above that I mostly agree with you with the caveat that Hollywood needs to prioritize giving LGBTQ actors a seat at the table; the same opportunities that they continually afford cishet actors.
      I do think it’s getting better but we have a ways to go.

      • Matilda says:

        Those actors were in the closet because it was a different time and only their close friends and colleagues were possibly aware of their sexual orientation. Now there is no excuse to not hire an actor because of their sexuality because luckily times are changing (still much to change). I believe if you chose by talent all can be represented. Now I know why many actors refuse to discuss their sexual orientation even though it might be very apparent. Because it has both to do with the job. That said I appreciate producers like Ryan Murphy focusing on LGBTQ stories and the comfort many of his actors have in representing their stories.

      • Kitten says:

        The only reason why there’s been any (incremental) change is because of people protesting the studios and essentially forcing them to hire more LGBTQ actors. It’s not because times have magically changed–it’s because LGBTQ activists essentially demanded it. And even then, the very same issue still persists where actors feel compelled to keep their sexual orientation private so they have more opportunities.

        2024 Oscar nominees (LGBT central characters):
        * Annette Benning, nominated for playing lesbian swimmer Diana Nyad.
        * Sterling K Brown, nominated for playing newly out brother in American Fiction
        * Bradley Cooper nominated for playing famous gay maestro Leonard Bernstein

        I will say that it was nice to see Colman Domingo and Jodi Foster being nominated for playing gay roles but it’s still a problem that 3 out of the 5 LGBTQ characters recognized by the Oscars were played by cishet folks. COME ON, you couldn’t find a talented gay actor who could play the part of freaking Leonard Bernstein??? Give me a break. And I truly believe that Coleman Domingo was hired because the director of Rustin, a black gay man, understood how important it was to have a gay black civil rights icon played by a gay black man. Some roles really shouldn’t go to straight folks.
        *Looking at you Gus Van Sant for casting Sean Penn as Harvey Milk.*

        So again, there needs to be more opportunities for LGBTQ actors in general and if part of that is prioritizing LGBTQ actors for LGBTQ roles, I’m ok with that.

      • just a quick comment says:

        @KITTEN As a queer biracial man, I want to say: THANK YOU. Thank you for getting it. We don’t believe the “best actor for the role” excuse when it’s about race and it always means white. Why should we accept it when it’s about sexuality or gender identity and it always means straight/cis?

        “I truly believe that Coleman Domingo was hired because the director of Rustin, a black gay man, understood how important it was to have a gay black civil rights icon played by a gay black man.”

        EXACTLY! OUR stories by/for OURSELVES.

        “there needs to be more opportunities for LGBTQ actors in general and if part of that is prioritizing LGBTQ actors for LGBTQ roles, I’m ok with that.”

        Agree.

  7. Teddy says:

    I identify as a Nicholas Galatzine stan.

    Srsly, he’s so good in everything he’s been in. Intelligence and wit and yes, handsome. Looking forward to seeing where his career takes him.

  8. Jais says:

    He’s attractive. And seems like a good actor so far. I’d watch him for sure in more things.

  9. Danbury says:

    I saw him in both RW&RB and The Idea of You and he was lovely. As opposed to some of those other idiot actors that seem to be getting all the attention (I’m thinking of the Miles Tellers of the world that drive me BONKERS), this guy actually has some charisma and talent. Can’t wait to see what he does next.

  10. SAMESAME says:

    I enjoyed reading this article today. That is all.

    @MIKA @NIKOMIKAELX, as much as i enjoy me some royal tea, I agree and I join you

  11. D says:

    I’ve seen him in 4 projects and he played a queer character in 3 of them. I thought he was good in all of them and never really thought about whether he was queer in real life or not, but I do like that he acknowledges the conflict he feels. It’s a tricky question about casting and honestly so much of that is up to the director and producers. Luca Guadagnino consistently casts straight actors in queer roles and his argument is that he casts the person who is the best fit for the part, regardless of sexuality. If gay directors aren’t going to prioritize casting queer actors in queer roles I don’t know who will.

  12. Flamingo says:

    I just started binging Mary & George on Starz and he is beautiful. I never care what an actor’s sexuality is. Since they are all my boyfriends in my head.