I’m starting to think Matthew Goode is one of the biggest bitches working in Hollywood today. It’s kind of funny what he gets away with, probably because he has a cute British accent and he’s kind of hot, in that impossibly pasty and posh way some British men are. But the man is an ingrate, a tool and a total bitch, bless his heart. There are so few of us left! Before I get into Matthew’s latest verbal faux pas, let me recap one of the greatest moments in the history of film promotion.
The story is this: Goode was cast as Andrew Veidt/Ozymandias in last year’s Watchmen. As soon as he was cast, the fanboys went into revolt, publicly bashing Goode’s casting. When Goode was asked about the fanboy revolt, he reportedly said: “The negative feedback is relayed by my friends. I think the fanboys aren’t particularly happy – there are a load of people they’d have rather had in before me. It’s already being slated before they’ve seeing anything. But if fanboys still hate the film after going and seeing it, they can all line up and suck my d-ck. I don’t give a f-ck. I’m having a child and that’s more important to me – so I don’t give a f-ck. Grow a d-ck.” Ha! This is how he talks to fans!
After the “grow a d-ck” fiasco, you would expect studio publicist to be wary of putting a journalist’s microphone anywhere near Goode. But his last film, A Single Man, was critically lauded and award-nominated, so maybe the publicists thought Goode could handle himself on the Leap Year publicity trail. Not so much. By the way, Leap Year is that film that your mom wants to see. Amy Adams is the charming American girl traveling to Ireland to propose to her boyfriend on (you guessed it) February 29. Goode isn’t her boyfriend – he plays the roughneck who she hires to drive her somewhere. And they fall in love! So, yeah, it’s going to be a cheesefest. But does this excuse Goode for calling his own film “turgid”? Oh, he also bitches about A Single Man’s promotion and his part in Brideshead Revisited. He literally has no internal monologue:
There was a time, says Matthew Goode, when actors were free to speak their minds, when agents and PRs didn’t control the film industry and it was a lot less bland as a result. I can see a wistful gleam in his eye as he says this and it’s plain this is a time he hankers after – and indeed is on a one-man mission to recreate.
Certainly, it’s hard to think of any other actor who says of his last film, the romantic comedy Leap Year, that ‘it’s turgid’. And, what’s more, that, ‘I just know that there are a lot of people who will say it is the worst film of 2010.’ Possibly he will be carted off in the middle of the night shortly after this interview and re-emerge with his lips sewn together, but for the moment, at least, he seems to be doing very well.
Goode on A Single Man: At first he “found the scenes a little banal.” But when he sat down with the film’s writer/director, fashion designer Tom Ford, he came to see that this banality was deliberate.
On A Single Man’s promotion: After criticising the distributors for putting co-star Julianne Moore’s face on the poster instead of his – thereby implying it was a heterosexual romance – he weighed into the film’s producers, Harvey and Bob Weinstein, for not doing enough to sell it: ‘It doesn’t seem to be getting a push from the Weinsteins too much.’
On how he really feels about the Weinsteins: ‘Do you honestly think I wanted to pick a fight with Harvey Weinstein? To be honest, I’ll know how serious this is when A Single Man premieres over here. He’ll be over for that so we’ll see. He’s a lovely man, though,’ he says, grinning all the harder now. ‘I did get told I would have my wrist slapped as a result, but I didn’t even know about the article.’
On his role as Charles Ryder in Brideshead Revisited: ‘I got f-cked over,’ he says disarmingly. ‘By the script and by what happened with everything else, because there was just nowhere for me to go as the character. I don’t think it necessarily helped that Ben [Whishaw, who played Sebastian Flyte] went down the path of making it so…’ Goode breaks off – but when I say ‘Dour?’, he does not demur. ‘Still, you know, it’s a film. It’s fine. I can sleep at night now. But I do think that Julian [Jarrold, the director] should have given Sebastian to me. It was perfectly amicable, but I think maybe they’d banked on me becoming a bit bigger as a result of the film – and it didn’t really work out that way.’
On his epic indiscretion: ‘Because of the way my repartee comes out, people tend to think that I don’t care. Actually, it’s often just a result of my being in a situation where I’m embarrassed about having to talk about a film which I don’t think is that brilliant – but obviously I can’t say that. All right… I do think that it’s important that one should be able to speak out without worrying about causing offence, or whatever. And it saddens me that the romanticism has been ripped out of being an actor.’ You mean the raciness, the bad behaviour? ‘Exactly! It wasn’t like that in Peter O’Toole’s time, was it? Maybe that’s what I love.’
On getting paid: ‘Some actors go, “Bing!” and suddenly they’re being paid huge sums. Me, I seem to get screwed every time. It’s a lot better than it was, but people have this odd idea that I must be a millionaire who swans around accepting roles whenever I care to. I’m very much a jobbing actor who’s still trying to find a place to rent down the road.’
On not moving to America: ‘If I lived in LA, I’d be schizophrenic after a week. I’d just sit in a hotel room with a shoebox full of weed going: “I’m not f-cking moving. If they want me, they can come here”.’
On how he‘s ashamed he did Leap Year: ‘That was the main reason I took it – so that I could come home at the weekends. It wasn’t because of the script, trust me. I was told it was going to be like The Quiet Man with a Vaughan Williams soundtrack, but in the end it turned out to have pop music all over it. A bit like Chasing Liberty again. Do I feel I let myself down? No. Was it a bad job? Yes, it was. But, you know, I had a nice time and I got paid.’
[From The Telegraph]
If Goode didn’t want to make a cheesefest romantic comedy, why the f-ck did he sign on and cash the checks? That’s what I hate about actors who bash their own films. Some will applaud their honesty, but I think it’s disrespectful and unprofessional. If you don’t want to do something as an actor, don’t do it. If you do the work, however, sack up and promote the sh-t and, oh I don’t know, ACT like it’s good. That’s your job.
Matthew Goode at the London premiere of A Single Man on February 1, 2010, and at the BAFTA nomination announcements on January 21, 2010. Credit: WENN.
It’s your responsibility dude.
You’re lucky you’re working, considering your questionable talent.
I think I’m in love. *swoons*
Maybe he can star in a movie with Katherine Heigl, and then the two of them can bash it together.
He has always seemed to be the biggest douche to me so im not surprised.
So why did he sign up for that “crap fest”then? Geeze nobody made him sign on the dotted line. Except maybe the dollar signs.
It is a pity when actors slag off their films because a lot of people worked really hard on whatever outcome is. Anyway Leap Year cannot possibly be as bad as Love Happens (Aniston and Eckhart). As for his “grow-a-d*ck” comments, yes, totally unprofessional but kind of funny and natural in a defensive, take-your-criticism-and- shove-it manner – a pretty typical human response. However most of us keep that to ourselves, aye?
just look at his face, he obviously is a bitch. no quotes needed to realize that.
Meh. Much ado about nothing. Goode hasn’t said anything about Leap Year that other people already haven’t.
I LOVE him. *sigh* I have for years.
Also, I love the fact he says what he thinks, rather than what he thinks others want to hear.
Leap Year is the only movie that I have ever walked out of. True story.
He looks totally drunk in the heading photo. Maybe his suck my d*ck comments were the alcohol talking. Not to excuse it, but rather explain it.
Who is this man?
He’ll end up like Rupert Everett if he doesn’t watch out. Whining because he no longer has a career. No one will want to work with him anymore.
Nice…And he’s a father too? Wow, I’d beam with pride if my father was that catty and foul mouthed, who wouldn’t?
You are exactly right Raven. He will. In this, or really any other, business do not bite the hand that writes your check you dimwit. Be grateful when you are getting paid to ACT. You could just as easily be a waiter.
@Raven – Rupert Everett kept popping into my head, too. Same thing happened with F. Murray Abraham. Now they blame everything other than their verbal diarrhea for their inability to get work.
I have a feeling that Goode’s career will be hitting a wall. Box office draws are allowed to get away with a lot of crap, but actors in Mr. Goode’s position don’t have that luxury.
This is the guy they want to play Bilbo Baggins in the Hobbit remake? Doesn’t seem like a good choice to me.
Link to article:
http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2010/02/23/35322-matthew-goode-auditions-for-bilbo-baggins/
Pretty face and bad character…
There was a time, says Matthew Goode, when actors were free to speak their minds, when agents and PRs didn’t control the film industry and it was a lot less bland as a result.
I’d really like to know what time he means. Back in the early days of Hollywood, studios practically owned stars. They would give them a new name and rewrite their history to seem more interesting. They were far more controlled and groomed in a pre-TMZ world, that much is certain. What a dummy.
Doesn’t he sort of look like Milo Ventimiglia (sp?)?
I have no idea who this person is and I’ve never seen anything with him in it, and I don’t think I ever will, just because!!
I totally agree with Raven . . . he will end up exactly like Rupert Everett, unable to even get a part in a TV show. Believe me, the people who make the movies are taking note of this person and it won’t be long before he will be begging for roles.
P.S.: I’ve heard of “Watchman” but was it a hit? And “Brideshead Revisited” was done many years ago for Masterpiece Theatre (back when they did great stuff) and it was wonderful. Did this fool not see that and know that it would be “dour”? It wasn’t written to be a funfest!!
ick. feminine face, weak chin, wet eyes. and a bitch. not my type.
He is totally hot and Leap Year did SUCK. Seriously it was so bad, so very bad.
what’s the issue? he took a job but is unhappy with the way the film turned out. i’m sure the producers aren’t too happy to hear it, but he has every right to criticize his own work. i’ve heard many a film actor say that they regretted having made one film or another..it’s not so unusual.
As far as the “grow a dick” comment, that wasn’t directed at HIS fans, but the fans of the Watchman, who were upset with the casting choice (personality aside, it was a good choice).
I can understand where he’s coming from, even though he said it poorly. Everyone though Watchmen was going to be bad film (same thing they did with Avatar), so the fanbase judged him before the film even came out.
He’s still a young guy, who needs a better PR machine.
Well, it’s still early, but Leap Year will definitely make the top ten list of worst movies of 2010.
He was horrible as Adrian (typo on your part) in Watchmen, his hybrid American-British or whatever he is accent threw me off so much … does this mean I can suck his cock?
@ Rachel, as long as Valentine Day is the #1 bad movie of 2010, with The Bounty close behind!!!
What is the problem with speaking your mind? He thinks the film he made was shit, so what, sometimes I feel that way about my own work.
I don’t think he is disrespecting the producers of the film, I mean he is ridiculing himself in the process.
Seems like there’s always someone like this – just starting to hit real success in Hollywood, and feels they have to trash everyone and everything that got them there to make themselves seem rebellious. See Megan Fox for current female example.
I think you can be honest about lesser quality films without being an a-hole. And given all the people really struggling right now, I think it’s pretty lousy to whine about a job you willingly took and got paid a lot of money to do.
What a shame! I loved him in Match Point and found him charming in Brideshead Revisited. He always looks like such a sweetheart in his movies. That’s a pretty bad picture of him, he is much hotter than that. He may not be getting the plum roles and salaries he thinks he should get but I’m willing to bet he’s still making more than most doctors and lawyers. How disappointing to hear what’s actually on his mind. He should consider himself lucky to have found some success especially since for every one actor, there are millions out there hoping to have his success.
Leap year is utterly shameful tripe, he SHOULD be redfaced.
He should be allowed to speak his mind. Anyone else see the irony in these comments being extremely bitchy criticizing some else being bitchy?
Hers how to bitch: He is hot but could be much hotter. Hit the gym Matthew. His naked ass in Brideshead was formless.
Still i’d hit that. Anita, you’ll have to pull me off it. 😉
I don’t think people are complaining that he is bitching about a movie he made; people are bitching because it is RUDE to bitch about a movie you made. It is disrespectful to the other people who worked on the movie. At the very least he should wait a few years and when an interviewer asks him what movies he regrets being in, he can tell them. Now is not the time. His remarks make him look mean and ungrateful. If he keeps this up he never will see the top salaries that other actors are getting.
I love love love The Watchmen. Ive seen the move and read the graphic novel and I thought Matthew Goode did a wonderful job with the character.
I second what Oh Hey said. He was telling the fanboys to suck the peen, not his actual fans.
I dont know about his other movies but its probably not a good idea to speak poorly of your own work.
I’m in the minority (especially when you forget it’s based on the book) but I loved Brideshead. It was a beautiful film.
However Goode really has no room to speak. He’s not a huge actor, he’s not doing himself any favors and guess what most actors have to do one cheesy romcom once in their career. Get over it. His work also isn’t anything special. Let’s see I;ve seen him in Watchmen, Match Point, Imagine Me and You, Chasing Liberty and Bridshead, that’s not exactly a stellar resume. He’s not exactly Robert DeNiro. If it weren’t for the voice and the fact that he’s okay looking I doubt he’d ever get any work.
In fact I’m almost hoping he fails miserably. Wouldn’t amaze me if 10 years from now he’s showing up in low budget British films shown on BBC3 on a weekday with only a handful of the British public being able to name him on face recognition alone. It’s exactly what he deserves. No one’s going to want to put up with his crap because there are dozens of British actors looking to make it in Hollywood. Good riddance!
And for the folks defending him he didn’t have to take any of those roles. If he’s so passionate about his craft he’d be living on the dole, and only taking those great theater roles. I’m guessing he’s not as great as he thinks he is, hence his less than spectacular film career.
I saw him in Imagine You and Me. He’s pretty and charming in that Hugh Grant, “Aren’t I pretty and charming?” way. When he had to take a dramatic turn, he didn’t do well at all, I think. Also, he’s not criticizing HIS performance in the movies, but the movies themselves. Surely that is unprofessional, especially since the movie he bashes is still in the movie theaters now. I bet if he were getting a percentage of the profits, he’d be singing a far different tune. A lightweight, and a whiny, obnoxious one at that. I do object to the Rupert Everett comparisons, though. Rupert has done a lot of good work for years. He’s genuinely talented, witty, intelligent, funny, handsome, etc. He writes hilarious books, too. Rupert may be a bitch, but he brings it and he’s wonderfully entertaining (a la Oscar Wilde). The Goode bitch reminds me more of Noel and Liam Gallagher: entitled, narcissistic, arrogant, etc. Rupert has class.
I still love that man! And yes, I am a little ashamed of myself.
Who? What?
Why is one of his eyes so much bigger than the other?!?!?
Gay.
Everything he says is true. He’s funny and he’s refreshing.
His eyes aren’t hooked-on right.
Actors don’t decide how a movie is edited, and he is not the first to complain about the final product. He is entitled to his opinion, just like the rest of us!
I want to give this guy the benefit of the doubt here. I think he is a decent actor and very attractive. He is all about the art and he wants to do serious roles. He now has a growing family which would make anyone worry about the salary and so if he is complaining about salary its his right. I know the Sunday Times Quote’s Kaiser so…I would suggest Kaiser to go a little bit easy on Goode. Repeating anything he might have said about Harvey Weinstein is not fair. Nevertheless, this is NOT the NY POST but a ‘Gossip Column’ so most things in theory is NOT FACT BASED…that is why its called GOSSIP. I am a fan of Kaiser but she can lay into many A List Celebs she choose a D-listed Brit with no real Agent Power. I think that is very mean.
He is unremarkable in everyway.
I think all of his comments were well backed up by the total context of his statements. The media tends to emphasize the most controversial statements as if they stand alone. I like having intelligent frank conversations like that and besides, he’s not a “product” owned by the studios or fans for that matter. He has a right to tell “his” perspective. I would be more concerned by some comments that might be withheld by actors who only want to be liked. There could be some dark things lurking there.
I shouldn’t be commenting as I’m on holiday, but I couldn’t resist.
Haha. Typical aries. I was wondering when the dick was going to come out swinging. I’m in the minority here. It’s painful to watch actors in interviews when it’s obvious that they couldn’t give a flying fuck about the film their doing. They grow tired of doing the same insipid interviews and I grow tired of the same banal comments. “Oh, he was lovely to work with…” I do actually applaude him for his honesty. Furthermore, an actor can sign onto a movie with the best of intentions, but it is more than the actor that makes the film. You’ve got the director, writers, editors, set designers, etc. If any one of them is a weak link, it will ruin the film. An actor can sign onto a project expecting it to be Silence of the Lambs and ends up getting the Hitchhiker.
I thought he was mediocre at best as Adrian. Especially when compared to the phenomenal Jackie Earle Haley.
CB Rawks: 😆
I may be in the minority, but I didn’t hate Leap Year. Granted it’s formulaic and cheesy, but I almost hate to admit that I found it entertaining. And Goode was charming.
i think its funny you hate this guy yet give ricky gervais a pass because “hes a comedian”. gervais has said worse things yet you brush it off as “hes obviously joking” when you really dont know. how about you guys at celebitchy be a bit more consistent when it comes to the hate ok?
The thing about actors bashing a movie they just released is that it ruins the PR. Sure, the critics never like a rom-com, but people are still willing to pay for it. But when the lead says it’s bad…well, it makes it harder to buy their acting in it. And perhaps someone out there who would have loved the film (for their own reasons) won’t go see it.
I have no objections to an actor looking back 5…10 years and saying “well, we take some films for the paycheck” or “maybe that one was a mistake” but bashing it as soon as the film comes out? You just look like an uppity b*tch IMO.
Smacks of a Rupert Everett obsession. Advice: This attitude didn’t eventually work out well for R.E., guy.
I can’t imagine why any moviegoer would want to be lied to and told that a film is wonderful and to think that it’s an actor’s job, to promote shit with a smile, that that is the “professional” thing to do. This says more about an infantile dumbed-down audience than the actor not being gracious or doing his job.
you forgot he’s pretty bad actor too.
just watched leap year and he was pretty horrible in it. just got a cute face nice bod but zero talent and character.
I think this is a very biased article where the author has obviously cherry-picked comments that portray Matthew Goode in a bad light and ignored the context and the tone with which they came. As someone said above, the media likes to select key quotations to give the slant they want and if you were to actually watch the whole interview then it would make a lot more sense and probably not read so rudely.
Goode has a very British, oddball sense of humour that, perhaps, doesn’t swing with everyone but is very refreshing and amusing to a lot of others. If you read/watched an entire interview then you would see what a quick-witted, charming and genuinely nice guy he is. There isn’t anything fake about him. Not like hundreds of other A-List celebs.
He has done what he has to do to get a pay cheque and he hasn’t slated every film that he’s been in, just the bad ones. And why shouldn’t he get a say? He didn’t slam Matchpoint or Lookout, did he? They were actually good films.
Besides, to those of you saying that he’s a godawful actor, well, he wouldn’t be getting good reviews would he from actual critics that know what they are talking about. Although his films are criticised, he rarely is which proves that he has talent and it IS the films letting him down.
He’s British and a Bad Boy! What more could you want? I personally love that he is protective of financially taking care of his family. He haS A NO-NONSENSE personality. I like him! Bravo, Mr. Goode! yum-yum
first of all, i didn’t think leap year was that bad. a predictable chic flick? sure. but i love those movies and the film industry has to appeal to all audiences. an up-and-coming actor has to take whatever roles are offered in order to make his talent known. he doesn’t have to like them. if he hears bad feedback, it’s human nature to let people know they agree. i think it’s sad that people pick apart an actor’s looks and talent because they don’t care for their personality. it’s immature. being in the spotlight offers a lot of opportunity to say or do something they might regret and can’t take back. i think matthew is very talented. every character he plays is completely different. he is working his way up and looking for a real challenge. his honesty is refreshing.
personally i love the LEAP YEAR. its a feel good movie and its romantic with Irish countryside as the background. Matthew is a lovely actor. He can do better. which i think frustrates him that better roles dont come his way much. His role in The Lookout was different. Its great acting from him there. His role in Match Point is not so profound. I’m glad he got the main role in Brideshead. Give the guy a break. Hope he does well in whatever projects offered to him in future.
For the moment it seems that Goode is mainly given parts due to his good looks. It will take some effort and a bit of luck for him to get parts that shows off more versitility. He is not doing himself a favour bashing the films he has been in, and I also think his judgement is not always correct. Even though Leap Year may have been a rather classical Romantic Comedy, it did show off his acting skills. It might not always be such a blessing to be SO goodlooking, but I certainly appreciate it…