Kamala Harris will appear on the ‘Call Her Daddy’ podcast next week

In the past week, there have been a handful of national-media stories about What Kamala Harris Is Doing Wrong. Or “doing wrong, according to the national media.” I’m not going to pretend that I would like to see the Harris-Walz campaign tweak their strategies here and there in the final month of this neverending election cycle, but I’m also not going to pretend that I don’t see Politico’s agenda and the NY Times’ agenda and WaPo’s agenda. They’re mad that Kamala Harris is running a disciplined and smart campaign. They’re mad that she hasn’t given them any “gotcha moments.” They’re mad that she hasn’t f–ked up. And most of all, they’re mad that she’s not giving them unfettered access so that they can rip her to shreds.

Democratic operatives, including some of Kamala Harris’ own staffers, are growing increasingly concerned about her relatively light campaign schedule, which has her holding fewer events than Donald Trump and avoiding unscripted interactions with voters and the press almost entirely.

In interviews with POLITICO, nearly two dozen Democrats described Harris as running a do-no-harm, risk-averse approach to the race they fear could hamper her as the campaign enters its final 30-day stretch.

With early voting by mail and in person already underway in more than half of the country, Harris spent just three days of the last week of September in battleground states. On Sept. 28, when Trump gave a speech in Wisconsin before flying to Alabama for the Georgia-Alabama football game, Harris was attending a fundraiser in San Francisco. And beyond concerns about her schedule, Democrats argue that Harris would benefit from venues that allow her to introduce herself to voters in a more authentic way, such as town hall events, more sit-down interviews and unscripted exchanges with voters.

“There’s a time at which you just have to barnstorm these battlegrounds,” said David Axelrod, the longtime Democratic operative who helped lead Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns and was an early critic of President Joe Biden’s campaigning style. “These races are decathlons, and there are a lot of events, and you have to do all of them because people want to test you. It’s the most difficult oral exam on the planet for the most difficult job, and part of that is just that spontaneous — town halls, all kinds of interviews, and not just friendly interviews. OTRs where you interact in a substantive way with people, all of those things are valuable. And I would be doing them if I were her.”

[From Politico]

“And I would be doing them if I were her.” As in, David Axelrod is mad that VP Harris didn’t hire him. Axelrod is always convinced that female politicians are doing everything wrong – I remember how he sniped at Hillary Clinton from afar in 2016. Anyway, the real point is what Axelrod says here: “town halls, all kinds of interviews, and not just friendly interviews.” Axelrod is carrying water for Politico and the Beltway media because Harris continues to speak to outlets outside the Beltway. Speaking of, VP Harris is going on the Call Her Daddy pod, in an interview which will be released next week:

Vice President Kamala Harris will be a guest on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast next week, a campaign spokesperson confirmed to Axios Friday. Why it matters: The show, hosted by creator Alex Cooper, was Spotify’s second-biggest podcast last year and the most listened to among women.

Harris sat for an interview with Cooper Tuesday, and the episode will air next week. The conversation focuses on reproductive rights and abortion, along with other issues important to women in the upcoming election. Representatives for Cooper did not immediately respond to Axios’ request for comment.

Harris, who has continued to widen her advantage among women voters, has made abortion rights a defining topic of her campaign. Reproductive rights are among the key political issues exacerbating the wedge between male and female voters ahead of the November election, and a winning issue for Democrats in the post-Roe era. Harris’ appearance on “Call Her Daddy” highlights her campaign’s emphasis on appealing to women voters and younger audiences.

[From Axios]

Last week, VP Harris appeared on the All the Smoke pod too. The Call Her Daddy pod is going to be a lot different, and I imagine it will reach so many more people (women) than if Harris did an interview with WaPo or whatever. It’s a presidential candidate meeting people where they are, and in this case, specifically targeting a young female demographic with a winning message about their rights. Whenever I worry about the ghosts of the 2016 election, I remind myself that 2024 is fundamentally different because of Dobbs. This is the first presidential election after women’s reproductive rights were stripped away. In 2016, Hillary Clinton told everyone what could happen and she was widely mocked. Eight years later, people can see for themselves what happened and how awful it is.

PS… Can we PLEASE get an emergency Hot Ones episode with Kamala??? And someone suggested that Tim Walz should go on the New Heights podcast and I keep thinking that sounds like a great idea. Also, I just saw that Kamala will go on Howard Stern’s show next week too.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Kamala Harris will appear on the ‘Call Her Daddy’ podcast next week”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Oh come on. says:

    My 13yo athlete was delighted that she went in All the Smoke. Ofc he can’t vote and is already all in for Kamala, but he thinks it’s so cool that she knows about this podcast and goes on it—she seems so much more relatable than older politicians who don’t know their arse from their hip hop.

    > Whenever I worry about the ghosts of the 2016 election, I remind myself that 2024 is fundamentally different

    When the Dems nominate a dull, charisma-free candidate and tell the public to take their medicine and vote for policy (H Clinton, Kerry, Gore), we usually lose (except Biden won). When we nominate a charismatic, exciting candidate, we win handily.

    We have to work for every last vote. But I feel really optimistic that she’ll win by margins large enough to overcome all the Republican cheating. To me, this year feels more like 2008 than 2016 🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽

    • windyriver says:

      Don’t necessarily agree these Dem candidates were charisma free; nor how policy should factor into a decision. However, the truth is – Hillary Clinton actually won the popular vote by almost 3 million. And the Gore loss ultimately involved a Supreme Court decision. So not quite cut and dried. Kamala Harris is an exciting candidate, but also benefitting from a very short time frame between her confirmation as the candidate, and the election. A year or more on the campaign trail gives “interested” parties the opportunity to rip into her and gain more traction. I hope she rides this wave of enthusiasm to success. But the fact is, the country is divided enough that the presidential elections have been decided by popular votes just a few percentage points on either side of the 50% mark. Then there’s the impact of the EC.

      One thing the Clinton and Gore experiences definitely highlight is the importance of every vote. You never know when your vote will be one of the ones to help make a critical difference, especially in a contested state.

    • Bean says:

      If you think Hillary Clinton was dull and charisma-free, I’ve got news for you…
      Hillary Clinton treated the media as if they were a serious entity. They were descending into madness for clicks back then, but not nearly at the level of clownery we see now. They didn’t focus on anything but a non-story of emails. Why? Because if she talked to the NY Times, WAPO, etc. she wanted to talk policy. They wanted the circus of trump. She wouldn’t give it to them, so they punished her and blew the email scandal out of proportion while also speculating (with absolutely no proof) she had a serious illness.

      She is easily one of the most maligned politicians in our current age, and she’s far from boring or dull or charisma-free.

  2. Amy Bee says:

    When is she going on the Breakfast Club? I can’t stand Charlemagne but there’s no denying that the show has a huge audience.

    • CROWHOOD says:

      I’m not sure the breakfast club would have her on. Jess Hilarious is pretty vocally pro trump or at a minimum- anti Kamala.

      • Oh come on. says:

        I haven’t listened to the Breakfast Club but Charlemagne is on the Daily Show pretty often, and he is very solidly pro-Kamala, anti-Trump, and pro-GOTV.

  3. TeamAwesome says:

    If Tim Walz and his pupper can go on a walk with We Rate Dogs, surely we can get the MVP on Hot Ones! That would be such a great episode!

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    She needs to continue to do what she’s been doing. And when did Trump last do an interview that was anything less than friendly? Kamala is the one who wants another debate. Trump is the one who’s too scared to do Sixty Minutes. The corporate media is losing all relevance so they’re gaslighting us.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Just thought of something else to add here. The vice president is carrying the fate of not just American democracy but western democracy on her back. That’s a mighty heavy lift, but she is doing so with grace and determination. As Liz Cheney said (never thought I would be quoting her!), “She is standing in the breech.” I, for one, am eternally grateful to her for stepping up as she has to shoulder this burden for all of us and with much less time to prepare than all other modern candidates. With all the pressure and weight of expectations she is carrying, it would be helpful if David Axelrod would get off her back.

      • DK says:

        Yeah, the hypocrisy of Trump *never* doing MSM interviews, only Fox, etc. friendlies, is driving me nearly as mad as Axelrod criticizing the *actual, current Vice President,* who is out there still getting sh*t done for America in her current day job, for not just campaigning all the time.

        Axlerod can back the heck off with his washed up hot takes.

  5. ML says:

    1. Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton are two different people. I’m sick of guys (not women, guy Democrats) telling me about 2016.
    2. Kamala Harris is really strong with female voters! I’m not familiar with most of these podcasts, but even I have heard about CallHer Daddy. This is a great choice!
    3. Every flipping time Trump and Vance spew heinous isht, I hear complaints about the VP’s visibility and often snide comments about her choice of veep. Stop effing covering lies and acting like a megaphone for them, and accept that Harris choice Walz, not Shapiro.

    Kamala Harris has been to hurricane-devastated areas and knows about FEMA, while Trump is trying a Go fund Me grift.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Had she chosen Shapiro, the critics would find just as much fault with him. All the carping reminds me of Teddy Roosevelt’s Man In The Arena essay. Only in this case it’s the Woman In The Arena. The men are on the outside throwing stones.

      • pottymouth pup says:

        had she chosen Shapiro, the antisemitism would have increased more than it has and she would have lost a more significant chunk of the far left pro-Palestinian folks (as it is she’s primarily lost the Pro-Hamas folks and some of the not antisemitic Pro-Palestinian folks). Trump was prepared to run against Shapiro – that was abundantly clear at the Vance rally in Philly the day she announced Walz as her running mate (there was some lovely antisemitic compendium on media tables at Vance’s event). Tiffany Trump’s FIL has been hammering against Harris in Arab/Muslim communities in Michigan and other swing states w/sizable Arab/Muslim communities and is happy to get them to sit out the election as he knows they wouldn’t vote for Trump. They were also prepared to hammer on Shapiro’s piss-poor handling of the sexual harassment claims against his aid and his support for school vouchers. That would have gotten more on the left to abstain in protest.

    • PrettySwitching says:

      But Kamala and democrats should take some accountability for things that are happening now if she wants to show that she can be a leader for tomorrow, for example: the funding in FEMA – what is going on and how can it be solved, the Lebanese Americans who have been left stranded in Lebanon unless they pay their own way home. (Ironically when the money to attack Lebanon is being funded by the US military). If Kamala and the democrats can speak on this and how she plans on resolving it (rather than continuing to fund a genocide), then she can most likely build a bigger fan base. An enormous amount of Gen Z are still uncommitted of all beliefs/ faiths

      • Bean says:

        The funding of FEMA lies squarely in Congress. The White House and DHS has already said the current funding wasn’t enough. Direct the ire at the House Speaker who refuses to bring Congress back to pass a bill for more funding.

        I’m not even going to waste calories on the rest of this.

    • MichaelaCat says:

      The ways that 2016 is still relevant are as a lesson:

      1. Stop saying “both sides are just as bad”. (They are not, not even close).

      2. You have to vote and not rely on others to get the right candidate in.

      3 Talk about all the things the Democrats have accomplished. There are tons of these, but even the strongest supporters of Harris often don’t mention them. Even on this website, I saw nothing about pricing caps for medicine or getting rid of junk fees, for instance. Both things Harris worked for.

      They are all lessons that I hope the “look at me, I’m too woke to participate” have hopefully learned from.

      Has nothing to do with them being women, but it’s a lesson.

  6. TQ says:

    I think the Harris campaign is doing exactly what they need to do media wise by mixing it up and breaking the mould. This includes meeting young voters, communities of color and others in the media spaces/outlets where they hang/access — podcasts, local affiliates, etc. 2024 is a whole different media landscape than 2016 given the influence of social media etc., and the key media players are all different. The Axelrod & beltway obsession with her doing traditional media outlets, talking wonky policy details, etc. is so passé. That’s not the state of play with the US election nowdays. Keep it up, Kamala!

  7. Jilliebean says:

    Trump goes on the Nelk boys (who aren’t even american and they are crumby interviewers) but they have huge audience, he probably has been on joe Rogan and he was just on Theo von….

    This is a good thing that she’s doing a pod cast !

  8. Brassy Rebel says:

    Tim Walz was on Fox News this morning and did great even though Shannon Bream was trying to shame him over our progressive, woman-centered abortion law here in Minnesota which he signed. He refused to give an inch. Then I watched a teaser clip of Kamala from 60 Minutes. Tricky question on the Mideast. She nailed it. I am so happy that these two are our candidates. Now, let’s get to work!

  9. orangeowl18 says:

    She’ll be on 60 Minutes tonight. Not exactly known to be fluff. So we can be sure those goalposts will be moved again!

  10. Jay says:

    Kamala also did a Wired auto complete interview, although the searches/ answers were carefully vetted.

    And yes, I would love to see her on Hot Ones, but in the past, the show was supposedly reluctant to feature current politicians. No idea if that is official policy or if that could have changed.

    I think MVP (love this nickname) would acquit herself well, but I could also see her team not loving the lack of control – what makes the show great is that it breaks the traditional “media training”. People may end up crying, blabbering, and drooling on camera. So I could see an argument from her team that the risks might outweigh any rewards. Luckily, there are other options to reach the remaining voters where they are ( and it’s definitely not more mainstream media, haha David Axelrod). Podcasts, YouTube channels, satellite radio like Stern – these are slam dunks. I’d also pitch her to do more cooking content on YouTube if she can!

  11. FancyPants says:

    Is this even correct? It feels like The Meidas Touch podcast is putting out a hot take on one of her speeches or interviews every single day.