“Kendall Jenner wore a fur vest during Paris Fashion Week” links

FFN_KendallJ_Hotel_CHP_030816_51990488

Kendall Jenner’s PFW ensemble confuses me. [Moe Jackson]
A blind item about shrooms at the Oscars. Brie Larson? [LaineyGossip]
I think Kelly Rohrbach’s Baywatch swimsuit is too tight. [Celebslam]
Lady Gaga is still publicly supporting Kesha. [Buzzfeed]
Donald Trump is a dumb, tantrum-prone child. [OMG Blog]
This huge rabbit is everything. Just… everything. [Mashable]
Dolly Parton is going on tour, y’all! [XOJane]
Whoopi Goldberg & Charlie Sheen to make a 9/11 movie. [Dlisted]
Farrah Abraham just needs to stop talking. [The Hollywood Sigh]
Mind-blowing facts about sexism in Hollywood. [Mode]
Uber needs to hire a crisis manager or something. [The Frisky]
Zac Efron and Sacha Baron Cohen hung out, for some reason. [Seriously OMG WTF]
Leonardo DiCaprio’s step-brother is a fugitive. [IDLY]

FFN_KendallJ_Hotel_CHP_030816_51990489

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

44 Responses to ““Kendall Jenner wore a fur vest during Paris Fashion Week” links”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Wentworth Miller says:

    KJ doesn’t annoy me.

    • Tiffany says:

      Give it a minute…

      • Wentworth Miller says:

        I wish I could have written my comment in a whisper because the younger K was the only one that I liked until she turned into…., well, there’s no need to finish that but you’re right.

  2. Kitten says:

    This whole family just LOVES to wear dead animal. So fug but what else is new?

    • BengalCat2000 says:

      They should be forced to watch what those animals have to endure in order for them to “look good” but I doubt it would make a difference. Disgusting family on every level.

      • Kitten says:

        They really should…but you’re right that it’s unlikely that they’d care.

      • What was that says:

        My fathers expression would be,’What do expect from a sow but a grunt?’…that whole family are obnoxious and greedy and why all the websites give them this publicity makes them richer and everyone else the poorer for how they bring everything down to their crass level..
        I hate fur ..on humans..and she seems such a smug bitch ….thinking she is all that!….so ignorant!,…gosh I loathe fur wearers!!..you can tell!!!

    • Melly M says:

      I guess they believe fur shows they have money. They obviously haven’t gotten the memo that people don’t view it that way anymore.
      Everybody just thinks: ridiculous look, stupid, cruel

      • Smoothie says:

        They think it’s an ultra-hip bling bling thing to wear fur. They look really bad on top of being unethical.

    • saras says:

      Lol sounds like the torture they routinely endure at the plastic surgeons office so they don’t care!

  3. lile says:

    She is a fur hag like the rest of the gross women in that family. What I want to know is where can I get a coat made out of some KHOS?????

    • saras says:

      That would be the only show featuring them I would watch! Lol or them getting eaten alive by foxes or whatever other carnivourous pelt animals…

  4. swak says:

    Why is anybody shocked that she is wearing fur? The whole family wears fur including 2 year old North (not her choice, her parents’ choice).

  5. mia girl says:

    Oscar blind item: Agree it is definitely Brie Larson…
    and I the other person has to be Taylor Swift.
    And can I say, I kinda love Larson for trolling Swift and her squad.

  6. Tiffany says:

    People just released another excerpt from Padma’s book.

    I might have to get Padma’s book.

    • Wentworth Miller says:

      I read the lil excerpt and was wondering if it was worth getting. I only know of Padma from a cooking show and the other players, no idea. You know when references are made and get lost because you aren’t familiar with any background? That’s what it is for me for a lot of the posts.

  7. CornyBlue says:

    Blind Item: Jenny Beaven the mmfr costume designer?

    • mia girl says:

      You know what… I think you may be right.

      But I will stick to my guess above for the second person in the blind… it is Taylor Swift.
      And now I love this story even more!

    • tealily says:

      She’s the one I thought of too! Do you think she’d end up at the “top tier” party? She very well may, that was a big movie.

    • Rhiley says:

      I was thinking perhaps Susan Sarandon because chicka likes to party and she has an Oscar on her shelves. Susan likes the good stuff too and makes no bones about it.

      • mimif says:

        That’s a good guess, but I was thinking Patricia Arquette as she’s supposed to do the voice over as a “hippie mom” for Toy Story 4.

    • Portugal the Stan says:

      That was my immediate thought, Jenny Beavan. The author made a point of the shroom woman not being tall and thin or wearing a beautiful gown.

  8. MinnFinn says:

    I can’t shade anyone for wearing fur because it seems to me that the only non-hypocritical way to be anti-fur is if one is also doing a vegan diet and lifestyle which I am not. Oh and that is not a good color on her. Makes her skintone look orange-ish.

    • Hudson Girl says:

      I think many differentiate between the two. For instance, eating grass feed beef and leather isn’t the same thing as wearing fur because of the way the animals live and then are killed off. But, I’m sure someone here will know a lot more than me on the subject.

      (I’ve seen some REALLY cute faux fur options for those wanting more texture and a play on scale, etc.)

      • Pookie says:

        `grass fed beef and leather“ isn`t humane either. All you have to do is Google animal slaughter and you`ll see that no slaughter is humane.
        No animal wants to die especially for us to eat their flesh and wear their skin.
        And yes…I`m a vegan for moral and ethical reasons. 43 years this year.

      • Smoothie says:

        I agree all animal killing (unless you’re an indigenous tribe in a remote area who can’t live on anything else) is unethical. Fur and leather go a step further, with fur being just awful. It’s not necessary for survival like food is and we all know about the live skinning practices. This family is just UGH. They look bad on top of everything. Kim and her stupid a$$?

      • islandwalker says:

        That a nice story to ease the conscious. Killing is killing no matter how you think they were happier in a field. ( I will add that I don’t care to regulate others. I have enough trouble keeping my own house in order.)

    • platypus says:

      With that train of thought, you could say just about everything is hypocritical and thus not worth doing, though. Please don’t listen to the vegans who preach this. If everone cared even just a little bit about where they put their money, it would have made a world of difference.

      • Kitten says:

        Exactly. I don’t understand the *all or nothing* approach either. It’s like saying “Well you don’t recycle so you can’t get mad at people who litter.”

      • Jwoolman says:

        Yes. Even just reducing dependence on animal products (food and clothing) helps, and certainly working to make the lives of the animals happy and their deaths easy helps. There is no conflict between eating carnivore and caring about how the source of your food is treated. Life isn’t all or nothing.

        I do think the planet and our souls and bodies would be better off without human predilection for eating other animals, since we simply are not obligate carnivores but just have developed the habit and we also are capable of causing far more destruction than other species. But I’m happy if the idea that a meal doesn’t have to have animal products in it spreads, even if people just do it a few times a week and not just because they can’t afford the meat. And certainly deliberately seeking out food sources that come from animals treated well is a very important step, regardless of how you eat.

      • Smoothie says:

        Agree with you guys that a little or halfway is better than nothing, but you have to draw a line somewhere. It’s not black and white but just knowing the limits. I can see how vegans can be militant in their approach and put people off. The best way is recognising some standards are better than none without using halfway efforts as a cop-out to do your best, which is an individual choice anyway. Back to the topic: fur is especially despicable – farmed or wild – and it takes this idiotic family to pretend it’s a fashion-forward thing.

      • Angelica says:

        Thank you for saying this. I’ve been beating myself up for months about this but I had to ask myself why. I live a vegetarian/pescatarian lifestyle 98% of the time. Any little bit helps, but as soon as I eat a bite of chicken in a casserole, I feel this tremendous amount of guilt. It’s okay to go partway because if we all did this, we could still contribute massively to the environment and animals.

        P.S. I haven’t eaten a pig or cow in 6+ months, am anti-fur, pro-vegan, anti-factory production, and won’t drink cows milk, but sometimes you just don’t have enough resources to avoid everything.

  9. Rade says:

    For a “supermodel” she sure is plain. So, so plain. Even minus the “super” bit, she’s plain. Her skin looks bad too, even under all that make-up, so her career trajectory is obviously not based on having flawless skin or a jaw-dropping bone structure. If we’re honest, and I know it’s been said dozens of times before: connections + money = her career. See also: the Hadids.

    • PennyLane says:

      Models have become alarmingly homely in the last few years. Recently, the Wall Street Journal put out a fashion supplement – I haven’t read any fashion magazines in years, so I was stunned to see just how plain these professional models were. The only beautiful women in the pictorials were models from the 90’s who are now in their 40’s! That’s how far back they had to go to find some pretty women.

      “Fashion model” has become a career only available to the daughters of the very wealthy. Looks are not as important as connections…and boy does it show.

  10. Anastasia says:

    Farrah Abraham is so so so wrong for saying what she did. Ug. She bugs the everloving crap out of me.

    And of course Trump is a big baby.

    • pinetree13 says:

      YEs, i enjoy reading about Farrah for the train-wreck factor but that article just made me cringe.

  11. Abbess Tansy says:

    Not a big country music fan but I think I’d go see Dolly Parton in concert who is everything.

  12. Smoothie says:

    Pretty woman but nothing special. If she’d tried modelling before the age of social media, she’d only book local chain store catalogues. She’s got the weirdest facial structure – flat and broad – but very pretty eyes. I’ve seen photos where she’s so obviously digitally enhanced because the photographer couldn’t get a good angle on her face.

    This whole family encapsulates the idiocracy and their fur-wearing habits are terrible. Please youtube those live skinning videos and see what you’re contributing to when you wear dead animals.

  13. fiona says:

    I can’t stand Kendall because so many seem to love her the most out of all the kardashians. She seems worse than Kylie to me. Every time I’ve seen an interview, she’s incredibly smug and arrogant. In a subtle way. Girl, you’re only there because of your step sisters back door.

  14. sauvage says:

    Those are some very unfortunate jeans, and the vest does nothing to enhance them.