Tatler’s Social Power list included the Duke of Westminster & zero Windsors

Tatler just released their “Social Power List” rankings for 2024. In previous years, the list has included King Charles and Camilla and/or Prince William and Kate. Not this year. Which is interesting, right? I would argue that both couples actually do have significant social power, but I would also argue that their clout and power is waning. Which seems to be Tatler’s thought process as well, since zero royals are included in their top ten. Instead, Tatler gave the top spot to Hugh Grosvenor and his new wife – they are the Duke and Duchess of Westminster.

The Duke and Duchess of Westminster have knocked the King and Queen off the top spot of the Tatler power list after the society wedding of the year. The list is described by Tatler as “an annual report into where the real power lies in British society”.

Thousands gathered outside Chester Cathedral to catch a glimpse of Hugh Grosvenor and Olivia Henson’s wedding, where the Prince of Wales was an usher. This year the King and Queen failed to make any of the high spots.

Also making the list was another newly wedded couple, Rupert Murdoch, 93, who tied the knot for a fifth time with Elena Zhukova, 67, a retired Russian molecular biologist, this month. Tatler noted: “When you’re the world’s most powerful media mogul, you have suitors falling at your feet forever.”

David Lammy, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, was at number two with his wife, the painter Nicola Green.

Model Poppy Delevingne, sister of actress Cara Delevingne, and Archie Keswick, made it to number 10, while England footballer Trent Alexander-Arnold and the daughter of Jude Law and Sadie Frost, the model Iris Law reached number five.

[From The Telegraph]

Just my opinion: I did not think that Hugh and Olivia’s wedding actually turned out to be the social event of the season or the biggest society wedding in years or whatever hype they said before the wedding. It really seemed like a relatively straight-forward “country wedding” at the local cathedral, with the bride and groom posing on plywood, and a nice reception at his estate. Now, I don’t doubt that Hugh and Olivia have a lot of financial/social/political power. He inherited one of the wealthiest estates in the UK. But Hugh and Olivia seem so low-key and like they’re not interested in flexing that power whatsoever. Anyway, it’s funny that zero royals made the top ten. While I know it doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things, Tatler is British society’s bible – that’s why the Princess of Wales freaked out the way she did in 2020 when Tatler did that “Catherine the Great” piece. It actually matters to the Windsors and the aristocrats that Tatler is saying that the Windsors have so little social clout.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “Tatler’s Social Power list included the Duke of Westminster & zero Windsors”

  1. Isn’t that interesting. They don’t even rank. The hits just keep coming.

  2. ML says:

    If Hugh and Olivia have been annointed -the- power couple by Tatler, even if they appeared too low key to be that powerful, it says a lot about how much unseen sway they hold amongst the British elite.

    The minute QE2 passed away it became blatantly obvious that the monarchy had declined. Having a slimmed down and literally diseased/ ill top just exacerbates the fall from power.

  3. Jais says:

    Wanting it to look like a chill country wedding seems very aristo. And the ceremony was. I want the reception details cuz that’s where I’d splash out.

  4. sevenblue says:

    I would understand why Kate isn’t in the list, since she literally disappeared from the public life and Will has no appeal without Kate. I am surprised Camilla isn’t. She made sure to be visible during the chaos of KP and was doing events for the King. This doesn’t sound good for the firm.

    • FancyPants says:

      “Her Majesty” will not be amused by this. I wonder what dirt she’s about to leak on the Westminsters…

  5. Lau says:

    Pretty sure the Wales would be more socially powerful if they were doing any actual work. The Westminsters being included when their weddings drew attention to them for months. Kate has barely been seen for months and William is too lazy to do anything at all.

    • Julia says:

      The Wales seem to be conducting their roles through photo shoots (often with their kids to get maximum attention) and photo opportunities with celebrities . This is great for publicity in the short term but in the long term what do they have to show for their time as working royals? Glossy photos and instagram reels but little in the way of tangible projects or work that leaves a lasting impact. Certainly nothing to compare to Invictus, the Prince’s Trust or the Duke of Edinburgh Awards.

  6. Steph says:

    Remember when Harry said in Spare something to the tune of you aren’t considered whole until you’re married? This is called “The Social Power List.” I assumed there would be individuals on it. Nope. Just couples. Weird

  7. JCallas says:

    The Wales were an international laughing stock for weeks. WHO knows what’s being whispered about them behind closed doors.

  8. Lady Digby says:

    Didn’t Will say he saw himself as some sort of social leader recently? He’ll be so disappointed about not featuring in this poll but at least he was one of the ten ushers at Hugh’s wedding?

  9. Blujfly says:

    William and Charles, are deeply isolated, insular, and have to be surrounded by yes man and sycophants. Neither has ever cultivated the fellow members of the British elite. And William has turned Kate the same. Harry and even Pippa were both more social and less paranoid.

  10. Hypocrisy says:

    Love it for them.. they have ruined their own image and standing in society.

  11. tealily says:

    Why do they both look like Jojo Siwa?

  12. Ben says:

    This list makes sense since the Grovesnor family made C&C dropped out from one of their weddings, they didn’t attend this wedding probably as a payback for that and William couldn’t shut up about getting to be an usher for a family that his father probably can’t stand. Yes the Duke outranks socially the Windsors.

  13. Lulu says:

    I used to read about great parties the queen mum had, and people would write about week or weekend hunting parties at Sandringham/Balmoral. But I don’t read about Charles or William throwing those big parties. Maybe that was just the times. The only time I read about William being social is attending a wedding – or vising the Rocksavages.

  14. PC says:

    This nonadmission says a lot about the Windsors. For one thing they failed at trying to make that homewreacking hoe into a housewife, much less queen material. The King and his Heir keep making an issue of a relative living in the US instead of ignoring him. The Heir’s wife had been missing for a half a year while they released phony photos and and made up sitings. The Heir is more concerned with being on the global stage while showing little concern for what’s happening in his own country and social group. When the Heir was involved in a society occasion he made it all about himself to score points against his brother. And finally, the Heir and his wife’s marriage is on shaky ground. The Windsors have become a real life reality show. There is nothing high society about them.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment