Sony fully supports Blake Lively after she screened ‘IEWU: The Lively Cut’ in Texas

What does this Blake Lively stuff remind you of? For me, it’s sort of like the Hilaria Baldwin stuff in late 2020 and early 2021 – suddenly, people were going back through all of Hilaria’s old interviews and doing deep dives on all of the Hilaria-was-never-Spanish lore. While Blake Lively never lied about being “from Spain,” there is a similar deep-dive into the gossip history around Blake. Like… what was up with Blake and Leighton Meester on Gossip Girl? They apparently didn’t get along at all towards the latter part of the series, so much so they the would barely even speak to each other. The Mail is on the case – go here to read.

Meanwhile, the current Blake situation is that we still don’t know exactly what went down between Blake, Justin Baldoni and the cast of It Ends With Us. Many people around the production maintain this idea that Baldoni and Lively’s larger falling out happened in postproduction, especially when Blake brought in her own editor to create IEWU: The Lively Cut. It was also clear (to me) that Team Blake had already started an increasingly loud whisper campaign about Baldoni, one which scared him enough to hire a crisis management team this week. Well, speaking of all of that, the Hollywood Reporter has an interesting piece about the studio giving a lot of full-throated support for Blake, especially after she screened IEWU: The Lively Cut to Colleen Hoover’s groupies in Texas in June.

In mid-June, star-producer Blake Lively traveled to Dallas to attend author Colleen Hoover’s Book Bonanza for a Q&A in the lead-up to the August release It Ends With Us. Lively surprised the 2,000-plus attendees when she announced they could screen a rough cut of the movie adaptation the following night. The screening of the movie — the first of Hoover’s popular novels to hit the screen — proved to be a stroke of marketing genius for Sony, which bought rights to release the movie from Wayfarer Studios, whose co-founder, Justin Baldoni, both directed and stars in the film.

“Colleen Hoover’s Book Bonanza and her fans sparked the fire that was the beginning of the cultural movement,” says Josh Greenstein, a veteran marketer and president of Sony Pictures Entertainment Motion Picture Group.

Absent, however, from the Dallas gathering was Baldoni. The version shown that night was Lively’s preferred rough cut of the movie.

By the time the movie opened Aug. 9, an ugly war had erupted on TikTok and other social media platforms pitting Baldoni and Lively against each other. Many took aim at Lively, despite reports that some cast and crewmembers, including Lively, felt uncomfortable over Baldoni’s behavior on set.

Sony is fully in sync with Lively. “Blake, Colleen and so many women put so much effort into this remarkable movie, working selflessly from the start to ensure that such an important subject matter was handled with care. Audiences love the movie. Blake’s passion and commitment to advancing the conversation around domestic violence is commendable,” Sony Pictures Entertainment Chair-CEO Tony Vinciquerra told The Hollywood Reporter. “We love working with Blake, and we want to do 12 more movies with her.”

Sony’s marketing campaign — in staying true to Hoover’s book — conveyed that It Ends With Us isn’t a story of victimhood, but a story of redemption. It traverses falling in love, becoming an entrepreneur, friendship and family, alongside pain and trauma. “Lily is a survivor and a victim, but that doesn’t define her, as she is in charge of her identity and her story. These themes were important to the campaign,” says one source connected to the film’s rollout.

Sources have told THR that there was a fracture between Baldoni and Lively in the postproduction stage, wherein two different cuts of the movie emerged. Lively commissioned a cut of the movie from editor Shane Reid, who was an editor on Deadpool & Wolverine, according to multiple sources.

[From THR]

This reads to me like why Baldoni hired crisis managers in the first place, because he was afraid he was going to get squished by the studio taking Blake’s side and throwing him under the bus. Sony is obviously doing the most to stay on Blake’s good side, and not only that, Sony is seemingly doing a lot (here and behind-the-scenes) to keep the arguments from devolving into petty, personal attacks. It suits everyone involved if the story is “Blake and Justin disagreed about which edit to use, that’s the big problem” rather than Justin fat-shamed Blake and gave her a lingering kissor Blake is a mean-girl bully.”

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

127 Responses to “Sony fully supports Blake Lively after she screened ‘IEWU: The Lively Cut’ in Texas”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Arizona says:

    it reminds me of Amber Heard, not Hilaria. right down to dredging up old interviews to prove she’s terrible.

    interesting that everyone wants to focus on the times she didn’t get along with co stars, and ignore the times she did – for instance, all of the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants girls seem very close still (see how they all supported America last year). I don’t like everyone that I work with, do you?

    this whole thing is tired to keep talking about unless there’s something more concrete than “they unfollowed me on Instagram” and “I was upset he asked about my weight.” at least with don’t worry darling there were videos and emails!

    • Lemons says:

      This does not remind me of Amber Heard because the execs are behind Blake and she seems to be very in control of the narrative surrounding this film. What she is not in control over is her own actions apparently which are leaking about weird things happening on set with her costar (but none of which sound abusive), to having her husband work on the project, to launching a haircare line, and dressing up like Barbie for a film about DV.

      Sure, maybe the crisis management team is reminding us all that Blake is not known as a good person…but Blake isn’t helping by mean girling her way through this promo tour and treating the film’s subject material as…fluff (I don’t have a better word for it).

      • seaflower says:

        ITA. Plus the arrogance and audacity of doing her own cut of the movie and even screening it.

      • AlpineWitch says:

        Exactly. But there are a few people here who want to support this woman and her right to erase DV from the film.

        I’m a DV/rape survivor and to put it politely this mess from BL has really irritated me to no end.

      • JP says:

        Agreed. Our society is prone to blaming women for everything, but that doesn’t mean that Lively hasn’t been behaving poorly.

      • Andy Dufresne says:

        I 💯 agree with you, @Lemons!

      • Kitten says:

        Exactly. People are trying so hard to get the Amber Heard comparison to stick but there is literally ZERO similarity between the two situations beyond the fact that both JB and JD used the same crisis management team.

        MY GOD Amber Heard WISHES she got the Blake Lively treatment. The woman’s entire career and life was destroyed because of that man. Blake and Ryan are doing just f*cking fine, guys.

      • TheOriginalMia says:

        Exactly, Lemons! This situation is nothing like Amber and Angelina’s. They were physically and emotionally abused. Blake isn’t. She hasn’t been a nice person and that’s coming back to bite her in the ass.

      • Kittenmom says:

        Yes, Lemons, exactly my feelings on this situation.

      • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

        💯 lemons

      • Get Real says:

        💯.
        The studio is only behind her because the film is making bank.

      • Lauren says:

        The studio is backing her because her husband’s movies consistently make a profit. That’s it.

    • Jais says:

      In the case of amber heard and Angelina Jolie there was evidence of physical abuse committed against them. And then there abusers started an online abuse campaign. So that’s not exactly what’s happening here. All we know so far is that this a disagreement between coworkers. There’s no evidence of abuse. We don’t know what happened except for whispers and insinuations. But yes, there’s has been an online pile-on against Blake. I’m not a fan of watching a pile-on of anyone. Whether it’s organic, coming from Justin’s shady pr team, or a combination of both, idk.

      • Jais says:

        Grammar edit🙄- Their* abusers started an online pr campaign.

      • Mil says:

        It is the same treatment of women.
        My guess is that in 2,3 years, the director will face more severe abuse allegations. Something happened on that set. Blake’s not an innocent lamb, but this never happened. I don’t even get his message. She’s bad? Uh, whatever.

      • Jais says:

        Umm, until there is actually evidence, what are we supposed to say? If something happened on set and it comes out, then okay. But that’s not the case in this moment so I’m not going to base my opinion on supposing that abuse allegations will emerge in 3-4 years. BL has not gone on the record about any abuse.

      • L Williams says:

        Jais .Yes there is evidence of abuse against Angelina Jolie. It’s in regards to the fight on the plane ride that her children witnessed. There was a incident report filed. Secondly his children have renounced his last name, both his adopted children and his birth children. And if you think his kids are being influenced by Jolie. Guess again most kids grow up and can recognize their parents faults. And Pitt must have some major ones for them to renounce taking his last name.

      • Jais says:

        Oh I know there’s evidence about Pitt. Noooo argument from me there. I meant there’s no evidence that BL was abused. So comparing her to AH and AJ does not make sense.

    • JW says:

      I find it insulting that you are comparing Blake Lively to an actual survivor of DV. Blake Lively, who has done her level best to minimize and suppress the themes of DV in marketing this movie, who refuses to engage with the DV community at all about these issues right now. Blake Lively has not been abused.

      • kif says:

        Piling on can be either be good or bad. It happens because one person or victim had the courage to speak out and the rest usually follows. Blake did something wrong – a lot of people are calling her out. Her doing something wrong is not even subjective. Even she knows she did wrong because after more than a week of the backlash, she suddenly realised that her way of being dismissive of DV in her dumb movie and posted some hotline numbers for DV. How easy could it have been tro actually say that in interviews – she’s not an expert, just an actress portraying someone so she encourages viewers to seek the proper guidance. The way she will fleetingly mention “Lili is not just a victim” and pivot to another topic is very dismissive. She was not even willing to acknowledge it. For me, this is the misogyny and not the public and social media calling her to task.

        If not for the pile-on and public backlash she will not post that DV info on her IG. So thank goodness for that pile-on. Some women do have power and they can be perpetrators of abuse. Feminism is not about defending all women regardless of.

    • Andrea says:

      Amber is terrible.

      • JW says:

        One does not have to like Amber Heard or anyone as a person to believe they have been subject to domestic violence. What is being furthered here is the trope of the “perfect victim”—that if you find someone unlikeable, they are less believable.

        That is straight out of the Depp playbook.

        I find it interesting that all of a sudden there are a ton of Blake fangirls showing up trying to equate people calling her out on her BS with actual domestic violence, when nobody but nobody who questioned whether she was pulling a CYA bullying campaign on Justin Baldoni was saying “oh now Justin is the DV victim here.” Why? Because that would have been ludicrous. Because calling people out for their PR strategies is not domestic violence. Because asking someone about their weight if you have to lift them in a professional setting is not domestic violence.

        It is so incredibly out of touch, and offensive to actual survivors of abuse, to draw these comparisons that it could only come from the same camp that thought that marketing this film as a hearts and flowers chick flick was a good idea in the first place. Come get your girl.

      • Mightymolly says:

        The thing about the weight seems really misleading. She’s very tall, probably often taller than leading men.

    • Sarah says:

      I am sorry but this is NOTHING like the Amber situation at all!!! And to compare them is a little gross, as of now there has been zero indication of anything abusive happening on set from either camp. This truly boils down to creative differences and the old interviews started WAY BEFORE the crisis PR because THE AUDIENCE was offended with out BLAKE was approaching a film about DV.

      This isn’t remotely the same, I get you are a fan of Blake but to compare them is just gross, especially when Blake isn’t being smeared, she isn’t being denied her story of abuse. People are pointing out she had a terrible PR strategy (she did) and is often rude in interviews (she is) this is similar to what JLo went through this past summer not anything Amber did.

      It also all could have been avoided if they waited to unfollow him until after the press for the movie.

    • Michelle says:

      Reminds me of AH as well, people are picking apart Blake Lively online and on socials. Baldoni is the victim in the story. He hired the same firm as Depp did smear AH, so it’s not a surprise.
      If things seem black and white (Blake is bad, Baldoni is good) it feels like a smear to me. Women get blamed and shamed too often. My opinion is probably unpopular but it seems like a pile on. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.

      • Jais says:

        Pile-ons are unpleasant. There can be many different reasons for a pile-on. But in the case of AH, she was a victim of DV and then piled upon and gas-lighted by her abuser. Blake Lively is not a victim of DV as far as we know. What happened to AH and BL are not exactly the same and that’s an important distinction.

    • Gem says:

      @Arizona @MIL
      No matter how hard you two try, facts don’t support the innocent Blake a victim of misogyny and PR driven pile on here. Nobody forced Blake to make a cut of a movie she doesn’t even own rights to. She did it. The screening of a rough cut Baldoni didn’t agree to stinks. Nobody forced Blake to say bring your girlfriends and wear your florals to watch the film. She did. Nobody told her to launch her haircare product and promote Betty Buzz with cute advertisements and party. She did that. She was the one that made tone deaf comments about the film when promoting it downplaying the DV aspect or straight up mocking the question she was receiving. She was getting tons of backlash for it even before people picked up on the Baldoni drama. That bizarre mock interview Ryan did to promote the film was also her idea. The smear campaign against Baldoni began as the backlash grew. Baldoni only hired a crisis PR manager 72 hours ago. Unless the crisis PR team is equipped with time travel, they didn’t create half the mess for Blake. Even the Cafe Soceity interview bit was uploaded in youtube days before Baldoni hired the PR team. At some point, you all need to stop playing at this weird Amber Heard angle just because it is a PR firm that represented Depp. Blake Lively worked with plenty problematic people and sang high praises of them. Both Harvey Wienstein and Woody Allen, heck she wore custom Merchesa to her plantation wedding. So please come up with better excuse for her atrocious behavior which started this shit storm.

      • Mightymolly says:

        Thank you for this post. I am generally on team believe women, but the power dynamics here aren’t about a powerful man maligning a woman who wasn’t properly obedient. IDK what happened, and maybe they’ve both been awful to work with, but I don’t see sexism as the driving force here.

      • Sass says:

        @GEM 💯👏🏻

        I used to adore Blake, I was even willing to accept her apology after the plantation wedding. But between the way she and her husband and others treated Joe after his split with Taylor and now ALL THIS, I’m over it.

      • Ewissa says:

        Oh an you forgot her using trans phobic slurs in 2009 ant then again in 2012 never apologized for those as well.

      • Bellaluna McKenzie says:

        Absolutely agree GEM. Thank just you for putting inti words what is on my mind.

        Just because the PR firm Justin hired is the same firm that represented JD does not mean anything. It might be that it was the one firm who wasn’t afraid of defending against Blake and Ryan.

        Blake has created problems on many a sets, including Gossip Girl, for years. I don’t hate her, but I don’t particularly like her. And in this case, I majorly side-eye her. Her close friendship with Taylor Swift, the ultimate mean girl in my opinion, isn’t helping matters.

        I’ve followed Justin and his projects for a long time and I have never seen anyone comment negatively about him, his work ethics and his professionalism.

        Something smells fishy here and it’s not in Blake’s favor.

    • Byzant says:

      Except Amber was exposing dv and Blake wants us to make a girls day wearing florals to think about her fashion and haircare. While Justin expressesthr reality of dv and pairs with an excellent charity to support victims. While blake talks about wearing Brittany’s dress as her ultimate goal

  2. TN Democrat says:

    I wish TikTok would encourage people to read better books. If more people read and understood the Historical context of books like the Grapes of Wrath and To Kill a Mockingbird, out society would be better off.

    • Steph says:

      It does! Work on your algorithm to get to the part of BookTok that interests you. Then you can encourage people to ask well. It will help push those accounts into more people who wouldn’t normally see it.

    • Sass says:

      @TN Dem I can’t even begin with TikTok. I don’t have the app in my phone. But yes BookTok is obnoxious and everywhere. Stores now have BookTok sections in their entertainment departments. I gave myself a migraine rolling my eyes at the first display I saw in Target.

      Sometimes it’s fun and even healthy for us to read something easy, I love Emily Henry’s books for example. But I also love the classics, good historical fiction, literary fiction, and authors like Mark Helprin and Anthony Doerr. Janet Fitch, Shea Ernshaw, Gabrielle Zevin. These are the kinds of books I reach for. I wish more people would.

  3. ML says:

    At the premiere, Sony showed up with JB. They’re threading the needle trying to contain whatever is sucking up all the oxygen around this film. If BL’s version is the one that’s been making money, that might explain why they are “fully in sync,” however JB has had next to nothing (beyond directing future films) negative to say about BL—he’s on the record as positive as well.

    Edit: Sorry—this IS her cut. Sony is definitely not going to be a public part of whatever the cast, crew, women disliked about whatever happened.

    • Sarah says:

      Yeah Sony is playing both sides and made a development deal with Justin if I remember reading that correctly. Which tells me nothing truly terrible is going to come about about the production of this moving that will make them regret that or make them feel bad standing by Blake.

      What I think this will ultimately boil down to is bruised egos on both sides and fun Hollywood mess.

  4. Hypocrisy says:

    As a domestic violence survivor it was a trigger book to read, I was cautious about seeing the movie but whatever is happening with BL and others involved in this film is bizarre and triggering enough on its own that I won’t be watching.

    • AlpineWitch says:

      As another DV survivor I wouldn’t have watched it anyway.

      However, BL trying to erase DV as much as possible from the movie has proved to me that she’s no victim of anything here, she’s leading the rest.

      I’d bet a million dollars that her cut is the one shown in theaters.

    • Justjj says:

      I’m also a DV survivor and could never touch this book or movie with a ten foot pole. It is nothing like Amber Heard or Angelina though, to be clear. The power dynamics at play and the actual abuse receipts are just not the same…

  5. Frances says:

    This is a woman who got married on a plantation and was proud to work with Woody Allen.

    • Bonsai Mountain says:

      Exactly. Hollywood is filled with terrible white men AND terrible white women. She will be fine.

      • Isabella says:

        There are terrible people of all kinds in Hollywood.

      • Sarah says:

        Hollywood is filled with terrible Black, Brown, Asian people too. So is finance, tech, auto, hospitably , education, and whatever town you are from.

        People are people these negative actions and behaviors aren’t unique to one industry or city- Hollywood is just more interesting because they are rich and famous but it isn’t unique to them.

    • Mariko says:

      This! (Replying to Frances) So many people on here lately have glossed over this. WOC see that plantation wedding, and her Preserve blog titled “The Allure of Antebellum.” I know we should all believe women, and I usually do, but when this woman has glamorized slavery and holding up southern belles as the epitome of style and grace, I just can’t as a POC. But, I guess it doesn’t affect all the women who have glossed over that on these Blake posts the last week, probably because it doesn’t affect theme. Throw in calling Woody Allen empowering, and praising Weinstein. I just can’t with the p*ssy hat feminism that was is performative. This isn’t like Amber Heard. Tik Tok has book tok, and they organically saw the cracks before mainstream media. I follow some book tok, and this call out was directed at Baldoni until Blake minimized DV in her all her interviews, and then all of tik tok piled on Blake, many of them survivors. This was done long before he hired a crisis pr team. If you like Blake and are unbothered by her trying to make plantations and her preserve blog romantic, then racism might not affect you, just sayin’. This is the 2016 feminism spoke for white women and their stories and excluded intersectionality and drowned out voices of WOC. So many people on these posts didn’t find that to be a disqualifier for Blake. We haven’t forgotten.
      Edit to say who I was replying to

      • Giddy says:

        That plantation thing and love for the “allure of antebellum “ is so disturbing. Can she really be ignorant of the true history of that era? Or doesn’t she care because she likes playing dress-up?

    • GoldenMom says:

      I feel sorry for all the interns being forced to listen to all of her interviews, looking for her rudeness. She is NOT interesting or well-spoken in any way. That has to be the worst job in media this week!

      • therese says:

        Blake is not well-spoken at all. And consistently. Her thoughts are not well ordered; she just blabbers. A lot of people gather their thoughts first. I was completely neutral about Blake, didn’t know much if anything about her. I am growing to dislike her. I think she treats others disrespectfully. I think she is treating DB, her co-worker disrespectfully. I just don’t think she is all that, intellectually or emotionally. And frankly, people who really are all that, and advanced intellectually and emotionally and spiritually treat others kindly and respectfully.

    • February pisces says:

      Exactly! Blake had no problem with Harvey Weinstein or woody Allen. Nor does she have any problem sleeping with married men (allegedly). But the most hilarious thing of all is that Blake really does believe she’s that important. She’s not, she just made a name clinging on to more famous and important people than herself.

  6. Steph says:

    I was trying to figure out how BL could legally bring in her own team, do her own cut and screen it. That’s bc Sony bought those rights for her. That’s so messed up! Baldoni should be worried. How is he realistically going to go head to head with a studio? Everything around this seems toxic.

    • mblates says:

      i’m not sure he is? the sony execs attended the NY premiere with him and not blake, so maybe there’s some kind of conciliatory gesture there? like we know this kind of went to hell so we’ll support you in future endeavors? what’s gotten me about this whole thing has been the silence around it. i would think if it was all about creative differences with how the final cut came about, that’d be easy enough to talk about and spin for both parties? all the silence and gossip around it all makes it all seem like there’s something else going on.

    • Gem says:

      Sony isn’t beefing with Baldoni. Blake is beefing with Justin. She and that husband of hers thought it was cute to throw Baldoni under the bus to distract from the mess of PR blitz Blake created. Too bad, Justin wasn’t having it and went ballistic on them by getting his own PR team. Baldoni has on record praised Blake and entire team. He was happily off to Europe to separately promote the movie. He counted his cash and was about to check out when they tried to destroy his reputation. What was he supposed to do? Stand by and let them do it. Sony isn’t taking sides, they are keeping both sides happy. I don’t think we’ll see anymore public feuds. Everyone made their money….they’ll quietly let this die down now. That’s my guess.

  7. SarahLee says:

    Sony isn’t siding with Blake Lively. Sony is siding with Mrs. Ryan Reynolds. There is a big difference, and Blake should be mindful of that.

    • Sonia says:

      100%. Honestly, what Blake has done is pretty awful from a collaborative perspective. She commissioned her own cut of the movie and aired it behind Justin’s back months before the premiere and got her way with the studio backing it.

      And she gives no f!cks. During the premiere she literally told reporters Ryan “wrote” the rooftop scene. Not that he added a few lines or words but that he WROTE IT fullstop. Which isn’t even true. The actual screenwriter was interviewed and said she did notice a ges changes to the scene and thought maybe it was just ad lib on the day. She has no shame to throw the screen writer under the bus like that and credit her husband for a pivotal scene instead. She took over and people are wondering why Justin is pressed.

      • Mariko says:

        RR wrote the rooftop scene during the writers strike. I think there’s a lot of crew and industry people chimining in about this and calling him a scab. The screenwriter had no idea until Blake said it and the screenwriter was caught off guard when asked about Blake saying her husband rewrote it.

      • mblates says:

        this is one of the biggest things to me-it seems very unprofessional and an awful way to treat someone on your creative team. i mean what a thing to see in an interview that something you thought was changed due to an ad-lib by the actors was actually changed by someone’s spouse who wasn’t connected to the film.

      • Ula1010 says:

        I went on imdb last night and looked up the other producers on this movie. The screenwriter is also a producer. Not executive producer, associate producer, but Producer. Same title as Blake. There are other producers, as well. I wonder what they thought about Mrs. Reynolds running away with creative control. Some of them might have been fine with it, but others might not have appreciated it. This entire thing has been so odd, and her and Ryan’s boldness in almost bragging to the media with how they inserted themselves into the making of this film, is so off-putting.

    • Amy Bee says:

      That’s what I thought too when I was reading this piece.

    • LoryD75 says:

      I agree. I’ve seen more and more negative posts of Ryan online as well, going as far back as his stepping out on Alanis Morissette with Jessica Biel, and then having an affair with Blake while married to Scarlett Johansson. The internet doesn’t forget, and Sony is determined to protect their investment.

    • Jaded says:

      Came here to say exactly the same thing. Ryan has major clout and she’s using it for all it’s worth. He inserted himself into the writing and editing of this movie without Jason Baldoni’s permission even though he bought the book rights, directed and acted in it and wanted the focus to me more on the DV aspect rather than glamorizing it’s *leading lady*. Both BL and RR are sounding more and more like awful people.

    • Mel says:

      @Sarahlee-Exactly this! Sony came out to support blake because Ryan has a few things in pre-development that link to sony. The fact that blake was praised by the ceo for using the film to bring awareness to DV when she has been the one person in the cast who has tried to avoid the subject at all cost speaks volumes! They were grasping at straws on how to support her without bringing more attention to all the missteps she has made during this promotion. Its all about keeping Ryan happy so he can make them more money in the future.

      The fact she got her own version edited and played for reactions, and then tried to get people to support her version instead of the director, producer and owner of the book rights is crazy. This was only allowed to happen because of who she is married to. She thought she would have more leverage here because Justin is not as well known so she could have her way. Her next project better be one where she does have full control because after this who would want to work with her? All other producers or directors would be wary of her trying to take control.

    • Mightymolly says:

      Truth bomb right here. 👆 👆👆

  8. Sophie says:

    While I read Lainey’s take on the issue, unless you tell me that Justin Baldoni has a net worth in the hundreds of millions, I fail to see how this fight could ever be fair. Based on the article, I’m guessing that the differences in how the movie should be presented were part of the issue. I don’t necessarily disagree with Blake’s vision for the movie, since I think it aligns more with the idea behind the book, but it still seems unfair to do that to the person who originally got the movie going. Blake is a 5’10”, attractive, blonde woman who’s probably used to getting her way. Add to that the fact that she’s married to a movie star, and Justin really had no chance of winning this fight.

    • Arizona says:

      I do think it’s funny that everyone expected this to be a hard hitting drama about what DV is like. it’s really just a “this nice man saved me from a mean man, and also here’s why the man man is abusive” story.

      it’s Colleen Hoover, guys. it’s a lot closer to the flowers and girl power than it is to a serious portrayal of DV.

      • Sophie says:

        Agreed, and that flowery, softened version of DV is probably a lot more palatable to studios, since they usually prefer to steer away from such hard topics, especially those concerning women.

      • AlpineWitch says:

        I haven’t read the book but minimising DV in a film where DV is portrayed is shameful and inexcusable.

        Not to mention that she’s advertising an alcohol brand with the movie well knowing that in 50% of DV situations alcohol is involved.

        You can continue to defend Plantation Barbie as much as you like but even if Baldoni was the devil himself it wouldn’t make Lively’s behaviour less disgusting.

      • Sophie says:

        AlpineWitch, I’m not defending her; I actually don’t like her at all. I’m just saying that, having read the book, her marketing of the movie seems to fit well. The book isn’t a detailed, gruesome account of DV; it’s presented in a more watered-down version. I didn’t like the book and won’t be seeing the movie. I’m simply pointing out that Blake’s marketing of the movie aligns more with the book than Justin’s. Maybe read it, and then you can see for yourself.

      • kif says:

        I don’t find it funny and it seems a lot of people do not, too – thus, the backlash against Blake. You’re right, the book was already problematic (but a percentage of the population still patronise problematic art forms) with a problematic author. So, it isn’t surprising that the way the author will prefer her book-turned-movie be promoted is in the problematic way, too. The least they could have done was to be respectful though and not to be dismissive of DV, and that was what Blake was doing in all her interviews – not talk about DV, if the interviewer mentions it, she will reply with a very brief phrase of, ‘Lily is not a victim’ and redirect the conversation. She would not even expound on that topic and why it’s important.

        Like I posted on the previous article about Blake – she knew she did wrong in practically erasing the DV topic because after a week or so of backlash, she posted on her IG something on DV (giving a number of a hotline, etc).

        To @AlpineWitch, do not read the book. It is not worth your time & money and search on the author and her teenaged son accused of sexual assault. I do not think we should support people like her.

  9. equality says:

    It’s amusing to see people being paid millions described as “working selflessly”.

  10. ClaireLacombe says:

    “Blake’s passion and commitment to advancing the conversation around domestic violence is commendable.” I’m sorry, what? I’ve seen a couple of her interviews promoting this movie, and I don’t think I’ve ever heard her say a single word about domestic violence. It’s like ‘her’ side has been ordered not to utter those two words. Even people on the periphery of promoting this movie are getting flack in their insta comments because they keep avoiding that specific topic.

    • rayray says:

      Sony is trying to save her ass given all the criticism she is facing. This weekend is week 2 and the movie is expected to rake in millions still.

    • ML says:

      That’s one of the things I really do not understand: Why are do many people associated with a movie ostensibly about DV avoiding talking about it? I cannot believe that all of them have the limited brain capacity of an amoeba. To me, there has to be a reason behind it, and if you look in the comments here and elsewhere, survivors of DV are really understandably upset about this.

      • AlpineWitch says:

        I’m a DV survivor and wouldn’t have even known this film and the book it’s based on existed if she hadn’t gone to lengths to promote it in the wrong way and started a feud with its director.

        She’s digging her own hole here, the more she talks (or her sources talk) the more dirt comes out.

        She needs to fire her publicist or whoever is advising her.

    • tealily says:

      An interviewer even said something to her about how real life victims of DV may want to talk to her about it and asked what would be the best way to do that (kind of a weird question, but I see where he’s coming from), and her answer was some crack about how she’s not location sharing on her phone. The truth is she’s made this movie and she should probably be prepared to have those conversations, whether in an interview or with strangers who have connected with her work. She better figure it out quick!

  11. Kitten says:

    White Woman Syndrome in some of these comments….

    Blake is fine. She has not suffered any monetary damage to her career over this. This movie made $80M in the first three days. She and her husband remain a powerful, wealthy, and influential couple in Hollywood. Blake is not a victim of anything beyond her own poor decisions in how she’s handled the sensitive subject matter of this movie.

    Blake did not just face her abuser in a 6 week trial only to end up $50M in the red. Blake did not lose her future earnings and entire career because of a foreign bot farm hellbent on mischaracterizing and maligning her. So no, she is NOT getting the Amber Heard treatment and it’s infuriating to watch some people here continue to insist that she is.

    • AlpineWitch says:

      Exactly. So many people defending Plantation Barbie like she’s about to be cancelled or something – she’ll be absolutely fine.

      She’s waging this war because he bought the rights to the book and she wants him gone from all the adaptations of the following Hoover books.

      She’s also not a victim of anything as she started the pre-emptive strikes 2 months before the movie premiered. If anything she’s coming across as the attacker, not the attacked.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        “She’s waging this war because he bought the rights to the book and she wants him gone from all the adaptations of the following Hoover books.”

        THIS – she wants to force him to give her the rights to the sequel (and is likely trying to get the authors other books as well) AND she doesn’t want to pay him for it. She’s entitled enough to think he should just HAND her the rights – am sure she’s also p!ssed that Justin (and his production company) will be making more money off this than she is hence all their brand shilling thats she’s doing. She and Ryan are trying to bully their way to the rights.

        At the end of the day all 3 of them will be fine – Justin has a slate of projects that have backing lined up and the other 2 will just go on doing what they do, which is be annoying.

        Its obvs to me who started this ‘whispering’ campaign against the director and its blowing up in their face.

      • Kitten says:

        Exactly. It’s a f*cking power play and it speaks to her level of influence in Hollywood. It’s also arrogant and entitled but what it is NOT is victimhood by any stretch of the imagination. She has the advantage in this situation and she’s flexing her industry muscle to prove it by pushing him out, which is gross IMO but this is who Blake is.

    • Walking the Walk says:

      Word.

      Also, there’s tons of Black activists and influencers dropping tons of things I did not know about her on social media that had me going what the what. Also this woman is BF with freaking Taylor Swift, I don’t blame the guy for hiring someone. They are legit trying to act like he did something and not one thing is credible. Everyone agrees though she was out of pocket for doing her own freaking cut of the movie and her husband writing scenes and then Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman doing interviews of the cast of her movie. The whole thing was a hot mess. They wanted a Oppenheimer type thing and with Alien out this weekend, that is looking to take number 1, Deadpool 2, and who knows where this mess of a Lifetime movie is going to be.

  12. Hannah says:

    While I am extremely disappointed that Justin Baldoni chose the same PR crisis team as Johnny Depp (and I sincerely hope they do not employ the same insidious methods to defame BL)

    The one thing I learned from DeppvHeard is that there is no such thing as “a perfect victim”

    It does appear as if Blake Lively has a long standing documented history of behaving like an incredibly privileged & entitled mean girl who has coasted through life with her white skin, blonde hair, blue eyes and legs for far too long

    And with besties like Taylor Swift and Gigi Hadid, Ryan Reynolds as her husband and his BFF, Hugh Jackman as her wing people. She’s not ever going to have to accept responsibility or be held accountable for anything she ever does

    I hope this all blows over soon with minimal casualties

  13. Amy Bee says:

    What a mess!

  14. Lau says:

    I’m sorry but Lively hiring her own editors and making a “Lively cut” of the movie sounds incredibly disrespectful to the people who were already working on the movie. I also think that it’s very disrespectful of her to have let her husband take over some parts of the screenplay as if other people weren’t already working on it. The quotes from the scenarist might not sound like she was hurt but having your work disrupted like that is just really hurtful.

    • Emily says:

      Agree. Blake was hired to be the lead and took over the film from everyone, not just Justin. Her husband writing scenes was entirely inappropriate.

      • Lau says:

        That statement from the scenarist saying that she didn’t know that Reynolds had rewrote some scenes just rub me the wrong way. Of course she says she’s fine with it, what else is she going to say ? That this was a douchbag move from Lively and Reynolds ?

      • Flamingo says:

        @Emily she wasn’t just hired as the lead. She is listed as an Executive Producer. Ryan had no formal role. And it’s back and forth now if he actually rewrote scenes. Blake claimed it in an interview he did and the actual screenwriter. Christy Hall was like, eh NO.

        But I can imagine he tried to stick his nose in production too.

    • therese says:

      I can’t agree more with how disrespectful her actions have been: to her co-workers and to Domestic Violence and it’s victims. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. She is associating with powerful people and now thinks she is powerful. Now we know what she does with power.

    • February pisces says:

      I think Blake came on as producer after the film was shot or at some point during production. Anyway it seems like her and Ryan tried to take over the project completely. Much like Margot Robbie and her husband Tom produced Barbie together, I definitely think Blake and Ryan are trying to do something similar, by hijacking a film that wasn’t theirs to begin with and trying to make it fun and flowery.

      I also wonder if Blake ever thinks for herself or if it’s just Ryan’s controlling behaviour.

  15. Olivia says:

    Blake is a NEPO BABY and entitled. That’s the gist of it.

  16. girl_ninja says:

    All this for a mediocre book and a mediocre actress, business woman, married to a mediocre man who serves bad fashion and can’t read the room EVER. This is all too much for the likes of these people.

    • AlpineWitch says:

      I suspect this mess was created to give a push to the film but she didn’t expect any backlash or believed people at large liked her, that’s why everything has gone south.

      • Sarah says:

        I saw someone on tiktok make the point that Blake isn’t that bright or that good of a business woman but she saw what Taylor has done with her brand and Margot did with Barbie- you know harnessing girlhood and togetherness and that community and she tried to do that with this film. But since unlike Taylor and Margot her subject didn’t lend to this marketing strategy or she hadn’t built that relationship since she was 15 it is coming across tone deaf and offensive.

        Like the topic of the movie isn’t a dress up with your friends and go to the show and have fun. It is a dark topic.

    • Claire says:

      Wow I never heard that he cheated on alannis with Jessica Biel. Jessica always seems to go for narcissists for some reason. Also, wasn’t Blake (allegedly) having an affair with Ben Affleck on set of The Town while he was still married to Jennifer Garner (and then allegedly had an affair with Ryan while he was still with Scarlett)?

  17. BGB says:

    It’s fascinating reading a lot of the same people across all SM platforms who were quick to call Kelly Rowland, Serena Williams and Ayesha Curry ‘entitled’ are jumping in to defend BL.
    There’s definitely a theme…

    • Lauren says:

      Clocked it and who .

    • NikkiK says:

      A certain group of women will always be a certain group of women, lol. Quick to put themselves on a pedestal and scream about the patriarchy while actively participating in the patriarchy and harming women who don’t look like them or have their resources. Just another day that ends in day.

    • Sara says:

      💯 agree with BGB. It also annoys me with the comments saying oh there is bad in every race. Hollywood is white. Black actors/actresses don’t get the same advantage as Blake Lively. How many white actresses support Woody Allen who sexually assaulted his own daughter. None of them got cancelled but then remember how much flack Will Smith got for the slap? Or how Jonathan Majors got fired from his roles (not defending him just using him as an example) where as his white counterparts still make movies, are still acceptable by Hollywood (ie Brad Pitt, Josh Brolin, Charlie Sheen).
      So yeah Blake Lively will be just fine after this all blows over.

      • kif says:

        I wish there was an upvote button here so I could upvote your post 1000X. I was about to comment on that, too but you have already perfectly stated it. It’s similar to racists replying “all lives matter” when the topic on hand is ‘black lives matter’.

      • Sass says:

        @Sara yep! Upthread we’ve got some “all lives matter” fuckery going on

  18. Flamingo says:

    Of course, Sony is going to support her edit of the movie. Double the movies double the money. I can’t compare Blake to Hillary either. People were clowning her because. She created a false narrative of her heritage. And her Spanish accent which was totally manufactured. Her Dad enjoyed visiting Spain and took his family there on vacations. She was not raised in Spain. She is a rich Boston girl. That wanted to be exotic and co-opted a life that was not hers.

    So now I guess we are going to get It Ends with Us (Blake’s version) and then 10 more variants of it so another artist can’t get to #1 at the box office …

  19. Kittenmom says:

    Shallow comment…but WTF is that top outfit? 😳 she can’t possibly think that looks good.

  20. Anonymous says:

    Well it seems people tend to not want to side with known aholes like Blake Not So Lively and JBlow.

  21. Eurydice says:

    I really don’t understand why this has become such a thing, unless it’s because there’s nothing else to write about in August. There’s always some kind of bitching and moaning on the set, clashing egos, etc. So what? They made a successful movie – can’t they just celebrate that and hate each other in private? What’s the point of all this public show? It won’t do the movie any good. And now there’s Team This and Team That and a lot of random people angry online and trolls doing deep dives into everyone’s background. For what?

    • Nicky says:

      I have to agree. Why is this blowing up like this? There’s no story here. At least, as of now, there’s no story here. This trash movie for a trash book deserves none of this attention. Everyone seems to be doing the most to make this a big fight and I really don’t get it.

      • Ennie says:

        I’d guess that for the director, it is his job, Yes, it is ego, but he could take a hit in his livehood, unlike BL.

  22. Lee says:

    Is that DeuxMoi blog on Reynolds/Lively’s payroll? Because I listened to their latest podcast and it was ridiculously biased and pro Lively.

    • Sarah says:

      If it is that will be interesting for the Blake Taylor friendship because Taylor hates that blog for lying about her.

  23. Emily says:

    “Blake’s passion and commitment to advancing the conversation around domestic violence is commendable,”

    Ummm the hair care and look at my famous husband promo strategy says otherwise.

  24. Lisa says:

    ive never seen a real actress do this so it’s just kind of wild. has Meryl streep had her own cut? id love to see the comments if Viola Davis had her own cut.

    • Ennie says:

      THIS.
      Isn’t the director of the film the one who decides? I guess she’s a producer or her husband, but this is totally overstepping. Of course this will damage his career. Who is she again? I’ve seen her here or there maybe and has never captured my attention as an actress, she strikes me of superficiality as I remember she was known for her hard posing and beautiful dresses. If she wants to make her mark, that’s great, but I really don’t think this is the way, with her floral dresses and beefing with the director.

      • Eva says:

        I’m a DGA director and it’s hard to know how unprofessional the “Blake cut” was without knowing the details. Re-cutting a big budget feature film takes a ton of post-production resources and a lot of money. She wasn’t doing it on her own at all, there were hundreds of people involved in a re-cut. If she did this secretly, and given how much money she has and how much pull Ryan Reynolds seems to have, it’s probably do-able but I don’t think either BL or Ryan wants be seen as this kind of rebel. Millions, even billions go into films so to thwart the course of one, on your own would be a major disaster and would end any career. This is looking like, as others have said, a publicity stunt that’s grown out of control.

  25. kerfuffles says:

    If I were the director of a movie and then the star of said movie used the power and money of her movie star husband to finance the star’s “cut”/version of that movie, I as the director would be incensed. It seems clear Lively tried to wrest creative control of the movie from Baldoni. Creating and then showing her own cut to the studio must be hurtful and infuriating to Baldoni.

    And I now sense that he hired this crisis PR team not because he did something wrong and is trying to change the narrative in his favor. But rather he hired the crisis PR team to try to not get steamrolled by the Blake Lively + Ryan Reynolds juggernaut of power, money, and influence.

    It’s one thing when the director of a movie later wants their cut of the movie shown because they believes that a studio/company squashed the director’s creative vision in order to make a more commercial movie.

    But here it’s a director who his having his creative vision challenged by a very average actress with no creative bona fides but who happens to be married to one of the biggest movie stars in the world and that is currently making hundreds of millions of dollar for big corporations.

    It is gross to me. Lively has shown us who she is before with her antebellum ad copy and her plantation wedding bs. And then insulting interviewers for asking about movie and red carpet fashion – only to now claim that fashion is an integral part of movies and marketing. She just seems spoiled, clueless, and entitled.

  26. Peanut Butter says:

    I was always mystified by anyone but Blake trying to make Blake Lively happen, especially whenever she would open her mouth. She’s beautiful, yes, but so extraordinarily uncompelling, and some of the things she’s said over the years caused me to actively dislike her. I kept hoping she’d eventually fade away and go away. So now I’m mystified by the fact that she is indeed happening. There are so many interesting women in Hollywood who wield their power well. Blake isn’t one of them.

    • February pisces says:

      I agree, there’s nothing interesting or compelling about her as an actress. I think she’s more interested in being famous than actually doing any acting. I don’t think she will ever really ‘happen’ cos there’s no way Ryan will ever let her outshine him.

  27. Mahidevran says:

    I don’t think that Blake is esentially mean; but indeed too high on her own genetically blessed, American princess steeotype farts.
    She has drive and a certain ‘It’ quality that makes her oblivious of how pretty privilege made her case. She also comes from a tight-knit family that protectively opened doors for her in Hollywood.
    Maybe the film proves differently, but representing DV trauma as an experience that can be overcome one pretty dream or flowered dress at a time just shows that she’s either delusional or hardly had a brush with DV in her life.
    She doesn’t sound qualified or educated to address responsibly DV or any form of social violence towards women.

  28. Kateee says:

    So, my takeaway is Blake wanted a frothy movie that dabbled in DV but was ultimately focused on Lilly as a triumphant heroine/successful woman despite DV, whereas maybe Justin intended a film that was more serious and focused primarily on the DV aspect of the story, perhaps even his character’s history (I remember seeing in the book that the author tries to justify/explain his abusive nature)? An extremely bold move by Blake to have her own version cut… but perhaps a good read of the tea leaves that people don’t want a man telling the story of a woman’s trauma, or worse, trying to make him as much a victim of trauma as her? No idea, no interest in the story itself or either of these two egomaniacs, but the behind the scenes aspect of this is interesting to me.

    • Lola says:

      I don’t think that was Justin’s vision at all- not based on his own words in print interviews. Look through the ones that he did. To sum, he didn’t want to depict too much of the DV on screen because it would be triggering to people. He said he wanted to humanise the abuser in the film as he needed to be likeable and so it was important for audiences to understand him on a deeper level.

      So I don’t buy the argument that BL wanted to create fluff and JB wanted something hard hitting

  29. Lee says:

    Just read on various sites that she is not addressing publicly what happened between her and Baldoni. Personally I think this is proof that he did not do anything wrong, otherwise she and her hubby would have come out and publicly destroyed him.
    Curious to see how this will affect her career from now on, her ‘friendship’ with Swift and even her own marriage, because Reynolds surely did a great PR makeover to get where he is now.

  30. Lola says:

    Deux Moi mentioned yesterday that root cause of the beef was actually differences between Colleen Hoover and Justin, and Blake and the cast essentially supported Colleen.

    As has been widely reported, Colleen stopped following Justin on Instagram. Until yesterday, Justin followed Colleen. He’s still following Blake

    • Libra says:

      The truth will eventually surface and it may be this; the author was not happy (creative differences) and the cast took sides.

  31. East Villager says:

    She is not a bankable star. The Age of Adeline made 65.7M. The Shallows made 119M. So far Deadpool & Wolverine has made $851M and will probably hit $1B by Monday.
    Ryan Reynolds is rebooting the Clue franchise with Sony Pictures. This is not much of a mystery to solve.

  32. Michel says:

    She better start directing because Good luck finding another director that will work with her.

  33. Mcmmom says:

    I don’t have much to add to this discussion, except that it came up last week with my 18 year old daughter and her two best friends. My daughter *is* a fan of romance novels and has read a few Colleen Hoover books. Her friend was criticizing the PR for the film and said Blake was “tone deaf” for suggesting women wear their florals and make a girls night of it – and also for getting married on a plantation. I was happy to see that my daughter and her friends understood that DV (or racism) isn’t something to be glossed over, so I’m happy about that, at least.

  34. Freddy says:

    Julia Roberts was the biggest star in the world in the early 90s and even she couldn’t save “Sleeping With the Enemy”…I’m just confused why in this moment of human history, a major studio and a major star thought that not only should they adapt a novel about DV to the screen, but that they should market it as a rom-com. Everyone involved should vanish….

    • Ewissa says:

      Julia In her interview after SWE was asked about DV victims then she showed so much empathy and depth.Saying that she can’t answer DV questions as she never experienced it herself in any form and can’t imagine horrors of what every DV victim goes through as it goes beyond understanding of person that never lived it.They can’t empathize enough as it’s not only physical aspect but huge psychological aspect pre physical abuse and also after they fled DV as more emotional and financial abuse from perpetrators.
      I myself DV survivor experienced that people couldn’t understand how hard is to overcome DV past mentally and emotionally.

  35. Jean says:

    Blake is known to be a mean girl, that’s difficult to work with but has connections to deal with anyone who says anything negative about her. I know someone she worked with firsthand that was shocked at how rude and difficult she was with staff. Team Justin all the way!

    • Lee says:

      Don’t have any hard time believing that. She’s always come across as entitled and smug. This makes me wonder if Reynolds is the same, because usually birds of a feather flock together, but maybe he’s just better at hiding it. Curious to see if this downfall of her will affect their relationship since he’s always been very careful about his public persona and had a huge PR makeover after his divorce from Scarlett.

      • Lola says:

        I think their marriage will be fine. Reynolds knows more about his wife and whatever happened on the IEWU set than TikTok sleuths. 13 years and 4 children together doesn’t sound like a relationship built on public perception of one’s spouse.