Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux spent holidays in Telluride, not the beach?!?

Throughout last fall, the tabloids were constantly full of speculation that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux were totally going to get married over the holidays. Some said it would be a beach wedding in Cabo with Chelsea Handler as the maid of honor or something. Some said it would be a beach wedding in Hawaii, with a pig on a spit taking the place of Chelsea, I guess. Some said it would even be a beachy shindig in LA, or perhaps even a beach-themed NYC wedding. Well, none of it came to pass. The surprising part is that it doesn’t even seem like Aniston and Theroux were anywhere near a beach over the holidays! What’s going on with Jen? That bitch has changed! And I kind of like it.

Baby, it’s cold outside!

Despite the chilly temps, Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux kept things hot in Colorado for the first week of 2012! A source tells Us Weekly the duo vacationed in a 13,300 square foot private residence in the Mountain Village outside the town of Telluride — where they were first spotted Dec. 31.

“They had a group of friends [that left] Monday,” the source tells Us. “Justin and Jen [stayed] until Thursday. They had a ski instructor every day.”

“[Jennifer] gets up [and] goes skiing,” adds the source. “Pretty much [she’s] camped out at the house, keeping a low profile.”

Another source tells Us that Aniston, 42, and pal Chelsea Handler took a ski lesson together.

[From Us Weekly]

Jennifer Aniston?!? SKIING?!? Wonders never cease. As much as I think the circumstances surrounding their coupling were sketchy, I think that Justin might end up being a good influence on Jennifer. He gets her out of comfort zone, she’s trying new things, she’s mixing it up, and she seems like a different (less pity-party-having) woman these days. I’ve also extended my timeline for them as a couple. Five months ago, I was thinking that JustJen wouldn’t make it much further than this Spring. Now I’m thinking that they may make it all the way through 2012. Justin is definitely playing a different game than Jennifer’s usual boyfriends.

Photos courtesy of WENN & Fame.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

187 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux spent holidays in Telluride, not the beach?!?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. foozy says:

    nah, it won’t last!

  2. Agnes says:

    Lukewarm plain oatmeal. Hahaha.

  3. Marjalane says:

    I only clicked on this so I could comment- and not nescessarily in a mean way- that these two are boring. The matchy black outfits, the Jen/Justin cutieness. Bleh. Perhaps, (perhaps?) it’s Jen’s new bff that taints her. I don’t know- I just find myself rolling my eyes at them.

  4. Paloma says:

    Justin has much since dating Jennifer; name recognition for one thing. I know, I know, people have heard of him, but the majority had not. And, he is known for sticking around a long time. I, too, thought they might break up after the first of the year. Will be surprised if they make it through the entire year.

  5. spinner says:

    I love them together. It totally works. They look great together & I think they will be together for the long haul. Hot!!

  6. Toot says:

    Jennifer sure loves some Chelsea. That alone makes me not like her.

  7. Cathy says:

    I had never heard of him before he started dating her. What does he do for a living besides use Jen for name recognition?

    • spinner says:

      He is a writer & an actor.

    • Wendy says:

      You know, wrote Tropic Thunder, Iron Man 2 script, Rock of the Ages about to come out with Cruise?

      • Me11 says:

        And cheated on Heidi Bivens during their 14 year relationship.

      • Shay Kay says:

        Wendy you make so much common sense but there’s not a chance in hell a brangeloonie is going to admit that a handsome, successful man might date an attractive, successful woman if her name is Jennifer Aniston.Thus, JT is neither handsome (which is a matter of opinion), nor successful (no matter what his resume says),nor anything but a famewh@ore(no matter if he’s 40 without having shown that potential).If that’s not enough they (the loonies) will point out that JA is not attractive (which is a matter of opinion), is successful only because of Brad Pitt(despite success before him), nor anything but a vacuous blonde (because that’s how they like to see her).You and your silly logic!Thanks though as some of us totally agree with you!

      • Wendy says:

        I know, I don’t know what’s gotten into me, lol

      • Maeve says:

        Who said Theroux wasn’t successful. He’s not my type but then Jen doesn’t seem to have a type if you look at her relationship history. Mayer is very successful. So is Vince Vaughn and Scott Stuber. I think Tate Donovan has struggled with his career but e isn’t poor by an means.

    • HadleyB says:

      He also was in sex and the city, six feet under, other movies.. for a long time.. just not a fake Alister like most actors.

      It’s not like he didn’t do anything until Jen came along…. so sick of people acting like he was working at 7-11 until he hooked with Jen

      • Robin says:

        So……he’s been in Hollywood this whole time writing, acting and dating a normal and gorgeous girl but no one remembers his name. But it isn’t until he starts dating JA does he get name recognition and gets named as one of People mag’s sexiest of the year? Interesting.

      • Wendy says:

        Robin, the public may not have known his name, but that doesn’t mean he was an unknown to Hollywood. Tropic Thunder = Stiller, Jack Black, RDJ, Cruise. Iron Man 2 = RDJ, Paltrow, Johannson, Rockwell, Samuel Jackson, Paul Bettany. Rock of the Ages = Cruise, Zeta Jones, Baldwin, Giamatti. Succesful doesn’t have to equal famous.

      • Robin says:

        @ Wendy, I wasn’t referring to Hollywood, I was referring to the public. It’s obvious that people in Hollywood would know who he was, otherwise he wouldn’t be able to work and write for such well known projects. But finally getting recognition from the public is what my point was.
        Before, I would have believed that he was acting and writing because of the love he has for his craft. But now, I would more tend to believe that he has more love for his name being recognized and becoming a star. That’s all I’m saying.

      • Wendy says:

        I don’t know the guy, but I would think that if he was really the famewh*re type that needs everyone to know who he is, he would have made a move before 40. It’s not like he doesn’t know enough A listers in HW on his own dime that could have hooked him up with a famous face that he had to stay with someone that would bring him no press for 14 years.

      • Robin says:

        Wendy, I don’t know the guy, either. But he may have not been the famewh*re type before and been quite happy living with a no name person.
        As he’s gotten older, he may need the name recognition to stay working at the level of the big name projects that he’s had. Just because he knows alot of Alisters does not guarantee a job in a movie. Because if you look at actors around his age, you are able to recognize their names and 3 or 4 films that they have been in and films that they’re going to be working on. Attaching himself to a very famous girl pretty much guarantees that his picture will get taken, people will talk about him and wondering what projects/films that he’s up to.
        Maybe they do work out or maybe they don’t. But if I were Aniston, I would think it would be exhausting and sort of humiliating to constantly be used for PR.

      • Wendy says:

        Ok, but he got the job on Iron Man 2 because Downey recommended him. The film made $625 million world wide. Downey got an Oscar nom and Cruise got a GG nom for the parts they played in Tropic Thunder. Chances are, Cruise recommended him for Rock of Ages, an adaptation of the succesful Broadway and West End show. And people think he needs Aniston to get ahead? I’m sorry, but personally I think Downey and Cruise trump Aniston (influence wise) by a long shot. And these people obviously have the guy’s back.

      • Heine says:

        Robin: Or he met someone he liked and she likes him?

        Why are you leaping to the conclusion that she’s being used for PR?

        They don’t look miserable or bored when they are out together. They look like they enjoy each other’s company. What is the problem? Is she no longer fitting into the pathetic loser box you’ve decided she belonged to?

      • Robin says:

        Did Downey recommending him for Iron Man 2 get people to talk about him and be interesting to the press? Did Cruise recommending him for Rock of Ages get the magazines to put him in between their pages? NO. Like I have stated before, he has known Alisters in Hollywood, who will trump Aniston any day of the week. BUT for him to actually be considered a star, for his name alone, like his friends Downey and Cruise, he finally needs to be seen in the public eye as being someone interesting that they want to pay to see.

      • Robin says:

        Heine, since when did I ever say she was a pathetic loser? All I ever said about her was that maybe their relationship will work or maybe they won’t? But gee, isn’t that with all relationships?

        The only thing that I’m basically stating that is she deserves happiness and shouldn’t be used by anybody to further their own career or for their own agenda.

      • mylie1313 says:

        Justin is almost working at the the 7 eleven. You should go up not down, her ex Brad Pitt is the highest paid actor for 2011. Jen , Jen have to work work to maintain and keep up their life styles he co-wrote not wrote Tropic Thunder as her fans like to claim he is a writer amongst others and have acted in bit parts on sitcoms and movies anything you want to know about Justin Theroux is on the web no one have heard of him until JA picked him up. If that’s who she wants good for her but don’t try to make him out to be more than he is to build up your idol JA, his bio is all over the internet just plug his name in.

      • sandra says:

        I agree with Mylie – he was a writer among many and no one outside of H’wood pays attention to writers – let’s get real. Never saw him in anything onscreen either. He sure did jump in stature once he dated JA though … and those STUPID matching outfits!! Him with his little stumpy legs and her wrapped up looking cold with bare ankles – ARGH!!!!

      • Heine says:

        Robin: He is not a lead actor like Tom Cruise or Ben Stiller. If you look at ‘That Guy’ character actors like him, you more than likely cannot attach a name to their faces. Maybe he wants to get out of ‘That Guy’ recognition but he doesn’t behave in a famewhorey fashion to me.

        Famewhores, to me, are people who want to be famous and will do whatever nonsense they can to stay in the media loop. He hasn’t done that, in my opinion. He doesn’t give unnecessary interviews. There are no pictures of him yet this year. He isn’t on the docket for any starring roles. He isn’t tweeting every inane thought and ‘sexy’, attention grabbing pictures of himself or Aniston.

        And no, you didn’t say she was a pathetic loser but the implication lies in your comments about him using her and how humiliating it would be for you.

        I do wonder why you imply that he’s using her as opposed to taking advantage of and following the direction of a new publicist. Why leap to the conclusion that their relationship might be based on shady intentions on his part instead of something more sincere?

        She seems happy, and you want her to be happy, so why isn’t that enough? Why are you still questioning it? (I’m not trying to be a jerk here, I’m just curious about your thoughts)

      • Robin says:

        Heine, not all famewhores, thankfully, do not follow the Kardashian game plan or like that disaster of a relationship with that jerk, John Meyer.

        But as you said yourself, at his age, he may finally got tired of being “That Guy” in this film or that. His eyes on the prize maybe that he wants to be the headline marquee name on a movie poster like Tom Cruise and Ben Stiller. And being attached to her in a relationship, which everyone in the world pays attention too, is a pretty quick way of getting your name out there. And I believe that he did sign on to use her same agents?

        As for the humiliating part, don’t you think having your personal life out there for everyone to dissect and theorize is humiliating? Because with all her past relationships, whether they were PR stunts or not, she did put her heart and soul into them. And when she breaks up with them, she gets photographed, tweeted and blogged about endlessly. She’s not able to regroup and compose herself because her breakup is now part of the internet and becomes fodder for all her critics.

        The reason that I question the sincerity of his intentions is that I have an a family member that seems to being following Aniston’s blueprint in life. She’s very attractive, successful, and intelligent. Unfortunately, she always seems to get herself attached to these men. My aunt is an executive for a big international company and of course her boyfriends get the luxury of being introduced to the right people, go to the best parties, and so on. Like Aniston, these guys make her happy….for the time being. As her family, we’re always happy for her and keep our reservations and concerns to ourselves. But they never do stick around once they get their careers on track and my aunt is left holding the bag. That’s why, like my aunt, Aniston needs to find someone filling to love her and make her happy….just for her.

      • Heine says:

        Robin: I definitely see your point about her dating choices; the woman has chosen some truly noxious human beings to mess around with who definitely improve their status by associating with her. There is no denying that. And she does get in too deep with some of them and I can imagine it would suck to see that sprawled all over some trashy magazine.

        I just don’t know if wanting recognition for your work is the same as famewhoring. I wouldn’t equate the two. Especially in the entertainment industry where recognition for your work is pretty much the point.

        Theroux doesn’t seem to want to be a star to me. He wants more name recognition sure (which is likely the reason why he went with CAA) but I don’t think he wants to be a top-billed, Tom Cruise style superstar. If he starts going for starring roles this coming year, I will totally eat my words.

        I’ll admit though that I probably have a skewed view of any Hollywood relationship because I work in the entertainment industry. No one has any kind of relationship with anyone else unless they want something from the other, pure and simple. I understand the issue with your aunt but the entertainment industry is like a giant, incestuous pool of users.

        If you go into dealing with those people with that in mind, then you understand how common ‘using’ (having a beneficial relationship with) others is and how it isn’t considered a negative thing at all. It’s so normal that it is expected. No one talks to anyone unless they feel they can get something from them. I wouldn’t work if I didn’t use my contacts.

        And if you happen to meet someone you like and your relationship is mutually beneficial, all the better. If its mostly one-sided, that’s understandable because high/low relationships are extremely common in this industry.

        I guess my point is that he could be totally sincere in liking her but can also see the benefits of being with her. The two aren’t really mutually exclusive.

      • Wendy says:

        Robin: he doesn’t need people to talk about him outside of the Hollywood people. Being a celebrity doesn’t get you writing jobs, otherwise Paris Hilton, Miley Cyrus and the Kardashians would all be writing scripts and making big money at it. And he’s obviously more focused on that than acting these days.

  8. WhateverTho says:

    they seem like they so desperately want to be seen as ‘cool couple’ in those overly contrived ‘street casual’ looks… jen needs to just go be the boring 40 something yr old woman who can’t act that she is and have peace about it. and that scarf looks like its about to eat her head in the first pic.

    • bea says:

      “overly contrived ‘street casual’ looks”
      pretty much said what I was thinking.

      I wonder if she pays someone to help her look “New York”? I bet. Prob. the same person who has to iron her cuffs on her jeans.

      I’m sure she’ll return to her beach “roots” when they break up.

      • Elizabeth says:

        @ BEA – ITA. If she spends that much time being “different” so that she’ll fit in with him, it sounds kinda doomed to me. If the woman really wanted to learn to ski, she would have done it some time in the last 40 years. Doing it now because she’s with him sounds desparate. And kinda doomed.

      • Lady D says:

        @ Elizabeth, I didn’t know there was an expiry date for learning new things.

      • Heine says:

        Elizabeth: You’re kidding, right? My mom learned how to swim when she was 54. She wasn’t desperate, she was interested in learning to do something new.

        Why is it that whenever Aniston does anything, literally anything, it is labeled as ‘desperate’?

        She could, you know, just want to learn to ski.

      • whatevs says:

        before this, it was “overly contrived-relaxed, natural cali beach girl” look. now she’s dating a hipster to prove that she’s not all surface or something lmao. anyway i heard she pays an astronomic sum to keep that infamous hair looking healthy, natural and unkempt all the time. which is ironic when you think about it. if you pay so much, why not make it glamorous and perfect all the time? but her image is the funny and zen cool girl i get it lol

    • Vesper says:

      I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I actually miss her old style – long hair, high heels, a nice, albeit boring, dress. Looking at the above pics, I can’t stand anything she is wearing. And, her hair looks awful.

    • micha says:

      he was unheard of by the public ’til he met Jen. He will dump her after their movie comes out. Positively guaranteed. She is a scum bag that has allowed the public to blame her poor acting skills on Brad leaving her for a much hotter women.

  9. stephanie says:

    i hate this weird baggy jeans look she’s had since getting with this guy.

    • Happy21 says:

      Me TOO!!! And I loathe the baggy jeans cuffed at the bottom. It looks silly and if its fashionable I don’t care, it is awful!

  10. missanne says:

    why cant he hold the umbrella over her, too?

    • Kate says:

      Thought the same thing… what a tool!

    • deltona lakes says:

      I still can’t get over it everytime I see this photo with the umbrella over his head and not covering hers although he has a hat on as well.

    • operagirl says:

      Agree! Any guy who only thinks of himself in the rain rather than thinking of his girl . . . it just doesn’t speak well of him.

      Actually, that goes for us girls, too.

      • Iggles says:

        I love this photo! 😆

        Speak volumes about their relationship.. It cracks me up every time!

    • cyn says:

      The Umbrella photo speaks a thousand words…Maybe, he’s the me… myself.. and… I type of guy.

  11. Nicola says:

    My guess, his way, her money. And she’s fine with that.

    She’s not getting any younger. Ignore the “how great she looks part”, she’s still a single woman at 42, and while for some of us, me included, this wouldn’t be an issue, her fanbase (the ones who started the poor Jen brigade after “the breakup”) are starting to look at her funny.

  12. Elle says:

    It will probably last until their movie comes out.

    Hardly anyone knew who he was before he left poor Heidi after 14 (!!!!!) years to get more famous and reap the benefits. Since then he has joined with CAA, had GQ photoshoots, gets named in People sexiest men issue, gets papped all the time etc.

    Her fans are so desperate for her to be with someone, anyone, they would all be cheering if she dated Charlie Sheen or Carrot top.

    • Esmom says:

      Omg, lol, “Charlie Sheen or Carrot Top.” Now that I’d like to see.

    • whatevs says:

      we can only hope! wander lust is only a month away. after that his time will be up i suppose, and we won’t see these contrived pics everywhere. we’ll see other contrived pics lol. i bet her team will run a lot of gossip stories to the tabloids again, to make a noise, and she’ll go all “i don’t want to talk about my private life” again

  13. Wendy says:

    Wow, they went skiing and no one is walking with a cane afterwards? Sounds like fun!

    • ahoyhoy says:

      Neither was holding a child when they fell.

      • Wendy says:

        Then they’re a lot smarter than someone who skiis with a child in their arms. There isn’t much difference between that and driving with your child on your lap, danger wise.

      • ahoyhoy says:

        He was STANDING when he fell. And he’s pushing 50. But why let facts get in the way of the vitriol you’re clutching at after 7 LONG YEARS?
        Get over it, babe. Life is waiting for you!

      • Wendy says:

        Google is your friend. Various sites ” wiped out on ski hill while carrying child”… “I was carrying Viv down the hill”… Etc etc. Never mind that anyone standing still on a hill would be leaning backwards a bit for balance. Meaning if your feet go out from under you, you fall backwards (uphill) and the child lands on top of you like you’re a big air bag / cushion.

      • ahoyhoy says:

        “carrying” is not skiing, Wendy, and it’s not the same as driving with a child on your lap.
        If your hero Jen is over it, why can’t you be?
        Grasping at straws trying to make her ex look like a bad parent (or even just a bad skier for getting hurt *lol*) makes you look really pathetic. Please get some sun, dear, and stop fighting Jen’s proxy battle here.
        Now, I’m off to worry about my own personal life & interests; I recommend you do, too.

      • mln76 says:

        Yes it’s true Brad is the only person in the world to ever fall and injure himself. If he hadnt left Jen it would never’ve happened *major eye roll at the bitter overreaching of the hags*

      • Wendy says:

        Ladies. I’ve been skiing since I was six. I have a brother in law who is paralyzed from the waist down from a skiing acciden, an expert skier who hit a patch of ice and then a tree. I’m not a “going skiing for one week a year” skier. Brad falling? No big deal, the first thing they teach when learning to ski is how to fall properly, so it’s expected. An adult carrying a child while skiing? Where I’m from, he’d have gotten his ticket pulled the second the Ski Patrol saw him doing something so stupid and dangerous, Brad Pitt, Jean Claude Killy or a current member of the Olympic ski team, it doesn’t make a whit of difference. And yes, that IS on par with driving with your kid on your lap. Your body can still impact on your child in the event of an accident and you are still going at a some speed, no matter how slow. In addition, holding a child affects your balance, which is obviously an issue if you’re on the ski hill. I actually kind of hope that the backpedalling that’s now going on regarding how he was injured is a sign that the ski story was a poorly thought out PR blurb. Otherwise, he’s an oblivious moron.

      • micha says:

        no, he wasn’t skiing with her when he fell. He said he was carrying her down the slope. I am a lifelong skier and that is how kids learn. If they get scared..as well as I’ve seen older skier do.. they get carried or walked down the slope. I have seen many people twist knees just walking down the slope.It is not against the law or like driving with a child on your lap when you ski with another….or carry a child down the slope. Just so you know.

      • Wendy says:

        Micha: So you’re telling me that he was carrying her skis, her poles, his poles and his child while he skied down to the bottom of the bunny hill? And you think that’s normal or safe? Please!

        Normal is: you take her skis off, you take your skis off. You put your skis and poles over your shoulder to carry them. You do the same with the child’s skis and poles if you can manage, otherwise you have the child carry them in the same way you are carrying your own. You take the child’s hand in yours if need be and you both walk down the hill. And frankly, if she’s afraid of walking down a hill to the point she needs to be carried, they had no business putting her on a ski slope to start with.

        Regardless, the story of how he hurt himself has now “evolved” into something completely different, so chances are that neither version is true anyways. It was probably something ridiculously banal like “one of the kids left marbles on the floor and he wiped out on them” or “the dog tripped me up while the kids were chasing him”, but they decided to try and get some Oscar vote mileage out of the whole “Brad the protective father” angle. Clooney already went to a football game with his arm in a sling, right?

      • madi says:

        That’s the story that was told!!

      • madi says:

        That’s the stort that was told!!

      • Maeve says:

        Brad wasn’t skiing when he fell. He was in their yard in Los Feliz. The media got it wrong. As usual!

      • Wendy says:

        Maeve: from Lainey, who was standing right there when Jolie said it:
        >>>When he came down to my area, he was quick with his explanation about his leg and the cane, saying simply that he tripped over his daughter. So when Angelina followed a few minutes later and was asked about him “tripping over their daughter”, she rolled her eyes exasperatedly like any wife who has to pick up after her husband (really cute) and was like, no no, he didn’t trip over her, he was carrying her while skiing and took the fall for her instead”<<<

    • deltona lakes says:

      of course not they are in their 40’s with no children. JA if she were to get pregnant now she would have child entering kindergarten at 50 years old.

    • lisa says:

      Wow what a reach.

      • ahoyhoy says:

        Wendy’s comment was a ‘reach’ in that Brad has a cane now from a skiing accident. Do keep up!

      • Wendy says:

        Oh, you didn’t mean 42 + 5 = 50 being a reach? Because kindergarden doesn’t start at 8, unless they’ve changed the rules…

      • deltona lakes says:

        @ Wendy
        Considering she will be 43 years next month and you’re pregnant for 9 months. she would be turning 44 with an infant add 5 years that’s about 49 years close to 50 years old.

      • Wendy says:

        Considering she’s currently 42 and may already be pregnant for all any of us know, that would take her to 48 and kindergarden. It’s a reach either way you look at it, one year or two, your math sucks.

    • Well,where do you assume they were skiing? I’m not an expert on this,but…Do they allow parents to ski down the slopes with a child in their arms??

      • My heart goes out to your brother in-law.I too,have many people close to my heart,that tragic accidents have happened to.

      • Wendy says:

        Hanna, no ski hill worth their salt in North America would allow a parent to ski with their child in their arms. It’s reckless and probably opens them up to huge liability issues. That said, celebs regularly get away with things that we regular people don’t.

        As for my brother in law, my heart went out to him too. He was a classmate, a friend, the class clown and a very gifted althelete. It took him a long time to get past the bitterness of what his life had become.

      • Maeve says:

        Brad wasn’t on a ski slope when he fell. He was in their yard in Los Feliz. The media got it wrong, as usual.

    • Trek Girl says:

      Brad and Angelina never said they were skiing when the accident happened. They said that Brad was walking down a slope, a.k.a a hill, in their backyard when Brad slipped; he took the brunt of the fall so that Vivienne would not get hurt.

      The skiing detail came about when ET added it, not Brad or Angelina. I think there’s actually video of Brad talking about it.

      • madi says:

        You are such a good cover-up PR person. Brad should extend your contract

      • Wendy says:

        Well, Lainey was there and she said that it was Jolie who said he was skiing.

        >>>When he came down to my area, he was quick with his explanation about his leg and the cane, saying simply that he tripped over his daughter. So when Angelina followed a few minutes later and was asked about him “tripping over their daughter”, she rolled her eyes exasperatedly like any wife who has to pick up after her husband (really cute) and was like, no no, he didn’t trip over her, he was carrying her while skiing and took the fall for her instead”<<<

      • DeeVine says:

        For all we know, almost 50 year old Brad probably just slipped in the bathroom while reaching for a towel. However, the story about slipping while carrying a child, and taking the brunt of the fall sounds so much more exciting for awards season and the red carpet.

  14. Pisa says:

    He is a real gentleman holding the umbrella like that.

  15. HadleyB says:

    I hate this look on Jen. What I loved about her was her casual looks off the red carpet .. but now .. it’s too menswear ish, too trying to be casual when she did it effortlessly before.

  16. Me11 says:

    Lol we know “source” is Jen’s pr. Every thing these tw do seem to be so calculated right down to the clothes on their backs. Is any one else thinking Justin, Jen & Chelsea Handler got a three-way going? I kind of think Jen do women to.

    • Emma - the JP lover says:

      Well, a ‘Beard. by any other name is still a ‘Beard,’ whether his name is Brad Pitt, Vince Vaughn, John Mayer, or Justin Theroux. Either it’s a three-some and Justin just wasn’t Courtney Cox’s type, or Justin is a Beard for Jen and Chelsea Handler, who seems to go on Vay-Kay with Jen now wherever that Vay-Kay seems to be.

      But (truly), if Jen is happy and (finally) ready to stand on her own two feet with Justin Theroux (or even Chelsea Handler), then I’m extremely happy for her.

  17. jazz fabulous says:

    so much hate here… why can’t you all be happy for Jen???? sigh.

    • Trek Girl says:

      Because they are under the impression that the relationship is fake, which is not an unreasonable conclusion to come to when one looks at the details of the relationship, as well as her past.

      • Franny says:

        I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone think that their relationship is fake. Yes, they might have gotten together under weird circumstances, which is one reason not to like her, I guess. But I’ve never thought that they were dating for some other reason than to date each other.

      • Trek Girl says:

        @Franny: There are a lot of people here and on other forums that are under the impression that their relationship is some sort of marketing tactic for “Wanderlust”, as well as a way to keep Jennifer’s name in the press and boost Justin Theroux’s profile in the public. Theroux isn’t an unknown, heck, I knew about him and liked him, but there are a lot of people who have no idea who he is, so this has definitely gotten his name out there much more.

        Anyway, Jennifer’s history seems like it’s full of PR tactics and set up relationships. Other stars have this stuff too, but hers seems to be easier to see, so people take everything she says and does with a grain of salt, especially her relationships. It might not be right, but they do.

  18. Bellebeesting says:

    Aniston spent a holiday or two with Vince vaughan in vail(?) or some other ski resort area. Why suggest she hasn’t always mixed it up some?

    • micha says:

      why is she taking lessons then..if she’s has skied before? You only need a few lessons before you can do it…or as most of us growing up in the area…it comes naturally.

      • Wendy says:

        Maybe she’s taking mogul skiing lessons. Maybe he’s a way better skier than she is and she wants to improve so they can enjoy skiing together rather than holding him back. For that matter, maybe she’s taking snowboarding lessons. It’s not just beginners who take lessons.

  19. meme says:

    All the best to the couple.

  20. Pimpcessa says:

    My GOD, what the hell is going on at this site? This couple stays out of sight over the holidays, and they are still getting bashed? Didn’t know this was a Brangelina fan site, honestly thought only JJ was their site, haha. But, the woman takes some skiing lessons and gets reamed for that, because you folks think that the only reason she’s doing it is because of him. In one minute she’s always getting grief for never changing, and the next minute she gets grief for mixing things up a bit….. Jeebus folks, at least figure out what your whining about and stick to it. And to those who don’t like her style with the baggie jeans rolled up and the extra amount of black she’s been wearing…..TOO BAD, SHE DOESN’T CARE WHAT YOU THINK! Get over it people.

    • TXCinderella says:

      Can’t you read? It’s a website to bitch about celebs. Hence the name Celebitchy.

      • spinner says:

        that excuse is getting a bit tired.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        ITA times a thousand, Spinner.

      • Franny says:

        I also agree. Just because the site is called celebitchy doesn’t mean you can just open the floodgates on crazy. The women who write these articles take time to actually write thoughtout posts, not just go batshit over nothing. Some people need to step back and put it all in perspective.

    • Heine says:

      Pimpcessa: I feel you. Basically how the conversation goes:

      ‘She’s so boring! The same beach vacations all the time!’
      ‘She went to Telluride and is learning to ski.’
      ‘Well…do you remember those umbrella pics! Ha ha, speaks volumes!’
      ‘Wait, that has nothing to do with this story. You complain that she’s boring with the beach vacations but she’s gone in a ski trip.’
      ‘Desperate! Pathetic! Umbrella pics speak volumes! He’s spending her money! She’s got an ugly man face!’

    • JulieM says:

      Pimpcessa: I completely agree with you. Jen can’t win for losing. I think they look happy together. Good for them.

    • Thea says:

      Your not allowed an opinion here. If it is different than the majority, you are attacked. Your moms fat, you are ignorant, live in the basement, etc. I always thought our first amendment right was Freedom of Speech without ramification. Apparently, I am mistaken. I believe everybody has the right to their opinion but I do not verbally attack them, insult them and then hound them through the internet on other sites.

  21. Julie says:

    Damn just spent a week there with my kids. Seinfeld was the only star there then. I’ve never seen a star in person. I think I would look briefly and then look away. Their egos are big enough without one more gawker.

  22. Ambergesa says:

    I know the constant baggy cuffed pants and hideous shoe/bootie combo are awful and a failed 3yr old trend. She’s trying way to hard to look young and hipster. He is hot though. Smart and funny gets me every time. I love Mountain Village, a friend has a cabin there and it’s beyond spectacular. If she’d lay off the try I’d
    almost stop thinking she’s so pathetic nah she’s still be shallow and narcissistic

  23. Dusty says:

    He does not have enough money to support this type of lifestyle, so he really is a kept man!

  24. misspdx says:

    SOMEONE PLEASE!! Give this woman a hipster makeover!!

    Just tell Jen to come to Portland for one day. I think she could soak in a little douchbaggery fashion style simply through osmosis.

    Jen, honey, if you are going to make believe you are a hipster, please do us all the favor of at least dressing the part.

  25. ruby says:

    I love those umbrella pictures, they crack me up every time ! so romantic. It speaks volumes.

    • Heine says:

      It is so silly when people say that these photos ‘speak volumes’ or ‘say so much’ about their relationship. She’s not making faces like she’s annoyed with not being under the umbrella. She’s not trying to squeeze herself under the umbrella. He’s not pushing her out and away from it.

      She looks perfectly happy and chill. They are actually smiling in the first umbrella pic.

      What exactly are these pictures ‘saying’? That they can happily wander in the rain?

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        Every time these pics are posted people go on and on about him holding the umbrella over himself and not her. She’s wearing a hat and seems completely ok with it. I know I’m asking for the impossible but I just wish that people would admit that they read into things and take what they want out of it. It’s called projecting. Actually, my fiancee didn’t hold the door open for me the other day because he had his hands full of groceries. Glad I’m not famous or everyone would be screaming that the wedding’s off…*eye roll*

      • ruby says:

        Silly ? Not really. I am fascinated by communication, non verbal cues, be they human or canine. I have read up on this quite a lot. We are a species which relies on verbal communication so much that we tend to forget body language completely… And yet it does indeed always speak volumes. Literally. I am not talking about the bogus hollywood experts that predict the length of a relationship : I wouldn’t presume to announce how long Jennifer and Justin will last.

        I am just saying that this sort of thoughtless thing you do without realizing reveals what your mindset really is. It’s amazing how much simply being aware and attentive and watching someone will reveal about them.

        Back to the umbrella subject, this is typically the sort of thing that reveals your attitude. Some people will be careful to share and it will show. Others will unconsciously hog the umbrella. It shows whether they really care about others on a deeper, unconscious level.

        And what I find so funny here is that the umbrella is so blatantly over him and not her. It’s not even subtle. So yes, these pictures do say something.

        I don’t see why you bring Jen up : I wasn’t speaking about her smiling or not, that was not what I was discussing. She is smiling for the paps : fine, good for her. It doesn’t change anything about how Justin is carrying the umbrella. Surprisingly enough when people know they’re getting photographed quite often they smile.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        Ruby-You are looking at ONE photo and it’s out of context. How do you know Aniston didn’t say “I have a hat, here you take the umbrella” before they started snapping photos? You’re talking about science but really this is just a gossip blog where people make silly comments about the dynamics of the relationship between TWO strangers based on a few photos that get recycled over and over again. More often than not if a guy asks if he can carry my bags I say “no thank you” because I HATE being treated like a China doll or a spoiled princess and I prefer to feel independent and that I can take care of myself. So if someone captured that on camera then that would mean the guy I’m with is a jerk and our realationship is doomed?? Even though I TOLD him I didn’t want him to carry my bags? Ugh, I will never understand people’s inability to admit that celeb gossip is based on SPECULATION-which is fine/fun but stop acting like you KNOW what goes on in these strangers’ lives based on a paparazzi photo.

      • Vesper says:

        Ruby, I totally agree.

        Besides the fact that they rarely smile, I can’t help but notice that Jen is often lagging behind, even when they are holding hands. Typically when couples hold hands they are walking beside each other.

        The Original Kitten, I wouldn’t call non verbal communication a science, it is open to interpretatation. While there could be other explanations for the umbrella shot, the most typical guess for someone looking at body language would be what Ruby described. It doesn’t matter whether she knows them or not. U don’t need to know a person to study their body language. That’s the whole point of reading non verbal communication. That being said, Ruby is not pretending to know about Jen’s relationship she is making observations, again, based on body language.

      • Wendy says:

        I have to say that I thought of the “Great Umbrella Conspiracy” while I was out last night. It was drizzling rain of course. i had a compact umbrella in my purse, which I opened for my husband and I. First he said thanks and then he pulled his newsboy cap out of his pocket and told me I should use the umbrella to keep myself dry since he had a hat.

        It’s possible that the fact that the umbrella was pink may have been a factor, but he wasn’t stuck carrying it, so probably not.

      • Heine says:

        Ruby and Vesper: Making observations based on body language is patently ridiculous. You could say that her ‘lagging behind’ is really him forging ahead to protect her from oncoming danger. Or that him holding the umbrella over himself and not her is because he’s trying to let her know that it’s cool that she doesn’t need him to protect her from the rain. Maybe she’s subconsciously trying to emote that she’s an independent woman who doesn’t need a man to hold an umbrella over her head-she’s fine walking in the rain with her hat and jacket.

        See how silly that sounds?

        If he was bring rude by hogging the umbrella, shouldn’t there be some unconcious ‘irritated’ body language on her part like, I dunno, cutting him dirty looks or crossing her arms or distancing herself from him?

        And beside that, in other pictures in this group, he was holding the umbrella over BOTH of them and she had her arm around his waist, he had his arm around her shoulders, snuggled up close.

        So he was sharing and then something happened (maybe walking hugged up together got uncomfortable, as it tends to do), and she moved away out from under the umbrella. All I can see is two people happily walking down the street. Him holding the umbrella over himself says nothing to me other than he doesn’t want to get wet and she doesn’t care about getting wet.

      • Vesper says:

        So, Heine, what u are saying, without knowing anything about the subject (after all u did refer to it as “science” LOL), is that there is no such thing as non verbal communication. Do u know how silly that sounds?

      • Heine says:

        Vesper: Exactly where did I refer to it as science? If you are going to “lol” at someone, the least you could do is actually read the comment you are laughing at them about.

        Otherwise you come off as petty.

    • I bet Heidi got a good laugh out of it,also

      • Wendy says:

        I can’t help but find it entertaining, if oh so hypocritical, when Jolie fans snark about homewrecking. How do you even dare?

      • Sorry for stepping on your toes.I didn’t realize it was your world that I was snarkin’ in…

      • Wendy says:

        I’m quite willing to snark on both over that point, but seriously… If one is ok with Jolie and Pitt doing it, how is it possible to be not ok with Aniston and Theroux doing it?

      • Wendy** This is what I know to be a fact: Celebitchy,is much more fun than Craigslist or laundry…

      • Wendy says:

        And dusting, vacuuming…

      • SaucepanWoman says:

        Wendy the difference is most know accept that Brad and Angelina didn’t have an affair. Even everyone involved, Jen included, said no affair happened. That isn’t the case with Justin and Jen. Heidi and her mother said he cheated on her, and not only that, there is photographic evidence in the form of photos taken of the 2 couples around the same time. Only Aniston homewrecked out of AJ and JA. And thats the only one that we have proof of.

      • Wendy says:

        Saucepan: It’s patently ridiculous to believe that Pitt and Jolie didn’t have an affair just because they denied it. So did Bill Clinton. Didn’t make it any more true. Aniston would have no way of knowing whether they did or not, it’s not like they invited her to watch, it’s not like she was on set all day every day to witness with her own eyes that it didn’t happen. The only thing she could do was to choose to believe Pitt’s denials or not. And obviously, her choice had no impact on whether it was the truth or not.

        As for Heidi and her mother saying that Theroux cheated. No, they didn’t say that. And I suppose that if the question is ever asked directly to Aniston or Theroux, they too will deny it, just like Pitt and Jolie did. But sorry, a man doesn’t leave his wife or his girlfriend and just “happen” to fall into a relationship with the woman he just finished shooting a film with. In both cases, the wife and the girlfriend were left for another woman. You can do all sorts of mental gymnastics to try and get around that, but that doesn’t make it any less the truth either.

      • SaucepanWoman. says:

        Wendy, both Brad and Jen said in their joint press statement announcing their split that their split was *not* due to any tabloid speculation. Not only that, Courteney and anyone who knew the three to this day say there was no cheating. It was in fact, months after Brad and Jen split, that Brad and Angelina got together, not just ‘suddenly’. And Mr and Mrs Smith was still filming for a fair while after Brad and Jen officially split. Those are the facts.

        Heidi’s mom did indeed indicate there was cheating. Because she said that Justin and Heidi were still together, when photographs were leaked showing Jen and Justin as a couple. Heidi’s mom’s statement shows that to her and Heidi’s knowledge, they were still a couple. And still were, until Heidi moved out the weekend prior to Justin and Jen (having been photographed as a couple for at least 2 and a half months prior) making it official. So here we have it. Brad and Jen split and months later, that is repeat, months later, Angelina and Brad get together. Justin and Heidi don’t split until the last minute, and Jen and Justin seen together 2 and a half months earlier. One got together after the split announcement. The other got together when he still had a girlfriend living in his house.

        Those are the facts. Period.

      • Wendy says:

        Saucepan: it takes at best 6 months to adopt in Ethiopia. Jolie has already said that she and Pitt decided together to adopt. Zahara was picked up early July. The only MAMS shoots that happened after Aniston and Pitt split were 9 days of reshoots in March. The puzzle pieces don’t fit in your timeline, sorry.

        As for Heidi’s mother, the only thing it means is that Heidi’s mother didn’t know. As for Heidi finding out and moving out, neither you nor I can say whether she already knew and was given time to find another apartment (not easy in NYC) and simply moved the date up once it went public or not. Anyways, I’m not going to argue against Theroux cheating on her, because he probably did. Just like Pitt cheated on Aniston.

      • Maeve says:

        Angie never said she and Brad decided to adopt together and they didn’t adopt Zahrar together. That is illegal in Ethiopia. Angie had been planning Zahara’s adoption for over a year and was in Kenya in 4/05 to finalize the paperwork. She said Brad wept the first time he saw Zahara’s photograph when AJ received several photos of baby girls up for adoption. That was when Zahara J-P was 5 months old and first taken to the orphanage by her Grandmother i.e. in May of 2005. Brad wasn’t married in May of 2005.

      • MrsB says:

        BS!!! I work for 20th and worked the MAMS shoot and there were re-shoots in January, March, April & 2 days in May of 2005. You don’t know what you are talking about.

    • Heine says:

      Ruby: ‘Back to the umbrella subject, this is typically the sort of thing that reveals your attitude. Some people will be careful to share and it will show. Others will unconsciously hog the umbrella. It shows whether they really care about others on a deeper, unconscious level.’

      I completely disagree. Just absolutely, totally, without-a-doubt, disagree. Which is ok because we all don’t agree on everything.

      In my opinion, you cannot decide or ‘make observations about’ whether or not someone truly cares about someone else on a ‘deeper, unconscious level’ based on how they hold an umbrella between the two of them for a couple of blocks.

      That is just silly to me.

      • Vesper says:

        Heine, u are hilarious. Non verbal communication is NOT the same as unconscious behaviour. Maybe u should read up on the subject.

    • madi says:

      OK, Dr. Ruby. Whatever book you just gather that information from, I think you should get off the “let’s bash Jen bandwagon”, and form your own opinion. Learn to think on your own, and not channel other people’s thoughts. Jen is as secure as she wants to be in her relationship, whether it is for publicity or not. Now it’s time you go back to reading some more books, and get yourself educated on some real facts.

  26. Ana says:

    Every time they are photographed when it’s raining, he’s always carrying an umbrella and covering himself but never her!!! WHAT IS UP WITH THAT?!? Ummm…Not a gentleman :0/

    • Trek Girl says:

      I don’t think they’ve been photographed while it was raining on several different occasions. I think these are the same photos being used over and over again.

    • Wendy says:

      I know! You’d think she’d buy some new clothes too! She’s wearing the same thing every time we see her! 😉

  27. Guest says:

    The middle-aged couple who does a desperate young man’s fashion needs to get to know age.

    Is jen menopausal disorders?

    • Trek Girl says:

      Justin isn’t middle-aged yet, and I think this is just how he dresses. As for Jennifer dressing this way, well, sometimes it’s fun to be twinsies lol. Besides, while she has never dresses this way before, it’s not like this style of dress is inappropriate; she can dress this way if she wants to. It’s fun to wear different styles of clothing – you know, shake it up a bit.

  28. Kara Ann says:

    Sometimes when reading the posts here, I’m completely like “WTF”? On this thread in particular in aggravates me that up thread someone said she’s 40 and boring and should just accept it! Um, no. There is no age limit to continuing to evolve, learn new things, or experiment with your life! I know that it probably just a typical Jen-Basher but, really, use some logic. The lucky among us will live to see 40 and I don’t think we are required to throw in the towel regardless of society’s obsession with youth or HW’s obsession with not aging. If at 40 you want to learn to ski, learn to crochet, learn to (fill in the blank), I say go for it and let the nay-sayers enjoy bashing you if they so choose.
    Okay, end of rant which is more about ageism then about a poster’s anything-to-down Aniston attitude.

    • Wendy says:

      Contrary to what the media tells you, 40 is actually the best birthday. It’s the “scr*w you, I am who I am and I’m going to enjoy it” birthday. Aniston looks to be living it that way for sure.

      • Shay Kay says:

        I completely agree with you that 40 is the “this is who I am and I’m comfortable with it if you’re not than don’t let the door hit you in the @ss on your way out.”It’s very liberating because suddenly life is less about pleasing anyone except yourself.Jen certainly seems to have found her scr@w you” by not replying to Brad/the media’s “Jen is boring” rant, by saying “babies..don’t know about that now”, by saying “I take jobs that make going to work fun”, in essence she seems to have that really good feel good feeling of knowing and loving who she is.I think certain people just want her to feel like she is “40, desperate, single, insecure, stupid” but fortunately by the time you’re 40 other people’s opinions do not define you.

    • Trek Girl says:

      I completely agree with you.

      I don’t like Jennifer Aniston – I really don’t even think she’s pretty or interesting – , but it’s ridiculous that people say she or other people in their 40’s, 50’s, or older, should thrown in the towel. The people that are saying she should do that might not care about how the look, or like changing up the way they dress, but she does and there is no reason for her to stop, and the same goes for other people, celebrity or not.

    • Wendy says:

      Contrary to what the media tells you, 40 is actually the best birthday. It’s the “scr*w you, I am who I am and I’m going to enjoy it” birthday. Aniston looks to be living it that way for sure.

    • Vesper says:

      Jen is boring at any age.

    • whatevs says:

      i agree one should never stop learning new things. i hate it that some people stop doing and learning new skills, then again those people start being that dull way before age 40. it has nothing to do with one’s age, but with one’s outlook on life. personally i hope to live a long life where i can always discover new, interesting things.

    • Kara Ann says:

      @Wendy, Trek Girl, & Whatevs,

      Thank you ladies for having my back.
      Shows real style and class that there are certain things worth sticking up for no matter what side of the “unholy triangle” that you’re on!

  29. Maritza says:

    The man is hogging the umbrella, that’s not a good sign, he is not thinking about her.

  30. nan says:

    She absorbs the personality of the person she’s dating. If she hooked up with Mr. T she’d be walking around with a mohawk, gold chains and telling everybody “You Damn Fool”!!

  31. cose says:

    It is visible to a gay couple.
    Masculine them with a muscular object.

  32. BELLA says:

    Blah blah..boring,noone cares.He is in it for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(he will realize the $$$$ aint worth it!)

  33. whatevs says:

    why leak this info though? i guess because all blogs and people made fun of her for going to the mexican beaches all the time. so now she goes to the polar opposite of that for her holidays. damn i wish i had her kind of money so i could spend it on stupid shit like p.r. and imagemaking lol. no wait i would spend it on traveling all around the world instead

  34. Original Chloe says:

    I’m amused by the fact that we find out about their low-key, off the radar holiday from a People article reporting on their low-key, off the radar holiday.

    • micha says:

      Yeah…called JA full time PR people.

      • Original Chloe says:

        To be fair, I wouldn’t be surprised if it were Handler’s people leaking all the ‘insider info,’ And I don’t think it will ever be possible for Aniston to get off the pap radar – unless she moves to Utah WITHOUT Handler.

        Not that I pity her very much – she did invite the tab attention by some serious oversharing and overexposure in the last few years, and she *is* the tab princess.

    • MrsB says:

      Handler and Jenny have he same PR staff. that’s real convenient for the
      “details” to get leaked. Isn’t it funny that Jenny always has these big friend get together at holidays instead of actually spending time with her family.

  35. nancy says:

    I’ve always liked JA. She doesn’t have to prove anything to anyone. They look comfortable together. Yes he had a long term girlfriend but from most sources, their relationship was off and on for a long time. I guess it sucks to be her but it doesn’t appear JT was going to marry her. I hope JustJen go the distance.

    • SaucepanWoman says:

      It really annoys me when people lie to excuse Aniston’s actions. Only one source ever claimed Heidi and Justin were ‘off and on’ and that was a tabloid. Justin nor Heidi nor any of their friends said such a thing, on the contrary. In fact, Heidi and her mom both said they were still together, and they were photographed as a couple when Justin and Jen were together. Heidi and Justin lived together, had a life together and a HOME together for 14 years. That is far stronger than a Hollywood ‘marriage’. Justin was committed to Heidi for 14 years so why do people need to diminish Heidi’s role in Justin’s life, just to justify Aniston’s blatant homewrecking? Aniston is a homewrecker and cheater and she deserves for Justin to do the same to her, that she did to Heidi.

      • Wendy says:

        You lost me at the “living together is greater than being married” bit. Plus apparently in your world, she moved in on the first date. Sometimes I wonder if some of you aren’t really Jen fans who, just to make the Brange fans look bad, amuse themselves by posting as incredibly hypocritical Loons who seem to be completely oblivious to how they are EXACTLY what they are accusing someone else of being.

      • nancy says:

        The reality of the situation is that people end their relationships all the time. Justin chose to end his. This doesn’t mean Jennifer “stole” him from Heidi. It seems he chose to start a new life with a woman he considered to be a better lifemate. Neither JA or JT should have to apologize for pursuing their lives together.

      • marcie says:

        Gosh it must be true if her mother said they were together. Her mom was oh nooooooooooooo my 35 yr old baby lost her meal ticket!

      • SaucepanWoman. says:

        I personally think that a relationship of 14 years trumps one of a mere 4 years. And I think many will agree with me. And what are talking about? I never said anything about anyone moving in on the first date. That wasn’t even mentioned at all. Are you one of those Jolie fans trying to make the Aniston fans look delusional?

      • SaucepanWoman. says:

        Nancy as much as you want to convince yourself of that fact to absolve Jen for what she did, it simply is not true. Facts show Justin cheated on Heidi. He didn’t just find someone more compatible, he cheated on someone. You want to defend that.

        Marcie, charming. It says a lot that you have to attack the victim’s mother because you don’t want to acknowledge the truth that Justin and Jen cheated on Heidi and betrayed her.

    • Wendy says:

      Saucepan: when you say they had a life and HOME together for 14 years, that would pretty much imply (aka state outright) that they lived together in that HOME they had together for 14 years.

      And way to go making yourself look like a petty Loon again. Justin and Heidi = 14 years together = 14 years. Jen and Brad together for 7 years = 4 years. What is the point of minimizing their time together when everyone knows differently anyways? At least TRY to be credible, especially when you’re busy saying that marriage is less important than living together, yet you only count the time of Jen and Brad’s marriage and not the time they were actually together, part of which they were … Yes, you guessed it… living together if I’m not mistaken.

      • SaucepanWoman. says:

        Way to turn on the looniston. The loonistons always speak about Aniston and Pitt being MARRIED. And that marriage, a piece of paper, trumps 14 years. The loonistons never talk about 7 years, they talk about Pitt and Aniston’s MARRIED years. So I simply am referring to the terms they dictate. But you knew that didn’t you.

      • Wendy says:

        That’s a pretty thin excuse. If you’re going to only refer to “married” life, then that puts Justin and Heidi at zero, not 14. You don’t get to apply different standards to each in the same equation and not come off as trying to twist the facts.

        I’d be interested to hear how you figure that 14 years in a relationship without the guy (or perhaps it was the girl) committing somehow trumps marriage, which is generally seen as a statement and committment that you want to spend the rest of your life together.

      • nancy says:

        In response to the saucepan: I don’t condone infidelity..but I’m not naive enough to think it doesn’t happen routinely. How JA and JT got together has nothing to do with me. How JT and Bivens fell apart, I have no idea and don’t care. My original post remains the same 9 hrs later, Jennifer and Justin look happy together and I hope they are.

    • MrsB says:

      Heidi and JT were together for 14 years and LIVED together for nearly 6 years. About 1/2 a year longer than Jen’s marriage. Why is it OK to bone someone before they end a committed relationship? Papers or no?

      I guess by your reasoning i would be fin for Justin to be sexing someone other than Jenny right now eh?

      • Wendy says:

        I never said it’s ok. I said that it probably did happen with J&J, and despite Saucepan’s Disney worldview, it also happened with Pitt and Jolie. Neither is ok. I was also pointing out that it’s ridiculous to point to a couple’s denial as somehow being a “fact”.

  36. crazydaisy says:

    You KNOW the sex is hot with these two. Jen’s finally got herself a real man who knows how to calm her down, if you get my drift. And Justin’s got one smokin’ mature babe to do/treat right. Sounds good to me.

    • SaucepanWoman says:

      Yeah because a cheater is apparently a real man who treats women right. smh. He’ll treat her the same way he treated Heidi – dump her as soon as someone better comes along. And she will truly deserve it. Someone should have told Aniston that you lose em how you get em. Karma.

    • Vesper says:

      I don’t get any sense of physical chemistry when I look at Jen and her boy. To me they look like a couple who has been together for years.

  37. valleymiss says:

    I really REALLY like these 2 together. I think this is the guy for Jen. I’ve thought he was hot way back when I saw him in Mulholland Drive! He’s so talented as an actor AND as a writer. Way to go, Jen!

  38. Ella says:

    What’s with the Lil’ Abner fashion?? She likes looking like a ridiculous hick?

  39. study-er says:

    There is something increasingly “off” about Jen’s nose/mouth. It’s like her nose looks more squished to her face, pug-nose style, and her lips keep getting more puckered or something. This is the result of unlimited amounts of money to have work done?

  40. Vesper says:

    I just noticed in the second pic that he’s not even holding her hand. His hand is in his pocket and she is holding on to his back pocket. Yes, he is so into her, not. Some thing about her screams insecurity.

    • Heine says:

      And in a bunch of other pictures, he had her arm around her, pulling her close and in a bunch of others he’s holding her hand.

      No insecurity to be seen in those pics.

  41. justathought says:

    Bet the JJ’s were wearing black while skiing the greens in “Te-hell-ya Ride” !

  42. Maeve says:

    **YAWN**

    Another press release to US Magazine.

    How the mighty have fallen.