The Waleses will encourage Charlotte & Louis to avoid becoming ‘working royals’

Last week, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden had the big exclusive that Prince William 100% supports his father’s efforts to “slim down” the British monarchy. King Charles has long believed that the monarchy needs to support fewer royal cousins and royal-adjacents and that strict “working royal” boundaries must be enforced. This was always contingent on Prince Harry sticking around and Prince William and Kate’s marriage never collapsing. The events of the past six months should have shown Charles and William that their slimmed-down monarchy is pretty sad and threadbare. Instead, William is barreling ahead with a plot to slim the monarchy down even further during his reign (of terror). According to the Daily Beast’s sources, William and Kate plan to encourage Princess Charlotte and Louis to avoid becoming “working royals.” And it’s all about Prince Harry, obviously.

Prince Louis and Princess Charlotte, Prince William’s two younger children, are to be “encouraged to not become working royals” under radical plans to reshape the British monarchy when William and Princess Kate ascend the throne, following the disastrous impact on the family of Prince Harry’s vitriolic exit from royal life. One insider told The Daily Beast: “The working assumption is that the younger two children will get on and do their own thing. They will be encouraged to not become working royals.”

William and Kate’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the bombshell claims made by the insider, a former Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace staffer who keeps in contact with former colleagues. They were speaking after a report in the Daily Mail said William not only agreed with his father King Charles’ drive to slim down the monarchy but would go even further. The report cited a friend as saying: “When the older members of the family retire, (William) won’t be inviting anyone else to become working royals. It remains to be seen if he will even want his two younger children to be working royals.”

The source said of the report, “It’s absolutely true. The option isn’t there for George, of course, but the children have been kept at arm’s length from royal life. They are exposed to the minimum possible publicity, and that is a deliberate strategy to let Charlotte and Louis choose their own destiny.”

A friend of the couple who spoke to The Daily Beast concurred with the report in the Mail saying: “It is no secret that William has been devastated by the destruction of his relationship with Harry. Although he absolutely puts the blame on Meghan and Harry, he does of course also appreciate that the whole system, where one of your kids is less important than the other due to an accident of birth, had a massive part to play in what happened and how it happened.”

“There is an entirely reasonable argument to be made that if you are born into the royal family, the logical thing to do is to leave it. The same logic applies to your kids, he doesn’t want to put them through a human mincer that is going to cause everyone misery. He and Catherine adore the children, and their whole lives are about the children. I think they want to find a practical solution to the ‘spare’ problem that has bedeviled the family for generations.”

Critics, of course, will argue that if the couple don’t want the children to take on formal royal duties, they should stop promoting them, and the royal family should stop using them to market itself….Defenders of the Waleses retort that they would like nothing better than for their children to grow up in total obscurity, but say that’s not realistic, and point out that the carefully staggered release of images of the children has largely achieved its primary goal of destroying the paparazzi market for such pictures.

As another friend of the family told The Daily Beast: “If you look at the spares who have made it work, you only really have Edward and Anne. Margaret’s life was pretty miserable. Harry we know all about. I’m sure William and Catherine don’t want history to repeat itself.”

[From The Daily Beast]

“He does of course also appreciate that the whole system, where one of your kids is less important than the other due to an accident of birth…” Until William comes to terms with the reality of the situation, he’s doomed to repeat it. It’s not that Harry was “less important” than him because of an accident of birth, it’s that Harry was neglected, pushed down, marginalized, denigrated and used as a human shield for his idiotic and lazy older brother. It’s not that Harry was somehow born less “important,” it’s that William smeared and abused his brother and sister-in-law to the point where they had to flee the country. The issue was not “Harry should have never been a working royal, that was the root of the problem!” It sure sounds like William and Kate believe that their kids will get to pick and choose their “working royal” status and probably even be “half-in.” That’s what they’re building up to. Once again, Harry and Meghan came up with a great solution and the Windsors have spent the past four-plus years tying themselves in knots to cry about how half-in royals are never allowed!

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Kensington Palace.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

90 Responses to “The Waleses will encourage Charlotte & Louis to avoid becoming ‘working royals’”

  1. Liz says:

    That’s easy – they just need to copy their parents.

  2. Anonymous says:

    They’ll offer the deal to their children that H and M were denied, and the rota will crow that they are modernizing the crown. Poor George will probably be forced into full time royal status right away since William hates working so much – he’s stalling until his kids can be the focus. But the question we’re all dying to know— will the kids be allowed on the balcony if theyre not full time royals???!!!

  3. Blithe says:

    William’s decisions sound potentially pretty hellish for George. There is a middle ground — preparing all three of the kids for possible royal duties as well as independent careers, so that they will continue to have choices throughout their lives.

    • Libra says:

      What is this you are saying? Half in and half out? Shocking.

      • Blithe says:

        Half in and half out. Or all in if all three want that. Or George can either abdicate or relax a bit if Charlotte and/or Louis are really into royaling. Charles and William seem to be setting up a really difficult life for George — without the support of siblings and cousins who can support him or step in when need be. Do the Wales kids know any of the distantly related royal kids in their generation? At the same time, while George might not have unlimited career options, he does have some — and should get to explore and practice his interests as other royals have done. He and his siblings might even have interests that the monarchy is uniquely suited to support. I’ve long been confused because Kate — and I think William — studied Art History at University. They live surrounded by awesome architecture and world class art — yet neither one has done a monograph or podcast or TED talk or taken students on a tour of royal holdings, or anything that I’m aware of that takes advantage of all that they have access to in a meaningful way. Maybe the next generation will be both more flexible and better educated.

    • DK says:

      Yep – when H&M first left, all William did was complain about how much harder that made life for him and his children, since they’d have to work harder to pick up the slack.

      Now he wants George to do it all on his own?

      Shall we expect George to start briefing against Charlotte and Louis when they all come of age, for making George’s life miserable and forcing George’s children to have to work?!

      What an endless cycle of misery these royals continue to reinvent for themselves. Maybe if they just instilled a genuine work ethic and a genuine sense of family values, they’d stop being such whiny weirdos.

      • Christine says:

        I don’t ever want to see the Wails use Charlotte and Louis for positive publicity again. In fact, they should never appear publicly again.

        This is abusive, William and Kate are happy to trot out the kids when things aren’t going their way, but when they are adults? On their own.

  4. Zoid says:

    They’ll offer their kids the deal and H and M were denied, and the rota will crow about them modernizing the monarchy. George will likely have to work full time right away and not get a 40 years break, since William hates working so much. He is stalling until his kids are old enough to draw all the media attention. Only a few more short years!!!! But the real question is— will the part time royals be allowed on the balcony??!?!?!

  5. Royal Downfall Watcher says:

    Anyone else feel like they have whiplash? The 180 degree turn around from where we were a month ago to today is bizarre. Suddenly William is all over the place taking his kids fun places. Showing them off, if you will. I hope those kids are having a good time. It is just odd that SUDDENLY Kate and Will and the kids are happy families again. Why weren’t they doing this two months ago? Why wasn’t he taking anyone other than George to anything fun? There was nothing nothing nothing and then BAM! Everything all at once.

    Seems an agreement was made or maybe Charles laid down the law?

    • ML says:

      Lest we think that W is being original (nevermind the whole *cough* H&M debacle), this is very Continental Euro royal. So this system is technically the norm.

      The messaging has semi returned to normal since K has been seen in public, and when the RR isn’t dusting off their older playlist, there seems to be a huge effort into giving W a glow up. If there’s been some sort of agreement, I’d say it happened before D-Day: since then, QCC has been cranky.

    • Christine says:

      This is actually making me really angry. Kate and William have basically fcuked off for a half a year, but any time things started to turn south for them, their children were trotted out or a photo of them was released.

      I feel like I am going to be the charter member of #FreeCharlotteandLouis. I don’t ever want to see the Wails release a photo of them again, and cute little trips to a Taylor Swift concert? Only for George now! That’s nice for Charlotte, she’s really going out with a bang.

  6. Neeve says:

    It seems like the Spare misery has been skipping generations. Princess Margaret ,then Harry maybe it will skip the Wales kids. The Queen seemed to love and try to make her kids as equal as possible, I’m sure Charles knew he was the most important,but she set up her children in huge homes,titles and some financial stability.

    • DK says:

      Spare syndrome hit Andrew pretty hard in that generation. And that’s even with his being his mother’s favorite.

      • Christine says:

        Yeah, I’d go so far as to say things worked out better for Margaret. She only ended up choosing vices that hurt herself, she wasn’t a raging pedophile.

    • sevenblue says:

      That makes a lot of sense. The heir sees their sibling’s misery and tries to protect their own children from the same faith. Will would never accept the wrongs done to Harry, but he wouldn’t put his own children into the same dangerous situation. But, the history repeats itself in the end with the future generations since they seem not to learn anything from their mistakes.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think QEII’s children also have done better overall because there was an age gap (so charles and Andrew were not at school together, etc) and Anne got bumped far enough down the line after Andrew and Edward were born that she wasn’t really a “spare” at that point. And it seemed the queen took care of all her children financially, so you didn’t have the set up of one child being reduced to shopping bargain sales while the other got millions to redo yet another home.

      • molly says:

        QEII’s kids definitely lucked out with birth order and age gaps.

        If Ann is born Andrew, it’s the exact same competitive, compared, heir/spare relationship of William and Harry. But because Andrew and Edward were basically raised separate, and practically by different parents, Charles v. Andrew wasn’t even a possibility until well into adulthood.

      • Christine says:

        That 11 year difference between Chuck and Pedo did a lot of heavy lifting, and they still cannot stand each other.

      • spankFD says:

        Or, they could ALL wean themselves from the public test and then never have to face the expectation to “work” again. #DropKickRoyalGrift

    • Laura D says:

      @Neeve – this what I can’t get over with KCIII, he keeps telling the world how much he loves Harry but, his actions repeatedly show this cannot possibly be the case. As POW Charles was rich enough to provide H&M with a forever home with a lease as watertight as the one arranged by QEII for Andrew. Instead he let his mother (QEII) set up Harry and Meghan in a new home. A home with a lease which meant they could be evicted on the whim of a ruling monarch and/or his heir(s). All KCIII has ever done is treat his youngest son with scornful contempt and if anyone who has read Spare will know the ill treatment started way before “Evictiongate.”

      • Magdalena says:

        “and were angling for Frogmore House” – @Miss Scarlett: this is a big fat lie and straight out of derangerville. Harry told us how they ended up in Frogmore Cottage and he actually said that he and Meghan turned down several properties which they felt were too grand. They did not accept the Kensington apartment because it would be too expensive to fix the problems it had AND would not be ready in time for their son’s birth. That’s it. None of this “angling for” nonsense. Neither did Charles offer them that house in the country.

        Why is it so hard to believe Harry’s own words, but so easy to believe the rubbish which William and Kate’s “fans” and the tabloids create out of while cloth?

      • Christine says:

        Miss Scarlett, I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but none of it is correct. This is easily obtainable information, I suggest you use the search function on this site. It will take you to what the rota was printing at the time.

  7. GoodWitchGlenda says:

    I found something really sinister about the comment “The option isn’t there for George, of course.” What if George doesn’t want to be king? Hereditary monarchy is gross on so many levels.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      The entire royal system is about denying people agency and choice. It’s literally from the Middle Ages. It can’t be made to work now in the modern world. Young people expect to have choices in life. The Wales kids all seem to have different personalities and interests. Their father sounds determined to pound square pegs ( no pun intended) into round holes. It will only lead to more misery and estrangement now that the next generation has seen through Harry that you can actually leave if you’re prepared to support yourself.

      • bisynaptic says:

        Pretty sure royalty existed before the Middle Ages.

      • Christine says:

        Agreed, Brassy Rebel. The only thing different for Charlotte and Louis is their parents announcing, while they are still young, that they won’t be working royals. I will not take the bet that they have actually said this to Charlotte or Louis. They are going to keep capitalizing on them while they are young and cute, and while people seem to think Charlotte is QEII’s double and Louis is the family comedian.

    • Dee says:

      William will be the one to end the monarchy. He doesn’t want it, just the privilege and that’s not going to hold up in the 21st century light.

      • Meredith says:

        He isn’t going to end the monarchy, because that would involve the work of resolving a constitutional and property ownership crisis, and all of that is so above his ability. He will instead be the whiniest king to king, and train George to take over as is his duty.

    • Jais says:

      The system is gross. Full stop. Especially considering that family’s toxic relationship with the British tabloid press.

    • blueberry says:

      Exactly. What if he doesn’t have any kids?

  8. Lau says:

    I don’t think William understand how a monarchy is supposed to work but oh well, he’ll just precipitate the process of having it collapsing.

    • DK says:

      Yeah, I am curious how he thinks this will work for them financially. Will Charlotte and Louis need to earn all their own money (so one sibling inherits actual billions, and the others…nothing?! Remember C & L are not going to inherit much from Kate, as W&H did from Diana) or will George need to give them allowances/pay for them, like Charles does for so many of his family members…which leads to him controlling them, essentially, and being able to threaten to pull the financing out from under them at a moment’s notice, as he is constantly doing with PedoBro.

      None of this is conducive to healthy sibling relationships OR healthy financial arrangements.

      • Meredith says:

        The money the princes inherited from Diana was mostly her divorce settlement money— so Kate may end up having similar wealth to pass on!

      • Miss Scarlett says:

        I’m not sure William would actually do this, but I think a decent father in William’s position would put some of his Duchy income into trust funds for Charlotte and Louis, knowing they won’t have George’s future income to rely upon. I’m actually shocked Charles simply bankrolled his children and didn’t do this for Harry. Charles is absolutely loaded. He should have set up Harry more appropriately.

      • Christine says:

        I am now so depressed, because you are right, DK. They have no money that will go directly to them, like Harry had from Diana. We all know that Meghan being a successful woman with her own money and contacts she could reach out to who would help was what saved them in the end.

        Charlotte and Louis have none of that. They have to pray every night that their brother still likes them once he is king.

        Spoiler alert: He won’t.

    • Eurydice says:

      I think he actually does understand it. He will be the only royal with any official obligations. At the same time he’ll have access to pantloads of money apart from the Sovereign Grant. Charlotte and Louis aren’t needed in an official way and they’ll have plenty of money to live on.
      And all those thousands of patronages can breathe a sigh of relief that they won’t have to endure any more royal visits.

      • Jais says:

        Plenty of money to live on? So do you think he’ll set money aside for them regardless of the fact that they will do zero work for the monarchy? I mean that’s one way to assure they won’t talk.

      • SarahCS says:

        Assuming George shares his wealth with them?

      • Christine says:

        Agreed. This is all contingent on George becoming a more upstanding and compassionate king than his grandfather and father. Likelihood George isn’t a raging narcissist who thinks he is the most special person on Earth is zero.

        William is his father and Kate is his mother, he is definitely going to be worse.

      • JudyB says:

        I also wonder if William will really provide “plenty of money” for his two spare kids. And it is also possible that George will not share his wealth with either of them. The big problem is that spares are dependent on their parents and then their sibling who get the power of the kingship. My first reaction to the suggestion that they will be encouraged not to be working royals is that having them get real jobs will save money for the monarch, whoever that is.

        And H&M are working hard to make money because they have to in order to provide a secure home for their kids and to provide the needed security for them. They aren’t doing it just so they can take advantage of their royal status. As an American, I am constantly puzzled as to why earning money is considered such a bad thing for members of the British aristocracy.

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      I don’t see a problem with this. Only the monarch has a “job” (head of state). The others are not necessary, and are just an excuse to grab more mansions and wealth for the “family.” The head of state should just receive a salary to live on, one residence, and security, and that’s it. Other family members can earn their own living.

  9. Kelly says:

    Poor George. He always looks so stressed. That photo of him at the Swift concert is one of the few times I’ve seen him with a real smile.

    Lord, William is a trash person.

    • JudyB says:

      At least his father did not make him wear a suit to the concert!!! That alone must make him smile and feel happy.

  10. Truthiness says:

    I love photos where nobody is looking in the same direction. You could write a novel about the 5 different storylines in that balcony pic.

    • CatMum says:

      at least the balcony pic is real, unlike the ridiculously obvious frankenphoto at the top of the post! there’s no way any of that one is real. the light sources on the people and the beach don’t match, for one thing. they just can’t seem to give it up!

      also, this article has a massive subtext that Harry had a point! interesting to see that. I think they’re desperate to pull focus from Kate’s facial scar.

  11. Hypocrisy says:

    I hope their children choose to become writers and author memoirs. Would love to read exactly what happened from Charlotte and Louis’ point of view maybe they can be the writers for a new series of the Crown, call it the Peggy era🤷🏻‍♀️

  12. drgnflyathome says:

    I just don’t see this happening. It’s a nice article to try to make them seem more modern and letting their kids do what they want, but with how angry he’s been with Harry leaving, I don’t see them giving their kids an option – Charlotte and Louis are being raised to be George’s support and I’m sure they’ve heard a lot of unhinged, angry things about H&M and how that’s put so much burden on W&K. Maybe they’ll claim the kids have a choice, but they see how Uncle Harry has been ostracized and treated. They’ve already allowed the comparison of Charlotte to QEII and Princess Anne for years. And if Charlotte and Louis do go their own way, is George going to be standing on that balcony alone?? The British Media will never allow it. If those kids aren’t full time working royals, they will be thrown to the wolves too for abandoning their duties to their brother and the crown.

  13. Jais says:

    So if Charlotte and Louis aren’t working royals, will they no longer get security? Bc that’s how it works right?

    • Lady Esther says:

      In theory yes, security is supposed to come with being a working royal but as we see, it’s completely idiosyncratic (and why Harry is fighting it IMO)

      1) Andrew no longer has security “officially” but Charles provides it and pays for it (admittedly, probably there are a lot of people in Epstein’s circle gunning for him and it’s also to keep Andrew sweet)

      2) Sophie/Edward are “working royals” but it was reported many years ago that they only get security while on official duties. However…I’m sure Bagshot Park is protected 24/7? And Lady Louise at St Andrews, I’m sure she has security? Etc

      3) When Charles feels like it, he can have official security for anyone in his family, working or non-working and presumably the taxpayer picks up the bill – for example, Harry at the Coronation, Harry and Meghan at the Queen’s funeral, etc

  14. Amy Bee says:

    I believe the monarchy is in its last days so Charlotte and Louis won’t be able to become working royals.

    • ChewieNYC says:

      This. I think Will is going to negotiate an end to the monarchy as is and pick and choose properties to keep and their final monetary amounts and tax breaks. George will never be King but those kids will have massive inheritance to spilt amongst just them and no other Windsors.

      • Meredith says:

        Because the crown is the head of state, and the prime minister is not, they can’t just stop having a head of state without a constitutional overhaul.

      • Dee says:

        You don’t have to remove the crown, head of state, the titles, etc. You just stop funding them.

      • Innie says:

        This is a vast oversimplication, but essentially, George III owned the Crown Estate before he gave it to the government (along with the responsibility of funding the government) in exchange for Civil List (now Sovereign Grant) payments.

        I despise William, but the government can’t simply take the Sovereign Grant away from the monarch without compensation (at least, not as long as we have the rule of law they can’t).

    • sparrow1 says:

      I rather think this new approach to monarchy will be their saving, rather than ending. Hear me out! Kate’s absence has proved people haven’t missed her as a working royal but as a seen royal. As long as the UK gets to see her at an event or two, they’re pleased enough. William is moving into the hands-off, ‘we’re here just for the ceremonial’, style of monarchy that he’s long wanted. And the British public seem to be OK with that. Dress her up, put him in a military uniform, stand them on a balcony. All’s fine. Becks1 made a good point about the funding they get; hopefully this will be slimmed down.

  15. JanetDR says:

    I would think the whole point of the monarchy (since they just need the monarch to sign some papers) would be letting everyone get a little shine from association. Like, having a third cousin of QEII come to open the event that your branch of the WI is throwing and it’s sort of thrilling. (Is the Women’s Institute still a thing? It certainly has been featured in a lot of my reading 😄)
    And the third cousin has a rent free cottage and gets invited to the occasional event herself.

    • JanetDR says:

      And if you are asking yourself What is she reading?, The Diary of a Provincial Lady from 1930? The answer is yes. I have my grandma’s copy.

  16. Ivy says:

    I don’t think it will be George, for some reason. I think it will be Charlotte.

    • Steph says:

      Interesting point bc the spares are literally the back up plan. How do you prepare them for independent private lives when it can be ripped out from them in a moment’s notice?

  17. The Duchess says:

    Talk about fast-tracking your child to a mental breakdown by the time he’s 25. It’s no secret the WanK’s are woefully out of their depths, especially when it comes to their children. Chasing H&M away was always going to bite them one way or another. I wonder if Willy & Kitty are training their children all the tricks in the book to do as little as possible for maximum reward?

    • Jais says:

      Fr. It’s honestly going to be fascinating to see what William has learned or thinks he has learned from his relationship with his brother. He sold his brother out for his own good press. There’s no other way to see it. If push comes to shove one day, will George refuse to do the same? Will William teach him to do as he did? It’s dark as hell to think about. I get that those are very privileged kids who who have so much more than others ever will but I still don’t envy their position at all.

  18. EasternViolet says:

    I guess this means that William will be okay when George weaponises the press against Charlotte and Louis to prop up his own PR. Chip off the old block… that will be fine, right?

  19. Tessa says:

    Carole might want to set up Charlotte and Louis so both can marry onto other royal families and get titles

    • Sid says:

      I can’t imagine any other royal family that would want the circus that would come with having one of the current Wales kids marry into their family. Except maybe the Monegasque crew but they’re only “princely,” and I imagine that Mrs. Middleton didn’t scam and work this hard just for one of her grands to marry “down.”

  20. Becks1 says:

    So does this mean the sovereign grant will be reduced?? What’s that, of course not, what a silly suggestion? Huh, how surprising.

  21. S808 says:

    Godspeed George, he will be working full time sooner rather than later. His parents will need the cover and the papers needs something to talk about. Charlotte and Louis will absolutely be full time royals at least for the majority of their adulthood until George has a family of his own. Only after that could they possibly become part-time at best.

  22. Tina says:

    While I do think William would be happy if the monarchy folded I think he is just setting it up so that the work of the monarch is the Constitutional stuff, meeting and greeting visiting dignitaries, some of the old traditions like Trooping, holidays like Easter and Christmas and then it will just be fun stuff like Wimbledon, soccer games, movie premieres etc. The era of patronages and the bread and butter visits will be over. They don’t need a million people to do that. Charlotte and Louis can get jobs like Bea and Eugenie and then still be called in to do some fun stuff. I do feel for George though.

    • Lady Digby says:

      @Tina his take on modernization is just to do what he fancies as King. BM keep foaming at the mouth because Harry is busy with IG and visits to Nigeria whilst the heir is not earning his keep and is Stating clearly that he’s going to be a lazy king and they don’t write a word of criticism? Will IS the BM’s worst nightmare: lazy, inept, charmless doofus who is meant to “make us proud to be British who have the bestest ever king” ( wrong on all levels!)

    • Hanna says:

      I completely agree with Tina that this is the longterm plan, to reduce the patronages and amount of work that is expected of the family, so less working royals will be needed. I am not sure I think it’s the worst idea–it almost seems like they may be accepting the inevitable decline in relevance? Then again, that’s probably giving them too much credit.

      • Meredith says:

        There has definitely been a decline in relevance as society has evolved away from a belief that leaders are ordained by god. But it’s also just a different world than when the Queen was young and television didn’t even exist yet. Patronages are no longer necessary for them to be seen and believed— they can stay in people’s consciousness through media coverage of all types.

  23. Eurydice says:

    I don’t think Harry and William are 100% opposites of each other like the press makes them out to be. They both grew up with a dogsh*t father in the middle of an oppressive institution, they both had a rebellious mother. They both hate the press. How they’ve dealt with things is different because of their positions, characters and personalities, but I think Harry was being literal when he said William is trapped.

    William thought he could coast for a couple of decades, but Charles’ cancer shocked him out of that idea. So, the only way to loosen the trap is from the inside. Cut back, cut back, cut back, until the press is starved and the institution whithers. How that will work with what seems to be his need for publicity, I don’t know, but that might also be a BM narrative because he never seems to do anything splashy, only to talk about it.

    • booboocita says:

      Willy needs publicity only because Harry gets such great press from the global media. The RR may kiss Willy’s butt, but press outlets outside the UK adore H & M. If Harry had just faded into obscurity after leaving, Willy would be even more scarce than he is now.

  24. Sharpi says:

    I don’t think William has any idea what he is doing to the reputation what little is left of the monarchy. I don’t think that George will ever be king you can already tell his heart is not in it. I think that Charlotte will be Queen. Based on gut feeling and also a very prolific dream I had while Catherine was still pregnant with her and we didnt know it was a girl. The dream was of a young woman walking onto the palace balcony looking at the crowds below. Someone shouted who are you and she said Charlotte your new Queen. When they announced the babies name the hair on the back of my neck stood up and all I could think was wow. Last time a dream like that happened was 911 I was in the streets and airplanes hit the two towers two weeks later it happened .

  25. QuiteContrary says:

    “Working royal” in the British context is an oxymoron.

    Kate and Will are at least teaching their kids well on that score.

  26. sparrow1 says:

    So sad for George. What will that do to him, on a personal level, also to his relationship with his siblings. Dreadful.

  27. Emmlo says:

    It’s wild to me how little effort it would have taken for the crown to avoid all this mess. Had BP quietly told the tabloids to stay away from Thomas Markle. Had QEII signed off on Harry’s proposal to be half in and made Frogmore an airtight lease. Had the family just shut up and stopped nastily briefing against H&M while Meghan was pregnant with Archie. It absolutely didn’t have to be this way. I hope Charlotte and Louis get out of the Firm and live happy, fulfilled lives.

  28. bisynaptic says:

    “There is an entirely reasonable argument to be made that if you are born into the royal family, the logical thing to do is to leave it.”
    — !!!!

  29. Well-Wisher says:

    What would they do if they want to be free of bullying and sledgehammer journalism??

  30. Eliora says:

    All that when all they really want to say is, ‘Harry was absolutely right.’ Willy and Catherine want their two younger kids i.e. the “spares” to follow in their uncle’s footstep and find their own path in life. Yet them and their media pals continue to crucify Harry and Meghan for leading the pack.

    Even in this William and Kate will copy Harry and Meghan and try to market it as the Wales family’s “progressive” new accomplishment. Aren’t they tired of the copy and paste living? I know we are 😴.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment