Kevin Costner famously (infamously) fell hard for Whitney Houston when they worked together on The Bodyguard. Nevermind that Whitney had already fallen for Bobby Brown and would soon be married to him. But I remember how Costner was really torn up about Whitney’s death and how much he loved her and adored her. When The Bodyguard became a huge hit, there was always talk of a sequel, of finding some way to put Costner and Whitney together again, or giving Costner’s bodyguard a new, equally famous protectee. There were always rumors that Kevin wanted Princess Diana in a potential sequel, but it always felt like those rumors were mostly just “it would have been cool, but no one ever followed up on it.” Well, several days ago, Costner appeared on Howard Stern’s show and he confirmed the Diana rumors and then some. Apparently, he had even spoken to Diana and she wanted to do the sequel. Costner also said that the palace came down on him HARD after Diana’s death.
Kevin Costner was at odds with the British royal family in the 1990s. During his interview on “The Howard Stern Show” on Tuesday, the Oscar winner, 69, confirmed that a sequel to his hit 1992 film “The Bodyguard” with Whitney Houston was in the works with Princess Diana as his planned co-star. However, Diana’s death in summer 1997 caused the project to be canceled — and Costner subsequently faced the wrath of the royals, who didn’t believe that the princess was willing to do a Hollywood movie.
“When Diana passed, about a year later it had leaked out that I was prepping ‘Bodyguard 2’ with her. And what happened was, the royal family kind of turned on me a little bit,” he recalled.
“Like, ‘No, that’s not true.’ And it got actually kind of ugly,” Costner continued. “And I let it go for a while. It just got uglier and uglier.”
The “Yellowstone” star said that he ended up reaching out to Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, who initially connected Costner with Diana, and asked for her help.
“Finally I called up Sarah, and said, ‘Sarah, you need to tell me who is leading the charge there on this thing. She goes, ‘No, no, no, Kev, you don’t want to talk to them.’ I said, ‘Yes I do.’ I called them up and I said, ‘I’m telling you something, you need to stop because it is true. And if you don’t stop, I’m gonna start. Because it was.’”
At the time that Costner was trying to make “The Bodyguard 2,” Diana was separated from her former husband Prince Charles (now King Charles) and was on the outs with the royal family ruled by the now-late Queen Elizabeth II. Costner explained how he got Diana to agree to do the film. “What had happened was, I started talking to her through Sarah, and I said, ‘Look, I’m gonna do ‘Bodyguard 2′ and I think I can build this around you. Would you be interested?’ ” he recalled. “And she goes, ‘Yes. My life’s about to change.’ I didn’t really go into depth with it, but I thought I understood what she was saying.”
He added, “She was very sweet and we talked. The second time we talked she said, ‘Is there going to be a kissing scene?’ I said, ‘Do you want there to be one?’ She said, ‘Yeah,’ and I said, ‘Then we’ll do that.’ I wasn’t going to make the full romance about her. But there was going to be a moment that we did. And she was so sweet about this.”
Diana died in a car crash in Paris in August 1997 at the age of 36, and Costner decided not to move forward with “The Bodyguard” sequel. “I could not replace Princess Di,” he said.
It’s interesting that he’s confirming the decades of rumors about this and I love that he was able to speak to Diana directly too, and that she wanted to do it. But the most fascinating part – to me – is that the palace was, like, panic-briefing denials to the story. Even with Diana dead, they still wanted to control her life. They didn’t want people to understand that Diana actually had some real options once she was divorced. The Windsors were losing their minds at the idea that a divorced Princess of Wales might fly to California and make movies and be fully independent from them. Sound familiar? Because their nightmare came true 33 years later with Diana’s younger son.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
I never heard anything about Princess Di being in the Bodyguard sequel until just this minute. It actually made my heart swell for her, although it is also bittersweet. She died too young, but I am glad that she saw great new things for herself coming down the pipe.
💯❤️❤️❤️❤️
I am not sure the sequel was a good idea, but pissing the Firm off is always good.
Agreed. The idea of it is a bit ghastly.
Yes, ITA. Just seems like an opportunity for him to shoot his shot with the Princess. No. He’s a good actor, but there’s something off about him.
🎯
I remember these rumors vividly. And her wanting to do the film gives me the willies because I feel like The Firm would have done a LOT to prevent that from happening.
I will tweak this a bit and say, they DID do A LOT, to prevent her from EVER doing ANYTHING again.
This whole story is really interesting. Kevin Costner really experienced just how that family operates. He told a true story and then the palace attacked him for a year saying it’s not true. They were essentially calling him a liar. And Fergie saying no you don’t want to talk to them? Sigh. They’re all so trained to just bow down to what the institution wants. I get that she must’ve thought it would make things worse but still. I’m glad he called them up and said something.
So fascinating. Intimidation has been #1 in the royal playbook for centuries. This time the escapee has managed to live to tell about it.
I remember this rumour but I didn’t believe it at the time. I get why Harry and Meghan was at Kevin Costner’s fundraising event now. He probably talked about Diana and his experience with the Palace with Harry.
I didn’t believe it was more than a rumor or outreach at best. And I may still not except it’s interesting that he namechecked Fergie. She’s not camera shy, especially about Diana, or one to hesitate defending the royals. So it would be risky to name her if it was a lie.
The Firm needs to be worried about people who are older, have enough money and do not give a **** anymore to reveal these types of stories. It’s sort of a delayed FAFO.
I keep going back to the base fact that Harry and Meg’s mere existence, as thriving, rich, tan, unbothered, successful people living in California is an existential crisis for the royals. It is not supposed to be done.
It is the norm that one person (minus the prince of wales cash cow Duchy that charles spent his life building) holds all the purse strings and doles out money as they see fit. Meaning a tremendous amount of control over other adults and their lives.
Maybe they didn’t actually kill Diana- but they sure were happy that she did not live.
Ghouls.
And makes Harry/Meg’s escape all the more impressive.
One more motive for the Windsors to have wanted her permanently gone.
This family is WAY too powerful for anybody’s good.
Thank you thank you Kaiser for doing this story. I had run across this video maybe last week, but it is my new favorite. And my new favorite saying is “if you don’t stop, I’m going to start.” I absolutely love it and love it that someone said it to a royal. I think that Harry’s book was his way of saying that as well. I begrudgingly admit that the Royals are powerful to a certain extent. I also have seen that Kevin Costner is aware of his power, and not in a bad way. Were he not, he would never have come out with this story. What is true, is true. He is dealing in truth. The Royal family is not. They are not an agent for good. Their power is not wielded for good. They think the end justifies the means, and like the Nazis, they believe that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. I believe that they are wicked, and guilty of crimes, even if some of what they do has not been declared a crime. They are guilty of hate crimes. Someone needs to tell these petrified brains that in order to be credited with good, one needs to do good.
Love The Bodyguard, am sure part 2 would have been a horrible sequel because nothing and no-one the world could match Rachel in Frank Farmer’s eyes. I will always love them (see what I did there?).
That being said, I love Costner sharing this background info and of course I would have watched it.
Also find it interesting how well Costner managed to pivot from his divorce. I think the massive discussion around Yellowstone worked to his advantage.
If memory serves, on that last weekend before flying to France she told her reporter friend something to the effect of ‘you will not believe what I am going to do next…..’
Yes – that was the first thing I thought when I saw this story.
Diana – on holiday in the south of France – also warned the country to prepare for a shock after her return.
“You are going to get a big surprise, you’ll see,” she said. “You are going to get a big surprise with the next thing I do.”
This was when she spoke to a reporter wearing her leopard print swimsuit on a boat.
I don’t understand the point of making a sequel without Whitney Houston. Do these people not understand how fan bases work?
But a movie with Diana would have been very interesting.
I am not convinced that Diana would have made a good actress.
This is very cute and I’m happy he’s talking about it and letting everyone know. She was a fascinating person and I’m sure she would have a done a lot of interesting things in her life. Unfortunately gone too early.
Seems like her story comes to a full circle with Meghan (in terms at least of annoying the Royal Family ;))