Well, as everyone predicted, the royal-sycophant industry is going like gangbusters since Prince William and Catherine “Not So Waity Katie Now, Bitches” Middleton announced their engagement on Tuesday. Do you know how powerful, how agile, how prepared the royal-sycophant industry is? Crazily so. I was shocked on Tuesday morning how many “royal correspondents” and “royal experts” came out within minutes of the announcement. It’s like there’s some kind of Royalist BatPhone that connects straight into the cave that holds Piers Morgan and Kitty Kelly and Tina Brown. Anyway, People Magazine got an “exclusive” with Kitty Kelly, who is basically just theorizing about what could happen at the wedding. Meanwhile, people (“royal watchers”) are saying that Will and Kate spent most of Wednesday in high-level wedding talks with Buckingham Palace. Here’s more from People:
Prince William and fiancée Kate Middleton are suddenly knee deep in wedding planning. And like your average commoners, it sounds like they’ll be fielding friendly advice from just about everyone.
In a statement on Wednesday, his office said: “Prince William and Miss Middleton have spent the morning in meetings with Household staff about the wedding. An announcement about venue and date will be made in due course after other Members of the Royal Family, Mr. and Mrs. Middleton and the Government have been consulted.”
Of course, unlike your average commoners, William and Kate’s decisions about their big day are eagerly anticipated by literally billions of people. While we wait, let’s break down some of the possibilities.
When will it happen? July 8 is said to be a favored date, but July 29 is a strong possibility, too, as that is the 30th anniversary of William’s mother Diana’s marriage to Prince Charles.
Where will it happen? The couple have said London, which likely means either St. Paul’s Cathedral or Westminster Abbey. The former is where Charles and Diana married in 1981. The latter holds sad memories for William, as his mother’s funeral was held there in 1997.
Who will be the best man? Almost certainly William’s brother, Prince Harry.
What does the engagement ring signify? “The whole world knows it was Princess Diana’s engagement ring, and even though her marriage to Will’s father turned out to be so abysmal, there was so much hope and happiness in the beginning,” Kitty Kelley, author of The Royals, tells PEOPLE. “If his mother were alive, she’d probably give him that ring to give to this young woman.”
What titles will the couple have? There are only a few prominent titles left. These are the dukedoms of Clarence, Cambridge and Sussex. None of these have any distinct connection to William, but they are senior titles and would be “eminently suitable,” according to a heraldry expert.
Is it okay to marry a commoner? “It’s the 21st century,” says Kelley. “I know that the British press is making a lot out of that. … I think it’s very hurtful. I think the story has worn itself out, and it should wear itself out.”
What will Kate do for work? She has said she is looking forward to making a “difference,” adding: “I’m willing to learn quickly and work hard.” Like all royals, she will gradually build up patronages that match her interests. She already supports the Starlight charity, which helps terminally and severely ill children, and is “winding down” her current work with her parents’ party supply business.
Will the public embrace Kate? “She is the wife of Princess Diana’s first-born son and the heir to the throne,” Kelley says. “Oh, I think there will be great goodwill extended towards her.”
Could the reign ever pass over Charles to William? “No. No. Never,” Kelley says. “The only way is if Charles found himself under a bus and run over and it would pass from the Queen to Wills. There are a lot of people who would like to see it that way, but it won’t happen that way.”
Will this wedding help the Royal Family? “I do think the marriage will reboot the monarchy,” says Kelley. “Many in England are getting sick of footing the bills of the Royal Family. There’s a small movement that wants to demolish the monarchy. This wedding will help them because this will bring a lot of goodwill to the monarchy.”
[From People]
My favorite of all of the royal watchers/experts/reporters/sycophants, The Mail’s Katie Nicholl says that she wouldn’t be surprised if the wedding date was earlier than June or July. She thinks it could even be as soon as April. We’ll see on that one. Oh, and Kate was seen at Westminster yesterday – so chances are pretty good that that’s the locale for the wedding.
What else… oh, apparently, Princess Diana’s ring didn’t even have to be resized for Kate. It fit perfectly! And this blue dress that Kate wore for her whirlwind announcement and stuff? It’s from the label Issa, which is Kate’s favorite, and which she wears often. Some people think Issa’s designer, a Brazilian living and working in the UK named Daniella Issa Helayel, will be asked to do the wedding dress. I’m not so sure – Issa is a solid label for the girlfriend of a prince, for sure. Not so much for a princess, and not for her wedding day. In the past, Kate has worn Issa’s simple, easy (budget Gucci?) silhouettes, and she always looks nice, but she looks like she picked out some nice dresses at a mall – for real. Kate has a reputation as a conservative dresser, but I’d just like to point out that many of the dresses she chooses would look totally trashy on a girl with bigger boobs – lots of low-cut, clingy silk jersey and loud, bright colors that Kate only looks “conservative” in because she’s slender and has a small bust. I really hope Kate picks out a more traditional designer for her wedding gown.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
For some reason part of me is sad to see Diana’s ring on someone else. I’ll always associate the ring with Diana. It just “looks” wrong on another finger.
It’s just a ring, and an ugly one at that.
if the brits are sick of footing the bill for the monarchy how will an expensive taxpayer funded wedding “reboot” the monarchy?
Not thrilled at all. And my UK friends couldn’t care less, except for the fact that taxpayer money is going towards it in this economy. None of them is looking forward to the ceremony. Quite sad, really, as I am (perhaps was?) a monarchist, but William and Kate are pretty boring.
It’s good to see that ring. Somebody on another blog called it “the most important piece of jewelry in the world,” though I would correct that. It’s the most important piece of jewelry to royal-watchers.
LOL the only people that seriously want a republic here are that “Republic” group who are as redundant as “Liberty” who always get interviewed by the papers but only have like 3000 members lol…
I think the taxpayers would rather pay for a Royal wedding which will be a big celebration for the whole country rather than a load of greedy MP’s scrounging TV’s and cheating mortgages etc
It is utterly appalling that one cent of taxpayer money will go toward their wedding. Let the Windsors pay for the wedding out of their gazillions; Brits have enough “austerity” coming without adding this insult to injury. I find it amazing that there are still sappy monarchists out there willing to foot their exorbitant bills.
I don’t think “all” or even “a lot” of British taxpayers are going to hate paying for this wedding. I think they are smart enough to understand that (1) all of the hoopla will bring in more money for their economy than will be going to pay for the wedding; and (2) a wedding is great fun and they wouldn’t want their future King to marry his future Queen at the local registry!!
Sure there are people who will complain about the cost, just as people in America complained about the cost of the presidential inauguration and State Dinners but it’s something that has to be and, really, it doesn’t cost that much. Just relax and enjoy it and think of all the PR Britain will be getting for their tourist industry.
Also, I think Kate looks lovely in that blue dress. It was perfect for her: the color and the shape of the dress. I have no idea who is going to design the wedding dress but I do remember that the designers of Diana’s gown (David and Elizabeth Emmanuel) were totally unknown to the masses and they did a very good job. I don’t think the fact that this Issa person is not a top name will rule her out as the wedding gown designer. In fact,it might work in her favor. Obviously Kate likes this designer and that’s all that counts really. Designing this wedding gown could turn Issa into a top designer, just look at what designing Michelle Obama’s inaugural gown did for Jason Wu!! I hope Issa gets the assignment!!
Needs moar Harry!
Everything needs moar Harry, tbh!
I’m genuinely curious, if someone knows the answer, as to why they need to be given another title. Isn’t it enough to be prince and princess? Why do they also need to be duke and duchess? How does that work?
Ella I agree completely!
The press is all over this story, why are they news I would like to know, Prin.Diana’s son, the girl friend is so, so wearing big hats that looks really silly these hats are way to big for her face, still trying to figure out why I should care about her dress or they engagement the press is something else, they dump people on us Sarah Palin, the Gosslins, now these people don’t they realize that most people are in an economic quagmire we just don’t have time to care about rich people’s lives.
fuck it – good for her. what else is there
In business school, the whole British Royal Family Business would have been considered a strong income generating assert with a ‘halo’ effect for the rest of the little country. The family still generates more income for the country than they cost the taxpayer.
Sadly, the Royal Family and their country’s glorious history is the primary export the UK has left to sell. But, that said, the average Brit is typically an asset to any project.
Hah! In that ring close-up you can totally see all of the foundation and makeup on Kate’s hand. Seriously, her regular, naked hand wouldn’t suffice? She’s 28, for pete’s sake! It’s not like her hands would have age spots or look like Madonna’s or anything…
No Issa wedding dress, please. They look like cheap silk.
Kaye: With immediate, senior male members of the royal family, it is customary to give them a Dukedom when they marry. Andrew became Duke of York, one of the most prestigious titles there is. Edward did not want a dukedom and became Earl of Wessex. Whichever one William is given, it will be temporary. When he becomes Prince of Wales (when Charles becomes king) he will also inherit the Duke of Cornwall title and all the revenue from the Duchy of Cornwall, which I understand is quite considerable. This is all just royal tradition, nothing more.
I think we will all start to hear lots of grumbling about how much this whole thing is going to cost from the British taxpayers. It has already begun.
Beh, I bet they get married closer to spring than summer. His birthday is June 21st, his mother would have been 50 on July 1st, the anniversary of her death is August 31st and if Katie has half a brain she will NOT want to get married on July 29th, the anniversary of his divorced parents. Fall or winter would be nice for a change. As for the venue, both have bad karma, the ill-fated wedding in one and the funeral in the other. Time to think about eloping to Vegas.
I’ve seen this several times since the announcement, so I have a question.
Why Catherine with a “C” and not Katherine with a “K?”
Kate, Katie or Kathy is short for Katherine. Catherine would have Cate, Cathy, and Caty…right? Why is everyone switching letters all of a sudden? 🙂 I didn’t watch any interviews. Did I miss a formal announcement?
I really hope they don’t pick july 29. That would just be asking for it. Really???
Other than that, I cannot wait to see what all they decide to do. I love Kate’s fashion–but I hope she picks a different designer for her dress.
St. Paul’s Cathedral would be lovely, and I hope they pick July 8th. This is about them, not Diana.
Abby, I have been wondering the same thing. Has the press been spelling her name wrong (Kate instead of Cate) for the past 9 years?
@City Girl to Country Girl: I read a few years back that apparently none of her family or friends have ever referred to her as ‘Kate’. But that it was more of a tab creation that just kind of stuck. Hence why the letters are all weird.
And yea, while some may argue that they don’t want to have to pay for the wedding, in all honesty 1) the royals are one of the biggest (if not the biggest) tourist draw to England 2) the amount of merchandise that is already being made will totally bring a big boost to their economy as well.
I would march directly to John Galliano of Dior. He is british and the dress would be modern and gorgeous. He is also the designer of the dress that I though matched the bride better than anyone else in history…Gwen Stefani and the dress she wore. He hand painted that dress. No one else in the world could have worn it.
I think he would do new Princess and Westminster Abbey perfectly well, BTW the Queen of England, Elizabeth II was married at Westminster. Fine company.
I think it was sweet he gave her his mother’s ring but I don’t think the ring is very pretty. I love a diamond any day of the week.
who knows what her official birth name and used first name have in common or not. I know a girl whose first name is very different from her birthnames (her first name used in everyday life was a mash up of the first syllables of her three given names: ta-bi-tha), that’s what her parents came up with. They don’t always have to be a certain way. There is no right or wrong. Anything’s possible in my opinion.
Mslewis: “(2) a wedding is great fun and they wouldn’t want their future King to marry his future Queen at the local registry!!”
Some unintended irony, perhaps. The local registry is exactly where Charles (the next King) and Camilla (who know what she’ll be called) got married. The ceremony after in St George’s Chapel was for show.
I’d call Armani or Valentino.
Call Oscar de la Renta. He’s the best.
Am I supposed to care?
Shut up @Rose! That ring has a lot of significance, even for me. I was 9 when I watched the wedding with Diana, and I love seeing that ring once again.
She will look fabulous on her wedding day.
@ City Girl to Country Girl:
“Catherine” with a ‘c’ is the English/Irish/French spelling of the name. Germans, Scandanavians, etc., use “Katherine” more exclusively.
The nickname “Kate” is more typically spelled with a ‘k.’ (Don’t know why!) My aunt was always called “Kathleen,” but the name on her birth certificate was “Catherine.” “Cate” (as in Blanchett)is a more unusual spelling of the diminutive.
Johnny Depp’s Girl: “Shut up @Rose!” Classy of you. You’re not the only one who remembers that ring.
She would look great in a Vera Wang gown.
I thought I read somewhere else that the royal calender had been cleared out the first part of August leading many to think August 6 is the wedding date. I can’t see Kate wanting to marry the last weekend of July since there will be non-stop comparisons to Dianas wedding if the dates are the same or within a few days of each other.
Even the first weekend of August is too close for me if I was Kate. She gets Dianas ring and then is expected to marry close to the 30th anniversary of Dianas wedding too? Maybe they’ll update Dianas wedding dress and Kate can wear it too. That’s why I’m hoping it’s a spring or fall wedding. Otherwise, if I was Kate I’d feel like it’s almost like this wedding was planned specifically so everything said about it could also include and evoke Diana. Not that Kate wants to exclude Diana but a girl getting married wants to be recognized in her own right for her own qualities verses being compared to her mother in law everytime she turns around.
@ Kaiser.
I really appreciate your comments regarding the “conservative” dresser. You are SO RIGHT ON!
I want to add… Kate has the narrowest hips I have ever seen on a woman. Coupled with a long torso, Kate has a very streamlined body. The clothes that she wears, especially for formal occasions, are not conservative whatsoever. Take the above blue clingy jersey dress. If Halle Berry, or Scarlett Johansson, or one of the Kardashians was wearing this dress it would be clinging to their chest and hips. But Kate has no chest & hips, so she need not think about these details.
But I’m sick of people saying a woman dresses “conservatively” or “classy” just because she has a streamlined, non-curvy body type!!!!
Rant, over.
JulieM, I totally forgot about Charly and Cammie!! But, really, I can’t stand either of them and I try to ignore them. Thanks for the reminder though!!
People, don’t even think about any designer other than a British designer doing Catherine/Kate’s wedding gown. Can you imagine the controversy if she were to choose Vera Wang? Gawd!!
Mslewis: Know what you mean about the “requirement” for a British designer doing “The Dress”. I remember all the hoopla about Diana not only having a British designer do her wedding dress, but also most of what she wore in the subsequent years. I think once she was divorced, she could branch out a bit. She was, however, definately hamstrung fashion wise during her marriage. I can see, though, the economic benefit to the British fashion industry having Kate go with a native designer.
Vera Wang would be really different. But, imagine what Lagerfeld could do, a Chanel to DIE FOR!!!
wow
umm… this is just…
Katie, that’s her hand not Will’s. LOL.
I think the pic was taken as she was gesturing while talking?
Kate must have mixed feelings with the ring, hope it doesn’t put a curse on the union. That ring unfortunately symbolized a phony, loveless marriage. I liked what William said though about having Diana be part of it.