Tina Brown: ‘With Love, Meghan’ is ‘unbelievably inauthentic’ & ‘a cultural fossil’

I read most of Tina Brown’s 2022 book, The Palace Papers, and it felt at times like she had gotten other royalists to ghostwrite certain sections. There was a schizophrenic quality to it, especially in the chapters about Prince William and Kate versus the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. In the years since The Palace Papers, Brown has maintained this general perspective on the two couples: William and Kate are unprepared for everything and William is sick with jealousy over his brother’s charisma, freedom and happiness; on the other side, Brown believes that Meghan is ghastly and that she’s manipulating poor, dumb, charismatic Harry. This is all background for Tina Brown latest attempt at royal commentary, obviously about Meghan’s Netflix show.

Tina Brown, the founding editor of The Daily Beast, has said that Meghan Markle’s much-derided new Netflix show is a “cultural fossil” and that her appearance on it was “unbelievably inauthentic.”

In a Substack chat with Janice Min, the founder of the Hollywood gossip newsletter The Ankler, Min joked that the show, With Love, Meghan, felt like it was filmed in a “mental institution for wealthy women” and that Meghan’s guests looked like they were in “a hostage situation.”

Brown said: “To me, I felt like it was a cultural fossil…She’s always brilliant behind the curve, Meghan. You know what I mean? This was like flashback to 2013 to the era of The Tig, her blog, which was sort of shout-outs for humanitarian causes and Diptyque candles…it’s almost as if she wanted to airbrush out everything that happened since and sort of go back to that moment in time.”

Min responded: “It’s a little HGTV 2012, right? It was like when Megyn Kelly left Fox News and came to NBC and did her daytime talk show, and she’s like, ‘You know what? This is who I really am. I love moms and I love to cook and talk about raising kids.’ And then that flames out and she gets paid her check, and she comes back to, ‘I’m here to embrace Donald Trump and kill my enemies.’ She tried on a persona. It didn’t work…this is very, as the kids would say, trad wife. I was very surprised.”

Brown replied, “It was just so unbelievably inauthentic. She’s still searching for that thing that makes her authentic…It should have been her sitting there saying, ‘Will someone for God’s sake, get me an effing project? I don’t have anything to do. I can’t hang on to staff. I’m at my wit’s end. I mean, it actually would’ve been refreshing to have seen a bit of that.”

Min responded, “I would watch that all day long.”

Brown said: “I just feel bad for her because it’s like, she just gets it wrong. When she announced it, suddenly there was the fire. So she then has to put it off. So she puts it off and what happens is like, oh, World War III is happening around her. We have everybody’s minds on Zelensky and Ukraine, and she’s standing there with her country basket full of chives or whatever.”

Min said: “It feels like it was filmed in a mental institution for wealthy women. It kind of had that lobotomized vibe.” Min said she expected that the couple would remain in the limelight forever, not least because Archie was going to be “the coolest royal” and the “fresh prince of Montecito.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Let’s talk about the “inauthentic” criticism, because I find that very British-coded. As in, that’s how so many British people (especially upper-class Brits) reacted to Meghan and Meghan’s race and Americanness. They were suspicious from the word go that this American actress smiled and wanted to do charity work and had any kind of work ethic. They found Meghan “inauthentic” simply because she is a Black, American woman with a sunny disposition, and because Meghan wasn’t desperate to “fit in” with their world and jump through their hoops. They’re even more upset these days because she took the better prince and they both refuse to “come to heel.”

The thing about “this is very HGTV 2012” is also sort of interesting to me because the way WLM is filmed and the sunniness of the host and the style IS very Obama-era, very “remember The Tig?” I hesitate to call it “retro” because that was just a decade ago, but it absolutely is the vibe. But I also think that’s fine? Like, there was a reason why that programming was so successful in its time, and I’m really pleased that Meghan is bringing it back. I’m tired of every cooking show being a “competition” these days. Just let me watch an attractive hostess with a pleasant voice cook & arrange flowers in a beautiful home. Anyway, Tina Brown has always had a bug up her ass about Meghan. If only Tina would turn her ire to the heir full-time.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Netflix.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

207 Responses to “Tina Brown: ‘With Love, Meghan’ is ‘unbelievably inauthentic’ & ‘a cultural fossil’”

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    God I just truly despise this woman.. funny she should talk about being inauthentic and a fossil a lot of self projection in that statement.

    • Alteya says:

      ^thus. inauthentic fossil tinab outed herself.

    • Lady Esther says:

      That was my first thought too – if anyone should know about cultural fossils, it’s Tina Brown, still trying to make a buck off of Diana and the RF any way she can! Any possible “innovation” she could have been responsible for in her field (and the New Yorker staff during her tenure I’m sure would have a different view) is long, long ago

    • PunkyMomma says:

      Yes! This! Tina Brown is still relevant? I think not.

      • Tessa says:

        Tina had one lunch with Diana, and said she was her “friend.” Some Friend. Her stories about Diana were very dubious.

    • Jais says:

      100% that was my first thought too! I had to stop and say wait is she actually talking about herself? The way she talks about Meghan comes across as things that could be applied to herself. She should know about going through staff….just saying. A cultural fossil clouting for relevancy by calling someone else a fossil. Yikes. And if she’s coming from the misogynistic perspective that poor unintelligent Harry was manipulated by Meghan, then idk what else there is to say? Antiquated dinosaurs are gonna dinosaur.

      • Tessa says:

        A woman trashing another woman that way. Tina is putting down all women with the misogynistic blather of the “domineering” woman. Harry only married her because he is “weak” say the derangers and Tina is one of them and trying to appeal to derangers.

    • Lizzie says:

      I don’t believe Tina Brown has ever met Meghan and sounds like a clown calling her inauthentic. What I call inauthentic is Tina Brown desperate to criticize WLM and scrambling for something vague after THR already used ‘unrelatable’. Poor old thing grasping at Megan’s coattails.

      • Lorelei says:

        These people, Tina included, are constantly talking out of both sides of their mouths. According to them, Harry is dumb and childlike with zero agency and follows Meghan around like a lovesick puppy dog. But ALSO Harry needs to go back to the UK and be a working royal again because he’s so fabulous at it, he’s the one with all of the charisma who was expected to be William’s “shadow king,” he’s great with people, especially on tours, and genuinely connects with people.

        Which is it? Is he a loser, or the monarchy’s salvation? Pick a lane, people.

    • somebody says:

      She could be referring to herself or the monarchy she is so into. Not Meghan. She does realize that ordinary people do still cook and entertain?

  2. Blogger says:

    The projection from Tina 🙄 you won’t get a Netflix series with that attitude! And I didn’t realise that Tina was global diplomating with Zelenskyy!

    As for Min, what an awful person. Hope their hate-filled filth rebounds on them.

    • Noor says:

      With Love, Meghan is now ranked 5 in US netflix top 10 , and doing well in UK too . The armchair experts review bombed failed miserably.

      We can expect Season 2 for WLM

      • Christina says:

        I like the show. It’s teaching me cool things. The recipes and watching her execute them are helpful. It’s like the other cooking shows.

        If they hate this format so much, why aren’t they criticizing Mary Berry’s show?! Oh, yeah: she’s white and British.

      • Sue says:

        I just now read it was renewed for a 2nd season..For this fall. I loved it!

  3. aquarius64 says:

    Brown got her marching order from the palace, saying things she wouldn’t say on US TV now, let alone to Meghan’s face. The inauthentic one is that royal kiss @$$.

    • Tessa says:

      It’s a pity ABC Good Morning America still uses her as a “royal expert.” Such a sycophant Tina is.

      • Gtwiecz says:

        And “The View”, I haven’t seen Tina there but Whoopi met Charles and has attacked Meghan. ABC I does the bidding of the RF.

  4. Louise says:

    “Fresh Prince of Montecito”? W.T.A.F. is wrong with these people?

    • Zapp Brannigan says:

      Racism. Racism is what is wrong with these people.

    • Tessa says:

      She should be called out for these remarks.

    • Eurydice says:

      Yeah, that’s actually kind of shocking on a lot of levels.

    • Jais says:

      Yeah, that was a double-take.

    • Lizzie says:

      Fresh Prince is poor old Tina Brown’s era. She thinks is a current reference.

      • Blogger says:

        Reminds me of Tom Bower’s Cadillac comment.

        Speak of the devil, has he opined yet? Haven’t heard about him since his gatecrashing of Invictus.

      • Eurydice says:

        Yes, but Janice Min said it and she’s 30 years younger than Tina, not to mention the former editor of US Weekly, back when they still had real connections.

      • windyriver says:

        Remember though, it was referenced fairly recently, by James Corden when he did the LA tour with Harry a few years ago. Said H&M should also have a place in LA as well as SB, took Harry to the house where FP was filmed, suggested it was good enough for a real prince too. At least Harry got to make a pitstop; not sure he was too jazzed about Corden‘s bit.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, what an odd choice for comparison! And not necessarily the one I would make if I am calling someone else out for being “dated”😂

      It’s also confusing – are the Sussexes the Banks family in this analogy?

    • bisynaptic says:

      🎯

    • QuiteContrary says:

      Yeah, that was such a racist dog whistle I heard it at my desk.

  5. Here Tina let me write what you are really saying. Meg is a biracial woman who has no business being successful, smart, happy and kind. She should stay in her place and never ever rise above a white women. It makes me so jealous to see her being so successful and loved by many people. How dare you marry our white Prince. I hate her!! There Tina that’s what you are really saying.

    • Caribbean says:

      This!! 💯

    • Angelica+Schuyler says:

      Your translation is spot on! It really highlights the problem these women have with Meghan.

    • MsDoe says:

      Exactly this.
      I’ve been upset at seeing all these critiques of Meghan popping up in my Youtube feed. I don’t watch them, but the headers always scream something about inauthenticity.
      They strike me as being threatened by her as a high achieving black woman. She’s like Martha Stewart, but more approachable, yet they can’t handle it because she married a prince (the good one), is stylish and gorgeous, and succeeds at everything she touches. She works hard, she tries hard, she doesn’t screw up, and they hate that.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Perfect @Susan Collins. I love the show because I love these types of shows. It’s a very good watch. My complaint (/ls)), DH loves the series too. I’m reading the negative reviews to him and he’s like, WTF? My complaint is that Meghan has become his crush.lol Not an actual complaint because I understand why. The last episode was very emotional and heart warming.

      A beautiful thing.

  6. MaisiesMom says:

    I’m also sick of every cooking show being a competition. Those shows are fine, but at this point they are having to come up with more and more bizarre challenges that often result in dishes I would never want to eat. No matter how talented a chef is, if you tell them “You have 40 minutes to shop for, prepare and plate a dish using chicken livers, grapefruit, Fritos and candied ginger, GO!!!?” They are going to struggle to produce something appealing.

    Also, I can think about Zelensky and Ukraine and still watch an escapist lifestyle show. It’s not a binary choice. If anything, the former makes me need the latter.

    I can’t bear this woman.

    • Jais says:

      Thank you. It’s not a binary choice. What an oppressive viewpoint. As Meghan says in her show WLM, we’re multifaceted folks. From smooth jazz to metal. From lifestyle shows to politics.

    • Becks1 says:

      Yeah, I am so sick of everything on food network being a competition. I like Diners Drive Ins and Dives but even that gets old.

      This show is just about the good vibes and I think it works. I started it last night (finally) thinking I would watch one or two episodes and I watched four. My 10 year old watched some of it with me and his takeaways were:

      “I didnt expect a royal to do something that requires grit” (GRIT is a big buzzword at his school)
      and
      “we need more honey and lemons in our house. I’m going to open a honey and lemon bakery when I’m older.”

      Then he had tea with honey in it this morning LOL.

      And I think the dumpster fire that is the world makes this show more of a success not less of one. It’s pretty much pure escapism. Let me forget about DT for 35 minutes and watch Meghan make candles or kimchi in a lovely kitchen with a gorgeous view.

      • MrsCope says:

        Love that @Becks1 ! My son asked if we could watch “this show forever.” We’re a big tea family over here and can’t wait to try our hand at the cake. One-pot pasta is on the docket for tonight! It really is a lovely show.

      • Barb Mill says:

        I agree. I used to watch the food network back then. I’m not interested in watching anything that’s on now.it’s so much competition and it’s like the drama between the contestants is what they highlighted. I do still watch HGTV but mostly as background filler when I’m doing something else. I watch PBS old cooking show. Americas test kitchen and things like that. I love Meghan’s show because it’s so much more interesting than just a cooking show.
        I’m so happy it’s been renewed. Read they filmed 16 episodes because they had confidence it would be successful.

      • Lorelei says:

        @Becks exactly! It’s escapism and we’ve never needed it more than we do right now, at this awful and precarious moment in time. Our brains absolutely need a show like this atm. Tina is just so off the mark in every way here.

        And we all know that if Kate released videos on their YouTube channel (is that even still active, btw?) of her baking with the kids or whatever, she’d be praised to the high heavens. But since it’s Meghan, it must be awful.

    • LittlePenguin says:

      @MaisiesMom, I couldn’t have said it better myself! Sometimes, when the world is on fire, you need to escape it for your mental/physical/emotional health and if it’s WLM, then what does anyone else care?

    • SarahCS says:

      To this point, my main cookery viewing these days is Masterchef Australia, I love it because they’re there for about three months start to finish and all the contestants share a house so they really bond with each other. Sure they want to win but they’ll also help each other out during the competitive stuff.

      I also like that in this most recent season they’ve cut so much of the ‘noise’ that the earlier seasons had, no time limits on getting ingredients from the pantry, a pretty standard cooking time for each cook. Less gimmicks and more focus on getting creativity and great food from the contestants.

  7. ThatGirlThere says:

    Some people, like Tina Brown, just can’t handle Meghan living her best life and want to humble her. They’re not don’t like seeing a confident, happy Black biracial woman thriving, and it’s uncomfortable for them. Newsflash: Meghan doesn’t need to apologize for being herself and loving her life.

  8. Dee(2) says:

    These people are sick. They are so angry that Meghan won’t be who they want her to be so that they can make money by writing books and projecting thoughts, opinions, and likes and dislikes on her. That’s why they’re really upset. She isn’t an empty vessel that they can write endless articles about that can’t/won’t be combated by the subjects own words. They want and are used to a painted doll. You can even hear it in how they spoke about Archie. He’s not a real child with wants and desires of his own, he exists to be written about as member of the BRF that’s it.

    And why do they keep acting like because something doesn’t appeal to them specifically, it shouldn’t exist? It’s ok for something not to be for you, but they act like Meghan exists to answer their questions.

    • Blogger says:

      Meghan’s not an empty vessel like Kate. Hillary Mantel was right.

      Anyway, the mystique went out a long time ago when Charles allowed the tabloids in and allowed the Sussexes to be fodder. You reap what you sow Chuck.

    • Lover says:

      I agree. They’re angry that WLM is not a reality show that exploits her and her family to satisfy their malicious voyeurism. That’s all I can figure regarding the claim of “inauthenticity” because what’s inauthentic about cooking recipes or arranging flowers? The problem isn’t inauthenticity, it’s that they want gossip and dirt and they’re not getting it. That’s why they complain the show’s not in her house; they want to see the “real” thing so they can criticize it. They want to ogle the kids and slam her for being a bad mom. They want to see Harry and her interact so they can imagine fissures in the relationship. They want it to be the Osbournes or Kardashians … which are also scripted, not-real shows! They don’t want to hear her ideas, they want to consume her “real life” so they can tear it apart. So yeah, if you don’t want to watch a cooking/lifestyle show, then don’t … but don’t complain that the show isn’t the thing you invented in your head for it to be.

      • Babz says:

        I love this comment so much I want to marry it! Perfect analysis! 👏🏻👏🏻

  9. Tessa says:

    Brown is the fossil not Meghan. She is always protective of her “dear beloved” royals. Such a bitter betty. Brown is inauthentic and very obvious. she placates Charles and the lazy Wales. Kate and William are lazy and Kate is an anachronism, never worked for a living and took on that Jigsaw job for a very short time. I never liked Brown’s book about Diana nor the Palace Papers. Such a phony. Is Brown going to get honors from Huevo now?

  10. Maxine Branch says:

    Meghan’s greatest asset to me is her authenticity. Many of those old white men and women speaking re her authenticity have never met her so they are coming to a conclusion based off of their lived experiences and the garbage their colleagues write. Brown has never had access to Meghan which she probably never will so of course she is a hater. Tina Brown is a relic from the past who needs to know how she fits into the current narratives. Why would anyone come to her for advice when she appears to be struggling with reality.? Brown dates herself with her every utterance. When those haters realize they are not the target for this show, they will rest in peace. Meghan is so beyond those folks now. As the CEO of Netflix previously stated, hate the Sussexes or love them, you will be watching and this is exactly what is happening. Keep driving the numbers up haters as you help Meghan build her empire.

    • Blogger says:

      Good point.

      “Who’s Tina?”

      “Some bitter hag who hates Meghan. Used to run a magazine.”

      “Never heard of her.”

  11. Angelica Schuyler says:

    I’ve come to the conclusion that people who think the show is ‘inauthentic’ really mean that they’re upset that Meghan isn’t struggling and miserable because that’s how they envision her in their minds. Her being happy and joyful is the exact opposite of the (false) narrative they’ve tried to spin for so long.

    Welcome to reality. The Duchess of Sussex is thriving in spite of the naysayers. Her joyful life is truly authentic and they just have to deal with that reality.

    • JanetDR says:

      And isn’t it nice to see Meghan Sussex thriving and being her authentic self?! I couldn’t be more delighted 💗

  12. Tessa says:

    3 2 1, articles featuring Penny Junor, Tom Markle, and Sam Markle. And Paul Burrell

    • Blogger says:

      😂 might as well get it over and done with. Bandwagon, hate train, they need to get it all out of their system!

  13. Snuffles says:

    I think the underlying message here is that they’re worried people will start seeing Meghan for who she really is—rather than through the lens of the narrative the British tabloids created while she was a royal. They know that before she joined the royal family, Meghan had a spotless reputation.

    That’s why there’s a focus on the idea that she’s trying to “erase the past” and return to the Tig/Suits-era Meghan—because that’s the real her, not the false image they painted. The concern is that the public will recognize her as the kind-hearted, thoughtful, gift-giving, cooking-with-love, hostess-with-the-mostess person she has always been.

    • Lorelei says:

      Excellent point, @Snuffles. I wonder how many people will start hate-watching the show, but actually end up enjoying it 🙃

  14. Lizzie says:

    Maybe Tina Brown can feel sorry for someone whose show isn’t in Netflix top ten.

  15. Sparrow says:

    I am currently watching it. It’s not my thing because this kind of thing is never my thing. I hate cooking. Our guests get Deliveroo options and a glass of wine. But it’s a beautiful setting etc and I’m actually enjoying it. Meghan is clearly a perfectionist who works hard, which seems at odd with being relaxed and carefree, but then again Mr Sparrow and I have a low bar; our old house is falling down and he owns three jumpers that rotate during the year. You couldn’t curate our lifestyle because we are not aspirational. Fundamentally there seems to be anger that Meghan is a wealthy woman, making aspirational TV showcasing the associated elements of a wealthy lifestyle. Do we really expect to see this mind of woman pushing a trolley round Asda telling us about beans on toast. It’s almost: how dare she have nice things and how dare she be rich and self made. One thing that I think critics are hitting on correctly is how this kind of TV, plus wellness content in general, has had its day. I think that’s right but that doesn’t make Meghan guilty of anything other than being part of a moment that is on its way out. The scale of vitriol thrown at this programme makes it sounds like she’s filmed herself throwing cats into rivers. The BRF must be rubbing their hands with glee that this has distracted attention from the channel 4 doc fallout.

    • Blogger says:

      But it’s on Netflix. No one is forcing them to watch it.

      Yet they watch it so they can keep on hating a woman who has done nothing wrong to them.

      And Meghan would have gone to Waitrose first. She was the Cotswold type until The Sun blabbed where they lived. So there’s always been the classist element where one knows where you are in the hierarchy but no, can’t have the aspirational Californian lifestyle that nabbed a Prince.

    • Jais says:

      Yeah, I’m not the hostess with the mostest either but I like how it’s given me thought of a few little things I can do if I’m capable. And the thing about wellness content and these type of shows is that they always seem to cycle back around. So are they on their way out? Idk? At this point though, being a lifestyle show in the Netflix top 10 would suggest there’s still some type of an appetite for this type of programming. I’ve been saying it on all the threads but I really hope we can get a holiday season😂

    • Alteya says:

      It hasn’t had its day. We need thing s like with love, Meghan to get through the hellscape.

    • Lover says:

      I agree with much of what you said. That said, I work in a bookstore and I don’t see wellness or lifestyle losing popularity, at least not in the U.S., based on what I see selling every day. Martha Stewart’s 100th cookbook, which is basically a retread, sold like gangbusters over the holidays. Daphne’s Diary, an expensive no-ad British magazine that focuses on no-stress recipes, crafts, and pretty photography, sells out regularly. Crafting kits, herbal medicine, pretty stationery, and anything cutesy is popular. I see Meghan as a Martha for millennials: more earthy and worldly-wise, less Brahmin and exclusive, equally as wealthy and beautiful. No one watched Martha for relatability or excitement, we watched her to relax and be inspired.

    • Nerd says:

      I’m not sure if she’s necessarily a perfectionist but, a person can be a perfectionist as well as be relaxed and carefree. How I am at work or with certain projects or things that need a certain level of attention to detail isn’t going to be the same person once I finish the project and can finally relax and be carefree. I find as a POC there is an added pressure on us to get things perfect compared to our counterparts. I saw a video recently about how Tucker Carlson made the racist comment that if his surgeon walked into the room before the procedure and she was a black woman he would be concerned that she wouldn’t be able to perform the surgery as well as someone white. The response in the video is that as a black woman they would feel the opposite because as a black person she would have faced more challenges and questions on her abilities and so she would have to work harder to prove herself than someone who wasn’t black or a woman. That’s how I have always looked at people questioning a person of colors abilities or desire to be better at the job than others. The burden and unfair expectation is always there, so we have to be more careful and thorough.

      • Jais says:

        Thank you. People can be both a perfectionist and carefree. It’s just that both come out at different times.

  16. Lia says:

    I agree with the last paragraph Kaiser, and I have seen constructive criticism, not by vipers, that the show felt too much like an extension of the Tig and kind of stuck in that Pinterest era time.
    I believe the show thrived when Meghan felt excited either to learn or to share something jointly learnt with someone, there she also came across as less guarded in a way, which is why my favourite episodes were with Roy Choi and Vicky Tsai. Am I the only who thinks that the episode with Daniel Martin was NOT a good choice for the pilot? IMO they needed something more punchy and compelling where she could still showcase her hosting strenghts. It actually ended up being my least favourite episode.
    I won’t even address the lack of authencity criticism because it come from jealousy and projection: they can’t believe that Meghan is a warm, earnest and dorky woman with really good taste because they have always projected their insecurities and jealousy into her. Also, racism is definitely a factor, you can see them thinking: how dare someone like her exude chic coastal mom vibes?

    • Maxine Branch says:

      I enjoyed the show with Daniel specifically because he appeared out of his comfort zone. With Meghan’s encouragement he seemed to relax into the cooking. This is Meghan’s life, Pinterest ornTig, she is sharing her life with us through her lens.

      • Jais says:

        Yeah, I enjoyed the one with Daniel. He needed a Banda-aid! He was like my surrogate, as someone who is not used to cooking. I laughed when he said he couldn’t do stuff at his counter bc he didn’t have one in his studio and Meghan said well maybe in your lap then. But even if the feel is dated, my thought is…okay? And?

      • sevenblue says:

        I enjoyed Daniel’s episode because he was like me in the kitchen. 😭😭 Poor guy didn’t know what to do. It was so thoughtful of Meghan, she showed him something easy he can do at home.

    • Sunny says:

      Agree with this. That there are constructive criticisms of the show especially because it does feel a little dated in its approach but most of the writing about it has been rooted in racism, anger, and therefore isn’t worth taking seriously.

      The authenticity critique is false to me. I think anyone who has lived under as much scrutiny as she does will naturally be a little guarded. The first few episodes of the show, it felt like she was nervous and made the show feel a bit awkward. But to me, when she settled in as host, especially when she gets excited at learning something new, you really get to see her warm, dorky, earnest energy. I loved the Roy Choi episode! The fact that they try to portray this woman as a narcissist and monster says way more about them than her.

    • Becks1 says:

      The Daniel episode did feel the most stilted to me and I dont know if thats because it was the first one (we’re assuming it was the first one filmed, but it might not have been). But I also wonder if its because those two are so close and he has been there for her for so much (he did her wedding day makeup, he went to her baby shower, etc) that they were trying to be careful to not overshare, not give away inside jokes, etc.

      I did think he made a point of talking about how this is who Meghan always has been.

      • Lia says:

        Good point, I could see that it was supposed to show that she has always been a thoughtful caring friend and host. It felt indeed so stilted to me and maybe you’re right that she felt extra guarded not to share too much of their inner friendship. That came across a bit too in the episode with Abigail and Kelly, whereas it didn’t in the one with the majohng group, which I suppose are more recent friends.

      • Tessa says:

        Maybe he is thinking of the cameras on him. And that he will be on a show. Some are not all “at ease” about that. It’s not like they were lunching without cameras. I think it was fine

    • L4Frimaire says:

      I agree that Meghan really shines when working with chefs. Those are one of the strengths of the show. The Danuel and Vicky episodes were my favorite friend ones and I’m low key obsessed with Tracy. She wanted to showcase the friendships thst supported her during that time and those that helped her feel welcome in Montecito. The Tig throwback criticism is a bit off base. This was her built in audience and who was supporting her from the beginning. These were the people wanting her to get back on instagram, who were saying bring back the Tig since January 2020. These are her loyal fans so yes it’s retro and giving them what they want, and they love it. She held a screening for them so they are part of shaping this show. If there is a 2nd season they can build on the shows best elements and tweak those that are less resonant or “too 2014” lol.

    • Lauren says:

      I came away from the first episode wishing Daniel did make up content and I don’t usually watch that type of stuff. Maybe it’s his voice or maybe it’s knowing he taught Meghan and her makeup is always flawless

  17. Gail Hirst says:

    Inauthentic my butt
    I swear, that’s all I’ve got. Meghan, we love you with all our butt. “I’d say heart, but my butt is bigger”.
    Inauthentic?
    F off forever

  18. Eurydice says:

    I was alive during the Obama era and I can say I didn’t need Meghan’s show then, but I certainly need it now. Every day, I’m bombarded with hideous news I can do nothing about, but I can do something about my immediate environment – I can make my home a bit prettier, I can allow myself coffee in a nice cup, I can do something kind for a friend, I can help a person in need. For me, WLM isn’t about baking a cake or making crudités, it’s an attitude about controlling what you can in life.

    • Alteya says:

      Yes, a thousand times.

    • Jais says:

      That last sentence👌.

    • bisynaptic says:

      You can also organize, protest, and resist the fascist encroachment.

      • Eurydice says:

        Well, that, too. I participate in local protests, I work with City Hall on neighborhood improvement projects and volunteer at a local homeless shelter. Anything else you want me to do?

    • Kelly says:

      I couldn’t agree more! Instead of watching the news I am also experimenting with drinking healing, homemade herbal tea, exercising and appreciating nature, so WLM definitely appeals to my current state of mind.

    • Maja says:

      💯❣️❣️
      Yes, it’s about doing the good, the beautiful and the right thing with what is possible – making people happy and yourself happy too

    • Lorelei says:

      Freaking exactly, @Eurydice. Tina seems to have completely missed the point of the show. Meghan isn’t trying to change the world with it, but she’s sure bringing it some much-needed joy

  19. Amy Bee says:

    If anyone’s a cultural fossil it’s Tina Brown who still riding on Diana’s coattails and the fact that she was once the editor of Vanity Fair. I think the biggest problem that these British and white people in general have is that they had an idea of who Meghan should be and they attack her when she doesn’t do what they thought she would do.

    • Tessa says:

      She really does not like Diana, and since Diana was dead and gone she could not refute Tina’s statement that she was her “friend.” It was only one lunch she had with Diana. I cringed at some of the things she wrote about Diana. She even claimed based on hearsay that Diana came on to Charles and sat on his lap during the first weekend he showed interest–where the two of them sat on haystacks and Diana said she felt sorry that his great uncle passed on.. It is a bizarro world because Diana was put off by Charles advances and his invite for her to go home with him. I think Tina is wanting a title.

      • Blogger says:

        Tina’s already got a title through her dead husband.

        She wants relevance. She is the Anna Wintour that failed. There can only be one Anna and Tina ain’t she.

  20. Mel says:

    Inauthentic is white woman for: this Black woman isn’t subservient enough for me or why isn’t she seeking my friendship? Why isn’t she jumping through hoops so I can deign to speak to her? They don’t like it when we’re too secure or confident, when we choose not to befriend them.

  21. SURE says:

    “It feels like.. a mental institution for wealthy… It kind of had that lobotomized vibe” – a perfect description of the Windsor cult.

    • SURE says:

      Just to add, if it wasn’t already clear: Janice Min is a racist and a misogynist – just like her co-host. I guess we must admire her bravery in choosing to be a misogynist and a racist given that she is a woman with Asian heritage. Go, Janice! That’s how you join the white women who love to pull down black women club.

    • bisynaptic says:

      🎯

    • Lorelei says:

      @Sure, I hereby nominate this for comment of the week! ☠️

  22. L4Frimaire says:

    Tins Brown is an ass, but here’s the thing. Meghan and Harry did make big waves and big impacts as royals. They forever changed that institution and they’ll, actually Meghan will never be forgiven for doing that. To this day the royals want back that worldwide attention they got without the couple that brought it, and try imitating aspects of civilian Harry and Meghan’s life, like podcasts. jam wars etc. They expected Harry and Meghan to continue to be this game changer, set the world on fire when all they want to do is raise their kids, earn a living and fund their foundation. They’ve left that stage. All this criticism is starting to gel under this “ inauthentic “ theme” and starting to all have the same whiff of they want a reality show, with diva Meg stomping about in heels making grown men cry. That’s what they want from her little lifestyle cooking show. They want a glimpse into her life they’re not getting because how could this woman who upended the British monarchy just have a bright little show about cocktails and one pan spaghetti? As for the remark about her friends, they want Real Housewives. The show is a throwback because the show is actually about what she said it was about. People are watching, making the dishes, arranging flowers, so no, it’s not gonna set the world on fire, she’s not gonna sit around yelling with the Real Housewives and she’s just going to quietly make her money while tending her bees. This in itself seems to rile up a lot of people, so wonder about that impact.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Excellent comment @L4Frimaire. DH is a bit enthralled with Meghan now. Have to up my game. Don’t blame him though. I get it.

  23. Elizabeth says:

    I like Meghan. I’m team Sussex for sure. But I do think she’s a bit on the wind right now protect-wise—and that’s ok! Stars are just like us lol.

    That being said I think some of these bad reviews about her being inauthentic would have better had she filmed in her own home.

    Of course nothing she does will ever appease the uk tabloids. But perhaps the American reviews would have been kinder. I think people wanted to see her real life.

    • Jais says:

      Why in the world would she film in her own home?? No one does that so why should she? For better reviews? To be called more authentic by critics she needs to open up her home? Yeah no.

      • MrsCope says:

        All of this is important work in Meghan reclaiming her humanity, joy and voice. Of course, some people wanted to see her real life. The point is, she chooses what they see. Like ANY private or public-facing citizen. She told the world she was sui****dal, and the world said “who do you think you are?!” There is nothing she could do to combat the critique of the folks calling for her to be more authentic. Remember when she acknowledged she was sad and the press criticized her for not going through the right channels to quietly express her sadness (aka bottle it up)? Remember when she shared what she was struggling with and she was brutally mocked and accused of being a perpetual victim. She’s healing, choosing joy and showing her she achieves peace when the world is on fire…. and the complaint is she’s too guarded, too happy, too rich and she’s wearing too much white.

      • Jais says:

        Agree, Mrs.Cope, there is nothing she could do about the critique of folks telling her to be more authentic. That’s not even a tangible criticism.

    • Jukia says:

      No one films lifestyle shows in their own home mainly for logistical reasons. 80 crew members in your house for weeks? If she had filmed in her home she would have been accused of invading her own privacy/exploiting her children.

    • Angied says:

      Do you think Real Housewives is authentic? It’s all scripted. Why would she film in her real home? Nobody does. Just about all of them film outside their home. All those Food Network stars film with wealthy friends when they have them on. They are either in the business or have wealth. Nobody is a average Joe from the street. Not a single food show I watch isn’t an idea taken from some other show before it. All of them have some aspect of the original Julia Child. The concepts are the same just in different forms of each other.

    • Kit says:

      Well you know people are reaching hard to find something to criticize with the whole why can’t she use her home.

      Answer: because the show is work. Home is home.

      More importantly, for security reason, no way would Meg and Harry allow it There are way too many derangers who have threatened to harm/kill them and their children.

      • MsIam says:

        @Kit exactly as you said this is work. Not just for Meghan but the whole crew of camera, lighting and sound people. Its why TV shows are filmed on a sound stage so they can control the environment as much as possible. Can you imagine trying to film in a home with two kids, dogs and now possibly a cat? So no, common sense should make it obvious why they are not going to film a show which takes several weeks to film in Meghan’s own home.

    • Zapp Brannigan says:

      Filming in her own home would have been a security issue. Would anyone here want the interior of their house, the layout, entry and exit points broadcast globally? I certainly wouldn’t. They pay a lot of money for security, no professional security outfit would advise them to film in their own home.

    • Eurydice says:

      When you film in a house, the rooms aren’t always the right size and shape to accomodate the cameras and all the shooting angles each episode might require. Walls have to come down, doorways widened, stuff gets attached to the ceilings. After I left investment banking, I worked for a small film company. And when we rented a house for a shoot it was with the requirement that we rebuild the rooms back the way they were. Some homeowners used it an opportunity to completely redecorate.

      • Renstewart says:

        This exactly @Eurydice! In addition to security concerns with strangers in your personal space.

    • alteya says:

      Sure, Jan.

    • mel says:

      No one films in their home because it’s a huge disruption. Why does she need to show anyone her home so people can troll and whine about how much the things cost in their home? I smell an undercover troll.

    • Blubb says:

      @Elizabeth
      If I see people starting with I love / like Meghan / Diana, I know now comes one of the cruder lies and theories about them. Why do you want her to risk the security of her children?

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Agree. “I love Meghan but…..”. Sign of your intention. If you love/like Meghan your recognize she’s not perfect. You don’t have to say it. Any complaints about not filming in her house or other things, are just, dumb.imo

        Love the series. I just want to be a guest at the Sussex’s home. Where I feel I would be well cared for, loved, have fun and well fed.

  24. Is That So? says:

    I find it irritating when people start policing stranger’s “authenticity”.

    I find find it galling, presumptuous and condescending when white folks can’t seem to let go of their presumed “massa” privilege to tell non-white folks where they can live, what they can do, and how they can be. Unfortunately we don’t have vaccinations for colonialism and imperialism, so Tina continues to suffer from the infections.

    I do however think that frock is Tina’s authentic self. It is as ugly as her opinions and it show the stolen aesthetic from places her national ancestors pillage and brutalized. It also prove true the adage that wearing the fine feathers of birds in no way makes you a fine bird or able to fly.

    • bisynaptic says:

      🎯

    • L4Frimaire says:

      I honestly find the criticism about her not filming the show at her house incredibly annoying. She already explained in episode 1 why that wasn’t happening. Again, just say you want a reality show and not the show on offer. They want Meghan, the Devil wears Prada version. It’s such BS to think invading her private space is a key to authenticity and demanding access that she was never going to give. We get glimpses of her home and family in her Instagram reels.

      • Eurydice says:

        They want the imaginary Meghan they spent 8 years creating. And now, “WTF? That’s not the Meghan we know in our heads! Where’s the real one we created?” It’s cognitive dissonance.

  25. Chaine says:

    I mean, Meghan is like everyone else I know who becomes a mom. There are years of time after those babies where they are immersed in being a new mom and doing mom things and when they finally come up for air, they are no longer attuned to pop culture. There’s not anything wrong with that. Not everyone needs to be doing cooking dances on TikTok. There are plenty of us who appreciate escapism of pretending the Obama era never ended.

  26. Brassy Rebel says:

    We have reached full saturation point with this simple, little show where everything has been said but not everyone has said it. Yet. But we’re getting there!

    • Angied says:

      Yes, Finally all the whiners would have said their fill. A bunch of Debbie
      Downers and professional trolls. Lord give me strength.

    • Jais says:

      Okay, that’s a perfect summation. Not everyone has been able to say what’s been already said. I’m sure there are more just waiting in the wings for their moment.

  27. Iheoma Nwakpadolu says:

    @ Sure, you are a genius!!! You caught the heart of this interview. ‘ the windsor cult… a mental institute for the wealthy’. This should be a tag line and on T-shirts. Thank you Tina brown, you know them well.

  28. Sparrow says:

    Using a new mobile which is driving me mad. I can’t see if anyone has replied underneath my comment unthread but it seems so. I must qualify that when I say these kind of shows have had their moment I am thinking more along the lines of these shows are received more critically these days, largely because we have culturally grown more cynical. (Someone upthread said these trends never truly date but flip flop back on themselves, which is a good point. ) Personally I think I was already getting weary way back with Nigella Lawson, whose carefree personality was overly laboured imo. On a side point, she used sets and paid extras, but somehow ducks the criticism levelled at Meghan using someone else’s house. Some of the Nigella filming was ridiculously faked up. As I say, I’m enjoying the beautiful setting of the show and it’s nice watching from the damp UK.

    • alteya says:

      Funny how it is only Meghan’s show that is being ‘received more critically’ and she’s the only one being dragged for not filming in her home.

    • Blogger says:

      Give me Meghan’s aspirational sunny Californian lifestyle vs the Middleton Home Counties social climbing ways.

  29. OriginalMich says:

    Inauthentic? What a weird criticism for such a genuinely gentle show. Authentically, I’ve gotten tips I plan to use. For example, I love putting together flower arrangements and enjoyed hearing about the way she goes about picking which ones to use. I plan to make the herbal tea, pasta, and cake recipes from the first episode, I loved the beautiful toasts with flowers in Kaling episode. The focaccia looks doable and delicious. So do the chicken tinga tacos and plantain chips. Don’t get me started on the Chef Choi episode. Every single thing they made is now on my list.

    I haven’t watched the other episodes yet. I’m sure they will be equally enjoyable though. Everything I’ve seen so far is well within the reach of most people and most budgets.

    FWIW, one of the things people like Brown hate about Meghan is her kind earnestness. To them, ‘real’ is judging others and stomping on them to get ahead.

  30. MikeB says:

    Inauthentic is the UKs catch word for Meghan, how many stories have there been using the word. Brown is still bashing the series despite its success.

  31. Bings says:

    I recently read an African proverb which sums up the British media and the Royalists‘ reaction to Meghan‘s show.

    „ They couldn’t find anything wrong with the rose, so they complained it had thorns.“

  32. Nerd says:

    The criticism of calling her inauthentic by people who have never met her is definitely based on bigotry and racism. It’s exactly what has happened from the very beginning of the world learning about their relationship and reacting to her “smiling too much” or being happy, articulate, intelligent and attractive. Whether consciously or unconsciously, they have this preconceived idea of what and who she must be as an American woman of color. They have this limited and biased opinion of what American women of color are and she, just like Michelle Obama, Beyoncé, Serena, Oprah and others are entering spaces that they think American WOC are too unintelligent, inarticulate and unattractive to be in. It’s the reason the word they are using the most is inauthentic and fake, even though they have never met her. It’s them calling her inauthentic even though they’ve never met her, but her own friends, who are on the show and have known you for 15 years or more are saying it’s nice seeing her being her normal happy self.

  33. Maja says:

    She is clearly trying to provoke with her sexism, her misogyny “lobotomised, mental institution for rich women” and with her racism, the crude allusion to Archie’s skin colour via the “Prince of Montecito (Prince of Bel Air) and the allusions “straight from Compton” about the origin of Archie’s mother, which was lied about by the press. She is the other side of the perversion of the man who likes to throw faeces at women.

    • Kristie says:

      Those comments are Janice Min’s. What on earth does Ms Min have against Meghan? Seems like she would love the Sussex story given her years in entertainment tabloid journalism

    • Jais says:

      Both Janice Min and Tina Brown were trying to provoke. It’s that hate-click/hate attention they’re seeking. If we’re talking about dated and cultural fossils…it sounds like they’re both going back to early aughts snark. Which was misogynistic and racist. There’s a lot of gossip columnists who say they’ve moved past that time period but it can still be found in their writing and discussions. There’s something about Meghan though that really lets people go all out. For me, it’s repelling.

      • Square2 says:

        “There’s something about Meghan though that really lets people go all out. ”

        That something is the “Pathological Envy” of a Black woman who is intelligent, beautiful, kind-hearted, hard working, and accomplished. Marrying a popular white prince is the icing on the cake, and the cherry on top is her husband loves her to pieces.

  34. MsIam says:

    Bitter doesn’t look good on you at all Tina. Try a new schtick please!

  35. Jaded says:

    You know what was inauthentic Tina? The Summer’s Eve video lovefest that Kate and William made. Blatantly inauthentic, and they even used their kids as props. Those two hate each other and are caught in a loveless sham of a marriage. Why don’t you take a run at them Tina? Oh, I know, it’s because they aren’t biracial, American, and hard workers. They’re lazy royals who don’t deserve a penny of the millions they rake in from their tax-paying citizens, but they’re white and heirs to the throne so it doesn’t matter. You’re a sad, bitter hag Tina with nothing better to do than demonize a wonderful woman who is making the world a better place.

  36. Is That So? says:

    Sometimes it take me a little time to put it together and get to the why.

    The consistent criticism in reviews and social media responses to WITH LOVE, MEGHAN has been that it is “inauthentic” and “misses the mark”. As Kaiser mentions a few days ago, the excess negativity of the responses seem concerted and organized, i.e. review bombing.

    The Sussexes are praised for several personal qualities and two that are often mentioned by people who meet them are their genuineness and “common touch”. These are not attributes associated with the current Prince and Princess of Wales.

    It seems the PR machine and fans of the PnP o Wales can’t convinced the world of their charm, so the next best thing is for them to convince the public that the Sussex also lack the qualities they are praised for. They seem to be working under the old propaganda adage that it is easier to convince people of your opponents deficiency that to convince them of your strength, when you have none.

    It reminds me of the current US federal administration that is drilling crap and calling it gold.

  37. Real Housewife of Kailua says:

    I’m watching the show and enjoying it, and I’m not a big DoS fan by any means. It is escapist, it is aspirational, but I don’t think it is irrelevant, especially in this political moment. Making gifts for Uncle Daniel’s husband. Talking about growing up, the schools she went to, being mindful of her grandmother’s values and her home training.

    The guests she has on the show are not just friends and / or celebrities, they reflect a worldview of, let’s do something posh (homemade beeswax candles), and something more street (the hilarious and cute Roy Choi, who helped start the whole gourmet food truck thing). Dare I say, high-low, like her wardrobe? People may not like it, but it is 100% authentic.

    She’s also sub-tweeting various storylines, like the can’t-keep-staff thing. Notice how much the crew are involved, she makes them breakfast sandwiches, etc.?

    I actually learned a lot too. Not the baked salt branzino (gah), but I am curious about the crudite-on-the-counter idea! And I loved her flower arrangement, I have a flower cage like the one she used in my cart right now.

    Looking forward to finishing the series.

  38. pamspam says:

    I’m no Meghan stan, but I like her and I’m finding the show pretty enjoyable. Literally my only criticism would be the overuse of the word “sweet” – it grates on me a bit haha. But overall I like the show and might even incorporate some of her ideas into my own non-glamourous life!!

    • Aiglentine says:

      Meghan can be a little twee, but that’s not a crime. Let her be as twee as she wants to bee.

      • pamspam says:

        Nope, not a crime at all. “Sweet” was just getting on my nerves a bit. I still like Meghan and enjoy the show. She seems like a sweet person (see what I did there??). I hope the show does really well.

      • Blogger says:

        I like twee 😂

    • Tessa says:

      I am proud to be a Meghan fan. Just saying. I like also she is not letting the derangers like Tina defeat her. And not giving into it. Sweet is a positive word.

    • sevenblue says:

      Honestly, it is admirable Meghan didn’t lose all her inner happiness and joy even though there is a whole country’s media trying to break her. I remember one of the palace advisors telling Omid that H&M are like teenagers in the spiritual sense. It is a consistent trait for both of them and it is really a huge luck these two dorks found each other 😭😭

      • pamspam says:

        They really do seem perfectly suited for one another! I kinda love that they are just living their best lives unbothered by toxic relatives.

  39. Aiglentine says:

    Tina Brown calling someone else a cultural fossil? I am learning in my dotage just how prevalent projection is

  40. Jane says:

    She’ll be dead soon enough. She’s already grizzled and can’t see out of her eyeslits.

  41. Tessa says:

    Hostage situation! Her first guest did not want to leave. He enjoyed the lunch. Wild talk by a person who does not like Meghan

  42. Maja says:

    These people think they are the real deal and believe that someone is only authentic if they look like them and are like them. They don’t understand the principle of authenticity at all and should rather keep quiet about things they don’t understand.

  43. Angied says:

    Ha Ha!. The jokes on that old fossil. Season 2 is on it’s way! She’s just mad that she doesn’t know Harry or Meghan. She can’t grift after their family like she did his mother.

    • Alteya says:

      Attacking Sussex family, mostly Meghan, is their grift. That’s how they earn their money, by keeping the racist hate train rolling..

  44. sparrow says:

    I’m so sorry if this duplicates. As I say, new phone is driving me round the bend. Meghan not using her own home fits with someone keen to keep her house unknown and her family as safe as possible; even the most basic layout could help a nutter intent on breaking in. (Nigella sometimes used other people’s homes.) And I feel sorry that she does at times seem guarded; however can you imagine how much she feels she can’t say about her family. The BRF should be thankful that she’s being so careful when she could kick back and tell it like it is.

    • Lizzie says:

      Compare to Magnolia table, Joanna Gains cooking show. I’m sure she is not in the kitchen of her own home. I know Ina Garten built a small house/set on her property to film. It’s not a big deal.

      • L4Frimaire says:

        I really liked Fixer Upper but I did not like Joanna Gaine’s cooking show. Same with Michelle Obama’s kiddie cooking show. At the time thought it would be a fun watch with my younger child but I could not get into it. However I put it out of my head and didn’t go on and on about it, nor did I see widespread write ups of those two shows. I enjoyed Meghan’s show. Some episodes are better than others but each one has something you use and it’s visually appealing. If they esnt a glimpse of Meghan’s hone, they can check her Instagram.

      • somebody says:

        You also don’t see write-ups about the Gaines, Property Brothers, etc. all copying one another because they use the same basic show format.

    • Weird_cat says:

      Honestly, British people don’t have any braincells. It’s obvious. Even the defenders aren’t at all. British people are nasty, snobbish, racist and stupid. My 30 years of dealing with these fools confirms that. I have zero respect for any Brits. They get exactly what they deserve. Sparrow, you are often snarky, it’s noticeable.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Weird_cat, I have no idea of your experiences, but to go after all of the British when I doubt you’ve met them all is more than a little over the top. You must be a new reader here, otherwise you would realize that your personal jab at Sparrow is as far off the beam as it can be. What you’ve done, in my opinion, is to bully someone.

  45. Over it says:

    I will skip the niceness and get straight to my point. First off I have never heard of the podcast Tina is on but that’s because I don’t go searching for no bodies . Second, Tina , you have never met Meghan so how the f would you know who or what she is she bitter old B . Like get over yourselves already. If Meghan was white like the other many white women who have these kinds of show . We won’t be hearing all this criticism. If copy Kate decided tomorrow that she wants to do a cooking show for early buttons / one second I started picturing Kate cooking and I just saw a kitchen catch fire and an assistant standing there with a fire extinguisher and the biggest first aid box you ever saw . I pause to laugh. Anyway if Kate did this. It would be the most important wonderful thing since sliced bread. I am so sick of All the hate directed at Meghan as if she isn’t human and someone wife and mother and daughter and friend. It’s not right and it’s time it stops.

    • kirk says:

      Copy Kate doing a cooking show for early buttons — I too pause to laugh. And laugh and laugh and laugh.

  46. QuiteContrary says:

    They really want Meghan to conform to every stereotype they have in their twisted minds about what Black women are.

    Fortunately, Meghan’s friends know her for who she is: a kind, adorably dorky, generous person who gets excited about making visitors feel comfortable and welcome. And we’ll get to see it in not one, but at least two, seasons of WLM.

    The breathtaking racism of wanting Archie to be “the coolest royal,” the “fresh prince of Montecito.” They hate that this multiracial family is wealthy and happy. They’re seething.

  47. Square2 says:

    Statistics don’t lie. On The Global Netflix Top Show List: First day “With Love, Meghan” dropped, number 10, 2nd day – no 7, 3rd day – no 7 (no 1 to 6 were all dramas). Yes, the World is in turmoil, but people also want some feel good, relaxed, escapism programs to watch. Just like people read fantasy or romance novels. So any show is a hit is “cultural relevant” at that said time period.

    P.S. Tina is becoming a “cultural fossil” before our eyes.

    • windyriver says:

      It was consistently at #6 in the US the past few days, and briefly #5, yesterday I think. Pretty nice showing for that type of programming.

  48. SenseOfTheAbsurd says:

    Who asked that dusty hag? Nobody, that’s who.

    As to the show, I’m enjoying it. Yes it’s quite silly and bordering on self-parody, but that’s what you want in an escapist lifestyle show. It’s great and deserves the high ratings, and the collective meltdown by ridiculous haters desperate for something to be negative about is just the icing on the cake.

  49. Lizzie says:

    Poor old Tina Brown, she plays the fool again. WLM will have a second season. If you listen closely, you might hear Diana laughing in the wind.

  50. Pat Gaddess says:

    It was renewed for season 2

    • SunnyDays says:

      I just finished the last episode and it said ‘Its official, another season is coming”. Woohoo, good for her!! Let the haters hate!

    • TurbanMa says:

      Yay!!!! Oh I’m so happy. I just helped my 80 year old mother put the Netflix app on her old Chromebook so she could watch it.

  51. tamsin says:

    Wow! The butchery in these two women. Is Tina Brown reduced to being a professional bitch about Meghan? Is she now a royal commentator, which to my mind is descending to the lowest ranks of public writing and commentary- I just can’t call it journalism. Tina opens her mouth these days and proves she’s a fossil. “Royal Expert” should be a category that brings forth absolute scorn.

    • sevenblue says:

      She was known as a “Diana expert”, now as a “Meghan expert”, because no one gives a sh*t about other ones. And they call H&M irrelevant. 😂😂

  52. SenseOfTheAbsurd says:

    I feel quite sorry for Pamela Anderson, collateral damage in this psychodrama. All that business last week accusing WLM of copying Pam’s show shot for shot, and how they’re all honking on about how terrible it is.

  53. DeeSea says:

    Irrelevant cultural fossil says what now???

  54. TurbanMa says:

    My gawd that would be like my 5’ self calling everyone short. She’s the relic, she’s inauthentic and she’s telling on herself. Goodbye , Clown.

  55. AC says:

    She’s just mad she doesn’t have a top 10 show on Netflix(in many countries), top 5 in the U.S. LoL! No one GAF what TB thinks .

  56. Cassie says:

    She has already filmed another series ,that’s hilarious for the critics .

    Netflix must have been happy with the numbers and now those nasty,jealous,vindictive haters are going to have to load up on another lot of disappointment that Meghan is still thriving .

    Well done to her ,she is unbreakable .

  57. debbie says:

    Daily Beast totally says take me seriously … not!

    This totally unimportant person has an axe to grind, she is middle aged, British and so green and bitter with envy she has to discharge her bile somewhere

  58. Mayp says:

    Inauthentic and a cultural fossil? You mean like Tina’s bad ’70s eyebrows?

  59. MsKrisTalk says:

    This crazy lady should be put out to pasture. The more the royal family mouthpieces complain about Meghan, the worse the royals look. The only fossils are located on salty island.

  60. Caseysmom says:

    I’ve read this site for years and I have a suggestion: please refer to Meghan as biracial and not Black. She refers to herself as biracial. I am a Black woman and I think we should not erase her identity, which is what happens when you decide how to define her.

    • Renstewart says:

      I totally agree. The Black reference is historical from slavery and southern states. All people who were in 1/16th Black were told that they would be referred to as Negroes and considered inferior. Ridiculous but true. Biracial is appropriate, especially for Lili and Archie since the are 1/4 black.

  61. Liz - L says:

    In a world of toxic energy what’s wrong with a nice feel good show. No one is being forced to watch it. Didn’t TB marry a cultural fossil.

  62. Lissen says:

    Friends, here’s a palate cleanser – a fair, balanced, and thoughtful review. We need it after all that craziness.

    https://theeverygirl.com/netflix-with-love-meghan-review/

    • Libra says:

      Loved it. Thank you.

    • Eurydice says:

      Thanks, a very nice article. Glamour had a good one, too. And here’s one from Eater that highlights Meghan’s and the show’s California POV. It couldn’t be opposite than the British Royal Family. No wonder the left-behinds are having problems with authenticity.

      https://la.eater.com/2025/3/5/24378571/meghan-markle-duchess-of-sussex-with-love-meghan-netflix-los-angeles-love-letter

      • Lissen says:

        Thank you! Enjoyed that!!!

      • kirk says:

        Eurydice – Thanks for the Eater article. It’s well written with a clear theme. One sentence really stuck out — it’s one of the most complete, but succinct, descriptions of the not-so-invisible contract between BRFCo & Associates: “Since stepping away from their royal duties in 2020, Meghan and Prince Harry, along with their two children, Archie and Lili, have settled into civilian life in Montecito and quietly begun to build full lives here away from the stifling imperial gaze of the British monarchy and the tabloid press that abets it.”

        When it comes to Meghan, virtually all British publications, including Economist, Financial Times, and Guardian turn into rabid royalist tabloids who must destroy Meghan in order to uphold the monarchy. When else have you ever seen the Economist write a scathing review about a garden and home style TV show?

  63. Lauren says:

    I know a lot of people on here immediately jump to racism when they see the accusation of “inauthentic” but this actually something I’ve often run into in how Europeans, especially Brits, view Americans in general. Until they visit the US many find American reputation for smiling and being helpful ect… very inauthentic. Like we must all be in customer service mode any time we’re in public instead of being ourselves

    • Me at home says:

      This is very true, and I say that as someone with a lot of British relatives. But Tina Brown has visited the US a lot and should know better about helpful Americans. It still rings of racism to me.

    • Bronco says:

      Lol what Brit ever says inauthentic? Like the entire UK is based on inauthentic. They pride themselves on it. It’s how they live their lives. This is how you spot an ‘inauthentic’ troll. See ya

  64. sammi says:

    Tin Brown nose…Epstein’s friend and house party guest…………. “inauthentic and a fossil”…Looking in the mirror as she wrote this piece and it reflects her own character and out of date views perfectly….just got the name wrong of the person she was talking about.

  65. AC says:

    I love the conversations that Meghan has with her guests and to me it’s so relatable as I grew up in LA(esp the episode with Roy Choi another LA native). I also grew up making sun tea with my siblings, I still love Mexican pizza from Taco Bell, Korea town in LA does have some of the best Korean food outside of Seoul(as LA is so diverse), and I (as well as my sister and brother) tidies up before we leave a hotel or a vacation rental(our parents taught us home manners). I just don’t think Brits understand American culture at all except what they see on tv. They also stereotype us all eating fast food when in actuality many of us love home cooked meals(and growing fruits and vegetables from our gardens).
    I was talking to a British friend who has lived in CA for years, when she had visited the UK recently she noticed some people there were unhappy compared to here. But then again she’s been used to people smiling and just casual small talks(without it being strange).

  66. Beverley says:

    Washed up, envious, lying, racist floozy says what now?

  67. maisie says:

    Tina Brown can eat a bag of rocks. She’s the female Piers Morgan–wants so badly to be an insider, but knows she won’t ever be.

    She was despised at Vanity Fair and the New Yorker, they couldn’t wait to get rid of her.

    I’m enjoying WLM. It’s a bit twee, but Meghan is clever and her presentations are adorable and pretty.
    She just seems NICE.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment