Drake sued UMG for defamation over Kendrick Lamar’s beef-winning diss songs

As we discussed this week, Drake decided to withdraw his legal petitions against UMG (Universal Music Group) and Spotify. He sent the notices last fall, basically accusing UMG and Spotify of artificially inflating Kendrick Lamar’s numbers for Kendrick’s diss songs against Drake in the spring of 2024. Drake’s argument was convoluted – he basically argued that UMG and Spotify “helped” Kendrick game the system, and “Not Like Us” wouldn’t have been an organic song of the year on its own, it needed UMG and Spotify to push the song down people’s throats. Which wasn’t the way it actually went down, at all. In any case, Drake and Spotify walked away from that, but UMG was basically like… let’s see what this dumbass does next. They didn’t have to wait very long – Drake has now sued UMG for defamation for ALLOWING Kendrick to talk sh-t in “Not Like Us.”

Drake is not backing down in the war against his own label, in fact he’s now upped the ante by suing Universal Music Group for spreading the “false and malicious narrative” he’s a pedophile … TMZ Hip Hop has learned.

Drake filed the defamation case Wednesday morning in federal court in NYC … ripping UMG for releasing and promoting Kendrick Lamar’s vicious diss track, “Not Like Us.” In the docs, obtained by TMZ Hip Hop, Drake says UMG knew full well Kendrick’s lyrics, and images in the music video, referring to Drake as a pedophile were false and dangerous. In the suit he calls Kendrick’s hit — filled with “inflammatory and shocking allegations”– was a “gold mine” for UMG … and he says they had an ulterior financial motive in promoting it.

Drake claims his label was doing everything it could to pump up “Not Like Us” because it knew it would devalue his music and brand … and, therefore, give UMG leverage in future contract negotiations with Drake. Keep in mind, Drake’s last UMG contract, signed in 2022, was a blockbuster deal worth a reported $400 million!

Drake says he’s got bot receipts to show just how far the label went to turn Kendrick’s song into an anthem. According to the suit, UMG paid a third party to use bots to increase the song’s streams by at least 30 million — and engaged in a “pay for play” scheme with at least one radio promoter. He claims UMG attached the label “chart-topper” to “Not Like Us,” despite knowing that title was based on fraudulent data.

It’s also clear Drake’s very mindful of what’s going down in New Orleans next month — in the suit, he claims UMG was in on getting Kendrick the Super Bowl Halftime gig … so, the song could be performed on that massive stage, which he calls “one of the most significant (and viewed) cultural events of the year.” Ya gotta wonder — will the NFL and FOX, which is airing the Super Bowl, allow Kendrick to use the pedophile lyrics when he performs??

Interestingly, Drake isn’t going directly after Kendrick in the suit — in fact, he says, “This lawsuit is not about the artist who created ‘Not Like Us.’ It is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize” the song which it knew contained false claims.

A spokesperson for Universal Music Group tells TMZ … “Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist — let alone Drake — is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success. Throughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth ‘rap battles’ to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist’s creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist’s music.

“We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual. At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more that write a song.”

[From TMZ]

If I’m being honest, I think there’s a small sliver of truth to the idea that UMG wasn’t mad that Drake was being taken down a few pegs because that meant Drake couldn’t negotiate another hugely lucrative deal. But that’s the only part of Drake’s lawsuit which has any grounding in reality – the rest of it is Drake’s delusional cope. This is one of the most important parts of UMG’s response: “Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth ‘rap battles’… He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist’s creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist’s music.” That’s it in a nutshell – Drake wants to play victim and act like UMG should have been judicious in how they disseminated Kendrick’s songs, and yet UMG did the right thing by simply letting the beef play out without censoring anyone.

As for defamation… Drake said that Kendrick’s partner Whitney was cheating on him and that Kendrick’s son Enoch wasn’t biologically his. Drake said that Kendrick physically abused Whitney. Drake also said that Kendrick was molested. All of those lyrics were lies, and UMG “allowed” Drake to release that music too. Kendrick hasn’t gone around, suing people over it. Kendrick just churned out some of the best disses ever in response to Drake’s lies.

There’s so much stuff in Drake’s lawsuit, but something which is getting a lot of attention is that he name-checked a lot of YouTube reactor channels. Before last year, I never watched music reactors, but I got into several YouTubers because of the Drake-Kendrick beef. Those people are just doing it because they love the music, the gossip and the drama. They weren’t being PAID to promote Kendrick. Most of those people were Drake fans! I wanted to post No Life Shaq’s reaction to being name-checked in Drake’s lawsuit because I was laughing my ass off, especially when he brought his son out to call Drake a snitch. NSFW for language. Everything he says here is the truth. I think I’ll also include a reaction compilation for “Not Like Us.”

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Drake’s IG.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

18 Responses to “Drake sued UMG for defamation over Kendrick Lamar’s beef-winning diss songs”

  1. sevenblue says:

    He is truly Canadian Karen 😭😭 For the reactors, I assumed it was Kendrick who let the reactors monetize their reactions. Kendrick is an independent artist, he has that power, right? I remember, the reactors were thanking Kendrick for it, because it meant they could make money from the views.

    I have read some guesses that Drake is doing all that to scare Kendrick off from playing the song on Superbowl. Creating as much legal trouble as possible, so that the NFL or the producers of the show will ask Kendrick not to play it, since they don’t wanna get sued. Otherwise, these lawsuits don’t make any sense.

    • AD says:

      Well the “UMG was in on getting Kendrick the Super Bowl Halftime gig … so, the song could be performed on that massive stage,”

      so, the song could be performed …This calls for the operation of the mind. It is a supposition that will go nowhere.

      • sevenblue says:

        @AD, I was talking about Superbowl’s producers. UMG is no doubt backing Kendrick in whatever he chooses. Maybe, Drake is calculating, the Superbowl producers wouldn’t want to get in legal trouble in the future if they let Kendrick play the song.

  2. Boxy Lady says:

    This punk ass. This is not how the rap diss track game works! LOL

    I bet if Kendrick does Not Like Us at the Superbowl, he won’t have to say the pedophile parts of the song. The crowd would say those lyrics for him LOL.

  3. Jan says:

    The lowest part of this lawsuit, is Drake claiming that “not like us” is antisemitic.

    • Bumblebee says:

      Which doesn’t make any sense, because Kendrick called him a colonizer. Any American judge and jury will immediately know that has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with skin color.

  4. Jais says:

    I guess drake’s lawyers are happy to be getting paid? But is there no one else around him to say just let it go? I can’t imagine this case going anywhere but maybe I’m wrong idk. But where does drake go from here after this? Who is going to take him seriously ?

    • Nanea says:

      Mr Aubrey Graham will probably go back to that mall-like home on Park Lane Circle in Toronto.

      Oh sorry, that monstrosity of a building that he calls The Embassy.
      /-s

  5. Inge says:

    This is the guy who as a 30ish year old started texting a 14yr old Millie Bobby Brown right?

    He’s such a pathetic loset

    • sevenblue says:

      Don’t forget, he was advising her about boys. It is grooming 101. I am so happy Millie made that relationship public, so Drake had to back off because of the public reaction. Otherwise, I am sure we would see them going on a public date as soon as Millie turned 18. He did the same thing with some model girl, but she wasn’t as famous as Millie, so he got his public date when she was 18 without much public backlash.

      • Michael says:

        He did the exact same thing with Hailey Bieber. He was her “friend” and as soon as she turned 18 they went on a “date” and she was seen wearing his chain. Not to mention Kylie Jenner and Billie Eilish and probably a dozen other less famous underage girls. He does NOT want this in court. Discovery alone would bury him

      • sevenblue says:

        @Michael, wow no doubt, he was so sure of himself going after a child, since he did it multiple times and nobody said anything. What a perv! I am sure Kendrick isn’t angel either, but I am so happy he let all Drake’s dirty laundry out there.

  6. Cj says:

    First heard about him being a little punk back when he left degrassi (wheelchair Jimmy!) and launched as drake and immediately dropped all his costars including a friend of friend because degrassi wasn’t cool enough now he was a rapper. An absolute little gobsh*te and I hope he’s made the laughing stock of rappers from now until the year 3000. Heck, I hope McBusted rerelease that song just to NameDrop him being a little punk.

  7. Kitten says:

    Another predictable self-own from this clown. What a fucking loser.

    Also, we need to re-examine these defamation slap suits because I foresee Trump and his billionaire pals using this kind of tactic to silence and intimidate anyone who says something mean about him. I mean the dude already leveled a lawsuit at a pollster because he didn’t like her poll results…

  8. ML says:

    Who does Drake surround himself with? Hiring lawyers to bite the hand that feeds you doesn’t scream tough or knowing how to take an L. Does he really think this will help his image?

  9. seaflower says:

    Whiny punk ass can dish it out, but can’t take it back.

  10. Visa Diva says:

    Drake learning about the Striesand effect on real time is fantastic.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment