Prince Andrew is apparently ‘seriously contemplating a move’ to Bahrain

Someone close to Prince Andrew publicly confirmed that Andrew and Sarah Ferguson would not attend “royal Christmas” at Sandringham this year. The Yorks were invited to Sandringham, but then Andrew’s involvement with a Chinese spy was outed last week and all hell broke loose. The alleged spy had a wide variety of contacts within the British establishment, which is probably why everyone seems comfortable making this all about Andrew and HIS bad judgment alone. On Thursday, King Charles will apparently host the annual pre-Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace, and the Sun claims that Andrew still intends to come to that event, because it’s a “family occasion,” even if it would look bad if he was photographed pulling into BP. Meanwhile, sources close to Andrew are playing a “poor pitiful Andrew” card and suggesting that the Windsors won’t have a credibly accused rapist to kick around for much longer. Andrew might just pick up and move to Bahrain!

The Daily Beast can reveal that Prince Andrew is eyeing a move to Bahrain and could “do a Harry” and leave the country after being effectively kicked out of the royal family all over again due to his links to an alleged Chinese spy.

Andrew is now likely to spend [Christmas Day] effectively in hiding at his home, Royal Lodge, where the former helicopter pilot has taken to projecting flight tracking apps on the walls. His ex-wife and children are also reportedly not attending Sandringham festivities so they may join him. Sarah likened herself in an interview this weekend as a “carer” to Andrew, whom she described, sympathetically, as a “sad man.”

However, it could be Andrew’s last Christmas in the U.K. The Daily Beast has been told by two friends of Andrew, who claim that he has been unfairly portrayed in the unfolding spying scandal, that he is now “sick and tired of being painted as a pariah” and is “seriously contemplating a move to the United Arab Emirates or Bahrain.”

He has wealthy if sometimes dubious supporters in both jurisdictions, but especially in the autocratic monarchy of Bahrain, where he has been a regular visitor for decades and has been feted by King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa.

One friend of Andrew’s who has known him and his wife for decades told The Daily Beast: “The whole thing stinks to high heaven. You’d think Andrew had been passing state secrets to the man. Andrew is sick and tired of being painted as a pariah in the British media and is seriously contemplating a move to the United Arab Emirates of Bahrain. None of us would blame him if he decided to do a Harry and leave. He can’t do anything here anymore, he can’t leave the house, he can’t do any business, and now he is apparently Kim Philby.”

Another friend said: “Andrew has a vast array of contacts in the Middle East and could be leading a meaningful life there. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he thought enough was enough after this latest stich-up by the establishment.”

When asked if they were suggesting Andrew’s relationship with the alleged spy—named on Monday as Yang Tengbo—had been misrepresented by the security services to harm Andrew’s reputation, the friend said: “Andrew doesn’t have any power. He was entirely open about Yang’s involvement with Pitch@Palace. This guy was meeting prime ministers and god knows who else. And yet mysteriously it’s his relationship with Andrew that matters? Come on.”

[From The Daily Beast]

It’s a situation where, sadly, Andrew and his friends are making some decent points but no one will pay attention because Andrew is so contemptible and compromised. Yes, Andrew was super-close to this spy and Andrew provided all kinds of access. But… other people were involved with the spy as well, and it’s not like Andrew knows the launch codes. Andrew is being forced to take the fall for a much bigger situation which involves much more powerful people. You could even argue that it’s somewhat similar to the Jeffrey Epstein situation – while Andrew has been credibly accused of all kinds of seedy, sleazy and criminal things with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his involvement ended up protecting much more powerful people who were also involved with Epstein and Maxwell. King Charles is also using this spy drama to make his final push to get Andrew out of Royal Lodge.

As for Andrew’s dream of moving to Bahrain and starting over… I honestly don’t care, but it would shake things up a bit. It would be interesting from a gossip standpoint if Andrew went into self-imposed exile, living a life of luxury in Bahrain and making whatever deals he could. Would Fergie go with him?

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Instar and Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

50 Responses to “Prince Andrew is apparently ‘seriously contemplating a move’ to Bahrain”

  1. Tulipworthy says:

    I am curious if he leaves the Royal family and country, is he really any use to other nations? He had no power or influence.

    • TN Democrat says:

      He is a sleazy little flunky who does not have influence, but probably has dossiers on dozens of important people in the UK because of his place in the royal family and abroad because of his ties to Epstein and role as a UK trade envoy. Andrew has been served to the press on a platter by his brother for decades. Andrew can burn the whole thing down and won’t attempt to be fair and restrained (like Harry was in Spare) when he does.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      I’m guessing Bahrain is being floated because their extradition laws must be favourable to Andrew…

      • Mayp says:

        I’m guessing they’re floating Bahrain because there’s a long standing close relationship between the ruler of Bahrain, the (old) Queen and the Yorks. He was always said to have been very close to the Queen and I think he’s the one that threw that big horse party for one of her birthdays. A party at which Beatrice and Eugenie were seated next to him and the Queen. It was also reported that he paid for Eugenie’s pre-wedding bash.

        It may be as simple as an old, dear friend of the Queen wanting to help out poor old Andrew, so beloved (and protected) by his dear friend ol’ Betty. He has the money to do it and I’m sure thinks nothing of Andrew’s transgressions. When it came out that all of a sudden Andrew had the money to pay for the upkeep of Royal Lodge, my first thought was…. Bahrain.

  2. BayTampaBay says:

    “Would Fergie go with him?”

    Of course she would!

  3. sevenblue says:

    Who is gonna pay his security bills there? We know the type of security BRF needs is very expensive. I doubt Charles agree to pay, when he isn’t under his control. His “friends” wouldn’t do that favor for an unforeseeable period either. He is crying about media, but they leave him alone most of the time. We don’t hear any leaks, gossips about him from royal sources because the family protects him. No journalist writes about making him walk naked and throwing sh-t at him. No one is really throwing him under the bus, he was talking to the spy willingly, discussing how to enter to the palaces discreetly. He just doesn’t have the same media protection as the other people involved in this.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    I’d be surprised if he leaves the UK.

  5. LadyE says:

    On the spying issue, Prince Andrew is not only making valid points, but the real truth is that had he randomly shunned this person, he would not have been doing his “Royal” job. The entire point, such that there is one, of the RF is precisely this- to wine and dine, dazzle, and generally make people identified by the BRITISH GOVERNMENT as important feel like they’re in the special “Royal” club. That’s literally the only real value they have to the UK. Here, this “spy” was meeting with Ministers, with No 10 officials, of course the Royal family, and Andrew, are supposed to play along and open the palace doors. Why would Andrew go rogue and start objecting to someone fully embraced by the UK power establishment? On what basis would he do so? None. I can’t stand Andrew. But, on this issue, it’s a massive failure of British intelligence that actually endangered the RF, not the other way around.

    • Eurydice says:

      I suppose the question here is kind of chicken and egg. Who met with this alleged spy first? Did the government ask Andrew to meet with him or did Andrew introduce him to the government officials? This alleged spy was a business partner of Andrew’s, so how did that happen?

      And after Andrew was stripped of all his patronages and removed as a “working royal,” would he even have the job of entertaining on behalf of the government? We haven’t seen any evidence of that and it doesn’t agree with Andrew’s story that he’s been kicking around Windsor with nothing to do.

      • LadyE says:

        I do a lot of work on the Uyghur issue and work fairly closely with UK-based individuals who work on China generally. The issue of Chinese spies having infiltrated the UK is not a Royal scandal. It’s a massive issue that has serious human rights implications not just for Uyghurs, but activists/dissidents/residents of Hong Kong and Tibet to name just a few. Starmer is currently on quite the charm offensive with China and of course the UK’s colonial history makes the relationship complicated for the government to manage. As much as I dislike Andrew, this is not his scandal and his part in it is not even close to the actual real serious security issues the UK has failed in dealing with.

    • Becks1 says:

      @LadyE thanks for this additional context, thats interesting. So it seems like a general security fail, not something specific to Andrew (for once).

  6. NoHope says:

    It’s interesting thing to ponder in the abstract: would one thrive in a new climate in a repressive culture, while living in luxury? Or would the new home in exile become an echo chamber of regrettable deeds that led him there?

    One of the weirder things to me about the British is that they on the one hand, truly love their country and customs as the best, but yet at the same time, reason the whole world speaks English is because they kept popping off the island to colonize other places.

    So then: happy new chapter or magnified misery?

    • Chaine says:

      IMO he wants back the aspect of his very very former life where everyone licked his boots because he was the “spare.” Maybe he thinks that Bahrain is a country where people are less likely to know or care about his scandals and more likely to be subservient and flatter him as he believes he is due as a prince.

    • Unblinkered says:

      Magnified misery, I’d say.
      Unless he got a licence to dig for oil, in which case he might have the last laugh.

  7. Mightymolly says:

    I wanted to make a joke about the US welcoming him with the open arms of the law, but let’s face it he’d be pardoned and given an apartment at Mara Lago. Enjoy Bahrain paedo!

  8. Anonymous says:

    He should consider Qatar. A nation with a hereditary monarchy, reputation for hosting shady people, wining and dining the Hamas leadership in the royal palace, slave labour, worst human rights regarding women, and overflowing money. A perfect haven for the criminal.

  9. Jais says:

    Idk, I can’t really see him going? But who’s to say he would give up Royal Lodge? Maybe he’s just let Fergie and his daughters stay there if he’s in Bahrain. As long as it’s paid for? I’m not saying they want to live there but I just don’t see him giving it up.

  10. Elizabeth K. Mahon says:

    Bahrain? What happened to Abu Dhabi? Did they say ‘oh hello, no!”? We all now that he’s never leaving the UK not after fighting so hard to keep Royal Lodge. Although I’m sure that Huevo would love it if Uncle Andy moves so that he could have Royal Lodge.

  11. Tessa says:

    They are not “the Yorks” strictly speaking they have not been married since 1996. He probably would be more vulnerable outside the UK. The FBI probably still wants him for questioning.

    • Chaine says:

      She is still titled Duchess of York, though, so I guess until he gets married again, they are the Yorks.

      • Tessa says:

        It’s like Diana and Charles. She was given post divorce title dian a princess of Wales but they were not the Wales anymore. Ferg ie and Andrew are divorced but he has the post divorce title.

    • Roo says:

      Not the FBI under Donald Trump and Kash Patel. 😑

  12. Tessa says:

    Trouble is Charles is not all that squeaky clean. Interestingly, a Christmas card sent by Charles to savile showed up on ebay and got some media attention.

  13. Tessa says:

    Is he going to remarry Fergie. For legal purposes perhaps.

  14. Asantewaa says:

    Andrew is being scapegoated to cover up for two Ex Prime ministers, a Chancellor of the Exchequer and a whole host of important people with access to sensitive info. This info apparently ha been known since 2021. Typically there is kit There is kit bargaining going on to achieve an agenda; Royal Lodge included. What a nasty family/ media. Charles collected money from dodgy men from Qatar in fortnum and Mason carrier bags. He collected money from Osama Bin Laden’s brother a year after 911. I can’t believe I am defending Andrew! There is probably another big royal scandal being covered up in the process. How would Andrew know who a spy is Hmm?

    • Eurydice says:

      This info was also reported to Charles in 2021. I’m not going to defend Andrew because he has a history of dodgy relationships and he gravitates to whomever can give him money regardless of who that person might be.

    • Eos says:

      “Andrew is being scapegoated to cover up…”
      Where was MI6 when this alleged spy was cozying up to the ministers el al?

      I’ve also always found it incredulous that Andrew’s association with Epstein was never flagged and stopped by the gov’t given Epstein’s sex trafficking and criminal activity dated back to 2006. The gov’t, the media, the palace handlers & Charles must have known. All were complicit.

  15. Anonymous says:

    Hypothetically, If he does leave, I’m curious who becomes the new family scapegoat. This family doesn’t know how to function without having someone to throw under the bus to cover up their own actions. Harry left, Andrew was the natural next one because of his past. If he leaves, who is next in line? I mean, obviously the press will still go on about H&M, and still try to use Andrew too, but they would need someone still in the fold to easily throw to the wolves.

  16. Murphy says:

    …his brother Prince Edward is literally in Bahrain meeting with the Crown Prince today

  17. Sass says:

    Of course he is considering it. There is no extradition in Bahrain. Piece of shit.

  18. SarahCS says:

    he is now “sick and tired of being painted as a pariah”

    Isn’t that the actual job of the spare these days? Be a useful distraction to cover for your sibling in any way required. It helps that Andrew has no morals and a huge ego.

  19. Mooney says:

    He should consider Qatar, with its overflowing money, abysmal human rights records regarding women and slaves, and a history of sheltering shady people, it’s a perfect haven for the pedo.

  20. Lady Digby says:

    Today’s article in Inewspaper makes the case that tax funded royals owe public transparency
    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/the-royals-owe-the-public-transparency-right-now-3435330

  21. Tis True, Tis True says:

    Won’t happen, but Andrew has the chance to do the funniest thing and show up in LA for Christmas. One of those slugs that’s always trashing H&M would be glad to invite him (and Fergie!), right? Charles would be enraged and Harry furious. Wins all around!

    This would actually be terrible, of course. But I can dream.

  22. LionHeartGal says:

    Oh Andrew, don’t threaten us with a good time. Boy bye 👋

  23. FancyPants says:

    Don’t countries in that part of the world have really strict “behavior” laws? Like if Andrew got caught with a 17-yr-old there they might actually execute him? Doesn’t seem like a safe move for someone with his particular proclivities.

  24. phlyfiremama says:

    I’m just going to go ahead and guess Bahrain doesn’t have extradition treaties in place with European countries/the UK. 🤣🤣🤣

  25. QuiteContrary says:

    Pro-tip for Pedrew: If you don’t want to be a convenient fall guy, don’t do despicable things.

  26. Brynne says:

    While most of the royals don’t have direct political power, that’s not the same thing as having no influence. They privately lobby the government all the time for policies and exemptions (especially with taxes) to benefit themselves and their cronies. We’ve seen this with their real estate dealings and their various duchies.

    Andrew may not be passing state secrets (as if he would be trusted with any) but the picture that’s emerging is that not only is he facilitating access and providing cover for suspicious foreign agents to the ruling elites in the UK, but that his charitable foundations and perhaps royal trusts are likely being used to launder money for international criminals, with him taking a cut for himself. Andrew and Fergie have spent decades cozying up to slimy money anytime they run into financial trouble.

    And wouldn’t be the only one to do so—it wasn’t that long ago that Charles himself was directly implicated in accepting literal bags of cash (2.5 million pounds) from Saudi figures (including members of the Bin Laden family) that went to the Prince of Wales Charitable Fund.

  27. SamuelWhiskers says:

    K bye.

    • Jojo says:

      Exactly. Who cares where Andrew goes anymore.

      Also this is clearly another Kingly move to try to oust him from his nice big house because the heir wants to use it, along with Kate, as their conveniently separate winged homes. Just as Andrew and Fergie lived discretely together but apart for years.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment