The Daily Mail did a comprehensive ‘tally’ of Duchess Meghan’s Invictus wardrobe

I’m sure the British tabloids are in full meltdown because of the Duchess of Sussex’s big “As Ever” announcement last night, but it’s worth noting that they’ve been utterly scandalized over everything Meghan has done or said for nine years now. One of their favorite “scandals” is “the price of Meghan’s jewelry and clothing.” Nevermind that Meghan has several high-end favorites which she tends to wear constantly, and she’s had those pieces for years. It doesn’t matter – those are computed into the Mail’s comprehensive tally of her wardrobe. It also doesn’t matter to the Mail that Meghan buys her own clothes & jewelry and absolutely none of it is their business.

She may have only attended three days of the 2025 Invictus Games – but Meghan Markle certainly made a statement when it came to her extravagant (yet somewhat understated) fashion choices this year. During her short stint in British Colombia last week, the Duchess of Sussex, 43, managed to wear £270,000 of designer clothing and jewellery.

In fact, the cheapest outfit Meghan wore to the Invictus Games, which drew to a close last night, still cost an eye-watering £22,000 – and included a pair of £948 designer leather boots.

On the other end of the spectrum, the Duchess’ priciest outfit, which she wore to a ‘storytime’ event for children of athletes, was worth £254,777 – with the mother-of-two’s jewellery collection alone totting up to a quarter of a million.

For her 10 appearances at the Games, Meghan turned to some of her go-to designers – with the Duchess opting to wear Ralph Lauren on three occasions and Valentino twice.

But while Meghan’s 2025 Invictus Games wardrobe £30,000 cheaper than her 2023 one, the Duchess – who famously claimed she had to ‘tone down’ her colourful outfits while she was a working royal – opted for much more muted tones than previous years.

[From The Daily Mail]

You can go to the Mail to see the outfit breakdowns if you care. They really tallied up the cost of every piece of jewelry… which they never do with the Princess of Wales. Granted, Meghan has always worn more jewelry than Kate, and Meghan has always worn more of her own pieces. The real “cost” of Meghan’s Invictus clothes – which, again, she bought herself – is closer to $10,000, not counting the Cartier watch and her engagement ring and all of the jewelry pieces she’s had for years. The Mail is not slick whatsoever.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images, Meghan’s IG.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

49 Responses to “The Daily Mail did a comprehensive ‘tally’ of Duchess Meghan’s Invictus wardrobe”

  1. Of for goodness sake Meg is a private citizen and she can buy whatever and wear what’s he wants. She isn’t funded by taxpayers.

    • Swaz says:

      Exactly 👍 and they can’t really write about THE WINDSORS PANHANDLING THE TAXPAYERS ALTHOUGH BETWEEN JULY AND SEPTEMBER LAST YEAR THE UK ECONOMY HAD ZERO GROWTH 😳😳

    • Caitlin says:

      Exactly, Susan. Ironically, Kate who is a drain on UK taxpayers is routinely praised for her clothes and recently referred to as a fashion icon. FFS!!!

    • TheFarmer'sWife says:

      Duchess Meghan has a job, several actually. What have Keen and Wank done lately, unless being professional grifters always on tax payer funded vacation is considered work.

    • Barbara Allen says:

      Meghan is also a major influencer and what she wear sells quickly. I wonder how many of the fashions she wore at the Games were given to her so that she would appear publicly in them.

    • Debbie says:

      I know it’s not the reaction the Mail was seeking but a review of Meghan’s outfits during the 2025 winter Invictus just made me drool like Homer Simpson eating donuts. Oh, my God, they’re gorgeous.

    • Olivia says:

      It brings to mind the old Jim Crow era tradition of employers micromanaging everything in their employees’ lives, including making sure their clothes were humble enough. But, of course, that’s probably just a coincidence. 😉

  2. somebody says:

    More lies to whip up hate for no reason. Do they do this to any other private citizens?

  3. Chantale says:

    I do not care what the daily fail said, good, bad and indifferent about Meghan Prince Harry and anyone for that matter. I am not giving them clicks. It has been going one since 2019. I am very selective when it comes to that media over there.

    • Shoegirl77 says:

      They’re never getting clicks from me. I refuse to push traffic for them by engaging. As I frequently say about the Fail and the Scum, I don’t read anything from either of them for the same reason I don’t eat from the toilet.

  4. TN Democrat says:

    Lort. Meghan is a private citizen and not on the dole like Keener. Why doesn’t the media ever point out the scam involved in Keener buying identical coatdresses over and over and the reason for that (resale)? Everything keener has access to should be audited because her grifter parents lifestyle been funded somehow. Harry and Meghan left 5 years ago. Is the media ever going to focus on the grifting duds left behind?

    • Silver says:

      Wow! One of these posts I read and think ‘How did I miss that?’. The coat-dress thing is funding the monstrous middletons!

  5. Dee(2) says:

    I know that their goal isn’t to make sense, but to cause outrage but why would you include the cost of jewelry that she owns and has worn numerous times in the price of her outfit? Do you include the cost of your car for your vacation? Oh that trip to Disney cost us $50,000, because I drove my $44,000 car to Florida.

    Beyond that why is this their business? She bought this with HER money, not taxpayers. Why aren’t you tallying how much private jet flights to Mystique and weekly rentals cost? This constant pocket watching of Meghan but really all black wealthy women is so annoying.

  6. Nanea says:

    Defining the Fail is easy: racist, misogynistic — or, in Meghan’s case, misogynoir — envious, jealous liars, trying to distract people from their failure of investigating the Left-Behind royals, their misuse of funds, their corruption, their shady dealings and the way they’re exempt from so many laws.

    They are the Derangers in Chief.

  7. Giddy says:

    My reaction to this idiocy reminds me of one of my favorite lines from The Big Lebowski…”Shut the f*ck up Donnie!” That’s what I would love to say to the DM, their tame writers, the owner, the editor, everyone who thinks this is newsworthy or fair. Just shut the f’ck up! The British public doesn’t pay for Meghan’s clothes, it’s absolutely none of their business. Shut up! Go away! Get lost! Fu*k off!

  8. sevenblue says:

    Oh no, a rich woman is wearing expensive clothing? Call the cops! They miss her so much now that they can’t lie about taxpayers paying for all these.

  9. Louise177 says:

    It’s laughable that they act like everything is brand new when a lot is years old. I can’t get over that British tabloids acts like Meghan has this huge, expensive jewelry collection when it’s just her wedding rings and watches that are really expensive. Bracelets, earrings, etc can be higher end but most aren’t over a couple thousand.

  10. aquarius64 says:

    The press Derangers that is the BM are upset after all their bullying over the years hasn’t force Meghan to live on government assistance,and still can afford nice things and live in an affluent neighborhood with her royal husband and royal children. They’re also mad she can enter business ventures on her own with successes despite their smears.

  11. wolfmamma says:

    I looked at the Fail yesterday for a minute

    It’s striking how much worse it is than ever before

    No truth, no joy, nothing worth reading. It’s always been bad but now it’s really unreadable for any reason

    And their big ad for MAGA land is revolting

    • Deborah1 says:

      I totally agree. I used to read the print edition years ago mainly for its “human interest” stories. Now everything they publish has a vile slant to it and it’s obvious they have an agenda to manipulate and stir up their readers. Since they started with a subscription model it’s become even worse. The most hateful articles are usually subscription-only. I refuse to give them a cent but I can tell how hateful they are by the readers’ comments. Their fawning over MAGA in the USA and the ultra far-right in Britain is nauseating. There are only two British newspapers which publish quality articles with a centre-left political slant – The Guardian and The Independent. The Times is centre-right but its journalism is also (usually) top quality, even if it is owned by Rupert Murdoch. The Daily Mail is a bellweather for the worst of humanity nowadays.

  12. Lili says:

    Well Good for her she is wearing some good clothes because the flip side they are broke and just begging to come back, to be even more broke accepting William grudging handouts whilst doing the bulk of the work without proper credit

  13. Jais says:

    Boo hoo. Woman wears jewelry she bought for herself. And highlights small women-owned businesses as she did with that new joy bracelet from ValenciaKey but I’m guessing they skipped that part.

  14. Tessa says:

    The click bait continues. Meghan is entitled to spend her money on clothes.

  15. Louise says:

    Oh for the love. They just can’t get anything right, can they? It’s COLUMBIA. British COLUMBIA. Colombia is the last one you misspelled.

  16. ThatGirlThere says:

    They won’t ever admit it but Meghan is the star of the royal family. She’s beautiful, gracious, graceful and had impeccable taste. She’s everything they’ve always wanted and they let her and her fabulous husband get away. I love that for them and for us because now they don’t be stifled by fake protocols and bullshit.

    And there is no price tally for that.

  17. Mina_Esq says:

    Oh for the love of…even us mere peasants can afford to wear Ralph Lauren and Veronica Beard.

  18. Over it says:

    I don’t care if Meghan wore diamond encrusted panties on the outside of her pants . I would be fine with it because she paid for them out of her own pocket. So the British media can just f all the way off with Their bs

  19. lanne says:

    Apparently she buys a new wedding and engagement ring every time she sets foot outside of her house. And her clothing goes into the trash can when she gets home so she can buy her clothes anew the next time.

    At least Meghan can ignore this shit, unlike the royals who are bound to dance to these idiots tunes.

  20. Lady Digby says:

    The Fail are just foul and their online version does frequent daily articles on Meg because of click bait. Comments can be as high as 3k. They are NEVER going to cover Meg and Harry fairly because they are just a nasty rag who make their money by being trolls. It’s ironic that if Meg and Harry had chosen to live in a cave as Trappist Monks then the Fail wouldn’t be making any money off criticising them. They would be snarking more about W and K ‘s holiday with C.Middy in Mystique when they should be working. The Fail does support the monarchy and do tweak Will’s nose occasionally but he’ll never get sustained scrutiny.

  21. Amy Bee says:

    Meghan mostly wore repeats so to inflate the cost the DM added the rumoured cost of her engagement ring. Considering Meghan pays for her own clothes it doesn’t matter how much her clothes cost.

  22. Hypocrisy says:

    Price tagging Meghan like this when she pays her own expenses is disgusting and beyond racist, I’m just glad Meghan can afford to buy whatever in the hell she wants no matter how much it costs. As Ever, Meghan wins and the fails desperation is showing.

  23. Lau says:

    If Kate was actually working, the derangers would be able to say “but, but, she doesn’t communicate about her clothes anymore !” as an excuse for this kind of behaviour.

  24. Nancy says:

    My current work ensemble with Watch and earrings comes in at $296.56. This does include my undies though. Shall I email the Daily Mail since they are so interested in pricing a private American citizen’s wardrobe?

  25. tamsin says:

    Glad she featured Canadian outer wear to perfection.

  26. Deborah1 says:

    It’s ludicrous that the Mail includes the cost of her Cartier Tank watch (it used to be Princess Diana’s), her engagement ring (given to her by Prince Harry) and the Cartier Love bracelet (also given to her by Prince Harry) in the total cost of her outfits on a daily basis during the Invictus Games. The cost of her ACTUAL CLOTHES are no more than the average fashion-conscious woman with a bit of money would be paying. If I wore my late mother’s diamond engagement ring on a daily basis, the cost of my outfits would shoot right up! Sheesh. 🙄

  27. Pinocchio Princess says:

    Meghan’s expensive self-funded wardrobe and bathrooms is no one’s business.

    They should be more concerned about the unemployed Waileses’ Mustique vacation. Now that the queen has passed, I wonder if uncle Gary has been invited to celebrate in Mustique and showing William the island’s beauties and personalized services.

  28. LaurenAPMT says:

    While I have no doubt the Royal Family forced Meghan to make wardrobe changes she didn’t agree with/shouldn’t have had to follow, I don’t remember ever really seeing her in tons of different-colored outfits, even before she got together with Harry? Pops of color here and there, but always a lot of black, navy, grey, and beige, which she’s known for.
    No shade intended at all, but I’m confused that she says she was told to “tone down” her wardrobe when it was never crazy to begin with.

  29. Lover says:

    I hope from now on Meghan spends significantly more than Kate on every single outfit so the subtext can be that Meghan is able to earn more spending money for herself from her own business ventures than Kate can sponge from the public purse.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment