None of Australia’s state premiers have RSVP’d for King Charles’s reception

King Charles and Queen Camilla leave for their 10-day tour of Australia and Samoa this week. The Australian leg of their tour officially begins on Friday, and it looks like they will only visit Sydney and Canberra. There will be a major reception in Canberra at Parliament House, which will be attended by Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. It’s looking PM Albanese will basically be the only Australian government official there though – the state premiers of Australia have all been invited and none of them are going?

King Charles has been given a “slap in the face” by Australian politicians after he’s snubbed ahead of his visit Down Under. The monarch, 75, is jetting to the other side of the world for a nine-day tour with Camilla by his side this week.

Both King and Queen will start their trip in Sydney on October 18 before heading to capital Canberra three days later for a banquet with senior politicians. But while all State Premiers have been invited, not one has accepted to welcome Charles and Camilla at the reception, it’s reported.

Bev McArthur, spokesperson for the pro royal Australian Monarchists League called the lack of attendees a “slap in the face” to the Royal Family. She told the Herald Sun: “All premiers and ministers have sworn allegiance to our monarch, Charles III, and it is a monumental insult that they now spit in his hand extended in friendship. This is a historic opportunity to unite Australia, to focus on charitable work and to give back to communities. Yet our immature politicians are clearly choosing to play politics.”

Charles is set to address the event where political and community leaders, as well as talented Australians in art, culture and sport, will attend. But suspected excuses have poured in from state leaders. Victoria state Premier Jacinta Allan on Sunday added her name to those that have turned Charles down. Queensland Premier Steven Miles claims he has work to do on his election campaign. Meanwhile, a spokesman for Western Australia’s Premier, Roger Cook, reportedly said he had “other commitments”. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas has also excused himself due to a regional cabinet meeting, as did New South Wales Premier Chris Minns. Minns is expected to attend several other events with the King during his time in Aus.

[From The Sun]

This is hilarious. I wondered if Charles would get a less-than-enthusiastic reception in Oz, but I thought that Australians would at least greet him with some sympathy because of his cancer. Turns out, not so much. Turns out, people just don’t give a f–k. You’ve got to think that Buckingham Palace would have preferred silent antipathy over Australian officials publicly declaring “I have to wash my hair that night” when invited to a reception with the king.

Meanwhile, the Australian Republican Movement is selling special merch for Charles and Camilla’s tour. ARM is calling this the Windsors’ “farewell tour” Down Under: “On satirical posters, T-shirts, beer coasters and other paraphernalia, ARM’s campaign depicts the King, Queen and Prince of Wales as aging rock stars and urges Australians ‘young and old’ to ‘wave goodbye to royal reign’.”

It’s worth considering the fact that this is the first “major royal tour” to Australia undertaken by senior royals since Harry and Meghan’s tour in 2018. The Sussexes’ tour was hugely successful, showcasing the Windsors’ two most charismatic rock stars and soft-power diplomats. That was also the tour which scared the sh-t out of the Windsors. The smear campaign was launched soon after. Everything these horrible people wished for Harry and Meghan has come back on the Windsors tenfold.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

return home

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

66 Responses to “None of Australia’s state premiers have RSVP’d for King Charles’s reception”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Down with crown. Abolish the monarchy!

    • JustBitchy says:

      Inspiration for Australians – head to the de Valera section

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_Allegiance_(Ireland)

    • TheFarmer'sWife says:

      Charle’s “health” will likely take a turn tomorrow or Thursday. He and his side chick will have to “regrettably cancel” their planned tour of Oz. Hopefully, those involved haven’t spent too much cash money on this waste of time trip. If he does go, I hope they don’t force schoolchildren to stand about waving flags and cheering for the doddering old man and his booze-hound side chick as they stagger out of various vehicles. Get the hint, Chuckles, stay home.

  2. What do you do on a “working royal tour” when nobody will meet with you?

    • Pink tutu says:

      Eat lavish meals. Get shown around. Meet the pollies who are sycophants.

      They’re touring gardens, war memorial. Meeting children in some library. And prominent people blah blah blah oh and doing something on Sydney harbour. But mostly nice meals.

    • TheFarmer'sWife says:

      He could always call Peggy! His official visits have been wildly unattended. Oh wait, he hasn’t done any…just those jaunts to Scotland where everyone had better things to do.

  3. SarahCS says:

    I love this for him/them.

    Charles: I’ll show them I’m not dead, Australia here I come!
    Australia: (shrugs, heads off to do something actually important)

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Love that they are getting snubbed it is the welcome they deserve.. been laughing at all the articles. This tour is a disaster and it hasn’t even begun yet.🤣😂🤣

  4. Chloe says:

    I might just follow this so I can see the contrast between this tour and Meghan and Harry’s visit to Nigeria and Colombia.

    If there is anyone Australian on here can I ask you guys a question?: Can a politician opt out of the oath to the monarch, when sworn into office?

  5. HellNah! says:

    Ridiculously wasteful! Their presence guarantees failure.

  6. s808 says:

    They have not hand a single successful tour since H&M. They’ll be a local monarchy soon enough.

  7. Shelly Bean says:

    We have State Governments and a Federal Government. They are separate. The State Premier’s aren’t going, but I’m pretty sure a lot of Federal Parliamentarians will be there from all the different states, especially the Liberal Party ones (which is our Conservative Party.)
    No one cares though. The only reason I even know they are going to be down here is from reading your website.

  8. Aerie says:

    “Yet our immature politicians are clearly choosing to play politics.”

    Isn’t this what they’re supposed to do?

    • Chrissy says:

      LOL! Isn’t their job to represent their constituents views? I look forward to seeing them booed and embarrassed!

    • AMB says:

      …. said the “spokesperson for the pro royal Australian Monarchists League”. While simultaneously clutching her pearls, elevating her nose and shaking a forefinger at the naughty republicans, no doubt.

      • Snaggletooth says:

        Yes one would think the immature ones are those who play dress up in magic capes and wigs and use made up terms for fairy tale “royals” as if royalty has any meaning these days

  9. aquarius64 says:

    This is embarrassing for Charles, and it’s deserving. Karma for what BP and KP have done to the Sussexes. And bringing the woman he cheated on his first wife with, to the country where the first wife knocked it of the park?

  10. Ariel says:

    If the aus politicians are so openly anti monarchy- how is it they haven’t tossed off British ceremonial rule yet?
    What are they waiting for?

    • twoz says:

      1) There was a referendum in ’99 which was basically designed to fail by Howard (ultra-conservative PM at the time) and his ilk.
      2) There was a lot of respect for Elizabeth and her legacy and it was pretty much agreed that nothing would be done until she went
      3) We also had a referendum on allowing our First Nations people a Voice in the Constitution about a year back, if you remember? It was thought to be a formality until the Murdoch media and Dutton mounted a particularly nasty campaign against it. So I doubt there’s going to be any more referendums until after the next election.

      • seaflower says:

        Agreed. I said on here the other day, I think we are about 15 years off another chance for a go at a republic – the old school right wing/conservative political types and Murdoch will continue to stir up the hate, and the last of the boomers need to move into full retirement/be out numbered.

  11. Miranda says:

    Damn, I’m like, thisclose to feeling bad for him…but no. The BRF has played themselves. Hard. Many, many times, in fact. But between this, W&K’s shitshow in the Caribbean, and protesters and low interest for their events back home, it’s looking like this time it’s gonna stick. Couldn’t happen to more deserving parasites.

  12. Becks1 says:

    *snort* aw poor Charles and Camilla. If only they had someone in the family that was charismatic and excelled at these types of tours and who people actually wanted to meet, they maybe could have avoided this embarrassment.

    I mean, these people really thought that after they shoved out H&M, the public would be clamoring to meet with Charles, Camilla, William, and Kate. Its not like there’s a long line of people dying to meet with ANY royal. The excitement was specifically for H&M.

  13. Jais says:

    The outrage that spokesperson is feeling, omg. She’s making it worse. Calling it a slap in the face, like spitting in Charles’ hand, and then calling them immature for refusing to meet. Like, she just made it worse and drew more attention to this metaphorical slap in the face. Way to give the press a headline.

  14. Feebee says:

    To be fair they did RSVP, it’s just that all the RSVPs were ‘No, thanks’. One was away, another had ‘internal and external things organised’ and while this wasn’t said at this time, one indicted he was a bit of a fan of Harry’s. Oh dear.

    We’re going to hear about this for weeks because the English press will be accompanying Charles. I don’t suppose Camilla will sit in the car awaiting the end of a visit somewhere this time.

    Have fun Australia. We’ll look on silently thanking the universe he’s bypassing us on the way to Samoa.

  15. Aimee says:

    Harry should schedule a tour down there and then watch the palace freak out when he’s warmly received by all.

  16. Chaine says:

    What is the benefit to Australians of this continuing obligation of fealty to a monarch who almost never visits from his seat on the other side of planet earth

    • seaflower says:

      None other than a sense of identity for older ones. For many my age and younger, we recall when they were so willing to dump us for the EU/common market, and then expect us to be happy when they wanted trade ties again at Brexit. That coincided with their appalling treatment of H&M, WanK wanting to come out in the middle of our worst bush fires (resoundingly pushed back against), W not bothering to show for the Lionesses WCF (and the contrast to Letitia’s authentic enthusiasm for her team)… people see that we are only considered useful when the BRF/UK in general want something and the younger generations are just not interested.

  17. Inge says:

    “All premiers and ministers have sworn allegiance to our monarch”

    Arent they forced to do this?

    • Sydneygirl says:

      Yes. It’s part of the oath of office they take to the Governor General ie the Monarch’s representative in Australia.

  18. Ocean Girl says:

    “Bye-bye empire, empire bye-bye” (Thomas Dolby).
    With all due respect to those who perished in the wreck of the P48 submarine during WWII.

  19. Roo says:

    Perhaps by swearing allegiance, they all mean to force Chuck to think about the power and goodwill he’s wasted terrorizing his daughter in law and insulting his younger son? Perhaps allegiance is tough love? The politicians are still upholding their vows.

  20. Chrissy says:

    Watch the British press stomp their feet, scream and throw up about this in the next few days: “How dare you Australians not kiss the feet of the lying, cheating and cancer-stricken Colonizer King and his non-Diana Side Piece! This is all Meghan’s fault! She put you up to this, didn’t she?” I wait with bated breath.

  21. Bamaborn says:

    Well, one thing Charles should be given credit for and that’s persistence. He’s decided to drag his bovine around till end times to prove their nasty and hateful campaigns were well worth it. Everyone can see it led to this beautiful “Love Story.” *puke*

  22. lanne says:

    They sure do feel entitled to public adoration, don’t they.

    British royals: exist
    Global public….
    British royals: WHY ARENT YOU WORSHIPPING US?

    Um… maybe it doesn’t help that you tossed out your best ambassadors for 2 generations in a row.

  23. Giddy says:

    That picture of Charlie in the velvet robe complete with train and pageboy is a killer. Whenever I see it I just have to laugh at the stupidity of what they hoped would look so very regal. Go home Charlie, no one cares.

  24. Jks says:

    When Charles snubs Harry, it’s wonderful but when Charles is snubbed, it’s rude?

    Lmao. Cry harder.

    • Tara says:

      There is also this story from this Aussie man, Simon Dorante-Day, who thinks he is a lovechild of Charles and Camilla. I am wondering if this story will come to the surface again.

      • lanne says:

        I love that for them. It’s so ridiculously 90’s soap opera–all the American soaps had “long lost children” where the mother “had amnesia” and forgot she was pregnant and gave birth to a child. Does this gentleman account for the time when Queen Horsetoofs would have had be be “indisposed” and absent from view?

        Anyway, I’m looking for another picture of the Clodhopper sulking in the car, or does she just do that around Africans?

  25. blue says:

    Is Chuck actually wearing that costume in public? Why? He looks like an extra from an opera, but it is nearly Halloween. I feel sorry for the kid stuck in costume holding up the cape.

  26. swaz says:

    Charles deserves all of it 😜 it could’nt have happen to a better person 😎

  27. SheLurks says:

    I am following this tour with great amusement. Who else can snub them?! “I’m washing my hair that night” is such a great call for what’s happening here.

    I’ll say it again – that referendum can’t come quickly enough. The BRF really has no place here in Aus anymore.

  28. Blujfly says:

    It was a huge, unforced error to essentially take off a year after the queen died. These tours all should have been conducted, and by the “stars,” aka the King and Prince of Wales, 6 months after her death. Cloaked in mourning and draped in her “legacy.” Instead they have waited, parts of the family are ill, and everyone can see behind the curtain. He is forcing himself to even do this tour because of how desperately necessary it is if you’re a royalist.

  29. ML says:

    “ King Charles has been given a “slap in the face” by Australian politicians after he’s snubbed ahead of his visit Down Under. ”

    Well, considering that KC was not entirely welcome, the Australian politicians were given a “slap in the face” by KC for making them agree to an expensive, unpopular tour in the first place.

  30. Jay says:

    Yeah, how much you wanna bet that the “cabinet meeting” two of the premiers are citing as a reason not to attend was specifically scheduled to give them this excuse?

  31. Beverley says:

    Karma is a grown and sexy bitch.

  32. QuiteContrary says:

    Karma took its damn time, but it’s coming now for the royals, and it’s delicious.

  33. Jaded says:

    Henceforth it should be called the “I’m washing my hair that night” tour. Or how about the “I’m rearranging my sock drawer that night” tour…the “I’m cleaning the cat litter that night” tour. The relevance of the BRF is fading astonishingly fast.

  34. Latine says:

    I’m surprised. Seems their press tried to emulate England. I guess the general public is like “NOPE, cant afford you chuck” then the politicians went like “im not taking a hit to greet camilla”. Wonder if Chuck went by himself would this be going better. Lol.

    Is gift-giving mandatory. Are there ticket sales. I, an American, would pay to see Chuck once. If I was a subjected I wouldn’t pay at all. Taxes already cover a hello.

  35. Gabby says:

    This is just glorious.

    Bev McArthur, bless your simple little heart, sugar. The premiers and ministers swore allegiance to the monarch because they were forced to, not because they feel it. And this issue HAS united Australia just not in the direction you wanted. Suck it up.

    This is a slap in the face to Charles and a fart in the face to Camilla. Speaking of farts in the face, does anyone see the connection here to her public attempt at humiliating POTUS and the fact that other political figures want to give her a wide berth? Because I do.

    And for Chuckles, this Aussie slap in the face is the junior varsity level one, to prepare him for the real slap in the face (paired with a past-due reparations invoice) he will receive at the CHOGM.

    I love this tour already.

  36. yipyip says:

    Dear King Charles,
    Yeah, heard you are coming to Oz.
    Sadly we have plans and are not available to attend or make time for a photo with you.
    At all. Ever. Even if you & Cam want to wear your silly feathered hats and velvet robes.
    Best Regards,
    The entire population of Oz.
    One or two of our Grans might come to see you but, ya know, no promises.

  37. Vuyelwa Ncube says:

    Kwa kwa kwa kwa should have stayed home and continued his non treatment instead of trying to outshine Harry

  38. yipyip says:

    Trump did a rally in MN earlier this summer, within 50 miles of my town.
    Why anybody would spend a warm Saturday afternoon going to see that fool is beyond me.
    Chuck and Cam = same.

    Now, if Diana had ever been within a 1K miles of me, I’d have worked out a plan and slept in the cold over night, for the chance to try to see her. I’d also have been shouting “Love You Diana” at the top of my lungs. Diana was the best Royal of that generation.
    Chuck and Cam, stay home.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment