Elusive baby Suri supposedly captured on film!


First people said they saw her, and now there are supposed photographs that will be published in Vanity Fair this Fall. Come on, why the delay?

SURI Cruise’s days of being a mystery baby some believe doesn’t really exist are about up. Sources say Vanity Fair has landed the first photos of the care fully guarded tot spawned by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes last April. The pictures were taken by ce lebrity snapper Annie Leibovitz and will be published this fall, spies say. Both Vanity Fair and Cruise’s reps had no comment. In recent weeks, celeb pals of the couple, including Tom’s ex Penelope Cruz, have tried to dampen skepticism by insisting they’ve seen her.

You know they say that the photographs were taken by Annie Liebovitz to add a smidgeon of legitimacy to the claims that Suri’s been photographed. Why would they take pictures now ahead of time and then release them in the Fall? They have to know that the pictures will get out and no amount of legal threats will keep them off the blogs like little Shiloh’s online debut. Unless there really are no pictures at all and they’re just trying to buy time until they can come up with a baby.

By saying the pictures were taken now in April they also get the added advantage of masking the baby’s age. Babies age a lot in a few months. If they claim the pictures were taken now in April they have a few months to procure a newborn baby and get pictures taken just in time for publication.

This baby has never been photographed even far away and there’s a huge bounty on its head. No baby accessories, strollers, or carseats have ever been seen near its parents or their vehicles. There are very peculair circumstances surrounding its birth, with a questionable birth certificate. Only a few “eyewitnesses” have come forth – with strange statements that sound coerced.

Yesterday Tom’s rep said that pictures would be released “soon.” All of sudden they’re claiming that Annie Liebovitz has already photographed the baby. This is bullshit.

Update: Thanks to Angelika for pointing out that the baby was said to be photographed back in April, not now. That makes it even more suspect because they have until the Fall to get pictures of a newborn.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

6 Responses to “Elusive baby Suri supposedly captured on film!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. tina says:

    i kinda agree with you celebitchy, i’ll believe it when i see it

  2. Angelika says:

    I read on some other sites that the pictures weren’t even taken NOW, they were already taken in April!

  3. celebitchy says:

    You are right Angelika, I didn’t read that carefully enough. I will post an update.

  4. Angelika says:

    I didn’t mean it as an offense or anything, I’m just even more shocked that they were already taken a while back and still haven’t been published.. How weird is that?

  5. celebitchy says:

    No I know it was an FYI, and I appreciate that! It can’t be true that they were already taken or they would have leaked out. There is no evidence at all that this baby exists.

  6. Angelika says:

    I personally think that this whole mistery thing is bullshit, I think the photos were taken shortly after her birth but no-one wanted them, that’s it! What about this story from WireImage, that Cruise simply wanted way more money than they were willing to pay, and additionally, he wanted to donate it to Scientoloty which WireImage didn’t want either, like no magazine did! So the photos were taken off the market again, but now that everyone suddenly started talking about it again, the prize for the photos rises and they’ll finally be revealed!