Jennifer Aniston had a supporting part in Horrible Bosses, a raunchy R-rated comedy in 2011. I never saw the film, but I’m assuming she had about the same amount of screen time as Kevin Spacey and Colin Farrell, the other two “horrible bosses” in the film. Aniston played the predatory sexpot psycho boss to Charlie Day’s character. Anyway, the film was a financial success so of course they’re making another one. Christoph Waltz and Chris Pine have been added to the cast (as more “horrible bosses” I believe) and Aniston and Spacey are reprising their roles as well. The Daily Mail just got their hands on the script and they’re trying to get all the clicks by using phrasing like “Jennifer Aniston… bisexual… addiction…schlong.” I guess I should throw up a SPOILERS here. SPOILERS for Horrible Bosses 2:
As Jennifer Aniston gets older, she just seems to get better… and more risque. Hot off her daring turn as a stripper in We’re The Millers, the 44-year-old will be heating up screens again for Horrible Bosses 2 by playing a sex addict who goes on a wild binge.
Her character, randy dentist Julia Harris, seduces not just two men, but also a woman, MailOnline has learned exclusively after obtaining a copy of the script. The sequel starts with Jennifer’s character Julia meeting up with Jason Bateman’s character Nick Hendricks during a sex addiction meeting held at her dental office.
He calls goes by the name ‘Blanston’ so that she won’t figure out he is the friend of her assistant Dale Arbus, played by Charlie Day. Jason’s Nick acts like he is an addict too so that he can fit in with the group. Things get weird when she asks him what his trigger is and he uncomfortably says, ‘Ladies, bosoms, and their back sides. Tight sweaters and undergarments.’
When Aniston’s Julia looks bored with that comment, he tells a story about how he felt up a pantiless flight attendant in attempt to gain her attention. She seems bored again so he mentions a guy being there too. She suddenly perks up, saying ‘Meeting adjourned,’ then kicks everyone out of her office. She then ‘pushes Nick into a chair, kisses him and grinds on him,’ per the script. Julia tells him, ‘God that story was hot. I’ve got a little story for you Blanston. Don’t move.’
The fetching dentist then says from another room, ‘In preparation for landing I need your shlong in a locked and upright position’ then steps out in a very skimpy flight attendant costume, the kind girls wear at Playboy mansion Halloween parties. She starts kissing him, taking off his clothes, then jumps on him. The script strongly hints the two sleep together.
That’s quite a sexy scene for Jennifer and Jason, who in real life are such good friends they double date with her fiancé Jason Sudekis and his wife Amanda Anka. In the next scene, when Nick meets up with his friends, it’s clear he has slept with Aniston’s Julia as script notes say he has a ‘beaming glee.’ He tells his friend Dale, who Jennifer’s Julia sexually harassed in the first Horrible Bosses, ‘You’re crazy for not treating yourself to at least one helping of that.’
Toward the end of the movie, Julia then tries to seduce Dale again but this time she’s successful. When he asks her why she’s always after him, she tells him his ‘c–k is like a trophy’ and she wants it for her mantle. The beauty seals the deal when she blackmails him and he hesitantly caves in. Dale, who is happily married, feels awful about the affair and is worried his wife will leave him if she finds out. But in Jennifer’s last scene in the film, she is seen with his wife and it’s made clear she has seduced her as well as the two touch each other lovingly and have pleased smiles on their faces.
In Jennifer’s four scenes in the film, she manages to bed three people, which must be a record for her career. This is quite a role for the former Friends actress who has built her empire on playing sweet girls-next-door like Jenny in Marley & Me and Katherine in Just Go With It.
Wearing sexy outfits isn’t anything new for the Emmy winner, however. She donned a naughty French maid get-up for Friends With Money and a fetching Princess Leia bikini costume from Star Wars for Friends. Horrible Bosses 2 was shot in Los Angeles in November and December. Her We’re The Millers co-star Jason Sudekis and Kevin Spacey are also in the movie.
She only has 4 scenes in the film? Well, it is an ensemble comedy and Jason Sudeikis, Charlie Day and Jason Bateman are the leads. I have no doubt that Bateman will be funny in this and anything he does, but Aniston as the raunchy seductress? Eh. Can I still get some eye-rolls, hair flips and waved hands please? What am I saying? Those are already in her actress’s bag of tricks. Anyway, I’m sure Aniston picked up a nice paycheck for only four scenes. It’s probably more money than I’ll ever see, so the joke’s on me.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
Cancel the film, the script has leaked!
This sounds definately worth postponing your wedding for.
Haha!! LOL!
ITA! 4 short scenes in a whole film is sooooo much more important than your wedding. lol
That’s 4 raunchy, bisexual scenes too many.
Okay, QT. We’re on it.
She was funny in the first one. I guess since she they don’t really make rom-coms anymore her new shtick is raunchy stripper/sex fiend. As long as the body double is willing and the plastic surgeon is on speed dial why the hell not?
I can’t stand this woman but I did liked her role in the first Horrible Bosses. That’s how it should be from now on. If she’s in a movie make her scenes short ones and not centered around her. I must admit I really liked that movie and looking forward to the sequel. Charlie Day and Justin Bateman reeled me in.
I did like her in ‘Horrible Bosses’, probably the only film of hers I’ve seen and liked her in it.
My mom rented ‘We’re the Millers’–my God. What a waste of a movie. I mean I chuckled at a few parts, but as a whole? It was awful. The kid with the weird eyebrows was funny, but other than that? It could have been a lot better than it was. Like the stripping scene–it would’ve been hilarious if, instead of showing how sexeh Rose was, they could’ve shown that she was the world’s worst stripper, which is why she was so desperate to work in a strip club (that was going to make her into a prostitute), and why she took Sudeikis’s character up on his offer. The only person who elevated the material was the teen w/the weird eyebrows. Everyone else was mediocre. Wasted opportunity to actually make a really funny movie–the writing was like someone in 10th grade wrote it.
@virgilia – that’s exactly what I said when the film came out. Instead of playing the stripper as sexy, she should have played it all screwball and slapstick – the world’s worst stripper.
Of course that might have required some talent, so…
I agree, virgilia and epiphany. It would have been hilarious and made a lot of sense to the story if she were terrible. Instead, the scene is yet another desperate reminder that Jennifer is still “hot”, and it’s really out of place to play the stripping scene as straight sexy when the whole movie has such a slapstick tone. I liked the first Horrible Bosses, but I am not thrilled to hear that she is reprising her role, because it really is starting to seem like she’s in a raunchy comedy rut.
I really liked we are the millers. But I found her strip tease very awkward. I just can’t see her as sexy.
She is funny but too stiff to be taken seriously in risque scenes/roles.
Get ready for Aniston’s PR to go into full force as Maleficent gets more attention.
I figured that too.
Good god will Anniston never stop? She’s another one who’s going to go the plastic surgery route ( a la Demi Moore) instead of aging gracefully. She’s not hot.
I’m sorry I think she looks beautful! I don’t know what picture your looking at!
Well, I think beautiful is an exaggeration, but I’ll give you this; she looks a thousand times better with dark hair. Suits her coloring much better than that awful brassy blonde.
@ crab
I totally agree!
CRAB SAYS: And the pictures of Jennifer Aniston you are looking at is photo shopped contrast her street paps and the ones we are looking at there isn’t a thing beautiful about Jennifer Aniston natural features, she looks just like Iggy Pop a man.
@ Floretta, no I’ve seen pictures of her out on the street and sorry but she looks just as beautiful! I do agree with epiphany that she looks a lot better with dark hair! It brings out the blue in her eyes! And what actress/actor isn’t photoshopped to oblivion when they’re not out on the streets!
She has Peter Pan complex – she will never age gracefully. If she doesn’t stop soon she will end up looking like Peter Burns.
She’s already started aging and I think she still looks great.
That is what happens in Hollywood. There is huge pressure on these women to stay young looking. Unless you are Meryl or or Helen Mirren you will feel the pressure to bio and tuck.
I totally agree!
I agree, completely not hot (ack- that face in the close up poster *shudder*).
Agree. Plain Jane making other plain Jane’s feel special. Sorry Jenn Hens.
Thats EXACTLY what is is! You nailed it Michele!!
Is she duck facing in the promo poster?
“‘Jennifer Aniston… bisexual… addiction…schlong.’ I guess I should throw up …”
I just did. No thanks.
Yah – WHAT is appealing about any of this? Are we supposed to be entertained by try-hard sexy banter that isn’t funny or sexy, and a try-hard actress who could be replaced by any one of 2,000 other actresses in this part? Eww.
This sounds like fun & Dang!!…Jennifer looks gorgeous with dark hair.
I think the bigger news here is that Jennifer Aniston is now engaged to Jason Sudekis, according to the article.
That’s the kind of ground-breaking, hard-hitting journalism one can expect from the Daily Mail.
Heh. That was the big news to me too 🙂 oh copy editors, how we mourn thee.
AND Jason Sudekis’ wife Amanda Anka, lol! I guess they’re into polygamy now, huh? And here I thought that Jennifer was engaged to Justin Theroux; Jason Sudekis was engaged to Olivia Wilde; and Amanda Anka was married to Jason Bateman.
Well, considering she has affairs with her co-stars and not even the co-star being in a committed relationship stops her, ie Justin Theroux and Heidi Bivens, it just might come true. I wouldn’t put it past her to go after Jason.
Eh, it’s a comedy so I don’t really consider this some sexy siren kind of role. She can play a comedy sexpot, just not a straight-up sexpot.
Remember the film she did with Clive Owen (Derailed), it was her attempt at a serious character. She was horrible in it.
The whole film was horrible, including Clive Owen.
She also did serious or “straight man” characters in The Good Girl and Office Space. I agree with the funny sexpot vs serious sexpot as a better fit.
V4Real – completely agree, she ruined what could have been a good movie. Terrible hacktress.
Yeah, I thought the whole film fell flat. Like the ‘rape’ scene–what would’ve been really good is if Jennifer would’ve communicated something other than straight up fear. Maybe like a hint of desire, some excitement and familiarity, and if Vincent Cassell had looked at her or touched her like he knew her, like he knew her body—so that the audience would know that there’s something off about the scene.
That there’s something more to it—like maybe if he had touched a certain spot on her that was an erogenous zone, like behind her ear or something, and she moaned, melted into it for a minute (forgetting what they were trying to do), and then went back to acting like she was scared shitless. And then Clive Owen’s character would’ve had some suspicions about her–heightening the suspense in the film. My thoughts, anyway.
@Kaiser
No, you need to watch the first horrible bosses to understand how good she was there! I never was and still am not a Jen A fan, but damn that WAS raunchy, unexpectedly for me. Way more than We’re the Millers – where there definitely was a body double.
Im really looking forward to this sequel, i skipped the spoilers because I’m so excited to watch it!!!
She’s good at the comedic actress bit, why not? At least it’s not a variation of Rachel.
Horrible Bosses and Bad Teacher are two of my go-to faves when I need to laugh!
I absolutely love Bad Teacher!!!!!
Bad Teacher is the only thing I can stomach seeing Timberlake in, that movie is hilarious!
and now I can’t get Simpatico out of my head….thanks.
Me too! He’s such an awful actor, but that milquetoast role was perfect for him.
Just from that little exerpt, the script sounds like a hot mess. And it doesn’t make sense to me. If Jason Bateman’s character knew how freaking crazy Jennifer’s character was (through his best friend Dale), why would he go to her office for a meeting? And for a sex addiction meeting at that. When did his character become a sex addict?
Also–Dale has blackmail material on Jennifer’s character (he had Jamie Foxx’s character record her feeling up a patient), so why would she even be trying to seduce him? And why would he fall for it AFTER he’s married to whatever his wife’s name is? He made it clear that he was disgusted with her in the first movie.
This has already got me CONFUSED. I don’t know how they’d get over those ‘minor’ things. I’ll watch it because of Christoph Waltz though–love him.
Honestly she only had maybe one or two more scenes in the original. I actually liked her in it, thought she was funny. Charlie Day was the best part of it though..
I’m more curious to see if Bob Newhart will make another appearance?
So sad and desperate isn’t it. After 2 decades in the industry Jennifer has been reduced to stripping off her clothes and try to act sexy to be able to get any roles and attention. Usually it’s the other way around where new actresses have to be naked to get any parts.
How long is she going to be able to use her body (body double), hair, personal life, beg her show business friends to get her roles and attention? Not long it seems because people are getting tired of her and her pr games.
PS: despite the fact that Jennifer has a good body – she is not and never will be sexy and always seems asexual. Maybe it’s time she retires from Hollywood and gives the opportunities to real actresses with talent and instead settle down in Cabo with her gigolo.
Wow did she slap your mom or run over your dog? I am sure she will take these roles as long as they are offered and pay well. It is not her job to worry about the roles other people are offered. I agree that she is not a sexpot, but the role is more crazy funny psycho. Did you even watch the movie?
I am allowed to my opinions the same way you are allowed to yours.
And yes I did watch the movie because I don’t comment on something I haven’t watched. Jennifer is good a comedy but that’s it – she is not sexy and this role was ruined because of that fact.
I don’t think the role is meant to be straight sexy. More crazy and funny. You are suppose to laugh at how outrageous her behavior is with Day.
Well said Maya!
This has 2015 Oscar written all over it. For someone else.
Jennifer Aniston in another movie!?!
That’s just so fantast…. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
(wakes with keyboard stuck to face)
At the end of the day, if you’re showing me Charlie Day, you can have my money
She wasn’t funny in the first one. She can’t do much as an actress so coloring her hair is the only trick she’s got to show range.
or wearing a wig which she did in Horrible Bosses.
The wig will win an oscar before she does
Don’t forget going without mascara….the sacrifices and risks she has to make when doing a film.
You’re so naughty with that comment, and I love it. She’ll never live that one down!
Josephine, I still can’t believe she said that while in her late thirties/early forties. I don’t think I’ve ever heard something as idiotic as that comment right there, come out of a 20 something year old actresses’ mouth, let alone a supposedly established actress in her late thirties.
I really don’t think she realizes what she said. If the interviewers don’t stick to the script she has difficulty in coherently answering the questions. A couple of my favorites:
When asked what she likes about John Mayer (when they were dating): “I like how he thinks thoughts.”
When explaining her 41st birthday in Cabo was a charitable act to help Mexico’s economic downturn: “Mexico is really hurting right now because of the swine flu and the drug trafficking and all of this sort of stuff…“It sort of made sense to sort of say ‘Hey, let’s help out Mexico.’”
LOL!! As if staying in a $9,000 a night villa is helping out the people of Mexico. Boy, this chick is flaky.
The Daily Mail thinks that Aniston’s fiancé is Jason Sudekis? Hilarious. Poor Justin. Can’t get any respect.
Yeah, I had to reread it a few times to get what they were saying–such an awkwardly worded sentence. I would say ‘poor Justin’, but he signed up to be her gigolo for a good TWO years……
I noticed that too and was so confused thinking they were talking about Olivia Wilde for a second.
She was good in the first one! Overall it was a very entertaining movie. I’ll almost definitely watch the sequel.
I don’t generally like her but this movie was really good, so I suggest you to watch it Kaiser. Also.. it’s ok to spoiler but thatwas half of the movie?!
Why does every mediocre movie deserve a more mediocre sequel?
Why are there a million Walmarts and chain restaurants? Americans love mediocrity. It’s comforting, I guess, to know what to expect.
Fiance jason sudekis!?! What happened to justin theorux???
Oh look. Jennifer Aniston in another film where she has to take her clothes off.
Signs….Yawns
She is clearly a very talentless, mediocre one trick pony.
If that were true she wouldn’t still be making movies. I watched her in the Breakup recently. She was great in that movie. Plus The Good Girl, Along Came Polly. She’s done some decent stuff. I’ll watch the sequel, the first was hilarious.
No, she’s still making movies because Huvane makes sure she’s constantly in the tabloids, which makes producers think she’s still wildly popular, and they put her in films because of her supposed popularity. He does exactly the same thing for Gwyneth Paltrow, also his client. As long as Aniston keeps Huvane on the payroll, she will always have a career.
She’s still in films, because the films she makes are really cheap to make–30 to 40 million–and she does romcoms and comedies. And she brings a lot of attention to the movie, but it’s not HER that they’re coming to see–as evidenced by when she stars in a film, or when she’s in an ensemble. If she’s in an ensemble then the film does good, but if it’s HER that’s the draw and noone else, then it bombs i.e. ‘Management’. She can’t open a film by herself.
And she can’t play the romcom queen for too much longer—remember how Meg Ryan’s career turned out ( and Meg can act). Neither can she play the raunchy, dirty girl for too much longer.
I hope that she actually uses her production company for something other than her own romcoms. She’s said before that she’s never really gotten the roles she’s wanted–what I don’t get is why doesn’t she buy the scripts that she wants, and produces them herself? She has a ton of money from ‘Friends’, her endorsement deals, flipping houses–she has only herself to worry about, no other pressing responsibilities—if she wanted to she could’ve played a lot more interesting roles than she has.
She’s had the time and the money to do so, I don’t get why she doesn’t do it.
The Good Girl came out over 10 years ago! Her fans constantly bring it up like it was some masterpiece, when she could not even get a golden globe nomination for it. It was a fluke.
Lots of mediocre actresses still make films. They, like aniston, get the leftovers.
Cate B. is the same age as her (44) and look at the roles she gets. She is not desperate.
That Huvane bullshit is just that. Lol! Do you not think other actors don’t do PR? She’s in the tabloids because ppl are interested in her. You posted too! She has a huge following and that’s a fact. Cate B is not known for being a comedic actress although I’m sure if she so chose to she could be. Aniston has been nominated several times and won! She’s not a hasbeen no matter what you want to make her out to be. You don’t have to like her, her style, her boyfriend, her choice of holiday or her movies but at least be honest. She’s extremely successful for what she chooses to do. She doesn’t owe any of us an explanation of her choices in movies or her life.
Yes, lets be honest Maggie. Her movies suck. Her “huge following” watch her movies when they hit TV. Her PR consists of baby bump baiting, sympathy and her constant indefinate wedding plans.
She’s played the same role for years and she’s been very lucky to make the kind of money she made for “Friends”.
You’re wrong Maggie. I know you love this woman – not sure why, as she doesn’t know you exist, and furthermore, doesn’t care – but Havane is a PR mastermind. He’s the one responsible for her post-Friends career. “Poor Jen” was his idea. “Five years after Brad” was his idea. He plays the media like a virtuoso, which a mediocre talent like Aniston needs to get the attention she does. Take Huvane away, and Aniston goes the way of David Schwimmer.
When has being in a movie meant you had talent?
+1 epiphany, I know some need to believe the Huvane stuff is bs, but the fact remains that he was caught out giving tabloids stuff and ringing back once it was published to deny. Without him, she would be like the other 5 Friends stars. Without a career.
I wonder if she will use the” We’re the Millers” body double again? I can’t wait to hear about her diet and exercise regime to get ready for the film.
That’s what I don’t understand. Why would they have her get into shape, eating all those kale chips or whatever, if they’re going to use a body double for the stripping scenes? Which makes even less sense because she’s playing her actual age, so it’s not like she’s supposed to have the body or the butt of a twenty year old.
+ 100000000.
Jennifer is only in the showbusiness because of her stripping off and begging her so called showbusiness friends (not really friends but signed with the same agency).
She is only acting with the same group of people and doing Rachel in every role. Brilliant directors like Clint Eastwood, Martin S, Christopher Nolan (who famously laughed out loud at the thought of ever working with Jennifer) Steve McQueen, David Fincher etc aren’t knocking on her doors ever.
Nolan didn’t laugh out loud, the crowd did. He was asked if he would want to work on a Jen RomCom and he said no. If you have seen his work I don’t think he meant it as an insult to anyone. He is not a RomCom director. You are talking about drama directors and Jen is a comedic actress. People should stick with their strengths. I know you love Angie, and I think she is a good actress. That being said, I can’t picture her doing comedy. I think Angie excels at drama.
Earth to all of the JenHens–
In case you did not know, they do have recognition awards for Best comedic actress or Best comedy EVERY year– and guest what?!?!?
Aniston has never been nominated nor won for a FILM comedic role…other than the cheesy, PR-induced “Dirtbag” Award she received from People’s Choice for her role in Horrible Bosses.
Commenters here earlier have said it– she works best in an ensemble just like Friends. After 20 years being in the film industry – she is still just a character actress who cannot open a movie on her name alone. There are not enough JenHens to fill the seats.
I like that she’s dropped the twee sweetie from her repertoire. She played the first one as a super agressive sex fiend and it was fun.
Her and Cate B. are the same age! Amazing when you look at the class Cate has and the desperation aniston has.
Cate actually chooses quality roles. Aniston seems to only take her clothes off these days. She needs a new act. Same old, same old.
Maybe those are the only roles she’s been offered… Too bad.
Life of Crime received rave reviews at the Toronto Film Festival. Film is being described as a prequel to “Jackie Brown”.
Here are a few reviews:
http://scenecreek.com/tiff/tiff-2013-review-life-of-crime/
This one says it has some funny parts, but is, on the whole mediocre.
http://collider.com/life-of-crime-review/
This one says the director was very mediocre, and didn’t add much to the film, but didn’t make an out right terrible film.
http://fastfilmjudge.com/2013/09/15/tiff-review-life-of-crime-2013-daniel-schechter-tiff/
This guy, who was at TIFF and saw 22 films that week, said that the film was boring, Isla and Jennifer were terrible in it (he called them pathetic), and that it was a poor film to close the festival with.
http://exclaim.ca/Reviews/TIFF/life_of_crime-directed_by_daniel_schechter
Says it’s okay.
http://www.criticizethis.ca/2013/09/tiff-2013-review-life-of-crime.html
Says it has a ‘solid ensemble’, but was flat and rushed as a film. Says Mos Def and John Hawkes were good; Jennifer was ‘sadly playing it straight’, and Isla, Tim, and Will Forte got only a few minutes to ‘shine’.
In conclusion–the film is mediocre, hardly rave reviews.
And Tippy, the film is a prequel to ‘Jackie Brown’–it has the same two characters in it as before–Ordell and Louis i.e. Samuel L. and Robert Deniro.
That’s because she had a bag over head for most of the movie.
Life of Crime has a 78% on rotten tomatoes. It is certified fresh. V.C. that is a really good score. That means the vast majority of critics liked it.
JessMa, it only has 9 review so far!!! It is far from certified fresh, lots more reviews have to come in and likely that percentage will drop, probably to rotten!
What SHOULD be of notice is that none of the critics are really focused or commenting on Aniston…
Again, they have expectations of the other characters to carry the plot. It’s like Aniston is being used as an extra.
@JessMa
I googled ‘Life of Crime review tiff’ and those were the first ones that popped up……I didn’t pick them on purpose.
Nobody of any quality or importance wants to work with Aniston because she is a c-list actress masquerading as an a-list star because she has some very good PR.
In regards to her production company, I read a list of all the films that Echo Films was set to produce when the company first was set up. There were about 12 films on that list. As of today not one of those films has been made.
So she is a mediocre producer as well as actress.
I looked up on YouTube for her movie with Tim Robbins, Life of Crime, but I didn’t the trailer. Has you anyone seen it?
I’d consider that a failed producer, not a mediocre one.
@ Flor
I don’t think it’s been released yet. Maybe February??
@Flor, Cecilia
I just looked it up—‘Life of Crime’ isn’t getting released until December 31, 2014. So not for a while yet.
Thanks Virgilia!!
Mediocre producer?
You are exaggerating.
Aniston had had that Echo Films production company for like, 10 years now … and what has she produced? And why can’t she use at least some of her money, like other actors, to fund her passion projects?
Very Good PR? No, she has STELLAR PR. The Huvane Bros are the best in the business, bar none.
I thought she was great in Horrible Bosses.
The duck face doesn’t suit her.
Not in a million years would she be believable as a seducer or temptress! Who in the world could she seduce? I can’t take her seriously in any role because she flops her hands around and does her stupid smirk.
She is so blah.
I thought she was believable. She is very attractive for her age.
I thought she was very believable as well. And yes — she is very attractive for any age.
Of course you think she is believable. Fact is she could not seduce a thing in real life.
Me too, V4, me too.
I thought Horrible Bosses was funny, but I could not stand her in it. Maybe it was because I found the character obnoxious, or just the fact that she was obviously trying so hard to shake her image was obnoxious to me.
She’s about as seductive as a turnip. A movie critic wrote about her performance in “Derailed” when she’s hitting on a guy in the train. The critic said that Angelina Jolie could have nailed that scene in 1.5 seconds just by raising an eyebrow, whereas poor Aniston just managed to look constipated.
OTOH she really looks nice with dark hair. There, I said something nice about her.
I agree. That wig’s a keeper.
Aren’t you tired of the comparisons between the two (Angelina and Jolie) I know I am. Both are very attractive. If I could look like that esp at her age I would be blessed. Btw Angelina is like 8 years younger so yeah it is good to keep at that in account.
I think Janet only compared their acting skills and sex appeal. Where does age come into play when it comes to that?
I agree with you regarding Derailed. Miscast for sure. I prefer her with darker hair too.
Why bring up Jolie when arguing Aniston isn’t sexy? The only thing they have in common is Pitt, and he obviously found both women sexy, so it’s not a great argument.
Ouch… Sudekis isn’t her fiance. Justin better get hisAniston people on this.
I thought she was ok in the first one, but she did look stunning (as always). The cover of this one also suggests that she will also be giving an ok performance whilst looking gorgeous. 🙂
Either way, looking forward to watching it.
How does this woman keep getting movie parts? The Miller’s movie bombed. She truly leads a charmed life, because she is a mediocre actress. Her hair is 90% of her performance and personality. Every film she has had top billing in has bombed, and each performance is her Friends character revisited.
Don’t know who she blows for parts, but she’s blander than vanilla ice cream melting on a sidewalk in July.
Who knows, she prolly works for free. Who under 40 even cares about her? She’s old news???
This poor memaw is becoming more and more like Madonna. Retire already, you are old. Oh, and boring.