NYT: Gwyneth Paltrow thinks people are sexist for ‘resisting’ her Goop

FFN_Paltrow_G_SX_PabloFF_111614_51586501

Here are some photos of Gwyneth Paltrow out and about in LA over the weekend – she was headed for a workout, apparently. Can I just have a word about those workout pants/Capris? They do not look comfortable at all. They do not look like great workout pants. I bet they chafe AND fall down at the waist. There’s nothing worse than having to adjust your clothing constantly during a workout.

Meanwhile, if you love or hate Gwyneth and her absurd Goop, you’ll probably want to skim this New York Times article. The NYT didn’t really profile her in a traditional sense, but they basically said that Gwyneth was the groundbreaker, the first of her kind as far as celebrity/lifestyle/branding crap goes. I’m sure that pleased Gwyneth to no end – I mean, she only started Goop because she was bored and the parts started drying up. Now her side project has defined her brand and become relatively profitable, and other celebrity women are following suit. That’s why she’s so smug – she’s “the first.” (Except she isn’t the first, but whatever.) Here are my favorite parts:

[Gwyneth] is not alone; with her is Lisa Gersh, the 55-year-old owner of said apartment, a founder of Oxygen Media, the former chief executive of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Tracy Anderson devotee and, as of last month, C.E.O. of Goop, the aspirational — and controversial — lifestyle wellness-blog-cum-travel-and-cooking-tip-sheet-cum-shopping website Ms. Paltrow founded in 2008, and which Ms. Paltrow says she likes to think of as “contextual commerce.”

“The other day Drew Barrymore and I were talking, and she said, ‘Thank you for going first and getting all the scratches,’ ” Ms. Paltrow said, noting that Ms. Barrymore had started a cosmetic line, Flower, in 2012. This was not long after Jessica Alba created her site, the Honest Company, to offer natural baby products and diapers; which was only a few years before Blake Lively founded Preserve, a made-in-America crafty vision; and Ellen DeGeneres introduced her E.D. brand, an ambitious project that bowed on QVC last month with holiday home wares and will expand next year into numerous product categories, as well as a website and bricks and mortar retail; and Reese Witherspoon announced that she was starting Draper James, a lifestyle brand, due in 2015.

The question is why, and whether it will last.

“It’s like heroin,” said Graydon Carter, editor of Vanity Fair and host of the New Establishment Summit. “You get on Twitter, and then you are dispensing advice about face cream to 500 followers, and the next thing you know you are a lifestyle guru.”

“Actors are not making anywhere as much money as they used to,” Mr. Carter said. “Hollywood is not making the kinds of movies that require gifted performers. They are making the kind of tent pole movies that require rippling abs, and women as extras. So you have to make up that income somehow.”

Between the heightened competition and the expansion plans, it’s hard not to wonder if Ms. Paltrow considers herself primarily an actor or a businesswoman. “I don’t like to think I have to be one thing or the other,” she said, looking out over the East River at the sunset. Ms. Gersh shakes her head and joined in.

“You know,” she said, “lots of people have multiple careers. I was a lawyer, and then one day someone called and the next thing I knew I was in TV — —”

“People like to classify you, and when you start pushing out of your box it makes them nervous,” Ms. Paltrow said. “There’s a lot of resistance to women coming to the table with anything new. But if it were Justin Timberlake or Jay Z or even Donald Trump, everyone would be like, ‘OK.’”

She thought for a moment. “If I had to say something, I would say I am a generator of creative content,” she said. Ms. Gersh nodded approvingly.

[From The NYT]

Oh, Gwyneth. Really? Gwyneth playing the sexism card. SMH. She and Gersh joke about their goal being “world domination,” but even some of industry experts – and TOM FORD – are quoted as saying they don’t know if this is just a dumb trend that will die out in a few years, like “hey, remember when celebrities had lifestyle brands?” Oh, and of course Drew Barrymore “thanked” Gwyneth for being the first. OF COURSE.

FFN_Paltrow_G_SX_PabloFF_111614_51586497

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

81 Responses to “NYT: Gwyneth Paltrow thinks people are sexist for ‘resisting’ her Goop”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LadyMTL says:

    I wonder what Martha Stewart has to say about GOOP being the “first?” Oh yeah, she already addressed that, lol. Martha forever! 😛

    • Kate says:

      I mean…I guess you could argue that Martha was famous specifically for the lifestyle brand though where as Paltrow was an actress first. But then I would still say Jennifer Lopez was a brand (in a different way) before GOOP.

      • Loopy says:

        @ Kate you posted what i was thinking two mins ahead lol but in terms of J.lo i think they used to call her a triple threat,then she branched out into her perfumes and clothing line(does that still exist?)

      • Bobbiesue says:

        Let’s not forget about Jessica Simpson. Singer, reality star…mega mogul. The main difference I see is that GOOP was shilling through a website or “blog” she supposedly ran. The other ladies just out-sourced their wares.

    • Loopy says:

      I think they mean the first for someone who already had her core profession i.e actress where as Martha Stewart was always known for being the lifestyle guru.Correct me if I am wrong.

      • Dingo says:

        Yep I agree. Now Blake, Reese etc. are following her footsteps.

      • Miffy says:

        Martha (we’re on a first name basis) started out as a model.

      • Kori says:

        I took it to mean with the whole website/social media presence. Gwyneth doesn’t have a line of clothes or perfume, rather it is all things she puts out on her website.

    • Or Kathy Ireland, who doesn’t get as much press–deliberately–but is incredibly successful in the lifestyle niche.

    • avh says:

      Martha is a pioneer of all things DIY: crafts, foods, building, fabrics, media, and on and on and on. She built it all from the ground up. From her brain output to tangible good things! GOOP is a purveyor of goods. She taps into gurus of designated fields. Perhaps she is the first for a celebrity run aspirational site. Perhaps there is truth in her comments about sexism. Boys never get talked about like this but they also don’t pimp out their roles as husbands & fathers… but is it because boys have no problem booking acting gigs? Who knows… I’m just a commoner.

  2. Kate says:

    I don’t know. I always think of Jennifer Lopez as being one of the first celebs of my generation who started to cultivate a lifestyle brand. When she started her perfume, that was kind of unheard of. Now everyone has one but she was considered bold when she did it.

    • Loopy says:

      But what about Elizabeth Taylor, she did the perfume and jewelery way ahead of ‘time’.

    • Christin says:

      Cher may have been the first (1980s), but Liz took it to another level in 1991 with her perfume and jewelry lines.

      • DoWhat says:

        What about people like Suzanne Somers? All these “lifestyle” sites are just celebrity endorsements with a 21st century platform. It’s not really innovative or new. Celebrities have always been selling a “lifestyle” – Liz Taylor? The Rat Pack?

        They’ve just been given a new way to directly tell you how to emulate them – and they get to make money from it.

    • laura.e says:

      I still wear glow by J.Lo (Hideous bottle.. but the cutest fragrance), all these years later!

  3. Jegede says:

    I must admit I would never have guessed Jessica Alba’s Honest would do so well all things considered. Good for her

  4. Alexandra says:

    Hollywood stars aren’t making enough just on movies alone? They have to make up that income somehow?! What? These people are so deluded.

    • BengalCat2000 says:

      That was my first thought too. Let’s get out the violins…

    • Ag says:

      that, and i loved “Hollywood is not making the kinds of movies that require gifted performers.” lol

      • Belle Epoch says:

        AG – I was going to call out that quote too! Love it. There are great actors out there, but it’s amazing how bad some of them really are.

        Side point: actresses have such weak voices these days. JLaw’s big scene ” you burn with us” is an example. Not an Ian McLellan moment.

      • Anna B says:

        I snorted at that quote as well – and then naughtily thought to myself that Jennifer Lawrence didn’t seem to be doing too badly on the career front, or doing much work as an ‘extra’. Bad of me, I know…

    • Sara says:

      to be fair he said “as they used to”. i guess hollywood reflects society in that regard to. while there are now two or three actors who make incredible amounts that werent possible before (RDJ for example) but the typical 5-20 million per movie isnt really there. there is a wider gap between the middle and upper class in hollywood.

      not defending those salaries but nowadays it is more profitable only for a few while back in the days it was more spread out.

    • Coco says:

      Instead of creating lifestyle brands why don’t these ladies start their production companies and make films that do provide a real voice for women.

  5. Khou says:

    I have workout pants like that and the are extremely comfortable but do not fall down. I don’t know how they do it- it’s like magic.

    • Granger says:

      I bet she has little spandex shorts on under those pants, though. She has the ass of a stripper, you know, and isn’t it awesome that a 43-year-old mom can wear SHORTS? #thingstoaspireto

    • layla says:

      I own TWO pairs of pants like that. They are THE MOST comfortable things I have ever worn. End of story!

  6. Charlotte says:

    I bet she’d be great to get drunk with. I really think she’d be a blast. Imagine the nonsense she’d spout whilst drunk.

    On the topic of celebs trying to make up the income, will Leann Rimes shilling a pyramid scheme to her sycophants on twitter be covered?

  7. PHD Gossip says:

    Her husband can’t stand her. Whats to emulate?

  8. Courtney says:

    Showing up to defend the GOOP. Don’t know why exactly, but I love her!

  9. Miffy says:

    What?! Didn’t Justin Timberlakes attempt at this nonsense quietly crash and burn just last week?

    My head is exploding. Idiots like Goopy, Miley and Swifty whipping out the sexism card every time they want to whine that people aren’t acknowledging how special they are is killing feminism. The whiners and the man bashers ruin any serious conversation about equality. “That’s sexist” is the adult female version of taking the ball and going home.

    • Ag says:

      it does seem to be the go-to opt-out these days. “i don”t have to address criticism, valid or not, because criticism of me is sexist per se.” ugh.

    • Josefa says:

      THANK YOU SO MUCH. It’s really sad, but the bra-burning or whiner stereotype of feminists is far from dead. Women like that still exist and they are not few. It makes me furious.

  10. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Every criticism of a person who happens to be a woman is not sexism. If you whine and cry sexism for every trivial response you dislike it takes away the real meaning of the word and diminishes the chance of anyone listening when actual sexism occurs.

  11. Birdix says:

    The other day Drew Barrymore and I were talking, and she said, ‘Thank you for going first and getting all the scratches
    This almost seems calculated–Goop knows people love to hate her and so she’s feeding them… Or she’s trying to be self-depreciating and ended up sounding like an insecure ass?

  12. GiGi says:

    I know her thing is the lifestyle branding… and everyone is referencing JLo… but what about Elizabeth Taylor? Actors have been parlaying their fame into other businesses for ages – Gwyneth is just about the opposite of the 1st.

    • SkinnyFatHunnam says:

      Yes, Miss Taylor started it with her immensely successful White Diamonds fragrance. The reason Alba’s company does well is because it’s not elitist at all. Goopy and Blakes’s Preserve are snobbery personified.

      • Ag says:

        alba’s company isn’t elitist, and it sells good products (at least the diapers and wipes are excellent – we used to get them before switching to 7th generation, which is way cheaper).

      • Coco says:

        Alba’s Honest company? Not that honest; organic mom is a smoker.

  13. Christin says:

    Forget her capris. What is going on with her hair color? She obviously likes crayon yellow or she wouldn’t continue to wear it that way.

    Trendsetter? I think not. Drew’s gushing doesn’t make something true.

    • kri says:

      @Christin-so with you on that hair color. Dear god, someone take her to a colorist (if she can afford one, poor thing) and get that canned corn color OUT. Oooh, I hope no one took that as a sexist comment.

      • Holly says:

        That’s all I could see, too. I was too focused on that pile of free-range, locally sourced straw on her head to see the pants. She’s not the only one that goes for a yellow not in nature. You’d think with all of that money they could pay someone to get blonde right.

  14. Gina says:

    This woman is an egomaniac. She is one short tier away from Amanda Bynes.

  15. IndieChick says:

    Beyond the perfumes, I honestly think Jaclyn Smith was the first actress in the 80’s with her fashion brand at KMART, Kathy Ireland would be the first supermodel to brand as well.

  16. Mzizkrizten says:

    So when Idina Menzel throws the sexism card it’s ok but when Gwyneth does it’s not? LOL

    • perplexed says:

      It depends on how one phrases what they’re criticizing. I haven’t read what Idina Menzel said, but if people were okay with it, I assume she phrased her response better.

      GOOP, the website, is pretty annoying and would be regardless of whether it was made by a man or a woman. I assume Jay-Z has ventured into the business side of lifestyle branding and has succeeded, since Gwyneth has referenced him, but does he have a website as annoying as GOOP that everyone can mock so easily and so daily?

  17. Spikey says:

    Kaiser, let me tell you: These workout pants are fantastic! I have similar ones (though much, much cheaper I guess). The tight, legging-like affairs absorb too much moisture and you overheat much more quickly. Plus, nothing beats good quality cotton.

  18. mar says:

    Gwyneth is no pioneer here. Come on. Whoever wrote that article is just a kiss a ss

  19. Sara says:

    It is amazing to me how many women where aviator frames and they look horrible on their face shape. Aviators make you look older in the face imo. I wish I could pull them off but they make my laugh lines look ten times worse!

    • Jess says:

      I used to be so jealous of women who could pull off the aviators, I have one rogue eyebrow that’s higher than the other and aviators made me look ridiculous, but finally found a pair that are much bigger than traditional ones and they work for me, they cover both eyebrows and I love them! But I agree, not a good look on Goop here, that godawful hair color isn’t helping.

  20. Sara says:

    Swifty and Goop are working hard to take any meaning out of the word sexism.

  21. SnarkGirl says:

    She is FAR from the first – what an egomaniac!

    Also, people aren’t resisting out of sexism (what utter nonsense) but because only a very select few have the disposable income to shop her “curated” items. She is an elitist snob who is completely out of touch with reality. What was that white tee she was selling priced at? $400? Sorry Gwynnie, but for $400 I can stock my closet with an entire new wardrobe, white tee shirts included.

    • Bobbiesue says:

      You just made me realize that the recent quote from JLaw about how ridiculous it is in LA that people charge $150 for a white t-shirt, she only recently gained fame and money and furnished her house with IKEA, etc…I wonder if that was an extra jab at goopy?!

  22. Astrid says:

    When I first looked at the thumbnail, I thought it would be a story about Lean Rimes.

  23. Santolina says:

    ‘If you don’t like me and my lifestyle business, it’s on YOU. You must be sexist or something.’ Classic narcissist GLOP. My new nickname for this self-deluded brat. Gloppy, please stick to acting, where you actually have some talent.

  24. whatsmyname? says:

    Goop have been taking some notes from her friend Swift bless her.

  25. ojulia123 says:

    I imagine that after the Goop poops, she gazes lovingly into the toilet and says, “I am a generator of creative content.”

  26. Veronica says:

    I don’t think she’s necessarily suggesting resisting GOOP specifically is sexist but more that women get more backlash for exploiting their fame. She’s narcissistic sure, but I’m not entirely in disagreement for her on that one. The one interviewer made a fair point about women being used as props in films, so their acting contributions are less valued.

    • Marcelmarcel says:

      Agreed. The standards for acceptable behavior is much narrower for women celebrities than it is for men. I was thinking about this today in the context of Russell Crowe and Katherine Hegel. Her career floundered because she publicly made critical comments about working on Grays Anatomy & Knocked Up. Russell Crowe is the star of Water Diviner (which comes out on Boxing Day in Australia) even though it’s widely known that he hit someone with a telephone. There are other examples, that was just the one I was thinking of today.

  27. flomaximillian says:

    No wonder she loves Obama. It’s always someone else’s fault.

  28. DogMom says:

    Her calves look to be as wide as her thighs. Is that a thing now?

    Sexism or not, that doesn’t look sexxy to me.

  29. poppy says:

    she can’t get parts. she can’t carry a movie. she failed as an actress.
    her endorsement deals steadily lose prestige. her attempts at singing and all the entrepreneurial enterprises are laughable and are about as creative as dirt.

    she should have gone off, had her kids, and finished her higher education (heavy concentration on public speaking) while everyone was happily ignoring her. she just can’t stand to be out of the lime light and she will take any attention, (hardly) good or (mostly) bad.
    she seems resigned to getting attention for anything but her acting but the only thing people believe she’s an arbiter of is putting her foot in her mouth and having a unicorn horn up her special snowflake stripper’s butt.
    but i must be sexist.

  30. Bread and Circuses says:

    Funny how no one EVER criticizes the Goop brand for the fact that a woman runs it. They only criticize it for being elitist, ungrounded hogwash.

    That’s “sexism”, is it?

  31. Sofia says:

    The pretentiousness these people exude makes want to vomit. They have no idea of how ridiculous is the stuff they are saying, do they? Unbelievable.

  32. jess says:

    “Actors aren’t making near as much in Hollywood anymore!!”. Don’t you mean GP isn’t making as much in Hollywood. Cause she was never a good or very popular actor. I think that’s why her and Jessica Alba are so similar. They are both bad actors who parlayed that fame into making money somewhere else.

    • Sofia says:

      I don’t get why someone who already has millions NEEDS to do something else because there aren’t more millions coming in anymore. Greedy, no? She likes to act or just the money?

  33. yessa says:

    I used to like Goop. Of course, I couldn’t afford anything on that site but it was fun just to see what the 1% of Americans were interested in – whether it’s traveling, reading or specialty items. Now, I think it’s a rather bland site. But I may dislike GOOP now after Goopy has flapped her gums way too many times and alienated basically everyone except her friends. I think she’s a bore. BTW – The New Yorker has a great article on the Gluten anxiety in America. Maybe Goopy should read it before she continues to misinform America on what their dietary needs are.

    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/03/grain

  34. scout says:

    Wanna be “Martha Stewart” but she will never admit it. I used to like her as an actress.

  35. L says:

    “contextual commerce” = you’re wealthy enough to buy the s*#^ from her website which is something very few people can afford to do. Once again, snooty and dismissive GOOP…