Margaret Qualley got year-long acne from The Substance’s face prosthetics

As I’ve mentioned in several posts now, I saw The Substance over the holidays and I loathed it. While I thought it was an interesting concept and *some* of the body horror was well-executed, they really drove the whole story off of a f–king cliff for the last hour. It was trying to be high-minded about the toxic messages of worshipping youth and beauty, but they also wanted to exploit youth and beauty too. Anyway, Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley did the best they could with the material they were given, and both actresses are getting nominations all over the place. Demi has been campaigning more than Margaret, but Margaret has just introduced a “struggle narrative” to her campaign. Apparently, because of all of the facial prosthetics, she had a severe breakout which affected her for about a year.

In a recent interview on the “Happy Sad Confused” podcast, Margaret Qualley said it took “a year” for her skin to recover from the irritation caused by the face prosthetics used in “The Substance.” The damage was so bad that director Coralie Fargeat had to frame out her face in certain shots.

“At the end, when they’re shooting up my skirt in the beginning credits, and it’s like the palm trees all around and they have all these long lenses from the bottom, that’s just because my face was so f–ked up,” Qualley said. “They couldn’t shoot my face anymore.”

The acne from the prosthetics lasted long after “The Substance” wrapped and persisted as she began shooting her next film, “Kinds of Kindness,” in which she played four characters: Vivian, Martha, Rebecca and Ruth. Luckily, the acne played to her benefit in the Yorgos Lanthimos drama.

“So, you know the character that has all that acne? That was just my acne from the prosthetics,” Qualley said. “And I was like, ‘Oh this is kind of perfect. I’m playing all these different characters. For one of them, we’ll use all my crazy prosthetic acne.’ It took me probably a year to recover physically from all of it.”

[From Variety]

This reminded me of Scarlett Johansson talking about how all of the Marvel actors get rashes from their superhero suits and they basically have dermatologists on stand-by. Honestly, as someone who gets a rash at the drop of a hat, Margaret’s story is its own horror story. She should sue! Seriously, her skin’s reaction to those janky prosthetics affected her work! Does this make you want to vote for her in the supporting category?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

6 Responses to “Margaret Qualley got year-long acne from The Substance’s face prosthetics”

  1. Jason says:

    She should sue?? 🤣 🤣 🤣 and it was a FANTASTIC MOVIE.

  2. Grant says:

    I liked the Substance but I agree, it went off the rails a little in the third act. Margaret was fabulous though. She’s on the cusp of an Oscar nomination in the incredibly stacked Supporting Actress category; I hope she snags a nom!

  3. Sumodo1 says:

    The Substance is my fave new movie. Demi should win the Oscar for female lead actor.

  4. sevenblue says:

    As much as some people hated it, the director / writer Coralie Fargeat had to fight for the third act “Monster ElisaSue”. I definitely liked it, but I can see it would be too much for some people. There is a behind the scenes video released for the movie on youtube. It is phenomenal how detailed Coralie created the story and how little effects she used. She said she tried to create the characters physically instead of using editing, special effects, so the actors can fully embrace the characters in the scene. I can’t imagine what Demi had to endure in those prosthetics most of the movie.

  5. Sandra says:

    I’m 71 and still have to avoid lotions or makeup with ANY oil in them. I still get acne. It’s tough to find the right products that are oil-free but make my “mature” skin feel moisturized. I often think about all that makeup that actors are slathered with and wonder how many of them break out because of it…

  6. HezUrBetz says:

    Longtime lurker here, partner of a special effects makeup artist that feels compelled
    to speak before people automatically pile up on the poor IATSE members who did her makeup. I call serious bs on this. Almost every time an actor has pulled this it’s been debunked. Everything would’ve been done by her makeup artists to protect her skin from breakout. There is an involved process in both applying & removing prosthetics from the skin. Even severe allergic reactions to the foam latex or silicone (like John Rhys-Davies in Lord of the Rings for example) start healing as soon as you stop filming. And are not the fault of the makeup artist. Artists HATE when actors try to ride the struggle bus to nominations by dissing their work or implying they weren’t professional enough to keep them from harm. She’s trying to get nominations but she’s screwing with people’s careers here. Not cool.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment