Will King Charles ban Prince Andrew from attending Christmas at Sandringham?

Here are some photos of King Charles on Friday, attending one of his favorite events – the Crafts at Christmas showcase at Highgrove Gardens. That’s where local craftspeople and artisans showcase their work – I think for sale? – at Charles’s Highgrove estate. He loves that kind of thing and he was delighted. Unfortunately, this was one of the few delights left in the Christmas season. Charles had his Christmas agenda set: Project Snub The Sussexes 2024. Charles and Camilla invited their extended families to Sandringham for Christmas and palace insiders could not shut up about how Charles would host “the largest Christmas gathering in years.” Of course, Charles was making a point to tell everyone that Harry, Meghan, Archie and Lilibet are not invited. And then Prince Andrew blew up the plan with his Chinese spy drama, which broke last week. Andrew had been providing access to a Chinese spy for several years… and now it’s ruined Charles’s Christmas agenda.

The royal family is unusual in many respects, and punishing people by not allowing them to go to church is one of their oddities.Such a sorry fate potentially awaits Prince Andrew, with speculation rife that King Charles may distance himself from his brother on Christmas Day amid controversy that Andrew allegedly befriended a Chinese spy. A report in the London Times said the king “could” ban the duke from joining the royals on their annual walk to church in Sandringham.

Andrew was previously banned from attending the Christmas Day service (and photocall) after his disastrous BBC interview in which he failed to express any regret for his association with Jeffrey Epstein. He was readmitted to royal churchgoing society in 2022, but it now looks like the rehabilitation is over.

Supporting the thesis of the Times story, The Daily Beast was told by a friend of the king, “His Majesty’s patience is wearing thin. He has stood by Andrew for many years, but everyone has their limits. I can’t see the king wanting to walk to church with someone who was friends with a Chinese spy.”

Buckingham Palace declined to comment but another friend of the king said: “Andrew is finished. You would have thought it would be hard to find a way to make things worse but somehow he has managed it.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Notice how they’re talking around whether Andrew is still invited to Christmas at Sandringham and they’re making it all about the church walk on Christmas morning. That’s because Charles is too chickensh-t to actually disinvite or outright ban Andrew from Sandringham. It’s gotten so bad, Charles’s minions ran to Becky English at the Mail to rant about it. The basic gist is that Charles is exerting public pressure on Andrew to not come to Sandringham:

As the nation prepares to sit down and break bread with their nearest and, ahem, sometimes not so dearest this season of Goodwill, the King is facing a particularly vexing Christmas conundrum. What on earth to do about his bothersome brother, Prince Andrew, whose issues seem to pop up like a particularly bad bout of the annual festive flu. For the truth is that the King doesn’t want to have to go so far as to ban Prince Andrew from joining the rest of the Royal Family for the much-loved Sandringham church visit and walkabout. He is, at the end of the day, his blood brother: he can’t divorce him, or indeed prevent him from seeing other family members.

But he is desperately hoping the Duke of York will ‘do the decent thing’ and ‘recuse’ himself from joining them at Sandringham to spare the rest of the Royal Family further embarrassment following his latest, and potentially highly politically damaging, scandal, having a suspected Chinese spy as a ‘close confidant’ and trusted business adviser. As it stands, I am told, Andrew is due to join the rest of the family in Norfolk next week for the festive gathering. He and his ever-expanding family – including his ex-wife, the Duchess of York, and daughters Princess Beatrice and Eugenie and their children – had been expected to take over Wood Farm, a large property on the royal estate.

Now, engulfed in yet another furore of his own making, pressure is being placed on the duke to ‘see sense’. Friends suggest Andrew, 64, must know his presence will put His Majesty in a very awkward position. If he allows him to attend it will be tantamount to putting his arm around his brother’s shoulder in a very visible manner just days after he became embroiled in an explosive ‘spy’ scandal. But to ‘ban’ him would be the equivalent to a public excommunication – and with all the apron strings finally cut, who knows what the duke might do next?

Andrew, I understand, will still have the chance – should he so wishes – to see his family at the private pre-Christmas lunch the King throws his extended family (the cousins, nieces and nephews who don’t make the cut to Norfolk) this week – but a discreet entrance and exit, at least, would be appreciated. But after that? Well, sources say, surely it is a matter for that much-vaunted sense of ‘honour’ Andrew told us all he had during his infamous 2019 interview in the wake of Epstein scandal and to politely withdraw from all royal festivities, for this year at least. His family would certainly be grateful for it, I suspect, and he might even earn some respect.

[From The Daily Mail]

Becky English devoted the second half of the piece to ranting about Royal Lodge and how Andrew could still live in Frogmore Cottage free of charge if only he would give up his home. The whole “But to ‘ban’ him would be the equivalent to a public excommunication …who knows what the duke might do next?” thing is about Harry. They’re emphasizing that Harry has been excommunicated, that Harry is unwelcome, that Charles doesn’t worry about his other blood relation, his younger son. Even before the spy business blew up, it already looked awful that Charles was making such a BFD about “big family gathering for Christmas” while pointedly excluding his son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren. That’s also why I think Andrew will be welcome at Sandringham, but yeah, he probably won’t go on the church walk.

Update: After all of that, Andrew has apparently told Sky News that he and Fergie will not go to Sandringham for Christmas.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

27 Responses to “Will King Charles ban Prince Andrew from attending Christmas at Sandringham?”

  1. Maxine Branch says:

    Performative.

    • Eurydice says:

      Of course. According to the articles, Charles had been told about this back in 2021, when the spy was being investigated (incidently, before Elixabeth died). So, the problem seems not so much what Andrew did, but that the public found out about it.

      • Libra says:

        Exactly why such a furor over Spare. They didn’t deny anything written, just that Harry told everyone. ” The truth will set you free” is a foreign idea to Charles.

    • Becks1 says:

      Remember even the year when he didn’t do the church walk, Charles went to church with him earlier that morning (in the car). so even then he was still showing more support for Andrew than for Harry.

  2. Louise177 says:

    Andrew probably won’t do the Christmas walk but he’ll be at Sandringham. Based on the last 5 years, Andrew can do whatever he wants and Charles doesn’t really care. He still attends most of the family and high profile events.

  3. Josephine says:

    “punishing people by not allowing them to go to church is one of their oddities”

    That is not an oddity. That is so telling of the dismal morals of the royals. English is showing the world that going to church is performative only for the royals and used to grant and deny access. Vile. Yet another family that wields religion like a weapon and has no concept of faith or Christianity. Their inability to understand Christianity is up there with their inability to know what a day of work feels like.

  4. Amy T says:

    OMG, this family…..California would be too close if they were my relatives!

  5. Smart&Messy says:

    I love the behind-bars photos. He was so stupid to let that photo happen. I know it’s probably a fence he walked by, but still.

  6. Jais says:

    The way she talks about the Christmas party for all the cousins who don’t make the cut to Norfolk. You’d think it was some terrible fate.

  7. Alex Can says:

    Charles accepted a suitcase full of cash from a Qatari sheikh, millions of euros. Umm maybe we should still talk about that.

  8. somebody says:

    I don’t see why anyone wants to go to any of their Christmas PR doings.

  9. Amy Bee says:

    If Charles didn’t allow Andrew to return to the Christmas walk a few years ago, he wouldn’t have this problem now. Anyway, considering the comments being made by pundits on British media, the press are very sympathetic to Andrew’s situation so I’m not going to be surprised if Andrew’s on the Christmas walk.

  10. Kristen from MA says:

    Younger readers might not get the reference, but Andrew is the Billy Carter of the Windsors.

  11. Gabby says:

    I cannot think of anyone more deserving of having their Christmas agenda ruined than the petty, gutless King Tampon. He is a worthless king, person, husband, brother, son, father, grandfather, slumlord, need I continue?

    Consider Andrew aside from the Epstein-connected pedo behavior. He befriended a Chinese spy and invited him to the palace. Are there state defense secrets being stored in the palace? No. What intelligence could this spy have obtained by hanging around with Andrew?

    Tell me how this is worse than the king enriching himself on the backs of UK taxpayers via the duchy’s actions. You can’t.

  12. ML says:

    Who knows what Paedrew would do?

    THIS is the reason KC and the rest continue to welcome PA to the fold, whereas H&M have been banned. Odd, no? Plus, this handwringing is only since this news broke: as Eurydice pointed out, WHAT PA did has been known for years, and the knowledge this would drop has been there for weeks.

    Presumably, if PA were to be cut off, he’d need to join the real world and learn to live on an homest wage. Or be arrested.

    • sunnyside up says:

      He has a navy pension and it is not long before he gets the state pension assuming that he has paid into it. He can live a modest life on that.

  13. Whalesnark says:

    I repeat my earlier comment: his outside now matches his inside. He looks like that creepy prince that Paul Rubens played on 30 Rock.

  14. tamsin says:

    So the Windsors are reduced to being parasites living off the tax-payers, and grifters peddling influence to the Russians, Chinese, and Middle Eastern countries. They are truly an unsavory family. I still fail to see how the Windsors think that stories of evicting, endangering, and “snubbing” your own child is a good look, especially if that child is out doing good in the world. Fighting with your heir, abusing your first wife, being controlled by your mistress. By his testy relationship with William and his abuse of Harry and Meghan and their children, Charles is trying to destroy everything that was Diana’s.

  15. Brit says:

    The way this is being reported in the press, especially the UK, it seems everyone has conveniently forgotten about Anthony Blunt

    https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a29310542/anthony-blunt-queen-elizabeth-the-crown-curator-russian-spy-true-story/

    • GMH says:

      What silliness this all is. All about the narcicism and self aggrandizement of the RF. The spy debacle is meaningless for the RF. It’s not as if Andrew has and privileged info for the Chinese to tap. But for them to admit this would make the point that the monarchy is toothless. So they go on fanning the flames over a matter that really does not involve them.

      • Eurydice says:

        I don’t think anyone believes Andrew knows state secrets. But what Andrew can do, and has done, is to get spies in the door so that they can find others who know things. This was part of the email revelations from the other day – that he was able to help circumvent security and also get certain certain difficult palace officials out of the way.

  16. Over it says:

    I can’t stand Becky the racist B , but let’s face it . She works for the Windsors. That’s her job . She just uses the daily mail to make it appear otherwise . However charles is Satan. The fact that he has more compassion for his brother than he does his own son all because his son married a black woman says it all. Chuck is facing the struggles he deserves

  17. kelleybelle says:

    Ugly souls, inside and out. Just thoroughly nasty and profoundly dishonest.

  18. Blujfly says:

    The reporting also claims that Eugenie and Beatrice already were planning to spend Christmas with their in laws. So who is even attending Charles “biggest ever” family celebration? The Parker Bowles.

    Also, dollars to donuts Andrew is there Boxing Day for the shooting.

    • Anonymous says:

      Seems the York family including the sisters’ respective inlaws all will celebrate at the Royal Lodge. At least they will have fun.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment