Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie deny split rumors

Premiere of Warner Bros. Pictures' & Spyglass Entertainment's "Invictus"
Over the weekend we heard the maybe-shocking news that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s split was imminent. Notorious British tabloid News of the World claimed that the couple contacted a divorce attorney in Beverly Hills in early December to hash out the legal details of their breakup and that “An announcement of their separation is expected to be made soon.” Brad and Angelina are not married but they do have six children together and a massive fortune including multiple real estate holdings.

As Kaiser reported, News of The World pays good money for stories, but they’re definitely not known for their integrity and it’s possible the story was made up. People Magazine quotes “sources” who claim that Brad and Angelina are fine and that both are now based in LA working on their upcoming films. They were apart recently when Angelina went to NY to do a Vanity Fair photoshoot. One very interesting tidbit in People’s story is that pre-production has started on Brad’s film The Lost City of Z, in which Pitt plays a British explorer at the turn of the 20th century looking for a lost city in Brazil. The explorer, Col. Percy Harrison Fawcett, sported a long goatee just like the one Brad Pitt is wearing. As of earlier this month, there was still no script for Lost City, but now that the movie is in pre-production, Pitt has the perfect excuse for his unkempt facial hair.

While reports are swirling that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are headed for a split, multiple sources close to the family tell PEOPLE that the rumors are false.

“Everything is fine” with the couple, who are parents to six kids, a source says.

Another source says the split reports, which were first published in a British tabloid, are “totally false.”

In recent weeks, it’s been business as usual for the busy couple – movie shoots, family outings, charity work – and several observers say they saw nothing amiss.

On Jan. 2, Pitt, 46, and Jolie, 34, shared a romantic dinner for two at the French restaurant Le Perigord. “You could tell they wanted to spend time alone and didn’t want to be bothered by anybody else,” says a source. “It was wonderful to see a couple so much in love.”

With filming wrapped, the two headed back to Los Angeles to work on pre-production for their upcoming movies: Jolie’s The Tourist and Pitt’s Lost City of Z. On Jan. 16, Pitt took their eldest son, Maddox, on a boys’ trip to the New Orleans Saints’ playoff game, while Jolie was spotted grocery shopping and dropping by an Apple Store in L.A. with daughters Zahara and Shiloh.

In the last few days, Jolie reportedly jetted to New York City for a Vanity Fair photo shoot, while Pitt stayed in L.A. to participate in friend George Clooney’s Hope for Haiti Now telethon. (Both Pitt and Jolie made major donations to the relief effort.) Pitt didn’t attend Saturday’s Screen Actors Guild Awards, where his Inglourious Basterds picked up the award for best ensemble cast.

[From People]

I think these two have problems like everyone else. They have six kids, they’re both juggling a bunch of career obligations and even with all that money and help it can’t be easy. I wouldn’t be surprised if they split up because they have a 50/50 chance like just about every other married/committed couple. If it was easy a higher percentage of people would stay married/together. Maybe it was smart of them not to make it official and more complicated than it needed to be.

Still, we don’t have a window onto their home life and have no idea what’s it’s like. There’s a whole industry built up around trying to squeeze out the details of the lives of the rich and famous. When there’s not much information there, the tabloids make it up. As the most famous couple of all, Brad and Angelina are subjected to the most false reports. This one had a whiff of truth to it to many people, probably because these two don’t take pains to deny tabloid stories unless they’ve reached a fever pitch.

MOCA NEW 30th Anniversary Gala - Cocktails

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

58 Responses to “Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie deny split rumors”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. YT says:

    Since New of the World was the source of the break-up story, it is difficult to believe. As far as seeing a lawyer about legal details for a separation, I suspect those details were covered in legal documents when they first got together and that they are updated as time goes on.

  2. Ann says:

    People Mag is so far up Angelina’s ass that they wouldn’t announce their split even if the two of them would say it in public.

  3. Black Cat says:

    bah.. it’s ovah !!

  4. bite me says:

    my sources have told me, that is really is overrr, and that Brand and Jen will remarry on Ocotber 2… However Brand will no longer be part of the children lifes.. AJ told him that is he tried to fight for custody she would kill him

  5. Maleficent says:

    Well denials don’t always mean things aren’t true:

    1. Edwards: I am not the father.

    2.Clinton: I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

    3.Nixon: I am not a crook.

    4. Aniston and Pitt: Everythings just fine.

    5. Lindsay Lohan: She is not on drugs.

    6.O.J Simpson: I did not kill my wife.

    I could go on, but you get my point.

  6. lucy2 says:

    We’ll see. Different break up rumors every week with these two.
    Have to agree about People mag.

  7. Ursula says:

    NOTW has not integrity but they also broke Madonna’s divorce and she vehemently denied it and even threatened to sue. Besides, their story is not a stretch. Many points to consider:

    – How quickly ti spread like a wild fire to mainstream media makes me believe that other outlets also had an inkling of what is to come.

    – Brangelina’s reps are mum. Why anonymous sources to their chum people magazine?

    Whatever the situation, Brange are on the final leg of their journey. It is not easy to put on a show and for the last year, they have failed miserably, one would be forgiven if they doubted that they were even actors.

  8. Tess says:

    Is Brad wearing lifts in the above picture????????

    Oh…Wait….Back to subject at hand….I think that the reality of their lives is that it’s actually simpler to separate than to try to merge their very complicated lives.

  9. Anastasia says:

    First, I got very excited when I read about the Lost City of Z! I just read that book last summer! So yay, a movie I can get a bit excited over, rather than the usual dreck.

    Secondly, some of you talk like you actually live with these people. You don’t. Like CB said (in that very well-written article, by the way), they have the same chances as any other couple.

    I think it’s really creepy how often tabloids and regular people are hoping and wishing for misery for these people and their kids. It’s really weird.

    Heck, if anyone in the whole world has reason to be sticking rusty pins in voodoo dolls, it’s Jennifer Aniston and I seriously doubt she wishes misery on them as some people here do.

    As with any couple, I do not believe any rumors of splits until the couple themselves (or through their reps) confirm it. So for those of you wanting to party down at the news of a family imploding, you’ll have to wait, it seems.

  10. westender says:

    If Brad and Angelina separate and Jennifer and Brad do not reunite.What on earth will the tabloids write about?

  11. Bodhi says:

    Yeah, well the rumor that Johnny Depp died spread like wildfire too

  12. Praise St. Angie! says:

    I’ll start by saying that I don’t necessarily believe this, and I won’t until I hear it from the horses’ mouths. I also hope that it’s not true, for the sake of the kids.

    however, Maleficent (great name, BTW) makes a point. I also find it interesting that THIS break-up rumor has been denied, seemingly so vehemently, while so many other before it were met with no comment of any sort from their “rep”, or a “source close to the family”.

    Does it mean anything? maybe yes, maybe no. we just have to wait on this one.

  13. Birdie says:

    This couple is damned if they deny, and damned if they don’t.

    The only difference between this story and the ones that run weekly is continental. Are the break-up stories somehow more plausible because a British tabloid wrote them? Maybe it’s because at the very least the Brits try to keep it realistic – dividing assets and sharing kids, while the American gossip rags proclaim “Brad Caught Sexting Aniston, Angelina kicks him to the curb!”

    I don’t think they are splitting. I think they probably feel a sense of “us against the world” the way all these tabloids are constantly fabricating an imminent demise, and nothing makes a relationship stronger than a common enemy.

    Just to shove it in the face of these tabloids, I hope Brad and Angelina stay together and raise 6 happy successful well adjusted adults. 3 of the kids become Doctors and work for Doctors Without Borders, and 3 become International Law Experts and work in the Hague prosecuting war crimes.

  14. voodoobetty says:

    @bite me – would your “sources” happen to be the voices in your head?

  15. bite me says:

    voodoobetty sarcasm my dear, ever heard of it

  16. Beth says:

    I don’t get why people say People Magazine is on Jolie-Pitt payroll. I get the magazine and they are barely in it. I think in the five years they’ve been together they’ve been on the cover six or seven times. Three of those times were for baby pictures. When they are in the magazine it’s for no different reason than other celebrities (movie premiers, award shows, etc). I don’t see any special treatment.

    As far as saying it’s true because denials are meaningless and it spread like wildfile that’s false. There have been at least four or five denials since their relationship began because everybody was reporting they brokeup, including the legitimate press. I think the last time was sometime last summer.

  17. Lizzard says:

    I’d hate to see this story be true, but I really don’t think it is.

    An unmarried couple wouldn’t be seeing a divorce lawyer, they would be in arbitration to work legal issues out. Right?

    I don’t consider any of these rumors to be true unless it is proven so by the party themselves or we are overwhelmed with supporting evidence. The people that are currently reporting this story are only naming the NOTW as their source, if they were able to prove it wouldn’t they also use back-up evidence they’ve collected to support this story?

  18. Huh? says:

    If you read they report, The Brange aren’t denying the split, *sources* are.

    Jus’ sayin’.

    And a divorce lawyer is exactly who two people with children would go to to equitably split property and set up visitation outside the courts. That’s just the term for it, not “separation lawyer”. The moniker is specific, but the laws and situations they deal with are broader.

    This is exactly why parents should be married– it’s not about their commitment to each other, the institution protects the children. It’s REALLY important in non LaLaland where assets are less and parents who hate each other use that hatred to deny kids support or keep them away from the other parent.

  19. Kathie says:

    I think these two have problems like everyone else. They have six kids, they’re both juggling a bunch of career obligations and even with all that money and help it can’t be easy. I wouldn’t be surprised if they split up because they have a 50/50 chance like just about every other married/committed couple. If it was easy a higher percentage of people would stay married/together. Maybe it was smart of them not to make it official and more complicated than it needed to be.
    Bravo! Bravo! CB this is what a well balanced article should look like you are exactly right!

  20. Cheyenne says:

    CB, you just scored the understatement of the decade: NOTW is “definitely not known for their integrity”. Over the past four years they have had to pay out millions of dollars in lawsuits after being found guilty of slander, libel and illegal wiretapping, and one of their editors went to jail on the wiretap case. If this story was fabricated, it would be interesting to know who paid them to do it and why.

  21. truthSF says:

    Praise St. Angie, if you look at this couple denial history, the only time they issue a denial is when legitimate news report on this B.S. like it’s true, as in this case when, CNN, Fox News, CBS Sunday Morning all reported this news as fact yesterday, and their go to source? News Of The World, go figure.

  22. andrea says:

    who the hell knows, maybe it’s true, maybe it’s not. i don’t think NOTW has much credibility but i also don’t think brangelina or hollywood denials have much credibility either. don’t like these two. not an aniston fan, am a fidelity fan. they lied and denied all the way through the start of their relationship, so i wouldn’t be shocked if they did the same through the end of it. maybe they’re happy as little clams. or maybe they don’t want to announce their split until after the oscars.

  23. lucy2 says:

    If it’s fabricated, I would assume it’s just like all the other fabricated stories about celebs out there – made up by the tabloids simply to sell papers.

    I think People mag is on ALL celeb’s payrolls! All they ever seem to have are puff pieces about how great they all are, and all of the articles sound like they were written by publicists, not journalists.

  24. ropuszka says:

    My theory is that People has the exclusive rights to the story and may have even already paid for it. But someone else got wind of it and leaked it before Peoples new issue with the EXCLUSIVE BRAD AND ANGELINA BREAK UP story in it came out. That may be why Brangelinas reps (that they supposedly never have) or sources are back tracking. I’m sorry but, a source is a source, neither more valuable or legit than the other. Either that or maybe they did meet with attorneys to hammer out a prenup. Doubtful, AJ always looks so vulnerable these days. I think she did something stupid and Pitt is in control of the realationship these days. I think she’s looking like a lovesick puppy when she’s with him or like she’s about to cry and run away. She appears to have an insecurity about her now that she didn’t have before. She looks nervous.

    That’s my theory and I sticking to it!!

  25. Kim says:

    US weekly rep said it wasn’t true on CBS morning News. So ET, Bill Zwicker , Chicago Sun Times, TMZ ,Perez, Extra, Billy Bush on AH, People,gossipcop, etc all said its BS. The only major outlets that say its true is Star and NE quoting NOTW. Star who claims she’s been pregnant(BABY # 7) 3 times in 2009,who claimed the twins were two girls(SHILOH CANT WAIT TO MEET HER SISTERS) and claimed Brad and Angie were married in New Orleans when they were in TX. NOTW is the slimiest( trying to get the Slumdog girl’s father to sell her) tabloid in Britain. If the Daily Mail or Daily Mirror said it it would have more credence

  26. truthSF says:

    It’s all about the 5 year mark. This month is the anniversary of B & J announcing their separation, and NOTW wants ppl to think that B & A is about to suffer the same fate.

  27. nnn says:

    Well until we see one of them moving out (like Brad was seen moving his things out of his house at the time of his seperation with his ex) with his things and packings in another place (which sould be easy to attest for those ‘super detectives’), until we see THIS evidence, they are not breaking up.

    Brad has several houses, it would be so easy to trace him with his things moving out from one home to another one.

    It’s always laughable that some people are so sure about them breaking up but unable to continue the leggit story, meaning, tracing who left who and where each of them are moving and who has the children, since this question is probably the main one that any couple with children will raise or adress BEFORE actually breaking up…an information so easy to get for those super detectives of the leggit media.

  28. Mimi says:

    I’m tired of this bullshit week after week and tired of u people saying the same BS that u BELIEVE is true because she is too thin or hes beard is ugly or photos of them walking into their cars.

    Grow up people how about U that are always expecting and wishing then to breakup for numerous reasons to come here and post pictures of u and ur family walking on the streets in a cool day or going to a store while hundreds of paps keep screaming ur kids names or ur name or insulting u to get a reaction… and then let’s all of us here Analise every picture, video and apparency of urs kids hair, clothes and how comported they are walking on the streets…I wish this was possible i doubt any of u would still be so critical or scream photo OP after this.

    How about for once have some kind of LEGITIMATE PROVE besides a TABLOID mag is that asking too much? Before some of u came here and said that they are over a billion years ago…

    Now in NEWS with PROVE Gerard B. was seeing kissing some random chick playing violin on the streets and paps have GASP PICTURES and PROVES so i’m guessing hes tired of kissing celebrity’s in the kitchen and is know checking out the streets…

    PS CB is better u start to learn how to play a instrument and start playing in front of ur house just in case he is around 🙂

  29. Maritza says:

    They need to show up at some event looking all lovey dovey so people will believe they are not breaking up.

  30. bite me says:

    someone on another site pointed out, that this is around the time that Jolie mom passed way… mabye that why they are not making public outing, espcially if they can help it

  31. Gistine says:

    I really hope this is not true. Not because I care, but because I do not want to hear about it for the next 20 years.

  32. Kim says:

    Marcheline her mom died Jan 27th 2007. As for the awards they don’t attend awards unless they are nominated. Brad was not nominated for GG as for the ensemble award for the SAG’s who knows. Showing up at an event looking lovey dovey will not help because the tabs will say they are faking it. IT weekly will have their body language expert analyze the photos. They can’t win.If they deny they are splitting they won’t be believe if they don’t deny people will say its true. Despite the fact that Brad has “WALKED OUT” 12 times in 2009 and Angie twice according to OUTATOUCH Weekly. I say just continue living their lives and ignore the hoopla

  33. nana says:

    many just doubt them because they cant see them everyday in the park smiling and modeling clothes all day like Gwen and her boys, Paris and the jobless Doug parading everyday holding hands or like Speidi who talks alot about themselves every minute. Rags cannot stalk Brange the way they can pap Rihanna, Lohan, Gosselins, Octomom etc everyday so they have to create JP issues to make them interesting and marketable.

  34. Cheyenne says:

    @ Maritza: If they show up looking all lovey-dovey at some event, then the haters will say they’re putting on an act and it’s just for show.

    Since they can’t win whatever they do, they should just do as they damn please. They don’t owe anyone any explanations. It’s ridiculous that people think any couple has to explain or justify their relationship. All they owe to the tabloids is two words: Fuck off.

  35. Love Eric says:

    Hope it’s not true…

    I like these two together. They fit in terms of glamour/star power.

    More importantly, they have six children. For the sake of the children, I hope they work through any difficulties. I think people throw in the towel too early these days. They aren’t willing to fight through rough patches. No matter how crappy things get, they can always get better (unless a spouse or the children are in danger due to one of the spouses-parents).

  36. Beachbum says:

    He could at least show up for the Award shows to support his movie and the supporting actor that is nominated. Can’t go alone??? I wonder how the cast feels?? How cliche…JMO

  37. She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named says:

    Actually, the cast probably feels relieved that Pitt didn’t show for the awards.
    If he did, they’d roll their eyes that he’s stealing the spotlight and making the movie all about him.

    If he’d gone, they probably wouldn’t have had ANY press time.

  38. princess pea says:

    To those saying “they can’t win” or “they’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t…”

    WIN and DAMNED and similar words imply that the Brange CARES what we think, that they care if we think they’re solidly in love or not. Why would they? If their relationship is happy, they don’t need the world to know to make it real. If it isn’t, again, I don’t think they’ll be tied up in knots over what Jane Doe thinks about it…

    For the record, I think it’s douchey not to show up and support the team. I thought it was douchey when Leonardo DiCaprio didn’t show at the Oscars to support Titanic because he wasn’t nominated, and I think it’s douchey now, too.

  39. Lola says:

    I’m with Ursula (#7). I thought the same thing.

  40. Cheyenne says:

    @ Maritza: OMFG, the Daily Mail?! 🙄 That’s in the same league with NOTW. The Brit tabloids make Star and the National Enquirer look like The New York Times. Just to give you an idea:

    April 27, 2007, film star Hugh Grant accepted damages over claims made about his relationships with his former girlfriends in three separate tabloid articles published in the Daily Mail.

    November 2009 – Actress Kate Winslet awarded £25,000 in damages after an article in the Daily Mail titled “Should Kate Winslet win an Oscar for the world’s most irritating actress?” accuses her of lying about her exercise regime.

    2009 – September — Metropolitan police commander Ali Dizaei accepts ‘substantial’ damages after a story falsely accusing him of being a bigamist.

    2009 – May — three women whose stories had appeared in an article about women who’d adopted children, suggesting they did so for ‘selfish’ reasons, were awarded £10,000 each in damages.

    2007 – May — Actress Keira Knightley awarded £3,000 for an article in which it was falsely claimed she was anorexic.

    2006 – May – £100,000 damages for Elton John, falsely accused of rude and dictatorial behavior.

    2006 – April — Undisclosed damages paid to actress Sharon Stone following a story falsely claiming she’d left her child in a car unattended while she ate at a nearby restaurant.

    2003- October — Actress Diana Rigg awarded £30,000 in damages over story which ‘wrongly portrayed her as an embittered woman who held British men in low regard’.

    The above is just a few of the lawsuits the Dail Mail has been involved in.

  41. Mave says:

    We all know in tabloid land that usually when the reports come rolling in like this everyone denys it and then it ends up to be true. I think Angelina statement about not needed to be faithful says it all. She has her sights set. The rest is history.

  42. snowball says:

    Not that it matters much, but that rag In Touch is on MSNBC confirming the story with their own independant sources.

  43. Solveig says:

    “Still, we don’t have a window onto their home life and have no idea what’s it’s like.”

    Amen, Kaiser, amen.

    “There’s a whole industry built up around trying to squeeze out the details of the lives of the rich and famous. When there’s not much information there, the tabloids make it up.”

    But I’d also add that personal issues are made public by famous people themselves, and this is obvious considering that the status of celebrity is based on the sensation they get from the public opinion and gossip magazines.
    I’m sure that if they split the bad one will be Angelina, who’s crazy, clingy, a control freak a bi-polar etc etc in public opinion, and Brad will be as clean, fresh and candid as a baby’s bottom.
    Call vox populi “misogynist”.

  44. Jojo says:

    Your headline is wrong, Celebitchy…Brad and Angelina haven’t denied anything, an unnamed source did.

  45. Bek says:

    I’m sure that none of the frazzled wish to hear this, but…
    if you can’t accept unnamed sources citing the end of Brangelina’s relationship, the fights, etc, then you shouldn’t cite unnamed sources as proof that all is well. It’s a little hypocritical. EVERY mag/site always says they have a “solid” source. So far, people are getting their denial information from an unnamed “rep” on Just Jared. All other denials are from the same unnamed sources. I’m not going to say anything either way, but this is obviously far from over. We’ll see. Everything comes to light eventually.

  46. Beth says:

    Why does it matter if the denial came from a source or from them? It wouldn’t change anything. Everybody would still say that they are lying about their relationship status. Also different sites say different things. They got confirmation from a source or a rep. Of course In Touch says the rumors are true. They’ve been saying that Brad and Angelina have been breaking up for 5 years. They also say Brad and Jennifer have been having an affair for months.

  47. Birdie says:

    @ princess pea

    Doesn’t it seemed like almost every celebrity couple is “damned if they do, damned it they don’t” in the sense of denying anything is wrong in their relationship/ on their movie set/ in their personal lives. Pitt & Jolie are just the most written about and high profile.

  48. anneesezz says:

    The only chance of a normal life for those kids is for Brad to be around; if they are left with their mother alone they will be f*cked up for sure. She is a whacko! It’s a slim chance they’ll be normal as it is living like nomads. I feel sorry for those kids.

  49. crash2GO2 says:

    Cheyenne, you’d better go back and fix your previous erroneously posted sources if you expect anyone to take your feverish research seriously. My, you really are emotionally invested in this couple aren’t you?

    And yes, CB, THEY haven’t denied anything. Nor has their family. Just nebulous sources ‘close to the family’.

  50. susie says:

    Its so sad. Those poor kids. I feel sorry for them.
    No stability. No schools. They just don’t need any more trauma. It can’t be easy having these two aa
    S parents. No matter what the new image is I have always seen angelina as emotionally unstable even fragile.
    Such a ssad situation.

  51. SageAdvice says:

    Yea, the reps denied, not Brange. But I don’t think they are breaking up. I will admit though, public figures lie about everything to the media especially stuff that has to do with their personal lives which might make them look bad. So until they have a John Edwards moment, I won’t believe the tabs.

    Anyway, i agree with Princess Pea-it is douchey not to show up to support the group. It seems like he’s saying “I’m too big of a star to be here if I won’t get anything out of it”.

  52. N.D. says:

    Why people are complaining about these kids not being in school all the time? If there are no pics it doesn’t mean they ain’t going there.

    Even paps admit that: quotes from latest x17 reports

    “All the children were at their LA-area school on Friday and we spotted them heading to classes this morning as well.”

    and

    “X17online can exclusively report that while the couple’s kids were in school in Los Angeles AS USUAL”

    Don’t know if they are paying paps off or arranged their arrivals so good pics can not be taken from outside but kids are in school all the time or at least all the time they’re living in LA which is like half of the time at least.

  53. Maritza says:

    In this article they say Angelina and Brad already have split and their prediction is that Angelina will hook up with a powerful politician, check it out:
    http://www.popeater.com/2010/01/25/brangelina-split-brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-ian-halperin/

  54. bite me says:

    Ian is the guy that wrote that stupid book about them…

  55. crash2GO2 says:

    @Maritza: I hate to say it, but everything he wrote rang true to me. Brad has looked sad and exhausted for quite a while now. I feel for all of them – the children especially. Such a waste.

  56. Cheyenne says:

    Critical thinking is your friend, Crashie. Melissa mentioned the Daily Mail as a news source; I gave her a few reasons why it isn’t an accurate source. As for Ian Halperin :roll:, CB and Kaiser have already written about that, so I won’t go there.

    Anyway, I’m done with this. Speculation is stupid. They could split up next week, next month, next year or never. If you want to waste your time on will-they-won’t-they-and-when, that’s your lookout. Me, I’d suggest you get a more rewarding hobby. Try reading tarot cards for a change.

  57. The root of your writing while sounding reasonable at first, did not sit very well with me after some time. Somewhere within the paragraphs you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a while. I however have got a problem with your jumps in logic and one might do well to help fill in those breaks. If you actually can accomplish that, I could surely be fascinated.