Lindsay Lohan crack heisted $15,000 worth of clothes from ‘Scary Movie 5’

I didn’t cover the Lindsay Lohan thing yesterday, because I just didn’t feel like it. Lindsay live-tweeted some dumb nonsense during Monday night’s presidential debate, but really all that she did was try to get some famous people to talk to her via Twitter. It was pathetic – you can read about it here. Meanwhile, Lindsay is back in NYC (clubbing like a crackie), maybe because she’s worried her father will come to her Beverly Hills home (??) again and try to do some kind of cracked-out “intervention”. There’s a new, horrible wrinkle with that too – Michael told TMZ that he “recruited” Dr. Drew for the Cracken Intervention That Never Was. Because it’s not like Lindsay doesn’t already loathe Dr. Drew too – for good reason. The man is a hack. Anyway, Dr. Drew apparently recommended another intervention specialist for Michael, and that’s the dude he brought to Lindsay’s house.

In other Cracken news, Radar reports that she stole $15,000 worth of clothing from the set of Scary Movie 5. Because of course.

Lindsay Lohan has earned the nickname “sticky fingers” again, because a new report claims the troubled actress stole $15,000 worth of clothing from the set of Scary Movie 5!

According to an insider, the clothes were on her wardrobe racks and Lindsay felt entitled to take and keep whatever she wanted.

“It was the talk of the set in Atlanta,” a source told the new issue of the National Enquirer.

“The clothes were on her wardrobe racks. Some nice tops and skirts and other items were gone. I guess Lindsay thought she was entitled to it, like free soap at a hotel. All the other actors knew about it, but the producers just put it down to the price you had to pay for doing business with Lindsay.”

The source also goes on to explain that Lindsay didn’t like the role she was cast in the movie, and only showed up to the set after she was threatened with legal action.

“Even unreliable Charlie Sheen was concerned that Lindsay wouldn’t show up for the September shoot in Georgia,” the source said.

“The wardrobe people were unhappy about the missing clothes, but at the end of the day the producers decided it was more trouble than it was worth to try and get them back.”

[From Radar]

Yeah. Obviously. This happened. The only thing that surprises me is that people are still surprised by Lindsay’s crack-thievery. Every single person in the world should know by now that she’s a crackie klepto. We can beat our breasts about her horrible family and all of that, but you know what? Bitch just likes to steal sh-t. It really is that simple. She likes to steal crap and no one ever makes a fuss about it because they don’t want to deal with her crack antics.

Oh, and I somehow missed this stuff about her “new boyfriend” – a dude named Josh Chunn. He’s a “former cheerleader” and current “fitness trainer” and he’s already talking to the press about her, saying stuff like “I’ve been trying to get Lindsay to focus. But how do you get her to focus with all the stuff going on around her? I can barely focus” and “She’s a strong girl. She’s cleaning up. I just want her to be okay. I want us to be okay.” I guess he’s LA-based, though, so why is she in NYC now? Hm. You can read more about him here.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

60 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan crack heisted $15,000 worth of clothes from ‘Scary Movie 5’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. brin says:

    That’s how she rolls. At this point, anyone who hires her should not be surprised at this.

    • Canda says:

      It’s incredible how everyone is so blase about a “professional actress” stealing tens of thousands of dollars worth of items from her employers. Really, if this was anyone else, we’d all be up in arms and yelling about it. But because this is the crack monster and she gets away with everything, we’ve all just resigned ourselves to the fact that she’s going to do WHATEVER THE HELL SHE WANTS and there will be no repercussions, legal or otherwise. What a disgusting situation.

    • Mimi says:

      I don’t know what is more embarrassing – stealing clothes from movie set or be a “star” of Scary Movie 5 (FIVE!!!).

  2. Diane says:

    Anybody who hires this woman deserves all the problems that she brings. Is this a surprise to anyone? Is this a surprise that she will get off scott free? Just like the producers of Liz and Dick and all the calamities that she brought. The ratings can’t be that great just because of her. This is really getting old. Just like she is looking REALLY old.

  3. Sisi says:

    not surprised at all by this news

    • Ashley says:

      It’s like a never ending cycle: Steal crap, do drugs, drive into someone’s parked car, get some more fillers…

    • Becky says:

      Yeah, but the day this girl cleans up I think I’ll be done with celeb gossip. back in the day celebs ran wild, Brit & co…. Amy terrorizing tourists in st Lucia… tragic endings for sure, but still. this robsten crap is no fun. Lilo is the gift that keeps giving. She has no bottom.

  4. KellyinSeattle says:

    Lindsay Lowhanded

  5. Lem says:

    Only pictures from the set I’ve seen, she wearing lingerie, like above
    This means she must have more than a bedroom scene with sheen. Interesting or not – scary movie 5 – really?

  6. lilred says:

    It’s being chalked up as the price you pay for doing business with Lindsay…then why do business with her there are plenty more cracked out wannabees who would kill to be in her shoes.

  7. Blue says:

    Well if no on ever holds this girl accountable for her crimes and actions why would she change? Everyone knows she’s mess, a thief, drug addict and everything else, but they enable her by giving her work, letting her into their establishment, then don’t pressing charges when she throws drinks and injures people, steals, causes accidents etc. Innocent bystanders who are casualities of her mayhem take the pay offs she or whoever is giving out. There is not incentive for her to change, people always take the money and shut up, charges are never filed and followed through with and she is just not a good human being. She doesn’t care who she hurts because gets away with it.

    • bar world land says:

      ^^^^ so much this.

    • emmie_a says:

      What about the incentive of being a decent human being??? I don’t care who her enablers are or how many chances she’s been given or how entitled she feels — it all comes down to human decency, something I think everyone is born with. She has DECIDED to become this vile despicable person. It’s not even funny anymore.

  8. lizzi says:

    WHO the hell would date her?? EW. this guy needs to get tested STAT.

  9. Nanz says:

    Winona Ryder was caught stealing one time and it ruined her career from which she is just now beginning to recover. Why in hell does this crackie get repeated job offers and attention for being such a shameless POS excuse for a human being?

    • Dana says:

      I’ve thought about that too lately when I’ve seen the photos of Winona on set of her new film. (Plus I think a lot of people have liked Winona through her scandal, I don’t think there are too many that like Lindsay.)

    • Annie says:

      Because Lilo is better at crack networkin’ than Winona. She hangs around like a bad smell begging for roles and it wouldn’t suprise me if she blackmailed people into giving her gigs also. Aside from the klepto streak Winona isn’t nearly such a sleazebag.

    • mln76 says:

      People forget that what ruined her career wasnt the arrest (the industry rallied around her) but that the judge angered by her SNL appearance tagged her with the highest possible class of felony making her imposible to insure in effect killing her career.

      • jwoolman says:

        Winona’s felony was reducible to a misdemeanor a certain time after probation was successfully completed, I think. That’s commonly done in such cases. Lindsay was just lucky that the judge decided to reduce it first, probably since otherwise the case would have gone on and on ad nauseam and the situation in LA makes it really difficult to make an impression on scofflaws anyway. The celebrity-loving sheriff is a major impediment even when the state legislature isn’t messing things up.

    • lucy2 says:

      Great point.
      Though I think part of the difference is that Winona sort of stepped away too, whereas Lindsay will do anything and everything to stay in the spotlight and there are people now willing to take advantage of that for publicity.

    • Becky says:

      And Winona’s career was quite the career – she was a bonifide star with many films under her belt. Lindsay’s was all smoke and mirrors, even though many seem convinced of her enormous talent based on parent trap and mean girls (bitch please).

    • Ann Emmess says:

      Everyone in Hollywood knew about Winona — there were blind items about her shoplifting a good ten years before it finally went public. As I recall, at her career peak there were assistants who were paid just to wait until she left a store and pay for whatever she’d taken. The only real difference is that we know in hindsight that Winona eventually paid consequences for one theft — we won’t know which incident finally brings Lindsey down (or more likely, kills her) until it happens.

  10. Zigggy says:

    I think she tweeted that she has no boyfriend
    Guy just wants publicity

  11. Skipper says:

    Is the boyfriend thing for real or something he and Michael made up?

  12. tru tru says:

    they should have put hidden sencors in the clothes and everytime she wore them out–they go off

    LOL

  13. Apples says:

    I’m betting one of the items was a Calvin Klein black cotton nightgown with lace detail.

    I say this because I have the same nightgown and a few weeks ago she was wearing it- outside, as a top. I was wondering why this dumb b!tch was wearing it like a dress.

  14. The Original Tiffany says:

    Color me shocked! The delicate, sweet flower that is Ms. Lohan has been accused of stealing?

    You know, in NY those charges would be obsolete!

    Actually, I am surprised that the movie even stocked 15K worth of clothes. There are just no words anymore for THIS BITCH.

    • Izzy says:

      Seriously, I can’t even muster the strength to mix up a cracktini at this point. I just can’t, I’m so over this trainwreck.

      • the original bellaluna says:

        I need cracktinis, but for other reasons. At this point, I’m reading Cracken posts for Kaiser’s take (because FUNNY!), the comments, and the interaction with fellow CB’ers.

  15. Boo says:

    Yeah, everyone just assumes she will steal…and resolves to do nothing about it. It isn’t stealing if people expect it of you and do nothing when it happens, is it? In the Cracktionary, it’s only a crime if someone cares enough to press charges, and even then, the crime belongs to the rightful owner, who is accused of lying and wanting money and fame. Quite the little scam she’s got going here–and with full-out cooperation of producers everywhere.

  16. dorothy says:

    Funny how Lohan doesn’t think anything about stealing items. The people that hire her should realize that there’s always fallout from their relationship with her. Stolen items, trailer trashed, hotel bills unpaid…..

  17. Quinn says:

    God…could we please have a NO LOHAN NOVEMBER??? I could give thanks for that!!! I’m worn out with seeing her nasty face.

    • Macey says:

      I second that request, I just cant even stand to look at her any more.

      I wonder if all her stealing and destroying property, throwing drinks on people, etc. will be brought up in the Barbara Walters interview.
      I still would love to know whatever happened with Liz’s trailer that she destroyed. I havent seen anything on it since the reporting.

      • jwoolman says:

        My bet is that LifeTime just paid the full amount for the trashed trailer, if their insurance didn’t cover it. Doesn’t replace the irreplaceables, but at least the woman who loaned it to them wouldn’t have a financial loss and most importantly, would shut up in public about it. Really bad publicity for Liz and Dick, I imagine. I don’t know why a LifeTime movie is causing them so much concern, though. I’ve never seen such noise about one before. They’re just slightly longer tv shows, a good fraction of the time slot will be commercials.

      • Bess says:

        I wonder if Lifetime was even covered by insurance since the Cracken violated the terms of her insurance by driving. She wasn’t allowed to drive and even had a driver provided by Lifetime, but decided to drive anyway. That’s when she rear-ended the tractor trailer.

  18. lower-case deb says:

    that’s all lies.
    she didn’t steal them clothes.
    they followed her home!

    just like the drugs that followed her home and settles in her nose cavity. the macbook that freedives into her birkin-of-questionable-past.

    just like the various unsupsecting cars and knees and feet that followed her around and can’t step aside causing some regretable accidents.

    she is the Pied Piper of Crakelin, anyway.

    coming to theaters near you.

  19. dcypher1 says:

    Crackie is as crackie dose! klepto 5 finger discount lohan thats what u get for dealing with her lowlife no class ass.

  20. Madpoe says:

    Why is she three toned?
    Her face, neck and hand colors don’t match.
    Bitch is shady!

    • Annie says:

      In some pics from this set it actually looks as if her face has come adrift from her skull – creepy!

  21. Samantha says:

    Lindsay Lohan should not be allowed within a 10 feet radius of any movie set,how and why does any person in Hollywood even consider casting this crackhead is totally bewildering.

  22. hillbillyinthecorner says:

    You know how they know she took the cloths ?………..
    Because she like to wear them for photo shots …sort of like sticking your tongue out and saying…NAW NA NA NAW NA …I stole your cloths and you can’t go a dam thing about it….
    As Most of them are getting a lot of use right now…since most were negligees and underwear…entertaining the Arab Nations Millionares Club members….

  23. lucy2 says:

    Wardrobe? Please. I’m surprised she didn’t steal the cameras and drive them off in a catering truck (crashing it 3 times along the way, of course).

  24. Jackson says:

    When are these wardrobe people going to wise up and start buying her clothes from Walmart? (No offense to Walmart shoppers.) They know she’s going to lift the stuff so just buy her cheap clothes and let her go about her crack-thievery.

  25. mkyarwood says:

    That kind of thing makes it clear she doesn’t know what year it is.

  26. Paloma says:

    Don’t forget her stealing a necklace, walking out of a jewelry store wearing it. Hollywood, quit hiring her!

  27. skuddles says:

    Disgusting crackhead THIEF.

  28. the original bellaluna says:

    “but the producers just put it down to the price you had to pay for doing business with Lindsay.” This sums it up precisely.

    See, H-Weird? THIS is what happens when you choose to do business with The Cracken!

    And she’s not even clever about it! It’s BLATANT!!!

  29. jwoolman says:

    About the difference in career-hit for Winona and Lindsay: Well, if you go back and read the record- Winona was pretty blatant about it. She went into the store with shoplifting gear, it wasn’t any spur of the moment thing. Lindsay’s method for the jewelry theft was much simpler: she and her bud danced around the store, wearing out the clerk after hours by asking to see a lot of stuff, then she whipped the necklace around her neck so only the clasp was visible (after 45 minutes wearing it), put her own two necklaces over it and waltzed out of the store looking like the cat who swallowed the canary. She did the necklace flip thing again when caught by a photographer wearing it a week later, so to this day there are probably people wondering how it could retail for $2500 since they’ve never seen the front. I do think Lindsay planned it, but she also did it in such a way that if caught on her way out the door, she could get away with “oops, I’m so absent-minded”. Lindsay even did a dry run for that approach earlier in the same store with an earring. There was no room for that kind of thinking the way Winona did it.

    So both Winona and Lindsay, despite both getting caught and convicted, are chronic and unremorseful thieves who will always have to be watched in all contexts. Both of them undoubtedly stole many times before getting caught, that’s typical for shoplifters and both showed skills honed by considerable experience. Winona was treated more realistically by the courts, however. That did convince her to retire for a while, but maybe she has more family support than Lindsay. The convictions probably slowed them both down as far as stealing from merchants is concerned, but neither seems to have dealt with the underlying issues leading them to such behavior. At the moment, Lindsay seems to be back to stealing from friends and employers, but maybe she just hasn’t been caught stealing from stores again yet. But word gets around in the industry and she will continue to limit her future opportunities with every stupid thing she does: stealing, delaying production, squeezing more money out of those kind enough to employ her by threatening who knows what, etc. Lindsay is a risk taker, and that will do her in eventually. She hadn’t even figured out that it would be wise to stay squeeky clean while on probation. I mean really – who only does only 21 hours of community service in 6 months when they have 480 hours to complete in a year? Who gets fired from CS for no shows and leaving early?!? Who gets off easy on a felony level DUI plus carjacking plus reckless driving and harrassment, and then doesn’t bother to complete the Drunk Ed course on time in the manner instructed by the judge? The girl is not rational.

    • NerdMomma says:

      I love a thorough analysis 🙂

      Here’s another difference between the two. At the time Ryder was arrested, she was a huge name in Hollywood, and one could assume wildly wealthy with tons of clothes and things given to her for free. Lohan’s shoplifting seems different in that she really can’t afford nice things and no one wants to give her clothes and jewelry anymore.

      So I assume Ryder did it for the thrill, and it’s even harder for me to understand why she disappeared.

      • Bread and Circuses says:

        Someone said up-thread that the judge made certain Winona got saddled with a criminal record that disrupted her ability to be insured for movie roles. That’s what killed her career temporarily.

        Lindsay has had issues with the same thing. There’s too much money at stake in movies; you don’t get the role if you can’t be insured.

  30. Ryan says:

    I’m just surprised to hear they had at least $15,000 in the budget for this movie.

  31. Sugar says:

    In other cracken news today… LOL and now for the crack weather.
    brace yourselves NY she’s back and LAPD say your serve.

  32. mln89 says:

    do ANY of the lohans have ANY dignity? of course lindsay was stealing, she has no shame and can’t be bothered to stop herself from being a klepto, even though she almost went to prison last year for the same damn thing : stealing shit that didn’t belong to her! and why can’t her parents have some dignity and stop putting out press releases about each other and their daughter. the fact that her father contacted a doctor she hates for help and THEN gives all the details of this “intervention” to tmz…i mean what in the blue fuck is he thinking? first of all it, shoots any chance of him looking credible and like he sincerely gives a rat’s ass about her welfare. second, she JUST cut him off for talking to a gossip website. now her NEW boyfriend is talking to the press about her?!? is there anyone in her life (including herself) who isn’t a craven, dysfunctional famewhore? good god, these people are all kinds of fucked up.