Halle Berry wears same engagement-rumor ring she was seen with before


Much ado is being made out of Halle Berry’s engagement or wedding-looking ring that she was spotted wearing yesterday when she was out to lunch in LA with friends. It’s the same ring she was seen wearing in mid-May, though, and she denied at the time that it was an engagement ring. There were stories that her gorgeous model boyfriend, Gabriel Aubry, 31, had proposed and that the ring was in his family for generations. Her rep said it was a new ring from a modern designer and she bought it for herself.

If Halle, 42, is engaged and/or already married we may not hear the real story for a while. She’s had little Nahla five months ago and the only glimpse we’ve had of the baby are faraway photos taken when she was in her backyard, which she threatened to sue over.

All that said, Halle looks great and at least ten years younger. I wonder what Tim Gunn would say about her style, though, because it looks pretty comfortable, casual, and simple – kind of like something Jennifer Aniston would wear.

Photo credit: Fame

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

8 Responses to “Halle Berry wears same engagement-rumor ring she was seen with before”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kaiser says:

    To be fair, CB, when Halle turns it *ON* she is a stunning red carpet goddess who always delivers. When Jennifer turns it *ON* it’s a snoozefest – always the same hair, make-up, jewelry, always the same two kinds of dresses: either minimalist sacks or desperate age-inappropriate pieces that emphasize her a$$ and boobs.

    Other than that, I hope Halle does get married. I think this Aubrey guy is a good one.

    But I know Halle has said that she doesn’t want to get re-married – thus she would be called a ZOMG HIPPOCRAT if she ZOMG CHANGED HER MIND.

  2. geronimo says:

    Lol, Kaiser!

    Yeah, the difference between the two is that Halle can do classy and elegant effortlessly while JA, although looking perfectly nice most of the time, just isn’t what I’d describe as naturally elegant or stylish. It’s such an inate thing, can’t be faked, you either have it or you don’t.

    Not a criticism, just an opinion.

  3. Diva says:

    OK… I was gone for awhile, and even when I’m here I can’t always keep up with the lingo, lol, but, can someone tell me what ZOMG means so I don’t feel like such a dweeb when I’m reading it? 😆

  4. geronimo says:

    It’s an extra deranged, outraged ZOOOO MYYYY GODDDDD!!!!!

    Get it? Like an extra expressive one, reserved primarily by the anti-J-Ps for the J-P’s latest outrage (eg. having children, changing their minds, using the internet, hating America etc etc etc, usually acompanied/followed by LIeR LYIng mAN STEELER etc etc etc.)

    If I’m wrong on the ‘Z’, Kaiser will correct me.

  5. Kaiser says:

    Geronimo, Diva – Yeah, that’s how I’ve always used it. When I type it, I say to myself “Zo. My. God.”

  6. Diva says:

    GOT IT! 😉 lol

    Thanks!

    I say something very similar to that when I read alot of comments here lately, lol.

  7. daisy424 says:

    I know Diva, I didn’t know either, I was too imbarrassed to ask, being out of the loop with the lingo. I googled it 😉

  8. scarf rings says:

    We are a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with helpful info to work on. You have done an impressive activity and our entire neighborhood can be thankful to you.