Jennifer Garner on sexism in Hollywood: ‘Isn’t it time to change that conversation?’

wenn21847154
Jennifer Garner was one of the honorees at the Elle Women in Hollywood event. She wore this very young purple sparkly dress which looked cheap and was tailored poorly, in my opinion. She also had on some nude lipstick that washed out her face. (Garner’s showing at Matthew McConaughey’s GQ event last night was much better. Kaiser covered that here.) During her speech at the event, Garner mentioned that Hollywood is run by men and that it can seem very sexist at times, especially when viewed through the prism of her life. She mentioned that she always gets asked about how she balances work and family life while her husband, Ben Affleck, never does. Then she complimented Emily Ratajkowski’s boobs.

At last night’s Elle Women in Hollywood event, honoree Jennifer Garner gave one hell of a passionate speech about sexism in the entertainment industry.
After being presented by Steve Carell, Ben Affleck’s other half took that stage to share a personal story the brought the audience to cheers and applause.
“The fact that there even needs to be a Women in Hollywood event is a little bit sad,” gorgeous Garner said during the annual event at the Four Seasons hotel in Beverly Hills. “I mean, the men in Hollywood event is every day—it’s called Hollywood. Fifty-one percent of the population should not have to have to schedule a special event to celebrate the fact that in an art that tells the story of what it means to be human and alive, we get to play a part.”

She went on, “So for example, my husband and I do kind of the same job, a little bit. Not long ago we both had one of those magical days, we call it a junket, where we both attended these lovely events where people come in every four minutes, they ask the same questions over and over again, you know the drill. We got home at night and we compared notes. And I told him every single person who interviewed me, I mean every single one, and this is true of the red carpet here tonight Elle, asked me, ‘How do you balance work and family?’ and he said the only thing that people asked him repeatedly was about the tits on the ‘Blurred Lines’ girl, which, for the record if we’re talking about them, they are real and they are fabulous [Garner’s referencing Affleck’s Gone Girl co-star Emily Ratajkowski]. Take a look and enjoy.”
After a pause for laughter, Garner continued, “As for work-life balance, he said no one asked him about it that day. As a matter of fact, no one had ever asked him about it. And we do share the same family. Isn’t it time to kinda change that conversation?”

[From E! Online]

It could be a self-perpetuating cycle, but Garner often talks about her work and family balance in interviews. That makes sense if people are asking about it, but I’ve heard her bring it up seemingly spontaneously on Letterman (although it was likely preplanned with her approval), on Extra and in multiple other interviews. In fact I just rewatched an interview she did with Extra when Samuel was five months old and she’s the one who broached the topic. All the Extra journalist did was congratulate her on the baby and she volunteered that “it’s absolute chaos, I really did not realize how much more work three was going to be than two. I’ve been a little overwhelmed.” There’s nothing wrong with that by any stretch, but she brought it up. This is her image as a devoted mom and I believe it’s genuine and that she perpetuates it. So it doesn’t seem sexist to me when people ask about it.

Also, Affleck has said many times that it’s harder for him to stay home with the kids, that he’d rather be working and that Garner does all the work with their children. Plus we know he loves boobs. Maybe it’s not sexism so much on the media’s part as just a normal response to their public personas. In no way am I suggesting that sexism does not exist in Hollywood, just that Garner’s examples don’t ring true for me. I’m glad she brought it up though.

wenn21849928

wenn21850048

wenn21799503

photo credit: WENN.com

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

55 Responses to “Jennifer Garner on sexism in Hollywood: ‘Isn’t it time to change that conversation?’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kitten says:

    I’m just gonna say this before The Hate Brigade shows up: Go, Jen!

    • Elle says:

      I actually like Jennifer. She’s exceptional at playing the Hollywood game: the family image and talk of balancing work and family for middle America, all while doing a mix of mainstream movies and small indie movies and, on occasion, addressing issues that matter to her, including feminism. The thing is, she never denigrates one or the other: She doesn’t diss clunkers like The Ghost of Girlfriends Past when promoting, say, Butter, or go on tangents about how she’s an artist being stifled by soulless corporate films (see: Meg Ryan). And when she’s promoting a big studio film, she’s at her all-American best.

      I think Jennifer is more complex than people give her credit for – I don’t really buy the “poor Jen, Ben is such a doofus.” I’m not sure there’s an actress out there right now with a better game than Jennifer.

    • Wilma says:

      Yes, go Jennifer! Who, by the way, is not saying that she shouldn’t be asked these questions, but that maybe her husband should be asked these questions too as they share the same family.

      • chaser says:

        Thank you!

        This is exactly what her comment is about. Balancing family and work is an important conversation (for those who care) but why is it only directed at women?

        Plus, maybe she bring it up more willingly because she’s been guided by broader society on what she ‘should’ be saying about her family? You can push against things all you want an occasionally you’ll still get sucked in to it. I know I do. Gender norms can be really subtle and evasive.

        Also, she is a marketable star who knows how to sell herself to the target masses. I think she would be worried that outright avoiding family talk might make her present as ‘not maternal’ and therefore aggravate the market. I can imagine the media swiftly turning on any celebrity mother that does not push the family angle (hey we’ve seen it with those that are childless). You might know better but do you really want to deal with that unnecessary wrath?

    • Ash says:

      Sometimes Jennifer Garner annoys me, but she’s absolutely right.

    • Veronica says:

      Yeah, as much she plays Suzy Homemaker most of the time, I think she has a very good point. When women and minorities stop being the “other,” we’ll stop having a problem.

      • Betty says:

        I think it’s a mix of sexism and the fact that motherhood has become a cottage industry in Hollywood. Actresses who don’t seem to have much going for them seem to stay in the spotlight by discussing their families. So, yes, it’s sexist for actresses to constantly be asked about work/family balance but it’s also problematic for certain actresses to use motherhood to make them stay relevant. While Cate Blanchett has children, she’s not really asked about these issues as much because she’s not known for being a mother and a wife, even though she is, Viola Davis, Meryl Streep and many more actresses are mothers and don’t get asked about this all the time. Jessica Alba, Jennifer Garner, Gwyn Paltrow, on the other hand, will get these questions because their careers have lost steam and they’ve draw acting career is no longer what she’s known for.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      Jen. I love you. Have loved you since Alias when you made me want a strong fit body instead of an emaciated body. But I would like to be in charge of your red carpet looks, esp your shoes. Ok thanks. Bye.

  2. Flounder says:

    I think she’s spot on.

    • OhDear says:

      Same here. I get what the author is saying, though – that it rings a bit false given her public persona.

      (This just randomly reminds me of the James Franco interview where Stephen Colbert went on his case (sort of jokingly) for not starting a family.)

    • Lucinda says:

      She really is. She is playing the game because it is required of her and as a result we talk about her a lot more than many other actresses. She knows how it works. Hate the game, not the player.

  3. Luciana says:

    I love how she passive aggressively said the ‘Blurred Lines’ girl instead of Emily Rabla Blahhh…

    • Jenna's Snark says:

      I think that’s the point. Emily has a name, but instead, in all of the interviews she was referred to as the “blurred lines” girl because of her boobs. If she didn’t have boobs and it weren’t from a men’s point of view, she would be referred to by her first name.

      • june says:

        She is being passive aggressive I think.
        Jen is being as bad as the media by only referring to Emily’s body.

        She should call her by her name. Not that hard Jen…..

      • Sara says:

        i agree June. she could have said her name and then pointed out that the media doesnt care about it. i also saw this as a passive aggressive statement.

      • Ash says:

        In this case, I don’t think Jen was throwing shade at Emily.

        I like Emily and I think Jennifer was saying that in how Ben gets asked about it. Emily isn’t Emily. She’s seen as the big breasted “Blurred Lines” girl.

      • pookah says:

        I thought so too. To me it was way harsh. Starts out being all feminist-y, then slams the young model who her husband is working with as only being a pair of boobs, like a typical catty ish.

    • Bunnies says:

      I think Garner’s comments about her husband’s costar are awful. I don’t get how people can see her as being ‘rah rah women!’ when she made that passive-aggressive comment. Also, does no one remember her BFF Reese Witherspoon’s pointed comments at during a speech at an awards ceremony years ago Blake Lively’s hacked or leaked nude shots, which were maybe made when ‘The Town’ was shot, maybe for Ben? (Witherspoon said if you’re going to take nude photos, at least hide your face…the connections were made on many, many blogs).

      Garner seems very nasty to me – and weak. If there is any truth whatsoever to Ben being an unfaithful jackass, she needs to make decisions within her relationship, not dehumanize Ratajkowski as a piece of meat.

      • vilebody says:

        I agree with @jenna’s snark. I think she was paraphrasing the crass and sexist questions her husband were asked. I doubt that Jennifer would have ever used the term “tits” in a speech if she were using her own words instead of paraphrasing.

      • Bunnies says:

        @vilebody – I posted below, I can’t seem to reply to you directly! I disagree, I think ‘take a look and enjoy’ makes pretty damned clear that Jen Garner thinks it’s cool to treat Emily Ratajkowski like a piece of meat and to ‘pause for laughter’ after her little set-up.

        It’s not ER’s fault that JG’s husband was apparently damned keen on casting her as his love interest. If she wants to blame someone, she should blame her husband.

      • Lena says:

        You really think any of the interviewers called her anything other than the ”
        Blurred lines girl?” Don’t blame Jen for quoting them accurately or putting a false motive on to her

  4. LP says:

    What she said makes sense to me. Just because her example might seem hypocritical doesn’t mean that her larger point – how men and women are viewed – isn’t valid. Ben Affleck talks about his family in interviews too but he’s asked about it less *shrug*

    • Heather says:

      It’s not how men and women are viewed, necessarily. It’s what reporters think WOMEN will want to read about Jen, vs. what WOMEN will want to read about Ben. The fact is men don’t read gossip sites, People mag and all that stuff nearly as much, so these narratives are audience driven to some extent and “feminism” has become a double edged sword; whenever you try and talk about “empowerment,” you are really marketing to a predominantly female audience and can only talk about issues that the lowest common denominator female consumer in America can relate to.

      • Elle says:

        This reminds me of Scarlett Johannsson’s comment during Avengers about how the guys got asked all of these interesting questions and she got asked about “rabbit food.”

      • chaser says:

        Really?

        I’d love to hear Afflecks response to how much of the family workload he takes on.

        Also, I’d love to hear Garner wax lyrical about a good set of boobs.

        The sound like much better interviews then the repetitive mindless drivel we get daily.

  5. Ginger says:

    LOL! “We know he loves boobs.” Who doesn’t? 🙂 I find it interesting that she’s constantly asked the family/work balance question and he isn’t and that all they asked him about was boobs. Sounds about right to me.

  6. K says:

    I thought Affleck was an ass man.

  7. Birdix says:

    For most couples, when you have a newborn, it’ll be up to the mother to undertake the majority of care, if she’s breastfeeding. So I’ll give Garner a pass for that one on Letterman. And if Garner does capitalize (she’s in so many commercials lately!) on her reputation as an everymother, we know Ben sells his family man image as well. So I would not discount her words at the event by her actions. I think she raises great points, and in raising them opens herself up to possible criticism. I’m impressed.

  8. OriginalTessa says:

    She’s such a beauty to me. I know not everyone agrees, but to me she’s gorgeous.

    • AlmondJoy says:

      I think she’s gorgeous as well!!!

    • Jayna says:

      Ben once said in an interview that Jennifer was so beautiful, naturally beautiful, and that she had no clue how beautiful she was. The girl goes without makeup every day and still looks great. I read an interview where she said unless doing an event or going out at night, she wears nothing, not even mascara as it even now feels fake on her. Now, her casual clothes day in and day out can be a mess, but few women, even younger than her, can get away with zero makeup and look like her. When she dolls up, she really is striking. I remember an interview back when she was in Daredevil when younger. I can see why Ben developed a crush on her. She’s still beautiful in her 40s, but back when she was younger, her face was always so fresh looking and glowing with killer dimples.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xr9_XcE9Io

  9. TTMuch says:

    Those interviewers were prolly just trying to be nice, you know? Softening her up so they could move in for the “did Ben see Blurred Boobs?” kill. That’s what you do when someone repeatedly talks about being a mom, you ask them about their kids. And balance, and if they’re leaning or whatnot. That’s sort of topical, right? Not saying she isn’t right about sexism in Hollywood, but I think her perspective might be skewed. Also, hate the word t*ts, so my perspective might be skewed

  10. Jessica says:

    I completely agree with her point. I’m just not sure she’s the one to make it, considering she’s sold that “perfect celeb mother” image as her bread and butter for so long. I mean, she has every right to say what she said, and good on her for bringing it up as it should be brought up more often, but it would be great to have a celeb mom who doesn’t sell her mom-ness to say she’s sick of hearing that question. Or you know, have more celeb moms not sell their mom-ness in general. A woman talking about her family isn’t going to get me to see her movie, or buy whatever she’s selling, you know.

    • frivolity says:

      I completely agree with her point and with yours.

      Didn’t another actress once say that the Affleck household is right out of the 50s or out of Mad Men with their division of gender roles? If that works for them, fine, but then it is a bit hypocritical to flaunt those archaic gender divisions when you are selling a movie (and campaigning for an Oscar) but then also complain about what you perpetuate.

      Jen’s absolutely correct, but it does seem disingenuous.

    • Elle says:

      Maybe her image means nothing to you, but I grew up in the Midwest, and her “everyday Mom” persona is gold. Last year, I was in an extremely conservative rural area, and overheard two women talking and the conversation was about how they used to hate Ben Affleck, but they like him now, because he has that great family and he and Jen just seem so great together, so he has to be a good guy.

      Look at Meg Ryan: she killed her career when she stopped playing the girl next door and openly mocked some of her most successful movies. It’s silly, but that image does still sell.

  11. Arya Martell says:

    Is it just me or does her comments about Emily come off with a twinge of jealousy & possessiveness over Ben? While I’ve never been a fan of hers she just scored brownie points with me. However, I kind of feel like she’s jumping on the bandwagon for attention. If she is being genuine and sincere, good on her. If not, what she said is still valid even if empty.

  12. Jessica says:

    Ben’s on the record basically saying she handles all the family stuff and he can just wade in when he feels like it. And he said that after being asked about work/life balance. He’s not asked about it again and again because he’s already said clearly that he’s all about the work.

    Garner has no problems shilling herself as a mother when it suits her. You can’t do that and then expect people to not keep asking you about being a mother. There are a lot of famous women with kids who rarely if ever get that kind of question, because ‘dedicated mother’ isn’t part of the image they’re selling. Charlize Theron, Penelope Cruz, Marion Cotillard, Cate Blanchett, Amy Adams, Michelle Williams, Julianne Moore…Until Meryl Streep’s daughter started acting I just assumed she didn’t have children, because no one ever talks about that side of her life, just her skills as an actress. I expect Scarlett Johansson’s going to go the same way.

    It’s worth noting Brad and Angelina both get that kind of question equally often, because they both talk about their kids and being parents often. If Brad talked about his family and Angelina just wanted to talk movies, Brad would get all the family questions. Interview 101, if you think someone’s going to be receptive to personal questions, you give it a shot. This isn’t sexism, this is about interviewers knowing they’ll get nothing interesting on the subject from Ben other than an acknowledgement that he has children and a wife, but Jen will give them a bunch of quotes about motherhood.

    • Aussie girl says:

      Well said @jessica. For the record I would ask her what she thinks about bens card counting and Ben whats his favourite thing about his kids. lol just to mix it up a little.

    • QQ says:

      TIIISSS Thanks Jessica, It’s not Sexist if that’s what you are Branding and make no mistake, homegirl is branding this Mom in Hollywood thing, especially when she has no movies on the lineup… or ONLY family movies, or if her husband is campaigning for awards etc

    • Wilma says:

      Good points Jessica. I hadn’t thought about it like that.

  13. Jenna's Snark says:

    She also ended the speech by sayig something along the lines of let’s stop pretending skinny jeans and crop tops are flattering. I love my skinny jeans but I hate hate hate this crop top trend! I thought with spring/summer over I could walk Into a store and not see them all over but of course they’re all still there and I’m picking up tops and going “oh, that’s cute!” Only to realize im holding a L and not a S and it’s a crop top.

  14. Carrie says:

    This from someone whose husband freely admits that he doesn’t help with the kids/house and leaves all that to her. Yes, what a poster girl for equality in the home.

  15. frivolity says:

    And to change the subject to an entirely superficial note …

    Jen looks so much better in the black dress versus the purple frock … and she really does need the bangs.

  16. Aye Gee says:

    I think she made some great points and I like what she said but coming form her it just feels… Idk… Disingenuous. She perpetrated this idea for years. Hell, she was one of the leaders of this whole mommy people magazine min van majority thing in the first place! And did she really have to call Emily the “blurred lines girl”? She has a name and I think the message would have been more effective if she had just addressed the fact that Emily is primarily known as the blurred lines girl.

    And did anybody catch that part where she talked about her job and the same questions? Why do celebrities insist on complaining? So what if you get asked stupid questions a bunch of times! It’s just part of the job. I wonder if any of them volunteered to swith lives with the help at this event.

    I wish they would get Angelina to speak at one of these events. But I guess the mini van majority still has a problem with her. It would be amazing to hear her speak on real issues that effect women.

    • Aye Gee says:

      Ugh forgive my typos. These iPhones, I tell ya….

    • Bunnies says:

      She didn’t just say ‘Blurred Lines girl’ – adding ‘take a look and enjoy’ is horrendous. Garner should be somewhat ashamed of herself, she has a much higher profile and 15 years on that ‘girl.’ I really don’t get how other women cannot see how deeply passive-aggressive and nasty it is to phrase things in this way while giving a freaking keynote address at a function meant to elevate women professionally.

      • pookah says:

        Thank you Bunny – I thought the same thing, she’s getting a huge pass for not being taken to task over that.

      • Clare says:

        Well you know Emily’s boobs were on display for everyone look at it in the blurred lines video and I’m sure her husband did enjoy filming that topless scene in GG. The recent star story about Ben’s affair with Emily are probably the reason for Jennifer’s bitchy comments. Jennifer Garner has spent years marketing her mommy in hollywood brand she has no one to blame that she constantly gets asked mommy qestions but herself and her PR people.

      • Lily says:

        @JOJO I’m glad someone else sees this as somewhat mean-spirited. It’s supposed to be a “women are awesome” themed event and she’s referring to Emily – a much younger woman – as a pair of boobs in front of an audience of people in the industry. There was no reason to other than hidden annoyance/jealousy. I’d be insulted if I were Emily. I’m sure if Emily wanted to do the scene with her top on, Jenny’s husband would’ve been the first to object lol.

  17. JoJo says:

    I don’t believe Jen is sharp enough to come up with that speech. My guess is Ben fed the talking points to her. Maybe she’s trying to uplevel and add a bit of edge to her white bread reputation. She’s really ‘got nothin’l when it comes to her career and hasn’t for some time. Yes, she’s “in movies” and that’s about where it ends. And I can’t even take the comments about Emily. To me, this was a veiled but very transparent attempt to “diss” Emily. Even if the reasonshe didn’t use Emily’s name in order to show how men think of her as simply ‘that girl’, it speaks volumes about Jen that she told that story about Emily in that precise way to the world, knowing how far it would reach. Really truly cannot stand her.

  18. Jellybean says:

    She is a naive idiot