Prince Harry’s lawsuit against the Mail will move to trial in ‘early 2026’

Prince Harry’s lawsuit against the Murdoch family’s News Group Newspapers will move ahead to trial early next year. It will begin in January and it’s expected to go on for six to eight weeks. It’s very possible that the trial will still be on-going when the Invictus Games start in Canada. I’m pointing that out because we’ll get a blitz of horrible stories about Harry and Meghan starting in the new year, if not earlier. But it looks like the NGN lawsuit was taking up a lot of space, so much so that many forgot that Harry is also suing the f–k out of the Mail. He hasn’t settled anything with the Mail, and now that lawsuit has a potential trial date for early 2026.

Prince Harry and other high-profile British figures’ privacy lawsuits against the Daily Mail newspaper’s publisher will go to trial in early 2026, London’s High Court heard on Tuesday, with the parties’ legal costs set to exceed 38 million pounds ($47.8 million).

Harry, the younger son of King Charles, is one of seven claimants suing Associated Newspapers over allegations of voicemail interception – commonly known as phone-hacking – and other serious privacy breaches dating back 30 years. Associated, which also publishes the Mail on Sunday, has always denied involvement in unlawful practices. Its lawyers said in filings for a preliminary hearing on Tuesday that the claimants’ allegations were “firmly denied”.

The publisher’s attempt to throw out the lawsuits was rejected last year, paving the way for a trial which the claimants and Associated say should begin in early 2026. Lawyers representing the claimants, who also include singer Elton John and actors Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost, expect to spend around 18.4 million pounds up to and including the trial, with Associated incurring nearly 20 million pounds, according to court filings made public on Tuesday.

Harry and the other claimants’ lawsuits, which were filed in 2022, marked the first time Associated had been dragged into the phone-hacking scandal, which emerged more than a decade ago and prompted a public inquiry into the ethics of the press and several criminal trials. It also sparked long-running litigation against Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper arm, News Group Newspapers, and the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN).

Harry’s case against Associated is one of several he has brought against British media organisations as part of his “mission” to purge executives and editors whom he accuses of spreading lies and intruding into people’s lives.

The prince accepted substantial damages from MGN to settle the remainder of his phone-hacking lawsuit, having been awarded 140,600 pounds (around $178,000) after the High Court ruled he had been targeted by journalists.

[From Reuters]

We still don’t know the final number of the settlement between Harry and Mirror Group, but MGN did settle the rest of Harry’s claims. It’s an open question as to whether NGN and Associated will make Harry an offer he can’t refuse, if they haven’t done so already. The way the NGN outlets attack Harry on a daily basis, it doesn’t look like they believe they have a strong case. The Mail is trickier though – Meghan’s lawsuit was successful, but it came at a personal cost. If the Mail tries to settle, I suspect they’ll make an offer after the NGN case wraps up (depending on the result).

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

12 Responses to “Prince Harry’s lawsuit against the Mail will move to trial in ‘early 2026’”

  1. Friendly Crow says:

    I fully support Harry in whatever decisions he makes regarding these lawsuits. To continue or to settle.

    I think that they are important and he’s gotten a lot out into the public eye snd the public domain. I love that he’s been such a champion of an ethical journalism and an advocate against media harassment / smear campaigns.

    However far he takes this, he’s accomplished some great things that he can be proud of.

    The world is going to look very very different in Jan 26 in many ways that are impossible to predict. How this will affect Harry’s court cases in an unknown.

    I wish him and his all the best.

    • Julia says:

      Harry’s court cases are taking place in the UK and although the UK legal system is not perfect a court case about illegal information gathering is unlikely to be affected by world events

  2. Jegede says:

    2026?? Christ.😨😨😨😨

    And it follows with a 2027 Invictus return to Blighty.

  3. QuiteContrary says:

    Harry is brave as hell. He has far more character than all of the left-behinds combined.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Absolutely, his bravery in fighting for the truth and exposing the mafia tactics of the tabloid media is unmatched by that childishly petty and talentless family. I’m hoping PH wins, but most importantly I hope he and his family are safe throughout this process.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    I think for Harry to agree to settle with the Sun, he would want the paper would have to admit to wrongdoing and to issue an apology. I don’t think they would agree to that. Same goes for DM.

  5. Advisor2u says:

    I will say this, if Prince Harry (for whatever reason, money might be one) has to choose which of these lawsuits to pursue, I hope he continues with his case against The Daily Mail & MOS (Rothermere ). The vile lies, the daily hateful pieces, the bullying, the invasion of his privacy and character assassination by this tabloid(s) since a week after his courtship with Meghan was leaked by the palace, and continued for the last 8+ years, are dehumanising, horrible and terrifying. These two papers are the ones who published the first racist articles about Meghan, they are the ones who publicly weaponised her white family against her.

    No normal human being could endure this kind of vicious and unwarranted attacks. And no one from the royal family or the palace, or the late queen, or his father/the current king, have ever defended him and Meghan against this continued media violence from the entire British press/media. Based on what we know now, we can safely assume that a few senior royals ordered this violence for their own reasons.

    It is unimaginable that this kind of large-scale, industry-wide media harassment of a citizen/2 citizens of any country can take place without any consequences for, or accountability of the guilty.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment