The British Charity Commission has now opened up an investigation into what the hell is happening with Sentebale. Despite some drama in the earliest years of Sentebale, the charity had been in very good standing for about fifteen years. They brought in a few million a year, mostly from polo-game fundraisers, and they had steady donations. Things shifted in 2023 when Sophie Chandauka came on board as the chairwoman and immediately began butting heads with everyone. In March, the majority of the board of trustees resigned in protest of Chandauka, then Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso resigned in protest too. Chandauka has spent the past week and a half on a completely bonkers publicity campaign, throwing out every kind of royalist fan-fic accusation she can think of.
The Charity Commission seems to be gathering information from both sides – if Chandauka has evidence of all of the bonkers sh-t she’s claimed, she can provide it to the commission. It sounds like Prince Harry and the former trustees have already started providing their evidence to the commission. Harry and Seeiso’s statement this week included this: “On behalf of the former trustees and patrons, we share in the relief that the Charity Commission confirmed they will be conducting a robust inquiry. We fully expect it will unveil the truth that collectively forced us to resign. What has transpired over the last week has been heartbreaking to witness, especially when such blatant lies hurt those who have invested decades in this shared goal.” Blatant lies! Tell ‘em. Anyway, the mood within the British tabloids has really shifted over the course of the week. To the point where the Mail ran this exclusive in which sources question whether Chandauka really had the board’s authorization to go on that consultant spending spree:
Prince Harry fell out with the boss of his beloved charity Sentebale partly due to her high spending on business consultants, insiders have claimed. They claim the acrimonious boardroom battle that caused the Duke of Sussex, his co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, and the charity’s trustees to mass resign from their roles was due to financial worries and disagreements.
The chair of Harry’s charity Dr Sophie Chandauka, 47, has spent more than £427,000 on consultant fees since she took on the post in July 2023, according to The Times.
Sentebale’s latest accounts show it only earned a total income of £3.41million, leaving some in the organisation concerned due to the high spending on consultants. The consultants were employed to pursue a strategy to get donations from wealthy individuals and foundations in the US, but sources close to former trustees told the BBC they had not delivered results. They claim that if the US fundraising strategy had worked this crisis in running the charity might have been averted. Although a spokesman for Sentebale told The Times that the board ‘acted collectively on major decisions’, a source close to the departed patrons suggested otherwise.
They told the paper: ‘It’s important to note that this decision was made unilaterally, without board approval.’
The highest bill on consultants was for £185,000, which was paid to Lebec, a ‘woman-led strategy firm’ founded by Alix Lebec, a former asset manager who has held leadership roles at the World Bank and Water.org. A spokeswoman for Sentebale told MailOnline the charity’s board was ‘aware of and approved the contract with Lebec’.
The charity said it hired US firm Lebec to help build a new fundraising strategy, and that by October 2024 a team of six consultants had set up 65 key relationships with potential Sentebale donors. It said the 12-month deal with Lebec, a women-led strategy firm, had successfully delivered ‘successfully delivered against every single deliverable’. The spokesman added: ‘Lebec provided the positioning strategy, the tools, and the insights to enter the US market successfully and with credibility.’
However, further analysis of Chandauka’s tenure in charge of the charity, which began in July 2023, are limited because the financial accounts for 2024 have not been published. The latest publicly available financial accounts date from August 2023, which means Chandauka had only been chairwoman for one month when they were released. When asked by MailOnline when the next accounts would be published, Sentebale stated it will be in the third quarter of 2025.
The charity said its fiscal year had been adjusted to align with the calendar year resulting in the 2023/2024 annual report covering 16 months to align with a fundraising cycle in the US. Prince Harry and his co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, 58, alongside all five of the charity’s trustees, resigned last week rather than remain involved with Chandauka as chair.
As someone who’s been following this story very closely, I find it very interesting that there’s no consensus on the issue of “did the board approve of Chandauka’s consultant expenditures.” The former trustees are clearly telling media outlets that no board approval was given, but the now Chandauka-controlled Sentebale comms office keeps insisting that the board approved all of her expenditures (and she’s also bizarrely claimed that she raised money specifically to pay consultants??). This should be an easy thing to prove, unless Chandauka is doctoring the Sentebale documents. But even then, the former trustees will have their own records and their own memories of what they voted on and when they learned of these expenditures. The excuse for why the 2024 financial records are not available is also pretty f–king shady, and I hope the Charity Commission gets into that as well. Still, I don’t believe that a British commission will investigate everything in good faith. I still believe that Seesio and Harry will eventually have to sue Chandauka.
Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Sky News screencaps.
- The Duchess of Sussex presents the trophy to her husband, the Duke of Sussex after his team the Royal Salute Sentebale Team defeated the Grand Champions Team, in the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Duchess of Sussex presents the trophy to her husband, the Duke of Sussex after his team the Royal Salute Sentebale Team defeated the Grand Champions Team, in the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Duchess of Sussex presents the trophy to her husband, the Duke of Sussex after his team the Royal Salute Sentebale Team defeated the Grand Champions Team, in the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Duke of Sussex during the awards ceremony after he played in a polo match during the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Duke of Sussex during the awards ceremony after he played in a polo match during the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Duke of Sussex during the awards ceremony after he played in a polo match during the Royal Salute Polo Challenge, to benefit Sentebale, at The USPA National Polo Center Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke Of Sussex Where: Wellington, Florida, United States When: 12 Apr 2024 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
This woman is a charlatan
When even tabloids turn on you you know you are in trouble,
I full expected the tabloids would turn on her after her usefulness to talk sh*t about H&M were done. A few weeks later, they are gonna blame Harry for choosing her for the position.
Bound to, par for the course.
Oh, I totally expect them to destroy her by the time this is all over.. it’s just how they operate and to expect different is delusional..
And they will claim that this would not have happened if Harry had stayed in the royal family and the UK. They already started this.
I have an idea! The inevitable british movie about this can cast bad-wig Nana Akua (GB News) to play this Sophie. 🤣🤡
Can anyone say ” lawsuit” – Spending without board approval is going to get her in big trouble.
The Mail is in a tough spot, they’re racist so they can’t support the Black woman. But it’s Prince Harry and they can’t support him. That leaves them in the awkward position of reporting the facts.
😂
They’ll blame them both for Trump’s tariffs and tanking the world economy with Meghan’s flower sprinkles triggering the meltdown.
LOL! “That leaves (the Mail) in the awkward position of reporting the facts.” 😳😂🤣
Perfection!
And oh, how catching themselves in such a fork must be making them squirm!
Sometimes your fifteen minutes of fame really do last fifteen minutes. It’s going to be pretty bad when they fully drop her and she ends up tanking Sentebale and her own reputation. If she quits now she might still be able to gind work on GB News bullying Harry and Meghan.
Yeesh, she’s inspired the Fail to do some real journalism for once. 🤣🤣🤣
The report that the minutes have been tampered with, need to be explored by the CC. Falsifying records is an offence and the tome and confidence of the former trustees suggest they have their personal evidence of meetings and records. Sophie, OTOH, Is showing far from such confidence with her deflection of Meghan and Serena.
As for this
“Lebec provided the positioning strategy, the tools, and the insights to enter the US market successfully and with credibility.’”
Harry entered the US market successfully and his polo fundraising event raised the money required to allow Sentebale to continue its operations.
That sentence full of awful phrases “positioning strategy” “tools” “insights” are just deflection from the issue of the huge amount of money spent on this personally-connected Lebec and was in fact, de facto, a highly paid employee of Sentebale. I’d like to see an exact description of the “tools” she supplied Sentebale. There must be an expensive report as proof with her “tools” which seem to comprise a lot of verbosity.
And who is this Lebec anyway? Have Squaddies found out their connection? Through college or through Morgan Stanley?
“However, further analysis of Chandauka’s tenure in charge of the charity, which began in July 2023, are limited because the financial accounts for 2024 have not been published.”
🚩
“The latest publicly available financial accounts date from August 2023, which means Chandauka had only been chairwoman for one month when they were released.”
🚩🚩
Who are the auditors for Sentebale and did they change when Sophie became chair?
Interesting about the comments made of changes to her Wiki entry in her experience with “hostile takeovers.”
Sophie, you’re a volunteer board chair of a charity. You’re not on a NYSE/NASDAQ listed company eating a small firm. Nor are you in a family-owned business.
And from what I’ve read of the CC’s press release, reading between the lines they will investigate the mission pivot and the finances.
Sophie needs to educate herself in non profit board governance 101. The power is not 100% in the chair and I believe she’s exceeded the powers vested in her role which I’m sure – judging from the CC’s ruling on Captain Tom’s foundation – will very much look into her personal links and unmanaged conflicts of interest.
Harry’s success with other ventures shows he runs a tight, professional ship. Sophie sought to destroy one of his charities and she now has egg on her face. She’s in retreat and she needs to admit defeat soon because this won’t be healthy for her.
As for Rawlinson, how quiet he is now. Quaking in his boots over being interviewed by the CC? Will Mishcon represent him? 😂 Another example of the platinum standard of hires from the Palaces. 😏
Not sure how it works for the UK, but in the US there would be bylaws that set forth the specific powers of the Chair so it’s clear what s/he can and cannot do.
As a former nonprofit board chair myself, I would also expect to see some sort of provision in the governance docs about two signatures (and who those signatories are) on a material financial contract, which the Lebec contract would certainly be.
There should also be a board secretary that keeps the minutes, and the minutes should have been ratified by the board at the subsequent board meeting. This would all be memorialized in the board pack sent before each meeting so each board member would have a copy.
If there are dualing versions of the minutes… Sophie, you are f—-d.
A professional board would have all of that.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/charity-commission-guidance
NB the purpose.
So I would expect Sentebale’s constitution would have their rules for role of the Chair, CEO and trustees.
The CEO’s resignation was the big hint things weren’t well and they still haven’t got one.
My sympathies are with the former trustees who volunteered and were unpaid and had to put up with a nightmare. I’d like to think they tried to right the ship once the CEO left but the Chair thought and acted like an autocratic CEO instead – her interest conflicted with the interest of the mission of the charity.
So she can very well go down with the rudderless ship full of consultants she has created. Damn the mission of the charity.
Before I retired I was board secretary for a large organization in the education sector. We had an electronic board package system that guaranteed each president had an accurate, up to date version of the previous minutes. After each board meeting minutes would be circulated to all 24 college presidents for approval and the system was air-tight, nobody could fiddle with the information, and all expenditures were approved. This looks hella messy and just keeps getting worse and worse for “Call-Me-Doctor” Chandauka. She appears to be covering up or fiddling with a lot of incriminating information…this is going to end very badly for her.
Exactly. Typically there’s a threshold above which Board approval is required for an expense. There should be minutes, they’re normally signed, too. But it could be a case that the Board agreed to the overall strategic direction (use of consultants to pivot the fund raising strategy – which would actually not be odd), with the individual payments not exceeding the threshold where Board approval is required – added together however you can land on a total amount that far exceeds what the Board believed they had agreed to. Now, in this case good governance would normally lead the Chairman to at least inform the Board of what’s happening (even if formal Board approval is not required), plus organisations that are run normally would include quaterly financial reporting where these costs would appear. I’m wondering if that’s the bit that she did not disclose properly.
I said the other day that i wonder if the board didnt realize how much she was spending overall with nothing to show for it. Like maybe The 10k here, the 25k there was okay without approval, and then the board approved the 125k, and then at a board meeting they realized it was well over 400k and that was a problem since there was no funding to make up for that. And if she was part of the reason why ipsa honda left as a sponsor, that would have been a big issue too.
IIRC from when I was on the UKCC website briefly for Sentebale the other day, they had switched from an 8/31 fiscal year end to calendar YE in 2024. (?) You’d have to check me to confirm that. I had to click around a bit to find things… Normally in US with a change in reporting period, you’d expect to see full year, followed by short year (i.e. 8/31/23, 8/31/24, 12/31/24). But if they did actually change from FYE to calendar in 2024 and were allowed to have 16-month period – that could also add complexity.
A commenter below links to this article in Feminegra:
https://feminegra.com/sophie-chandaukas-sentebale-claims-vs-the-facts/
which is a great breakdown of the conflicts between Chandauka’s recent claims and the publicly-available timeline of events, plus her own prior statements.
They also provide receipts, including a previously published photo, of Chandauka’s ties to people she’s paid with Sentebale funds or appointed to the board, including her brother.
They don’t specifically show a direct prior tie to Lebec, but I’d bet good money that one will be revealed.
Re: Lebec – her prior position at water.org / WaterEquity (which I don’t totally get) would put her in proximity to enviro types like Willy and his buddy Iain Rawlinson. Maybe they were working on Sophie to pivot.
From a write up on Lebec’s LinkedIn it would seem Ian Rawlinson was the person who made the introduction
So did Rawlinson charge Sentebale £24,000 for his consultancy services for the intro? Or would that have been the £21,600 charged by Global Philanthropic where Rawlinson is chair and director? Of course there’s the mysterious £66,000 owed to Rawlinson, either personally or through his association with Rawlinson Partners? That’s before considering the levering up to Lebec…
In terms of governance, why is/was the chair of this charity making executive decisions? That is the role of the CEO. Governance 101 says the chair is supposed to provide independent, arms-length oversight, and not be involved in the day-to-day operations of the entity. I would suggest that charity commission also investigates whether she was incentivised in any way related to fund raising – i.e. that she got a ‘commission’ related to any funds brought in. If so, that is a clear violation of governance.
There should be minutes from the various Sentebale board meetings that show that the board approved these expenditures.
Isn’t one of the accusations from the former board members that she doctored the minutes? Or am
I imagining that I read that?
It was in one of the papers earlier this week. I was aghast when I read that on here.
All she had to do was just step down. Take the L and move on. She’s apparently the Drake of the charity world.
There is a personal vindictiveness in her that suggests a deeper issue which could also be Palace driven.
She sounds like a female version of Willie. More educated and more professional of course. But the bitterness is off the scale.
Time’s up Sophie. You’re not a dictator of a tinpot democracy.
If she cared about the charity, yes. Step down. Donors aren’t going to contribute to a charity with this much drama, not to mention the accusations of shady sh!t going on. She’s already lost Harry and another big donor. Obviously for her, it’s not about the charity.
Yeah, this is important – Harry stepping down doesnt just mean that Sentebale lost one of its founding patrons. It means it also lost someone who has consistently been one of its bigger donors. If he donated 1.5 million to the charity just after Spare (and thats what we know about), that means for that year he was probably its biggest donor, maybe the biggest for a few years.
Plus his draw as patron is huge. Even without the donations and the fact that he founded the charity, he is doing exactly what a patron should do – drawing attention to the organization through public appearances and events like the polo tournament. (take note other royals.)
His stepping down is a HUGE loss for the organization in more ways than one.
It has occurred to me that even after shafting the charity and bullying the former trustees, she may be clinging on to the charity in order for Prince Harry to PAY her to leave? After all, it is doubtful that she succeeded in scoring that £300,000 salary that she was attempting to grift from the former trustees, even after she replaced them. She miscalculated massively: she didn’t expect the princes to resign in solidarity with the board they knew and trusted, AND she didn’t expect them to actually welcome the Charity Commission’s investigation. I think she thought they would cave or try to bribe her long before things got this far – that’s one of the reasons she went on that lying spree in the British media and even the Financial Times (while avoiding any discussion of financial matters) to pile on the pressure, so now she has to bleat about how she’s a “whistleblower” who “felt” bullied by ONE patron’s resignation.
But yeah, she’s also got a massive ego AND may be using the time to cover her tracks.
Sophie probably needs time to cook the books.
Amy Bee, your reference to her possibly cooking the books brought pictures to my mind of jars of “Dr. Sophie’s Book Jam” with the slogan “Better Than Meghan’s”.
🤭
Whether or not the board approved the expenditures should be easy to prove as it should be noted in meeting minutes.
But checks of those sizes should have had multiple approvers.
An income of 3.4 million isn’t bad – except they spent over 3.7 million. I wonder if the alleged donation from Sophie’s family was to cover a shortfall or to pay for consultants.
About availability of financial records. The explanation makes sense if they’re talking about the audited annual report that they have to file with the Charity Commission. In the US, non-profits have 9 months after the end of their fiscal year to file their annual reports. But the actual accounting records – i.e. the books in house – should be available any time.
The charity is registered in the UK though and the new tax year begins in April.
The article says they changed their fiscal year to calendar year. I know it’s a UK charity – I was giving the US as an example, but in the UK charities have 10 months to file.
The blog feminegra claims Sophie hired her brother, Dr. Tinashe Chandauka, as a paid consultant. Apparently he listed this on his LinkedIn page but has deleted it. I don’t know what the source is for this claim, but if true it’s a really bad look.
https://feminegra.com/sophie-chandaukas-sentebale-claims-vs-the-facts/
At least one of the consultants is also a friend of her from one of the companies she worked at. She is definitely corrupt, handing the charity money to friends and family.
I read that too. Feminegra is really gunning for her and the writer is an historian. Good stuff.
If true, then it’s Sophie who turned Sentebale into a cronyist, nepotistic outfit.
I very much doubt her Nandi Life Sciences is going to market after all of this. I don’t know what respectable firm would ever hire her because she can’t seem to start her own business or charity successfully.
Visions of grandeur and power, alas, poor Sophie has failed.
Was Sophie calling herself Dr as part of promotion of Nandi Life Science? Before I’d read her wiki which disclosed it was just an honorary degree awarded by Coventry university I thought she was either a Medical or Academic doctor. It is unusual for someone awarded an honorary degree to then call themselves Doctor either personally or professionally. Obviously she’s entitled to list the honorary degree on her CV, LinkedIn and SM bio etc
Just adding this from the CC:
“Financial conflicts for a trustee happen if your charity is deciding whether to:
-pay the trustee for doing their trustee role (more than their expenses)
-employ or pay the trustee, or their relative, for some work at your charity, or its trading company…
Loyalty conflicts: These conflicts are not about money or other trustee benefits. They happen when, for other reasons, a trustee might not be able to make decisions that are best for the charity.
Some common examples
They can happen if the charity’s decision involves a person or organisation linked to a trustee. For example:
-the trustee’s employer
-another charity where they are a trustee
the organisation that appointed them as a trustee
-their relatives or friends
There can be a conflict because the trustee’s responsibility (or loyalty) to the other organisation or person could compete with their responsibility to the charity.”
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/managing-conflicts-of-interest-in-a-charity
Addresses Lebec and her brother.
Very interesting and closely researched. I think Sophie will get a lesson about the internet.
For a charity like Sentebale, the contacts for donors are supposed to come from the board. I had to laugh at the consultants saying all the targets were met for deliverables. Of course they were! Spinning up easily achieved and meaningless deliverables that sound good is consulting 101. We’ll have to see what private conversation was spun into “board approval” when the report comes out.
🎯
Let’s face it, the former trustees are well-connected, they attract discreet donors from BTS while the patrons’ presence at fundraising events add that incentive to donate.
What did Sophie bring to the table? Managerial experience at most? Her own personal donations? She managed to coast on her honorific titles but push came to shove, she failed upwards. Badly.
Her deepest links were consultant friends. They are hardly the type to donate to Sentebale.
Really the Squad should start petitioning that university to have her honorary doctorate removed – maybe after the CC findings.
This is one shady lady
I wonder if someone on “Oh No They Didn’t” will post this. Most likely not
When I saw the spending patterns for how this number got so high, it made a lot of sense that there was no ding ding ding! until now. Spending $40k-$70k spread out over various people over 18 months naturally helped diffuse scrutiny. And she probably did a brilliant job at snowing the board over financials.
This woman is finished. And she’s going to find out that PW’s friends aren’t going to stay her friends when she hits the skids and reaches out.
When did Ian Rawlinson start advising Sophie? Was it October or before then?
Formally or informally? We can only go by the amounts given to Rawlinson and his company, and his photos at Sentebale events.
I suspect he’s been there for awhile but now that he’s a CURRENT trustee appointed by Sophie, he has to account for his actions on behalf of the charity’s mission and purpose to the CC.
Willie will need to get rid of this man because he’s turning out to be like Michael Fawcett. But Willie likes his friends and rewards them like Knauf, so maybe he’ll appoint him to his Earthshit board if he has to resign from Sentebale.
Rawlinson should have remained in the shadows and not been a paid consultant (how was he introduced to Sophie?) nor accepted becoming a trustee. Not an effective clean up crew at all.
Didn’t think that far did you Willie?
He accompanied Sophie to the Sky News interview and she referred to him as her witness. He was prominently at her side in a very high profile interview acting as her consligere. He is well known for his association with FK such is public knowledge that callers into Jeremy Vine show automatically mentioned the link. Blatant provocation from both and rather odd behaviour from Iain who self describes as a mediator?? No doubt this mediator will tactfully suggest Will and Kate as new patrons for Sentebale as no one will turn a hair at such a development!!
@Lady Digby and oh yeah–the fact that Rawlinson charged them $77,000 is shameful. He’s undermining the organization as he takes tens of thousands of dollars from kids living with HIV/AIDS. A seat in hell has his name on it.
@Kirk if Lebec used her experience at Water Equity to fulfill her deliverables at Sentebale, how do water-related recommendations fulfill the charity’s mission and purpose?
The mission of the charity can’t be pivoted unless there’s a formal motion, meeting, approval for it etc. There would be a proper process involved for it, which clearly the trustees objected to.
And to go from HIV to water and climate change is one big pivot.
Oh dear. Sophie hired all these climate change consultants/friends/brother and the question will be asked – back to basics – how do they deliver services to the mission of Sentebale which is HIV?
She really should have started her own charity if she wanted climate change so badly – and putting aside Willie’s interference – this looks so awful for her. She not only comes across as arrogant but also ignorant of the charity’s purpose which she chairs. She should not have sat on it if she didn’t want to deal with HIV kids.
She previously sat as a trustee and it’d be interesting how many times she’d have brought up a climate change pivot in board meetings. If she didn’t, then the Palace-directed agenda is clear.
I also wonder why she didn’t take more interest in Travalyst which is Harry’s climate change company, but I suspect by that stage, Harry had the measure of her.
@Blogger – can’t really add to or argue with anything you’re saying. When I saw stuff about Sentebale expanding its focus last year, I didn’t think too much about it. But that was before we learned a sociopath (imho) had horned her way in. Travalyst would be a bad fit for her because the whole model is about getting travel industry business people to play nice and cooperate with each other in a “precompetitive” environment to achieve common frameworks that are readily understood by customers.
No, Will did not think that far ahead. He thinks he can take what he wants and thinks his media ties protect him. Or the media Harry is suing set this in motion and Will went along. They convinced him he could take it over. Everyone making these choices including Will are in a bubble of delusion and grandeur. All of em unaware the way things ran for the grandmother cannot exist in the landscape of personal technology and people that outwits media machinery /word speak. Playing chess to take over Sentebale instead of ignoring it and making earthshot, just.. better.. is hubris. As is the media trying to outsource pain to Harry to get him to split focus from the lawsuit.. hubris, de-lu-sion.
Shopie her hubris.. skill at convincing others she is good intentioned got her a great job, she could have utilized to help her side business endeavors- above board. Having Harry and Meghan as contacts -priceless- but IMO, she signed a deal to be a trojan and can’t backtrack or be outed by the ones who hired her. Sophie has scammed before IMO but in a capitalist business scamming is often a benefit to getting a better higher paid job. savvy. A charity though is not a business endeavor. I believe this is actually heartbreaking for the founders bc it is tied to their sense of love to someone who is so important to them. It would break someone honestly. TO have something that holds this much value in your heart be taken is too much for the brain.
I think the founders are processing enormous trauma this brought up and also have good lawyers and people around them to help them. I think they are not as traumaized by this as if this happened years ago. harry is in a better headspace and better equipped.
Will… Either make Earthshot a smaller sized charity like Sentebale with a mission to honor your mother or grow it like a business, except don’t be trying to outwit a brother who is not trying to outwit or harm anyone. Or start something new noodle. Think how would Harry do it? and then.. try that.
Will tried a takeover, Sophie was the trojan. Sophie will take the brunt as she should, that’s on her. And i think she has shafted and betrayed people before and this is the last time she will get away with it. And Harry will protect his assets now to ensure the children/charities are better protected from adults who f+++ about.
Those who are the go betweens, or set Sophie up, media [those harry is suing], palaces, Rawlinson really thought they had Harry, but seriously. Harry has the time, energy, and morals to keep documentation, conduct himself honorably and process trauma so he can make choices that are big picture. He has his family.
I think because Sentebale is two founders Harry , wasn’t, and it was begun ages ago, running it the way he runs Invictus, tight to protect from a takeover.
To me, it’s just the ruthlessness of Sophie and her lack of empathy. To take something so dear to someone without a care of the trauma is mind blowing. She called it a Vanity Project. She is cold and could careless about tbe impact to others.
The issue isn’t Lebec. They are a real business with a real invoice for services rendered. Where did the other half million go? To her friends & brother at the fraudulent Nandi Life Services? In her pocket? All that money & no results is highly suspicious.
Too busy jetting to high-end dinners & red carpets & not doing what they were PAID to do.
In addition, the income for 2023 was exceptionally high and amounted to 4.3 or 4.5 million, because Harry paid 1.5 million from Spare. The thought that she could have squandered that money, or part of it, makes me want to punch her.
Sentebale could publish interim financial accounts to cover the period between the transition from fiscal year to calendar year.
They’re stalling for time, possibly hoping donations would come in to cover all the financial shortfalls caused by mismanagement
I don’t know that they have to publish anything. The Commission could have someone come in to look at their books, couldn’t they? Or they could ask for receipts and invoices.
She reminds me of Trump and other grifters.
They never say it out loud – and most likely they won’t admit it – but it’s all “I had to break it down to rebuild it in my own image. And, it will be better! You’ve got to trust me on this.”
According to Lebec “Over the past year, our team at LEBEC has been honored to support Sentebale’s strategic growth as it evolves into a social enterprise with a lean and efficient business model and scales its impact in Southern Africa”.
Per Investopedia, “Funding for a social enterprise comes primarily from selling goods and services to consumers, with additional support through grants.”
Back to Lebec “Africa’s working age population will increase by 450 million over the next decade. …we need to act fast to tap into this potential.”
Why do I get the feeling that Sophie’s plan was to use the children of Sentebale for labor.
Sentebale’s strategic growth as it evolves into a social enterprise with a lean and efficient business model ?
Did the former trustees not agree with Sentebale changing from charity to social enterprise?
Wow. Is that from Lebec’s LinkedIn?
The Sentebale LinkedIn page looks like it was manufactured by Call-Me-Doctor before she discovered the original mission of providing support to youth affected by HIV-AIDS in Lesotho and Botswana.
@Kirk Yes
Someone somewhere said Rawlinson was the one who connected Chanduaka to Lebec’s consulting company. Alix Lebec seems very interesting & legit, but her Miami company seems more suited to larger charilties than Sentebale. This article about Alix has a couple of pictures related to Sentebale:
https://www.aup.edu/alumna/financing-transformation
Here’s the description under one photo:
“The LEBEC team . . . visiting Sentebale’s programs in Southern Africa. Co-founded by Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, Sentebale is a growing social enterprise providing access to critical health services, and education and entrepreneurship opportunities to underserved youth in Southern Africa. Through deep collaboration with government and local communities, Sentebale is enhancing health, wealth creation, and climate resilience in the region.”
A growing social enterprise? Providing entrepreneurship opportunities for underserved youth? Already enhancing wealth creation and climate resilience in the region?
This is really interesting, y’all.
Putting the pieces together from the last few comments here:
Hey, I know of a small Africa-based charity with a high profile, I used to sit on their board as a volunteer!
We could totally change course with it, no problem, if I went back in as board chair.
The population of African children coming of working age is going to be huge soon. We could use the existing charity funds to flip it into a business “creating wealth for young people” by giving them jobs, right?
And hey, Sentebale has been giving these kids medicine and support services for FREE. That’s such a white savior, colonizer thing to do. Obviously the kids should be WORKING to earn their medication and support! That’s teaching them how to fish instead of giving them fish, right??
And of course as the chair of what will now be a social enterprise business I should get paid a CEO-level salary, obviously.
What’s sexy with rich American liberals these days? Climate change! So let’s farm out these kids as contractors, to build solar panels or whatever. Investors will lap this crap up and beg for more, trust me!
What about Harry and Seeiso? They’re not going to love this idea.
We’ll push this through before they realize what’s going on. They’ll be too embarrassed and too emotionally invested in the Sentebale name to fight back, they’ll have to cave and support us. Right? Sure. Harry doesn’t need any more bad press and nobody cares about what Seeiso thinks anyway. And if they distance themselves, great, we can get Prince William to step in as patron!
Narrator:
And then the whole thing blew up in her face and she started throwing any shit she could think of, egged on by Rawlinson shilling for BillyIdle.
… Ok I just wrote a whole little one-act play in my head, whew! 😳
Very well-written, Idles at Cranky. Let’s just hope it is fiction!
Thanks for this piece of levity.
The pressure they put on the Sussexes in general is unconscionable.
I hope Harry and Seeiso are out somewhere together enjoying their time. They’ve set up a remarkable charity which lasted two decades and had a palpable impact. Who’d have thought it would have such a reach when they first established it? Not too many can say that.
Cheers to you gentlemen! 🥂
Sophie may already be staffing Sentebale with people who are loyal to her. The new country director was placed in that position in December and commented “While Trustees are a key for governance and regulation, and patrons – especially Founders are an honour to have, it’s the people in the field who are advancing the work no matter what.”
This seems a bit of shade to the founders, especially the one who brings in the funds which help pay the salaries of those on the ground. Harry is not Kate and William showing up once a year for 15 minutes and contributing nothing.
That crazy, vindictive woman and her friends/family members involved should be tried for embezzlement.
I found this at the Sentebale site:
“Examples of Sentebale’s interventions with children and young people include:
Teaching critical life skills that build confidence and lead to success.
Vocational training, career exploration and entrepreneurship for young women to build career paths that contribute to a future that is more equal.
Providing inclusive services to address mental and physical wellbeing.
Working with youth and families on understanding the changing natural environment, and how their livelihoods can adapt.
The holistic care of young people living with HIV/AIDS, including psychosocial support. ”
Maybe they have been (mis)using big concepts like climate change and wealth inequality to describe smaller, practical aspects of helping children of Lesotho and Botswana? AIDS care, physical & mental wellbeing, life skills, livelihoods that will adapt to climate change–all sound reasonable for what the founders wanted to do.
After all, this is what Senebale has always been doing. Harry personally carried the boards to build another general development center, encompassing all of this. After all, Senebale’s activities have never been limited to administering medications, but also concerned working on their development and future. And your quoted fragment sounds as if taken straight from the programs that Meghan implemented with women in London.
Chanfakery has had over a year and a half to effect changes to the website. With or without board approval.