Jacob Elordi & Margot Robbie cast as Heathcliff & Cathy in ‘Wuthering Heights’

True story: I haven’t read Wuthering Heights since high school. It never captured my imagination like Jane Eyre, which I’ve reread several times in adulthood (and I still love). I acknowledge that Heathcliff and Cathy are iconic and that many people have strong feelings about any and all adaptations of the material. It feels like Jane Eyre is the easier book to adapt, and as such, there have been so many film and TV adaptations. Well, Emerald Fennell is going to change that. She’s adapting Wuthering Heights for the screen after the surprise (?) success of Saltburn. Fennell’s films have been consistently produced by Margot Robbie’s Lucky Chap, and I guess Emerald wants Wuthering Heights to be Margot’s postpartum comeback role. And Emerald wants Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff? Oh no.

In what is gearing up to be an A-list pairing for Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights movie, MRC is tapping Oscar-nominated actress and producer Margot Robbie and BAFTA-nominated actor Jacob Elordi to star in the adaptation of the classic novel.

LuckyChap also will produce Fennell’s upcoming feature film adaptation based on the iconic romance novel by Emily Brontë. Besides being the studio on the project, MRC also will finance the pic.

This marks LuckyChap and Fennell’s third collaboration together, having also produced her most recent pic Saltburn and Promising Young Woman, which won Fennell an Oscar for original screenplay.

Robbie is set to star as Catherine Earnshaw, and Elordi will play Heathcliff. Fennell is set to write, direct and produce. The film is in pre-production gearing up for a UK shoot in 2025.

[From Deadline]

Because I don’t have super-strong feelings about the material, I don’t really care that Emerald is going to put her stink on a classic novel. But even an ambivalent B like me is side-eyeing these casting choices. Elordi as Heathcliff? REALLY? Margot might do an okay job as the grown-up Cathy, but it feels like Fennell is being super-chaotic. I bet the script will be painful too.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

92 Responses to “Jacob Elordi & Margot Robbie cast as Heathcliff & Cathy in ‘Wuthering Heights’”

  1. Whatever says:

    I don’t see any reason not to give Emerald Fennell the benefit of the doubt until we actually see this. She knows very well what both of those actors are capable of, and Saltburn and Promising Young Woman were both amazing.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      I like both of those movies but I must admit I have issues with this casting, especially the casting of Jacob Elordi because Heathcliff is clearly not white in the book!! I re-read it earlier this year and it repeatedly stated how dark Heathcliff is and that is just one of the reasons why he is othered and abused in the family that takes him in. In short, Heathcliff should be played by a man of colour. So this casting makes me think that maybe Fennell is not as familiar with the novel as she ought to be if she is to adapt it.

      • Agree completely, Arthistorian – Heathcliff is not white. Also, dear whoever wrote the article in Deadline, it’s not a romance novel.

      • Leigh says:

        Totally agree. Jacob Anderson ( from Interview With The Vampire) would be my choice to play Heathcliff.

      • Megan says:

        Heathcliff is described as a Gypsy and Lascar in the novel, both of which referred to people from India at the time.

      • Sunny says:

        The classic clearly states he is gypsy – like in appearance so my wish would have been more Latina, etc….. if anything.

      • Edie says:

        I really loved Wuthering Heights as a kid. I actually like Margot for the role, but I’d cast Dev Patel as Heathcliff. I think he could pull off the anger/pain of the role.

      • GoodWitchGlenda says:

        Yeah, this very much. His being not-white is like….kinda the whole thing. An Indian actor would have been a better choice IMO

    • Megan says:

      This is a film adaptation no one is asking for and Saltburn was laughably bad.

      • lisa says:

        agree, no one asked for this. and agree with above that Heathcliff is probably biracial or not white and a current production should be acknowledging that.

      • Square2 says:

        Emerald Fennell said Saltburn was her take on “Brideshead Revisited” mixed with “The Talented Mr. Ripley”, and her people & UK peeps/critics praised it to the nine. In reality, it’s just a OK movie that failed to live up its hype. It was such a let down after I saw it. It did not compare to “Brideshead Revisited” (both TV series versions) & “The Talented Mr. Ripley” in artistic & scripts. A movie with quite a bit of s3xual contents did not automatically make a film a good film. So now I reserve my expectation on Emerald Fennell’s projects, and I think the casting of the Elordi & Robbie is not ideal.

      • MaisiesMom says:

        I didn’t find Saltburn laughably bad, but neither did I think it was great enough to deserve the accolades it received. Barry Keoghan is very talented, Rosamund Pike can deliver satire and Jacob Elordi looked handsome. Visually it was gorgeous and it was provocative, but overall I don’t find Fennell all that impressive as a director. She’s overrated. The movie was kind of all over the place.

      • Mil says:

        I get no one asked for it. The up side- some people will read the book when the movie comes out. That’s why I am not hating on all cover songs and endless streams of remakes.
        Is it wrong that i never heard of Jacob before this article?

      • NotClaudi says:

        I liked Saltburn and thought Jacob Elordi did a good job as Felix, but he is not the right choice for Heathcliff, can’t imagine him in that role at all.
        I also don’t like Margot Robbie for Cathy…

  2. Pink tutu says:

    Gosh. Its hard looking back on them now. I liked wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre. I also preferred JE. But my fav of that classical genre was P & P which I read yearly since aged 10 to 25 then every few years after. I’m happy to see a re-imagining. I hated the movie of P and P, with Knightly. it was lazy and crappy and didn’t reflect the book at all. It seemed the people who loved it hadn’t read the book. that the director never really read the book or saw other productions was very obvious. Suspicious of new productions of books I love but I guess we’ll see.

    • Beana says:

      Also a diehard P&P fan, and I completely agree with you on the Knightley version! Some of the adapted lines would have had JA spinning in her grave. What are your thoughts on the Colin Firth series?

    • Becks1 says:

      Someone on here a few months ago said that the P&P version with Knightley was a good movie but not a good adaptation of P&P and not a good AUSTEN movie and I thought that hit the nail on the head.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        That is so true. It is a visually beautiful movie and an effective romance – but it lack the satire that would have made it Austen.
        And Kiera Knightley was just so wrong for that role.

      • Nick G says:

        Yeah the trouble was that the Kiera Knightly version was a Bronte version of an Austen novel- completely different in tone and meaning.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        Yep. Kiera lacked that sweetness that Elizabeth Bennett has that offsets her piercing wit and archness. Jennifer Ehle had that quality is spades and that is what makes her character so charming despite her tendency to cleverly put down people to their face. That is why Ehle will always be the quintessential Elizabeth Bennett, just like Colin Firth is also the quintessential Mr. Darcy.

      • Nic919 says:

        Exactly so. I co sign the Brontë version of an Austen novel comment. Darcy walking in the misty moors with his shirt half open at the end was the opposite of what happens in any Austen novel. The Brontes said she was stuffy exactly because she wasn’t making her heroes do this.

    • Eurydice says:

      I have so erased that version from my mind that, for a second, I thought you were saying Mr. Knightly was in P&P. Every woman in my family, from grandmother, mother, cousins and nieces, feels that Colin Firth is the superior Darcy.

      • Becks1 says:

        Its kind of like how I erase the Dakota Johnson Persuasion from my head – although Mia McKenna-Bruce was amazing as Mary lol.

      • Pink tutu says:

        Sorry I can’t spell her name. But that version of P & P was horrifying. The director said he hadn’t read the book. And I find the actor who played Darcy not just a bad actor but utterly unconvincing as Darcy. The mini series really captured the book I thought.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        Matthew Macfayden who plays Darcy in the movie is actually a wonderful actor, he was just wrong for the part. He is a brilliant comedic actor.

    • manda says:

      Have you ever seen Death comes to Pemberly? It’s an adaptation of a PD James novel, and has Matthew Rhys as Darcy and Anna Maxwell Martin as Lizzy and I just think they did so well with that casting, IMO. He’s my favorite Darcy. (I personally love the random stories inspired by P&P and Austen books, like there is a series of mysteries where the Darcy’s son and the daughter of the couple from Northanger Abbey solve mysteries and I LOVE them)

      • lisa says:

        ooh what is the name of the series you are referring to? im always up for a new mystery

      • manda says:

        @ Lisa–the first is called the Murder of Mr. Wickham, by Claudia Gray. The series is called Mr. Darcy and Miss Tilney mysteries. There are three so far!

    • mightymolly says:

      I’ve never found a Jane Austen adaptation I liked. Austen didn’t write romance novels, but all the adaptations are basically romcoms, not searing indictments of a useless aristocracy and the suffocating restrictions of women’s lives.

  3. Agnes says:

    Jacob has the “gypsy brat” bone structure and coloring. I mean, if Timothy Dalton can do it, so can he. Just glower and snarl. Margot Robbie is beautiful but not young enough to play Cathy, who is only 18 when she dies in childbirth.

    • Mimi says:

      Elordi doesn nothing for me. His features look scrunched together in the middle of his face.

    • Eurydice says:

      Lol, on the glower and snarl. When my brother was going through his mercifully short adolescent angst, my father used to greet him with “What’s up, Heathcliff?”

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Heathcliff is described as dark as a lascar, he is not white. Elordi is soo wrong for this part. Not to mention that I doubt he can pull this role off acting wise.

  4. Chaine says:

    This casting makes no sense if the script stays true to the book, where Cathy is at most in her late teens while Heathcliff is nearly forty. I love Margot Robbie but there is no way she carries off being a teen.

    • Kittenmom says:

      Thank you! Absolutely crazy casting choices considering the ages of the characters in the book.

    • mightymolly says:

      That’s the part that bothers me most. Heathcliff’s ethnicity is ambiguous and could be interpreted many ways, but Catherine is a naive teenager. I feel like it’s gonna be a huge suspension of belief with Robbie, not because we don’t regularly see 30 somethings playing teens, but not a teen like Cathy who barely knows the world beyond her front door.

  5. KeKe Swan says:

    I can’t remember how old Cathy is when Heathcliff returns from his travels to find her… married to his rival? I do remember there were two Cathys… god it’s been years. Can’t remember a thing!

  6. Digital Unicorn says:

    I loved Jane Eyre – I have very strong feelings about the toxic characters and plot lines of Wuthering Heights esp how some fans glorify the obvious domestic violence and MH as ‘a a fiery passionate love for the ages story’ (I had a friend who described the book that way when I mentioned the DV). I look at the book as a peek behind the curtain of those times where forced/arranged marriages, DV and MH issues were hidden away, esp as some literary historians have suggested that Emily herself suffered from MH issues (I think there are letters from her sister alluding to them).

    I don’t get the obsession with that book in particular.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      It is part of the Romantic movement in the arts with its use of extremely heightened emotions – and that does not necessarily mean that it is romantic in the way we usually use the term. This book is bonkers in so many ways, Heathcliff and Cathy are utterly unhinged in a unrealistic way that is just peak Romanticism.

      I also enjoy the intricate narrative structure – as well as the exploration of the generational cycle of abuse that is first perpetrated upon Heathcliff and he then perpetuates upon Hareton. This story is just an incredibly intense tragedy on so many levels.

      I think there are many reasons why people confuse this masterful novel with an ordinary romance – and I think the many film adaptations have had a big influence here.

      • Eurydice says:

        I always saw this as an anti-romance – actually, anti on so many levels.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        I completely agree that the book in bonkers in the sense of how intensely emotional the main characters are, esp when you compare it to other books/characters from the same era (Jane Austin etc..) who were very uptight and closed off.

        I didn’t mean to imply that I thought the book was bad, its not – its a very well written book with many intricate threads woven throughout. Not many writers can pull that off.

        I also agree that many movie/TV adaptations focus on the Cathy/Heathcliff romance, missing out the wider narrative that its actually about 2 very messed up people who knowingly destroy the lives of those around them.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        I do think that Brönte’s novel is in part in rebellion against Austen’s novels. Romanticism was very defined against the neo-classicism of the Regency/Empire era, not just in terms of the heightened emotionality but also the role ascribed to nature. It is a rebellion against everything that is ordered, balanced and regulated.

        And I do think of it as an anti-romance in a sense, because this book is just so incredibly dark. It is really something I noted when I re-read it as an adult. All the child abuse and domestic violence is very disturbing and I honestly find both Heathcliff and Cathy super annoying in all their histronic behaviour.

        Interestingly, Austen criticizes the Romantics through the character of Marianne in Sense & Sensibility, just like she criticizes the Gothic literature in Northanger Abbey. I love those meta-textual aspects of those novels.

      • Leigh says:

        Love your comment. I read Wuthering Heights for the first time in high-school, and every time I re-read it, I find something new to analyze. I

      • Becks1 says:

        okay you all are starting to convince me that maybe I should give Wuthering Heights another shot. I read it in HS and then read it again maybe…..15 years ago? When I went through a “I should learn to like the Brontes” phase and wasnt a fan. but maybe I should try again with some of this in my head.

        Can I just say that I LOVE that we can have multiple posts about royal gossip, movie gossip, celeb gossip, political news, but I feel you can always count on CBers to want to chime in on anything Bronte or Austen related (I think so far this post has the most comments today lol.)

      • bisynaptic says:

        It’s gothic horror.

      • Nic919 says:

        I agree that WH is an anti romance and that’s why most adaptations get it so wrong. Emerald Fennel tends to go for an arch tone in her movies and while Margot Robbie could get it right, I think she miscast Heathcliff.

        Jane Eyre is more of a conventional romance although it wasn’t at the time and I think that’s why many group WH in there. Anne Bronte is closer to JE in tone with Tenant of Wildfell Hall but WH remains kind of unique because I wonder if it was written by a male it would be classified a bit different (once the Bell identities were known. ).

      • ArtHistorian says:

        @Beck1,

        I disliked WH when I first read it because the main characters are so obnoxious. Re-reading it when I was older really changed my opinion of it. Heathcliff and Cathy are still obnoxious but it is also kinda funny how unhinged they are. They become a bit of a caricature. What I found that I really liked was the structure of the narrative and the uncompromising way the novel explores the issues of generational abuse. While it adheres to the Gothic genre of the Romantic age, it is much more realistic in its darkness. It is an incredibly bold and powerful novel, especially in its historical context.

        And I do wonder if its essence can be captured in an adaptation. It hasn’t yet IMO.

    • Wilma says:

      Wuthering Heights is my favorite of the two. Jane Eyre always seems contrived to me because the characters are written like they know better and are more rational, but then they do all these dumb things. Heathcliff and Cathy are full of teenage angst and both are these hypersensitive goths. I never expected them to have a normal and healthy relationship.

      • kirk says:

        Apt description – “hypersensitive goths.”
        I spent one summer babysitting my sister’s kids and relaxing at the cheap on-campus movie theatre that screened old B&W classics. Laurence Olivier!

  7. Becks1 says:

    I’m not really a Bronte fan (I hate Jane Eyre and always have, I’ve tried so many times to like it and I just can’t.) But I also think Jane Eyre is more…..open in its darkness, I guess. I think a lot of people consider Wuthering Heights to be this great love story and I found it very dark.

    So I think if Fennell plays up the dark side of it, she could do a really good job.

    That said….I just cannot see Margot Robbie in this role. At all. Maybe she’s looking for something dark to remove the last vestiges of Barbie, but I think she’s too old unfortunately. And Jacob elordi – maybe? but not against Margot.

  8. SarahLee says:

    Margot Robbie is WAY too old for this role! Goodness.

  9. girl_ninja says:

    Why Jacob when Dev Patel is right there, brilliant, talented and hot as the sun. And possibly Kiernan Shipka as Cathy. I don’t know but this casting is not it.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Exactly! Dev Patel would be perfect!

    • sevenblue says:

      I just watched his last movie, Monkey Man. That man is truly very beautiful. He needs to do some romcoms.

    • Jensa says:

      Dev Patel would be an excellent choice.
      I quite liked Charlotte Riley as Catherine in the TV series from about 15 years ago (but wasn’t really a fan of the series itself).

    • Get Real says:

      LOVE the Dev Patel fancasting. He’d be perfect.
      I prefer Daisy Edgar Jones as Cathy, but will suspend disbelief about MR and see what Emerald Fennel comes up with. I think she has flashes of brilliance.
      That said, I adored Keira Knightly in PP and have read the book many times. I’m not a purist, I guess. Didn’t love the Colin Firth series. Too dry, albeit faithful.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        I feel the opposite. I dislike the movie and love the show, it is so funny. Maybe not as “romantic” in our modern sense of the notion but it is hilarious and I love Austen for her biting wit. She was like that in real life, her relatives feared her sharp tongue. 😉

    • Jais says:

      Oh wow. Dev as Heathcliff? Yes, sign me up plz.

    • SarahLee says:

      I like that casting!

    • Edie says:

      I answered a comment above with Patel. I can see him with Shipka hitting all the painful, angsty tones of the book.

  10. Diana says:

    I will wait until I see it but it doesn’t excite me.

    What I will say is that Wuthering Heights is not a romance. It’s about all kinds of abuse and generational trauma.

    I hate when we get crappy adaptations of my favourite books. It means having to wait longer for the next adaptation that might be good. The recent Rebecca for instance was AWFUL and now I have to wait another10 years for the next one.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      OMG, the most recent Rebecca is soo bad. And totally miscast as well – Armie Hammer and Lily James. Really?

    • MaisiesMom says:

      The recent “Rebecca” wasn’t even Rebecca! They turned a Gothic-light thriller into a sort of romantic adventure. The ending was stupid.

  11. Jensa says:

    It’s always been somewhat over-romanticised (the novel) as a classic love story, whereas in reality it’s a bit of an overwrought affair about obsession, cruelty, etc. with alcoholism, domestic violence, class issues and mental illness thrown into the mix. So an interpretation which explores that darker side through a modern lens could be interesting.
    But I don’t think the casting is right. Cathy was supposed to be still a teenager when she died, and the description of Heathcliff strongly hints at Indian / maybe Roma heritage.

  12. Sue says:

    Ugh. Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre have been remade soooo many times. Leave the Brontë classics alone, thanks.
    But the best WH was the Tom Hardy as Heathcliff version and I’ll leave it at that.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      I would actually like an adaptation that would really commit to explore the darkness that is at the heart of the novel – the abuse and obsession that is deeply tied up in class issues and race as well. However, I do not think this adaptation will be it.

    • bears says:

      Came here to say this. Tom Hardy will always be my favorite Heathcliff.

  13. manda says:

    NY Mag had a thing about the casting, and someone said that Jacob Elordi does “vacant” very well, which is not what Heathcliff is, and I thought that was so funny. I haven’t see anything with Elordi except for that ep of SNL he hosted and the Priscilla movie, and I can see him being about to do vacant well

  14. Sass says:

    My father gave me a copy of WH as a gift when I was 15 with the inscription that he had loved it at that age as well. As I’ve gotten older I have returned to it and with age comes maturity and better understanding of context (as well as a minor in literature). At first glance, WH seems like a tragic love story, with the obvious narrative on class and race woven in. But it is actually a horror story, with all the gothic elements associated. I would go so far as to call it a ghost story.

    I’m not excited about the casting, but I’m interested to see what Fennell does with the material. She’s into dark stuff and I appreciate that she likely sees this as a gothic horror. Still, screen adaptations of this novel have notoriously not done well.

  15. Elsa says:

    I think Margot will be great. Young women are in everything. A mature Cathy will be good. Plus Margot can play young I think.

  16. Izzy says:

    Heathcliff is most definitely not white in the book, and that is a central part of the backstory of his character. This whitewash casting is ridiculous.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Exactly. As far as I know there is only one movie that has acknowledged that Heathcliff is a man of colour and cast the part according to that. It is the one from 2011 (can’t remember the director but it is a woman).

      • likethedirection says:

        Andrea Arnold! Though I’ll admit I couldn’t finish her version, and I usually love her work

  17. chill says:

    Wuthering Heights is painful! Two emotionally immature and mentally unstable people ruin the lives of others around them. There is not a lot of love. It’s a painful story.

  18. Megan says:

    I’m excited to see what emerald fennel does with the gothicness of Wuthering Heights. I feel like she’ll be able to work with the darkness of the book better than others who have adapted it. Heathcliff and Cathy are such dark chapters. I’m less sure about Jacob Elordi: I can’t really see him murdering kittens or digging up a corpse. Barry Keoghan seems like he’d have been a better choice. (I love Dev Patel so much, but I can’t see him wanting this role.)

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Riz Ahmed would be perfect as Heathcliff thou might be a bit too old however he is producing a movie where he is playing Hamlet so he could pull it off.

      With Riz as Heathcliff you would def get to see the much darker side of the character.

      • Megan says:

        Riz Ahmed would be amazing. He should be in everything.

        Did anyone read What Souls are Made of by Tasha Suri? It’s a really fun retelling of WH that contends with Heathcliff’s identity more fully.

    • Get Real says:

      When did Heathcliff murder kittens?! Did I miss something?

      • Megan says:

        Omg. I totally misspoke. It was Hareton and it was puppies, not kittens. (I’m a deeply embarrassed English major, haha.) It’s such a dark book. They’re almost all such dreadful people.

      • Jensa says:

        He did kill his wife’s dog though. He hangs it in front of her, on the night they elope, while she pleads for its life, and then gloats about his cruelty.

  19. Ben says:

    Jacob is tall and handsome but doesn’t have acting range like Barry Keoghan or Josh O Connor whom can become sexy and truly seductive machines on command. Forever obsessed with Josh since God’s Own Country 🔥🔥🔥 Barry and Josh seemed really smart and insightful during interviews. Jacob is lacking in that department too.

  20. Libra says:

    Heathcliff is Mr Earnshaws illegitimate son, thus he is mixed race. Cathy refers to him as “not a regular black”. Neither one of these people are appropriate imo.

  21. AnnaSP says:

    You mean ‘indifferent’, not ‘ambivalent.’

  22. MaisiesMom says:

    I admit I have never read the book. “Jane Eyre” is among my favorites and I have read it a dozen times. I know the characters and basic plot of WH, but not the details. I didn’t realize Heathcliff was mixed race.

    This seems like weird casting. Margot Robbie is a great actress and she can transform herself, like she did in the Tonya Harding movie, But this is a stretch. Jacob is OK but seems limited. She’s cast him before, so maybe she just likes working with certain actors on repeat? Carey Mulligan was in “Saltburn” in a small and rather unnecessary role after starring in “PYW.”

    I don’t love Fennell’s work. It’s so stylized that it seems a little self-indulgent and gimmicky to me, but maybe I am missing something. I’ll be curious to see where this goes and how people react to it.

  23. Keekey says:

    The Ralph Fiennes/Juliet Binoche version of Wuthering Heights will never be topped, IMO.

    • Flamingo says:

      100% agree I love that version and there is a cameo by Sinéad O’Connor (RIP).

      It made me read the book and just love how over the top it was. Oh, teenage me thought this was true love lol.

      “I pray one prayer; I repeat it till my tongue stiffens. Catherine Earnshaw, may you not rest as long as I am living! You said I killed you, haunt me, then!… Be with me always, take any form, drive me mad, only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you!… I cannot live without my life. I cannot live without my soul”

  24. Leah says:

    I think Emerald Fennell is a director/writer/producer to watch and I look forward to her take on Wuthering Heights. I loved Saltburn and Promising Young Woman.

  25. BGB says:

    The continued whitewashing of Heathcliff, a LITERAL plot point of the book, is so very predictable.

  26. Mirelle says:

    Meh. Don’t know who Elordi is and I think Robbie is a decent actress, nothing special. I’ve seen every version of WH and not liked any of them. And it is a problematic story in many ways — not a romantic one. I can’t stand Jane Eyre either. I hate the way Bertha Rochester was portrayed. A mixed raced woman who is insane, jealous, violent, troublesome because she’s not English and not entirely white. Races are not supposed to mix or you’ll get insanity! F*ck all the way off. So she gets locked up because she’s an animal and Roderick goes after (and marries) the sensible white, quiet, intelligent Jane. All is right in the world again! Sorry, but nope, nope, nope. As a child, I hated how Bertha was written and how her background was portrayed. I don’t like the Brontes and, outside of Elinor Dashwood, I can’t tolerate any of Austen’s heroines either.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment