Ugh, really? For real, Vanity Fair? On the September issue, arguably the most important issue of any magazine? This is the cover of Vanity Fair’s September issue – Princess Diana, re-using a photo (now majorly cropped) from Mario Testino’s 1997 photo shoot. I believe that this was Diana’s last formal photo shoot, and she did do it for Vanity Fair/Testino – as a way to promote the auction of her old dresses for charity. Now the shoot is being reused, 16 years later, for VF’s September issue. It’s not even like they’re pairing this reprint with a really interesting story either – the cover story is just about how Diana was in love with Hasnat Khan. We already knew that!
Vanity Fair contributing editor Sarah Ellison reports in the September issue on Princess Diana’s 1995-to-1997 relationship with Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan. Jemima Khan, Diana’s close friend and the former wife of Hasnat’s distant cousin Imran Khan, tells Ellison, “Diana was madly in love with Hasnat Khan and wanted to marry him, even if that meant living in Pakistan, and that’s one of the reasons why we became friends.”
Many close to Diana say her relationship with Khan was the most significant after Prince Charles, but beyond a secret romance, it was her shot at a normal life. The forthcoming film Diana, starring Naomi Watts as Di, focuses on the last two years of her life and specifically her relationship with Khan, who has not cooperated with the filmmakers.
Jemima Khan tells Ellison that Diana “came to visit me twice in Pakistan to help fund-raise for Imran’s hospital, but both times she also went to meet his family secretly to discuss the possibility of marriage to Hasnat. She wanted to know how hard it had been for me to adapt to life in Pakistan.”
Friends tell Ellison that Diana made a point to get to know Khan’s family, specifically seeking the approval of his mother, Naheed. For a “son to marry an English girl is every conservative Pashtun mother’s worst nightmare,” Jemima tells Ellison. “You send your son to be educated in England and he comes back with an English bride. It’s something they dread.”
On one visit to Pakistan, Diana spent time with Imran’s sisters, Aleema and Rhanee, and in order to avoid press attention, they decided to drive themselves to the family’s home in the Model Town neighborhood of Lahore—Diana knew the address by heart. Stuck in a traffic jam, Aleema realized they were with the mother of the future King of England without bodyguards or drivers, “like sitting ducks.” As people began to recognize Diana, pointing toward the car and waving, “she was entirely unflappable . . . she rolled her window down, smiled, and waved.”
As the relationship progressed, Diana and Hasnat discussed marriage, and she told two friends Ellison spoke with that she wanted a daughter with him. Diana discreetly looked into finding someone to secretly marry them, but Khan was “horrified” by the plan, causing her to see “all these pitfalls looming,” says Richard Kay, a Daily Mail journalist and close friend of Diana’s who spoke to Ellison. Khan told police in his official interview following Diana’s death that “I thought it was a ridiculous idea” and that he “told her that the only way I could see us having a vaguely normal life together would be if we went to Pakistan, as the press don’t bother you there.”
Shortly after Diana was introduced to Dodi Al Fayed by Al Fayed’s father, Mohamed, her relationship with Khan began to fall apart. Diana’s friend Rosa Monckton, the former managing director of Tiffany & Co., disapproved of Mohamed Al Fayed as a traveling companion for Diana and advised her not to vacation with his family. Diana told Monckton that Hasnat had broken off their relationship and that Dodi was going to give her a ring and that it was “going firmly on my right hand.” According to Monckton, the two talked much more about Hasnat than they did Dodi. She firmly believes to this day that Diana’s relationship with Dodi was designed to make Hasnat jealous.
The friends of Diana with whom Ellison spoke insist that she had broken off the relationship out of frustration that Hasnat wouldn’t agree to marry, or even to go public. Says Jemima: “He hated the thought of being in the glare of publicity for the rest of his life.”
But the surgeon’s discretion may have been his greatest gift to Diana, Ellison writes. “Everybody sells me out,” Diana told a friend the summer of her death. “Hasnat is the one person who will never sell me out.”
Basically, this is all stuff you would have known if you’ve read one or two Diana books. Am I alone in that? Because I really liked The Diana Chronicles and Paul Burrell’s book, and both of those books had all of this information to varying degrees. I really just think that Vanity Fair needs to stop putting so many dead celebrities on their covers, especially if they don’t even have a unique story to tell about said dead celebrity.
Photos courtesy of Mario Testino/Vanity Fair.
When will they get over putting dead celebrities on their covers?
I’m really surprised at the lack of “Diana’s grandson” magazine covers.
The magazines like the “princess” with the fashions. You don’t see that many Prince William or Prince Harry covers unless they get drunk. So not too many Prince George or Diana’s grandson. If Kate had given birth to a girl it would be back to back covers of the “Little Princess” and her first blanket outfit. LOL.
+1 Totally. My question is… who owns your image? Can a magazine really put anyone they want on their cover… dead or alive without getting permission and paying the person, or their estate?
Any lawyers out there who know?
Whoever has rights to the photos can use them. Generally that’s the photographer or the publication that they are hired by (but not always). I’m guessing that either Testino/VF have the rights and therefore don’t need permission from anyone to use them.
She was not celebrity, she was Princess Diana loved world-wide then and still today <3
I actually love VF and all their “dead celebrity”-covers but I agree that the story about them has got to be new or at least unique. Everybody knows about Diana and Hasnat Khan…
Good for Vanity Fair.
I’ll read it (never read a Diana book/biography) but I think it’s tacky.
+1
Well, I for one, didn’t know about Hasat. So that’s news to me. But honestly, they try to make money off of Diana, which she complained about according to this article.. Let her rest in peace.
The article seems to contain nothing new. It IS cheap.
and this came right on the heels of Kate Middleton’s and Will’s baby. Vanity Fair please, just stop.
Vanity Fair has been in slippery mode for a while now. Did they change editors or something? I’m too lazy to look but would love to know.
That being said, I’m reminded again that Diana was an exquisitely striking woman, you don’t find that grace anymore, not even in celebrities. The women who have it are not being photographed or are unknown for sure.
However, when it comes to tabloid and magazine covers, I have the same feeling for Diana as I do for Marilyn Monroe. Iconic but ultimately tragic lives, adored by the public but fighting demons in private… We will never forget about them, but it’s time to let them rest in peace.
Peace is long overdue and so well-deserved.
ITA she was stunning.
And she’s been gone for a long time. Give it a rest everybody!
While I think it’s tacky to put Diana on the cover now, it’s interesting to compare her to everyone else on the covers today.
Despite the frosted hair and heavy mascara, Diana looks SOOOOOOO natural compared with other celebs today.
I remember seeing these photos when they were first released and thinking how beautiful Diana looked in them. They still look stunning, she looks so fresh and natural.
Well said Melissa. Still miss Diana though, she was lovely.
These photos make me realise how young she really was when she died. I was almost 21 at the time.
VF should at least pretend to be above that sort of thing
Agreed.
What the hell is going on at VF? Did they fire all their writers because of the economy and decided ‘hey, everybody loves her; what could go wrong?’ — it’s quite a disappointment.
They’re just really capitalizing on her newborn grandchild. The timing is not a coincidence. Di is on everyone’s minds right now*.
*’Royal watchers’ etc.
I think it’s more to do with the Naomi Watts Diana movie, which is centered on Diana’s relationship with Khan.
HA! I forgot about that, I think you’re right. A double-whammy.
Which just makes me relieved again that Kate/Wills didn’t have a girl. I’m willing to bet VF had a article already written (Diana’s grandaughter-what would she have thought) and they had to toss in this old story about her ex at the last minute. They’ve turned into a tabloid.
The pictures are stunning though.
She was so beautiful and so beloved. I don’t think we’ve seen the last of her on magazine covers. So sad that she isn’t here to see her grandson. May she forever rest in peace.
I remember looking at a magazine rack and seeing her on the cover of Vanity Fair not long before her death, and thinking how amazing she looked. I didn’t even recognize her at first. She looked great that summer, healthy and happy.
I like Princess Diana but I would rather have seen Naomi Watts on the cover for her Diana movie. I’ve stopped reading Vanity Fair because they put way too many dead celebs on their cover. Boring!
And creepy…
Yeah tacky, especially the timing.
We all know both Charles and Diana had affairs, we all know everyone loved Diana.
But to do this right after the birth of Will’s son? Really?
Let Will and Kate have the limelight with the new baby for a while. Let Kate enjoy new mother accolades and Will enjoy being a father. Diana had her time showing off Royal heirs – it’s their time.
If you like them or not, don’t take away from new parents – especially for profit.
This is like elbowing
Very poor taste of VF. And old news, all second-hand, about someone who’s not around to defend herself.
She was so stunning.
I agree.
If they had just done a photo spread on her with no story, say in light of her grandson being born last week, I think it would have been easier to accept. Dragging up former lovers is tacky.
She really was absolutely gorgeous.
Yes and now little George can look this up and see all the juicy gossip on his grandmother published on the event of his birth.
Way to honor his grandmother VF! Or at least pretend to.
So tabloidy!
But didn’t she just have “it”? It makes me feel bad for royals who don’t (side-eye Waity). Harry has “it”, Sheikha Mozah has “it” – Diana was just so magnetic.
Sheikha Mozah is amazing. I have been at several events with her and the room literally falls to a hush when she enters. Such magnetism!
OMG! I’m dying an totally jealous! She is my style icon. I really feel like she is unrivaled in her beauty and grace right now!
Just looked her up… actually in this case I prefer Lalla Salma of Morocco. She does dazzling modern styles as well as fully traditional 🙂
I hate to ruin the conversation but I hope you realise these women are wives of autocratic rulers.
A few years back Sheikha Mozah rocked a pair of glass heeled fur trimmed shoes on a visit with the Queen of England. I thought the shoes were so unexpected, frivolous yet daring.
I think I have found a link for the shoes:
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2010/10/27/1288212765371/sheikha-mozars-shoes-006.jpg
It’s tacky but it’s nice to see the pictures again. I forget how much she just sparkled. You’re right. She just had “it” whatever that was. Because even though her facial features are a bit plain, she as a whole was truly beautiful and stunning and even in these pictures, that shows through.
Agreed. This photo shoot in particular was amazing. I remember gasping out loud when I first saw these shots because she’d never looked so beautiful or radiant to me. So tragic that they were her last.
Definitely. I was never really into royal anything so never paid much attention to Diana but what I remember most about her was that magnetic glow she exuded. It’s so evident in the photos here…charisma in spades.
@Leen, i can only speak for what i know of Sheikha Mozah, but she is not a silenced wife hiding in the shadows of an autocratic husband. Her Highness is a very outspoken, progressive leader with a compelling vision for Qatar’s future, and a role model for women in Qatar and the GCC region. She broke tradition to become such a public figure, and I personally know how hands on she is in leading high profile initiatives in Qatar and the region. Also, Her Highness’ husband is no longer the ruler – he abdicated last month and put his and Sheikha Mozah’s 2nd son in charge, becoming one of the youngest monarchs at 32 years old.
William really inherited many features from her.
When he spoke to the media outside the hospital, he had a few expressions and mannerisms that were just like Diana’s. Though she certainly had some flaws (as do we all), I think her sons carry on her looks and caring spirit (I see that part in Harry).
Too bad he didn’t inherit her work ethic.
it’s funny but i always think he looked more like his cousin Prince William of Gloucester but with Diana’s smile and floppy hairstyle.
http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m88nnmMrsC1qg0umko1_500.jpg
Since the Windsor genes kicked in, all i see is Prince Edward. Although the Diana smile is still there.
Boy, I don’t see that at all, LAK. He sometimes looks like Diana; not as much as he used to. The photo where he was looking down at the baby looked just like her. Almost like Diana was looking at him through William.
Question LAK, what happens to Camilla if Charles were to die while reigning? There’s no way she is going to spend one day ruling Britain, right? Does she keep her title?
One ironclad rule about consorts which applies to Camilla and Kate is that they will NEVER, EVER rule, no matter the circumstances.
If Camilla outlives Charles, she will be the DOWAGER of all his titles at the time of death. DOWAGER is the term one gives to widows of titles.
Of course we might be polite about it and simply call her Queen [or whatever title she holds at the time] as we did for Mary [consort of George V] and Alexandra [Consort of Edward VII] rather than calling them Dowager Queen Mary or Dowager Queen Alexandra.
He has her way of dropping his chin down to his neck and then raising his eyes up–a sort of bashful glancing up at someone.
I have to say, I just loved her–I feel like I grew up with her. I feel like many women my age learned, along with Diana, that fairy tales really don’t exist and you have to look after yourself. I was so heartbroken that her life was cut short.
Also, so admire her for not shunning AIDS and HIV patients and making the public aware that just touching them didn’t spread the illness. Prior to her publicity, they were treated like pariahs.
Agree. She was so genuine with her charity work and that seems to be overlooked at times.
The head down but glancing up part was exactly what reminded me of his mother. He doesn’t resemble her as much as he once did, but those few moments were so much like his mother.
Man, she was beautiful though. I’m not at all interested in royal shenanigans, but I never tire of looking at pictures of her in that post-separation period.
Here is my true story about just how shocking her death was to everyone at the time. The night she died, I was in hospital having a 1.5 litre (honestly) pleural effusion being slowly removed by a chest drain. I was only an adolescent but I’d just been diagnosed with Hodgkins Lymphoma and was in a big ol’ mess. Despite all that, the nurses woke me up at 4am when the news started trickling through. I was the only patient on the ward with a TV (NHS dormitory-style ward but I had a side room because I was a kid in crisis and they thought I needed privacy). So it was me, my chest drain, a load of nurses, and BBC News. I almost forgot I had cancer!
I, too, was in the hospital that night! I was in labor with my son, then up all night just because, evidently, so I watched the whole thing also. Her funeral was the first night I was home with baby, so again, I was up all night and watching it too. Such a tragic story.
Sad memory Sixer, but happy you are still with us!
“… Khan, who has not cooperated with the filmmakers.”
This speaks actually in his favor.
Its a true story,his family is very conservative,and people know it by heart in Paksitan.Dr.Hasnat does no talk to anyone about Di.
Vanity Fair has gone to shit. They are trying to battle with the tabloids. Just like People Mag did. I dropped People now I drop VF. They obviously put Diana on the cover because of the birth of the baby. But their interviewers now are horrible and self serving; nothing new or interesting. In fact they are even quoting tabloid rumors and gossip.
Disappointed. I bought my last issue a few years ago.
(and isnt Pipster on the payroll now too? weird)
It’s insulting to the current crop of movie stars, but also telling that VF constantly gets better sales by putting old school icons on their covers. They don’t make ’em like they used to!
She was stunning, WITHOUT all this crayon like photoshop being used on her photos. She didnt need it then, doesnt need it now! It actually does her injustice.
But on another toic, I can;t ever get tired of seeing her, no matter how old the pictures are.
I was just thinking those pix of her look so classic and pretty. Not out of date or anything at all in my opinion. Makes me long for the days before Terry Rchardson was doing his godawful work.
The use of her picture is somewhat tacky, but the article is what brings the tackiness full circle. What would have been awesome is if they did an influential women issue and had multiple covers of women past and present. For example, Diana, Hilliary Clinton, Oprah, Queen Rania, Queen Noor, Margaret Thatcher, the list could go on and on. Narrowing it down would have been tough, but that would have been lovely.
Jemima’s name has got me wishin’ for some pancakes. oh well. 😛
*chomping into my bacon, egg & cheese on a roll*
LOLOLOL thank you for the chuckle 🙂
Gosh, she was so gorgeous, though! Natural beauty, too. Inside and out.
These photos are a reminder of how stunning she was. She had timeless style by the mid-1990s and seemed to be much more confident.
I was pretty young when she died, so I only really remember Diana in the last years of her life. As I commented below, she always seemed so sophisticated and glamorous to me. Was she always so stylish, or is this something that developed after she got out of her marriage to Charles?
My personal take is that her most timeless formal and casual looks came along post-divorce. She could wear khakis and an Oxford shirt on one of her charity missions and look great. Her hair and clothing from those last years just remain timeless.
In the 1980s, she did favor very feathered hair and frills. And I was one of many school-age girls who copied her look. Some copied rocker chicks, but some of us tried to imitate Diana. I still take cues from her in terms of simplicity and trying not to follow temporary trends that will look dated in 5 or 10 years.
I really love what Diana’s wearing in that top photo. Even after all these years, her clothing looks classic and beautiful, not dated. Diana was so stylish and glamorous. I wish Kate would wear something a little more glamorous or sophisticated from time to time. No more peter pan collars!
Diana will be like Marilyn Monroe. She’ll be covering magazines for decades more. Tragic figures who never found love or sustained it but were beautiful and broken. They’ll always have that mystic that will draw people to them.
They plan these cover stories months in advance so they must have known this one would coincide with the arrival of Diana’s first grandchild. Cheap and tacky and the timing is lousy.
Hey! Diana copied Miley’s hairstyle!!!
HAAAAAAA!!! I was hoping someone would write this 🙂
Still so taken by how much of a natural beauty this lady is.
I find this very tacky. Yes, they are trying to cash in on Prince George. If they wanted to promote the movie they should have put Naomie Watts on the cover.
She was a beautiful woman.. I never realized how much Will looks like his mom. That being said, it’s inappropriate on the heels of the new baby. The one thing that stands out to me, was her incessant use of the press when it suited her. I don’t think either of her sons would want her exploited again. This is really crass.
I did not know much about this lover, just the last noted one, wow!
I like the photo but I think this is also PR for the film that is coming out soon.
I shook Diana’s hand when she came to Chicago yrs ago, so full of grace.
How utterly tacky. Let the woman rest in peace.
Yes give me Princess Di and Audrey Hepburn any day if the week over the boring celebs VF often puts in the covers such as the very stupid issue of Judd Apatow it the one with LiLo. That being said I know I am in the very minor minority but Princess Di was a mess and bad for the royal family. She was such a baby and even involved Wills in her domestic drama at times. So tacky. Still I obsessed with her.
Diana was a mess but she certainly was not bad for the royal family. She challenged them, frustrated them, angered them, impressed them and ultimately forced them to change with the times. This was not her plan but she managed to do what no one else could have done – show the royals that they were impossibility out of touch with the people. Will, Kate, Harry, Beatrice, Eugenie and all the rest of the royals are better off because Diana gave the monarchy a layer of grace, glamour and humanity it never had before.
You make a good point and you are probably right, in a way she actually saved the royal family.
@t – and actually Kate and Harry’s future wife will benefit from Diana’s legacy because the royals don’t want to be seen causing them any misery or duress. Nor would Wills and Harry stand for it because of what their mom went through. If it weren’t for the impeccable reputation Di had as a warm, involved, hands-on mother then royal convention would have dictated that Kate raise little George in a detached manner full of nannies, governesses and servants. They will be in the picture, of course, but Diana’s parenting style will follow through to raising her grandson. She was truly a royal game changer.
I always love looking at pictures of Diana. She was breathtakingly beautiful.
Absolutely love love LOVE the fourth pic (in the black dress) so beautiful and happy.
So beautiful! I have not read any the books, so this was news to me also. I remember being glued to the tv the day she married Charles. I have no problem with this cover, she will always be iconic.
I have great respect for Hasnat Khan, who has managed to keep his mouth shut and his dignity intact over all these many years.
Geez, VF, you couldn’t let the man have some privacy? It’s been a long time now and he’s moved on, maybe the media should too.
That said, these photos were by far the best of her later years.
Can’t believe a highlight is “The Mystery Man Who Stole the Princess’s Heart”…terrible. Undignified. But for everyone’s entertainment if you are into Bollywood music, literally, this song beautifully captures the emotion attempted with this reselling of Diana’s love story : http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HvY9nHIAneg&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DHvY9nHIAneg. “You Stole My Heart” is the translation…
This past Christmas a friend gave me a subscription to VF. I have been dissapointed with every single issue (aside from a handful of good articles). VF used to be such a good magazine. With this & the Brad Pitt cover (they didnt even interview him! & the Pippa article was beyond moronic) I won’t renew my subscription. Never cared for any of the RF, & poor Diana seemed like a mess. Beautiful, down to earth & great mum, but she was a rare gem. Let her RIP please! Wills & Kate are bland as dirt. Can’t stand any of them.
I think all magazines have become so disappointing–mostly full of fluff pieces and ads. I subscribed to The Smithsonian a couple of years ago on a whim because I remembered enjoying the magazine when I was a young adult. It was nothing but ads and the “articles” where just essays, really–not something you’d expect from their magazine. Plus, they annoyed the crap out of me via email and snail mail. I won’t even subscribe to a magazine on my e-reader because I’ve come to loathe them all and only read them if I’m in a waiting room.
I got my son a subscription to National Geographic for his birthday one year. Within 1 month, I was receiving 3-10 pieces of junk mail magazine subscriptions a week. It lasted 18 months after the 1-year subscription expired. Never again will I get a subscription. I had the same problem with books ordered through the school book club, but at least they ended with the school year.
I have the original VF that had these photos. The original published shots were amazing. Absolutely no need to photoshop them as they’ve done above.
vis a vis the articles, i tend to skip all the celebrity puff pieces. those have always been bad. Much more interesting are the various columnists. I see Michael Lewis has an article. definitely looking forward to reading that. Michael is very good writer on financial/Wall street type articles.
Fun factoid – Michael Lewis’s book ‘the big short’ was the inspiration for WALL STREET.
I have the same issue and agree the retouching was in poor taste (actually I find the whole cover/feature in poor taste).
Also in agreement on Michael Lewis. The columnists are what keep my subscription active these days.
Gorgeous cover and pics. Diana was a beauty.
Isn’t Pippa doing some “writing” for VF now? So sad and shameless to exploit people’s love for Di’s memory.
I never knew anything about this. I thought the guy she died with was the love of her life.
I love the pics
This may not be popular but if she was only with Dodi Fayed to make Hasnet Khan jealous, then that makes her death all the more tragic. . . if that’s even the best word to use.
Sigh. I miss Diana. I know she had her issues… but I loved her anyway.
I’ll never forget the night she died. My mom cried, which I didn’t quite understand then. I was glued to the TV for hours. I stayed up all night watching the coverage.
Sometimes, it’s still hard to believe she’s gone.
Same here. There is a great moment in the movie “The Bachelorette” I saw recently where Kirsten Dunst and her girlfriends recall the day Diana died. Kirsten’s character dismisses any mention of it as “too soon, too soon.” 🙂 Can’t believe its been over 15 years.
love that movie.
I did not know about this guy either, maybe having no easy access to the Internet in the months after she passed helped. I’m glad he has not spoken to the press. Rest in peace…
I remember some tabloid coverage at the time, but he was very low key, seemingly the opposite of her last beau.
There was alot of press coverage about him around the time of his death, but he refused to co-operate.
Then again at her very public inquest several years later when we learnt alot more detail about it all.
oops typo. HER death.
I agree with all of the comments about how beautiful and classic she looked in the last year or two of her life. Timeless beauty and radiant happiness. I agree her style is so classic here. And V.F. has been on a downhill slide for a while, hence the Lilo coverage and this article, bad taste.
IMO let the dead RIP.
I’m actually more interested in reading about trouble in Martha Stewart’s kitchen rather than a rehash of some dead person’s romance.
I find Diana fascinating – I always have and I probably always will – but I don’t find her to have been a particularly tragic figure: She lived a life of unimaginable privilege. It’s true that she had serious mental problems, but most people with serious mental problems do not have the resources she had. They, not Diana, deserve the moniker of “tragic figure.” The amount of sympathy she receives from the general public is, in my opinion, sadly misplaced.
It’s a movie promotion for Naomi Watts’ movie. Are you giving her shade for playing Diana? Do Marilyn Monroe covers bother people? There’s another icon who died tragically at the same age.
Diana’s family doesn’t like it; I get that, but Diana is in the public domain and they make money off her. Althorp is all about Diana. Arguably her son uses her when it suits him. So why should be a VF cover on the anniversary of her death and promoting a movie be a big deal? (Personally they should have used Naomi Watts, but that’s just me.)
I think it’s thoroughly exploitative, tacky, and unimaginative. The poor woman is dead. If they’d done an article about her charity work, I would have a different opinion. But is this all women have to look forward to being remembered for? Love affairs? Like there’s nothing else in our lives? How Twilight can you get.
i wish she was alive.
maybe this is some kind of promo or preparation for the Diana-movie with Naomi Watts? They all dig for the old story now. This is only the beginning…
I see nothing wrong at all with them putting her on the cover; she was a timeless beauty and, to this day, loved by many. But I do think it’s rather cheesy of them to trot out that Hasnat story like it’s news to anyone…
Well, money or not for the magazine, I think Diana would have loved to be remembered. I like seeing her again. She was a very special person, I think.
So what happened to the Gwyneth Paltrow hatchet job, that was supposed to be in this issue wasn’t it?
I miss her so much. She was a beauty.
I’ve always been on the fence about Diana’s looks, but that second picture really just grabs you. Beautiful.
I love Diana. I know she had her faults, but I love her. I was heartbroken at her death and even more so now that Prince George is here. She would have loved that baby so very much.
I think this story is tacky. As someone mentioned upthread, a pictorial “look back” would have been way classier if this is their idea of celebrating (taking advantage of) the new baby.
And what’s up with the photoshopping?? Good grief, this woman definitely doesn’t need it!
Off topic just a bit, but I can’t believe that Dodi Al-Fayed’s famewhore father hasn’t released a public statement either about the upcoming movie or the first grandchild of Diana.
Mother Teresa died a few days later but the press was all about Diana’s funeral. Diana would have loved all the attention she got.
And this is why I can’t stand Vanity Fair. They are so effing boring and stale. I love Diana to death, but even I think the editors were phoning it in here and not bothering to be creative at all. If its not dead white celebrities, it’s boring white milquetoast starlets nobody knows or cares about. No wonder the magazine industry has been suffering, because now people can create digital magazines and blogs where they can see people and stories that relate to them.
My brother suggested I may like this blog. He was entirely right. This put up truly made my day. You cann’t imagine just how a lot time I had spent for this info! Thanks!
Next month…..It’s Jackie O!!!!!!