Jon Hamm doesn’t win Emmys because “we’re not blowing s–t up”

wenn3314965

This Jon Hamm interview isn’t as epic and wonderful as some of his past interviews, but some days, you just need some Hamm (Dong). The premise of this piece is the kick-off of The Hamm’s Emmy campaign. The nominations haven’t even come out yet – they’ll be announced on July 14th. But The Hamm is already being declared “the frontrunner” for the Lead Actor Emmy for Mad Men, mostly because of all of the emotional heavy-lifting he did during the last season. For those of us who watch Mad Men, we remember one of the best episodes of the series, ever, called “The Suitcase”. It was almost all Hamm-Draper and Elisabeth Moss/Peggy, and it was just a superb hour of television, one of the best written and beautifully acted shows I’ve ever seen. The Hamm discusses that particular episode, and he also talks about his man-love for Paul Rudd and Jeff Bridges, and how his heart’s in comedy.

TVLINE | Much of the Emmy discussion about you has focused on “The Suitcase” episode from Mad Men’s fourth season. When you saw the script was almost entirely Don and Peggy (Elisabeth Moss), what was your reaction?
I had a couple of reactions. It was already a hard season for me emotionally with all the stuff my character had gone through to that point, so it was a little bit like, “Jesus, when is this going to end?” But it was also mixed with a kind of delight that this was where this spiral was ending, because I’ve loved the way that my character has interacted with Peggy basically since the pilot. I’ve loved that kind of unknowable kinship and friendship that we’ve established and grown, and in many ways, it felt a little bit like a companion piece to the pilot, only the roles were reversed. [Now Peggy] was the person saying, “What are you doing? What do you think you’re doing to yourself?” She’s kind of the only person in Don’s life who can call him on that without fear of reprisal, and it just comes from such an honest place. I think Elisabeth’s work is so phenomenal. She’s a truly gifted actress, and it was wonderful to get an opportunity to really work one-on-one with her on some really interesting, deep, dark multi-layered scenes.

TVLINE | The episode required a lot of you as an actor. Were you at all intimidated?
Yeah. Honestly, it’s all intimidating. There’s a lot riding on whether or not the audience buys this guy as a real person and the fact that he’s going through these kinds of extraordinary things in his life. If it comes off as not believable in any way, then a huge portion of the impact of what we’re trying to do is lost.

TVLINE | The strength of that episode alone has perhaps made you a frontrunner for the Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series Emmy. Does that make you nervous?
I long ago stopped being nervous about that kind of stuff… It’s such a crapshoot and it’s so not up to me and anything that I can really control. If [another nomination] was to happen, that would be phenomenal. I’m incredibly lucky to even be mentioned [with] the Hugh Lauries and the Bryan Cranstons and the Michael Halls, people whose work I’ve looked up to my whole career in some cases, especially in the case of Hugh, whom I’ve been watching since Black Adder. If I’m [even] mentioned in the same breath as those cats, that’s great. That’s what I take out of that.

TVLINE | Not a single performer on Mad Men has won an Emmy despite all the accolades that have been heaped on the series. Some theorize that’s because the work being done on the show is very restrained and quiet. There’s not much scenery-chewing.
I think that might be part of it. We’re not out there killing people and blowing s–t up. There aren’t many moments that you can point to and be like, “That’s the one that’s going to win you an award” or something. But if you look at it as a whole, it’s a pretty substantial thing to point to as an actor. I think there are plenty of examples of that in the history of television. You can look at the actors on The Wire and be like, “Are you kidding me? Not a single person was nominated for any of these performances? This is crazy. It’s some of the best work on television!” But that’s the way it goes. I think that in the brave, new world of television we find ourselves in, there are almost too many good performances now, and that’s a pretty great place to be if you’re a fan of television, which I am.

TVLINE | You seem to cram a lot of work in between your Mad Men seasons, most of it comedy. Is that because you just want to have a good time before you have to turn back into Don Draper?
[Laughs] I think there’s a portion of truth to that. But also, that’s kind of my world. When I first came to L.A., most of the people I hung out with were in the comedy world. And part of it was just being broke. It was a cheap way to go out and have fun. You could go to Largo or M Bar or Comedy Death-Ray or whatever, and see hilarious stuff and spend five bucks. One of my oldest friends in L.A. is Paul Rudd. We were comedy nerds together when he was living in a crappy apartment in North Hollywood. We would go see Patton Oswalt and Sarah Silverman and Paul Tompkins and Zach Galifianakis and these guys that were doing the alternative comedy circuit. So to get the opportunity to work with those guys on my off hours, it’s nice. Honestly, it’s not like you look at Don Draper and go, “Oh, I bet that guy’s really funny. Let’s get him in our goofy ‘Funny or Die’ thing.” That somehow I’ve been able to resonate in that world is certainly nice.

TVLINE | It’s kind of miraculous that you didn’t get typecast as Don Draper. So much of that happens in this business. Was that ever a concern?
Oh, certainly. Once the first season of Mad Men was out there and people were appreciating it and enjoying it, I got a lot of scripts that were Don Draper 2.0 or a dude in a suit in the ’50s and ’60s or a guy in a hat or whatever. I tried to make a conscious decision of, “Well, I do that eight months out of the year. Let’s try to find something that might be a little bit different or might enable me to exercise a little bit of a different muscle or show a different side.” [To get] something like The Town… I was thrilled because it was contemporary. It was a little bit different [for me] and had a little of an edge and was an exciting opportunity to get a chance to work with somebody like Ben [Affleck] or Jeremy [Renner] or Rebecca Hall, the amazing group that we got to assemble for that thing. And the same thing with Bridesmaids. I shot that for two days during Season 4 of Mad Men, so it was a nice break. You don’t want to keep banging on the same piano key because after a while that just gets to be boring.

TVLINE | Do you foresee what your career might look like beyond Mad Men? Could you see yourself becoming a comedy movie star?
Well, I hope I get a chance to do both sides. I think that Paul’s career has been really fun for me to watch because he’s been able to do stuff on Broadway and he’s been able to do big movies and big comedies and produce stuff, and really kind of be the architect of his own future, and it’s been really successful for him. So, yeah, one of my acting heroes, which is such a lame term, but one of the people whose careers I look at as an inspiration is a guy like Jeff Bridges, who has been around since he was 18 years old, has done work in drama and crazy Big Lebowski comedy and now is finally getting recognized as a genius. He’s been an amazing actor for 40 years… Hopefully, life is long and a career is long, and you get an opportunity to do many things. And as you change not only as a human being, but as an actor, different roles come to you. You know, I’m not going to play the young guy really anymore — that ship has sailed. But I do get to work with cool younger people and play different roles, and that’s the exciting thing about having an opportunity like Mad Men. It opens so many other doors.

[From TV Line]

He’s humble, he’s sweet, and he can he talk your ear off. That’s why I love him. And it’s not just filler conversation, either. The Hamm is quite intelligent, he actually thinks about his life and his work, but he doesn’t live in the Hollywood vacuum. He has perspective. My least favorite part about this interview? That he didn’t refer to Elisabeth Moss as “Lizzie” as he usually does. I love that little habit of his – he almost always calls her by her nickname.

Sigh… Hamm Dong. He’s making it harder to spot in recent photos. It’s almost like he knows we’re ogling the Hamm Dong on a regular basis. Still, even if we can’t see it, we know it’s there, lurking like a nine-inch tailpipe.

wenn3035607

51283pcn_friends08

fp_7347252_hamm_john_fp3_excl_08_11

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame & Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Jon Hamm doesn’t win Emmys because “we’re not blowing s–t up””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Diane says:

    I absolutely LOVE this man.

  2. Jilly Bean says:

    love love love him!
    BTW at the Club 281 (Male Strip club) in Montreal – there is a gorgeous entertainer there who looks like a 25 year old Jon Hamm….if you are in town…

  3. mln76 says:

    I love him and he gets props for mentioning Comedy Death Ray 🙂

  4. Ruby says:

    He is one good looking man. He seems grateful for his success and is quite humble from his interviews. Gratefulness & humility- the sexiest traits in ANY man. Intelligent, articulate and classy, there are not enough adjectives to describe Hamm. Did I mention he’s hot! Swoooooon 😉

  5. sara says:

    I can’t stand him, seriously.

  6. lucy2 says:

    Love him!
    I think he has a shot at winning this year, mainly because I think Breaking Bad didn’t have any new episodes, so the brilliant Bryan Cranston is out.
    I kind of like that the show has been recognized more than the individual performances, because the whole show is so great.

  7. Mrs. Odie 2 says:

    Bryan Cranston’s role on Breaking Bad is also not about killing people and blowing stuff up. It’s a character driven show and he is beyond brilliant in it.

  8. vic says:

    Breaking Bad’s last episode was in June 2010 and starts again in July so Cranston’s eligible again. Agree he and the show are brilliant. Same with Michael C. Hall and Dexter. They truly do carry their shows completely. Love Hamm too though and I think he should win one.

  9. searching4grace says:

    Didn’t see the appeal until I started watching Mad Men. Didn’t start enjoying the appeal until I got well into Season 2 and nearly into Season 3. He’s actually a really phenomenal actor, with this surprising and spontaneous smile that’s great. I see the appeal now.

  10. Lala11_7 says:

    I don’t agree with Hamm’s assessment regarding “Mad Men” not winning an Emmy because they’re not “blowing s–t up”…I think that he is going up against some HEAVY HITTERS…and when that happens…good luck (great for viewers though)…

    I LUVS a verbal, intelligent man…and anyone who gives Jeff Bridges his proper due…

  11. Reality says:

    Since Mad Men has been on hiatus I’ve caught up with Breaking Bad, and it has blown my mind.

    Mad Men is more slick, groomed and stylish, while Breaking Bad is gritty, sometimes ugly and realistic.

    And as much as I love Jon Hamm as Don Draper, his performance is not nearly so subtle and wide-ranging, and blowing stuff up doesn’t equal awards.

  12. Tiffany says:

    The man stated what I always thought was crap. How is it The Wire never got any award season love. Seriously, one of the best television shows of the last 20 years and it any nominations or talk came about, the show would have had a larger audience which it deserved . There is always DVD sales.

  13. Kim says:

    There is nothing being blown up on Modern Family and 30 rock and they win Emmys? Mad Men was good at first but now its just overrated. Although I do like Jon Hamm alot.

  14. Kim says:

    Tiffany- The head guy on the Wire (drawing blank on his name) won an Emmy didnt he? great show.

    How do shows like 30 Rock keep winning but other shows that really are good dont get any recognition?!

  15. HannahG says:

    I don’t agree at all with that sentiment re why it hasn’t won emmys. Most Emmy winners aren’t blowing shit up. John Hamm is alright, but he’s no John Spencer.

  16. Camille says:

    Yawn. Didn’t bother to read the ‘blah blah’ interview. But that quote sounds like he is whining to me. Not hot.

    Also wanted to say how over rated this guy is. His thin lipped fug face does nothing for me. Couldn’t care less about his dick either lol.

  17. Shoe_Lover says:

    He could very well be the perfect man- handsome, intelligent, charming and funny

  18. Chris says:

    Re awards: TV shows and movies are a collaborative endeavour and sometimes the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. It’s like the old sporting metaphor about champion teams being better than a team of champions.

  19. lucy2 says:

    vic, unless something has changed, I’ve seen several articles about Breaking Bad not being eligible, because the season 4 premiere will be airing later than usual, after the May 31st cut off. Season 3, which ended in June 2010, was in for last year’s Emmys.
    It’s a shame because BC probably would have justifiably won again, making it 4 in a row and an Emmy record.

  20. normades says:

    Hamm for EGOT! He could actually do it.

    Love the love for RUDD, that is too cute.