James Patterson: Tiger Woods is like Prince Harry, not allowed to be out in the world

Before I did my research on this post, I was like “wait, wasn’t James Patterson involved with something controversial recently?” For some reason, I thought he said something positive about Donald Trump, but no, Patterson isn’t MAGA. He is pretty old and very white, which was the controversy in 2022, btw. Patterson did an interview in the Times of London where he lamented the dearth of opportunities for white men in today’s society, and said outright that the oppression of white men is “just another form of racism.” Patterson ended up apologizing but you know he still thinks that way. Anyway, Patterson has a new book – he always has a new book – and it’s a biography of Tiger Woods. While Tiger’s life story is fertile ground for would-be biographers, who wants to read Patterson’s version? Which may explain why Patterson decided to name-check Prince Harry to sell his book.

Tiger Woods is the Prince Harry of sport. So says his biographer, global sensation James Patterson, who believes the greatest golfer in history was trapped by his fame… and courted disaster when he tried to escape the gilded cage.

‘There’s a little parallel with the Royal Family,’ Patterson tells me in an interview about his new best-seller, ‘Tiger, Tiger’.

‘They’re not allowed to be real people, to be out in the world,’ he adds. ‘I think that’s probably a little bit [of the problem] with Harry. [He’s] just got to go out there and be a real person, you know?’

Tiger and Harry share another huge parallel: both men have, at times, been used to not doing things for themselves. Certainly, that’s how Woods’s former wife Elin Nordegren sees it. When fellow Swede and golf-pro Jesper Parnevik first introduced the pair in 2001, Elin was working as an au pair for Parnevik’s family. The blue-eyed 21-year-old had ambitions to train as a paediatric psychologist, was a keen amateur kickboxer and even a part-time swimsuit model. Woods, then 25, was smitten. But, instead of approaching her for a first date himself, Woods rather awkwardly sent a member of his back-up team to do the asking.

‘That’s the way he’s lived his life,’ says Patterson. ‘Whatever Woods needed, whether it was room service or a wife, his first instinct was to say: “Let’s get a manager to do that”.’

According to one of Patterson’s sources, Elin was deeply unimpressed to have been approached via proxy, describing the move as ‘weird and pathetic’. She already had a boyfriend back home in Sweden and it was months before she consented to go on a date with Woods. They tied the knot in 2004 – only for the marriage to collapse within six years in one of the messiest break-ups in sporting history, littered with sordid tales of addiction and infidelity.

[From The Daily Mail]

The Mail is running this as an exclusive. So, I have a theory! We know for a fact that the Mail asks every American they encounter about Prince Harry and Meghan. It’s basically the first thing Mail reporters do whenever they speak to any American. I suspect that was the case here, that the Mail probably encouraged or challenged Patterson to mention Harry in some way, and he was like… sure, Tiger Woods is like Prince Harry, whatever it takes to sell this book. Suffice to say, Prince Harry and Tiger Woods are nothing alike. Even Patterson’s comparison falls flat – Harry didn’t need a third party to approach women on his behalf. Harry chased Meghan himself and made it happen.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “James Patterson: Tiger Woods is like Prince Harry, not allowed to be out in the world”

  1. Tessa says:

    This comparison makes no sense.

    • Christine says:

      It does when you consider the British media have figured out that weaponizing Harry, no matter what the reason, gets clicks. Who’s clicking on an interview with an author writing about Tiger Woods in 2024? Maybe 100 people, total?

      It’s all completely nonsensical. The problem you people have with Harry is he rejects the idea that he is shackled to a gilded cage for life. The man has literally made you all weep, vomit, and spin yarns about how serial killers aren’t as awful as his wife, and you think he needs a babysitter?

      Cry harder.

  2. Nic919 says:

    Patterson named the wrong brother. William is the one who doesn’t do things himself and gets others to screen things for him. William had his friends “vet” Kate before she was allowed in his circle and the Middletons catered to him including setting up that Boxing Day hunt and church walk when he didn’t want to go to Sandringham. William has never been self sufficient in his life with staff around him or lackey friends to do what he wants. His issue with Harry is that Harry pushed back and is the only one ever to do so.

    And the cheating is similar too except that Kate stays quiet for status and access to money. Elin had some self esteem and decided she wasn’t going to put up with it anymore.

  3. girl_ninja says:

    We are never gonna get rid of the stupid nonsensical views of these privileged old white men are we?

  4. Eurydice says:

    I suppose one could say that both Harry and Tiger lived a life with gatekeepers, but in Tiger’s case that could also be said of other “managed” child prodigies and stars. He started playing golf at 18 months, was playing golf on TV at 3 years and was known to the golfing community by age 5. Starting with his father, someone was always managing Tiger’s life and career. He really did change the face of golf and it’s a shame that he wasn’t able to mature as a person as quickly as he did as a golfer

    • Becks1 says:

      yeah, I can kind of see the comparison, not with 2024 Harry, but with maybe 2014 Harry, and certainly with William to this day. And not just with Tiger but with any super managed child star/adult star, whose image is carefully crafted and who is worth a lot of money to the people around them, so those people control and manage them.

      For the royals, its both the courtiers who control and manage them (because they are so devoted to the monarchy? For the power? because their livelihoods are dependent on the monarchy?) as well as the press/media.

      harry broke free, first with the military and then with Meghan, but as we all know it wasn’t easy and there were a LOT of people who wanted (still want) to keep him in that royal cage.

      • Eurydice says:

        I think courtiers must really believe in the institution, but also that the institution can’t run without them. And, probably, it can’t. There’s a certain power in knowing that these beings anointed by god can’t tie their own shoes. I’m kind of reminded of Italy, which has had 69 governments since the end of WWII, but has a layer of bureaucrats that rarely change beneath the government to keep things going.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    This is lame and it just goes to show how obsessed the British press is with Harry. It’s kind of scary.

  6. MsIam says:

    Yeah, Patterson should be wearing a sling around his arm after that reach, lol. I think honestly, underneath it all Tiger Woods is just an awful, entitled person. And his comments about black women are gross. So no, just no.

  7. Zinnia says:

    Men this old that completely dye their hair look silly. Leave some gray and it won’t look so bad.

  8. GoodWitchGlenda says:

    Yes I don’t think he pulled that comparison out of nowhere. I’m sure he was asked about Harry and shoe horned the subject of his book in.

    I’m not going to read (no pun intended) too much into it.

  9. Kelly says:

    Patterson is trash. I remember the interview where he sat with Bill Clinton over the book they wrote together, and didn’t blink an eye as Clinton expressed outrage over whether Monica Lewinsky was owed an apology by him. ML certainly was responsible for her own actions (sex with married men, any married men, is a big no), but FFS, Clinton was not only older, but the one married, essentially her employer, and, oh yeah, President of the US. He bounced back where she became the victim of the talk show hosts and stand up comedians everywhere and contemplated suicide as Clinton writes his auto-bio. Men of a certain ilk stick together.

  10. Michael Harris says:

    Tiger and Harry are very different. Although both had access to a United Nations of women their choices were very different. Tiger feasted only on European cuisine despite his mom’s Thai heritage. Harry delighted in the English and British Roses of his environs yet ventured out openly and honestly unlike the other royals who indulged in ebony pleasures in secret. From an early age Prince Harry has shown an affinity for and attraction to pretty little black girls, teens, and ebony women in general. Remember the famous photo of him staring admiringly at the cute black girl child
    while touring; his verbal praise of Halle Berry and her poster on his wall at Eton; his glowing remarks about Rihanna, Serena and other noted black women; his love of Africa includes its women in addition to its natural beauty in my opinion. Harry is open to love in its myriad colors.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment