King Charles thinks that Harry’s refusal to bring his kids to the UK is ‘beyond contempt’

It’s fascinating to watch Buckingham Palace selectively lash out at Prince Harry. Currently, the palace is on a rather unhinged campaign against Harry because Harry spoke to ITV’s Tabloids on Trial documentary. Harry spoke about his lawsuits against the British tabloids, his unique position to seek justice on the British media’s decades of criminality, and he also spoke about the very real danger he and his family face in the UK, given RAVEC’s refusal to give them security when they’re in the UK. Harry said, in the documentary, that he “won’t bring my wife back to the UK because of the danger.” THAT is the part the palace has latched onto for several days, as they try to position King Charles as a sad grandfather who is being denied a relationship with Archie and Lili. As I said yesterday, this campaign from Charles is falling flat, but of course “sources” are telling the Daily Beast that what Harry is doing is “beyond contempt.” Some highlights:

Charles thinks Harry is trying to blackmail him: One friend of the king told The Daily Beast: “Harry has lost his security case in court, and is now trying the emotional blackmail route to get what he wants instead, cynically using the threat of Archie and Lilibet never meeting their grandfather again as a tactic to coerce the king into overruling RAVEC. The idea that the security forces are going to allow the Sussexes to be attacked by an acid-throwing or knife-wielding maniac on British soil is absurd, and Harry knows it. Using it as leverage, as a reason to withhold his kids from their grandfather, is beyond contempt. Charles is being treated for very serious cancer, so even if he could find the time, he cannot just fly to Los Angeles at the drop of a hat, like Harry can—and actually did earlier this year—in the other direction.”

The Sussex kids are being denied a relationship with Charles! The source, an old family friend of several generations of royals, added: “I wonder, when they are older, how those kids will feel about being denied a meaningful relationship with the King of England. To deprive them of that experience, with all its importance and heritage, seems very misguided. Of course he wants to see them, but if you force Charles to choose between his duty to the Crown and his personal feelings, he will choose the Crown every time—just as his mother did.”

Harry is threatening Charles! Another friend, a contemporary of the William and Harry generation of royals who used to be friendly with both brothers but is now loyal to William said: “When Harry was being kicked out of Frogmore Cottage, one of his lines was that Charles would never see the kids again. This is him going public with that threat.” When it was pointed out to the source that Harry didn’t mention his children in the TV interview, they replied, “It was clearly implied. This really isn’t about Meghan, who has no intention of ever coming back to England again.”

Sources close to Prince Harry: However, the source close to Harry told The Daily Beast: “Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life. He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats. While his role within the institution has changed, his profile as a member of the royal family has not. Nor has the threat to him and his family. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex personally fund a private security team for their family, yet that security cannot replicate the necessary police protection whilst in the U.K. The Duke remains willing to cover the cost of security, as not to impose on the British taxpayer. As is widely known, others who have left public office and have inherent threat risk receive police protection at no cost to them. The goal for Prince Harry has been simple—to ensure the safety of himself and his family while in the UK so his children can know his home country.”

This is accurate: Another source, a Palace insider, told The Daily Beast: “The whole affair is totally fascinating. I think Harry needs to ask himself why Charles hasn’t overruled RAVEC, which, for all the insistence that he couldn’t, he could, being the king and all. It’s because the last thing the Palace want is Harry and Meghan turning up unannounced on a regular basis or setting up a rival royal court in the U.K. As things stand now, they have to give 28 days notice when they are coming and essentially need to pre-agree with the cops where they are going to be, or might be, at all times. That suits the Palace down to the ground.”

[From The Daily Beast]

“I think Harry needs to ask himself why Charles hasn’t overruled RAVEC, which, for all the insistence that he couldn’t, he could, being the king and all.” Harry has already asked himself that question and he’s formulated his statements accordingly. Harry knows his dogsh-t father doesn’t give a f–k about him, his wife or his kids. Harry knows that the palace’s current hissy fit is about Harry constantly exposing his father as a cruel, petty and vindictive man. Harry also knows that the dumbass argument of “Harry is keeping his kids away from Charles” is a convenient feint for the larger issues discussed in Tabloids on Trial, which is the complicity of the Windsors in the larger story of press misconduct and criminality.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, ITV.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

99 Responses to “King Charles thinks that Harry’s refusal to bring his kids to the UK is ‘beyond contempt’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. ML says:

    Abusers like to set the boundaries that suit them and control others. Right Charles? And a “rival court?” Anyone here believe that H&M are planning a royal coup? Other than the guy who had himself a medieval coronation complete with anointing and who enjoys traipsing about in medieval style robes?

    • Blithe says:

      I’m confused. What would a “rival court” even look like? Seriously? Someone asks Meghan to christen a ship instead of asking Camilla? Conflicting garden parties with overlapping guest lists planned for the same day? What are these awful people really afraid of?

      • Lady Esther says:

        A rival court Harry and Meghan style would probably look like: Serious people doing actual work that has measurable and useful results. Serious people fulfilling their public duties with all of the different parts of British society. Serious people being glamorous when required and quiet or modest when not. Serious people not using helicopters as Ubers, not having 5 different houses with 89 staff for a small family, none of which they live in, skipping historically important events they couldn’t give a toss about and burning through staff like matches through feathers….and shutting down the game-playing against other family members via the British tabloid press.

        In other words: the monarchy the current British RF should be but isn’t…

      • Jais says:

        @blithe, competing garden parties with different guest lists😂. I mean that’s kind of it. Imagine if Meghan visited the new wing of mayhew, the one she donated money to in honor of her friend. The visit would overshadow anything the RF had planned. Charles and William cannot cope with anyone else having attention or seeming more popular.

      • Mslove says:

        A rival court would be having allies in parliament, I guess and maybe even spies at Chuck’s very own court, lol. Harry would also need to have a newspaper or two in his pocket for good measure. But Harry & Meghan aren’t playing those games.

      • pottymouth pup says:

        aren’t they complaining that H & M have set up a rival court in California? According to the BM, their mere existence is setting up a rival royal court

      • Yvette says:

        @pottymouth … “aren’t they complaining that H & M have set up a rival court in California?

        Yes. They complain about the ‘rival court’ everytime Harry and Meghan attend an event and get loads of media coverage (which they always do). They were particularly salty about it when after Harry and Meghan attended that Polo Challenge match in Florida (and ended up on the cover of Polo Magazine) and after the Sussex trip to Nigeria.

      • Honey says:

        What is a rival court & how does it even look? In short, for KP & even BP, a rival court would be Harry & Meghan upstaging & handing William & Kate their azzez every single day of the week. The latter couple just can’t compete. Meghan and Harry simply have a broader/wider footprint and outcomes people can point to as being successful and not just one-off things or gestures.

        I can imagine that it was hard for Harry to leave England & he probably didn’t think they’d be outcasts for so long, especially if his grandmother had lived and been lucid. However, I can also imagine Meghan saying “leave this little island to them, baby, we’ll simply take the world”.

      • Cara says:

        My friend had a garden party the other day. Does this mean she is setting up a rival court? She does do good works for charities and shows compassion and has empathy … which is all very suspicious. OMG! She’s must be an anarchist!! In fact, I know many good and kind and self-less women. Oh noooooooo ….

      • ella says:

        They’re staring hard at their Game of Thrones War table and feel nature’s inevitable force upon monarchies.

        They know their once hospitable environment in the decade of Tory rule is gone. Coddling Tory support soon withers.

        Change is charging at them faster from the outer world and their former lives are succumbing to a rapid succession of crises.

        Nature seeks balance by withering down a pride of lions after they force out their youngest male whom they know will be back with a stronger pride…..or rival court. Believe it.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Lol @Cara. 4th of July, my husband and me set up a “rival royal court”. Most of our neighbors go away for the weekend. Except one ahole who shoots off fireworks to midnight. Our royal court held steadfast. The smell from our Weber Grill overshadowed everyone who was within our vicinity. We enjoyed a day of mostly quiet and celebration of our Independence from that other place. LOL. Any Aussies, want to share grilled shrimp recipes-feel free. It’s one of my 4th of July things to make.

    • KeKe Swan says:

      I do rather like the idea of Harry landing at Dover and raising an army to march against William… lol!

    • Proud Mary says:

      The “rival court” bit, is their acknowledgment that, despite the Firm’s efforts, they’ve been unable to bring the Sussexes down.

      • Pinkosaurus says:

        I think their obsession with a competing royal court shows how much the palaces and Rota think the battlefield is press coverage and public opinion, very stupidly insisting that there can only be a winner and a loser. Regardless of what is going on behind the scenes, it would be such a win for the left behinds to congratulate and take credit for all of the Sussexes accomplishments. Instead, their massive egos get in the way and they deeply damage and expose their own brand. They are SO bad at this.

      • Baby Doll says:

        Bingo!!!!!

    • Flower says:

      The rival court Chuckles is shitting himself is scenes like the ones in Nigeria and Jamaica.

      Compare those trips to how Kate & William were received and then you get an idea as to just how useless the Royals are.

      No further comment on Archie and Lili because at the end of the day who TF in their right mind would take their kids in the UK after all the hate that Charles has allowed the tabs to whip up?

  2. Tessa says:

    Charles they are not just harry s kids but Meghan s too. If Charles had put stop to how Meghan was treated by the tabs they would not have left. Isn’t Charles doing what he is accusing harry of doing
    Charles pulled their security

    • sunnyside up says:

      And he pulled their safe house.

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        And he gave away their location to the press when they were trying to lay low in Canada. Pulled their security, pulled their funding, left them stranded in the early days of the pandemic, then faked Covid to get Harry to call him… and straight afterwards went to the press and they all knew where he was.

        Leading to the Freedom Flight – Cluck didn’t count on Tyler Perry as a modern day Knight in Shining Armor.

        The real reason Charles is this hopping mad 4+ years later is that Harry survived. And then thrived. Unlike the first time he pulled this exact gambit on a family member.

  3. Get Real says:

    There are a lot of things beyond contempt in this mess of a family and that is not one of them.
    Good on Harry for keeping his children away from that toxic waste dump.

    • Ciotog says:

      Imagine thinking that expressing public contempt about your child makes you look good.

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        They keep talking about Cluck and Cloppy being dedicated to their image-refurbishing; I have yet to see any true evidence of it… because every time he goes moaning to the media about Harry, he’s basically shooting himself in the d-ck.

        It’s an own goal, every time any of the BRF or the tabs put out articles like this. They make a mockery of the monarchy and Harry look like what he is: the reasonable one.

  4. Afken says:

    This is just posturing. Charles took Frogmore from them, he also despite railing against Harry and Meghan’s revelations loves to talk to the press himself. When he was going through the cash for honours scandal he was happy enough to brief to the media about his visit with Lili. He will do that again any chance he has to protect himself. He gets to have his poor grandpa moment but he didn’t care to visit before he had cancer, before he was king and before the Sussex’s left. He gets to have his surrogates go to the media to portray him sympathetically but the point will always remain: if he wanted to, he would.

    • booboocita says:

      What was it Harry said about Charles and the tabloids in Spare? “How he hated their hate, but oh how he loved their love.” Or something like that. Chucky Boy hates any media criticism of his monarchy and hates the press in general, but oh, how he loves it when the RR paint him sympathetically or in any positive light. What a pathetic creature he is.

    • Flower says:

      More and more I am convinced that one of the reasons Charles took Frogmore to them so they’d be forced to use rooms at Buckingham Palace where he could surveil, control and sell them out to the Rota Rats.

      • Jais says:

        Not sure if it’s true, it could be complete bs, but “it has been reported” that Harry’ has requested the use of rooms at KP. And been denied. Again, this could be complete lies but I’ve seen it reported in a few screenshots of articles.

  5. Tessa says:

    Charles pulled their security before the Oprah interview the Netflix program and spare.

    • sunnyside up says:

      Frequently the tabloids like to ignore the time lines. They can be very important.

  6. equality says:

    So would the poor children fly all the way to the UK to get 15 whole minutes with Chuck? KC really doesn’t want to start a discussion about things that are “beyond contempt”.

  7. Trying to cover his ass for taking away the security and their home but Harry is beyond contempt for not bringing his children to UK? I think NOT! Chuckles is beyond contempt and no amount of crying about not seeing the grandchildren is going to change that fact! The world sees what a complete ass is Chuckles.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles and William and Kate would not give the children the time of day. Even if harry and Meghan brought them over. Kate who supposedly loves babies did not even walk a few steps to meet baby Archie on that polo field. Then the media would write disparaging things and Charles would not lift a finger to stop it.

    • Dani-D says:

      Exactly! Nobody is keeping the Sussex children from their grandfather. If Charles is desperate to see and hug his grandchildren and misses them so much, he can get on a plane and come to the US because it’s obvious that Harry will not have proper security for his family in the UK!

  8. SarahCS says:

    It’s giving strong ‘stop making me hit you’ vibes.

    How do they think this is a good look for Charles?

  9. Carol Mengel says:

    Charles can’t be bothered providing security to his own son and his family on the rare times they would visit the UK but Charles is providing security to his POS sexual abuser brother. What’s that say about where Charles’s loyalty lies?

  10. sevenblue says:

    Harry’s sh*t father is mostly no different from Meghan’s sh*t father. Only thing separating them, Charles has the power to put Harry and his family in danger if he wishes so. Imagine your son can’t bring his children into his own country because there are numerous death threats against them and all you do is conveniently briefing the reporters about those children whenever you want to change headlines. Charles was a sh*t husband and father. It is no surprising he is also a sh*t grandfather.

  11. JENNIFER says:

    I don’t think Charles cares about seeing those kids. Didn’t he spend years in the UK not seeing William’s kids?
    Why do Charles’s spin doctors and Thomas Markle like to evoke Harry and Meghan’s children? Why not concentrate on the grandchildren that are accessible to them?

  12. Snuffles says:

    “ The idea that the security forces are going to allow the Sussexes to be attacked by an acid-throwing or knife-wielding maniac on British soil is absurd, and Harry knows it. ”

    There was literally a deadly knife attack against children yesterday in the UK. It’s not absurd. Harry’s fears are extremely valid.

    https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/29/uk/northern-england-stabbing-intl

    • sevenblue says:

      If they don’t have security while visiting UK, how are security forces gonna stop some maniac who decides to attack them?

      • bisynaptic says:

        🎯 wondering the same thing. Do the security forces operate out in the ether?

    • Flower says:

      The reality is that NO ONE in the BRF or Rota care about Harry’s children. They are the spares of the spare so they don’t even humanise them.

      They just want pictures so that they can commoditise them.

      Also I suspect H&M do not want their pictures out there for as long as possible to avoid them becoming targets.

      • Christine says:

        Well said. As of right now, we have a vague idea what Archie and Lili look like currently. That makes them SAFE, which is the opposite of what that family and the British media wants.

  13. Inge says:

    The idea that the security forces are going to allow the Sussexes to be attacked by an acid-throwing or knife-wielding maniac on British soil is absurd

    – a third child has just died thanks to a knife wielding maniac on british soil you insensitive t… Sykes.

    • Julia says:

      When Harry came to UK in February to see his father he got a police escort to the palace but when he left the palace to go to his hotel he was on his own for the rest of his stay, with just his private security. How can the police protect him from attack if they are not there?

      • PrincessK says:

        When Harry came over for Invictus, it appeared he had full security. I noticed a police helicopter hovering overhead while he was greeting members of the crowd.

  14. Hypocrisy says:

    Prince Harry’s mission against the tabloid presses criminal tactics is working. He has won cases and gotten a lot of evidence that was covered up, entered into court documents and that is now public record. Look at what happened with the WaPo guy, Prince Harry and his team have brought his cover up into court documents. Eventually Chuck will have egg on his face over his choice not to support his youngest son and his family. He may not get a Levenson 2 but he is accomplishing something others have failed to do, getting the proof of the crimes entered into court documents for everyone to see. Chuck doesn’t deserve to see grandchildren he put in danger even if the security is reinstated.

  15. Mads says:

    The last paragraph in the excerpt is the closest to the truth of the matter; with the current situation Charles and the institution have the power to curtail Harry’s visits to the UK and they are 100% certain Meghan and the children will never visit. It suits their agenda.

    • Jais says:

      And what wasn’t mentioned was that Harry has actually done that. Requested security 28 days in advance and still been denied security by RAVEC.

      • Becks1 says:

        And requested housing in royal residences (which would have security) and has been denied that as well.

        This is about punishment and control and more and more people are starting to see that.

    • GTWiecz says:

      Yes. Just petty revenge from a horrible father and grandfather. As if he cares about the children of the spare. Please. Don’t worry Chuck, your “other” grandchildren will grow up and find out what you did. They’ll despise you. Your reputation is also in tatters.

  16. aquarius64 says:

    Charles is mad he won the Bad Grandpa title from Toxic Tom. Sorry Chuck you dragged your feet for six months for Archie and Lili getting their prince and princess titles, and you were forced into it when it was announced you, Can, Billy and Kate didn’t attend Lili’s christening in CA. Taking away Frogmore was a dumb and vindictive move too. What saddens me is when Archie and Lili are old enough to read the online garbage they will see how awful the Windsors and the Markles have been. You shouldn’t be surprised when they turn 18 the kids would want nothing to do with them.

    • GTWiecz says:

      They developed no bond with these two old men and they will never miss them.

      • Christine says:

        Exactly. I told my son how my father treated my Mom, and, huge shock!!, he doesn’t want a relationship with him. It’s not a difficult concept.

  17. Amy Bee says:

    Charles showed no interest in Harry’s children when they were in the UK so this screaming and crying about Harry keeping him from his grandchildren narrative is not going to work.

  18. KeKe Swan says:

    KC3 is just projecting at this point. HE’S the one whose behavior is “beneath contempt.”

  19. s808 says:

    Charlie is just mad he won’t have his version of photos with all the grandkids. A&L can’t even be photoshopped in. Can’t be the nation’s grandpa when you’re actively shunning 2 of your grandchildren and their parents.

    • sevenblue says:

      QE2 would always take big family photos. It is crazy to think Charles doesn’t have anything like that as a King. He is a lonely King, far from a unifying figure.

      • GTWiecz says:

        Like someone said earlier, many men abandon the children from a first marriage. And some do it to please the new wife. Charles only cares about Camilla. He made his bed now sleep on it. I don’t think even the Wales children have a lot of contact with him.

  20. Pinkosaurus says:

    This just feels like the Rota 🐀 🐀🐀 writing an article about how bigly mad they are that they can’t sell pictures of the Sussex children, and criticize and negatively compare them to William’s brood, and then attributing it to BP because they know BP won’t push back. The 💩 british media are the ones desperate to drag Meghan and her children back to abuse for clicks. I’m sure Charles doesn’t think about them at all, and Camilla is thrilled to have them gone after she worked so hard to alienate Charles from his children.

    • GTWiecz says:

      One more case of a second wife who wants to alimenta-te the husband from his children, his old friends, and even his family. It’s all about control.

  21. Eurydice says:

    Well, this is an interesting structure. Start out with all the ways Charles is a victim and end with how Charles is the perpetrator.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Eurydice, exactly! This is an article quoting sources from both sides and the Sussex source was actually someone who knows them now. The palace source confirming that King Snubby can override RAVEC is astonishing.

      Wow, an article that clearly articulates both sides, but it is clear when you’re finished reading it who the real problem is. I’m gobsmacked!

      • ABritGuest says:

        The Sussex “source” was actually Harry’s own public statement about why he issued his security judicial review.

        Charles doesn’t care about a relationship with the Sussexes kids. Let’s remember that Harry & Meghan wanted to bring them to the uk when they were visiting for wellchild & one young world in 2022 before the queen died. Ravec which Charles & William have representatives on- denied the security arrangements that would enable them to safely bring the kids.

        Charles also evicted them from a secure home. So this nonsense is the press trying to shift blame for why they won’t get a grandpa Charles photo op & trying to provide him cover. Hopefully they will direct their ire for the people actually to blame. The daily beast did indicate that by saying the security issues could be solved by the palace but they want to control Harry & prevent him & Meghan distracting from the others whilst in the uk

  22. Maxine Branch says:

    The Sussexes kids are very lucky and will be grateful to their parents for shielding them from the gutter press and the toxicity associated with Harry’s birth family. I can visualize no instant where they would wish they were involved in the U.K. mess re familia relationship. As thoughtful parents pretty sure the Sussexes will have had many conversations with their kids to explain why this was necessary. You cannot miss what you never had and am pretty sure their kids will have a very full life of freedom from press intrusion and be very well versed in how to navigate through life with the heritage they inherited.

  23. Cam says:

    I know Harry is suing the tabloids over their illegal activities. But in an ideal world, I wish Harry would just stop talking about his father or that family or even visiting the UK. Just live his life with Meghan and his children.

    • sevenblue says:

      He was getting interviewed by a reporter about tabloid lawsuits. He can’t say no question about his family, because tabloids lawsuit didn’t happen in a vacuum. His family is part of it. He doesn’t want to cut all his ties to his own country because of the tabloids.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Cam, he didn’t want to talk about the brf, but he was being interviewed as sevenblue says. I don’t see why Harry would have to stop the lawsuits, which is what would happen if he didn’t go to the UK. He will be testifying in court in person.

      I think what he’s doing in exposing the bm is necessary. I hope all of what the papers have been hiding is exposed and people know what’s been going on. I suspect Harry is hoping that if it all come to light that the papers will stop the illegal activities. One can hope.

      I hope the US media is watching this carefully. The clear lean to the right in the msm is alarming and I wonder if their next move will be to start telling lies through ‘sources’.

    • Jaded says:

      There is no ideal world when your life is being turned upside down by your own birth family in cahoots with the tabloids. There is no ideal world when your wife and children are being constantly threatened with death if they set foot in England because security isn’t provided. His legal battles show that he’s not afraid to fight for his and his family’s safety against the bottom-feeding scumbags that promote this kind of undeserved hatred.

      • Christine says:

        All of this. I can’t imagine knowing there are people who wish my children were dead, and my family not caring at all.

    • Tessa says:

      Harry has had to be proactive to make it clear he was not going to the UK to counter the endless speculation about his coming over to visit

    • ABritGuest says:

      The palace would love if Harry stopped visiting the uk but fact is he’s done nothing wrong for this attempt at exile & in the same position I’d fight for the right to safely visit my homeland too. Don’t forget Harry also fought for the country. He has British interests (charities & non profit) & family (not just Charles & William) & friends he has every right to be able to see. Not all of them can just fly over to Montecito as & when

      I agree I would prefer he didn’t talk about the Windsors due to the inevitable backlash but in this case i also think it’s important that the public know of extent of the corrupt relationship that the monarchy & the tabloids have. It’s same as the hold these press barons have on the government so his suing the royal family’s tabloid partners is actually a big factor in this family rift & the public should know this & why.

      • Jais says:

        Hard agree. Harry has every right to safely visit the UK. There is more to the uk than his shitty family.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @Cam, in an ‘ideal world’, the British Media would actually report facts. He answered a question very diplomatically.

  24. Brassy Rebel says:

    When I read that quote about the security forces wouldn’t allow any kind of attack on Harry’s family, I wondered what security forces the source was talking about 🤔. Has Charles arranged for magical security to appear in case of attack?

  25. Lau says:

    Charles is pathetic but not in the sense that you root for him on that subject, just in the sense that you have to side-eye every public move he makes concerning his own grandchildren.

  26. Molly says:

    “SO EVEN IF HE COULD FIND THE TIME”.

    Those, the words of the heartbroken grandfather being denied his grandchildren…

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Molly, King Snubby didn’t have the time to see Harry during the 10-year Invictus anniversary. Isn’t that an interesting new lie they’re putting out there that Meghan will not return. She’s never said that. Harry just said why Meghan (and the kids) won’t be travelling to the UK. They need to learn to use logic and critical thinking.

  27. MsIam says:

    Wasn’t there a kidnapping attempt on Princess Anne? Intruders in the Queen’s bedroom and on palace grounds? Eggs thrown at Charles and Camilla? What if THAT was acid? The Royals have had several security breeches and they weren’t facing the press whipping up hatred against them. The fact that they don’t feel The Sussexes need high level protection is what is contemptible. But I guess this is the only card Charles feels he has left to play against Harry, even if it risks Harry’s life. Even boot lickers like Tom Sykes are starting to subtly point that out, of course after listing all the usual excuses.

  28. QuiteContrary says:

    I think a grandfather who takes away secure accommodations for his grandchildren is “beyond contempt,” but, hey, potato po-tah-to.

  29. Beverley says:

    Charles was uninterested in spending any time with Prince Archie when the infant still lived in England, and likely hasn’t yet met Princess Lili. And he stripped away the Sussexes’ security while they were in Vancouver. Not to mention the nursery fire that could have claimed Archie’s life in South Africa. Nope, Charles does hope they all “go away” someday…one way or another .

    The false, hallow way Charles is clutching his pearls in fake judgement about Harry’s statement tells tales on himself. I think KC3 actually still wants to harm those children, that’s WHY the reoccurring laments written by palace stenographers 🐀🐀🐀 He got away with Diana, but it’s far more difficult to harm people when you have no access to them.

    Dogsh*t Charlie didn’t think this whole thing through. It never occurred to him that his financial abuse and security fuckery would push the Sussexes away from the Firm and away from the UK, possibly permanently. Everyone – including “anointed by god” Chuckles – figured they would come crawling back – defeated, frightened and ready to obey. But alas, H&M flipped the script. Charles may never see those children again. Sure, they’ll be free to reach out to him when they come of age, but after hearing and reading about their corrupt, heartless, racist grandfather all their lives, I hope they choose to ghost him.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Beverley, and the kids will find it out on their own once they’re old enough to get on the internet and do a little research. Think about what they’ll read and how they’ll think about the way their Mom, and themselves, were written about. I don’t know if the kids will ever have warm feelings toward the UK.

      • Beverley says:

        Agreed, Saucy&Sassy. Imagine how the Sussex children will feel someday when they can understand and learn that their grandfather and their paternal relatives passively allowed so much vitriol and hatred to be stirred up towards them and their mother. With one edict their grandfather could’ve stopped the media abuse, but Charles the Cruel would never cross his media puppeteers. These people will seem like monsters to them – irrational, vindictive monsters.

        I wouldn’t be surprised if Archie and Lili want nothing to do with their royal relatives when they grow up.

  30. HuffnPuff says:

    Let’s look at this logistically. When traveling with children, you have to have things figured out. Kids do best on schedules so you don’t want to be scrambling for food at the last minute or trying to find a toddler safe bed. When they had Frogmore, the Sussexes had a place that they could have ready for them. It had built in security and outdoor space as well. KFC took that away from them. Now their options are to give a month’s notice to stay at some location on royal grounds. Given that Knot Cot was a shack, I wouldn’t assume that the Sussexes would be staying anywhere “nice”. I also wouldn’t assume that the place would be safe for small children. They would also have to rely on untrustworthy individuals for anything they need. The other option is to stay offsite. The Sussexes could control their environment at least but they would have to use their own protection that would have no knowledge of any national or personal threats. Also each option just gives the press more to cluck about. If they stay on-site, they’re robbing from British taxpayers. If they stay offsite, they’re saying royal property isn’t good enough for them. The second option also makes things more dangerous as the press will work overtime to try to out their lodging location. Gee, I wonder why they don’t want to visit???

    And mind you, this was a gift from Harry’s grandmother that KFC took away. If Harry did threaten to not let KFC see the kids, I don’t know of anyone who would be cool with their dad snatching something their grandmother gave them. I think the logistics and lack of safety are the bigger drivers of them not visiting. KFC is to blame for that.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      HuffnPuff, I’m sure the lack of safety is why Harry said that King Snubby wouldn’t see the kids again. King Snubby knew exactly what he was doing.

    • Blubb says:

      HuffnPuff, the one house I am thinking off is Althorp or one of the houses of Diana’s sisters. There they would be welcomed. And if they managed to come unnoticed… And m

    • Christine says:

      He wasn’t even threatening, he was speaking from a place of hurt after Chuck kicked the Sussexes out of Frogmore. He was legitimately asking his dad if he even wanted to see his grandchildren, and WOW, did Charles give him a loud and clear answer. He is a piece of garbage.

  31. Kelly says:

    My father flew in from Guatemala the week I had my son so he could be there because that’s what real fathers do.

    When Diana stole his thunder, it was all about the poor Prince of Wales not receiving his due. I doubt he would make any effort with any of his grandkids if they weren’t in close proximity.

  32. Rnot says:

    QEII was a family matriarch. I think Charles is confused and angry that he didn’t inherit the respect and deference along with the crown, but he isn’t any kind of patriarch. He’s rejected that role for years with his slim down plans, distance from his young sons, and open sense of his own superiority combined with chronic self-pity.

    The queen took care of her family. Charles is only loyal to Charles, and by extension Camilla. He’s not respectable, so why would anyone defer to his wishes? All he has is the crown, not good relationships. It’s so ridiculous it’s practically Shakespearean tragedy.

  33. Well Wisher says:

    Why the rage? Insecurity?
    It was the same children that was supposed to be untitled, until the late Queen insisted that it could not be done while she is alive…..

  34. TN Democrat says:

    Edward/Wallis were consistently referred to as a rival court and the same excuses were used as the reason they were not allowed to live in in the uk after Edward abdicated the throne nearly 90 years ago. Lort. The Windsors are a tedious lot. Comparing Harry/Meghan to Edward/Walliis misses the mark by a mile, but the comparison smears both H and M. Harry was put on display since before birth and should be guaranteed lifelong security that is not contingent on kissing Willy or Chuck’s ring. To yank security after inflaming the nutters with planted derogatory stories (after what happened to his mother) is just beyond belief. This current batch of stories is an attempt to get pictures of Harry’s kids. Charles does not care or he would have made different life choices.

  35. Over it says:

    I can’t stand this spineless dog-sht man baby . Chucky gets on my last nerve. Your hateful ass threw your own son and his family out of their house and you took away their security. Archie and lily will only wonder as they grow up how could the amazing loving father that they have in Harry could possibly have shared dna with dog sh-it Charles .

    • Christine says:

      It never fails to amaze me that Harry ended up a champion for others given the family he grew up in.

  36. Vixxo says:

    It’s beyond contempt to kick your child out of his home that he paid for structural repairs and rental and not reimburse him. Then go to the newspaper to cry about cancer that you were diagnosed with after you did all that. How often do you see Wilnot’s children?

    Vile man. Choose duty please. Choose Camilla. Leave the Sussexes alone.

  37. Dierski says:

    He and his court are such losers.

    An alternate headline:

    Deadbeat grandparent, King Charles, whose wealth, time, and resources are nearly boundless, refuses to travel to US to visit his grandchildren.

    • Anna says:

      And thinks that two toddlers are like suitcases that can be brought over. On 12+h flight and adjusting to completely different time zone. I could do this to my babies if we had a loving relatives who could now travel themselves. In every other situation – the adult has to come.

  38. sunnyside up says:

    So Harry didn’t threaten that his father would never see the children, “it was implied” says a friend of William. So William’s friend knows which side his bread is buttered on. The King can go to Australia via California and stop over for a day or two, if he really wants to see his grandchildren.